Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.
Uninsured rate · all ages6.5%2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 657.8%2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6573.9%2024 · #17 of 50 · highest first
Washington over time
Explore Washington readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Washington officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Washington effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Washington change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Uninsured rate · all ages Washington · source units
WashingtonPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
204 of 204 reviewed Washington actions match · 79 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.
Washington · 2024: 6.5% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Washington Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Washington · state comparison
Who has health coverage?
Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.
Washington · 20246.5%
Washington rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Uninsured rate · all ages
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.
ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Washington
2024 · Washington: 6.5% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Washington Uninsured rate · all ages history
Period
Washington
Compare
2014
9.2%
2015
6.6%
2016
6%
2017
6.1%
2018
6.4%
2019
6.6%
2020
Not available
2021
6.4%
2022
6.1%
2023
6.3%
2024
6.5%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Washington · 6.5%2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
16.7%
—
#2
Georgia
12%
—
#3
Oklahoma
11.5%
—
#4
Nevada
11.4%
—
#5
Alaska
11%
—
#6
Florida
10.9%
—
#7
Arizona
10.3%
—
#7
Wyoming
10.3%
—
#9
New Mexico
10.1%
—
#10
Mississippi
9.7%
—
#10
Tennessee
9.7%
—
#12
Arkansas
9.4%
—
#13
Idaho
9.2%
—
#14
South Carolina
9%
—
#15
Montana
8.8%
—
#16
North Carolina
8.6%
—
#17
Kansas
8.5%
—
#18
Utah
8.3%
—
#19
Alabama
8.2%
—
#20
South Dakota
8.1%
—
#21
Colorado
7.9%
—
#22
Louisiana
7.7%
—
#22
Missouri
7.7%
—
#22
New Jersey
7.7%
—
#25
Indiana
7.5%
—
#26
Nebraska
7.1%
—
#27
Delaware
6.9%
—
#27
Illinois
6.9%
—
#27
Virginia
6.9%
—
#30
Kentucky
6.8%
—
#31
Ohio
6.7%
—
#32
Washington · your comparison
6.5%
—
#33
Maryland
6.3%
—
#34
North Dakota
6.1%
—
#35
California
5.9%
—
#36
Connecticut
5.8%
—
#36
Pennsylvania
5.8%
—
#36
West Virginia
5.8%
—
#39
Maine
5.5%
—
#40
Iowa
5.4%
—
#41
Wisconsin
5.3%
—
#42
Oregon
5.2%
—
#43
Michigan
5.1%
—
#43
Minnesota
5.1%
—
#45
New York
5%
—
#46
Rhode Island
4.6%
—
#47
New Hampshire
4.5%
—
#48
Vermont
4.2%
—
#49
Hawaii
3.5%
—
#50
Massachusetts
2.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Washington’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.
This is a survey estimate and is not the same as current Medicaid enrollment or an administrative coverage count.
Coverage status alone does not measure affordability, provider access, quality, or prescription-drug costs.
State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Washington with every state.
Washington · 2020$9,265
Washington rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal healthcare spending per resident
Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.
2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Washington
2020 · Washington: $9,265 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Washington Personal healthcare spending per resident history
Period
Washington
Compare
2014
$7,602
2015
$7,904
2016
$8,097
2017
$8,278
2018
$8,588
2019
$8,964
2020
$9,265
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.
Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Washington · $9,2652020 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$14,007
—
#2
Alaska
$13,642
—
#3
Massachusetts
$13,319
—
#4
Delaware
$12,899
—
#5
West Virginia
$12,769
—
#6
Vermont
$12,756
—
#7
South Dakota
$12,495
—
#8
Connecticut
$12,489
—
#9
Maine
$12,077
—
#10
New Jersey
$11,868
—
#11
New Hampshire
$11,793
—
#12
Rhode Island
$11,694
—
#13
Pennsylvania
$11,603
—
#14
North Dakota
$11,301
—
#15
Wyoming
$10,989
—
#16
Minnesota
$10,846
—
#17
Maryland
$10,839
—
#18
Indiana
$10,517
—
#19
Louisiana
$10,515
—
#20
Nebraska
$10,514
—
#21
Ohio
$10,478
—
#22
California
$10,299
—
#23
Hawaii
$10,291
—
#24
Kentucky
$10,257
—
#25
Montana
$10,212
—
#26
Illinois
$10,190
—
#27
Oregon
$10,071
—
#28
Wisconsin
$9,982
—
#29
Missouri
$9,921
—
#30
Michigan
$9,897
—
#31
Florida
$9,865
—
#32
Iowa
$9,789
—
#33
Oklahoma
$9,444
—
#34
Kansas
$9,408
—
#35
Mississippi
$9,394
—
#36
Arkansas
$9,338
—
#37
Tennessee
$9,336
—
#38
Alabama
$9,280
—
#39
Washington · your comparison
$9,265
—
#40
Virginia
$9,195
—
#41
North Carolina
$8,917
—
#42
New Mexico
$8,902
—
#43
South Carolina
$8,766
—
#44
Georgia
$8,758
—
#45
Arizona
$8,756
—
#46
Colorado
$8,583
—
#47
Texas
$8,406
—
#48
Nevada
$8,348
—
#49
Idaho
$8,148
—
#50
Utah
$7,522
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.
Washington · 202278.4 years
Washington rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Life expectancy at birth
FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Washington population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.
The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Washington
2022 · Washington: 78.4 years · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Washington Life expectancy at birth history
Period
Washington
Compare
2018
80 years
2019
80 years
2020
79.2 years
2021
78.2 years
2022
78.4 years
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.
Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Washington · 78.4 years2022 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
80 years
—
#2
Massachusetts
79.8 years
—
#3
New Jersey
79.6 years
—
#4
New York
79.5 years
—
#5
Connecticut
79.4 years
—
#6
California
79.3 years
—
#6
Minnesota
79.3 years
—
#8
Rhode Island
79.2 years
—
#9
Utah
79 years
—
#10
New Hampshire
78.7 years
—
#11
Colorado
78.5 years
—
#12
Idaho
78.4 years
—
#12
Washington · your comparison
78.4 years
—
#14
Nebraska
78.3 years
—
#14
Vermont
78.3 years
—
#16
Wisconsin
78.1 years
—
#17
Florida
77.9 years
—
#17
Iowa
77.9 years
—
#17
North Dakota
77.9 years
—
#20
Maryland
77.8 years
—
#21
Oregon
77.7 years
—
#22
Illinois
77.5 years
—
#22
Virginia
77.5 years
—
#24
Montana
77.3 years
—
#24
Pennsylvania
77.3 years
—
#24
South Dakota
77.3 years
—
#27
Texas
77.1 years
—
#28
Michigan
76.8 years
—
#28
Wyoming
76.8 years
—
#30
Arizona
76.7 years
—
#31
Maine
76.6 years
—
#32
Delaware
76.5 years
—
#32
Kansas
76.5 years
—
#34
Nevada
76.4 years
—
#35
Georgia
75.9 years
—
#35
North Carolina
75.9 years
—
#37
Alaska
75.8 years
—
#38
Ohio
75.6 years
—
#39
Indiana
75.4 years
—
#40
Missouri
75.2 years
—
#41
South Carolina
75.1 years
—
#42
New Mexico
74.5 years
—
#43
Arkansas
73.9 years
—
#44
Alabama
73.8 years
—
#44
Louisiana
73.8 years
—
#44
Oklahoma
73.8 years
—
#44
Tennessee
73.8 years
—
#48
Kentucky
73.6 years
—
#49
Mississippi
72.6 years
—
#50
West Virginia
72.2 years
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.
Washington · 20238.6%
Washington rank#40among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted
Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.
Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Washington
2023 · Washington: 8.6% · Rank #40 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Washington Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
Period
Washington
Compare
2019
8.6%
2020
7.9%
2021
7.9%
2022
8.8%
2023
8.6%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.
Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Washington · 8.6%2023 · Rank #40 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 8.2% – 9%Selected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Washington with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Mississippi
15.1%
95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1
West Virginia
15.1%
95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3
Louisiana
14.6%
95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4
Alabama
14%
95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5
Arkansas
13.1%
95% CI: 12–14.3
#6
South Carolina
12.7%
95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6
Tennessee
12.7%
95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8
Texas
12.1%
95% CI: 11–13.3
#9
Indiana
11.7%
95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10
Georgia
11.5%
95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10
Ohio
11.5%
95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12
Oklahoma
11.3%
95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13
Delaware
11.1%
95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14
North Carolina
11%
95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15
Illinois
10.9%
95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15
Maryland
10.9%
95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15
Michigan
10.9%
95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18
Nevada
10.8%
95% CI: 8.9–13
#18
New Mexico
10.8%
95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20
Missouri
10.7%
95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20
South Dakota
10.7%
95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22
California
10.6%
95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23
Kansas
10.5%
95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24
Virginia
10.4%
95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25
Florida
10.1%
95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26
Rhode Island
10%
95% CI: 9.1–11
#27
Arizona
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27
Iowa
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29
Nebraska
9.7%
95% CI: 9–10.3
#30
Wisconsin
9.6%
95% CI: 9–10.2
#31
Hawaii
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31
New York
9.5%
95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31
Oregon
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34
Wyoming
9.4%
95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35
Minnesota
9.3%
95% CI: 8.6–10
#36
New Jersey
9.1%
95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37
Maine
9%
95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38
North Dakota
8.9%
95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39
Idaho
8.7%
95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40
Washington · your comparison
8.6%
95% CI: 8.2–9
#41
Massachusetts
8.5%
95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42
Connecticut
8.4%
95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43
Alaska
8.2%
95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44
Utah
8.1%
95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45
Colorado
8%
95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46
Montana
7.9%
95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46
New Hampshire
7.9%
95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48
Vermont
7.8%
95% CI: 7–8.7
—
Kentucky
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Pennsylvania
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.
Washington · June 30, 202642.4%
Washington rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Primary care · need met
HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.
National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Washington · 42.4%June 30, 2026 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Jersey
83.2%
—
#2
Vermont
82.6%
—
#3
South Carolina
79.4%
—
#4
New Hampshire
74.8%
—
#5
Rhode Island
74.3%
—
#6
Louisiana
72.1%
—
#7
Hawaii
67.1%
—
#8
Utah
65.4%
—
#9
Wisconsin
65.2%
—
#10
Alabama
63%
—
#11
Connecticut
60.3%
—
#12
Massachusetts
58%
—
#13
Tennessee
58%
—
#14
Virginia
57.2%
—
#15
Pennsylvania
56.7%
—
#16
Maine
56%
—
#17
Minnesota
55.4%
—
#18
Wyoming
54.4%
—
#19
Indiana
54.2%
—
#20
California
53.2%
—
#21
Arkansas
52.6%
—
#22
Texas
49.8%
—
#23
Ohio
49.7%
—
#24
Nebraska
49.1%
—
#25
Alaska
48.9%
—
#26
North Carolina
48.1%
—
#27
Colorado
47.5%
—
#28
Michigan
44.9%
—
#29
Oregon
43.9%
—
#30
Idaho
43.9%
—
#31
Washington · your comparison
42.4%
—
#32
Illinois
41.5%
—
#33
Nevada
41.5%
—
#34
Arizona
41.2%
—
#35
Kansas
41.1%
—
#36
Iowa
40.5%
—
#37
Florida
39.7%
—
#38
Georgia
39.1%
—
#39
Montana
38.5%
—
#40
West Virginia
38.3%
—
#41
North Dakota
36.5%
—
#42
New York
35.3%
—
#43
South Dakota
34.6%
—
#44
Mississippi
34.1%
—
#45
Maryland
31.6%
—
#46
New Mexico
31.4%
—
#47
Kentucky
30.8%
—
#48
Oklahoma
28.6%
—
#49
Missouri
23.7%
—
#50
Delaware
11.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.
Washington · 2020$7,440
Washington rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Single coverage premium · all firms
Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.
Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.
Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Washington · $7,4402020 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alaska
$8,635
—
#2
New York
$8,177
—
#3
New Hampshire
$7,991
—
#4
Vermont
$7,868
—
#5
Wyoming
$7,743
—
#6
Nebraska
$7,611
—
#7
South Carolina
$7,516
—
#8
Connecticut
$7,501
—
#9
Maine
$7,496
—
#10
Massachusetts
$7,452
—
#11
Washington · your comparison
$7,440
—
#12
New Mexico
$7,424
—
#13
Illinois
$7,376
—
#14
New Jersey
$7,373
—
#15
Maryland
$7,352
—
#16
Rhode Island
$7,326
—
#17
Indiana
$7,319
—
#18
Delaware
$7,280
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7,250
—
#20
Pennsylvania
$7,246
—
#21
North Dakota
$7,216
—
#22
Colorado
$7,206
—
#23
Missouri
$7,179
—
#24
California
$7,173
—
#25
Florida
$7,078
—
#26
South Dakota
$7,070
—
#27
Oklahoma
$7,058
—
#28
Hawaii
$7,040
—
#29
North Carolina
$7,036
—
#30
Texas
$7,017
—
#31
West Virginia
$6,993
—
#32
Ohio
$6,989
—
#33
Kentucky
$6,949
—
#34
Iowa
$6,932
—
#35
Virginia
$6,928
—
#36
Oregon
$6,917
—
#37
Minnesota
$6,910
—
#38
Georgia
$6,876
—
#39
Montana
$6,860
—
#40
Idaho
$6,744
—
#41
Louisiana
$6,713
—
#42
Michigan
$6,683
—
#43
Kansas
$6,675
—
#44
Arizona
$6,612
—
#45
Utah
$6,593
—
#46
Mississippi
$6,561
—
#47
Nevada
$6,493
—
#48
Tennessee
$6,485
—
#49
Arkansas
$6,414
—
#50
Alabama
$6,393
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.
Washington · 2023–202427.9%
Washington rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+
Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.
Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.
Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Washington · 27.9%2023–2024 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Oregon
31.6%
—
#2
Vermont
29.1%
—
#3
West Virginia
28.1%
—
#4
Washington · your comparison
27.9%
—
#5
New Hampshire
27.7%
—
#6
Tennessee
27%
—
#7
Utah
26.7%
—
#8
Maine
26.7%
—
#9
Arkansas
26.6%
—
#10
Colorado
26.4%
—
#11
Rhode Island
25.8%
—
#12
Missouri
25.7%
—
#13
Montana
25.6%
—
#14
Indiana
25.3%
—
#15
Kentucky
25.3%
—
#16
Georgia
25.2%
—
#17
Iowa
25%
—
#18
Massachusetts
24.9%
—
#19
Wyoming
24.7%
—
#20
Nevada
24.6%
—
#21
Arizona
24.6%
—
#22
Wisconsin
24.6%
—
#23
Idaho
24.5%
—
#24
Nebraska
24.1%
—
#25
Louisiana
24.1%
—
#26
Alaska
24%
—
#27
Pennsylvania
23.9%
—
#28
New Mexico
23.9%
—
#28
Ohio
23.9%
—
#30
Connecticut
23.7%
—
#31
Kansas
23.7%
—
#32
Michigan
23.6%
—
#33
Virginia
23.1%
—
#34
Alabama
23%
—
#35
North Dakota
23%
—
#36
Maryland
22.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
22.6%
—
#38
Minnesota
22.6%
—
#39
Illinois
22.2%
—
#40
Delaware
22.1%
—
#41
New York
21.9%
—
#42
South Dakota
21.8%
—
#43
California
21.6%
—
#44
North Carolina
21.4%
—
#45
Florida
20.8%
—
#46
Texas
20.7%
—
#47
Mississippi
20.5%
—
#48
Hawaii
19.8%
—
#49
South Carolina
19.8%
—
#50
New Jersey
18.1%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
204 of 204 reviewed Washington actions · newest first
Jun 29, 2026 · Legal action · AG Brown sues over unlawful federal implementation of Medicaid work requirements · Official action recordedWashington agencies · Legal action
AG Brown sues over unlawful federal implementation of Medicaid work requirements
Jun 29, 2026 · Official action recorded
Attorney General Nick Brown · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
The federal administration’s unlawful implementation of new Medicaid work requirements will make it even harder for people with challenging medical conditions to get the healthcare they need, Attorney General Nick Brown and a coalition of 23 other attorneys general and two governors argue in a new lawsuit filed today.
The official Washington Attorney General record documents this action on June 29, 2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, premiums, benefits, Medicaid coverage, or Washington's health-benefit exchange. It does not establish an effect on Washington's uninsured rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: People under age 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
AG Brown sues over unlawful federal implementation of Medicaid work requirements The federal administration’s unlawful implementation of new Medicaid work requirements will make it even harder for people with challenging medical conditions to get the healthcare they need, Attorney General Nick Brown and a coalition of 23 other attorneys general and two governors argue in a new lawsuit filed today.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 24, 2026 · H.R.9445 · Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Washington delegation · H.R.9445
Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act
Jun 24, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Kim Schrier · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
ensure the right to provide reproductive health care services, and for other purposes
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.
Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
ensure the right to provide reproductive health care services, and for other purposes
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 24, 2026 · S.4879 · Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Washington delegation · S.4879
Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act
Jun 24, 2026 · Introduced
Sen. Patty Murray · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
ensure the right to provide reproductive health care services, and for other purposes
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.
Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
ensure the right to provide reproductive health care services, and for other purposes
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2026 · S.4540 · Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Washington delegation · S.4540
Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act
May 14, 2026 · Introduced
Sen. Patty Murray · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
amend the Public Health Service Act to improve reproductive health care of individuals with disabilities
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.
Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
amend the Public Health Service Act to improve reproductive health care of individuals with disabilities
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 25, 2026 · SB 6182 · Establishing an abortion savings program. · Enacted · Chapter 228Washington Legislature · SB 6182
Establishing an abortion savings program.
Mar 25, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 228
Sen. Jessica Bateman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Establishing an abortion savings program. AN ACT Relating to establishing an abortion savings program;
The official Washington Legislature record shows the measure was enacted by March 25, 2026 as Chapter 228.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.
Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Establishing an abortion savings program. AN ACT Relating to establishing an abortion savings program;
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 25, 2026 · SB 6182 · Signed SB 6182: Relating to establishing an abortion savings program. · Official action recordedGovernor · SB 6182
Signed SB 6182: Relating to establishing an abortion savings program.
Mar 25, 2026 · Official action recorded
Gov. Bob Ferguson · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Relating to establishing an abortion savings program.
The official Washington Governor record documents this action on March 25, 2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.
Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Relating to establishing an abortion savings program.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Washington officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Washington candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
66 statements from 14 candidates
2026 Washington U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 10 statements
During my time in Congress, I have focused on making health care work better for patients and providers. That is why I introduced the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act to streamline health insurance red tape to deliver quality care faster. Due to the overwhelming bipartisan support for my…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
During my time in Congress, I have focused on making health care work better for patients and providers. That is why I introduced the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act to streamline health insurance red tape to deliver quality care faster. Due to the overwhelming bipartisan support for my legislation, the federal government implemented many elements of the bill, and I am now focused on cementing that policy into law so that insurance plans will be held accountable for delaying or denying medically necessary care that seniors are entitled to.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
I support getting America to universal quality coverage and the best way to incentivize competition is to give people a choice between public and private coverage options. We must make it easier and more affordable for small businesses to provide health coverage for their employees.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
I support getting America to universal quality coverage and the best way to incentivize competition is to give people a choice between public and private coverage options. We must make it easier and more affordable for small businesses to provide health coverage for their employees.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
I support policies to lower the cost of living, reduce taxes for working families and ensure the wealthy pay their fair share. I’m fighting to lower health care premiums, roll back the cruel cuts to Medicaid, and end President Trump’s reckless tariffs.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
I support policies to lower the cost of living, reduce taxes for working families and ensure the wealthy pay their fair share. I’m fighting to lower health care premiums, roll back the cruel cuts to Medicaid, and end President Trump’s reckless tariffs.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Medicare is a cornerstone of our nation’s health care system. I am committed to protecting it and will fight against any efforts to privatize or dismantle Medicare. The focus instead should be on controlling the rising costs of care and improving the quality of care our seniors receive. That’s why I…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Medicare is a cornerstone of our nation’s health care system. I am committed to protecting it and will fight against any efforts to privatize or dismantle Medicare. The focus instead should be on controlling the rising costs of care and improving the quality of care our seniors receive. That’s why I championed policies that now allow the government to negotiate lower prescription drug prices in Medicare, cap insulin prices at $35 per month, and cap out-of-pocket drug costs for seniors at $2,000 annually. These commonsense reforms are costs for seniors and improve access to care. Moving forward, we must extend these hard-fought cost savings to all Americans, not just those with Medicare.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
To help working families, I’ve led on permanently expanding the Child Tax Credit, which would send monthly checks to families and cut child poverty in half. I’ve introduced bipartisan legislation to spur the creation of two million affordable homes. It’s past time to reform our immigration system an…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reproductive rights
Candidate campaign source
To help working families, I’ve led on permanently expanding the Child Tax Credit, which would send monthly checks to families and cut child poverty in half. I’ve introduced bipartisan legislation to spur the creation of two million affordable homes. It’s past time to reform our immigration system and rein in out-of-control ICE agents who have spread fear and violence in our communities. Unlike MAGA Republicans, I’m committed to strengthening Social Security and Medicare. I strongly support reproductive rights and will do everything I can to fight back against Republican extremists’ attempts to pass a nationwide abortion ban.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Medicaid, called Apple Health in Washington, along with the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) provide coverage to nearly 80 million people nationwide, including more than 1.8 million Washingtonians. These programs play a crucial role in providing families access to health care. However, the…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Medicaid, called Apple Health in Washington, along with the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) provide coverage to nearly 80 million people nationwide, including more than 1.8 million Washingtonians. These programs play a crucial role in providing families access to health care. However, the Republican’s Big, Ugly Bill, gave substantial tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans and paid for them by slashing Medicaid funding by $1 trillion. These cuts include at least $3 billion from Apple Health each year. We must reverse these cruel, Republican cuts to Medicaid when Democrats take back the House Majority.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We cannot go back to the days when someone could be denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition or when you could be charged more for coverage for simply being a woman. That’s why I have consistently voted to protect the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and build on it. I championed the passage of …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
We cannot go back to the days when someone could be denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition or when you could be charged more for coverage for simply being a woman. That’s why I have consistently voted to protect the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and build on it. I championed the passage of the American Rescue Plan in 2021, which included the first major expansion of the advanced premium tax credits since the ACA’s initial passage, which helped nearly 22 million people across the country enroll in affordable, quality health care. However, Congressional Republicans let these tax credits expire at the end of 2025. Because Congress failed to extend them, Washingtonians enrolled in health plans through WA Healthplanfinder are seeing their premiums increase by an average of 65 percent. This will cause tens of thousands of Washingtonians to lose their health care coverage.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
I am working to ensure the ACA tax credits are permanent. In January 2026, House Democrats fought for legislation to extend them for three years. While this effort passed the House of Representatives, Republicans in the Senate stalled this effort, leaving many Americans with rising health care costs…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
I am working to ensure the ACA tax credits are permanent. In January 2026, House Democrats fought for legislation to extend them for three years. While this effort passed the House of Representatives, Republicans in the Senate stalled this effort, leaving many Americans with rising health care costs. The fight isn’t over, and I’m still working everyday to restore this critical program.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
An extreme Republican supermajority on the Supreme Court has now stripped women of their constitutional right to an abortion. This is the culmination of 50 years of Republicans’ assault on women and now millions of women have lost the ability to make their own health care decisions. While Washington…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Securing Reproductive Rights
Candidate campaign source
An extreme Republican supermajority on the Supreme Court has now stripped women of their constitutional right to an abortion. This is the culmination of 50 years of Republicans’ assault on women and now millions of women have lost the ability to make their own health care decisions. While Washington protects abortion access in law, Republicans have been clear they want to pass a nationwide abortion ban. We cannot let this happen. We cannot let our daughters have less freedom than we have enjoyed for nearly a half-century. Moreover, our clinics have experienced an unprecedented influx of out-of-state patients seeking life-saving medical care.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
While our economy grew because of Democrats’ economic policies, including the expansion of the Child Tax Credit, under the Trump administration many families are struggling with rising costs including the price of gas, housing, and child care. I’m committed to creating an economy that works for ever…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economic Security and Rising Costs for Families
Candidate campaign source
While our economy grew because of Democrats’ economic policies, including the expansion of the Child Tax Credit, under the Trump administration many families are struggling with rising costs including the price of gas, housing, and child care. I’m committed to creating an economy that works for everyone by helping our small businesses and local industries rebuild so they can support good-paying jobs for years to come, including in the aerospace, manufacturing, high-tech, sustainable agriculture, clean energy, and health care industries. We must support businesses that are creating jobs and invest in the training, education, and skills of our workers to ensure they are prepared for success. This has been a long-term commitment of mine since I secured $200 million to expand job training opportunities during my first term in Congress.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
My focus is simple: to help ease the burdens families are facing, to improve access to education and healthcare, to ensure that those who have served this community and country are treated with respect and dignity.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Affordability, education, health care, and service members
Candidate campaign source
My focus is simple: to help ease the burdens families are facing, to improve access to education and healthcare, to ensure that those who have served this community and country are treated with respect and dignity.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
At the same time, I have heard from many residents who are facing real challenges. The cost of living continues to rise. Housing has become more difficult to afford. Healthcare and education bring growing concerns for many families. And there are those who have served our country and communities who…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
At the same time, I have heard from many residents who are facing real challenges. The cost of living continues to rise. Housing has become more difficult to afford. Healthcare and education bring growing concerns for many families. And there are those who have served our country and communities who feel they are not receiving the full support they deserve.When I hear these concerns,I believe it is important to reflect and consider how things can be improved.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Protecting Access to Health Care. Too few Americans have access to health care that is actually affordable. Nobody should die or face bankruptcy because they can’t afford to visit their doctor. I will continue to stand up to extreme attempts to take away health care from Americans, protect Medicare,…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Marilyn's Priorities
Candidate campaign source
Protecting Access to Health Care. Too few Americans have access to health care that is actually affordable. Nobody should die or face bankruptcy because they can’t afford to visit their doctor. I will continue to stand up to extreme attempts to take away health care from Americans, protect Medicare, and make health care more affordable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
But our work is not done. Too many hard-working families, seniors, farmers, and small businesses feel squeezed by the rising cost of gas, groceries, utilities, housing, child-care, and elder-care. It’s why I oppose Trump’s tariffs, his cuts to health care and food assistance, and the cruel chaos of …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
But our work is not done. Too many hard-working families, seniors, farmers, and small businesses feel squeezed by the rising cost of gas, groceries, utilities, housing, child-care, and elder-care. It’s why I oppose Trump’s tariffs, his cuts to health care and food assistance, and the cruel chaos of this administration.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
The American people deserve a nation that is safe, just, and secure for all. This means housing and health care they can afford, stable jobs, safe neighborhoods with strong schools, and retiring with dignity. I am proud of my record to protect our civil rights and voting rights, honor tribal treatie…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
The American people deserve a nation that is safe, just, and secure for all. This means housing and health care they can afford, stable jobs, safe neighborhoods with strong schools, and retiring with dignity. I am proud of my record to protect our civil rights and voting rights, honor tribal treaties, and delivering for the people of the South Sound.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
I have long been committed to supporting care for our seniors and to strengthening Social Security and Medicare. I voted to close a longstanding coverage gap in Medicaid that locks out 4 million people nationwide, to expand Medicare to cover hearing benefits, and to lower out-of-pocket costs for Med…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
I have long been committed to supporting care for our seniors and to strengthening Social Security and Medicare. I voted to close a longstanding coverage gap in Medicaid that locks out 4 million people nationwide, to expand Medicare to cover hearing benefits, and to lower out-of-pocket costs for Medicare Part D beneficiaries. I oppose the privatization of Medicare and have called for stricter accountability for private Medicare Advantage plans. I also oppose the privatization of Social Security and support proposals that make the benefit formula more generous, use cost-of-living formulas that consider the expenses of seniors’ purchases, and preserve Social Security for the future by scrapping the cap on income subject to Social Security taxes.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
I believe health care is a right, and I support universal, affordable coverage. That is why I am fighting to reduce health care costs and expand access to high-quality health care that fits families’ budgets. I voted to lower the cost of health care and prescription drugs for working families and se…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
I believe health care is a right, and I support universal, affordable coverage. That is why I am fighting to reduce health care costs and expand access to high-quality health care that fits families’ budgets. I voted to lower the cost of health care and prescription drugs for working families and seniors: by letting Medicare negotiate drug prices, capping out-of-pocket costs for seniors, and capping the price of insulin at $35 per month. I also voted to restore the ACA tax credits for 26,000 people in Northwest Washington, as Republicans and the Trump administration removed their coverage.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
My top priority is to lower healthcare, gas, groceries, housing, childcare, and energy costs. Hardworking families should be able to put food on the table, but now, too many are struggling to make ends meet.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
My top priority is to lower healthcare, gas, groceries, housing, childcare, and energy costs. Hardworking families should be able to put food on the table, but now, too many are struggling to make ends meet.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The 2nd District is home to nearly 51,000 veterans, including many veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. I am committed to ensuring that the women and men who have served our country in uniform get the resources and services they need – whether it be health care, housing, or career training. …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Veterans and service members
Candidate campaign source
The 2nd District is home to nearly 51,000 veterans, including many veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. I am committed to ensuring that the women and men who have served our country in uniform get the resources and services they need – whether it be health care, housing, or career training. My office released a report last year: Listening to Veterans in Northwest Washington, reporting veterans' most pressing challenges and outlining policy recommendations for Congress and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The values of service and community shape my priorities in Congress. I am guided by the lessons I learned growing up in the Pacific Northwest as I fight to lower costs, bring investments home to Northwest Washington, hold the administration & ICE accountable, combat fentanyl in our communities, prot…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reproductive rights
Candidate campaign source
The values of service and community shape my priorities in Congress. I am guided by the lessons I learned growing up in the Pacific Northwest as I fight to lower costs, bring investments home to Northwest Washington, hold the administration & ICE accountable, combat fentanyl in our communities, protect reproductive freedom, build an economy that works for everyone, increase access to health care, and support our veterans.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We have made progress in the fight against the opioid epidemic in recent years, but there is more work to be done. I believe that addiction is a disease, and I am working to bring funding to local prevention and recovery services. I am also working to strengthen law enforcement’s ability to hold acc…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and substance-use response
Candidate campaign source
We have made progress in the fight against the opioid epidemic in recent years, but there is more work to be done. I believe that addiction is a disease, and I am working to bring funding to local prevention and recovery services. I am also working to strengthen law enforcement’s ability to hold accountable those who bring these drugs into our communities.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
I am working to expand fertility and family-building services that are covered under servicemembers’ and veterans’ health care to include in vitro fertilization (IVF) and adoption assistance, for servicemembers and veterans who are unable to conceive without assistance, and the option for individual…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reproductive rights
Candidate campaign source
I am working to expand fertility and family-building services that are covered under servicemembers’ and veterans’ health care to include in vitro fertilization (IVF) and adoption assistance, for servicemembers and veterans who are unable to conceive without assistance, and the option for individuals to freeze their eggs or sperm ahead of deployment to a combat zone. I have also fought for bills to provide all veterans with job-skills training and to expand veterans’ access to breast cancer screenings.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Our economy should work for everyone, but right now, too many hard-working people are struggling to make ends meet and cannot cover basic needs. Costs like groceries, health care, housing, gas, and energy are far too high. I oppose policies that raise prices on families, like sweeping tariffs and re…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Our economy should work for everyone, but right now, too many hard-working people are struggling to make ends meet and cannot cover basic needs. Costs like groceries, health care, housing, gas, and energy are far too high. I oppose policies that raise prices on families, like sweeping tariffs and reckless foreign wars, and I support practical steps that reduce costs, strengthen supply chains, lower utility bills through clean energy and efficiency and invest in transportation choices that save people money.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Healthcare costs are too high. I believe healthcare is a right, and I will fight to expand access and lower healthcare costs. Housing prices must be brought down by increasing the supply of affordable homes and investing in local infrastructure so communities can build the housing they need.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Healthcare costs are too high. I believe healthcare is a right, and I will fight to expand access and lower healthcare costs. Housing prices must be brought down by increasing the supply of affordable homes and investing in local infrastructure so communities can build the housing they need.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
I will always fight for the right to choose reproductive health care. I support suspending the filibuster to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would re-establish a nationwide right to abortion and enshrine the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law. I also support protecting a docto…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reproductive rights
Candidate campaign source
I will always fight for the right to choose reproductive health care. I support suspending the filibuster to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would re-establish a nationwide right to abortion and enshrine the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law. I also support protecting a doctor’s ability to prescribe medication abortion via telehealth to reach patients across the country, including in rural communities, and protecting a woman’s right to travel across state lines to receive abortion care.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
My office released a report in 2024: The Opioid Crisis in Washington’s Second Congressional District and a Comprehensive Solution (PDF). Congress and the administration can and must do more to coordinate with local governments, Tribal communities, law enforcement, health care providers and community…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
My office released a report in 2024: The Opioid Crisis in Washington’s Second Congressional District and a Comprehensive Solution (PDF). Congress and the administration can and must do more to coordinate with local governments, Tribal communities, law enforcement, health care providers and community partners to tackle the opioid epidemic and help individuals suffering from opioid addiction – and I will lead that work.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Washington candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Washington incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Washington legislators and Washington’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Washington’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
192 matching sponsorships or proposals · 66 Washington incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Alicia Rule
Washington House of Representatives, District 42 · D–WA
Promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods.
Mar 5, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Alicia Rule · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods. AN ACT Relating to promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods;
The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on March 5, 2024: First reading, referred to Health Care & Wellness.. The measure did not pass before the 2023-24 biennium ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.
Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods. AN ACT Relating to promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods;
Protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers.
Mar 26, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 288
Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers. AN ACT Relating to protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers;
The official Washington Legislature record shows the measure was enacted by March 26, 2024 as Chapter 288.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers. AN ACT Relating to protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers;
Concerning the restoration of the right to possess a firearm.
Jan 10, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Concerning the restoration of the right to possess a firearm. AN ACT Relating to the restoration of the right to possess a firearm;
The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 10, 2022: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2021-22 biennium ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Concerning the restoration of the right to possess a firearm. AN ACT Relating to the restoration of the right to possess a firearm;
Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses.
Jan 10, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses. AN ACT Relating to prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses;
The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 10, 2022: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2021-22 biennium ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses. AN ACT Relating to prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses;
Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses.
Mar 12, 2020 · Did not pass
Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses. AN ACT Relating to prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses;
The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on March 12, 2020: By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses. AN ACT Relating to prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses;
Concerning reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition.
Jan 15, 2020 · Did not pass
Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Concerning reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition. AN ACT Relating to reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition;
The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 15, 2020: First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Concerning reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition. AN ACT Relating to reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition;
Washington House of Representatives, District 2 · R–WA
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Andrew BarkisWashington Legislature · HB 1228
Addressing residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency.
Jan 10, 2022 · Did not pass
Rep. Andrew Barkis · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Addressing residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency. AN ACT Relating to residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency;
The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 10, 2022: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2021-22 biennium ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, rental assistance, eviction, or the supply and affordability of rental housing. It does not establish an effect on Washington's median gross rent.
Retained Washington evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Addressing residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency. AN ACT Relating to residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency;
Enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences.
Feb 19, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Beth Doglio · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences. AN ACT Relating to enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences and by directing the Washington office of firearm safety and violence prevention to provide education regarding firearm secure storage;
The latest official Washington Legislature record shows this action on February 19, 2026: House Rules "X" file..
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences. AN ACT Relating to enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences and by directing the Washington office of firearm safety and violence prevention to provide education regarding firearm secure storage;
Concerning firearms laws concerning persons subject to vulnerable adult protection orders. AN ACT Relating to firearms laws concerning persons subject to vulnerable adult protection orders;
The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on March 12, 2020: By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Concerning firearms laws concerning persons subject to vulnerable adult protection orders. AN ACT Relating to firearms laws concerning persons subject to vulnerable adult protection orders;
Requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place.
Jan 13, 2020 · Did not pass
Rep. Beth Doglio · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place. AN ACT Relating to requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place;
The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 13, 2020: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place. AN ACT Relating to requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place;
Reporting lost or stolen firearms. AN ACT Relating to reporting lost or stolen firearms;
The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 13, 2020: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Reporting lost or stolen firearms. AN ACT Relating to reporting lost or stolen firearms;
Improving access to abortion medications. AN ACT Relating to improving access to abortion medications;
The latest official Washington Legislature record shows this action on January 27, 2026: Referred to Appropriations..
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.
Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Improving access to abortion medications. AN ACT Relating to improving access to abortion medications;
Washington House of Representatives, District 28 · D–WA
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Dan BronoskeWashington Legislature · HB 1719
Concerning use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies.
Mar 4, 2022 · Enacted · Chapter 3
Rep. Dan Bronoske · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Concerning use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies. AN ACT Relating to modifying the restrictions on the use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies as it pertains to firearms and ammunition but only with respect to removing the restriction on ammunition, narrowing the restriction on firearms to include only rifles of .50 caliber or greater, and clarifying that the restrictions do not apply to shotguns, devices designed or used to deploy less lethal munitions, and less lethal equipment;
The official Washington Legislature record shows the measure was enacted by March 4, 2022 as Chapter 3.
Why this record is included
The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.
Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Concerning use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies. AN ACT Relating to modifying the restrictions on the use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies as it pertains to firearms and ammunition but only with respect to removing the restriction on ammunition, narrowing the restriction on firearms to include only rifles of .50 caliber or greater, and clarifying that the restrictions do not apply to shotguns, devices designed or used to deploy less lethal munitions, and less lethal equipment;
Only current Washington officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Washington statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Washington snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Washington, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.