New Mexico · individual fact

New Mexico health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages10.1%2024 · #9 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 6512.4%2024 · #9 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6553.3%2024 · #50 of 50 · highest first

New Mexico over time

Explore New Mexico readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Mexico officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Mexico effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Mexico change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages New Mexico · source units
New MexicoPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 10.1%7.2%11.4%15.5%New Mexico, 2014: 14.5%New Mexico, 2015: 10.9%New Mexico, 2016: 9.2%New Mexico, 2017: 9.1%New Mexico, 2018: 9.5%New Mexico, 2019: 10%New Mexico, 2021: 10%New Mexico, 2022: 8.2%New Mexico, 2023: 9.1%New Mexico, 2024: 10.1%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● New Mexico Legislature · 4● U.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · 3◆ Governor · 3■ New Mexico agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2010-03-012026-06-30

10 of 10 reviewed New Mexico actions match · 10 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

New Mexico · 2024: 10.1% · Rank #9 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New Mexico Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodNew MexicoRankU.S. benchmark
202410.1%#9 of 508.2%
20239.1%#12 of 50Not available
20228.2%#18 of 50Not available
202110%#11 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
201910%#15 of 50Not available
20189.5%#16 of 50Not available
20179.1%#16 of 50Not available
20169.2%#14 of 50Not available
201510.9%#13 of 50Not available
201414.5%#8 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New Mexico · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

New Mexico · 202410.1%
New Mexico rank#9among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Uninsured rate · all ages history in New Mexico7.3%11.4%15.4%20142024
2024 · New Mexico: 10.1% · Rank #9 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
201414.5%
201510.9%
20169.2%
20179.1%
20189.5%
201910%
2020Not available
202110%
20228.2%
20239.1%
202410.1%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 10.1%2024 · Rank #9 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico · your comparison10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

12.4%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of New Mexico’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
New Mexico · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare New Mexico with every state.

New Mexico · 2020$8,902
New Mexico rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in New Mexico$6.53K$8.6K$10.67K20142020
2020 · New Mexico: $8,902 · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
2014$7,010
2015$7,418
2016$7,717
2017$7,973
2018$8,154
2019$8,459
2020$8,902

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · $8,9022020 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico · your comparison$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

New Mexico · 202274.5 years
New Mexico rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total New Mexico population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Life expectancy at birth history in New Mexico72.3 years75.3 years78.2 years20182022
2022 · New Mexico: 74.5 years · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
201877.2 years
201976.9 years
202074.5 years
202173 years
202274.5 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 74.5 years2022 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico · your comparison74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

New Mexico · 202310.8%
New Mexico rank#18among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in New Mexico9.7%11%12.3%20192023
2023 · New Mexico: 10.8% · Rank #18 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
201911.1%
202011.2%
202112%
202211.2%
202310.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 10.8%2023 · Rank #18 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 9.3% – 12.6%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico · your comparison10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

New Mexico · June 30, 202631.4%
New Mexico rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 31.4%June 30, 2026 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico · your comparison31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

New Mexico · 2020$7,424
New Mexico rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · $7,4242020 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico · your comparison$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

New Mexico · 2023–202423.9%
New Mexico rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 23.9%2023–2024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico · your comparison23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s New Mexico candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

44 statements from 9 candidates

2026 New Mexico Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Raúl Torrez

2 statements

Democratic · Attorney General · NM

Health coverage

The Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigates and prosecutes fraud committed by Medicaid providers, including hospitals, nursing homes, care facilities, laboratories, doctors, dentists, nurses, personal care providers, and therapists. We conduct investigations into billing for services not rendered, …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Medicaid Fraud Control Unit

Candidate campaign source

The Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigates and prosecutes fraud committed by Medicaid providers, including hospitals, nursing homes, care facilities, laboratories, doctors, dentists, nurses, personal care providers, and therapists. We conduct investigations into billing for services not rendered, billing for a higher level of service than provided, fraudulent prescriptions for dangerous opioids and narcotics, and whistleblower actions brought by an individual on behalf of the government. How Medicaid providers commit fraud is constantly evolving and the Unit must adjust accordingly to protect the system that helps so many New Mexicans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Raúl Torrez campaign source 16 ↗
View 1 more statement from Raúl Torrez
Healthcare costs

Torrez has gone after the industries hitting New Mexico families’ wallets hardest. He capped the price of insulin at $35. He blocked a grocery merger that would have pushed prices even higher. He forced utilities to return $115 million to overcharged customers. And when hotels and contractors tried …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Protecting Families' Pocketbooks

Candidate campaign source

Torrez has gone after the industries hitting New Mexico families’ wallets hardest. He capped the price of insulin at $35. He blocked a grocery merger that would have pushed prices even higher. He forced utilities to return $115 million to overcharged customers. And when hotels and contractors tried to gouge families displaced by the South Fork and Salt fires, his office sent cease-and-desist letters and recovered thousands of dollars for the families affected.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Raúl Torrez campaign source 2 ↗

2026 New Mexico Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 23 statements

Deb Haaland

11 statements

Democratic · Governor · NM

Health coverage

Healthcare is under attack. Trump is gutting Medicaid and healthcare premiums are skyrocketing across the country. Cuts to Medicaid could mean longer drives, rural hospital closures, longer wait times to see a doctor, and more medical debt for everyone. The state stepped up to subsidize premiums, le…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare is under attack. Trump is gutting Medicaid and healthcare premiums are skyrocketing across the country. Cuts to Medicaid could mean longer drives, rural hospital closures, longer wait times to see a doctor, and more medical debt for everyone. The state stepped up to subsidize premiums, leading to record enrollment in New Mexico’s Affordable Care Act marketplace. In New Mexico, we also have a historic doctor shortage. As governor, Deb will fight to protect access to healthcare, address the shortage of healthcare providers, and ensure the state is always fighting for the health of our communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 10 more statements from Deb Haaland
Health coverage

Use budget surpluses to fill Medicaid gaps and hire more guides to help people keep and access their benefits.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Use budget surpluses to fill Medicaid gaps and hire more guides to help people keep and access their benefits.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Health coverage

Protect access for those who use the state’s health insurance marketplace by expanding New Mexico’s Health Care Affordability Fund.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Protect access for those who use the state’s health insurance marketplace by expanding New Mexico’s Health Care Affordability Fund.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Health coverage

“I understand what it’s like to not be able to make ends meet despite working multiple jobs – it shouldn’t be this way. We need to make groceries, housing, and health care more affordable.” New Mexicans are struggling to make ends meet – they are doing everything right and still can’t get by. Deb kn…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

“I understand what it’s like to not be able to make ends meet despite working multiple jobs – it shouldn’t be this way. We need to make groceries, housing, and health care more affordable.” New Mexicans are struggling to make ends meet – they are doing everything right and still can’t get by. Deb knows this firsthand – she relied on benefits like SNAP, WIC, and Medicaid and moved forward after starting her own business selling salsa. New Mexicans need higher wages and lower bills, cheaper rent, and a stronger economy. We have the potential to lead in tech, energy, film, and our outdoor economy. Deb will create jobs and deliver on making New Mexico more affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Increase mobile health clinics to reach New Mexicans in rural areas and protect rural hospitals.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: | Healthcare

Candidate campaign source

Increase mobile health clinics to reach New Mexicans in rural areas and protect rural hospitals.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Deb Haaland is a fierce leader who stood up against attacks on our rights and the millionaires and billionaires rigging the system against hard working New Mexicans. When she’s Governor, Deb will protect our communities from Donald Trump and ICE so that we can focus on our biggest challenges – reduc…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Deb Haaland is a fierce leader who stood up against attacks on our rights and the millionaires and billionaires rigging the system against hard working New Mexicans. When she’s Governor, Deb will protect our communities from Donald Trump and ICE so that we can focus on our biggest challenges – reducing crime, bettering education, and bringing down prices on everything from healthcare to weekly groceries.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Care & public health

Expand down payment assistance programs for first time home buyers and assistance programs for workers in critical sectors such as education, healthcare, public safety, and social work.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Expand down payment assistance programs for first time home buyers and assistance programs for workers in critical sectors such as education, healthcare, public safety, and social work.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

“As Governor, I will focus every day on stopping violent crime, getting guns and drugs off our streets, and addressing the root causes of crime.” New Mexicans should feel safe and Deb knows that we have a lot of work to do to prevent and fight crime. She will work to keep violent criminals and illeg…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

“As Governor, I will focus every day on stopping violent crime, getting guns and drugs off our streets, and addressing the root causes of crime.” New Mexicans should feel safe and Deb knows that we have a lot of work to do to prevent and fight crime. She will work to keep violent criminals and illegal drugs off our streets and ensure law enforcement has the tools they need to fight crime, while addressing the root causes of crime. She will invest in mental health, substance abuse and rehabilitation programs to get people the help they need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Healthcare costs

Ban medical debt from being included on credit reports.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Ban medical debt from being included on credit reports.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Launch a full throttle operation to deliver mental health and homelessness assistance to New Mexicans in need.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Launch a full throttle operation to deliver mental health and homelessness assistance to New Mexicans in need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Adopt and expand statewide Community School Models that provide wrap-around services like counseling, school based health care, dental, family support, and community engagement at schools so parents and caregivers have convenient services while they’re working and caring for their families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Adopt and expand statewide Community School Models that provide wrap-around services like counseling, school based health care, dental, family support, and community engagement at schools so parents and caregivers have convenient services while they’re working and caring for their families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Gregg Hull

11 statements

Republican · Governor · NM

Care & public health

Every New Mexican deserves access to quality, affordable healthcare – and as Governor, Gregg Hull will work to deliver it.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Every New Mexican deserves access to quality, affordable healthcare – and as Governor, Gregg Hull will work to deliver it.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
View 10 more statements from Gregg Hull
Care & public health

Licensing should protect public health and safety, not trap people in paperwork. I support full license reciprocity for professionals licensed in good standing in another state unless there is a clear public safety concern. I also support firm timelines for licensing decisions, stronger accountabili…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

Licensing should protect public health and safety, not trap people in paperwork. I support full license reciprocity for professionals licensed in good standing in another state unless there is a clear public safety concern. I also support firm timelines for licensing decisions, stronger accountability for boards, reviewing or consolidating inactive boards, and eliminating licensing requirements that do not meaningfully protect health or safety, especially for entry-level jobs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

At the same time, New Mexico must remove unnecessary barriers that keep skilled workers from getting to work. Overly complex occupational licensing rules slow hiring, discourage relocation, and make it harder to start or expand a small business. In health care, the trades, and service industries, qu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

At the same time, New Mexico must remove unnecessary barriers that keep skilled workers from getting to work. Overly complex occupational licensing rules slow hiring, discourage relocation, and make it harder to start or expand a small business. In health care, the trades, and service industries, qualified professionals often face months-long delays that push them to work in other states.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Care & public health

Mental health must be addressed with accuracy and fairness. Many people live full, stable lives while managing conditions like anxiety, ADHD, or depression. These individuals should not be treated as automatic risks. The focus should stay on true crisis situations where there is clear, immediate dan…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Mental health must be addressed with accuracy and fairness. Many people live full, stable lives while managing conditions like anxiety, ADHD, or depression. These individuals should not be treated as automatic risks. The focus should stay on true crisis situations where there is clear, immediate danger, not on broad labels that discourage people from seeking help or speaking honestly with doctors.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Care & public health

Interstate medical compacts make it easier for qualified healthcare professionals to practice across state lines, including through telemedicine. New Mexico should take full advantage of these tools to expand access.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Interstate medical compacts make it easier for qualified healthcare professionals to practice across state lines, including through telemedicine. New Mexico should take full advantage of these tools to expand access.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Care & public health

Launch targeted programs to recruit healthcare professionals to New Mexico

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Launch targeted programs to recruit healthcare professionals to New Mexico

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Care & public health

Licensing should protect public health and safety, not trap people in paperwork. Right now, delays and inconsistent rules are making it harder to fill critical jobs across the state. In health care, qualified professionals often wait months just to get permission to work. Dentists, nurses, and docto…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy

Candidate campaign source

Licensing should protect public health and safety, not trap people in paperwork. Right now, delays and inconsistent rules are making it harder to fill critical jobs across the state. In health care, qualified professionals often wait months just to get permission to work. Dentists, nurses, and doctors are needed urgently, especially in rural communities, yet the licensing process can drag on so long that many simply choose to practice somewhere else. A lack of meaningful reciprocity makes the problem worse by forcing professionals to repeat steps they’ve already completed in another state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Care & public health

With smart enforcement, strong due process, fair mental health policy, and support for responsible ownership, New Mexico can reduce violence while respecting the freedoms of law-abiding citizens.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

With smart enforcement, strong due process, fair mental health policy, and support for responsible ownership, New Mexico can reduce violence while respecting the freedoms of law-abiding citizens.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Care & public health

As Governor, Gregg Hull will focus on practical reforms that expand access, stabilize rural healthcare, reduce costs, and make New Mexico a state where healthcare professionals want to practice and build their careers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, Gregg Hull will focus on practical reforms that expand access, stabilize rural healthcare, reduce costs, and make New Mexico a state where healthcare professionals want to practice and build their careers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Healthcare costs

Work to reduce prescription drug costs through transparency and competition

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Work to reduce prescription drug costs through transparency and competition

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Care & public health

At the same time, we must be honest about the growing list of responsibilities placed on police officers. Too often, they are asked to respond to mental health crises, addiction, and homelessness without the right tools or support. That is not fair to officers or the people they are trying to help. …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

At the same time, we must be honest about the growing list of responsibilities placed on police officers. Too often, they are asked to respond to mental health crises, addiction, and homelessness without the right tools or support. That is not fair to officers or the people they are trying to help. I support strengthening behavioral health services so trained civilian teams and medical professionals can assist on these calls, allowing police to focus on preventing crime, responding to emergencies, and enforcing the law.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · NM

Care & public health

I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then b…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Stephanie Garcia Richard for Lt. Governor: Fighting for our New Mexico

Candidate campaign source

I will bring real experience to making the office of Lieutenant Governor work for all New Mexicans. I was a school teacher for 19 years and served Los Alamos for six years as a State Representative, fighting for more funding for our public schools, crime prevention, and addiction treatment. I then became the first woman and first Hispana elected to be New Mexico's Commissioner of Public Lands, where I brought billions of dollars to New Mexico's public schools, increased renewable energy production sevenfold, restored stolen land back to Tribes, and protected more public land from federal land grabs than any Public Land Commissioner has done before.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Stephanie Garcia Richard — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 New Mexico U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Didi Okpareke

3 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · NM

Care & public health

As a pharmacist, Didi has spent her career on the front lines of our healthcare system. She will use that experience to create healthcare that is affordable and accessible for every New Mexico family, protecting quality of care, lowering costs at the pharmacy counter, and expanding access in the com…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

As a pharmacist, Didi has spent her career on the front lines of our healthcare system. She will use that experience to create healthcare that is affordable and accessible for every New Mexico family, protecting quality of care, lowering costs at the pharmacy counter, and expanding access in the communities that need it most.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Didi Okpareke — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 2 more statements from Didi Okpareke
Care & public health

Protect the quality of health care available to New Mexico patients.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Quality of Care

Candidate campaign source

Protect the quality of health care available to New Mexico patients.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Didi Okpareke — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Care & public health

Make health care affordable and accessible for every New Mexico family.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health-Care Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Make health care affordable and accessible for every New Mexico family.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Didi Okpareke — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Melanie Stansbury

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · NM

Care & public health

Health Care

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Current Congressional Issues

Government-published candidate material

Health Care

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Melanie Stansbury — official government primary source 13 ↗
View 1 more statement from Melanie Stansbury
Care & public health

ALBUQUERQUE – On day 24 of the Republican government shutdown, U.S. Representative Melanie Stansbury (NM-01) recapped a busy week at home connecting with New Mexicans and working to deliver for families across the state—while House Republicans continue to refuse to engage in bipartisan negotiations …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Government-published candidate material

ALBUQUERQUE – On day 24 of the Republican government shutdown, U.S. Representative Melanie Stansbury (NM-01) recapped a busy week at home connecting with New Mexicans and working to deliver for families across the state—while House Republicans continue to refuse to engage in bipartisan negotiations to save health care and fund the government.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Melanie Stansbury — official government primary source 14 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Mexico candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New Mexico incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Mexico legislators and New Mexico’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Mexico’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

7 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 New Mexico incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Cristina Parajón

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 25 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Cristina Parajón
New Mexico Legislature · HB 124

NEW AMERICANS DIVISION IN WSD

Mar 9, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 61

Cristina Parajón · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 124 creates a New Americans Division in the Workforce Solutions Department. The act defines new Americans as U.S. residents who are not citizens or were not citizens at birth; it does not impose a recent-arrival requirement. The reviewed section directs workforce and educational initiatives, identification of professional-licensing pathways, support for employers and economic sectors, and an information center that includes assistance to eligible lawful permanent residents seeking naturalization. The division’s report is due August 1, 2027, then July 1 each year, covering the preceding twelve months. These duties do not themselves grant citizenship, employment or a professional license.

Signed by Governor on 2026-03-09, Chapter 61 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. Section 9-26-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 3) is amended to read: "9-26-3. DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Workforce Solutions Department Act: A. "department" means the workforce solutions department; B. "new Americans" means people residing in the United States who are not citizens of the United States or who were not citizens of the United States at birth; and C. "secretary" means the secretary of workforce solutions." SECTION 2. Section 9-26-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 4) is amended to read: "9-26-4. WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS DEPARTMENT CREATED.--The "workforce solutions department" is created in the executive branch pursuant to the Executive Reorganization Act. The department is a cabinet department that includes: A. the office of the secretary; B. the administrative services division; C. the unemployment insurance division; D. the labor relations division; E. the workforce technology division; F. the workforce transition services division; and G. the new Americans division." SECTION 3. A new section of the Workforce Solutions Department Act is enacted to read: "NEW AMERICANS DIVISION--PURPOSE--DUTIES.-- A. The purpose of the new Americans division of the department is to support new Americans residing in New Mexico in achieving their maximum economic potential in New Mexico's workforce and as entrepreneurs. In furtherance of this purpose, the division shall: (1) support and expand educational, workforce training and other initiatives that improve the integration of new Americans into the state's economy; (2) identify strategies for improving licensure pathways for new Americans who have been professionally trained or licensed in another country; (3) assist businesses that employ new Americans by identifying, attracting and retaining top global talent required to remain competitive in a global economy; (4) identify and support pathways for new Americans to advance priority sectors identified in the state's workforce development and economic development plans; and (5) serve as an information center by providing resources and engagement opportunities to businesses, community-based organizations, workers, community members, state agencies and local governments on policies and legislation affecting new Americans, including supporting eligible lawful permanent residents in becoming naturalized United States citizens. B. The new Americans division shall, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the department, work with other divisions within the department, the economic development department, the higher education department, the public education department, the department of health, the health care authority, the homeland security and emergency management department, the department of public safety or the regulation and licensing department to fulfill the duties of the new Americans division. C. By August 1, 2027, and by July 1 of each year thereafter, the new Americans division shall provide a report to an interim committee that studies economic and rural development and policy, the secretary, the governor and members of the legislature on the activities of the division in the preceding twelve months, including an analysis of the economic impact, status, population and workforce numbers of new Americans in the state."
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Micaelita Debbie O'Malley

New Mexico Senate, District 13 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Micaelita Debbie O'Malley
New Mexico Legislature · SB 17

STOP ILLEGAL GUN TRADE ACT

Feb 12, 2026 · Action postponed indefinitely

Micaelita Debbie O'Malley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed introduced sections 3–4 of SB 17 proposed security rules for covered federally licensed firearm dealers in New Mexico, including alarms, entry protection and at least two years of video retention. The Department of Public Safety would determine which security rules apply to gun shows. Employees handling, selling or delivering firearms would have to be at least 21 and legally eligible to possess them. The proposal requires training within 30 days of hire and annually thereafter, with training before participation in sales from December 1, 2026. Topics include unlawful purchases, self-harm warning signs, theft prevention and safe storage. Use of the federal background-check system remains contingent on federal permission. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely; these are introduced-version proposals, not enacted rules or a review of later substitutes.

The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

D. "dealer" means a person or business in the state that holds a federal firearms license issued in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 923(a)(3); E. "department" means the department of public safety; […] SECTION 3. A new section of Chapter 30, Article 7 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read: " REQUIRING DEALER SECURITY MEASURES TO PREVENT THEFT AND LOSS OF FIREARMS.-- A. No later than July 1, 2026, the department, in collaboration with the attorney general, shall promulgate rules governing the physical security of dealer premises and inventory. The rules shall be effective beginning December 1, 2026 and shall require: (1) installation and use of security alarm systems on dealer premises that meet quality and other standards established by the department. Eligible security alarm systems shall have the capacity to be monitored by a central station and shall provide protection and monitoring for all accessible openings and partial motion and sound detection at all other areas of the premises; (2) site hardening, including locks on doors and windows and other features. Features shall be designed to prevent unauthorized entry, which may include bars or grates, security screens and commercial-grade metal doors; (3) installation and use of video surveillance systems, including video recording devices at each point of sale and each entrance and exit to the premises, which shall be recorded from both the indoor and outdoor vantage point, and the dealer shall maintain such recordings for a period of not less than two years; and (4) other reasonable requirements, as determined by the department and the attorney general, to reduce the risk of burglaries at dealers' premises and the theft of firearms in shipment to and from dealers' premises. B. The department shall specify in rules which, if any, of the security measures identified in Subsection A of this section apply to gun shows." SECTION 4. A new section of Chapter 30, Article 7 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read: " MINIMUM AGE OF EMPLOYMENT--REQUIRING BACKGROUND CHECKS AND TRAINING FOR DEALER EMPLOYEES.-- A. A dealer shall not employ a person to handle, sell or deliver firearms unless the person is at least twenty- one years of age and is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under state, municipal, tribal or federal law. The department shall promulgate rules to address dealer employee criminal history checks no later than August 1, 2026. The rules shall direct dealers to use the national instant criminal background check system to determine eligibility for current and prospective dealer employees only if the use of the national instant criminal background check system is permitted by federal regulations. B. A dealer shall complete the training developed by the department pursuant to Subsection C of this section and shall provide the training to all new employees within thirty days of employment and to all employees annually thereafter. Beginning December 1, 2026, no employee of any dealer shall participate in the sale or disposition of firearms unless that person has first received the training required by this section. The department shall promulgate rules setting forth minimum requirements for the maintenance of records of the training no later than August 1, 2026. C. No later than August 1, 2026, the department shall develop and make available to each dealer a training course in the conduct of firearm transfers, including: (1) federal and state laws governing firearm transfers and transactions; (2) how to recognize, identify, respond to and report straw purchases, illegal purchases and fraudulent activity; (3) how to recognize, identify, respond to and report an individual who intends to use a firearm for unlawful purposes or for self-harm; (4) how to prevent, respond to and report theft or burglary of firearms and ammunition; (5) how to educate customers on gun safety practices, including the safe handling and storage of firearms and ammunition; and (6) other topics the department deems necessary and appropriate."
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Peter Wirth

New Mexico Senate, District 25 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Peter Wirth
New Mexico Legislature · SB 30

REPORTING OF INDUCED ABORTIONS

Mar 6, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 48

Peter Wirth · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 30, officially titled Reporting of Induced Abortions, repeals Section 24-14-18 NMSA 1978. This connection concerns the statutory reporting framework behind abortion statistics. It does not establish a restriction on abortion access, a change to the earlier 2023 count, or that every other source of abortion reporting ended.

Signed by Governor on 2026-03-06, Chapter 48 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

This fact counts abortions obtained by New Mexico residents and reported as occurring in New Mexico in 2023. It excludes nonresidents and resident abortions obtained elsewhere. Repealing a reporting provision concerns future measurement and does not by itself establish changed abortion access or a change in the earlier reported count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Resident abortions reported in New Mexico. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. REPEAL.--Section 24-14-18 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1977, Chapter 206, Section 2, as amended) is repealed.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Reena Szczepanski

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 47 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Reena Szczepanski
New Mexico Legislature · HB 2

HEALTH CARE COVERAGE CHANGES

Oct 3, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 1

Reena Szczepanski · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 2 of the 2025 first-special-session HB 2 authorizes health-coverage rule and plan changes. If specified federal ACA changes would cause significant coverage loss, the Health Care Authority may expand eligibility to protect people at risk, subject to available funds. The separate plan concerns uninsured residents who do not qualify for federal premium assistance or exchange qualified health plans, with the stated exception for ineligibility by reason of incarceration, and prioritizes incomes below 200% of the federal poverty level. Reporting to the two specified legislative committees is due each October 31. This establishes authority and reporting requirements, not proof that the trigger occurred, rules were issued or additional people enrolled.

Signed by Governor on 2025-10-03, Chapter 1 of the 2025 1st Special Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures people under age 65 without health insurance. Eligibility for coverage directly concerns this population; payment for a particular service for people already insured does not itself establish expanded insurance enrollment. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Section 59A-23F-12 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2021, Chapter 136, Section 5, as amended) is amended to read: "59A-23F-12. HEALTH CARE AFFORDABILITY PLAN-- RULEMAKING--REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.-- A. Rules covering the following provisions may be amended as the health care authority determines: (1) providing enhanced premium and cost- sharing assistance to individuals and families for the purchase of qualified health plans on the New Mexico health insurance exchange. In providing this assistance, the health care authority shall develop health care affordability criteria designed to reduce the amount that individuals pay in premiums and out-of-pocket medical expenses for qualified health plans offered on the New Mexico health insurance exchange; and (2) establishing income eligibility parameters for the health care affordability criteria for plan year 2023 and each subsequent calendar year based on available funds. New Mexico residents who qualify shall: (a) have a household income below four hundred percent of the federal poverty level and qualify for the advanced premium tax credit under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; or (b) meet all eligibility criteria for the advanced premium tax credit under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act except for household income requirements. B. If the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is repealed in full or in part by an act of congress, invalidated by the United States supreme court or administered by the United States department of health and human services in a way that alters eligibility criteria for the advanced premium tax credit in a manner that would cause significant coverage loss for New Mexico residents, the health care authority may promulgate rules to minimize loss of coverage by expanding eligibility to cover individuals at risk of losing coverage due to such changes, subject to available funds. C. The health care authority, in consultation with the superintendent, the New Mexico medical insurance pool, the department of health and stakeholder groups, including health care providers that serve uninsured residents, health insurance carriers and consumer advocacy groups, may update the plan for extending health care coverage access to uninsured New Mexico residents who do not qualify for federal premium assistance or, except by reason of incarceration, qualified health plans, through the New Mexico health insurance exchange. The plan shall include: (1) details about health care benefits; (2) health care affordability criteria designed to reduce the amount that individuals pay in premiums and out-of-pocket medical expenses under the plan and that result in, to the greatest extent possible, health care costs comparable to costs for New Mexico residents for whom assistance is provided under Subsection A of this section; and (3) income eligibility parameters that prioritize eligibility for New Mexico residents with incomes under two hundred percent of the federal poverty level. D. On or before October 31, 2024 and each October 31 thereafter, the health care authority shall submit a report to the legislative finance committee and the legislative health and human services committee that includes: (1) a summary of the affordability criteria implemented pursuant to Subsections A, B and C of this section; (2) the estimated number of uninsured New Mexico residents who enrolled in coverage following implementation of the affordability criteria pursuant to Subsections A, B and C of this section; and (3) the amount in reduced costs and coverage assistance the initiatives provided in the current and previous calendar years by income level, county and coverage source."
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Melanie A. Stansbury

U.S. House of Representatives, New Mexico District 1 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Melanie A. Stansbury
U.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · HR 4734

Hands Off Our Social Security Act

Jul 23, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Melanie A. Stansbury · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 3 of HR 4734 would prohibit federal officers, special government employees and contractors from altering, withholding or delaying Social Security benefits without legal authorization, and would require an Act of Congress to modify benefits. Melanie Stansbury is the verified primary sponsor. The proposal concerns benefit administration, including OASDI, without establishing an increase in beneficiary counts or any completed benefit change.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts OASDI retirement, survivor and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Rules governing benefit delivery concern that program without proving changes in the number of recipients. SSI, Medicare, taxation of benefits and Social Security number issuance are separate matters. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Social Security beneficiaries. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.Prohibition on tampering with social security benefits (a) No Federal officer, special government employee, or contractor shall alter, withhold, or delay Social Security benefits in any manner that is not authorized by law. (b)Any action to modify Social Security benefits shall require an Act of Congress.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Ben Ray Luján

U.S. Senate, New Mexico · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Ben Ray Luján
U.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · S 3256

Disarm Hate Act

Nov 20, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Ben Ray Luján · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 3256 would restrict firearm transfer and possession for people convicted of the defined misdemeanor hate crimes or receiving the specified enhanced misdemeanor sentences. Its definitions require covered force, weapon threats or credible physical-safety threats and preserve counsel, jury-trial and specified expungement, pardon or restoration safeguards. Ben Ray Luján is the primary sponsor. The bill remains a proposal, with no mortality effect established.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Prevention of person who has been convicted of a misdemeanor hate crime, or received an enhanced sentence for a misdemeanor because of hate or bias in its commission, from obtaining a firearm(a)DefinitionsSection 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:(39)The term convicted in any court of a misdemeanor hate crime—(A)means being convicted by a court of an offense that—(i)is a misdemeanor under Federal, State, or Tribal law;(ii)has, as an element, that the conduct of the offender was motivated by hate or bias because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity (as defined in section 249), or disability of any person; and(iii)involves the use or attempted use of physical force, the threatened use of a deadly weapon, or another credible threat to the physical safety of any person; and(B)does not include—(i)a conviction of an offense described in subparagraph (A), unless—(I)the person—(aa)was represented by counsel in the case; or(bb)knowingly and intelligently waived the right to counsel in the case; and(II)in the case of a prosecution for an offense described in subparagraph (A) for which a person was entitled to a jury trial in the jurisdiction in which the case was tried—(aa)the case was tried by a jury; or(bb)the person knowingly and intelligently waived the right to have the case tried by a jury, by guilty plea or otherwise; or(ii)a conviction of an offense described in subparagraph (A) if—(I)the conviction—(aa)has been expunged or set aside; or(bb)is of an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the applicable jurisdiction provides for the loss of civil rights under such an offense); and(II)the expungement, pardon, or restoration of civil rights does not expressly provide that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms.(40)The term received from any court an enhanced hate crime misdemeanor sentence—(A)means a court has imposed a sentence for a misdemeanor under Federal, State, or Tribal law—(i)that involves the use or attempted use of physical force, the threatened use of a deadly weapon, or another credible threat to the physical safety of any person; and(ii)based, in whole or in part, on a judicial finding that the conduct of the offender was motivated, in whole or in part, by hate or bias for any reason referred to in paragraph (39)(A)(ii); and(B)does not include—(i)the imposition of a sentence described in subparagraph (A), unless—(I)the person—(aa)was represented by counsel in the case; or(bb)knowingly and intelligently waived the right to counsel in the case; and(II)if the sentence described in subparagraph (A) was imposed in a prosecution for an offense for which a person was entitled to a jury trial in the jurisdiction in which the case was tried—(aa)the case was tried by a jury; or(bb)the person knowingly and intelligently waived the right to have the case tried by a jury, by guilty plea or otherwise; or(ii)the imposition of a sentence described in subparagraph (A) if—(I)(aa)the conviction of the offense for which the sentence was imposed has been expunged or set aside; or(bb)the offense for which the sentence was imposed is an offense for which the person has been pardoned or has had civil rights restored (if the law of the applicable jurisdiction provides for the loss of civil rights under such an offense); and(II)the expungement, pardon, or restoration of civil rights does not expressly provide that the person may not ship, transport, possess, or receive firearms..(b)Prohibition on sale or other disposition of firearmSection 922(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the first sentence—(1)in paragraph (10), by striking or at the end;(2)by redesignating paragraph (11) as paragraph (12);(3)in paragraph (12), as so redesignated, by striking through (10) and inserting through (11); and(4)by inserting after paragraph (10) the following:(11)has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor hate crime, or has received from any court an enhanced hate crime misdemeanor sentence; or.(c)Prohibition on possession, shipment, or transport of firearmSection 922(g) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—(1)in paragraph (8), by striking or at the end;(2)in paragraph (9), by striking the comma and inserting ; or; and(3)by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:(10)who has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor hate crime, or has received from any court an enhanced hate crime misdemeanor sentence,.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New Mexico officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Mexico statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.