New York state-government finances, comparable debt and interest figures, and the enacted budget.
The national companion measures federal finances. Here the unit is New York state government. Federal debt is not allocated to New York; a state budget is not the federal budget.
Explore New York readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New York officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New York effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New York change.
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
No comparable time series is retained for this topic. The chart shows events and reviewed actions; current state comparisons appear below.
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
72 of 72 reviewed New York actions match · 39 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Compare state-government balances and interest expenditure from the same Census fiscal-year survey.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Long-term debt outstanding plus short-term debt outstanding at fiscal year end.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Excludes local-government debt. Dollar ranks describe scale, not credit quality.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New York stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New York has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $166.39B | — |
| #2 | New York · your comparison | $120.59B | — |
| #3 | Texas | $70.05B | — |
| #4 | Massachusetts | $65.87B | — |
| #5 | New Jersey | $57.23B | — |
| #6 | Pennsylvania | $48.67B | — |
| #7 | Illinois | $43.38B | — |
| #8 | Virginia | $33.73B | — |
| #9 | Connecticut | $33.27B | — |
| #10 | Ohio | $32.29B | — |
| #11 | Washington | $30.62B | — |
| #12 | Maryland | $25.9B | — |
| #13 | Michigan | $25.02B | — |
| #14 | Colorado | $23.57B | — |
| #15 | Wisconsin | $22.79B | — |
| #16 | Florida | $20.14B | — |
| #17 | Minnesota | $17.03B | — |
| #18 | Oregon | $16.91B | — |
| #19 | Louisiana | $16.09B | — |
| #20 | South Carolina | $15.36B | — |
| #21 | West Virginia | $15.08B | — |
| #22 | Georgia | $14.05B | — |
| #23 | North Carolina | $13.13B | — |
| #24 | Hawaii | $11.72B | — |
| #25 | Rhode Island | $11.41B | — |
| #26 | Alabama | $10.99B | — |
| #27 | Oklahoma | $10.15B | — |
| #28 | Kentucky | $10.08B | — |
| #29 | Tennessee | $9.03B | — |
| #30 | Indiana | $8.52B | — |
| #31 | Iowa | $8.06B | — |
| #32 | Arkansas | $8.05B | — |
| #33 | Mississippi | $7.72B | — |
| #34 | New Hampshire | $7.58B | — |
| #35 | Kansas | $7.16B | — |
| #36 | New Mexico | $7.12B | — |
| #37 | Missouri | $6.99B | — |
| #38 | Arizona | $6.88B | — |
| #39 | Alaska | $5.72B | — |
| #40 | Utah | $5.55B | — |
| #41 | Maine | $5.3B | — |
| #42 | North Dakota | $4.89B | — |
| #43 | South Dakota | $4.67B | — |
| #44 | Delaware | $3.69B | — |
| #45 | Nebraska | $3.39B | — |
| #46 | Nevada | $2.89B | — |
| #47 | Montana | $2.76B | — |
| #48 | Vermont | $2.67B | — |
| #49 | Wyoming | $1.26B | — |
| #50 | Idaho | $728.59M | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
All measures use Census state-government records for FY2024. Categories describe collections; they do not rank statutory tax rates.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Census category T09.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New York stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New York has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Texas | $54.35B | — |
| #2 | California | $53.33B | — |
| #3 | Florida | $40.09B | — |
| #4 | Washington | $22.81B | — |
| #5 | New York · your comparison | $19.99B | — |
| #6 | Ohio | $16.33B | — |
| #7 | Illinois | $16.05B | — |
| #8 | Pennsylvania | $15.6B | — |
| #9 | New Jersey | $14.31B | — |
| #10 | Tennessee | $14.08B | — |
| #11 | Arizona | $13.16B | — |
| #12 | Michigan | $12.7B | — |
| #13 | North Carolina | $12.16B | — |
| #14 | Indiana | $10.96B | — |
| #15 | Massachusetts | $9.4B | — |
| #16 | Georgia | $9.01B | — |
| #17 | Minnesota | $8.49B | — |
| #18 | Nevada | $8.4B | — |
| #19 | Wisconsin | $7.59B | — |
| #20 | Virginia | $7.4B | — |
| #21 | Maryland | $6.85B | — |
| #22 | South Carolina | $6.44B | — |
| #23 | Connecticut | $6.23B | — |
| #24 | Kentucky | $5.8B | — |
| #25 | Missouri | $5.26B | — |
| #26 | Mississippi | $5.07B | — |
| #27 | Arkansas | $5.07B | — |
| #28 | Louisiana | $4.87B | — |
| #29 | Hawaii | $4.79B | — |
| #30 | Colorado | $4.67B | — |
| #31 | Iowa | $4.64B | — |
| #32 | Utah | $4.63B | — |
| #33 | Alabama | $4.59B | — |
| #34 | Kansas | $4.33B | — |
| #35 | New Mexico | $4.33B | — |
| #36 | Oklahoma | $3.81B | — |
| #37 | Idaho | $3.09B | — |
| #38 | Nebraska | $2.97B | — |
| #39 | Maine | $2.35B | — |
| #40 | West Virginia | $1.82B | — |
| #41 | South Dakota | $1.68B | — |
| #42 | Rhode Island | $1.63B | — |
| #43 | Oregon | $1.34B | — |
| #44 | North Dakota | $1.32B | — |
| #45 | Wyoming | $1.01B | — |
| #46 | Vermont | $597.33M | — |
| #47 | Alaska | $0 | — |
| #47 | Delaware | $0 | — |
| #47 | Montana | $0 | — |
| #47 | New Hampshire | $0 | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Census categories allow consistent comparisons. These selected categories are not a breakdown of the current New York appropriations act.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current operations for public welfare institutions and other public welfare, excluding capital and transfers.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New York stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New York has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $156.71B | — |
| #2 | New York · your comparison | $97.35B | — |
| #3 | Texas | $57.32B | — |
| #4 | Illinois | $41.13B | — |
| #5 | Florida | $40.11B | — |
| #6 | Ohio | $39.77B | — |
| #7 | Pennsylvania | $39.34B | — |
| #8 | Massachusetts | $34.12B | — |
| #9 | North Carolina | $30.64B | — |
| #10 | New Jersey | $28.06B | — |
| #11 | Arizona | $26.02B | — |
| #12 | Michigan | $24.37B | — |
| #13 | Virginia | $23.68B | — |
| #14 | Minnesota | $23.37B | — |
| #15 | Indiana | $22.93B | — |
| #16 | Maryland | $21.61B | — |
| #17 | Kentucky | $20.54B | — |
| #18 | Oregon | $20.47B | — |
| #19 | Washington | $19.6B | — |
| #20 | Georgia | $18.99B | — |
| #21 | Louisiana | $18.69B | — |
| #22 | Tennessee | $16.42B | — |
| #23 | Wisconsin | $16.26B | — |
| #24 | Missouri | $15.65B | — |
| #25 | Oklahoma | $14.57B | — |
| #26 | Colorado | $13.6B | — |
| #27 | South Carolina | $12.84B | — |
| #28 | New Mexico | $10.72B | — |
| #29 | Iowa | $10.26B | — |
| #30 | Alabama | $9.73B | — |
| #31 | Arkansas | $8.67B | — |
| #32 | Mississippi | $8.08B | — |
| #33 | Utah | $6.91B | — |
| #34 | Kansas | $6.84B | — |
| #35 | Nevada | $6.62B | — |
| #36 | West Virginia | $6.24B | — |
| #37 | Maine | $5.7B | — |
| #38 | Nebraska | $4.97B | — |
| #39 | Connecticut | $4.88B | — |
| #40 | Rhode Island | $4.54B | — |
| #41 | Hawaii | $4.14B | — |
| #42 | Delaware | $3.97B | — |
| #43 | Idaho | $3.73B | — |
| #44 | Alaska | $3.27B | — |
| #45 | Montana | $2.89B | — |
| #46 | New Hampshire | $2.72B | — |
| #47 | Vermont | $2.69B | — |
| #48 | North Dakota | $2.09B | — |
| #49 | South Dakota | $1.95B | — |
| #50 | Wyoming | $1.09B | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The enacted plan, spending categories and audited activity use different periods and accounting scopes; they are kept separate.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Sum of Census current-operation expenditure categories, excluding capital outlay, interest, and assistance/subsidy expenditure.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. This FY2024 comparison differs in scope and period from New York’s FY2027 appropriations and Fiscal year ended March 31, 2026 audit shown below.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New York stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New York has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $287.03B | — |
| #2 | New York · your comparison | $161.37B | — |
| #3 | Texas | $136.18B | — |
| #4 | Florida | $86.61B | — |
| #5 | Pennsylvania | $77.15B | — |
| #6 | Illinois | $75.67B | — |
| #7 | Ohio | $66.77B | — |
| #8 | New Jersey | $64.53B | — |
| #9 | Massachusetts | $61.38B | — |
| #10 | North Carolina | $59.01B | — |
| #11 | Michigan | $57.27B | — |
| #12 | Virginia | $53.45B | — |
| #13 | Washington | $49.82B | — |
| #14 | Georgia | $45.19B | — |
| #15 | Maryland | $45.06B | — |
| #16 | Oregon | $41.41B | — |
| #17 | Arizona | $38.71B | — |
| #18 | Minnesota | $38.1B | — |
| #19 | Indiana | $37.4B | — |
| #20 | Kentucky | $36.94B | — |
| #21 | Wisconsin | $34.5B | — |
| #22 | Missouri | $34.43B | — |
| #23 | South Carolina | $32.85B | — |
| #24 | Colorado | $32.73B | — |
| #25 | Louisiana | $31.67B | — |
| #26 | Tennessee | $31.12B | — |
| #27 | Alabama | $26.99B | — |
| #28 | Oklahoma | $24.28B | — |
| #29 | Utah | $22.7B | — |
| #30 | New Mexico | $21.94B | — |
| #31 | Connecticut | $21.22B | — |
| #32 | Iowa | $19.89B | — |
| #33 | Kansas | $18.39B | — |
| #34 | Hawaii | $16.62B | — |
| #35 | Mississippi | $16.46B | — |
| #36 | Arkansas | $16.28B | — |
| #37 | West Virginia | $13.19B | — |
| #38 | Nevada | $12.43B | — |
| #39 | Nebraska | $10.41B | — |
| #40 | Maine | $10.12B | — |
| #41 | Delaware | $9.24B | — |
| #42 | Rhode Island | $8.93B | — |
| #43 | Alaska | $8.4B | — |
| #44 | Idaho | $8.21B | — |
| #45 | New Hampshire | $7.12B | — |
| #46 | Montana | $6.44B | — |
| #47 | Vermont | $6.28B | — |
| #48 | North Dakota | $5.63B | — |
| #49 | South Dakota | $4.55B | — |
| #50 | Wyoming | $4.01B | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Projected cash disbursements across all governmental funds in the enacted Financial Plan. The total includes state operating funds, federal operating aid, capital projects, and debt service; it is a spending plan rather than a GAAP expense total.
Shares of the $131.4 billion in taxes reported as general revenue by New York's governmental activities. This denominator excludes federal grants, service charges, investment income, business-type activities, and locally collected property taxes.
The enacted Financial Plan's complete $277.0 billion cash-disbursement table, consolidated into mutually exclusive public functions. The grouped figures reconcile exactly to the same all-governmental-funds total shown above.
Audited government-wide activity for New York's primary government. Revenue includes program and general revenue; these are accrual-accounting results, not the FY2027 cash spending plan.
Explore statements about budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt from FactVote’s New York candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
Stop Albany’s tax-and-spend policies by auditing government spending, scrutinizing state contracts, protecting the property tax cap, and demanding better value for taxpayers.
Stop Albany’s tax-and-spend policies by auditing government spending, scrutinizing state contracts, protecting the property tax cap, and demanding better value for taxpayers.Joseph Hernandez — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Hernandez will aggressively audit state agencies, public authorities, programs, and major spending initiatives to identify waste, unnecessary costs, and programs that are failing to deliver results. He will scrutinize the state budget for excessive spending, hidden liabilities, unrealistic assumptio…
Hernandez will aggressively audit state agencies, public authorities, programs, and major spending initiatives to identify waste, unnecessary costs, and programs that are failing to deliver results. He will scrutinize the state budget for excessive spending, hidden liabilities, unrealistic assumptions, and long-term obligations that put taxpayers at risk.Joseph Hernandez — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
As a Village Trustee and Budget Officer, Nick helped reduce Village debt by more than 20% while maintaining essential services and strengthening public safety. At the Suffolk County Board of Elections, he worked to administer fair, secure, and accessible elections. At the County Legislature, he help…
As a Village Trustee and Budget Officer, Nick helped reduce Village debt by more than 20% while maintaining essential services and strengthening public safety. At the Suffolk County Board of Elections, he worked to administer fair, secure, and accessible elections. At the County Legislature, he helped manage the legislative agenda and worked with officials across Suffolk County on budgets, public safety, infrastructure, and other issues affecting Long Island taxpayers.Nick LaLota — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Nicole is a founding member of the Congressional SALT Caucus and a cosponsor of HR 613 to restore the State and Local Tax deduction and she has sponsored HR 5933 and 5985 to create inspectors general to root out waste, fraud and abuse in state spending and the budgets of major cities, like New York.
Nicole is a founding member of the Congressional SALT Caucus and a cosponsor of HR 613 to restore the State and Local Tax deduction and she has sponsored HR 5933 and 5985 to create inspectors general to root out waste, fraud and abuse in state spending and the budgets of major cities, like New York.Nicole Malliotakis — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
This section matches specific budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt terms in retained, attributed source text from published New York candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New York legislators and New York’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New York’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
68 matching sponsorships or proposals · 36 New York incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
New York State Assembly · District 88 · –NY
1 proposalFeb 23, 2022 · referred to codes
Asm. Amy Paulin · Sponsored
Creates the criminal justice infrastructure investment grant program which provides grants to municipalities, courts, sheriffs' offices and district attorneys' offices to provide software and hardware to assist with discovery, speedy trial and bail processes.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on February 23, 2022: referred to codes.
The official record directly addresses an index offense, crime prevention, law enforcement, sentencing, supervision, corrections, or victim safety. It does not establish an effect on New York's reported index-crime count or rate.
Retained New York evidence context: Reported Index crimes. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Creates the criminal justice infrastructure investment grant program which provides grants to municipalities, courts, sheriffs' offices and district attorneys' offices to provide software and hardware to assist with discovery, speedy trial and bail processes.Review official supporting evidence ↗
New York State Assembly · District 28 · –NY
4 proposalsJan 7, 2026 · referred to children and families
Asm. Andrew Hevesi · Sponsored
Establishes the permanent child care workforce pay equity fund and provides for the distribution thereof; makes an appropriation therefor.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 7, 2026: referred to children and families.
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It is household-income context and does not establish an effect on New York's median household income.
Retained New York evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Establishes the permanent child care workforce pay equity fund and provides for the distribution thereof; makes an appropriation therefor.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Jan 3, 2024 · referred to children and families
Asm. Andrew Hevesi · Sponsored
Establishes the statewide childcare workforce living wage fund to improve workforce conditions for employees of childcare services and programs through grants for salary increases, workforce retention bonuses and recruitment bonuses, indirect costs associated with implementing salary increases and bonuses, costs associated with employee health and fringe benefits and provider pay in certain circumstances; makes an appropriation therefor.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 3, 2024: referred to children and families.
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It is household-income context and does not establish an effect on New York's median household income.
Retained New York evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Establishes the statewide childcare workforce living wage fund to improve workforce conditions for employees of childcare services and programs through grants for salary increases, workforce retention bonuses and recruitment bonuses, indirect costs associated with implementing salary increases and bonuses, costs associated with employee health and fringe benefits and provider pay in certain circumstances; makes an appropriation therefor.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nov 18, 2022 · enacting clause stricken
Asm. Andrew Hevesi · Sponsored
Relates to reimbursements for domestic violence services for programs effected by certain provisions of the 2019-20 budget.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on November 18, 2022: enacting clause stricken.
The official record directly addresses an index offense, crime prevention, law enforcement, sentencing, supervision, corrections, or victim safety. It does not establish an effect on New York's reported index-crime count or rate.
Retained New York evidence context: Reported Index crimes. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Relates to reimbursements for domestic violence services for programs effected by certain provisions of the 2019-20 budget.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Jan 8, 2020 · referred to social services
Asm. Andrew Hevesi · Sponsored
Relates to reimbursements for domestic violence services for programs effected by certain provisions of the 2019-20 budget.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 8, 2020: referred to social services.
The official record directly addresses an index offense, crime prevention, law enforcement, sentencing, supervision, corrections, or victim safety. It does not establish an effect on New York's reported index-crime count or rate.
Retained New York evidence context: Reported Index crimes. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Relates to reimbursements for domestic violence services for programs effected by certain provisions of the 2019-20 budget.Review official supporting evidence ↗
New York State Assembly · District 105 · –NY
1 proposalMay 2, 2024 · referred to codes
Asm. Anil Beephan, Jr. · Sponsored
Directs the division of criminal justice services to establish the safer communities grant program making grants available to investigative or prosecutorial entities involved with cases of homicides, rapes, sexual assaults, kidnappings, and non-fatal shootings; requires a report to the legislature; makes an appropriation therefor.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on May 2, 2024: referred to codes.
The official record directly addresses an index offense, crime prevention, law enforcement, sentencing, supervision, corrections, or victim safety. It does not establish an effect on New York's reported index-crime count or rate.
Retained New York evidence context: Reported Index crimes. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Directs the division of criminal justice services to establish the safer communities grant program making grants available to investigative or prosecutorial entities involved with cases of homicides, rapes, sexual assaults, kidnappings, and non-fatal shootings; requires a report to the legislature; makes an appropriation therefor.Review official supporting evidence ↗
New York State Assembly · District 113 · –NY
1 proposalApr 30, 2025 · substituted by s3735
Asm. Carrie Woerner · Sponsored
Empowers the commissioner of education to declare a disaster has substantially impacted an annual meeting and election and to allow school boards to set an additional day for voting if less than eight percent of registered voters cast ballots as a direct consequence of a disaster.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on April 30, 2025: substituted by s3735.
The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed presidential-primary ballot count.
Retained New York evidence context: Active registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Empowers the commissioner of education to declare a disaster has substantially impacted an annual meeting and election and to allow school boards to set an additional day for voting if less than eight percent of registered voters cast ballots as a direct consequence of a disaster.Review official supporting evidence ↗
New York State Assembly · District 95 · –NY
2 proposalsJan 7, 2026 · referred to governmental operations
Asm. Dana Levenberg · Sponsored
Prohibits a member of the legislature from disbursing or making public moneys pursuant to a memoranda of understanding regarding certain line item appropriations prior to such member's election.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 7, 2026: referred to governmental operations.
The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed presidential-primary ballot count.
Retained New York evidence context: Active registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Prohibits a member of the legislature from disbursing or making public moneys pursuant to a memoranda of understanding regarding certain line item appropriations prior to such member's election.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Jan 3, 2024 · referred to governmental operations
Asm. Dana Levenberg · Sponsored
Prohibits a member of the legislature from disbursing or making public moneys pursuant to a memoranda of understanding regarding certain line item appropriations prior to such member's election.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 3, 2024: referred to governmental operations.
The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed presidential-primary ballot count.
Retained New York evidence context: Active registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Prohibits a member of the legislature from disbursing or making public moneys pursuant to a memoranda of understanding regarding certain line item appropriations prior to such member's election.Review official supporting evidence ↗
New York State Assembly · District 147 · –NY
2 proposalsJan 7, 2026 · referred to health
Asm. David DiPietro · Sponsored
Enacts the "life appropriation act" prohibiting state funding for abortions and related costs; regulates abortions and prohibits dismemberment abortions.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 7, 2026: referred to health.
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on the displayed New York induced-abortion count.
Retained New York evidence context: Reported induced abortions. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Relates to enacting the life appropriation act prohibiting funding for abortion and related costs and prohibiting dismemberment abortions; repealerReview official supporting evidence ↗
Jul 13, 2020 · held for consideration in health
Asm. David DiPietro · Sponsored
Enacts the "life appropriation act" prohibiting state funding for abortions and related costs; regulates abortions and prohibits dismemberment abortions.
The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on July 13, 2020: held for consideration in health.
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on the displayed New York induced-abortion count.
Retained New York evidence context: Reported induced abortions. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Relates to enacting the life appropriation act prohibiting funding for abortion and related costs and prohibiting dismemberment abortionsReview official supporting evidence ↗
Only current New York officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New York statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 3, 2026.