Utah · individual fact

Utah income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Utah’s tax structure.

Explore another state

Median household income$95.17K2020–2024 · #10 of 50 · highest first

Per-capita money income$40.87K2020–2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first

Real personal income per person$55.12K2024 · #39 of 50 · highest first

Utah over time

Explore Utah readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Utah officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Utah effect.

Show major events Only events with figuresExplore an event

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Utah change.

Show Utah actionsShow U.S. benchmark where published

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Utah · source units

UtahPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

84 of 84 reviewed Utah actions match · 54 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Utah · 2024: $55,116 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data

Utah Real personal income per person · source units
Period	Utah	Rank	U.S. benchmark
2024	$55,116	#39 of 50	$59,195
2023	$55,999	#30 of 50	$58,088
2022	$55,399	#29 of 50	$57,104
2021	$56,766	#31 of 50	$59,365
2020	$52,058	#41 of 50	$56,514
2019	$47,937	#43 of 50	$53,683
2018	$46,494	#42 of 50	$52,242
2017	$43,690	#47 of 50	$51,006
2016	$43,368	#46 of 50	$49,828
2015	$42,051	#47 of 50	$49,396
2014	$39,603	#50 of 50	$47,661

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis · BEA SARPI, line 2 ↗

How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Utah · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

MeasureComparison period

Utah · 2020–2024$95,166

Utah rank#10among all 50 states

U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Utah stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Inspect a stateGraph order

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · $95,1662020–2024 · Rank #10 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $94,392 – $95,940Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked

Table order

Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank	State	Value	Comparison notes
#1	Massachusetts	$103,960	90% CI: 103433–104487
#2	Maryland	$103,678	90% CI: 103081–104275
#3	New Jersey	$103,556	90% CI: 103043–104069
#4	Hawaii	$100,389	90% CI: 99268–101510
#5	California	$99,122	90% CI: 98812–99432
#6	New Hampshire	$99,031	90% CI: 97908–100154
#7	Washington	$98,141	90% CI: 97727–98555
#8	Connecticut	$95,781	90% CI: 95049–96513
#9	Colorado	$95,470	90% CI: 94892–96048
#10	Utah · your comparison	$95,166	90% CI: 94392–95940
#11	Virginia	$93,170	90% CI: 92712–93628
#12	Alaska	$92,788	90% CI: 91556–94020
#13	Minnesota	$89,062	90% CI: 88653–89471
#14	Rhode Island	$87,796	90% CI: 86587–89005
#15	New York	$85,974	90% CI: 85572–86376
#16	Delaware	$84,954	90% CI: 83703–86205
#17	Illinois	$83,390	90% CI: 83028–83752
#18	Oregon	$83,011	90% CI: 82438–83584
#19	Vermont	$81,203	90% CI: 79864–82542
#20	Arizona	$79,964	90% CI: 79557–80371
#21	Texas	$78,476	90% CI: 78213–78739
#22	Nevada	$78,260	90% CI: 77664–78856
#23	Pennsylvania	$77,971	90% CI: 77629–78313
#24	Idaho	$77,800	90% CI: 77057–78543
#25	Wisconsin	$77,485	90% CI: 77030–77940
#26	Georgia	$77,353	90% CI: 76946–77760
#27	North Dakota	$76,657	90% CI: 75494–77820
#28	Nebraska	$76,475	90% CI: 75842–77108
#29	Wyoming	$76,176	90% CI: 75008–77344
#30	South Dakota	$75,081	90% CI: 74193–75969
#31	Iowa	$75,059	90% CI: 74641–75477
#32	Maine	$74,733	90% CI: 73938–75528
#33	Florida	$74,568	90% CI: 74284–74852
#34	Kansas	$74,275	90% CI: 73800–74750
#35	Michigan	$72,875	90% CI: 72582–73168
#36	Montana	$72,509	90% CI: 71748–73270
#37	North Carolina	$72,388	90% CI: 72064–72712
#38	Indiana	$71,957	90% CI: 71605–72309
#39	Ohio	$71,389	90% CI: 71068–71710
#40	Missouri	$70,702	90% CI: 70377–71027
#41	Tennessee	$69,595	90% CI: 69166–70024
#42	South Carolina	$69,324	90% CI: 68754–69894
#43	Oklahoma	$65,039	90% CI: 64600–65478
#44	New Mexico	$64,059	90% CI: 63251–64867
#45	Alabama	$63,999	90% CI: 63600–64398
#46	Kentucky	$63,726	90% CI: 63297–64155
#47	Arkansas	$60,773	90% CI: 60306–61240
#48	Louisiana	$60,756	90% CI: 60348–61164
#49	West Virginia	$59,608	90% CI: 58917–60299
#50	Mississippi	$56,447	90% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

U.S. Census Bureau · 2020–2024 ACS five-year estimates ↗

Median household income

$95,1662020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Utah households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.

U.S. Census Bureau · QuickFacts: Utah ↗

Utah · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

MeasureComparison period

Utah · 2024$55,116

Utah rank#39among all 50 states

U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

UtahShow U.S. benchmark

2024 · Utah: $55,116 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison

View history and select a period

Utah Real personal income per person history
Period	Utah	Compare
2014	$39,603
2015	$42,051
2016	$43,368
2017	$43,690
2018	$46,494
2019	$47,937
2020	$52,058
2021	$56,766
2022	$55,399
2023	$55,999
2024	$55,116

Compare states on the graph

Inspect a stateGraph order

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · $55,1162024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked

Table order

Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank	State	Value	Comparison notes
#1	Wyoming	$75,501	—
#2	Connecticut	$74,254	—
#3	Massachusetts	$71,629	—
#4	South Dakota	$69,153	—
#5	Nebraska	$65,297	—
#6	North Dakota	$65,271	—
#7	Colorado	$65,223	—
#8	New Hampshire	$64,632	—
#9	Washington	$64,421	—
#10	New York	$64,153	—
#11	New Jersey	$63,142	—
#12	California	$63,028	—
#13	Minnesota	$62,039	—
#14	Virginia	$61,914	—
#15	Maryland	$61,111	—
#16	Illinois	$60,333	—
#17	Alaska	$60,272	—
#18	Iowa	$60,144	—
#19	Montana	$59,203	—
#20	Kansas	$59,172	—
#21	Vermont	$58,893	—
#22	Oklahoma	$58,692	—
#23	Pennsylvania	$58,620	—
#24	Tennessee	$58,582	—
#25	Wisconsin	$58,273	—
#26	Texas	$58,219	—
#27	Missouri	$57,850	—
#28	Maine	$57,480	—
#29	Florida	$57,131	—
#30	Louisiana	$56,789	—
#31	Nevada	$56,503	—
#32	North Carolina	$56,310	—
#33	Ohio	$56,232	—
#34	Rhode Island	$55,878	—
#35	Indiana	$55,562	—
#36	Oregon	$55,451	—
#37	Arkansas	$55,219	—
#38	Delaware	$55,185	—
#39	Utah · your comparison	$55,116	—
#40	Michigan	$53,569	—
#41	Georgia	$52,952	—
#42	Arizona	$52,890	—
#43	Idaho	$52,816	—
#44	South Carolina	$52,463	—
#45	Kentucky	$52,290	—
#46	Hawaii	$52,272	—
#47	Alabama	$52,216	—
#48	New Mexico	$51,121	—
#49	West Virginia	$50,051	—
#50	Mississippi	$48,465	—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis · BEA SARPI, line 2 ↗

Utah · state comparison

How Utah raises taxes

S.B. 60 reduced Utah's individual-income-tax rate from 4.5% to 4.45% beginning in 2026. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

MeasureComparison period

Utah · FY2024$5.72B

Utah rank#21among all 50 states

U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Inspect a stateGraph order

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · $5.72BFY2024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked

Table order

Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank	State	Value	Comparison notes
#1	California	$123.1B	—
#2	New York	$53.84B	—
#3	Illinois	$22.63B	—
#4	Massachusetts	$22.13B	—
#5	New Jersey	$18.88B	—
#6	Virginia	$17.64B	—
#7	Pennsylvania	$17.08B	—
#8	North Carolina	$16.66B	—
#9	Georgia	$16.02B	—
#10	Minnesota	$13.27B	—
#11	Michigan	$11.56B	—
#12	Maryland	$10.65B	—
#13	Connecticut	$10.03B	—
#14	Ohio	$10.02B	—
#15	Oregon	$9.54B	—
#16	Wisconsin	$9.49B	—
#17	Indiana	$8.1B	—
#18	Missouri	$7.75B	—
#19	Colorado	$7.52B	—
#20	South Carolina	$6.15B	—
#21	Utah · your comparison	$5.72B	—
#22	Alabama	$5.28B	—
#23	Kentucky	$5.02B	—
#24	Louisiana	$4.88B	—
#25	Arizona	$4.81B	—
#26	Oklahoma	$4.51B	—
#27	Kansas	$4.5B	—
#28	Iowa	$3.76B	—
#29	Hawaii	$3.28B	—
#30	Idaho	$2.89B	—
#31	Arkansas	$2.76B	—
#32	Delaware	$2.53B	—
#33	Nebraska	$2.48B	—
#34	Maine	$2.4B	—
#35	Mississippi	$2.33B	—
#36	West Virginia	$2.27B	—
#37	Montana	$2.25B	—
#38	New Mexico	$2.17B	—
#39	Rhode Island	$1.59B	—
#40	Vermont	$1.24B	—
#41	North Dakota	$356.48M	—
#42	Washington	$350.45M	—
#43	New Hampshire	$183.36M	—
#44	Tennessee	$2.12M	—
#45	Alaska	$0	—
#45	Florida	$0	—
#45	Nevada	$0	—
#45	South Dakota	$0	—
#45	Texas	$0	—
#45	Wyoming	$0	—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

U.S. Census Bureau · 2024 state and local finance public-use data · state-government level ↗

Individual income tax

4.45%

S.B. 60 reduced Utah's individual-income-tax rate from 4.5% to 4.45% beginning in 2026.

Utah Legislature, Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst · Budget of the State of Utah 2026 — Bills Impacting Revenue ↗

Sales and use tax

4.85% State + local

Utah's general State sales-and-use-tax component is 4.85%, with local-option and other jurisdictional components varying by address. Grocery food uses a separate 3% State rate.

Utah State Tax Commission · 2026 Sales and Use Tax Rates ↗

Corporate franchise and income tax

4.45%

S.B. 60 reduced Utah's corporate franchise-and-income-tax rate from 4.5% to 4.45% beginning in 2026; a corporate minimum tax can still apply.

Utah Legislature, Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst · Budget of the State of Utah 2026 — Bills Impacting Revenue ↗

Property tax

Local area rates

A property's final Utah rate is the combined area rate made up of the applicable local taxing-entity rates, so the rate varies by location and assessed value.

Utah State Tax Commission · Certified Property Tax Rates ↗

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Filing status

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rate	Taxable income in this band
10%	Up to $12,400
12%	Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%	Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%	Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%	Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%	Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%	Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax-share year

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns

Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group	Approximate AGI range	Share of income	Share of income tax	Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returns	Below $53,801	12.3%	3.3%	3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns	$53,801 to under $105,604	19.2%	10.4%	7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns	$105,604 to under $187,608	20.9%	15.8%	10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns	$187,608 to under $272,209	11.2%	11.2%	14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns	$272,209 to under $675,602	15.8%	20.9%	18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns	$675,602 and above	20.6%	38.4%	26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Corporate tax year

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns

Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group	Share of returns	Share of business receipts	Income tax after credits	Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,000	44.6%	0.1%	$5.93B	1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million	32.9%	0.6%	$2.31B	0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million	17.6%	2.9%	$8.78B	2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million	3.9%	5.6%	$21.87B	4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion	0.8%	10.9%	$40.78B	9.1%
$1 billion and above	0.2%	80.0%	$368.84B	82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Household tax year

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group	Individual income	Payroll	Corporate	Excise	Combined rate
Lowest fifth	−10.1%	9.5%	0.8%	1.3%	1.4%
Second fifth	−0.9%	8.8%	0.8%	0.8%	9.5%
Middle fifth	3.1%	8.8%	0.9%	0.6%	13.4%
Fourth fifth	6.8%	9.3%	1.0%	0.5%	17.6%
Highest fifth	16.6%	6.1%	2.9%	0.3%	25.9%
All households	10.6%	7.5%	2.1%	0.4%	20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Purchasing power range

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars

View data: Purchasing power

Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
Period	Per person
Jul 2026	52,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 2026	52,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 2026	52,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 2026	52,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 2026	52,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 2026	52,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 2026	52,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 2025	52,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 2025	52,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 2025	52,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 2025	52,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 2025	52,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 2025	52,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 2025	52,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 2025	52,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 2025	53,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 2025	52,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 2025	52,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 2025	52,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 2024	52,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 2024	52,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 2024	52,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 2024	52,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 2024	52,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 2024	52,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 2024	52,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 2024	52,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 2024	51,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 2024	51,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 2024	51,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 2024	51,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 2023	51,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 2023	51,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 2023	51,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 2023	51,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 2023	51,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 2023	51,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 2023	51,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 2023	51,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 2023	50,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 2023	50,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 2023	50,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 2023	50,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 2022	49,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 2022	49,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 2022	49,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 2022	49,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 2022	48,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 2022	48,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 2022	48,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 2022	48,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 2022	48,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 2022	48,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 2022	48,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 2022	48,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 2021	49,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 2021	50,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 2021	50,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 2021	50,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 2021	50,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 2021	50,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 2021	50,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 2021	50,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 2021	52,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 2021	61,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 2021	50,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 2021	54,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 2020	49,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 2020	49,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 2020	49,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 2020	50,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 2020	49,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 2020	51,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 2020	51,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 2020	51,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 2020	54,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 2020	47,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 2020	47,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 2020	47,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Income and benefits year

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group	Before	+ Benefits	− Taxes	After
Lowest fifth	$26,200	$19,000	$400	$44,800
Second fifth	$59,100	$9,600	$5,600	$63,100
Middle fifth	$94,000	$5,600	$12,600	$87,000
Fourth fifth	$143,100	$3,000	$25,100	$121,100
Highest fifth	$412,600	$1,700	$106,700	$307,600
All households	$143,000	$7,900	$29,400	$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Credit estimate yearCredit measure

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group	Fewer people below the threshold	90% margin of error
All ages	6,768,000	±462,000
Under 18	3,704,000	±263,000
Ages 18–64	2,985,000	±224,000
Ages 65+	79,000	±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Utah income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Utah ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

Utah officeholders

Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.

84 of 84 reviewed Utah actions · newest first

Jul 21, 2026 · HR 8347 · RURAL Healthcare Act · In Congress

U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · HR 8347

RURAL Healthcare Act

Jul 21, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Burgess Owens · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Classifies qualifying temporary locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors under federal wage-and-hour and labor-relations law, subject to the bill’s contract and duration conditions.

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Classification of qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors under Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and National Labor Relations Act (a)In generalFor the purposes of the following Federal laws, an individual who is a qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner shall not be considered an employee of the entity on behalf of which the individual furnishes physician or advanced care practitioner services on a temporary basis, whether or not provided as a substitute for another provider: (1)The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). (2)The National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). (b)Qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner definedIn this section, the term qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner means an individual who— (1)provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services, including for workforce coverage, scheduling flexibility, or episodic staffing needs— (A)for a period of not more than one continuous year at a single site of service; and (B)pursuant to a written contract providing that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services; and (2)is— (A)a physician, as defined in— (i)section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)); or (ii)section 8101(2) of title 5, United States Code; or (B)a nurse practitioner, physician’s assistant, or certified registered nurse anesthetist.

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Burgess Owens’s profile ↗

Inspect this action on the timeline ↑

Apr 30, 2026 · S 4477 · Davis-Bacon Repeal Act · In Congress

U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · S 4477

Davis-Bacon Repeal Act

Apr 30, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Mike Lee · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Repeals federal Davis-Bacon prevailing-wage requirements while preserving the bill’s exception for specified existing contracts and outstanding invitations for bids.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Repeal of Davis-Bacon wage requirements(a)In generalSubchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, is repealed.(b)ReferenceAny reference in any law or a requirement under subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, shall be null and void. 3.Effective date and limitationSection 2, and the amendment made by such section, shall take effect 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act but shall not affect any contract that is—(1)in existence on the date that is 30 days after such date of enactment; or(2)made pursuant to an invitation for bids outstanding on the date that is 30 days after such date of enactment.

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Sen. Mike Lee’s profile ↗

Inspect this action on the timeline ↑

Apr 14, 2026 · HR 8272 · To classify qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the National Labor Relations Act. · In Congress

U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · HR 8272

To classify qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the National Labor Relations Act.

Apr 14, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Burgess Owens · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1.Classification of qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors under Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and National Labor Relations Act (a)In generalFor the purposes of the following Federal laws, an individual who is a qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner shall not be considered an employee of the entity on behalf of which the individual furnishes physician or advanced care practitioner services on a temporary basis, whether or not provided as a substitute for another provider: (1)The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). (2)The National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). (b)Qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner definedIn this section, the term qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner means an individual who— (1)provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services, including for workforce coverage, scheduling flexibility, or episodic staffing needs— (A)for a period of not more than one continuous year at a single site of service; and (B)pursuant to a written contract providing that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services; and (2)is— (A)a physician, as defined in— (i)section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)); or (ii)section 8101(2) of title 5, United States Code; or (B)a nurse practitioner, physician’s assistant, or certified registered nurse anesthetist.

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Burgess Owens’s profile ↗

Inspect this action on the timeline ↑

Apr 6, 2026 · HR 8204 · Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2026 · In Congress

U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · HR 8204

Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2026

Apr 6, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Celeste Maloy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Directs creation of a western refined-fuel reserve with a minimum gasoline capacity of five million barrels and emergency drawdown authority. Utah is one of the eligible western states.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Rocky Mountain regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming. Utah policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Utah statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

164.Western Refined Fuel Storage Reserve (a)DefinitionsIn this section: (1)Refined Fuel Storage ReserveThe term Refined Fuel Storage Reserve means a storage facility that— (A)is a salt cavern formation; and (B)is capable of storing refined petroleum products. (2)Refined petroleum productThe term refined petroleum product means gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. (3)Western StateThe term Western State means the States of Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington. (b)Establishment (1)In generalNot later than 6 months after the date of enactment of the Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2026, the Secretary shall establish a Refined Fuel Storage Reserve for the storage of refined petroleum products as part of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, pursuant to— (A)the authority of the Secretary under section 159(f) to address energy supply and transportation vulnerabilities in Western States, in accordance with Executive Order 14156 (90 Fed. Reg. 8433; relating to declaring a national energy emergency); and (B)this Act. (2)Requirements (A)Identification and selectionIn carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— (i)identify existing or potential storage locations in Western States suitable to establish a Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, taking into account— (I)the proximity of existing distribution systems; (II)areas of the United States— (aa)most dependent on imported petroleum products; and (bb)areas of the United States most likely to experience shortages of refined petroleum products; (III)the capability for expeditious distribution of refined petroleum products from the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve to areas of the United States described in subclause (II); and (IV)the cost of establishing the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve— (aa)in the applicable Western State; and (bb)at the applicable storage location; and (ii)select 1 storage location. (B)Existing locationsIn carrying out subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable— (i)identify locations suitable for the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve in Western States; and (ii)enter into a contractual arrangement with a public or private entity for the use and operation of a public or private storage location. (c)Fill and maintenance (1)RequirementsDuring the 5 fiscal years following the date of establishment of the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary shall, in accordance with paragraph (2), fill and maintain the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve at not less than 75 percent of the minimum capacity for each refined petroleum product on an adjusted annual basis using— (A)amounts appropriated by Congress for acquisition, by purchase, of petroleum products for storage in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve; and (B)revenues from emergency or test sales carried out pursuant to section 161. (2)Minimum capacityThe minimum capacity of the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve is— (A)5,000,000 barrels of gasoline; (B)3,000,000 barrels of diesel; and (C)2,000,000 barrels of jet fuel. (d)DrawdownThe Secretary may withdraw refined petroleum products stored in the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve to respond to emergencies, supply disruptions, or any other circumstances consistent with the intent of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve or the needs of Western States. (e)State and local government storageThe Secretary shall, as the Secretary determines appropriate, pursue agreements with applicable Western State governments and local governments for storage of non-Federal petroleum products within the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve. (f)ReportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2026, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the establishment and operations of the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, which shall include— (1)an evaluation of— (A)the mechanisms used to carry out the requirements of this section; and (B)other potential mechanisms that could be used in the future to carry out the requirements of this section; (2)the process for purchase or leasing of storage facilities required for the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, as applicable; and (3)recommendations for future storage of refined petroleum products in the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, including any administrative actions and legislation necessary to implement the recommendations, as the Secretary determines appropriate..

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Celeste Maloy’s profile ↗

Inspect this action on the timeline ↑

Mar 26, 2026 · SB 8 · State Agency and Higher Education Compensation Appropriations · Signed

Governor · SB 8

State Agency and Higher Education Compensation Appropriations

Mar 26, 2026 · Signed

Gov. Spencer Cox · Signed

FactVote reviewed summary

Spencer Cox signed SB 8. Provides funding for a 2.5% labor market increase for state employees and higher education employees; provides funding equivalent to a 2.5% labor market increase for employees of the judicial branch and constitutional offices; provides funding for step and lane increases for employees of the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind.

Governor Signed. The connection uses the official active enrolled-version highlights; implementation and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

provides funding for a 2.5% labor market increase for state employees and higher education employees; provides funding equivalent to a 2.5% labor market increase for employees of the judicial branch and constitutional offices; provides funding for step and lane increases for employees of the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind; and

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Gov. Spencer Cox’s profile ↗

Inspect this action on the timeline ↑

Mar 26, 2026 · SB 8 · State Agency and Higher Education Compensation Appropriations · Enacted

Utah Legislature · SB 8

State Agency and Higher Education Compensation Appropriations

Mar 26, 2026 · Enacted

Sen. Scott D. Sandall · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Provides funding for a 2.5% labor market increase for state employees and higher education employees; provides funding equivalent to a 2.5% labor market increase for employees of the judicial branch and constitutional offices; provides funding for step and lane increases for employees of the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

provides funding for a 2.5% labor market increase for state employees and higher education employees; provides funding equivalent to a 2.5% labor market increase for employees of the judicial branch and constitutional offices; provides funding for step and lane increases for employees of the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind; and

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Sen. Scott D. Sandall’s profile ↗

Inspect this action on the timeline ↑

How Utah action records are selected

Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Utah officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 6, 2026.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Utah candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

RaceConnection to this factFind a candidate or statement

25 statements from 12 candidates

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

4 candidates with matching statements · 9 statements

Ben McAdams

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

Groceries: The cost of everyday essentials keeps climbing while big corporations rake in record profits. I’ll work to lower food costs by opposing tariffs and tax policies that raise prices for consumers and hurt working families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Groceries: The cost of everyday essentials keeps climbing while big corporations rake in record profits. I’ll work to lower food costs by opposing tariffs and tax policies that raise prices for consumers and hurt working families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ben McAdams — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Original source ↗

View 1 more statement from Ben McAdams

Taxes & tax policy

Hard-working people should be able to afford the basics—housing, health care, groceries, and a secure retirement. Too many are falling behind. I’m focused on tackling the affordability crisis by standing against Trump’s tariffs that are driving up the cost of groceries and everyday items, by expandi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Hard-working people should be able to afford the basics—housing, health care, groceries, and a secure retirement. Too many are falling behind. I’m focused on tackling the affordability crisis by standing against Trump’s tariffs that are driving up the cost of groceries and everyday items, by expanding access to housing that’s affordable, lowering health care costs, strengthening retirement security, and pushing back on economic policies that reward corporations while driving up prices for everyone else. Donald Trump’s tax giveaways to the wealthy have made the rich richer while working families struggle. I will fight for an economy that helps Utah’s working people thrive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ben McAdams — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

Elias Henry Montgomery

2 statements

Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 1 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

Deregulate and Unshackle Personal Labor: Shift marketplace rules away from the regulatory penalty of direct taxation on personal work. Decentralize tax collection away from direct income tax so that lower income individuals and families are more capable to provide cost-of-living expenses. Rather tha…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Deregulate and Unshackle Personal Labor: Shift marketplace rules away from the regulatory penalty of direct taxation on personal work. Decentralize tax collection away from direct income tax so that lower income individuals and families are more capable to provide cost-of-living expenses. Rather than routing local wealth through a bloated government spending bureau, this model keeps capital in the private economy where it acts as a permanent, non-inflationary buffer for everyday citizens.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Elias Henry Montgomery — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Original source ↗

View 1 more statement from Elias Henry Montgomery

Taxes & tax policy

Shifting tax collection entirely closer to home over a strict, phased horizon, anchoring federal contributions strictly to state economic capacity, and establishing objective fiscal relief valves to shield local commerce from emergency economic shocks. Your tax dollars are a sacred trust. The law mu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Shifting tax collection entirely closer to home over a strict, phased horizon, anchoring federal contributions strictly to state economic capacity, and establishing objective fiscal relief valves to shield local commerce from emergency economic shocks. Your tax dollars are a sacred trust. The law must act as an objective, consistent referee—eliminating direct federal extraction from personal individual labor while realigning state-level revenue collection with proportional platform usage and diversified consumption.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Elias Henry Montgomery — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

Jesse West

4 statements

Libertarian · U.S. House District 1 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

•End corporate subsidies and industry-specific tax breaks

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

•End corporate subsidies and industry-specific tax breaks

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jesse West — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Original source ↗

View 3 more statements from Jesse West

Taxes & tax policy

Your health savings should be yours. Money you own and control, that follows you from job to job and state to state, with the same tax break your employer already gets for buying your coverage. Not an account the government fills and runs for you. Your money. Your doctor. Your choices. No bureaucrat…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Your health savings should be yours. Money you own and control, that follows you from job to job and state to state, with the same tax break your employer already gets for buying your coverage. Not an account the government fills and runs for you. Your money. Your doctor. Your choices. No bureaucrat, public or private, deciding what you deserve.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jesse West — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Original source ↗

Taxes & tax policy

•Expand tax-free Health Savings Accounts and give individuals the same tax break employers get, so your coverage isn't chained to your job

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

•Expand tax-free Health Savings Accounts and give individuals the same tax break employers get, so your coverage isn't chained to your job

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jesse West — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Original source ↗

Taxes & tax policy

•Build one fair tax system that everyone pays into, native-born and newcomer alike.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

•Build one fair tax system that everyone pays into, native-born and newcomer alike.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jesse West — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

Riley Owen

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

Riley will advocate for expanded tax credits to businesses offering 6 weeks of Paid Maternity Leave.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Riley will advocate for expanded tax credits to businesses offering 6 weeks of Paid Maternity Leave.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Riley Owen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Blake D. Moore

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

Advanced Family and Small-Business Tax Changes

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Congressional Record

Candidate campaign source

Advanced Family and Small-Business Tax Changes

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Blake D. Moore — Part 63 source ↗

Original source ↗

View 1 more statement from Blake D. Moore

Taxes & tax policy

Enacted Hazardous-Duty Tax Relief for Servicemembers

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Congressional Record

Candidate campaign source

Enacted Hazardous-Duty Tax Relief for Servicemembers

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Blake D. Moore — Part 63 source ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

Carlton E. Bowen

1 statement

Independent American · U.S. House District 2 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

Contributions are not tax deductible.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Key Issues

Candidate campaign source

Contributions are not tax deductible.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Carlton E. Bowen — campaign source ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

Peter Crosby

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

Close these tax loopholes, so that if AI deployment significantly displaces Americans and their families from the workforce, we have the resources necessary to support them while they transition.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity

Candidate campaign source

Close these tax loopholes, so that if AI deployment significantly displaces Americans and their families from the workforce, we have the resources necessary to support them while they transition.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Peter Crosby — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Original source ↗

View 2 more statements from Peter Crosby

Income & wages

Establish a realistic living wage

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Establish a realistic living wage

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Peter Crosby — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Original source ↗

Taxes & tax policy

Rewrite the current tax code so that large tech companies pay their fair share of taxes to support our government and communities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Rewrite the current tax code so that large tech companies pay their fair share of taxes to support our government and communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Peter Crosby — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

4 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements

Adonis Hooslyn

1 statement

Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 3 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

Increase taxes for billionaires to ensure they pay their fair share toward our national prosperity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Increase taxes for billionaires to ensure they pay their fair share toward our national prosperity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 20, 2026

Adonis Hooslyn — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

Ayden Scott

1 statement

Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 3 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

Inflation is a tax on working families, and it's caused by government overspending and artificial restrictions on American production. I will oppose reckless federal spending and push for a balanced budget — but the fastest way to bring prices down is to increase supply. When we unleash American ene…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, public lands, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Inflation is a tax on working families, and it's caused by government overspending and artificial restrictions on American production. I will oppose reckless federal spending and push for a balanced budget — but the fastest way to bring prices down is to increase supply. When we unleash American energy production, reduce barriers for manufacturers, and get out of the way of farmers and small producers, we create more of everything — and more supply means lower prices across the board for every Utah family. The federal government didn't build this economy, the American worker did. My job in Congress is to make sure Washington stops making their job harder.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ayden Scott — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

Kent S. Udell

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · UT

Income & wages

While many of us who have owned homes for decades are not negatively affected by rising housing costs, our younger generation finds that home ownership is not affordable without high wages. I support initiatives that focus on building starter homes in communities with access to family-friendly resou…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

While many of us who have owned homes for decades are not negatively affected by rising housing costs, our younger generation finds that home ownership is not affordable without high wages. I support initiatives that focus on building starter homes in communities with access to family-friendly resources such as good schools, parks and churches.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kent S. Udell — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

Michael R. Stoddard

5 statements

Libertarian · U.S. House District 3 · UT

Taxes & tax policy

What Washington sells you as “health insurance” isn’t insurance at all — it’s prepaid medical care run through the most expensive billing department ever assembled, and chained to your job by a tax trick from 1943. I’ll unchain coverage from employment, re-legalize real catastrophic insurance for th…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

What Washington sells you as “health insurance” isn’t insurance at all — it’s prepaid medical care run through the most expensive billing department ever assembled, and chained to your job by a tax trick from 1943. I’ll unchain coverage from employment, re-legalize real catastrophic insurance for the rare disaster, restore honest up-front prices, and fund the genuinely uninsurable in the daylight instead of hiding them inside everyone’s premium.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael R. Stoddard — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Original source ↗

View 4 more statements from Michael R. Stoddard

Taxes & tax policy

Inflation is a hidden tax no one voted for — the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value since the Federal Reserve was created in 1913. I'll work to end the federal monopoly on money and repeal the legal-tender coercion that forces Americans to save in a currency designed to lose value.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Inflation is a hidden tax no one voted for — the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value since the Federal Reserve was created in 1913. I'll work to end the federal monopoly on money and repeal the legal-tender coercion that forces Americans to save in a currency designed to lose value.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael R. Stoddard — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Original source ↗

Taxes & tax policy

Washington debases the dollar, then taxes the inflation it manufactured as if it were profit — and since 1982 it has taxed your “gains” before returning a dime of your own principal. These are two takings, and one principle ends them both: tax profit, never debasement. I'll work to index savings and…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Washington debases the dollar, then taxes the inflation it manufactured as if it were profit — and since 1982 it has taxed your “gains” before returning a dime of your own principal. These are two takings, and one principle ends them both: tax profit, never debasement. I'll work to index savings and investment to the dollar's decline, count the saver's own money first, and give every family a simple after-tax account with no warden at the door.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael R. Stoddard — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Original source ↗

Taxes & tax policy

Create the Make Americans Wealthy Again account: after-tax dollars, up to $10,000 a year per person (indexed from enactment), open to every American from birth — no income tests, no penalties, no required distributions.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Create the Make Americans Wealthy Again account: after-tax dollars, up to $10,000 a year per person (indexed from enactment), open to every American from birth — no income tests, no penalties, no required distributions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael R. Stoddard — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Original source ↗

Taxes & tax policy

Unchain your coverage from your job — end the 1943 tax trick by equalizing the tax treatment of health dollars, so the cash you spend on your own plan, your own doctor, and your own Health Savings Account is as tax-free as your employer's premium.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Unchain your coverage from your job — end the 1943 tax trick by equalizing the tax treatment of health dollars, so the cash you spend on your own plan, your own doctor, and your own Health Savings Account is as tax-free as your employer's premium.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael R. Stoddard — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Original source ↗

Candidate profile →

Race groups · Page 1 of 2

How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Utah candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Utah incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Utah legislators and Utah’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Utah’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

Government bodyProposal statusFind a sponsor or proposalOrder incumbents

63 matching sponsorships or proposals · 35 Utah incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Ariel Defay

Utah House of Representatives, District 15 · R–UT

1 proposal

View proposals from Rep. Ariel Defay

Utah Legislature · HB 329

State Employee Maternity and Leave Amendments

Mar 24, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Ariel Defay · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Removes foster placement as an event making a state employee eligible for paid parental leave and creates a separate foster leave category with a four-week paid-leave duration; allows two state employees who jointly adopt or foster a child to share a single paid leave period rather than each receiving a separate leave entitlement.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

removes foster placement as an event making a state employee eligible for paid parental leave and creates a separate foster leave category with a four-week paid-leave duration; allows two state employees who jointly adopt or foster a child to share a single paid leave period rather than each receiving a separate leave entitlement;

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Ariel Defay’s profile ↗

Rep. Ashlee Matthews

Utah House of Representatives, District 37 · D–UT

2 proposals

View proposals from Rep. Ashlee Matthews

Utah Legislature · HB 533

State Pay Plan Amendments

Mar 3, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Ashlee Matthews · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Establish specialized state pay plans for transportation technicians in the Department of Transportation that include certain information about salary range, qualifications, training, performance evaluation, and promotion; include recommendations on funding and salary increases for transportation technicians in the division director's annual compensation plan to the governor.

House/ filed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

establish specialized state pay plans for transportation technicians in the Department of Transportation that include certain information about salary range, qualifications, training, performance evaluation, and promotion; and include recommendations on funding and salary increases for transportation technicians in the division director's annual compensation plan to the governor.

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Ashlee Matthews’s profile ↗

Utah Legislature · HB 361

Minimum Wage Modifications

Mar 5, 2021 · Did not pass

Rep. Ashlee Matthews · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Modifies minimum wage for minors; adjusts the minimum wage in the state.

House/ filed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

modifies minimum wage for minors; adjusts the minimum wage in the state;

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Ashlee Matthews’s profile ↗

Rep. Blake D. Moore

U.S. House of Representatives, Utah District 1 · R–UT

1 proposal

View proposals from Rep. Blake D. Moore

U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · HR 308

Low Income Housing for Defense Communities Act

Jan 9, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Blake D. Moore · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Excludes military basic housing allowances from specified affordable-rental eligibility calculations and expands the low-income housing credit for buildings near qualifying large military installations.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Utah’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Tax incentives for rental housing for members of the Armed Forces(a)Military basic housing allowance not taken into account in applying certain income restrictions on residential rental projects(1)Low-income housing tax creditSection 42(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(10)Income determined without regard to military basic housing allowancePayments under section 403 of title 37, United States Code, as a basic pay allowance for housing shall not be taken into account in determining income for purposes of this section..(2)Tax-exempt bonds for qualified residential rental projects(A)In generalSection 142(d)(2)(B) of such Code, as amended by subparagraph (B), is amended by inserting after clause (i) the following new clause:(ii)Income determined without regard to military basis housing allowancePayments under section 403 of title 37, United States Code, as a basic pay allowance for housing shall not be taken into account in determining income for purposes of clause (i). .(B)Repeal of deadwoodSection 142(d)(2)(B) of such Code is amended by striking clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv).(3)Effective dateThe amendments made by this subsection shall apply to determinations made after the date of the enactment of this Act.(b)Increase in low-Income housing credit for buildings near certain large military installation(1)In generalSection 42(d)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new clause:(vi)Buildings near certain large military installation(I)In generalAny building which is located within 15 miles of a large military installation shall be treated as located in a difficult development area which is designated for purposes of this subparagraph.(II)Large military installationFor purposes of this clause, the term large military installation means any military installation with a total plant replacement value (as determined by the Secretary of the Defense) in excess of $2,833,000,000..(2)Effective dateThe amendment made by this subsection shall apply to buildings placed in service after the date of the enactment of this Act.(3)No requirement that buildings be occupied solely by members of the Armed ForcesNothing in the amendment made by this subsection shall be applied or interpreted to require that buildings described in section 42(d)(5)(B)(vi) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as added by this section) be occupied solely by members of the Armed Forces.

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Blake D. Moore’s profile ↗

Rep. Bridger Bolinder

Utah House of Representatives, District 29 · R–UT

1 proposal

View proposals from Rep. Bridger Bolinder

Utah Legislature · HB 456

Transient Room Tax Amendments

Mar 25, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Bridger Bolinder · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Repeals the sunset date on the Volunteer Emergency Medical Service Personnel Health Insurance Program.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

repeals the sunset date on the Volunteer Emergency Medical Service Personnel Health Insurance Program; and

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Bridger Bolinder’s profile ↗

Rep. Burgess Owens

U.S. House of Representatives, Utah District 4 · R–UT

2 proposals

View proposals from Rep. Burgess Owens

U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · HR 8347

RURAL Healthcare Act

Jul 21, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Burgess Owens · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Classification of qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors under Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and National Labor Relations Act (a)In generalFor the purposes of the following Federal laws, an individual who is a qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner shall not be considered an employee of the entity on behalf of which the individual furnishes physician or advanced care practitioner services on a temporary basis, whether or not provided as a substitute for another provider: (1)The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). (2)The National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). (b)Qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner definedIn this section, the term qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner means an individual who— (1)provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services, including for workforce coverage, scheduling flexibility, or episodic staffing needs— (A)for a period of not more than one continuous year at a single site of service; and (B)pursuant to a written contract providing that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services; and (2)is— (A)a physician, as defined in— (i)section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)); or (ii)section 8101(2) of title 5, United States Code; or (B)a nurse practitioner, physician’s assistant, or certified registered nurse anesthetist.

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Burgess Owens’s profile ↗

U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · HR 8272

To classify qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the National Labor Relations Act.

Apr 14, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Burgess Owens · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1.Classification of qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors under Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and National Labor Relations Act (a)In generalFor the purposes of the following Federal laws, an individual who is a qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner shall not be considered an employee of the entity on behalf of which the individual furnishes physician or advanced care practitioner services on a temporary basis, whether or not provided as a substitute for another provider: (1)The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). (2)The National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). (b)Qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner definedIn this section, the term qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner means an individual who— (1)provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services, including for workforce coverage, scheduling flexibility, or episodic staffing needs— (A)for a period of not more than one continuous year at a single site of service; and (B)pursuant to a written contract providing that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services; and (2)is— (A)a physician, as defined in— (i)section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)); or (ii)section 8101(2) of title 5, United States Code; or (B)a nurse practitioner, physician’s assistant, or certified registered nurse anesthetist.

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Burgess Owens’s profile ↗

Rep. Calvin Roberts

Utah House of Representatives, District 46 · R–UT

1 proposal

View proposals from Rep. Calvin Roberts

Utah Legislature · HB 575

Fuel Tax and Supply Amendments

Mar 23, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Calvin Roberts · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Enacts provisions related to permitting and right-of-way coordination for certain oil and gas infrastructure; reduces the rate of the motor fuel tax; requires refineries to report to the Office of Energy Development regarding production; provides guidelines regarding information and data reported by refineries to the Office of Energy Development.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Retained Utah evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

enacts provisions related to permitting and right-of-way coordination for certain oil and gas infrastructure; reduces the rate of the motor fuel tax; requires refineries to report to the Office of Energy Development regarding production; provides guidelines regarding information and data reported by refineries to the Office of Energy Development;

Review official supporting evidence ↗

Official record ↗Rep. Calvin Roberts’s profile ↗

What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Utah officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Utah statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 6, 2026.

Sources & methods

Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.

#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.

Utah snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Utah, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.

Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.

← All Utah individual facts

Median household income i

Compare states on the graph

Median household income

Real personal income per person i

Compare states on the graph

Personal income-tax collections i

Compare states on the graph

Individual income tax

Sales and use tax

Corporate franchise and income tax

Property tax

How federal income taxes work

Base standard deduction i

Marginal versus effective rate i

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Who pays corporate income taxes?

The broader federal tax burden

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real income per person i

Change from prior month i

Change from a year earlier i

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Tax credits and measured poverty

Understanding Utah income

Median, average and per person

Income, taxes and living costs

Annual and five-year estimates

Rankings and uncertainty

RURAL Healthcare Act

FactVote reviewed summary

Davis-Bacon Repeal Act

FactVote reviewed summary

To classify qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the National Labor Relations Act.

FactVote reviewed summary

Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2026

FactVote reviewed summary

State Agency and Higher Education Compensation Appropriations

FactVote reviewed summary

State Agency and Higher Education Compensation Appropriations

FactVote reviewed summary

What candidates are saying

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

Rep. Ariel Defay

State Employee Maternity and Leave Amendments

FactVote reviewed summary

Rep. Ashlee Matthews

State Pay Plan Amendments

FactVote reviewed summary

Minimum Wage Modifications

FactVote reviewed summary

Rep. Blake D. Moore

Low Income Housing for Defense Communities Act

FactVote reviewed summary

Rep. Bridger Bolinder

Transient Room Tax Amendments

FactVote reviewed summary

Rep. Burgess Owens

RURAL Healthcare Act

FactVote reviewed summary

To classify qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the National Labor Relations Act.

FactVote reviewed summary

Rep. Calvin Roberts

Fuel Tax and Supply Amendments

FactVote reviewed summary

Sources & methods

Median household income

Real personal income per person

Personal income-tax collections

Base standard deduction

Marginal versus effective rate

Real income per person

Change from prior month

Change from a year earlier