Kansas · individual fact

Kansas housing and borrowing

Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.

Median owner-occupied home value$217.2K2020–2024 · #41 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$1.06K2020–2024 · #38 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate67.2%2020–2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first

Kansas over time

Explore Kansas readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Kansas officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Kansas effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Kansas change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Home-price growth since 2016 Kansas · source units
KansasPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Home-price growth since 20162025: +82.5%-9.9%+41.3%+92.4%Kansas, 2016: +0%Kansas, 2017: +3.2%Kansas, 2018: +6.8%Kansas, 2019: +11.1%Kansas, 2020: +16.6%Kansas, 2021: +29.8%Kansas, 2022: +47.2%Kansas, 2023: +56.5%Kansas, 2024: +67%Kansas, 2025: +82.5%201620202025
✦ Major events & context · 29Kansas · An EF5 tornado devastates Greensburg, Kansas · 2007-05-04Greensburg tornadoNational context · Housing downturn and the Great Recession · 2007-12-01Great RecessionNational context · Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conservatorships announced · 2008-09-07Mortgage conservatorshipNational context · Federal Reserve announces agency mortgage-bond purchases · 2008-11-25Mortgage-bond purchasesNational context · Making Home Affordable modification guidelines released · 2009-03-04Mortgage relief guidelinesNational context · Federal Reserve announces another round of mortgage-bond purchases · 2012-09-13Further mortgage supportNational context · Federal Reserve announces slower bond purchases · 2013-12-18Bond purchases slowNational context · Ability-to-Repay mortgage standards take effect · 2014-01-10Mortgage lending standardsNational context · Federal Reserve raises its target above the near-zero range · 2015-12-16Rates leave near zeroNational context · Pandemic shock and emergency mortgage-market support · 2020-03-15COVID-19 / Fed responseNational context · CARES Act introduces mortgage and renter protections · 2020-03-27CARES housing reliefKansas · Commission on Racial Equity and Justice · 2020-06-24Commission on Racial Equity and JusticeNational context · CDC eviction moratorium takes effect · 2020-09-04CDC eviction protectionsNational context · Treasury launches Emergency Rental Assistance · 2021-01-05Rental assistance launchesNational context · American Rescue Plan funds additional housing assistance · 2021-03-11Additional housing reliefNational context · Supreme Court blocks the renewed CDC eviction moratorium · 2021-08-26CDC moratorium blockedNational context · Federal Reserve begins the 2022 rate-increase cycle · 2022-03-16Rate increases beginNational context · Federal Reserve begins reducing its securities holdings · 2022-06-01Fed holdings begin shrinkingNational context · Freddie Mac changes mortgage-rate measurement · 2022-11-17Mortgage survey updateNational context · Average 30-year mortgage rate reaches 7.79% · 2023-10-26Mortgage rates reach 7.79%National context · Federal Reserve lowers its policy-rate target · 2024-09-18Policy-rate cutNational context · Federal Reserve ends the reduction of total securities holdings · 2025-12-01Fed runoff endsNational context · Federal Reserve cuts its target to 3.50–3.75% · 2025-12-10Further policy-rate cutNational context · Executive order targets federal support for institutional home purchases · 2026-01-20Institutional-buyer orderNational context · Executive order directs review of home-construction barriers · 2026-03-13Home-construction reviewNational context · Executive order directs review of mortgage-credit rules · 2026-03-13Mortgage-credit reviewKansas · Uniform Fire Code Task Force · 2026-06-29Uniform Fire Code Task ForceNational context · 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act becomes law · 2026-07-11ROAD housing lawNational context · Federal Reserve holds its target at 3.50–3.75% · 2026-07-29Policy rate held steady● Kansas Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · 2◆ Governor · 3■ Kansas agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2007-05-012026-07-31

6 of 6 reviewed Kansas actions match · 6 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.

Kansas · 2025: +82.5% · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Kansas Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
PeriodKansasRankU.S. benchmark
2025+82.5%#29 of 50Not available
2024+67%#38 of 50Not available
2023+56.5%#39 of 50Not available
2022+47.2%#39 of 50Not available
2021+29.8%#34 of 50Not available
2020+16.6%#32 of 50Not available
2019+11.1%#33 of 50Not available
2018+6.8%#32 of 50Not available
2017+3.2%#34 of 50Not available
2016+0%#1 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Kansas · state comparison

Home values, rent, and homeownership

Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.

Kansas · 2020–2024$217,200
Kansas rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median owner-occupied home value

Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.

2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · $217,2002020–2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii$839,100—
#2California$734,700—
#3Washington$564,600—
#4Massachusetts$562,100—
#5Colorado$539,400—
#6Utah$489,400—
#7Oregon$477,600—
#8New Jersey$454,400—
#9Nevada$435,400—
#10New York$423,800—
#11Maryland$419,900—
#12Idaho$418,600—
#13Rhode Island$404,200—
#14New Hampshire$402,500—
#15Arizona$394,500—
#16Virginia$383,700—
#17Montana$375,800—
#18Connecticut$366,900—
#19Florida$359,000—
#20Alaska$352,900—
#21Delaware$352,000—
#22Minnesota$329,300—
#23Vermont$316,600—
#24Wyoming$309,700—
#25Georgia$303,300—
#26Maine$296,600—
#27North Carolina$288,900—
#28Tennessee$286,700—
#29Texas$283,800—
#30Wisconsin$266,500—
#31Illinois$263,300—
#32South Carolina$259,000—
#33South Dakota$257,400—
#34Pennsylvania$254,500—
#35North Dakota$249,900—
#36New Mexico$248,100—
#37Nebraska$238,600—
#38Michigan$231,600—
#39Missouri$230,300—
#40Indiana$218,200—
#41Kansas · your comparison$217,200—
#42Louisiana$216,500—
#43Ohio$214,800—
#44Alabama$209,900—
#45Iowa$208,000—
#46Kentucky$205,600—
#47Oklahoma$199,800—
#48Arkansas$188,000—
#49Mississippi$169,800—
#50West Virginia$162,600—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median gross rent

$1,060/month2020–2024 estimate

Median monthly gross rent for occupied rental units paying cash rent, including contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Other statewide housing measures

Median owner-occupied home value
$217,200
Owner costs with a mortgage
$1,689/month
Owner-occupied housing rate
67.2%
Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.

  • This is a statewide multi-year estimate; local rents and current asking rents can differ substantially.
  • The owner measures describe owner-occupied units and are not estimates of the current cost to purchase a home.
Kansas · state comparison

How much income goes toward housing?

Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.

Kansas · 2020–202443.5%
Kansas rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Renters · spending at least 30% of income

Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.

Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 43.5%2020–2024 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Florida60.1%—
#2Hawaii56.7%—
#3Nevada55.9%—
#4California55.3%—
#5Louisiana54.8%—
#6Colorado52.9%—
#7Connecticut52.6%—
#8Oregon52.5%—
#9Georgia52.4%—
#10South Carolina52.1%—
#11New York52.1%—
#12Massachusetts51.8%—
#13Texas51.7%—
#14New Jersey51.6%—
#15Maryland51.5%—
#16Arizona51.4%—
#17Mississippi51.3%—
#18Michigan50.4%—
#19New Mexico50.2%—
#20Washington49.9%—
#21Delaware49.6%—
#22North Carolina48.9%—
#23West Virginia48.9%—
#24Tennessee48.8%—
#25Alabama48.8%—
#26Virginia48.5%—
#27Maine48.4%—
#28Vermont48.4%—
#29New Hampshire48.2%—
#30Pennsylvania48.2%—
#31Minnesota48.1%—
#32Indiana48.1%—
#33Rhode Island48%—
#34Illinois47.9%—
#35Utah47.2%—
#36Idaho46.9%—
#37Oklahoma46.3%—
#38Ohio45.9%—
#39Missouri45.6%—
#40Kentucky45.4%—
#41Nebraska45.1%—
#42Arkansas44.8%—
#43Montana44.8%—
#44Alaska44.6%—
#45Iowa43.9%—
#46Wisconsin43.7%—
#47Kansas · your comparison43.5%—
#48Wyoming43.1%—
#49South Dakota39.8%—
#50North Dakota38.9%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kansas · state comparison

Home prices versus income growth

Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.

Kansas · 2025+82.5%
Kansas rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Home-price growth since 2016

FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.

This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Kansas
Home-price growth since 2016 history in Kansas-12.4%+41.3%+94.9%20162025
2025 · Kansas: +82.5% · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Kansas Home-price growth since 2016 history
PeriodKansasCompare
2016+0%
2017+3.2%
2018+6.8%
2019+11.1%
2020+16.6%
2021+29.8%
2022+47.2%
2023+56.5%
2024+67%
2025+82.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · +82.5%2025 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Idaho+141.7%—
#2Florida+114.5%—
#3Maine+113.7%—
#4Utah+113.6%—
#5Tennessee+112.4%—
#6Arizona+112.3%—
#7New Hampshire+110.1%—
#8Rhode Island+108%—
#9Georgia+107.6%—
#10North Carolina+107.1%—
#11Montana+106.7%—
#12Nevada+106.1%—
#13South Carolina+105.5%—
#14Washington+100.2%—
#15Indiana+94.5%—
#16Wisconsin+94%—
#17Michigan+93.7%—
#18Ohio+93.3%—
#19Vermont+92.6%—
#20New Jersey+88.9%—
#21Missouri+86.9%—
#22New York+85.9%—
#23Nebraska+84.6%—
#24Massachusetts+84.3%—
#24South Dakota+84.3%—
#26Texas+83.3%—
#27Kentucky+83.2%—
#28Colorado+83.1%—
#29Kansas · your comparison+82.5%—
#30New Mexico+82.3%—
#31Alabama+81.3%—
#32Arkansas+80.8%—
#33Connecticut+79.8%—
#34Pennsylvania+78.4%—
#35Virginia+76.5%—
#36Delaware+75.4%—
#37Oregon+74.7%—
#38California+72.7%—
#39Oklahoma+71.9%—
#40Minnesota+70%—
#41Wyoming+69.3%—
#42Illinois+65.3%—
#43Iowa+64.2%—
#44Mississippi+63.9%—
#45Hawaii+63%—
#46Maryland+59.4%—
#47West Virginia+58.6%—
#48Alaska+51.9%—
#49North Dakota+45.9%—
#50Louisiana+38.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Kansas · state comparison

Construction, availability, and borrowing

State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.

Kansas · 202510,299
Kansas rank#35among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total housing units authorized

New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.

A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Kansas stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Kansas has a dark outline.

Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Kansas · 10,2992025 · Rank #35 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Kansas with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas210,217—
#2Florida178,297—
#3California103,856—
#4North Carolina86,167—
#5Georgia61,196—
#6Arizona51,532—
#7South Carolina45,862—
#8Tennessee43,374—
#9New York38,667—
#10Washington34,913—
#11Colorado33,754—
#12Ohio33,640—
#13Virginia33,094—
#14Indiana29,076—
#15New Jersey27,661—
#16Utah26,775—
#17Pennsylvania25,709—
#18Wisconsin25,569—
#19Michigan23,075—
#20Minnesota20,947—
#21Alabama19,061—
#22Illinois18,551—
#23Nevada18,540—
#24Idaho17,944—
#25Missouri17,474—
#26Oklahoma15,513—
#27Arkansas15,492—
#28Kentucky14,940—
#29Oregon14,839—
#30Louisiana14,203—
#31Iowa13,664—
#32Maryland13,358—
#33Massachusetts12,477—
#34Nebraska10,596—
#35Kansas · your comparison10,299—
#36Mississippi8,405—
#37New Mexico7,747—
#38Connecticut7,273—
#39Maine6,979—
#40Delaware6,468—
#41South Dakota5,305—
#42Montana5,258—
#43New Hampshire5,030—
#44West Virginia3,962—
#45Hawaii3,708—
#46North Dakota2,440—
#47Vermont2,294—
#48Wyoming2,238—
#49Rhode Island1,738—
#50Alaska848—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Kansas candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

11 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Kansas Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Cindy Holscher

3 statements

Democratic · Governor · KS

Housing & homeownership

Cindy aims to lower residential property tax assessment rates from 11.5% to 9.0%, providing significant tax relief for homeowners across all income levels. She’ll add exemptions to our tax system, too, to make sure that the property tax burden doesn’t push seniors and disabled veterans out of their …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Cindy aims to lower residential property tax assessment rates from 11.5% to 9.0%, providing significant tax relief for homeowners across all income levels. She’ll add exemptions to our tax system, too, to make sure that the property tax burden doesn’t push seniors and disabled veterans out of their homes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Cindy Holscher
Housing & homeownership

Lower residential property assessment rates from 11.5% to 9.0%, lowering annual tax burdens and providing significant property tax relief for homeowners across all income levels. Establish a task force to determine other avenues for property tax relief.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Lower residential property assessment rates from 11.5% to 9.0%, lowering annual tax burdens and providing significant property tax relief for homeowners across all income levels. Establish a task force to determine other avenues for property tax relief.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Housing & homeownership

Every working family should be able to afford a place to raise their kids, but for too many, wages and salaries aren’t keeping up with the cost of housing. Cindy will fight to build more affordable housing in communities that need it. And she’ll fight for fairness for renters as well as homeowners, …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, spending, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Every working family should be able to afford a place to raise their kids, but for too many, wages and salaries aren’t keeping up with the cost of housing. Cindy will fight to build more affordable housing in communities that need it. And she’ll fight for fairness for renters as well as homeowners, so if they make a late payment, they’re not at risk of losing their homes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Cindy Holscher — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Ty Masterson

1 statement

Republican · Governor · KS

Housing & homeownership

Adopt a Homeowners Bill of Rights to protect homeowners from rapidly rising property taxes and give taxpayers a stronger voice.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Kansas Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Adopt a Homeowners Bill of Rights to protect homeowners from rapidly rising property taxes and give taxpayers a stronger voice.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Ty Masterson — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Kansas State Treasurer — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Juan C. Luengo

1 statement

Democratic · State Treasurer · KS

Borrowing costs

Use Treasurer linked-deposit programs through Kansas banks and credit unions to lower borrowing costs for small businesses, farmers, and construction.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Five Pillars

Candidate campaign source

Use Treasurer linked-deposit programs through Kansas banks and credit unions to lower borrowing costs for small businesses, farmers, and construction.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Juan C. Luengo — Part 66 verified source ↗

2026 Kansas U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Lauren Reinhold

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · KS

Housing & homeownership

Represented low-income Kansans in Legal Aid organizations fighting for their housing, consumer, and family rights in the legal system.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: ATTORNEY & ADVOCATE

Candidate campaign source

Represented low-income Kansans in Legal Aid organizations fighting for their housing, consumer, and family rights in the legal system.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Lauren Reinhold — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Kansas candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Kansas incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Kansas legislators and Kansas’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Kansas’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Kansas incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Sen. Dinah Sykes

Kansas Senate, District 21 · D–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Dinah Sykes
Kansas Legislature · SB 370

Modifying how a rental agreement terminates in the case of material noncompliance by the landlord with the rental agreement.

Apr 10, 2026 · Died in committee

Sen. Dinah Sykes · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 370 would allow a tenant’s termination notice for material landlord noncompliance to take effect on the specified notice date regardless of the periodic rent-paying date. It retains the 30-day notice framework and the stated opportunity to remedy an initial breach. This tenancy proposal died in committee and does not set rent levels. For a remediable initial breach, adequately initiating a good-faith remedy within 14 days prevents termination. A repeated similar breach permits a new 30-day notice without another opportunity to remedy; tenant-caused conditions are excluded.

Died in committee on 2026-04-10. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities. Tenancy rules and assisted rental housing concern rental-market conditions, but do not set the statewide median. Upfront deposits and late fees are not themselves components of measured gross rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. K.S.A. 58-2559 is hereby amended to read as follows: 58- 2559. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this act, if there is a material noncompliance by the landlord with the rental agreement or a noncompliance with K.S.A. 58-2553 , and amendments thereto, materially affecting health and safety, the tenant may deliver a written notice to the landlord specifying the acts and omissions constituting the breach and that the rental agreement will terminate upon […] date not less than […] (30) days after receipt of the notice. The rental agreement shall terminate as provided in the notice, regardless of the periodic rent- paying date, subject to the following: (1) If the breach is remediable by repairs or the payment of damages or otherwise, and the landlord adequately initiates a good faith effort to remedy the breach within […] (14) days after receipt of the notice, the rental agreement shall not terminate. However, in the event that the same or a similar breach occurs after the […] 14-day period provided […] in this paragraph , the tenant may deliver a written notice to the landlord specifically describing the breach and stating that the rental agreement shall terminate upon […] date not less than […] (30) days after the receipt of such notice by the landlord without providing the opportunity to remedy the breach. The rental agreement then shall terminate as provided in such notice regardless of the periodic rent- paying date. (2) The tenant may not terminate for a condition caused by an act or omission of, or […] that is or can be properly attributable or applicable to, the tenant or any person or animal or pet on the premises at any time with the tenant's express or implied permission or consent. (b) Except as otherwise provided in this act, the tenant may recover damages and obtain injunctive relief for any noncompliance by the landlord with the rental agreement or K.S.A. 58-2553 , and amendments 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 SB 370 2 thereto. The remedy provided in this subsection shall be in addition to any right of the tenant arising under subsection (a) […] . (c) If the rental agreement is terminated, the landlord shall return that portion of the security deposit recoverable by the tenant under K.S.A. 58- 2550, and amendments thereto. (d) The provisions of this section shall not limit a landlord's or tenant's right to terminate the rental agreement pursuant to K.S.A. 58- 2570, and amendments thereto.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Jerry Moran

U.S. Senate, Kansas · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Jerry Moran
U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · S 2423

Streamlining Rural Housing Act of 2025

Jul 23, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Jerry Moran · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 2423 would require HUD and USDA to coordinate environmental reviews for jointly funded housing, evaluate joint physical inspections and consult an advisory group including residents and housing providers. Its report requirements prohibit recommendations that materially reduce resident safety, shift long-term costs to residents or undermine environmental standards. This proposal does not establish completed projects or lower rents.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities. Tenancy rules and assisted rental housing concern rental-market conditions, but do not set the statewide median. Upfront deposits and late fees are not themselves components of measured gross rent. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2. Memorandum of understanding (a) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Secretary of Agriculture shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to— (1) evaluate categorical exclusions (as defined in section 111 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4336e)) for housing projects funded by amounts from the Department of the Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Agriculture; (2) develop a process to designate a lead agency among the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Agriculture and streamline the adoption of environmental impact statements and environmental assessments approved by the other agency to construct housing projects funded by amounts from both agencies; (3) maintain compliance with environmental regulations under part 58 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 2025; and (4) evaluate the feasibility of a joint physical inspection process for housing projects funded by amounts from the Department of the Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Agriculture. (b) Advisory working group (1) In general Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Secretary of Agriculture shall establish an advisory working group for the purpose of consulting on the implementation of the memorandum of understanding entered into under subsection (a). (2) Members The advisory working group established under paragraph (1) shall consist of rural and non-rural stakeholders, including— (A) affordable housing nonprofit organizations; (B) State housing and housing finance agencies; (C) nonprofit and for-profit home builders and housing developers; (D) property management companies; (E) owners of multifamily properties, including nonprofit and for-profit owners and operators; (F) public housing agencies; (G) residents in housing assisted by the Department of Housing and Urban Development or the Department of Agriculture and representatives of those residents; and (H) housing contract administrators. (c) Report Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report that includes recommendations for legislative, regulatory, or administrative actions— (1) to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of housing projects funded by amounts from the Department of the Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Agriculture; and (2) that do not materially, with respect to residents of housing projects described in paragraph (1)— (A) reduce the safety of those residents; (B) shift long-term costs onto those residents; or (C) undermine the environmental standards of those residents.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Roger Marshall

U.S. Senate, Kansas · R–KS

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Roger Marshall
U.S. Congress · Kansas delegation · S 3602

Public Charge Clarification Act of 2026

Jan 8, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Roger Marshall · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 3 of S 3602 would expand public-charge definitions and benefit categories, specify a totality-of-circumstances assessment, and add support-documentation and bond requirements. It includes exemptions for refugees, asylees and specified military families. This pending proposal is not a finding about any Kansas resident’s immigration status or benefits. The proposed threshold is receipt of benefits for more than 12 months in a 36-month period; receiving two benefits in one month counts as two benefit-months for the public-charge definition. Its Medicaid category excludes emergency assistance and benefits for people under 21 or pregnant women. A required bond would be at least $10,000 where other factors warrant conditional admission or adjustment.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. Immigration-status rules address only subsets of this population and do not change birthplace. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Kansas evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.Definition of public chargeSection 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(4)) is amended to read as follows:(4)Public charge(A)In generalAny alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible.(B)DefinitionsIn this paragraph:(i)Likely at any time to become a public chargeThe term likely at any time to become a public charge, with respect to an alien, means the alien is likely to receive 1 or more public benefits for more than 12 months, in the aggregate, during any 36-month period after the date on which—(I)the alien is admitted to the United States; or(II)the alien's status is adjusted under this title. (ii) Public benefits The term public benefits means any Federal, State, local, or tribal cash assistance for income maintenance, supplemental nutrition assistance, housing assistance, non-emergency medical assistance, or other similar benefits, including all monetizable and non-monetizable benefits (as defined in the proposed rule entitled Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds, (83 Fed. Reg. 51114)), including benefits received from— (I) supplemental security income authorized under title XVI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.); (II) temporary assistance for needy families authorized under part A of title IV of such Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); (III) any Federal, State, local, or tribal cash benefit program for income maintenance; (IV) the supplemental nutrition assistance program authorized under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.); (V) the housing choice voucher program and project-based rental assistance (including moderate rehabilitation) authorized under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f); (VI) public housing funds authorized under section 9 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1437g); (VII) the Medicaid program authorized under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.), excluding emergency medical assistance, benefits provided to individuals who are younger than 21 years of age, and benefits provided to pregnant women; (VIII) premium and cost-sharing subsidies authorized under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to refundable credit for coverage under a qualified health plan) or section 1402 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (14 U.S.C. 18071; relating to reduced cost sharing); and (IX) any other Federal, State, local, or tribal program providing monetizable or non-monetizable benefits, including programs established after the date of the enactment of the Public Charge Clarification Act of 2026. (iii)Public chargeThe term public charge means an alien who receives 1 or more public benefits for more than 12 months, in the aggregate, within any 36-month period. The receipt of 2 benefits in a single month shall be deemed to constitute 2 months of benefits for purposes of this clause.(C)Publication of list of benefits(i)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Public Charge Clarification Act of 2026, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, shall publish in the Federal Register a comprehensive list of all public benefits that may render an alien a public charge or likely to become a public charge.(ii)UpdatesThe Secretary shall—(I)update the list described in clause (i) whenever necessary to include any new programs or benefits created after the publication of such list; and(II)publish notice of such updates in the Federal Register.(D)Factors to be considered(i)In generalIn determining whether an alien is inadmissible under this paragraph, the consular officer or the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services shall consider, in the totality of the circumstances, the alien’s—(I)age;(II)health;(III)family status;(IV)assets, resources, and financial status;(V)education and skills;(VI)prospective immigration status and expected period of admission; and(VII)any affidavit of support executed by a sponsor in accordance with section 213A(a)(1).(ii)DeterminationNo single factor listed under clause (i) shall be dispositive. The determination of inadmissibility shall be based on a holistic assessment of the alien’s likelihood of becoming a public charge.(E)ExemptionsThis paragraph shall not apply to—(i)refugees admitted under section 207;(ii)asylees granted asylum under section 208; or(iii)aliens serving in the Armed Forces of the United States and the dependents of such aliens.(F)WaiversNo waiver of inadmissibility under this paragraph shall be granted to any alien, other than the aliens exempted under subparagraph (F), unless such waiver is specifically authorized by an Act of Congress.(G)Affidavits of supportAn affidavit of support submitted by the sponsor of an alien in accordance with section 213A—(i)shall be accompanied by documentary evidence demonstrating the sponsor’s ability to financially support the alien and all members of the sponsor’s household, including proof of income, assets, and resources sufficient to maintain the household at an annual income equal to at least 125 percent of the Federal poverty line; and(ii)may be considered as a factor in the totality of the circumstances under subparagraph (D), but shall not be sufficient to overcome a finding that an alien is likely to become a public charge.(H)Public charge bonds(i)RequirementThe consular officer or the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services shall require the posting of a public charge bond as a condition of an alien's admission or adjustment of status if the alien is likely at any time to become a public charge, but other factors warrant conditional approval.(ii)Amount; forfeitureEach public charge bond required under clause (i) shall be—(I)in an amount equal to not less than $10,000;(II)payable to the United States; and (III) forfeited if the alien for whom it is posted becomes a public charge during the 10-year period immediately following the alien's admission to the United States or adjustment of status. (iii)RulemakingThe Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, shall promulgate regulations for the administration, forfeiture, and cancellation of public charge bonds required under this subparagraph..
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Kansas officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Kansas statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.