Washington · individual fact

Washington health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages6.5%2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 657.8%2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6573.9%2024 · #17 of 50 · highest first

Washington over time

Explore Washington readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Washington officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Washington effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Washington change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Washington · source units
WashingtonPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 6.5%5%7.6%10.2%Washington, 2014: 9.2%Washington, 2015: 6.6%Washington, 2016: 6%Washington, 2017: 6.1%Washington, 2018: 6.4%Washington, 2019: 6.6%Washington, 2021: 6.4%Washington, 2022: 6.1%Washington, 2023: 6.3%Washington, 2024: 6.5%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Washington Legislature · 181323422322215525332526282242● U.S. Congress · Washington delegation · 112◆ Governor · 6■ Washington agencies · 62010-03-012026-06-30

204 of 204 reviewed Washington actions match · 79 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

Washington · 2024: 6.5% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Washington Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodWashingtonRankU.S. benchmark
20246.5%#32 of 508.2%
20236.3%#29 of 50Not available
20226.1%#32 of 50Not available
20216.4%#32 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20196.6%#34 of 50Not available
20186.4%#34 of 50Not available
20176.1%#33 of 50Not available
20166%#35 of 50Not available
20156.6%#34 of 50Not available
20149.2%#32 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Washington · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Washington · 20246.5%
Washington rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Washington
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Washington5.5%7.6%9.7%20142024
2024 · Washington: 6.5% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Washington Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodWashingtonCompare
20149.2%
20156.6%
20166%
20176.1%
20186.4%
20196.6%
2020Not available
20216.4%
20226.1%
20236.3%
20246.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · 6.5%2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington · your comparison6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under age 65 without health insurance

7.8%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Washington’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate and is not the same as current Medicaid enrollment or an administrative coverage count.
  • Coverage status alone does not measure affordability, provider access, quality, or prescription-drug costs.
Washington · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Washington with every state.

Washington · 2020$9,265
Washington rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Washington
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Washington$7.21K$8.9K$10.58K20142020
2020 · Washington: $9,265 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Washington Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodWashingtonCompare
2014$7,602
2015$7,904
2016$8,097
2017$8,278
2018$8,588
2019$8,964
2020$9,265

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · $9,2652020 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington · your comparison$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Washington · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Washington · 202278.4 years
Washington rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Washington population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Washington
Life expectancy at birth history in Washington77.1 years78.8 years80.4 years20182022
2022 · Washington: 78.4 years · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Washington Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodWashingtonCompare
201880 years
201980 years
202079.2 years
202178.2 years
202278.4 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · 78.4 years2022 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington · your comparison78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Washington · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Washington · 20238.6%
Washington rank#40among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Washington
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Washington7.5%9.4%11.2%20192023
2023 · Washington: 8.6% · Rank #40 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Washington Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodWashingtonCompare
20198.6%
20207.9%
20217.9%
20228.8%
20238.6%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · 8.6%2023 · Rank #40 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 8.2% – 9%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington · your comparison8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Washington · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Washington · June 30, 202642.4%
Washington rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · 42.4%June 30, 2026 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington · your comparison42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Washington · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Washington · 2020$7,440
Washington rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · $7,4402020 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington · your comparison$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Washington · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Washington · 2023–202427.9%
Washington rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · 27.9%2023–2024 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington · your comparison27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Washington candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

66 statements from 14 candidates

2026 Washington U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 10 statements

Suzan DelBene

10 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · WA

Health coverage

During my time in Congress, I have focused on making health care work better for patients and providers. That is why I introduced the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act to streamline health insurance red tape to deliver quality care faster. Due to the overwhelming bipartisan support for my…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

During my time in Congress, I have focused on making health care work better for patients and providers. That is why I introduced the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act to streamline health insurance red tape to deliver quality care faster. Due to the overwhelming bipartisan support for my legislation, the federal government implemented many elements of the bill, and I am now focused on cementing that policy into law so that insurance plans will be held accountable for delaying or denying medically necessary care that seniors are entitled to.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
View 9 more statements from Suzan DelBene
Health coverage

I support getting America to universal quality coverage and the best way to incentivize competition is to give people a choice between public and private coverage options. We must make it easier and more affordable for small businesses to provide health coverage for their employees.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

I support getting America to universal quality coverage and the best way to incentivize competition is to give people a choice between public and private coverage options. We must make it easier and more affordable for small businesses to provide health coverage for their employees.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Health coverage

I support policies to lower the cost of living, reduce taxes for working families and ensure the wealthy pay their fair share. I’m fighting to lower health care premiums, roll back the cruel cuts to Medicaid, and end President Trump’s reckless tariffs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

I support policies to lower the cost of living, reduce taxes for working families and ensure the wealthy pay their fair share. I’m fighting to lower health care premiums, roll back the cruel cuts to Medicaid, and end President Trump’s reckless tariffs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Suzan DelBene ↗
Health coverage

Medicare is a cornerstone of our nation’s health care system. I am committed to protecting it and will fight against any efforts to privatize or dismantle Medicare. The focus instead should be on controlling the rising costs of care and improving the quality of care our seniors receive. That’s why I…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Medicare is a cornerstone of our nation’s health care system. I am committed to protecting it and will fight against any efforts to privatize or dismantle Medicare. The focus instead should be on controlling the rising costs of care and improving the quality of care our seniors receive. That’s why I championed policies that now allow the government to negotiate lower prescription drug prices in Medicare, cap insulin prices at $35 per month, and cap out-of-pocket drug costs for seniors at $2,000 annually. These commonsense reforms are costs for seniors and improve access to care. Moving forward, we must extend these hard-fought cost savings to all Americans, not just those with Medicare.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Health coverage

To help working families, I’ve led on permanently expanding the Child Tax Credit, which would send monthly checks to families and cut child poverty in half. I’ve introduced bipartisan legislation to spur the creation of two million affordable homes. It’s past time to reform our immigration system an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights

Candidate campaign source

To help working families, I’ve led on permanently expanding the Child Tax Credit, which would send monthly checks to families and cut child poverty in half. I’ve introduced bipartisan legislation to spur the creation of two million affordable homes. It’s past time to reform our immigration system and rein in out-of-control ICE agents who have spread fear and violence in our communities. Unlike MAGA Republicans, I’m committed to strengthening Social Security and Medicare. I strongly support reproductive rights and will do everything I can to fight back against Republican extremists’ attempts to pass a nationwide abortion ban.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Suzan DelBene ↗
Health coverage

Medicaid, called Apple Health in Washington, along with the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) provide coverage to nearly 80 million people nationwide, including more than 1.8 million Washingtonians. These programs play a crucial role in providing families access to health care. However, the…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Medicaid, called Apple Health in Washington, along with the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) provide coverage to nearly 80 million people nationwide, including more than 1.8 million Washingtonians. These programs play a crucial role in providing families access to health care. However, the Republican’s Big, Ugly Bill, gave substantial tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans and paid for them by slashing Medicaid funding by $1 trillion. These cuts include at least $3 billion from Apple Health each year. We must reverse these cruel, Republican cuts to Medicaid when Democrats take back the House Majority.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Health coverage

We cannot go back to the days when someone could be denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition or when you could be charged more for coverage for simply being a woman. That’s why I have consistently voted to protect the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and build on it. I championed the passage of …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

We cannot go back to the days when someone could be denied coverage because of a pre-existing condition or when you could be charged more for coverage for simply being a woman. That’s why I have consistently voted to protect the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and build on it. I championed the passage of the American Rescue Plan in 2021, which included the first major expansion of the advanced premium tax credits since the ACA’s initial passage, which helped nearly 22 million people across the country enroll in affordable, quality health care. However, Congressional Republicans let these tax credits expire at the end of 2025. Because Congress failed to extend them, Washingtonians enrolled in health plans through WA Healthplanfinder are seeing their premiums increase by an average of 65 percent. This will cause tens of thousands of Washingtonians to lose their health care coverage.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Healthcare costs

I am working to ensure the ACA tax credits are permanent. In January 2026, House Democrats fought for legislation to extend them for three years. While this effort passed the House of Representatives, Republicans in the Senate stalled this effort, leaving many Americans with rising health care costs…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

I am working to ensure the ACA tax credits are permanent. In January 2026, House Democrats fought for legislation to extend them for three years. While this effort passed the House of Representatives, Republicans in the Senate stalled this effort, leaving many Americans with rising health care costs. The fight isn’t over, and I’m still working everyday to restore this critical program.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Care & public health

An extreme Republican supermajority on the Supreme Court has now stripped women of their constitutional right to an abortion. This is the culmination of 50 years of Republicans’ assault on women and now millions of women have lost the ability to make their own health care decisions. While Washington…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Securing Reproductive Rights

Candidate campaign source

An extreme Republican supermajority on the Supreme Court has now stripped women of their constitutional right to an abortion. This is the culmination of 50 years of Republicans’ assault on women and now millions of women have lost the ability to make their own health care decisions. While Washington protects abortion access in law, Republicans have been clear they want to pass a nationwide abortion ban. We cannot let this happen. We cannot let our daughters have less freedom than we have enjoyed for nearly a half-century. Moreover, our clinics have experienced an unprecedented influx of out-of-state patients seeking life-saving medical care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 11 ↗
Care & public health

While our economy grew because of Democrats’ economic policies, including the expansion of the Child Tax Credit, under the Trump administration many families are struggling with rising costs including the price of gas, housing, and child care. I’m committed to creating an economy that works for ever…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economic Security and Rising Costs for Families

Candidate campaign source

While our economy grew because of Democrats’ economic policies, including the expansion of the Child Tax Credit, under the Trump administration many families are struggling with rising costs including the price of gas, housing, and child care. I’m committed to creating an economy that works for everyone by helping our small businesses and local industries rebuild so they can support good-paying jobs for years to come, including in the aerospace, manufacturing, high-tech, sustainable agriculture, clean energy, and health care industries. We must support businesses that are creating jobs and invest in the training, education, and skills of our workers to ensure they are prepared for success. This has been a long-term commitment of mine since I secured $200 million to expand job training opportunities during my first term in Congress.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗

2026 Washington U.S. House — District 10 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements

Chris D. Chung

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 10 · WA

Care & public health

My focus is simple: to help ease the burdens families are facing, to improve access to education and healthcare, to ensure that those who have served this community and country are treated with respect and dignity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability, education, health care, and service members

Candidate campaign source

My focus is simple: to help ease the burdens families are facing, to improve access to education and healthcare, to ensure that those who have served this community and country are treated with respect and dignity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Chris D. Chung ↗
View 1 more statement from Chris D. Chung
Care & public health

At the same time, I have heard from many residents who are facing real challenges. The cost of living continues to rise. Housing has become more difficult to afford. Healthcare and education bring growing concerns for many families. And there are those who have served our country and communities who…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

At the same time, I have heard from many residents who are facing real challenges. The cost of living continues to rise. Housing has become more difficult to afford. Healthcare and education bring growing concerns for many families. And there are those who have served our country and communities who feel they are not receiving the full support they deserve.When I hear these concerns,I believe it is important to reflect and consider how things can be improved.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Chris D. Chung ↗

Marilyn Strickland

6 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 10 · WA

Health coverage

Protect Medicare benefits and access for eligible Americans.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Medicare

Candidate campaign source

Protect Medicare benefits and access for eligible Americans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Marilyn Strickland — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 5 more statements from Marilyn Strickland
Health coverage

Protecting Access to Health Care. Too few Americans have access to health care that is actually affordable. Nobody should die or face bankruptcy because they can’t afford to visit their doctor. I will continue to stand up to extreme attempts to take away health care from Americans, protect Medicare,…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Marilyn's Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Protecting Access to Health Care. Too few Americans have access to health care that is actually affordable. Nobody should die or face bankruptcy because they can’t afford to visit their doctor. I will continue to stand up to extreme attempts to take away health care from Americans, protect Medicare, and make health care more affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Marilyn Strickland — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Protect Americans' access to health care.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health-Care Access

Candidate campaign source

Protect Americans' access to health care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Marilyn Strickland — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Expand career training for nursing, health care, teaching, and building-trades occupations.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Career Training

Candidate campaign source

Expand career training for nursing, health care, teaching, and building-trades occupations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Marilyn Strickland — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

But our work is not done. Too many hard-working families, seniors, farmers, and small businesses feel squeezed by the rising cost of gas, groceries, utilities, housing, child-care, and elder-care. It’s why I oppose Trump’s tariffs, his cuts to health care and food assistance, and the cruel chaos of …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

But our work is not done. Too many hard-working families, seniors, farmers, and small businesses feel squeezed by the rising cost of gas, groceries, utilities, housing, child-care, and elder-care. It’s why I oppose Trump’s tariffs, his cuts to health care and food assistance, and the cruel chaos of this administration.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Marilyn Strickland ↗
Care & public health

The American people deserve a nation that is safe, just, and secure for all. This means housing and health care they can afford, stable jobs, safe neighborhoods with strong schools, and retiring with dignity. I am proud of my record to protect our civil rights and voting rights, honor tribal treatie…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

The American people deserve a nation that is safe, just, and secure for all. This means housing and health care they can afford, stable jobs, safe neighborhoods with strong schools, and retiring with dignity. I am proud of my record to protect our civil rights and voting rights, honor tribal treaties, and delivering for the people of the South Sound.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Marilyn Strickland ↗

2026 Washington U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 11 statements

Rick Larsen

11 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · WA

Health coverage

I have long been committed to supporting care for our seniors and to strengthening Social Security and Medicare. I voted to close a longstanding coverage gap in Medicaid that locks out 4 million people nationwide, to expand Medicare to cover hearing benefits, and to lower out-of-pocket costs for Med…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

I have long been committed to supporting care for our seniors and to strengthening Social Security and Medicare. I voted to close a longstanding coverage gap in Medicaid that locks out 4 million people nationwide, to expand Medicare to cover hearing benefits, and to lower out-of-pocket costs for Medicare Part D beneficiaries. I oppose the privatization of Medicare and have called for stricter accountability for private Medicare Advantage plans. I also oppose the privatization of Social Security and support proposals that make the benefit formula more generous, use cost-of-living formulas that consider the expenses of seniors’ purchases, and preserve Social Security for the future by scrapping the cap on income subject to Social Security taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Rick Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 10 more statements from Rick Larsen
Health coverage

I believe health care is a right, and I support universal, affordable coverage. That is why I am fighting to reduce health care costs and expand access to high-quality health care that fits families’ budgets. I voted to lower the cost of health care and prescription drugs for working families and se…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

I believe health care is a right, and I support universal, affordable coverage. That is why I am fighting to reduce health care costs and expand access to high-quality health care that fits families’ budgets. I voted to lower the cost of health care and prescription drugs for working families and seniors: by letting Medicare negotiate drug prices, capping out-of-pocket costs for seniors, and capping the price of insulin at $35 per month. I also voted to restore the ACA tax credits for 26,000 people in Northwest Washington, as Republicans and the Trump administration removed their coverage.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Rick Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

My top priority is to lower healthcare, gas, groceries, housing, childcare, and energy costs. Hardworking families should be able to put food on the table, but now, too many are struggling to make ends meet.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

My top priority is to lower healthcare, gas, groceries, housing, childcare, and energy costs. Hardworking families should be able to put food on the table, but now, too many are struggling to make ends meet.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Rick Larsen ↗
Care & public health

The 2nd District is home to nearly 51,000 veterans, including many veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. I am committed to ensuring that the women and men who have served our country in uniform get the resources and services they need – whether it be health care, housing, or career training. …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Veterans and service members

Candidate campaign source

The 2nd District is home to nearly 51,000 veterans, including many veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. I am committed to ensuring that the women and men who have served our country in uniform get the resources and services they need – whether it be health care, housing, or career training. My office released a report last year: Listening to Veterans in Northwest Washington, reporting veterans' most pressing challenges and outlining policy recommendations for Congress and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Rick Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

The values of service and community shape my priorities in Congress. I am guided by the lessons I learned growing up in the Pacific Northwest as I fight to lower costs, bring investments home to Northwest Washington, hold the administration & ICE accountable, combat fentanyl in our communities, prot…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights

Candidate campaign source

The values of service and community shape my priorities in Congress. I am guided by the lessons I learned growing up in the Pacific Northwest as I fight to lower costs, bring investments home to Northwest Washington, hold the administration & ICE accountable, combat fentanyl in our communities, protect reproductive freedom, build an economy that works for everyone, increase access to health care, and support our veterans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Rick Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Care & public health

We have made progress in the fight against the opioid epidemic in recent years, but there is more work to be done. I believe that addiction is a disease, and I am working to bring funding to local prevention and recovery services. I am also working to strengthen law enforcement’s ability to hold acc…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and substance-use response

Candidate campaign source

We have made progress in the fight against the opioid epidemic in recent years, but there is more work to be done. I believe that addiction is a disease, and I am working to bring funding to local prevention and recovery services. I am also working to strengthen law enforcement’s ability to hold accountable those who bring these drugs into our communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Rick Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

I am working to expand fertility and family-building services that are covered under servicemembers’ and veterans’ health care to include in vitro fertilization (IVF) and adoption assistance, for servicemembers and veterans who are unable to conceive without assistance, and the option for individual…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights

Candidate campaign source

I am working to expand fertility and family-building services that are covered under servicemembers’ and veterans’ health care to include in vitro fertilization (IVF) and adoption assistance, for servicemembers and veterans who are unable to conceive without assistance, and the option for individuals to freeze their eggs or sperm ahead of deployment to a combat zone. I have also fought for bills to provide all veterans with job-skills training and to expand veterans’ access to breast cancer screenings.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Rick Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Our economy should work for everyone, but right now, too many hard-working people are struggling to make ends meet and cannot cover basic needs. Costs like groceries, health care, housing, gas, and energy are far too high. I oppose policies that raise prices on families, like sweeping tariffs and re…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Our economy should work for everyone, but right now, too many hard-working people are struggling to make ends meet and cannot cover basic needs. Costs like groceries, health care, housing, gas, and energy are far too high. I oppose policies that raise prices on families, like sweeping tariffs and reckless foreign wars, and I support practical steps that reduce costs, strengthen supply chains, lower utility bills through clean energy and efficiency and invest in transportation choices that save people money.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Rick Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Healthcare costs

Healthcare costs are too high. I believe healthcare is a right, and I will fight to expand access and lower healthcare costs. Housing prices must be brought down by increasing the supply of affordable homes and investing in local infrastructure so communities can build the housing they need.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare costs are too high. I believe healthcare is a right, and I will fight to expand access and lower healthcare costs. Housing prices must be brought down by increasing the supply of affordable homes and investing in local infrastructure so communities can build the housing they need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Rick Larsen ↗
Care & public health

I will always fight for the right to choose reproductive health care. I support suspending the filibuster to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would re-establish a nationwide right to abortion and enshrine the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law. I also support protecting a docto…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights

Candidate campaign source

I will always fight for the right to choose reproductive health care. I support suspending the filibuster to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would re-establish a nationwide right to abortion and enshrine the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law. I also support protecting a doctor’s ability to prescribe medication abortion via telehealth to reach patients across the country, including in rural communities, and protecting a woman’s right to travel across state lines to receive abortion care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Rick Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

My office released a report in 2024: The Opioid Crisis in Washington’s Second Congressional District and a Comprehensive Solution (PDF). Congress and the administration can and must do more to coordinate with local governments, Tribal communities, law enforcement, health care providers and community…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

My office released a report in 2024: The Opioid Crisis in Washington’s Second Congressional District and a Comprehensive Solution (PDF). Congress and the administration can and must do more to coordinate with local governments, Tribal communities, law enforcement, health care providers and community partners to tackle the opioid epidemic and help individuals suffering from opioid addiction – and I will lead that work.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Rick Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 4
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Washington candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Washington incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Washington legislators and Washington’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Washington’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

192 matching sponsorships or proposals · 66 Washington incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Alicia Rule

Washington House of Representatives, District 42 · D–WA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Alicia Rule
Washington Legislature · HB 2502

Promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods.

Mar 5, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Alicia Rule · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods. AN ACT Relating to promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on March 5, 2024: First reading, referred to Health Care & Wellness.. The measure did not pass before the 2023-24 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.

Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods. AN ACT Relating to promoting reproductive autonomy by protecting access to contraceptive methods;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Amy Walen

Washington House of Representatives, District 48 · D–WA

5 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Amy Walen
Washington Legislature · HB 2118

Protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers.

Mar 26, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 288

Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers. AN ACT Relating to protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers;

The official Washington Legislature record shows the measure was enacted by March 26, 2024 as Chapter 288.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers. AN ACT Relating to protecting the public from gun violence by establishing additional requirements for the business operations of licensed firearms dealers;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Washington Legislature · HB 1026

Concerning the restoration of the right to possess a firearm.

Jan 10, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Concerning the restoration of the right to possess a firearm. AN ACT Relating to the restoration of the right to possess a firearm;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 10, 2022: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2021-22 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Concerning the restoration of the right to possess a firearm. AN ACT Relating to the restoration of the right to possess a firearm;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Washington Legislature · HB 1038

Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses.

Jan 10, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses. AN ACT Relating to prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 10, 2022: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2021-22 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses. AN ACT Relating to prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Washington Legislature · HB 2623

Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses.

Mar 12, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses. AN ACT Relating to prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on March 12, 2020: By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses. AN ACT Relating to prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons convicted of certain criminal offenses;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Washington Legislature · HB 2519

Concerning reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition.

Jan 15, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Amy Walen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Concerning reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition. AN ACT Relating to reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 15, 2020: First reading, referred to Civil Rights & Judiciary.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Concerning reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition. AN ACT Relating to reasonable public safety measures to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring ammunition;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Andrew Barkis

Washington House of Representatives, District 2 · R–WA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Andrew Barkis
Washington Legislature · HB 1228

Addressing residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency.

Jan 10, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Andrew Barkis · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Addressing residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency. AN ACT Relating to residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 10, 2022: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2021-22 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses residential rent, tenant protections, rental assistance, eviction, or the supply and affordability of rental housing. It does not establish an effect on Washington's median gross rent.

Retained Washington evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Addressing residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency. AN ACT Relating to residential landlord-tenant requirements in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Beth Doglio

Washington House of Representatives, District 22 · D–WA

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Beth Doglio
Washington Legislature · HB 1152

Enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences.

Feb 19, 2026 · Introduced

Rep. Beth Doglio · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences. AN ACT Relating to enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences and by directing the Washington office of firearm safety and violence prevention to provide education regarding firearm secure storage;

The latest official Washington Legislature record shows this action on February 19, 2026: House Rules "X" file..

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences. AN ACT Relating to enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences and by directing the Washington office of firearm safety and violence prevention to provide education regarding firearm secure storage;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Washington Legislature · HB 2305

Concerning firearms laws concerning persons subject to vulnerable adult protection orders.

Mar 12, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Beth Doglio · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Concerning firearms laws concerning persons subject to vulnerable adult protection orders. AN ACT Relating to firearms laws concerning persons subject to vulnerable adult protection orders;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on March 12, 2020: By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Concerning firearms laws concerning persons subject to vulnerable adult protection orders. AN ACT Relating to firearms laws concerning persons subject to vulnerable adult protection orders;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Washington Legislature · HB 1439

Requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place.

Jan 13, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Beth Doglio · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place. AN ACT Relating to requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 13, 2020: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place. AN ACT Relating to requiring permission to bring a concealed firearm into another person's residence or dwelling place;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Washington Legislature · HB 1203

Reporting lost or stolen firearms.

Jan 13, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Beth Doglio · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Reporting lost or stolen firearms. AN ACT Relating to reporting lost or stolen firearms;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 13, 2020: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Reporting lost or stolen firearms. AN ACT Relating to reporting lost or stolen firearms;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brianna Thomas

Washington House of Representatives, District 34 · D–WA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brianna Thomas
Washington Legislature · HB 2182

Improving access to abortion medications.

Jan 27, 2026 · Referred to Appropriations.

Rep. Brianna Thomas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Improving access to abortion medications. AN ACT Relating to improving access to abortion medications;

The latest official Washington Legislature record shows this action on January 27, 2026: Referred to Appropriations..

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.

Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Improving access to abortion medications. AN ACT Relating to improving access to abortion medications;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Dan Bronoske

Washington House of Representatives, District 28 · D–WA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Dan Bronoske
Washington Legislature · HB 1719

Concerning use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies.

Mar 4, 2022 · Enacted · Chapter 3

Rep. Dan Bronoske · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Concerning use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies. AN ACT Relating to modifying the restrictions on the use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies as it pertains to firearms and ammunition but only with respect to removing the restriction on ammunition, narrowing the restriction on firearms to include only rifles of .50 caliber or greater, and clarifying that the restrictions do not apply to shotguns, devices designed or used to deploy less lethal munitions, and less lethal equipment;

The official Washington Legislature record shows the measure was enacted by March 4, 2022 as Chapter 3.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Concerning use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies. AN ACT Relating to modifying the restrictions on the use and acquisition of military equipment by law enforcement agencies as it pertains to firearms and ammunition but only with respect to removing the restriction on ammunition, narrowing the restriction on firearms to include only rifles of .50 caliber or greater, and clarifying that the restrictions do not apply to shotguns, devices designed or used to deploy less lethal munitions, and less lethal equipment;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Washington officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Washington statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.