Maine · individual fact

Maine health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages5.5%2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 657.1%2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6573.8%2024 · #19 of 50 · highest first

Maine over time

Explore Maine readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Maine officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Maine effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Maine change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Maine · source units
MainePublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 5.5%4.5%7.8%11.1%Maine, 2014: 10.1%Maine, 2015: 8.4%Maine, 2016: 8%Maine, 2017: 8.1%Maine, 2018: 8%Maine, 2019: 8%Maine, 2021: 5.7%Maine, 2022: 6.6%Maine, 2023: 5.9%Maine, 2024: 5.5%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 23National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsMaine · Lewiston mass shooting · 2023-10-25Lewiston mass shootingMaine · Lewiston investigative commission established · 2023-11-09Lewiston investigative commission establishedNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Maine Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Maine delegation · 2◆ Governor · 3■ Maine agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2010-03-012026-06-30

6 of 6 reviewed Maine actions match · 6 date markers shown. 23 major events shown separately.

Maine · 2024: 5.5% · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Maine Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodMaineRankU.S. benchmark
20245.5%#39 of 508.2%
20235.9%#34 of 50Not available
20226.6%#27 of 50Not available
20215.7%#36 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20198%#25 of 50Not available
20188%#25 of 50Not available
20178.1%#25 of 50Not available
20168%#25 of 50Not available
20158.4%#27 of 50Not available
201410.1%#27 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Maine · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Maine · 20245.5%
Maine rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maine
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Maine4.8%7.8%10.8%20142024
2024 · Maine: 5.5% · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maine Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodMaineCompare
201410.1%
20158.4%
20168%
20178.1%
20188%
20198%
2020Not available
20215.7%
20226.6%
20235.9%
20245.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · 5.5%2024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine · your comparison5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

7.1%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Maine’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
Maine · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Maine with every state.

Maine · 2020$12,077
Maine rank#9among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maine
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Maine$7.32K$10.01K$12.7K20142020
2020 · Maine: $12,077 · Rank #9 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maine Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodMaineCompare
2014$9,115
2015$9,591
2016$10,018
2017$10,399
2018$10,950
2019$11,488
2020$12,077

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · $12,0772020 · Rank #9 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine · your comparison$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maine · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Maine · 202276.6 years
Maine rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Maine population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maine
Life expectancy at birth history in Maine76.3 years77.6 years78.9 years20182022
2022 · Maine: 76.6 years · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maine Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodMaineCompare
201878.6 years
201978.3 years
202077.8 years
202176.7 years
202276.6 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · 76.6 years2022 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine · your comparison76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maine · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Maine · 20239%
Maine rank#37among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maine
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Maine7.8%9.5%11.2%20192023
2023 · Maine: 9% · Rank #37 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maine Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodMaineCompare
20198.8%
20208.3%
20218.2%
20229.1%
20239%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · 9%2023 · Rank #37 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 8.4% – 9.7%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine · your comparison9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maine · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Maine · June 30, 202656%
Maine rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · 56%June 30, 2026 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine · your comparison56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maine · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Maine · 2020$7,496
Maine rank#9among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · $7,4962020 · Rank #9 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine · your comparison$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maine · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Maine · 2023–202426.7%
Maine rank#8among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maine · 26.7%2023–2024 · Rank #8 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine · your comparison26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Maine candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

48 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Maine Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 29 statements

Bobby Charles

1 statement

Republican · Governor · ME

Care & public health

Maine is being overrun by drug cartels, and radical policy failures from Democratic leadership have enabled this crisis. As Governor, Bobby Charles will dismantle cartel networks operating inside and across our borders. He will strengthen law enforcement, increase support for addiction recovery and …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Maine is being overrun by drug cartels, and radical policy failures from Democratic leadership have enabled this crisis. As Governor, Bobby Charles will dismantle cartel networks operating inside and across our borders. He will strengthen law enforcement, increase support for addiction recovery and mental health services, and ensure our communities are no longer losing loved ones to violence and overdose.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Bobby Charles — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Hannah Pingree

21 statements

Democratic · Governor · ME

Health coverage

Launch a public health insurance option: Create a state-backed plan that puts patients before profits. One that doesn’t replace existing coverage, but adds an affordable alternative that consumers can choose and businesses can offer workers. Developed with state leaders and residents, it will answer…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Launch a public health insurance option: Create a state-backed plan that puts patients before profits. One that doesn’t replace existing coverage, but adds an affordable alternative that consumers can choose and businesses can offer workers. Developed with state leaders and residents, it will answer to the people of Maine, not corporate shareholders, and help counter skyrocketing premiums caused by Republican attacks on the ACA.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 20 more statements from Hannah Pingree
Health coverage

From upending the public health system to attacking reproductive health care to cutting Medicaid and tax credits that lower premiums, Washington’s actions are harming Maine families. Congress must reform the health system – we need universal and affordable care for all Americans. But states can’t wa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

From upending the public health system to attacking reproductive health care to cutting Medicaid and tax credits that lower premiums, Washington’s actions are harming Maine families. Congress must reform the health system – we need universal and affordable care for all Americans. But states can’t wait for Washington. Hannah Pingree will partner with other strong governors to pursue solutions while using the power of state government to start fixing what’s broken and putting patients first.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Health coverage

Launch a Public Health Insurance Option: As Governor, Hannah will create a public health insurance option: a State-backed plan that puts patients before profits. This plan won’t replace any other forms of insurance, but it will add a new affordable, reliable alternative that consumers can choose and…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Launch a Public Health Insurance Option: As Governor, Hannah will create a public health insurance option: a State-backed plan that puts patients before profits. This plan won’t replace any other forms of insurance, but it will add a new affordable, reliable alternative that consumers can choose and businesses can offer to their workers. Hannah’s plan, developed in partnership with state leaders and residents, will answer to the people of Maine, not corporate shareholders, and help offset the skyrocketing premiums resulting from Republicans’ attack on the Affordable Care Act.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Health coverage

Hold the System Accountable: Maine can do more to reduce price gouging, profit skimming, and unnecessary complexity and barriers to coverage and care. Hannah’s plan will: Crack down on corporate and private equity buy-outs of health facilities that lead to loss of critical services, gaps in underser…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

Hold the System Accountable: Maine can do more to reduce price gouging, profit skimming, and unnecessary complexity and barriers to coverage and care. Hannah’s plan will: Crack down on corporate and private equity buy-outs of health facilities that lead to loss of critical services, gaps in underserved areas, and higher prices; Demand more from health insurers, health systems, and corporations that receive Maine taxpayer dollars or tax breaks, including strong efforts to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse in the system; Make prescription drugs more affordable for Maine families by lowering out of pocket costs and protecting patients from unfair and unpredictable price increases. Reduce drug costs by expanding bulk and multi-state purchasing agreements, increasing transparency around drug pricing and rebates, and pursue state-level authority to limit excessive price hikes on essential medications. Leverage the negotiating power of state government, Maine’s largest employer, to reduce prescription drug prices for State workers by capping prices based on Medicare negotiation and other rates and support other large employers to do the same; Reduce paperwork and place limits on prior authorization that put distance between patients and their doctors and waste time and money for both; and Improve the process to enroll in MaineCare and CoverME.gov to maintain the gains Maine has made in getting people covered.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Health coverage

Make prescription drugs more affordable: Lower out-of-pocket costs through expanded bulk and multi-state purchasing, greater pricing transparency, and state authority to limit excessive price hikes on essential medications. Use the state’s purchasing power as Maine’s largest employer to cap drug pri…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Make prescription drugs more affordable: Lower out-of-pocket costs through expanded bulk and multi-state purchasing, greater pricing transparency, and state authority to limit excessive price hikes on essential medications. Use the state’s purchasing power as Maine’s largest employer to cap drug prices for state workers based on Medicare rates, and support other large employers to do the same.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Health coverage

Coverage We Can Afford: Create a public health insurance option that answers to Maine people instead of corporations, increase accountability for health care players, and reduce wasteful complexity across the system.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Coverage We Can Afford: Create a public health insurance option that answers to Maine people instead of corporations, increase accountability for health care players, and reduce wasteful complexity across the system.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Care & public health

Boost tuition assistance and loan repayment for critical workforce needs by expanding support for students and workers entering high-need fields—such as health care, education, and skilled trades—with targeted incentives for those who serve in rural and underserved communities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

Boost tuition assistance and loan repayment for critical workforce needs by expanding support for students and workers entering high-need fields—such as health care, education, and skilled trades—with targeted incentives for those who serve in rural and underserved communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Care & public health

Lower the barriers that hold back wages and workforce participation: Tackling the rising costs of child care, housing, transportation, and health care—so workers can take better jobs, increase their hours, and fully participate in the economy without being priced out of opportunity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Lower the barriers that hold back wages and workforce participation: Tackling the rising costs of child care, housing, transportation, and health care—so workers can take better jobs, increase their hours, and fully participate in the economy without being priced out of opportunity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Healthcare costs

Lower health care costs for small businesses by giving them access to the same high-quality, cost-saving tools used by the state and larger employers—including preventative health programs, virtual physical therapy, and virtual urgent care reduce health costs and keep workers healthy.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Lower health care costs for small businesses by giving them access to the same high-quality, cost-saving tools used by the state and larger employers—including preventative health programs, virtual physical therapy, and virtual urgent care reduce health costs and keep workers healthy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Healthcare costs

Expand training and re-employment support for unemployed and underemployed Mainers, while directly addressing the obstacles that hold people back—health care costs, transportation, housing, and lack of child care.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Expand training and re-employment support for unemployed and underemployed Mainers, while directly addressing the obstacles that hold people back—health care costs, transportation, housing, and lack of child care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Care & public health

By partnering with unions, employers, and education institutions, Hannah will expand access to ongoing education and training that matches the jobs driving Maine’s economy today and tomorrow. These programs will promote flexible, hands-on learning for workers at all stages, prioritizing credentials,…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts

Candidate campaign source

By partnering with unions, employers, and education institutions, Hannah will expand access to ongoing education and training that matches the jobs driving Maine’s economy today and tomorrow. These programs will promote flexible, hands-on learning for workers at all stages, prioritizing credentials, apprenticeships, and real-world experience in key sectors like construction, health care, manufacturing, and clean energy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Care & public health

Prevention saves money: The least expensive health care is the care that catches problems early. Hannah will expand access to primary care in rural and underserved communities, and strengthen maternity and reproductive health services so Maine families get the support they need at every stage of lif…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Prevention saves money: The least expensive health care is the care that catches problems early. Hannah will expand access to primary care in rural and underserved communities, and strengthen maternity and reproductive health services so Maine families get the support they need at every stage of life — reducing long-term costs for families and the health care system alike. Read Hannah’s full Health Care for Maine plan here.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Promote healthy families by giving parents the tools and services to grow and thrive, manage stress and encourage connection through access to local systems of support like school-based health services and mental health care treatment; and

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

Promote healthy families by giving parents the tools and services to grow and thrive, manage stress and encourage connection through access to local systems of support like school-based health services and mental health care treatment; and

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Care & public health

Hold Polluters Accountable: Champion a Maine Climate Superfund Act so fossil fuel companies pay for the damages they caused, not Maine taxpayers. Require full manufacturer disclosure and responsibility for cleanup of toxic PFAS, continuing Hannah’s long record of protecting public health and holding…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts

Candidate campaign source

Hold Polluters Accountable: Champion a Maine Climate Superfund Act so fossil fuel companies pay for the damages they caused, not Maine taxpayers. Require full manufacturer disclosure and responsibility for cleanup of toxic PFAS, continuing Hannah’s long record of protecting public health and holding chemical companies accountable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Care & public health

Care Where and When We Need It: Incentivize and expand primary, maternity, and reproductive health care, foster new models that make the most of our health care professionals, and continue improving access to mental health and substance use care, especially in rural Maine.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Care Where and When We Need It: Incentivize and expand primary, maternity, and reproductive health care, foster new models that make the most of our health care professionals, and continue improving access to mental health and substance use care, especially in rural Maine.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Care & public health

Hannah Pingree believes there’s more to be done for Maine people. As Governor, she will take immediate, practical steps to lower costs for Maine people. That means tackling housing and energy bills, making health care and childcare accessible, and restructuring Maine’s tax system so the wealthiest p…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Hannah Pingree believes there’s more to be done for Maine people. As Governor, she will take immediate, practical steps to lower costs for Maine people. That means tackling housing and energy bills, making health care and childcare accessible, and restructuring Maine’s tax system so the wealthiest pay their fair share and working families can afford their property taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Health Care Workforce: Across rural Maine, an aging health workforce is reducing access to primary, maternity, behavioral health, and reproductive care. This is both a health care crisis and a barrier to attracting families and supporting rural economic growth. Hannah will expand the rural health wo…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Health Care Workforce: Across rural Maine, an aging health workforce is reducing access to primary, maternity, behavioral health, and reproductive care. This is both a health care crisis and a barrier to attracting families and supporting rural economic growth. Hannah will expand the rural health workforce through training pipelines, partnering with employers to upskill and retain workers, and helping providers practice at the top of their license. She will also modernize care delivery by expanding telehealth, support the use of digital tools to reduce administrative burden on clinicians, and encourage more rural innovations like the rural paramedics who also support home-care visits. Innovation can help expand access, improve care, and help stabilize rural health systems across Maine.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Care & public health

Lowering the cost of housing and energy is not enough if families cannot afford health care, childcare or food. Hannah’s plan addresses all three as essentials, not extras.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living

Candidate campaign source

Lowering the cost of housing and energy is not enough if families cannot afford health care, childcare or food. Hannah’s plan addresses all three as essentials, not extras.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Invest in Emergency Management & Public Health: Strengthen state and local capacity to protect vulnerable populations during acute crises like heatwaves, storms, and public health emergencies and chronic health challenges like asthma and tick-borne illnesses – especially for our seniors and people w…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lead the Nation on Climate Action and Resilience

Candidate campaign source

Invest in Emergency Management & Public Health: Strengthen state and local capacity to protect vulnerable populations during acute crises like heatwaves, storms, and public health emergencies and chronic health challenges like asthma and tick-borne illnesses – especially for our seniors and people with disabilities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Care & public health

Continue to expand access to mental health care by integrating primary and mental health care, increasing certified community clinics, fully staffing crisis hotlines, establishing crisis receiving centers to avoid unnecessary hospitalizations or incarceration, and deploying mobile crisis teams that …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Continue to expand access to mental health care by integrating primary and mental health care, increasing certified community clinics, fully staffing crisis hotlines, establishing crisis receiving centers to avoid unnecessary hospitalizations or incarceration, and deploying mobile crisis teams that provide urgent care directly in homes and communities; and

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Care & public health

Expand apprenticeships and industry partnerships in high-demand sectors by working directly with unions and employers to create paid, hands-on training pathways in fields like health care, construction, advanced manufacturing, and the marine economy—ensuring workers can earn while they learn and bus…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce development

Candidate campaign source

Expand apprenticeships and industry partnerships in high-demand sectors by working directly with unions and employers to create paid, hands-on training pathways in fields like health care, construction, advanced manufacturing, and the marine economy—ensuring workers can earn while they learn and businesses can fill critical workforce gaps.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Hannah Pingree — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗

Rick Bennett

7 statements

Independent · Governor · ME

Healthcare costs

You should not have to fight through a broken system just to see a doctor, afford a prescription, or pay off a medical bill. Right now health care costs too much, delivers too little, and leaves too many families behind while government mismanagement, delayed payments, and a lack of accountability m…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: AND DRIVING DOWN COSTS

Candidate campaign source

You should not have to fight through a broken system just to see a doctor, afford a prescription, or pay off a medical bill. Right now health care costs too much, delivers too little, and leaves too many families behind while government mismanagement, delayed payments, and a lack of accountability make the problem worse. As Governor, I will fix the foundation first, lower costs, and build a system that works for patients, families, and providers - and works better for you when your family needs care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
View 6 more statements from Rick Bennett
Care & public health

Maine cannot keep paying for failure at the most expensive point of crisis. Too many people end up cycling through emergency rooms, jails, and long waitlists because they cannot get help early enough. As Governor, I will invest in a prevention-first system by funding mobile crisis teams, expanding t…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Keeping Mainers Healthy

Candidate campaign source

Maine cannot keep paying for failure at the most expensive point of crisis. Too many people end up cycling through emergency rooms, jails, and long waitlists because they cannot get help early enough. As Governor, I will invest in a prevention-first system by funding mobile crisis teams, expanding telepsychiatry, strengthening mental health and addiction care, and growing the health care workforce so people can get treatment sooner, closer to home, and before a crisis becomes more costly for families and taxpayers in every part of Maine .

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Healthcare costs

#3. Launch the medical debt relief program

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Keeping Mainers Healthy

Candidate campaign source

#3. Launch the medical debt relief program

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Healthcare costs

#3. Launch the medical debt relief program Too many Maine families are doing everything right and still getting crushed by medical debt, even when they have insurance. That debt follows people for years, making it harder to buy a home, save for the future, or simply get back on their feet. As Govern…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Keeping Mainers Healthy

Candidate campaign source

#3. Launch the medical debt relief program Too many Maine families are doing everything right and still getting crushed by medical debt, even when they have insurance. That debt follows people for years, making it harder to buy a home, save for the future, or simply get back on their feet. As Governor, I will launch a Medical Debt Relief Program with a one-time $2 million investment that could wipe out up to $200 million in medical debt for tens of thousands of Mainers, giving working families real breathing room and a fairershot at financial stability for themselves and their children.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Care & public health

#2. Invest in a prevention first approach to lower costs Maine cannot keep paying for failure at the most expensive point of crisis. Too many people end up cycling through emergency rooms, jails, and long waitlists because they cannot get help early enough. As Governor, I will invest in a prevention…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Keeping Mainers Healthy

Candidate campaign source

#2. Invest in a prevention first approach to lower costs Maine cannot keep paying for failure at the most expensive point of crisis. Too many people end up cycling through emergency rooms, jails, and long waitlists because they cannot get help early enough. As Governor, I will invest in a prevention-first system by funding mobile crisis teams, expanding telepsychiatry, strengthening mental health and addiction care, and growing the health care workforce so people can get treatment sooner, closer to home, and before a crisis becomes more costly for families and taxpayers in every part of Maine .

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Care & public health

As Governor, my commitment is to you, your family and the future of our state. I will be relentlessly focused on delivering results - from housing, taxes, energy, health care, and child care to the basic job of making government work for you.. I am laying out exactly what I will do as Governor to cu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: CUT THE COSTS CRUSHING MAINE FAMILIES

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, my commitment is to you, your family and the future of our state. I will be relentlessly focused on delivering results - from housing, taxes, energy, health care, and child care to the basic job of making government work for you.. I am laying out exactly what I will do as Governor to cut costs, lower your bills, and grow economic opportunity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗
Healthcare costs

Too many Maine families are doing everything right and still getting crushed by medical debt, even when they have insurance. That debt follows people for years, making it harder to buy a home, save for the future, or simply get back on their feet. As Governor, I will launch a Medical Debt Relief Pro…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Keeping Mainers Healthy

Candidate campaign source

Too many Maine families are doing everything right and still getting crushed by medical debt, even when they have insurance. That debt follows people for years, making it harder to buy a home, save for the future, or simply get back on their feet. As Governor, I will launch a Medical Debt Relief Program with a one-time $2 million investment that could wipe out up to $200 million in medical debt for tens of thousands of Mainers, giving working families real breathing room and a fairershot at financial stability for themselves and their children.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Rick Bennett campaign source 3 ↗

2026 Maine U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Chellie Pingree

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · ME

Care & public health

Pingree Opposes Funding Deal that Capitulates on Affordable Health Care

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Constituent Services

Government-published candidate material

Pingree Opposes Funding Deal that Capitulates on Affordable Health Care

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Chellie Pingree — official congressional primary source 5 ↗

Ron Russell

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · ME

Care & public health

America faces a worsening mental health crisis, and the systems that connect mental health records to firearm background checks are both inconsistent and incomplete. We must close these information gaps while safeguarding individual privacy, due process, and the rights of responsible gun owners—espe…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: (207) 604-3491

Candidate campaign source

America faces a worsening mental health crisis, and the systems that connect mental health records to firearm background checks are both inconsistent and incomplete. We must close these information gaps while safeguarding individual privacy, due process, and the rights of responsible gun owners—especially Veterans who seek mental health care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ron Russell campaign source 12 ↗
View 1 more statement from Ron Russell
Care & public health

I support targeted reforms that improve background check integration, expand mental health resources, and strengthen interagency coordination without infringing on constitutional rights. Our policy focus should be on fixing the systems that fail to identify individuals in crisis, ensuring that those…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

I support targeted reforms that improve background check integration, expand mental health resources, and strengthen interagency coordination without infringing on constitutional rights. Our policy focus should be on fixing the systems that fail to identify individuals in crisis, ensuring that those who present a real danger receive timely intervention and care. I oppose any effort to impose burdensome gun control measures that criminalize responsible citizens and will continue advocating for meaningful solutions that both protect public safety and preserve the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ron Russell campaign source 12 ↗

2026 Maine U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 10 statements

Matt Dunlap

6 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · ME

Health coverage

Enact Medicare for All.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health Care

Candidate campaign source

Enact Medicare for All.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Dunlap — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 5 more statements from Matt Dunlap
Health coverage

Protect Medicaid coverage and funding.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Medicaid

Candidate campaign source

Protect Medicaid coverage and funding.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Dunlap — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Health coverage

Protect Medicare benefits and access.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Medicare

Candidate campaign source

Protect Medicare benefits and access.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Dunlap — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Health coverage

More often than any other issue, I hear worries about affordable health care. Paul LePage supported the Medicaid cuts that are leaving too many Mainers without care and forcing hospitals across the state to shut down maternity wards and other clinics. Meanwhile Big Pharma keeps jacking up the price …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

More often than any other issue, I hear worries about affordable health care. Paul LePage supported the Medicaid cuts that are leaving too many Mainers without care and forcing hospitals across the state to shut down maternity wards and other clinics. Meanwhile Big Pharma keeps jacking up the price of lifesaving drugs, leaving them out of reach at a time when families are struggling to pay the bills. In Congress, I’ll be a champion for protecting Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid, and I’ll work to fight to expand coverage so more people have the care they need. Medicare for All will help us ensure that we’re spending your tax dollars on health care for Mainers rather than foreign wars or other misguided priorities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Dunlap — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

I will always stand up for a woman’s right to make her own health decisions, especially regarding reproductive health and safety. The decision to terminate a pregnancy belongs to the woman faced with whatever circumstances that affect her, and no one should have the right to predetermine what health…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

I will always stand up for a woman’s right to make her own health decisions, especially regarding reproductive health and safety. The decision to terminate a pregnancy belongs to the woman faced with whatever circumstances that affect her, and no one should have the right to predetermine what health choices any woman makes. Safe access to reproductive health care should be a constitutional right.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Dunlap — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Establish safe access to reproductive health care as a constitutional right.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive Rights

Candidate campaign source

Establish safe access to reproductive health care as a constitutional right.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Matt Dunlap — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Paul LePage

4 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · ME

Health coverage

Protect Social Security and Medicare

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fighting for Maine's Future

Candidate campaign source

Protect Social Security and Medicare

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Paul LePage — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 3 more statements from Paul LePage
Health coverage

‍Paul has always protected, and will always protect, Social Security and Medicare.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Protecting Social Security and Medicare

Candidate campaign source

‍Paul has always protected, and will always protect, Social Security and Medicare.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Paul LePage — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Health coverage

Protecting Social Security and Medicare‍Paul has always protected, and will always protect, Social Security and Medicare.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

Protecting Social Security and Medicare‍Paul has always protected, and will always protect, Social Security and Medicare.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Paul LePage — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Care & public health

Standing Up for Our Veterans‍Paul and Ann LePage have spent years working on behalf of Veterans organizations and charities in Maine. In Congress, Paul will fight to protect Veterans healthcare and the benefits earned by the men and women who served.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Standing Up for Our Veterans‍Paul and Ann LePage have spent years working on behalf of Veterans organizations and charities in Maine. In Congress, Paul will fight to protect Veterans healthcare and the benefits earned by the men and women who served.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Paul LePage — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Maine candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Maine incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Maine legislators and Maine’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Maine’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Maine incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Lori Gramlich

Maine House of Representatives, District 131 · D–ME

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Lori Gramlich
Maine Legislature · LD 1187

An Act to Include Certain Mental Health Assessment Data in Firearm Fatalities and Hospitalizations Reports

Apr 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 711

Rep. Lori Gramlich · Sponsored / Sen. Henry L. Ingwersen · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mana Abdi · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael Brennan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Victoria Doudera · Co-sponsored / Rep. Julia McCabe · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michele Meyer · Co-sponsored / Rep. Melanie Sachs · Co-sponsored / Rep. Samuel Zager · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LD 1187 adds aggregate information to the annual firearm fatalities and hospitalizations report: the number of medical-practitioner risk assessments under the specified law, referrals for mental-health treatment and services, and demographic information that can be released without identifying individuals. It does not classify those assessments or referrals as firearm deaths, create a new CDC mortality measure or demonstrate fewer deaths.

Law chapter 711, approved 2026-04-15. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The CDC fact measures age-adjusted firearm deaths across intents. Adding risk-assessment information to Maine’s firearm fatalities and hospitalizations report concerns related monitoring. Assessments, referrals and hospitalizations are not deaths and do not alter the CDC measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maine evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 5. 22 MRSA §1425, sub-§3 is enacted to read: 3. Risk assessments. The number of assessments by a medical practitioner performed pursuant to Title 34-B, section 3862-A, the number of individuals assessed who received a referral for mental health treatment and services and any aggregate demographic information about the individuals assessed that can be released without risking individual identification.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Angus S. King, Jr.

U.S. Senate, Maine · I–ME

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Angus S. King, Jr.
U.S. Congress · Maine delegation · S 585

Servicemember to Veteran Health Care Connection Act of 2025

May 21, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Angus S. King, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 585 proposes automatic pre-transition VA health-care registration at least 180 days before anticipated military separation, followed by assistance with enrollment within 30 days after separation or as soon as feasible. Final enrollment still depends on eligibility and the individual’s choice; registration alone is not insurance enrollment. The bill remains in Congress. This connection is limited to eligible veterans under 65 within the uninsured fact’s population.

Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 119-86. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures the uninsured share of residents under 65. Enrollment assistance for eligible veterans concerns VA health coverage for a subset of that population; pre-registration alone is not enrollment or proof of fewer uninsured residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maine evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Pre-transition health care registration of members of the Armed Forces to streamline receipt of health care from Department of Veterans Affairs(a)Health care pre-Registration(1)In generalSubchapter I of chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1705A the following new section:1705B.Management of health care: registration in pre-transition system and facilitation of enrollment(a)Pre-Transition system(1)In generalNot later than 180 days before the anticipated separation from the Armed Forces of a member of the Armed Forces, the Secretary shall automatically register such member in the pre-transition health care registration system.(2)RegistrationRegistration of a member of the Armed Forces in the pre-transition health care registration system under paragraph (1) shall consist of the entry of relevant information of such member into such system so as to facilitate and permit, at a future date, a final determination with respect to the enrollment of such member in the patient enrollment system if such member elects to enroll in the patient enrollment system and is eligible to enroll in the patient enrollment system.(b)Facilitation of enrollment in patient enrollment system(1)In generalNot later than 30 days after separation of a covered individual from the Armed Forces, or as soon as feasibly possible following such separation, the Secretary shall engage with such individual—(A)to assist and facilitate the completion of the process for enrollment of such individual in the patient enrollment system, to include the appropriate electronic or paper forms; and(B)to schedule an initial primary care or other health appointment for such individual under the laws administered by the Secretary if the individual is interested in such an appointment.(2)Communication effortsCommunication to a covered individual under paragraph (1) shall be conducted through a combination of effective mechanisms to include by electronic means through email and text message, paper mail, and by phone.(3)Covered individual definedIn this subsection, the term covered individual means an individual who—(A)is eligible for or expected to be eligible for enrollment in the patient enrollment system; and(B)is not yet enrolled in such system.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Susan M. Collins

U.S. Senate, Maine · R–ME

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Susan M. Collins
U.S. Congress · Maine delegation · S 3924

We Can't Wait Act of 2026

Feb 25, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Susan M. Collins · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 3924 proposes letting eligible disabled people below early retirement age elect Social Security disability benefits during the waiting period in exchange for reduced benefits throughout that period of eligibility. For initial entitlement in the program’s first 36 months, the benefit factor would be 94.25%; later cohorts would use certified actuarial factors. Other people’s benefits on the worker’s record would be unaffected. The bill remains in Congress and establishes no new payments or Maine beneficiary increase.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts OASDI beneficiaries in current payment. An option for earlier disability-insurance benefits concerns the disability component of OASDI, not SSI, Medicare, all beneficiaries or a demonstrated increase in Maine’s beneficiary count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maine evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Election to receive(a)In generalSection 223(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423) is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), in the matter following subparagraph (E), by striking (i) and all that follows through , (ii) in and inserting (i) for each month beginning with the first month after the individual’s waiting period (as defined in subsection (c)(2)) in which the individual becomes so entitled to such insurance benefits unless the individual elects to receive insurance benefits during such waiting period in accordance with paragraph (3), (ii) in the case of an individual electing to receive insurance benefits during the individual’s waiting period pursuant to the preceding clause and in;(2)in paragraph (2), by striking and section 215(b)(2)(A)(ii) and inserting , section 215(b)(2)(A)(ii), and paragraph (3) of this subsection,; and(3)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(3)(A)An individual who has not attained early retirement age (as defined in section 216(l)(2)) may elect to receive disability insurance benefits during the individual’s waiting period pursuant to paragraph (1) if such individual or their appointed representative makes such election in writing (which may include selecting an option on a benefit application form) during—(i)in the case of an individual who has applied for but not yet received a decision on their application for such disability insurance benefits before the date on which this paragraph takes effect—(I)the 45-day period following such date, or(II)the 10-day period (if such period ends later than the end of the 45-day period) following the date on which such individual receives a decision on such application which is favorable to such individual, (ii)in the case of an individual applying for disability insurance benefits on or after the date on which this paragraph takes effect—(I)the date on which such individual files an application for disability insurance benefit, or during the 10-day period following such date,(II)the date on which such individual requests reconsideration of the initial determination, or during the 10-day period following such date, or(III)the date on which such individual requests a hearing by an administrative law judge, or during the 10-day period following such date, (iii)in the case of an individual whose interest the Commissioner of Social Security determines would be served by making payment of the individual’s benefit to a representative payee (within the meaning of section 205(j)), such individual’s election may be revoked or confirmed by such representative payee during the 10-day period beginning on the date on which such representative payee is selected, and(iv)in the case of an individual who elects to receive disability insurance benefits during such individual’s waiting period pursuant to paragraph (1), the individual may revoke such election during the periods described in this subparagraph, except that in no event shall such elections or revocations occur in the first month of an established period of eligibility.(B)In the case of an individual electing to receive a disability insurance benefit during the individual’s waiting period pursuant to paragraph (1), such individual's disability insurance benefit for any month during or after such waiting period shall—(i)be equal to the product of—(I)the disability insurance benefit amount determined under paragraph (2) (as determined before application of this paragraph), multiplied by(II)the percentage determined under subparagraph (C) for the month during which such individual first becomes entitled to such disability insurance benefit,(ii)continue unchanged for the entire period of eligibility for such disability insurance benefit, and without the effect of recalculations described under subparagraph (C), and(iii)if applicable, be paid as part of a claim of entitlement to past-due benefits under this title and included in the total dollar amount of such past-due benefits.(C)The percentage determined under this subparagraph shall be—(i)for any month in the 36-month period beginning with the first month that begins after the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this paragraph, 94.25 percent, and(ii)for any subsequent month, the percentage most recently certified by the Commissioner under paragraph (D)(ii).(D)(i)Not later than the end of the 36-month period described under subparagraph (C)(i), and not later than the end of every 5-year period thereafter, the Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration shall calculate a percentage such that the fiscal impact over a 75-year period upon the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund if all individuals who applied pursuant to paragraph (1) to receive disability insurance benefits made an election to receive benefits during their waiting periods is equal to the fiscal impact over such period upon such Trust Fund that would have been made if all individuals who applied had not made such election.(ii)Not later than the end of the 36-month period described under subparagraph (C)(i), and not later than the end of every 5-year period thereafter, the Commissioner—(I)if the percentage calculated by the Chief Actuary in accordance with clause (i) is greater than or equal to 91 percent, shall certify to the Managing Trustee such percentage, or(II)if such percentage is less than 91 percent, may elect not to certify such percentage to the Managing Trustee.(iii)Not later than 2 years after the Commissioner elects not to certify any percentage calculated by the Chief Actuary, the Chief Actuary shall prepare and deliver a report to Congress, including detailed recommendations for administrative or legislative actions to permit individuals eligible for disability insurance benefits to receive disability insurance benefits during the disability insurance benefit waiting period such that the fiscal impact over a 75-year period upon the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund is actuarially neutral.(E)No election made or not made by an individual pursuant to this paragraph shall be construed to have any effect on any benefits payable to any other individual on the basis of such individual’s wages and self-employment income.(F)The Commissioner shall make available to the general public by posting on a website information relating to electing to receive disability insurance benefits during the waiting period, including a calculator which an individual may use to determine the effect of electing to receive disability insurance benefits during the waiting period on the individual’s disability insurance benefit.(G)Each application for entitlement to disability insurance benefits that may subject the individual to the waiting period pursuant to paragraph (1) shall allow for new elections or revocations under this paragraph. .(b)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply to applications for disability insurance benefits that are made or pending on or after the first day of the first month that begins after the date which is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.(c)Update to Social Security disability formsNot later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall update the application forms for applying for disability insurance benefits to include an option for applicants to elect to receive disability insurance benefits during their waiting period.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Maine officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Maine statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.