Vermont · individual fact

Vermont health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages4.2%2024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 655.4%2024 · #48 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6574.2%2024 · #16 of 50 · highest first

Vermont over time

Explore Vermont readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Vermont officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Vermont effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Vermont change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Vermont · source units
VermontPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 4.2%2.4%5.8%9.2%Vermont, 2014: 5%Vermont, 2015: 3.8%Vermont, 2016: 3.7%Vermont, 2017: 4.6%Vermont, 2018: 4%Vermont, 2019: 4.5%Vermont, 2021: 3.7%Vermont, 2022: 3.9%Vermont, 2023: 3.4%Vermont, 2024: 4.2%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Vermont Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · Vermont delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 3■ Vermont agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2010-03-012026-07-31

5 of 5 reviewed Vermont actions match · 5 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

Vermont · 2024: 4.2% · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Vermont Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodVermontRankU.S. benchmark
20244.2%#48 of 508.2%
20233.4%#48 of 50Not available
20223.9%#48 of 50Not available
20213.7%#49 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20194.5%#47 of 50Not available
20184%#49 of 50Not available
20174.6%#46 of 50Not available
20163.7%#48 of 50Not available
20153.8%#49 of 50Not available
20145%#49 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Vermont · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Vermont · 20244.2%
Vermont rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Vermont2.7%5.8%8.9%20142024
2024 · Vermont: 4.2% · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodVermontCompare
20145%
20153.8%
20163.7%
20174.6%
20184%
20194.5%
2020Not available
20213.7%
20223.9%
20233.4%
20244.2%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · 4.2%2024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont · your comparison4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

5.4%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Vermont’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
Vermont · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Vermont with every state.

Vermont · 2020$12,756
Vermont rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Vermont$7.22K$10.35K$13.48K20142020
2020 · Vermont: $12,756 · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodVermontCompare
2014$10,589
2015$11,010
2016$11,246
2017$11,521
2018$11,797
2019$12,159
2020$12,756

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · $12,7562020 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont · your comparison$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Vermont · 202278.3 years
Vermont rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Vermont population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Life expectancy at birth history in Vermont77.2 years78.7 years80.1 years20182022
2022 · Vermont: 78.3 years · Rank #14 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodVermontCompare
201879.3 years
201979.8 years
202078.8 years
202178.4 years
202278.3 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · 78.3 years2022 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont · your comparison78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Vermont · 20237.8%
Vermont rank#48among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Vermont6.2%8.8%11.4%20192023
2023 · Vermont: 7.8% · Rank #48 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodVermontCompare
20197.4%
20206.8%
20217.2%
20227%
20237.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · 7.8%2023 · Rank #48 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 7% – 8.7%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont · your comparison7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Vermont · June 30, 202682.6%
Vermont rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · 82.6%June 30, 2026 · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont · your comparison82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Vermont · 2020$7,868
Vermont rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · $7,8682020 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont · your comparison$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Vermont · 2023–202429.1%
Vermont rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · 29.1%2023–2024 · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont · your comparison29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Vermont candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

47 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Vermont Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Charity R. Clark

1 statement

Democratic · Attorney General · VT

Healthcare costs

Brought litigation against pharmacy benefit managers described by the campaign as contributing to inflated prescription-drug prices.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Prescription Costs

Candidate campaign source

Brought litigation against pharmacy benefit managers described by the campaign as contributing to inflated prescription-drug prices.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Charity R. Clark — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Vermont Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 23 statements

Amanda Janoo

22 statements

Democratic/Progressive · Governor · VT

Care & public health

Invest upstream rather than paying for crises downstream. By providing children and families with healthcare, counseling, childcare, food assistance, housing support, and other services before problems become emergencies, we can improve educational outcomes while reducing long-term costs in healthca…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

Invest upstream rather than paying for crises downstream. By providing children and families with healthcare, counseling, childcare, food assistance, housing support, and other services before problems become emergencies, we can improve educational outcomes while reducing long-term costs in healthcare, corrections, child welfare, homelessness, and special education. Research consistently shows that community schools improve attendance, behavior, graduation rates, and academic achievement because they remove barriers to learning before they become crises.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 21 more statements from Amanda Janoo
Healthcare costs

Lay the foundation for universal healthcare by creating the nation’s first publicly funded universal primary care system—improving health, lowering overall healthcare costs, rebuilding community-based care, and creating the infrastructure needed to expand toward comprehensive universal healthcare ov…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Lay the foundation for universal healthcare by creating the nation’s first publicly funded universal primary care system—improving health, lowering overall healthcare costs, rebuilding community-based care, and creating the infrastructure needed to expand toward comprehensive universal healthcare over time by exploring partnerships with neighboring states as a way to achieve this in the years to come. This plan will be funded through our Fair Share Tax Proposal, which asks the wealthiest Vermonters to contribute the equivalent cuts from the Big Beautiful Bill. Those who have benefited most from decades of rising wealth and tax cuts should help ensure every Vermonter can access the healthcare they need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Guarantee free primary and preventive healthcare for every Vermonter by eliminating copays, deductibles, and insurance barriers, making primary care the front door to a future universal healthcare system.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Guarantee free primary and preventive healthcare for every Vermonter by eliminating copays, deductibles, and insurance barriers, making primary care the front door to a future universal healthcare system.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Strengthen healthcare resilience by supporting independent pharmacies, expanding regional purchasing partnerships, maintaining reserves of essential medicines and medical supplies, and reducing Vermont’s dependence on fragile national supply chains and changing federal policies.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen healthcare resilience by supporting independent pharmacies, expanding regional purchasing partnerships, maintaining reserves of essential medicines and medical supplies, and reducing Vermont’s dependence on fragile national supply chains and changing federal policies.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Expand participatory budgeting and community decision-making by giving communities greater direct authority over public spending while supporting locally led planning for housing, economic development, healthcare, and other community priorities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Democracy, ethics, and the rule of law

Candidate campaign source

Expand participatory budgeting and community decision-making by giving communities greater direct authority over public spending while supporting locally led planning for housing, economic development, healthcare, and other community priorities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

End homelessness through a Housing First approach, ensuring every Vermonter has rapid access to safe, permanent housing alongside voluntary mental health care, substance use treatment, employment assistance, and other wraparound services that help people rebuild their lives.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

End homelessness through a Housing First approach, ensuring every Vermonter has rapid access to safe, permanent housing alongside voluntary mental health care, substance use treatment, employment assistance, and other wraparound services that help people rebuild their lives.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

By making primary and preventive care free and investing in community-based healthcare, Vermont can improve health outcomes while dramatically reducing the need for costly emergency room visits, avoidable hospitalizations, and expensive specialist care. Every dollar we invest upstream in prevention …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

By making primary and preventive care free and investing in community-based healthcare, Vermont can improve health outcomes while dramatically reducing the need for costly emergency room visits, avoidable hospitalizations, and expensive specialist care. Every dollar we invest upstream in prevention saves money downstream by reducing the burden of chronic disease, improving mental health, supporting healthy aging, and helping people receive care before conditions become emergencies.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Bring back small-town medicine by ensuring every Vermont community has free primary care providers by replacing fee-for-service primary care with direct public funding that gives doctors, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and mental health providers more time with patients and rewards preve…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Bring back small-town medicine by ensuring every Vermont community has free primary care providers by replacing fee-for-service primary care with direct public funding that gives doctors, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and mental health providers more time with patients and rewards prevention, continuity of care, and healthier communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

We will build on these successful models by ensuring every Vermont community has access to a locally based Community Health Team—including primary care providers, community nurses, mental health professionals, community health workers, care coordinators, and independent local pharmacies—working toge…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

We will build on these successful models by ensuring every Vermont community has access to a locally based Community Health Team—including primary care providers, community nurses, mental health professionals, community health workers, care coordinators, and independent local pharmacies—working together to keep people healthy before small problems become expensive crises.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

By investing in local food systems, we’ll make nutritious food more affordable and accessible, improve public health, and reduce diet-related disease by making healthy food the easy choice. We’ll strengthen our rural communities by creating good-paying jobs across the food economy, keeping more food…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

By investing in local food systems, we’ll make nutritious food more affordable and accessible, improve public health, and reduce diet-related disease by making healthy food the easy choice. We’ll strengthen our rural communities by creating good-paying jobs across the food economy, keeping more food dollars circulating locally, and ensuring family farms can thrive for generations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Instead of competing to attract investment from somewhere else, we can invest in the people, businesses, industries, and communities that already make Vermont strong. By helping Vermont businesses grow, connecting local producers with local buyers, expanding local ownership, and producing more of th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Instead of competing to attract investment from somewhere else, we can invest in the people, businesses, industries, and communities that already make Vermont strong. By helping Vermont businesses grow, connecting local producers with local buyers, expanding local ownership, and producing more of the food, energy, housing, healthcare, building materials, and other essential goods we need here at home, we can create an economy that’s more prosperous, more affordable, and far more resilient.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Healthcare costs

By rebuilding small-town medicine, expanding successful Community Nurse programs, and making primary and preventive care free for every Vermonter, we’ll create healthier communities, lower long-term healthcare costs, strengthen Vermont’s resilience, and restore the trusted local healthcare relations…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

By rebuilding small-town medicine, expanding successful Community Nurse programs, and making primary and preventive care free for every Vermonter, we’ll create healthier communities, lower long-term healthcare costs, strengthen Vermont’s resilience, and restore the trusted local healthcare relationships that have always been at the heart of our communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Invest upstream instead of paying for crises downstream by expanding preventive care, maternal health, mental healthcare, nutrition, chronic disease management, and early intervention—improving health while reducing costly emergency room visits, avoidable hospitalizations, and expensive specialist c…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Invest upstream instead of paying for crises downstream by expanding preventive care, maternal health, mental healthcare, nutrition, chronic disease management, and early intervention—improving health while reducing costly emergency room visits, avoidable hospitalizations, and expensive specialist care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Protect Vermonters from mass surveillance by prohibiting the sale of sensitive personal information, banning surveillance technologies such as Flock cameras, and preventing AI from being used to monitor lawful political activity, labor organizing, immigration enforcement, reproductive healthcare, or…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, technology, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Protect Vermonters from mass surveillance by prohibiting the sale of sensitive personal information, banning surveillance technologies such as Flock cameras, and preventing AI from being used to monitor lawful political activity, labor organizing, immigration enforcement, reproductive healthcare, or religious practice.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Produce more of what Vermont needs by investing in local food systems, community-owned renewable energy, housing construction, forest products, sustainable building materials, healthcare, childcare, manufacturing, repair industries, and other essential sectors that create good jobs while making Verm…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Produce more of what Vermont needs by investing in local food systems, community-owned renewable energy, housing construction, forest products, sustainable building materials, healthcare, childcare, manufacturing, repair industries, and other essential sectors that create good jobs while making Vermont more resilient, self-reliant, and less dependent on fragile national supply chains and corporate giants.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Support public-purpose innovation by partnering with Vermont colleges, universities, entrepreneurs, and mission-driven technology companies to develop open-source software, privacy-protecting technologies, cybersecurity, AI for healthcare and scientific research, agricultural innovation, accessibili…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, technology, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Support public-purpose innovation by partnering with Vermont colleges, universities, entrepreneurs, and mission-driven technology companies to develop open-source software, privacy-protecting technologies, cybersecurity, AI for healthcare and scientific research, agricultural innovation, accessibility tools, and other technologies that solve real problems while keeping knowledge, jobs, and innovation rooted in Vermont.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Build on Vermont’s community school approach by supporting schools to become locally designed hubs for education, healthcare, mental-health support, childcare, food access, adult learning, recreation, and community services. Each school will determine its own priorities through collaboration among s…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Build on Vermont’s community school approach by supporting schools to become locally designed hubs for education, healthcare, mental-health support, childcare, food access, adult learning, recreation, and community services. Each school will determine its own priorities through collaboration among students, families, educators, municipalities, nonprofits, and local residents.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Place community-school coordinators in participating schools to build partnerships, identify unmet needs, coordinate services, pursue outside funding, and connect families with assistance. This will ensure teachers are not expected to act simultaneously as educators, social workers, case managers, m…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Place community-school coordinators in participating schools to build partnerships, identify unmet needs, coordinate services, pursue outside funding, and connect families with assistance. This will ensure teachers are not expected to act simultaneously as educators, social workers, case managers, mental-health providers, and healthcare navigators.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

And by creating a universal system of publicly funded primary and preventive care, we’ll lay the foundation for a future where every Vermonter has access to comprehensive universal healthcare—building it step by step on a strong, affordable, community-based foundation.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

And by creating a universal system of publicly funded primary and preventive care, we’ll lay the foundation for a future where every Vermonter has access to comprehensive universal healthcare—building it step by step on a strong, affordable, community-based foundation.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Strengthen Vermont’s workforce and innovation economy by expanding apprenticeships, career and technical education, workforce partnerships, and research collaborations between Vermont colleges, universities, technical centers, unions, employers, entrepreneurs, and manufacturers—aligning public resea…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen Vermont’s workforce and innovation economy by expanding apprenticeships, career and technical education, workforce partnerships, and research collaborations between Vermont colleges, universities, technical centers, unions, employers, entrepreneurs, and manufacturers—aligning public research with Vermont’s greatest needs so innovations in areas like Lyme disease, climate resilience, sustainable agriculture, affordable housing, clean energy, and rural healthcare improve people’s lives while creating new Vermont businesses and good local jobs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Support healthy food as preventive healthcare by expanding Food is Medicine initiatives, strengthening connections between local farms, schools, hospitals, and community health centers, supporting regenerative agriculture, and reducing Vermonters’ exposure to harmful chemicals and contaminants where…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Support healthy food as preventive healthcare by expanding Food is Medicine initiatives, strengthening connections between local farms, schools, hospitals, and community health centers, supporting regenerative agriculture, and reducing Vermonters’ exposure to harmful chemicals and contaminants wherever Vermont has the authority to act.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Together, we can build a healthcare system where every Vermonter has a trusted healthcare team close to home and never has to choose between getting the care they need and paying the bills.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Together, we can build a healthcare system where every Vermonter has a trusted healthcare team close to home and never has to choose between getting the care they need and paying the bills.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Vermont Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 9 statements

John S. Rodgers

2 statements

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · VT

Health coverage

Too many Vermonters are being squeezed by rising property taxes, higher energy costs, increasing health insurance premiums, and the growing cost of everyday life. John is committed to fighting for lower costs by opposing unnecessary taxes, mandates, and government spending that place additional burd…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Too many Vermonters are being squeezed by rising property taxes, higher energy costs, increasing health insurance premiums, and the growing cost of everyday life. John is committed to fighting for lower costs by opposing unnecessary taxes, mandates, and government spending that place additional burdens on Vermont families, seniors, farmers, and small businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John S. Rodgers — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from John S. Rodgers
Care & public health

Having built a career through hard work and the trades himself, John has long been a strong advocate for career and technical education, apprenticeships, and workforce development programs that prepare Vermonters for rewarding careers in construction, manufacturing, healthcare, agriculture, and othe…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Having built a career through hard work and the trades himself, John has long been a strong advocate for career and technical education, apprenticeships, and workforce development programs that prepare Vermonters for rewarding careers in construction, manufacturing, healthcare, agriculture, and other essential industries.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John S. Rodgers — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Molly Gray

7 statements

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · VT

Health coverage

One of the biggest drivers of rising education costs is healthcare. Health insurance premiums for public school employees have increased by double digits in recent years, significantly raising school budgets and Vermonters’ property tax bills. Molly believes Vermont must confront these rising health…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

One of the biggest drivers of rising education costs is healthcare. Health insurance premiums for public school employees have increased by double digits in recent years, significantly raising school budgets and Vermonters’ property tax bills. Molly believes Vermont must confront these rising healthcare costs while protecting strong local schools and educational opportunities for students across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 6 more statements from Molly Gray
Care & public health

Grow a primary care workforce. Incentivizing physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals to practice primary care, especially in rural areas, by expanding loan forgiveness and scholarship opportunities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Grow a primary care workforce. Incentivizing physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals to practice primary care, especially in rural areas, by expanding loan forgiveness and scholarship opportunities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

Advance meaningful healthcare reforms that treat healthcare as a human right by prioritizing community-based preventative primary and mental health care for every Vermonter and incentivizing wellness and prevention over profit from illness.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Advance meaningful healthcare reforms that treat healthcare as a human right by prioritizing community-based preventative primary and mental health care for every Vermonter and incentivizing wellness and prevention over profit from illness.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

Support publicly-funded universal primary care for all Vermonters – regardless of age, income, or zip code. This will reduce or eliminate insurance premiums while increasing Vermonters’ access to preventative care – the cheapest and most effective way to keep Vermonters healthy, and decrease costly …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Support publicly-funded universal primary care for all Vermonters – regardless of age, income, or zip code. This will reduce or eliminate insurance premiums while increasing Vermonters’ access to preventative care – the cheapest and most effective way to keep Vermonters healthy, and decrease costly visits to hospital emergency rooms. Read Molly’s full proposal for Universal Primary Care here.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

Address inflated hospital administrative costsby aligning salaries for administration and management with regional peers, in turn finding savings in hospital budgets and decreasing insurance premiums without compromising patient care.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Address inflated hospital administrative costsby aligning salaries for administration and management with regional peers, in turn finding savings in hospital budgets and decreasing insurance premiums without compromising patient care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

Support policies that ensure our Vermont rural communities don’t just survive, but thrive — with equitable access to quality schools, hospitals, primary care, affordable housing, broadband, and other essential services.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Support policies that ensure our Vermont rural communities don’t just survive, but thrive — with equitable access to quality schools, hospitals, primary care, affordable housing, broadband, and other essential services.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

Support universal primary care for every Vermonter

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Support universal primary care for every Vermonter

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Vermont candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Vermont incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Vermont legislators and Vermont’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Vermont’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 4 Vermont incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Angela Arsenault

Vermont House of Representatives · D–VT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Angela Arsenault
Vermont Legislature · H.606

An act relating to firearms relinquishment and storage procedures

Jun 15, 2026 · Enacted · Act 134

Rep. Angela Arsenault · Sponsored / Rep. Martin LaLonde · Sponsored / Rep. Doug Bishop · Co-sponsored / Rep. R. Scott Campbell · Co-sponsored / Rep. Ela Chapin · Co-sponsored / Rep. Esme Cole · Co-sponsored / Rep. Karen Dolan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Golrang "Rey" Garofano · Co-sponsored / Rep. Leslie Goldman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Edye Graning · Co-sponsored / Rep. Troy Headrick · Co-sponsored / Rep. Rebecca Holcombe · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kathleen James · Co-sponsored / Rep. Emilie Krasnow · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kate McCann · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael Mrowicki · Co-sponsored / Rep. Herb Olson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Gayle Pezzo · Co-sponsored / Rep. Phil Pouech · Co-sponsored / Rep. Larry Satcowitz · Co-sponsored / Rep. Robin Scheu · Co-sponsored / Rep. Amy Sheldon · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trevor Squirrell · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mary-Katherine Stone · Co-sponsored / Rep. Chea Waters Evans · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.606 became Act 134 on June 15, 2026, effective July 1. For firearms surrendered under abuse-prevention or extreme-risk protection orders, it sets a court-approval process for third-party storage and requires the proposed holder to undergo a NICS background check, with the result provided to the court. This connection concerns custody safeguards for surrendered weapons, not a ban on all firearm possession.

Signed by the governor 2026-06-15, Act 134. The history entry date (2026-05-29) is distinct from the signing date recorded in its text.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality fact includes suicide, homicide and other intents. Safeguards for firearms surrendered under abuse-prevention or extreme-risk orders concern access to weapons in a subset of risk situations; they do not establish fewer firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Vermont evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The court may order an alternative relinquishment to a third party if after a hearing the court finds that the alternative relinquishment adequately protects the safety of the protected parties. […] (i) Firearms shall not be held by a third party unless approved by the court using the process set forth in this subdivision (2). […] (iii) To be considered as a third party eligible to hold surrendered firearms, the third party shall agree to undergo a background check through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) to verify that the person is legally permitted to have a firearm. The background check required by this subdivision (iii) shall be provided to the court.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Martin LaLonde

Vermont House of Representatives · D–VT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Martin LaLonde
Vermont Legislature · H.606

An act relating to firearms relinquishment and storage procedures

Jun 15, 2026 · Enacted · Act 134

Rep. Angela Arsenault · Sponsored / Rep. Martin LaLonde · Sponsored / Rep. Doug Bishop · Co-sponsored / Rep. R. Scott Campbell · Co-sponsored / Rep. Ela Chapin · Co-sponsored / Rep. Esme Cole · Co-sponsored / Rep. Karen Dolan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Golrang "Rey" Garofano · Co-sponsored / Rep. Leslie Goldman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Edye Graning · Co-sponsored / Rep. Troy Headrick · Co-sponsored / Rep. Rebecca Holcombe · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kathleen James · Co-sponsored / Rep. Emilie Krasnow · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kate McCann · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michael Mrowicki · Co-sponsored / Rep. Herb Olson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Gayle Pezzo · Co-sponsored / Rep. Phil Pouech · Co-sponsored / Rep. Larry Satcowitz · Co-sponsored / Rep. Robin Scheu · Co-sponsored / Rep. Amy Sheldon · Co-sponsored / Rep. Trevor Squirrell · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mary-Katherine Stone · Co-sponsored / Rep. Chea Waters Evans · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.606 became Act 134 on June 15, 2026, effective July 1. For firearms surrendered under abuse-prevention or extreme-risk protection orders, it sets a court-approval process for third-party storage and requires the proposed holder to undergo a NICS background check, with the result provided to the court. This connection concerns custody safeguards for surrendered weapons, not a ban on all firearm possession.

Signed by the governor 2026-06-15, Act 134. The history entry date (2026-05-29) is distinct from the signing date recorded in its text.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality fact includes suicide, homicide and other intents. Safeguards for firearms surrendered under abuse-prevention or extreme-risk orders concern access to weapons in a subset of risk situations; they do not establish fewer firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Vermont evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The court may order an alternative relinquishment to a third party if after a hearing the court finds that the alternative relinquishment adequately protects the safety of the protected parties. […] (i) Firearms shall not be held by a third party unless approved by the court using the process set forth in this subdivision (2). […] (iii) To be considered as a third party eligible to hold surrendered firearms, the third party shall agree to undergo a background check through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) to verify that the person is legally permitted to have a firearm. The background check required by this subdivision (iii) shall be provided to the court.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Ruth Hardy

Vermont Senate · D–VT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Ruth Hardy
Vermont Legislature · S.28

An act relating to access to certain legally protected health care services

May 13, 2025 · Enacted · Act 20

Sen. Ruth Hardy · Sponsored / Sen. Virginia "Ginny" Lyons · Sponsored / Sen. Alison Clarkson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Martine Larocque Gulick · Co-sponsored / Sen. Tanya Vyhovsky · Co-sponsored / Sen. Rebecca "Becca" White · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S.28 became Act 20 on May 13, 2025, effective on passage. Its reporting provisions retain the requirement to report therapeutic or induced abortions and expand the named reporting professionals beyond physicians. They strengthen confidentiality and shorten report retention from five years to two. This connection addresses abortion reporting, not every provision of the broader health-care law.

Signed by the governor 2025-05-13, Act 20. The history entry date (2025-05-14) is distinct from the signing date recorded in its text.

Why this record is included

The fact counts abortions performed in Vermont, including procedures for nonresidents. The reporting provision addresses the collection and retention of those statistical reports. It does not convert the occurrence count into a resident count or establish how many abortions occurred. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Vermont evidence context: Abortions performed in Vermont. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(a)(1) The following fetal deaths shall be reported by the hospital, licensed health care professional, or funeral director directly to the Commissioner within seven days after delivery on forms prescribed by the Department: […] (B) All therapeutic or induced abortions, as legally authorized to be performed, of any length gestation or weight shall be reported. […] (d) Reports made pursuant to this section are for statistical purposes only and are not public records. They shall be kept confidential; shall not be disclosed or discoverable in any civil, criminal, administrative, or other proceeding; and shall be destroyed after two years.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Virginia "Ginny" Lyons

Vermont Senate · D–VT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Virginia "Ginny" Lyons
Vermont Legislature · S.28

An act relating to access to certain legally protected health care services

May 13, 2025 · Enacted · Act 20

Sen. Ruth Hardy · Sponsored / Sen. Virginia "Ginny" Lyons · Sponsored / Sen. Alison Clarkson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Martine Larocque Gulick · Co-sponsored / Sen. Tanya Vyhovsky · Co-sponsored / Sen. Rebecca "Becca" White · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S.28 became Act 20 on May 13, 2025, effective on passage. Its reporting provisions retain the requirement to report therapeutic or induced abortions and expand the named reporting professionals beyond physicians. They strengthen confidentiality and shorten report retention from five years to two. This connection addresses abortion reporting, not every provision of the broader health-care law.

Signed by the governor 2025-05-13, Act 20. The history entry date (2025-05-14) is distinct from the signing date recorded in its text.

Why this record is included

The fact counts abortions performed in Vermont, including procedures for nonresidents. The reporting provision addresses the collection and retention of those statistical reports. It does not convert the occurrence count into a resident count or establish how many abortions occurred. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Vermont evidence context: Abortions performed in Vermont. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(a)(1) The following fetal deaths shall be reported by the hospital, licensed health care professional, or funeral director directly to the Commissioner within seven days after delivery on forms prescribed by the Department: […] (B) All therapeutic or induced abortions, as legally authorized to be performed, of any length gestation or weight shall be reported. […] (d) Reports made pursuant to this section are for statistical purposes only and are not public records. They shall be kept confidential; shall not be disclosed or discoverable in any civil, criminal, administrative, or other proceeding; and shall be destroyed after two years.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Vermont officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Vermont statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.