Maryland · individual fact

Maryland health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages6.3%2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 657.4%2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6574.4%2024 · #15 of 50 · highest first

Maryland over time

Explore Maryland readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Maryland officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Maryland effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Maryland change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Maryland · source units
MarylandPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 6.3%5%7.1%9.2%Maryland, 2014: 7.9%Maryland, 2015: 6.6%Maryland, 2016: 6.1%Maryland, 2017: 6.1%Maryland, 2018: 6%Maryland, 2019: 6%Maryland, 2021: 6.1%Maryland, 2022: 6.1%Maryland, 2023: 6.3%Maryland, 2024: 6.3%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 22National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginMaryland · Maryland approves collaborative-care coverage requirements · 2026-05-26Maryland collaborative careNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Maryland Legislature · 25422427225352252526242222222227522342532310225222232● U.S. Congress · Maryland delegation · 92◆ Governor · 478528102322■ Maryland agencies · 422010-03-012026-08-31

352 of 352 reviewed Maryland actions match · 215 date markers shown. 22 major events shown separately.

Maryland · 2024: 6.3% · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Maryland Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodMarylandRankU.S. benchmark
20246.3%#33 of 508.2%
20236.3%#29 of 50Not available
20226.1%#32 of 50Not available
20216.1%#33 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20196%#39 of 50Not available
20186%#36 of 50Not available
20176.1%#33 of 50Not available
20166.1%#33 of 50Not available
20156.6%#34 of 50Not available
20147.9%#40 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Maryland · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Maryland · 20246.3%
Maryland rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maryland
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Maryland5.7%7.1%8.5%20142024
2024 · Maryland: 6.3% · Rank #33 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maryland Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodMarylandCompare
20147.9%
20156.6%
20166.1%
20176.1%
20186%
20196%
2020Not available
20216.1%
20226.1%
20236.3%
20246.3%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · 6.3%2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland · your comparison6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

7.4%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Maryland’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
Maryland · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Maryland with every state.

Maryland · 2020$10,839
Maryland rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maryland
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Maryland$7.5K$9.39K$11.27K20142020
2020 · Maryland: $10,839 · Rank #17 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maryland Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodMarylandCompare
2014$8,574
2015$9,001
2016$9,321
2017$9,592
2018$9,934
2019$10,248
2020$10,839

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · $10,8392020 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland · your comparison$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maryland · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Maryland · 202277.8 years
Maryland rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Maryland population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maryland
Life expectancy at birth history in Maryland76.5 years77.7 years78.8 years20182022
2022 · Maryland: 77.8 years · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maryland Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodMarylandCompare
201878.5 years
201978.5 years
202076.8 years
202177.2 years
202277.8 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · 77.8 years2022 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland · your comparison77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maryland · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Maryland · 202310.9%
Maryland rank#15among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maryland
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Maryland8.9%10.1%11.2%20192023
2023 · Maryland: 10.9% · Rank #15 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maryland Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodMarylandCompare
20199.9%
20209.2%
20219.8%
202210.6%
202310.9%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · 10.9%2023 · Rank #15 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 10.2% – 11.7%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland · your comparison10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maryland · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Maryland · June 30, 202631.6%
Maryland rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · 31.6%June 30, 2026 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland · your comparison31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maryland · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Maryland · 2020$7,352
Maryland rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · $7,3522020 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland · your comparison$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maryland · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Maryland · 2023–202422.7%
Maryland rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · 22.7%2023–2024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland · your comparison22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Maryland candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

21 statements from 8 candidates

2026 Maryland Governor / Lt. Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Andy Ellis

1 statement

Green · Governor / Lt. Governor · MD

Care & public health

At the same time, we will be putting forward bold policy proposals that get at the heart of the issues facing Maryland: the need for a solidarity economy, the climate and environmental crises, high-quality public education, healthcare and housing as human rights, reliable public transit, divestment …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

At the same time, we will be putting forward bold policy proposals that get at the heart of the issues facing Maryland: the need for a solidarity economy, the climate and environmental crises, high-quality public education, healthcare and housing as human rights, reliable public transit, divestment from war and genocide, and more.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Andy Ellis — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

Wes Moore

1 statement

Democratic · Governor / Lt. Governor · MD

Health coverage

Expanded health coverage, pursued lower prescription-drug costs, removed barriers to care, and required insurers to cover recommended vaccines.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health Care

Candidate campaign source

Expanded health coverage, pursued lower prescription-drug costs, removed barriers to care, and required insurers to cover recommended vaccines.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Wes Moore — Part 89 verified source ↗

2026 Maryland U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 7 statements

Dan Schwartz

7 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MD

Health coverage

Repeal cruel cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, long-term care programs, SNAP, and community grants that hit MD-1 hard. Protect and improve the Affordable Care Act (ACA) which helps Maryland families access healthcare. Allow public option plans in the ACA marketplace to drive competition.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Repeal cruel cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, long-term care programs, SNAP, and community grants that hit MD-1 hard. Protect and improve the Affordable Care Act (ACA) which helps Maryland families access healthcare. Allow public option plans in the ACA marketplace to drive competition.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Schwartz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 6 more statements from Dan Schwartz
Health coverage

Increase the number of commonly used drugs under the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and speed up the program’s timeline to drive costs down for those medications.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Increase the number of commonly used drugs under the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program and speed up the program’s timeline to drive costs down for those medications.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Schwartz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Healthcare costs

Increase protections for individuals impacted by high-cost medical debt.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Increase protections for individuals impacted by high-cost medical debt.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Schwartz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Rep. Andy Harris is perpetuating a scam on the American people by cutting taxes for billionaires while doing nothing for working families in Maryland. Everyday costs, for housing, groceries, utilities, health care, and transportation are out of control. He’s supported the tariffs and cuts to critica…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Rep. Andy Harris is perpetuating a scam on the American people by cutting taxes for billionaires while doing nothing for working families in Maryland. Everyday costs, for housing, groceries, utilities, health care, and transportation are out of control. He’s supported the tariffs and cuts to critical services that result in thousands in additional annual costs for American families. For young people in Maryland, owning a home has become out of reach. It’s impossible to save for emergencies, let alone for vacations. We will re-write rules, and pursue sensible economic policies that make the economy work for Maryland families and working class people, instead of for billionaires.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Schwartz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Improve health care access and affordability in MD-1. Reverse changes to professional classifications that target prospective nurses and force them to utilize shady private student lenders. Incentivize health care providers to work and live in MD-1 through tax credits and student debt relief. Fund o…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Improve health care access and affordability in MD-1. Reverse changes to professional classifications that target prospective nurses and force them to utilize shady private student lenders. Incentivize health care providers to work and live in MD-1 through tax credits and student debt relief. Fund our rural hospitals and community clinics.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Schwartz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Improve and protect access to affordable healthcare and support vital public health research that’s been recklessly cut by the Trump Administration and DOGE.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Improve and protect access to affordable healthcare and support vital public health research that’s been recklessly cut by the Trump Administration and DOGE.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Schwartz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Expand existing federal rural mortgage programs (USDA Direct, FHA, and VA loans) and affordable mortgage programs for veterans, educators, healthcare workers and first responders.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Expand existing federal rural mortgage programs (USDA Direct, FHA, and VA loans) and affordable mortgage programs for veterans, educators, healthcare workers and first responders.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Schwartz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Maryland U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · MD

Health coverage

There’s a lot Congress can do to lower prescription drug costs, especially within Medicare. Johnny O supports more aggressive price negotiations, capping out-of-pocket costs and improving price transparency so patients face fewer surprise bills.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

There’s a lot Congress can do to lower prescription drug costs, especially within Medicare. Johnny O supports more aggressive price negotiations, capping out-of-pocket costs and improving price transparency so patients face fewer surprise bills.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Johnny Olszewski Jr. — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Johnny Olszewski Jr.
Care & public health

Johnny O knows that a strong middle class is America’s economic engine — and he’s fighting every day to make sure hardworking families have the tools they need to get ahead, not just get by. He’s pushing for higher wages, affordable healthcare, and strong, fully funded public schools that prepare ev…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Johnny O knows that a strong middle class is America’s economic engine — and he’s fighting every day to make sure hardworking families have the tools they need to get ahead, not just get by. He’s pushing for higher wages, affordable healthcare, and strong, fully funded public schools that prepare every child for success.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Johnny Olszewski Jr. — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Johnny O gets it: if you can’t afford your rent or mortgage, groceries or healthcare, little else matters. He’s laser-focused on lowering costs for struggling families and calling out House leadership for its refusal to take up meaningful legislation to do so.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Johnny O gets it: if you can’t afford your rent or mortgage, groceries or healthcare, little else matters. He’s laser-focused on lowering costs for struggling families and calling out House leadership for its refusal to take up meaningful legislation to do so.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Johnny Olszewski Jr. — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Maryland candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Maryland incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Maryland legislators and Maryland’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Maryland’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

263 matching sponsorships or proposals · 87 Maryland incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Comptroller Brooke Lierman

Comptroller of Maryland · D–MD

1 proposal
View proposals from Comptroller Brooke Lierman
Maryland Legislature · HB 520

Prenatal and Infant Care Coordination - Grant Funding and Task Force

May 25, 2019 · Enacted without signature

Comptroller Brooke Lierman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring the Governor to include $100,000 in the annual budget beginning in fiscal year 2021 for the Maryland Prenatal and Infant Care Coordination Services Grant Program Fund; establishing the Task Force on Maryland Maternal and Child Health; requiring the Task Force to study and make recommendations, including programs that the Maryland Medical Assistance Program should implement; requiring the Task Force to report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly on or before November 1, 2019; etc.

2019-05-25: Enacted under Article II, Section 17(c) of the Maryland Constitution - Chapter 661. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring the Governor to include $100,000 in the annual budget beginning in fiscal year 2021 for the Maryland Prenatal and Infant Care Coordination Services Grant Program Fund; establishing the Task Force on Maryland Maternal and Child Health; requiring the Task Force to study and make recommendations, including programs that the Maryland Medical Assistance Program should implement; requiring the Task Force to report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly on or before November 1, 2019; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Del. Andre V. Johnson, Jr.

Maryland House of Delegates, District 34A · D–MD

1 proposal
View proposals from Del. Andre V. Johnson, Jr.
Maryland Legislature · HB 1287

Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity - BURDEN Analysis (CHERISH Our Communities Act)

Mar 13, 2026 · Did not pass

Del. Andre V. Johnson, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring that an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity for certain generating stations located within a certain at-risk area to include with the application a baseline understanding of risk, disparities, and environmental needs (BURDEN) report describing and including information on certain environmental and public health burdens; altering the contents of a certain notice that must be provided on receipt of an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity; etc.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2026RS session. Final recorded action: 2026-03-13, Hearing 3/13 at 1:30 p.m..

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is nuclear generation divided by all in-state generation. Nuclear development or other in-state generation resources concern this mix; procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from an operating plant or measured output. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring that an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity for certain generating stations located within a certain at-risk area to include with the application a baseline understanding of risk, disparities, and environmental needs (BURDEN) report describing and including information on certain environmental and public health burdens; altering the contents of a certain notice that must be provided on receipt of an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Del. Bernice Mireku-North

Maryland House of Delegates, District 14 · D–MD

7 proposals
View proposals from Del. Bernice Mireku-North
Maryland Legislature · HB 197

Comprehensive Community Safety Funding Act

Feb 10, 2026 · Did not pass

Del. Bernice Mireku-North · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Imposing an excise tax on certain gross receipts of certain firearms dealers derived from the sales of firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition in the State and sales of firearms to residents of the State; requiring the Comptroller to distribute a portion of the tax revenues to the Maryland Violence Intervention Program, the Center for Firearm Violence Prevention, the Coordinated Community Supports Partnership, the Survivors of Homicide Victims Program, the Trauma Physician Services Fund, and the Cowley Shock Trauma Center; etc.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2026RS session. Final recorded action: 2026-02-10, Hearing 3/05 at 1:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Imposing an excise tax on certain gross receipts of certain firearms dealers derived from the sales of firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition in the State and sales of firearms to residents of the State; requiring the Comptroller to distribute a portion of the tax revenues to the Maryland Violence Intervention Program, the Center for Firearm Violence Prevention, the Coordinated Community Supports Partnership, the Survivors of Homicide Victims Program, the Trauma Physician Services Fund, and the Cowley Shock Trauma Center; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 592

Task Force to Study Forced Infant Separation From Incarcerated Individuals

Jan 30, 2026 · Did not pass

Del. Bernice Mireku-North · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Establishing the Task Force to Study Forced Infant Separation From Incarcerated Individuals to study and make recommendations regarding methods to reduce forced infant separation in the State and facilitate bonds between postpartum incarcerated individuals and their children; and requiring the Task Force to report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly on or before December 1, 2027.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2026RS session. Final recorded action: 2026-01-30, Hearing 3/03 at 1:00 p.m. (Judiciary).

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Establishing the Task Force to Study Forced Infant Separation From Incarcerated Individuals to study and make recommendations regarding methods to reduce forced infant separation in the State and facilitate bonds between postpartum incarcerated individuals and their children; and requiring the Task Force to report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly on or before December 1, 2027.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 837

Task Force to Study Forced Infant Separation From Incarcerated Individuals

Feb 17, 2025 · Did not pass

Del. Bernice Mireku-North · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Establishing the Task Force to Study Forced Infant Separation From Incarcerated Individuals to study and make recommendations regarding methods to reduce forced infant separation in the State and facilitate bonds between postpartum incarcerated individuals and their children; and requiring the Task Force to report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly on or before December 1, 2025.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2025RS session. Final recorded action: 2025-02-17, Hearing 2/18 at 11:00 a.m..

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Establishing the Task Force to Study Forced Infant Separation From Incarcerated Individuals to study and make recommendations regarding methods to reduce forced infant separation in the State and facilitate bonds between postpartum incarcerated individuals and their children; and requiring the Task Force to report its findings and recommendations to the General Assembly on or before December 1, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 387

Comprehensive Community Safety Funding Act

Jan 31, 2025 · Did not pass

Del. Bernice Mireku-North · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Would impose an 11% excise tax on specified firearm dealers’ firearm-sale receipts and distribute revenue to designated funds, including the Violence Intervention and Prevention Fund.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2025RS session. Final recorded action: 2025-01-31, Hearing 2/13 at 1:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

The relationship concerns proposed violence-prevention funding. The tax proposal did not become law and does not establish fewer firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 387 Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2025 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE First Reader House Bill 387 (Delegate Mireku - North, et al. ) Ways and Means Comprehensive Community Safety Funding Act This bill establishes an 11% firearm excise tax on the gross receipts of a federally licensed firearms dealer derived from (1) the retail sale of firearms in the State and (2) the retail sale of firearms to State residents from a federally licensed firearms dealer that is located outside the State. The bill requires specified distributions of the revenue from the excise tax. The bill also provides for the filing of specified tax returns and for the administration of the tax by the Comptroller. The bill takes effect July 1, 2027. Fiscal Summary State Effect: Special fund revenues increase by $15.0 million in FY 2028 and by $16.2 million in FY 2030. Special fund expenditures for administrative costs increase by $2.2 million in FY 2028 and by $0.6 million in FY 2030. Future year expenditures reflect annualization and inflation. ($ in millions) FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 SF Revenue $0 $0 $15.0 $15.6 $16.2 SF Expenditure $0 $0 $2.2 $0.6 $0.6 Net Effect $0.0 $0.0 $12.8 $14.9 $15.5 Note: () = decrease; GF = general funds; FF = federal funds; SF = special funds; - = indeterminate increase; (-) = indeterminate decrease Local Effect: None. Small Business Effect: Potential meaningful. Small businesses that sell firearms will be subject to the new excise tax. However, some portion of the cost of the new tax may be passed on to the consumers through increased prices. HB 387/ Page 2 Analysis Bill Summary: The bill establishes an 11% firearm excise tax on the gross receipts of the sale of firearms in the State by a federally licensed firearms dealer located both within the State and outside the State. The bill specifies the distribution of revenue from the excise tax, administration of the excise tax by the Comptroller, filing of excise tax returns by licensed dealers, and the paying of excise taxes by licensed dealers. The excise tax does not apply to the sale of a firearm to (1) a law enforcement agency; (2) the armed forces of the United States; (3) the National Guard; (4) a law enforcement officer; (5) a retired law enforcement officer; or (6) an individual for the exclusive purpose of competition shooting or match shooting. The excise tax applies to (1) a retail sale made on or after July 1, 2027, by a federally licensed firearms dealer that is a large retailer and (2) a retail sale made by any other federally licensed firearms dealer on or after July 1, 2028. For a federally licensed firearms dealer that is located outside the State, the excise tax only applies if the federally licensed firearms dealer, during the previous calendar year or the current calendar year (1) derives gross revenue from the sale of firearms to residents of the State that exceeds $100,000 or (2) sells firearms to residents of the State for delivery into the State in 200 or more separate transactions. Distribution of the Firearm Excise Tax Revenue Revenue from the firearm excise tax must be distributed equally to the following:  the Coordinated Community Supports Partnership Fund;  the Maryland Trauma Physician Services Fund;  the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland Medical System;  the Maryland Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Fund;  the Survivors of Homicide Victims Grant Program within the G overnor’s Office of Crime Prevention and Policy; and  the Center for Firearm Violence Prevention and Intervention within the Maryland Department of Health. The bill specifies that it is the intent of the General Assembly that the excise tax revenue supplement, and not supplant, any other funding for these funds required by law. HB 387/ Page 3 Firearm Excise Tax Returns A federally licensed firearms dealer must complete, under oath, and file an excise tax return with the Comptroller (1) on or before the 25th day of the month that follows the month in which the person sells any firearms within the boundaries of the State or to residents of the State and (2) if specified by the Comptroller, by regulation, on other dates for each month in which the licensee does not sell any firearms in the State or to residents of the State. A person required to file an excise tax return must file with the return an attachment that states any information required by the Comptroller to determine the gross receipts derived from the sales of firearms in the State or to residents of the State. A person required to file an excise tax return must maintain records of the firearms sold in the State or to residents of the State and the basis for the calculation of the excise tax owed. Payment of Firearm Excise Taxes Each person required to file an excise tax return must pay the firearm excise tax in the manner required by the Comptroller, with the return that covers the period in which the person sold firearms in the State or to residents of the State. If a corporation, other than a nonstock, nonprofit corporation, is required to pay the excise tax, personal liability for the tax and interest and penalties on the tax extends to any officer of the corporation who exercises direct control over its fiscal management. If a limited liability company, or limited liability partnership, including a limited partnership registered as a limited liability limited partnership, is required to pay the excise tax, personal liability for the tax and interest and penalties on the tax extends to any person who exercises direct control over the fiscal management of the limited liability company or limited liability partnership. The Comptroller may require a person subject to the firearms excise tax to post security for the excise tax in the amount that the Comptroller determines. A person who willfully fails to file a required firearm excise tax return is guilty of a misdemeanor and, on conviction, is subject to a fine of up to $5,000 or imprisonment of up to five years or both. Definitions A federally licensed firearms dealer is a person licensed by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to deal in firearms. Gross receipts are defined as the total amount of the sale or lease or rental price of the retail sale by a person, valued in money, whether received in money or otherwise, without any deduction for (1) the cost of the property sold; (2) the cost of the materials used, labor or
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 191

Correctional Services - Pregnancy and Postpartum Support (Prevention of Forced Infant Separation Act)

Feb 10, 2024 · Did not pass

Del. Bernice Mireku-North · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring the Division of Correction to allow a certain pregnant woman and a certain woman who recently gave birth to transfer to the prerelease unit for women for 1 year following the birth; establishing the Healthy Start Bonding Program to facilitate strong bonds between incarcerated women and their children; and requiring the Division to allow liberal visitation between certain individuals and certain children under certain circumstances.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2024RS session. Final recorded action: 2024-02-10, Hearing 2/27 at 1:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring the Division of Correction to allow a certain pregnant woman and a certain woman who recently gave birth to transfer to the prerelease unit for women for 1 year following the birth; establishing the Healthy Start Bonding Program to facilitate strong bonds between incarcerated women and their children; and requiring the Division to allow liberal visitation between certain individuals and certain children under certain circumstances.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 935

Comprehensive Community Safety Funding Act

Feb 2, 2024 · Did not pass

Del. Bernice Mireku-North · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Would impose an 11% excise tax on specified firearm, accessory and ammunition sales and distribute revenue to designated funds, including the Violence Intervention and Prevention Fund.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2024RS session. Final recorded action: 2024-02-02, Hearing 2/22 at 1:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

The relationship concerns proposed violence-prevention funding. The tax proposal did not become law and does not establish fewer firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 935 Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2024 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE First Reader House Bill 935 (Delegate Mireku - North, et al. ) Ways and Means Comprehensive Community Safety Funding Act This bill establishes an 11% firearm, firearm accessory, and ammunition (FFAA) excise tax on the gross receipts of a federally licensed firearms dealer derived from the sales of firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition in the State. The bill requires specified distributions of the revenue from the excise tax. The bill provides for the filing of specified tax returns and for the administration of the tax by the Comptroller. The bill takes effect July 1, 2025. Fiscal Summary State Effect: Special fund revenues increase by approximately $22.4 million in FY 2026 and by $25.0 million in FY 2029. Special fund expenditures for administrative costs increase by $3.7 million in FY 2026 and by $716,500 in FY 2029. Future year expenditures reflect annualization and inflation. ($ in millions) FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 SF Revenue $0 $22.4 $23.2 $24.1 $25.0 SF Expenditure $0 $3.7 $0.7 $0.7 $0.7 Net Effect $0.0 $18.7 $22.6 $23.4 $24.3 Note:() = decrease; GF = general funds; FF = federal funds; SF = special funds; - = indeterminate increase; (-) = indeterminate decrease Local Effect: None. Small Business Effect: Potential meaningful. Small businesses that sell firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition will be subject to the new excise tax. However, some portion of the cost of the new tax may be passed on to the consumers through increased prices. HB 935/ Page 2 Analysis Bill Summary: The bill establishes an 11% FFAA excise tax on the gross receipts of the sale of firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition in the State by a federally licensed firearms dealer. The bill specifies the distribution of revenue from the excise tax, administration of the excise tax by the Comptroller, filing of excise tax returns by licensed dealers, and the paying of excise taxes by licensed dealers. Distribution of the Firearm, Firearm Accessory, and Ammunition Excise Tax Revenue Revenue from the FFAA excise tax must be distributed as follows:  44% to the Maryland Trauma Physician Services Fund;  29% to the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland Medical System;  23% to the Violence Intervention and Prevention Program Fund;  2% to the Survivors of Homicide Victims Grant Program within the G overnor’s Office of Crime Prevention and Policy; and  2% to the Center for Firearm Violence Prevention and Intervention within the Maryland Department of Health. The bill specifies that it is the intent of the General Assembly that the excise tax revenue supplement, and not supplant, any other funding for these funds required by law. Firearm, Firearm Accessory, and Ammunition Excise Tax Returns A federally licensed firearms dealer must complete, under oath, and file an FFAA excise tax return with the Comptroller: (1) on or before the 25th day of the month that follows the month in which the person sells any firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition within the boundaries of the State; and (2) if specified by the Comptroller, by regulation, on other dates for each month in which the licensee does not sell any firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition in the State. A person required to file an excise tax return must file with the return an attachment that states any information required by the Comptroller to determine the gross receipts derived from the sales of firearms, firearm accessories, and ammunition in the State. A person required to file an excise tax return must maintain records of the firearms, firearms accessories, and ammunition sold in the State and the basis for the calculation of the FFAA excise tax owed. HB 935/ Page 3 Payment of Firearm, Firearm Accessory, and Ammunition Excise Taxes Each person required to file an excise tax return must pay the FFAA excise tax in the manner required by the Comptroller, with the return that covers the period in which the person sold firearms, firearm accessories, or ammunition in the State. If a corporation, other than a nonstock, nonprofit corporation, is required to pay the FFAA excise tax, personal liability for the tax and interest and penalties on the tax extends to any officer of the corporation who exercises direct control over its fiscal management. If a limited liability company, or limited liability partnership, including a limited partnership registered as a limited liability limited partnership, is required to pay the FFAA excise tax, personal liability for the tax and interest and penalties on the tax extends to any person who exercises direct control over the fiscal management of the limited liability company or limited liability partnership. The Comptroller may require a person subject to the FFAA excise tax to post security for the excise tax in the amount that the Comptroller determines. A person who willfully fails to file a required FFAA excise tax return is guilty of a misdemeanor and, on conviction, is subject to a fine up to $5,000 or imprisonment up of to five years or both. Definitions A federally licensed firearms dealer is a person licensed by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to deal in firearms. A firearm accessory is: (1) a magazine or magazine loader; (2) a firearm scope or optic; (3) a stock; (4) a grip; (5) a handguard; or (6) body armor. Gross receipts are defined as the total amount of the sale or lease or rental price of the retail sale by a person, valued in money, whether received in money or otherwise, without any deduction for: (1) the cost of the property sold; (2) the cost of the materials used, labor or service cost, interest paid, losses, or any other expense; or (3) the cost of transportation of the property. Gross receipts do not include: (1) cash discounts allowed and taken on sales; (2) the sale price of property returned by customers when that amount is refunded in cash or credit unless the customer, in order to obtain the refund, is required to purchase other property at a price greater than the amount charged for the property that is returned; (3) the price received for labor or services used in installing or applying the property sold; and (4) the amount of any tax imposed by the United States, the State, a county, or a municipality on or with respect to retail sales whether imposed on the person or the consumer.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 523

Correctional Services - Pregnancy and Postpartum Support (Prevention of Forced Infant Separation Act)

Feb 1, 2023 · Did not pass

Del. Bernice Mireku-North · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring the Division of Correction to allow a certain pregnant woman and a certain woman who recently gave birth to transfer to the prerelease unit for women for a certain time period; establishing the Healthy Start Bonding Program to facilitate strong bonds between incarcerated women and their children; and requiring the Division to allow liberal visitation between certain individuals and certain children under certain circumstances.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2023RS session. Final recorded action: 2023-02-01, Hearing 2/21 at 1:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring the Division of Correction to allow a certain pregnant woman and a certain woman who recently gave birth to transfer to the prerelease unit for women for a certain time period; establishing the Healthy Start Bonding Program to facilitate strong bonds between incarcerated women and their children; and requiring the Division to allow liberal visitation between certain individuals and certain children under certain circumstances.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Del. Bonnie Cullison

Maryland House of Delegates, District 19 · D–MD

9 proposals
View proposals from Del. Bonnie Cullison
Maryland Legislature · HB 1112

Health Insurance Coverage Protection Commission - Study on Individual and Group Health Insurance Market Stability

Mar 20, 2026 · Did not pass

Del. Bonnie Cullison · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Altering the duties of the Health Insurance Coverage Protection Commission to require the Commission to study and make recommendations regarding individual and group health insurance market stability.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2026RS session. Final recorded action: 2026-03-20, Hearing 3/25 at 1:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

The fact measures whether residents under 65 have insurance. Eligibility, enrollment, and premium assistance concern that status; covered-service or provider-payment changes alone do not establish a change in insured status. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Altering the duties of the Health Insurance Coverage Protection Commission to require the Commission to study and make recommendations regarding individual and group health insurance market stability.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 838

Health Occupations - Licensed Direct-Entry Midwives - Revisions

May 20, 2025 · Enacted

Del. Bonnie Cullison · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Altering the scope of practice of licensed direct-entry midwives; providing that the practice of direct-entry midwifery is independent and not does not require oversight by another health care practitioner; repealing the requirement that licensed direct-entry midwives report certain information to the Direct-Entry Midwifery Advisory Committee; altering the disciplinary actions that may be taken against a licensed direct-entry midwife or an applicant for a license; etc.

2025-05-20: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 645. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Altering the scope of practice of licensed direct-entry midwives; providing that the practice of direct-entry midwifery is independent and not does not require oversight by another health care practitioner; repealing the requirement that licensed direct-entry midwives report certain information to the Direct-Entry Midwifery Advisory Committee; altering the disciplinary actions that may be taken against a licensed direct-entry midwife or an applicant for a license; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 1176

Home- and Community-Based Services Waiver - Eligibility

Feb 14, 2024 · Did not pass

Del. Bonnie Cullison · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Altering the financial eligibility criteria for the home- and community-based services waiver submitted by the Maryland Department of Health to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to include categorically needy individuals with an income disregard up to 300% of the Supplemental Security Income monthly benefit amount and a certain community spouse resource allowance; requiring the Department to adopt regulations to establish a timeline within which the Department is required to approve or deny the application of an applicant; etc.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2024RS session. Final recorded action: 2024-02-14, Hearing 3/01 at 2:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

The fact measures whether residents under 65 have insurance. Eligibility, enrollment, and premium assistance concern that status; covered-service or provider-payment changes alone do not establish a change in insured status. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Altering the financial eligibility criteria for the home- and community-based services waiver submitted by the Maryland Department of Health to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to include categorically needy individuals with an income disregard up to 300% of the Supplemental Security Income monthly benefit amount and a certain community spouse resource allowance; requiring the Department to adopt regulations to establish a timeline within which the Department is required to approve or deny the application of an applicant; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 355

Health Occupations – Licensed Direct–Entry Midwives – Previous Cesarean Section

Feb 5, 2024 · Did not pass

Del. Bonnie Cullison · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allowing a licensed direct-entry midwife to assume or take responsibility for a client who had a previous cesarean section and regulating the circumstances under which the responsibility may be assumed or taken; altering the required contents of a certain informed consent agreement; and requiring the State Board of Nursing, in consultation with certain stakeholders, to develop a transport protocol for clients who had a previous cesarean section.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2024RS session. Final recorded action: 2024-02-05, Withdrawn by Sponsor.

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Allowing a licensed direct-entry midwife to assume or take responsibility for a client who had a previous cesarean section and regulating the circumstances under which the responsibility may be assumed or taken; altering the required contents of a certain informed consent agreement; and requiring the State Board of Nursing, in consultation with certain stakeholders, to develop a transport protocol for clients who had a previous cesarean section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 363

Maryland Health Benefit Exchange and Maryland Department of Health - Health Care and Dental Care Coverage for Undocumented Immigrants - Report

Apr 10, 2023 · Did not pass

Del. Bonnie Cullison · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange and the Maryland Department of Health to develop a report comparing options for offering affordable health care and dental care coverage to State residents who are ineligible for the Maryland Medical Assistance Program, the Maryland Children's Health Program, qualified health plans, or stand-alone dental plans due to the individuals' immigration status; and requiring the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange to report its findings and recommendations by October 31, 2023.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2023RS session. Final recorded action: 2023-04-10, Referred Rules.

Why this record is included

The fact measures whether residents under 65 have insurance. Eligibility, enrollment, and premium assistance concern that status; covered-service or provider-payment changes alone do not establish a change in insured status. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance · Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange and the Maryland Department of Health to develop a report comparing options for offering affordable health care and dental care coverage to State residents who are ineligible for the Maryland Medical Assistance Program, the Maryland Children's Health Program, qualified health plans, or stand-alone dental plans due to the individuals' immigration status; and requiring the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange to report its findings and recommendations by October 31, 2023.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 351

Health Occupations - Licensed Direct-Entry Midwives - Previous Cesarean Section

Mar 3, 2023 · Did not pass

Del. Bonnie Cullison · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allowing a licensed direct-entry midwife to assume or take responsibility for a client who had a previous cesarean section and regulating the circumstances under which the responsibility may be assumed or taken; altering the required contents of a certain informed consent agreement; and requiring the State Board of Nursing, in consultation with certain stakeholders, to develop a transport protocol for clients who had a previous cesarean section.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2023RS session. Final recorded action: 2023-03-03, Referred Finance.

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Allowing a licensed direct-entry midwife to assume or take responsibility for a client who had a previous cesarean section and regulating the circumstances under which the responsibility may be assumed or taken; altering the required contents of a certain informed consent agreement; and requiring the State Board of Nursing, in consultation with certain stakeholders, to develop a transport protocol for clients who had a previous cesarean section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 66

Health Occupations - Licensed Direct-Entry Midwives - Previous Cesarean Section

Jan 25, 2022 · Did not pass

Del. Bonnie Cullison · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allowing a licensed direct-entry midwife to assume or take responsibility for a patient who had a previous cesarean section and regulating the circumstances under which the responsibility may be assumed or taken.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2022RS session. Final recorded action: 2022-01-25, Hearing 2/01 at 1:30 p.m..

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Allowing a licensed direct-entry midwife to assume or take responsibility for a patient who had a previous cesarean section and regulating the circumstances under which the responsibility may be assumed or taken.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 1032

Health Occupations – Licensed Direct–Entry Midwives – Previous Cesarean Section

Feb 12, 2021 · Did not pass

Del. Bonnie Cullison · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Altering the circumstances under which a licensed direct-entry midwife is prohibited from taking certain responsibility for a patient who had a previous cesarean section; and requiring a licensed direct-entry midwife to consult with a health care practitioner and document the consultation if a patient had a previous cesarean section that resulted in a confirmed low transverse incision and was performed at least 18 months before the expected date of birth for the current pregnancy.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2021RS session. Final recorded action: 2021-02-12, Hearing 3/11 at 1:30 p.m..

Why this record is included

Maryland counts deaths during pregnancy or within one year afterward from all causes, not only deaths caused by pregnancy. The provision concerns maternal care, safety, or mortality measurement within that population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Pregnancy-associated deaths reviewed. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Altering the circumstances under which a licensed direct-entry midwife is prohibited from taking certain responsibility for a patient who had a previous cesarean section; and requiring a licensed direct-entry midwife to consult with a health care practitioner and document the consultation if a patient had a previous cesarean section that resulted in a confirmed low transverse incision and was performed at least 18 months before the expected date of birth for the current pregnancy.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 1163

Home- and Community-Based Waiver Services - Alterations and Task Force

Feb 10, 2020 · Did not pass

Del. Bonnie Cullison · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Altering the required contents of a certain waiver submitted by the Maryland Department of Health to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; requiring the Department to send monthly letters to individuals who are eligible or likely to be eligible for waiver participation; requiring that certain letters be sent in a sufficient quantity to allow at least 7,500 individuals to participate in the waiver; requiring the Department to ensure that certain individuals receive certain services within a certain period of time; etc.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2020RS session. Final recorded action: 2020-02-10, Hearing 3/05 at 1:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

The fact measures whether residents under 65 have insurance. Eligibility, enrollment, and premium assistance concern that status; covered-service or provider-payment changes alone do not establish a change in insured status. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Altering the required contents of a certain waiver submitted by the Maryland Department of Health to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; requiring the Department to send monthly letters to individuals who are eligible or likely to be eligible for waiver participation; requiring that certain letters be sent in a sufficient quantity to allow at least 7,500 individuals to participate in the waiver; requiring the Department to ensure that certain individuals receive certain services within a certain period of time; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Del. Dana Stein

Maryland House of Delegates, District 11B · D–MD

4 proposals
View proposals from Del. Dana Stein
Maryland Legislature · HB 659

Firearm Safety - Storage Requirements and Youth Suicide Prevention (Jaelynn's Law)

Feb 3, 2022 · Did not pass

Del. Dana Stein · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Altering a certain provision relating to the storage of firearms and ammunition in a location that can be accessed by an unsupervised minor; and requiring the Deputy Secretary for Public Health Services to develop a youth suicide prevention and firearm safe storage guide, with recommendations from a stakeholder committee.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2022RS session. Final recorded action: 2022-02-03, Hearing 2/23 at 1:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Altering a certain provision relating to the storage of firearms and ammunition in a location that can be accessed by an unsupervised minor; and requiring the Deputy Secretary for Public Health Services to develop a youth suicide prevention and firearm safe storage guide, with recommendations from a stakeholder committee.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 200

Public Safety - Access to Firearms - Storage Requirements (Jaelynn's Law)

Feb 5, 2021 · Did not pass

Del. Dana Stein · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Altering a certain prohibition to prohibit a person from storing or leaving a firearm in a location where a minor could gain access to the firearm; altering a certain exception to the prohibition; establishing certain exceptions to the prohibition; prohibiting a person from storing or leaving a firearm in a location where an unsupervised minor could gain access to the firearm, an unsupervised minor does gain access to the firearm, and the firearm causes harm to the minor or another person; establishing certain penalties; etc.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2021RS session. Final recorded action: 2021-02-05, Hearing 3/01 at 1:30 p.m..

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Altering a certain prohibition to prohibit a person from storing or leaving a firearm in a location where a minor could gain access to the firearm; altering a certain exception to the prohibition; establishing certain exceptions to the prohibition; prohibiting a person from storing or leaving a firearm in a location where an unsupervised minor could gain access to the firearm, an unsupervised minor does gain access to the firearm, and the firearm causes harm to the minor or another person; establishing certain penalties; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 636

Public Safety - Access to Firearms - Storage Requirements

Feb 3, 2020 · Did not pass

Del. Dana Stein · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Altering a certain prohibition to prohibit a person from storing or leaving a loaded or unloaded firearm in a location where a minor could gain access to the firearm; repealing a certain exception to the prohibition; prohibiting a person from storing or leaving a loaded or unloaded firearm in a location where an unsupervised minor could gain access to the firearm and an unsupervised minor does gain access to the firearm; etc.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2020RS session. Final recorded action: 2020-02-03, Hearing 2/19 at 1:00 p.m..

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Altering a certain prohibition to prohibit a person from storing or leaving a loaded or unloaded firearm in a location where a minor could gain access to the firearm; repealing a certain exception to the prohibition; prohibiting a person from storing or leaving a loaded or unloaded firearm in a location where an unsupervised minor could gain access to the firearm and an unsupervised minor does gain access to the firearm; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 468

Public Safety - Access to Firearms - Storage Requirements

Feb 1, 2019 · Did not pass

Del. Dana Stein · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prohibiting a person from storing or leaving a loaded or unloaded firearm in a location where a child could gain access to the firearm unless the firearm is locked by a certain safety lock or is secured in a container that is capable of preventing an unintended person from gaining access to the contents; altering the definition of "child" to be an individual under the age of 18 years instead of 16 years; and providing a penalty for a violation of the Act of imprisonment not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $1,000 or both.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2019RS session. Final recorded action: 2019-02-01, Hearing 2/25 at 10:00 a.m..

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Prohibiting a person from storing or leaving a loaded or unloaded firearm in a location where a child could gain access to the firearm unless the firearm is locked by a certain safety lock or is secured in a container that is capable of preventing an unintended person from gaining access to the contents; altering the definition of "child" to be an individual under the age of 18 years instead of 16 years; and providing a penalty for a violation of the Act of imprisonment not exceeding 2 years or a fine not exceeding $1,000 or both.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Del. David Moon

Maryland House of Delegates, District 20 · D–MD

2 proposals
View proposals from Del. David Moon
Maryland Legislature · HB 794

Regulated Firearms - Maryland Voluntary Do Not Sell Firearm Process

Feb 21, 2024 · Did not pass

Del. David Moon · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring the Maryland Department of Health to create and maintain a Maryland Voluntary Do Not Sell Firearm Registry in which a person may voluntarily enroll for the purpose of being prohibited from obtaining a regulated firearm by December 31, 2024; prohibiting a dealer or other person from selling, renting, loaning, or transferring a regulated firearm to a purchaser, lessee, borrower, or transferee who the dealer or other person knows or has reason to believe is registered on the registry; etc.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2024RS session. Final recorded action: 2024-02-21, Hearing 2/21 at 1:30 p.m..

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring the Maryland Department of Health to create and maintain a Maryland Voluntary Do Not Sell Firearm Registry in which a person may voluntarily enroll for the purpose of being prohibited from obtaining a regulated firearm by December 31, 2024; prohibiting a dealer or other person from selling, renting, loaning, or transferring a regulated firearm to a purchaser, lessee, borrower, or transferee who the dealer or other person knows or has reason to believe is registered on the registry; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 162

Firearms - Maryland Voluntary Do Not Sell Firearm Registry - Establishment

Mar 15, 2023 · Did not pass

Del. David Moon · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring the Maryland Department of Health to create and maintain a Maryland Voluntary Do Not Sell Firearm Registry in which a person may voluntarily enroll for the purpose of being prohibited from obtaining a firearm; prohibiting a dealer or other person from selling, renting, loaning, or transferring a firearm to a purchaser, lessee, borrower, or transferee who the dealer or other person knows or has reason to believe is registered on the registry; etc.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2023RS session. Final recorded action: 2023-03-15, Referred Judicial Proceedings.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring the Maryland Department of Health to create and maintain a Maryland Voluntary Do Not Sell Firearm Registry in which a person may voluntarily enroll for the purpose of being prohibited from obtaining a firearm; prohibiting a dealer or other person from selling, renting, loaning, or transferring a firearm to a purchaser, lessee, borrower, or transferee who the dealer or other person knows or has reason to believe is registered on the registry; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Maryland officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Maryland statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.