Montana · individual fact

Montana income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Montana’s tax structure.

Median household income$72.51K2020–2024 · #36 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$41.71K2020–2024 · #27 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$59.2K2024 · #19 of 50 · highest first

Montana over time

Explore Montana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Montana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Montana effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Montana change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Montana · source units
MontanaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $59,203$43.54K$52.87K$62.19KMontana, 2014: $45,344Montana, 2015: $46,713Montana, 2016: $47,039Montana, 2017: $48,274Montana, 2018: $50,168Montana, 2019: $50,997Montana, 2020: $55,801Montana, 2021: $59,635Montana, 2022: $59,372Montana, 2023: $60,386Montana, 2024: $59,203201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Montana Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · Montana delegation · 2◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Montana agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

5 of 5 reviewed Montana actions match · 5 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Montana · 2024: $59,203 · Rank #19 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Montana Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodMontanaRankU.S. benchmark
2024$59,203#19 of 50$59,195
2023$60,386#14 of 50$58,088
2022$59,372#15 of 50$57,104
2021$59,635#21 of 50$59,365
2020$55,801#21 of 50$56,514
2019$50,997#30 of 50$53,683
2018$50,168#30 of 50$52,242
2017$48,274#31 of 50$51,006
2016$47,039#30 of 50$49,828
2015$46,713#32 of 50$49,396
2014$45,344#31 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Montana · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Montana · 2020–2024$72,509
Montana rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Montana · $72,5092020–2024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $71,748 – $73,270Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana · your comparison$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$72,5092020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Montana households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Montana · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Montana · 2024$59,203
Montana rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Montana
Real personal income per person history in Montana$43.09K$52.87K$62.64K20142024
2024 · Montana: $59,203 · Rank #19 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Montana Real personal income per person history
PeriodMontanaCompare
2014$45,344
2015$46,713
2016$47,039
2017$48,274
2018$50,168
2019$50,997
2020$55,801
2021$59,635
2022$59,372
2023$60,386
2024$59,203

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Montana · $59,2032024 · Rank #19 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana · your comparison$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Montana · state comparison

How Montana raises taxes

For tax year 2026, ordinary taxable income is taxed at 4.7% through $47,500 for single and separate filers, $71,250 for heads of household, and $95,000 for joint filers; income above the applicable threshold is taxed at 5.65%. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Montana · FY2024$2.25B
Montana rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Montana · $2.25BFY2024 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana · your comparison$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Montana income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Montana ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Montana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

43 statements from 7 candidates

2026 Montana U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Aaron Flint

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · MT

Taxes & tax policy

1. Expand timber harvests and resource extraction to create good-paying jobs. 2. Invest in workforce training, apprenticeships, and trade programs that prepare Montanans for high-demand careers. 3. Cut burdensome regulations that make it harder for small businesses, farmers, ranchers, and manufactur…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: On the Issues

Candidate campaign source

1. Expand timber harvests and resource extraction to create good-paying jobs. 2. Invest in workforce training, apprenticeships, and trade programs that prepare Montanans for high-demand careers. 3. Cut burdensome regulations that make it harder for small businesses, farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers to grow and hire workers. 4. Support made-in-Montana agriculture, protecting family farms and ranches. 5. Repeal the expensive taxes that prevent family farms, ranches, and small businesses from staying in the family.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Aaron Flint campaign source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Aaron Flint
Taxes & tax policy

1. Ban Wall Street from buying single-family homes. 2. The HELPER Act which authorizes federally backed mortgages for first responders and school teachers to buy a home in the community they serve. 3. Invest in programs that lead to good-paying jobs like the trades, logging, and manufacturing. 4. Ma…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: On the Issues

Candidate campaign source

1. Ban Wall Street from buying single-family homes. 2. The HELPER Act which authorizes federally backed mortgages for first responders and school teachers to buy a home in the community they serve. 3. Invest in programs that lead to good-paying jobs like the trades, logging, and manufacturing. 4. Make permanent the recent working families tax breaks like no tax on tips, overtime, and Social Security. 5. Unleash American energy for abundant and affordable energy to power our homes and businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Aaron Flint campaign source 2 ↗

Sam Forstag

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MT

Taxes & tax policy

Make Taxes Work for Working People

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Make Taxes Work for Working People

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sam Forstag — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from Sam Forstag
Income & wages

Raise Wages and Strengthen Unions

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Raise Wages and Strengthen Unions

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Sam Forstag — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Montana U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 14 statements

Independent · U.S. House District 2 · MT

Taxes & tax policy

National Firearms Act (NFA): The NFA should be retained but revised — it makes sense to prevent the sale of fully-automatic weapons and grenade launchers to the public at large, but other current restrictions have little impact upon gun crimes (i.e.: a difference of 2 inches in barrel length does no…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Gun policy

Candidate campaign source

National Firearms Act (NFA): The NFA should be retained but revised — it makes sense to prevent the sale of fully-automatic weapons and grenade launchers to the public at large, but other current restrictions have little impact upon gun crimes (i.e.: a difference of 2 inches in barrel length does nothing to prevent illicit use). Effective January 1, 2026, the federal tax stamp fee for National Firearms Act (NFA) items, including suppressors and short-barreled rifles, was reduced from $200 to $0. While the monetary fee has been eliminated, the legal requirement to register these items by filing an ATF Form 1 or Form 4, submitting fingerprints, and passing a background check remains fully in effect.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 12 more statements from Michael D. Eisenhauer
Taxes & tax policy

Support efforts for targeted tax relief for the middle- and lower-classes, and for small business fairness

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Support efforts for targeted tax relief for the middle- and lower-classes, and for small business fairness

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Increase property tax rates for corporate or large-volume private-equity landlords (this will require provisions that the increases are not passed through to individual renters)

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

Increase property tax rates for corporate or large-volume private-equity landlords (this will require provisions that the increases are not passed through to individual renters)

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Solution #5: Congress must take back control over tariffs and trade policy. The Constitution gives Congress — not the President — the power to impose tariffs. Article I, Section 8 clearly states that lawmakers have the authority “to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises.” For much of Am…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Solution #5: Congress must take back control over tariffs and trade policy. The Constitution gives Congress — not the President — the power to impose tariffs. Article I, Section 8 clearly states that lawmakers have the authority “to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises.” For much of American history, this was a core congressional prerogative. But over the past century (especially after the economic catastrophe of the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act), Congress began steadily ceding this power to the executive branch, hoping presidents would take a broader, less protectionist view.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Any successful effort must first protect a person’s ability to see the doctor of their choice, and must retain coverage for preexisting conditions. I do not believe that a single-payer system will be workable, and if government-operated will inevitably raise taxes significantly. Above all else, I wi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Any successful effort must first protect a person’s ability to see the doctor of their choice, and must retain coverage for preexisting conditions. I do not believe that a single-payer system will be workable, and if government-operated will inevitably raise taxes significantly. Above all else, I will fight hard to defend and protect rural healthcare in Montana.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Tax incentives for home builders to encourage multi-family dwelling construction

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Tax incentives for home builders to encourage multi-family dwelling construction

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Income & wages

Montanans know what officials in Washington seem to have forgotten – Social Security benefits were earned by Americans by putting in a hard days’ work and paying into the fund for decades. Social Security trust funds belong to the people, and not to Wall Street bankers or Washington. Because of this…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Retirement security and Social Security

Candidate campaign source

Montanans know what officials in Washington seem to have forgotten – Social Security benefits were earned by Americans by putting in a hard days’ work and paying into the fund for decades. Social Security trust funds belong to the people, and not to Wall Street bankers or Washington. Because of this, it is not appropriate to invest Social Security trust funds into riskier assets such as the open stock market rather than more secure US Government Securities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Support bipartisan efforts to create reasonable tax rates for multi-national and large corporations

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Support bipartisan efforts to create reasonable tax rates for multi-national and large corporations

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Tariffs will not make America rich again. Instead, tariffs are an indirect tax on Americans that will inevitably be passed along in the form of higher prices for imported goods and business inputs; this leads to higher inflation and pressures companies to cut jobs or delay growth. We’ve already seen…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Tariffs will not make America rich again. Instead, tariffs are an indirect tax on Americans that will inevitably be passed along in the form of higher prices for imported goods and business inputs; this leads to higher inflation and pressures companies to cut jobs or delay growth. We’ve already seen the administration begin to reduce those tariffs in certain sectors in an effort to stem losses and falling popular support.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

5. Local Control is Paramount. I do not believe in either a federal or statewide mandate in either direction, for or against, with respect to data centers. Some communities may not want them, whereas other communities may. Some may not be interested the tax-base and local employment opportunities (o…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

5. Local Control is Paramount. I do not believe in either a federal or statewide mandate in either direction, for or against, with respect to data centers. Some communities may not want them, whereas other communities may. Some may not be interested the tax-base and local employment opportunities (or community enhancements), whereas others may be interested. It is a matter of local and regional choice – if for no other reason than that they are the group most likely to be affected by any ultimate decision to proceed.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Property tax relief to qualified homeowners, and to 1st-time homebuyers for the first 3 years

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

Property tax relief to qualified homeowners, and to 1st-time homebuyers for the first 3 years

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Targeted reductions in capital gains taxes for older homeowners, thereby avoiding a significant tax penalty

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Targeted reductions in capital gains taxes for older homeowners, thereby avoiding a significant tax penalty

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Recognize that tariffs represent a tax on the American consumer and small businesses, and not on the international manufacturer

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Recognize that tariffs represent a tax on the American consumer and small businesses, and not on the international manufacturer

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

Troy Downing

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · MT

Taxes & tax policy

Today, he continues his service as a Congressman for Montana’s Second Congressional District, where he fights for conservative values and works to secure a strong, prosperous future for Montana. Downing advocates for lower taxes, reducing government regulation, and championing policies that promote …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Today, he continues his service as a Congressman for Montana’s Second Congressional District, where he fights for conservative values and works to secure a strong, prosperous future for Montana. Downing advocates for lower taxes, reducing government regulation, and championing policies that promote economic growth, energy independence, and national security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Troy Downing — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Montana U.S. Senate — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 25 statements

Alani Bankhead

21 statements

Democratic · U.S. Senate · MT

Taxes & tax policy

✓ Keep federal education dollars in public schools: defend Title I funding for the schools serving Montana’s highest-need kids, and oppose federal voucher and tax-credit schemes that route public money to private schools with no accountability to the families paying for it.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

✓ Keep federal education dollars in public schools: defend Title I funding for the schools serving Montana’s highest-need kids, and oppose federal voucher and tax-credit schemes that route public money to private schools with no accountability to the families paying for it.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 20 more statements from Alani Bankhead
Income & wages

✓ Fund Social Security for good by removing the wage cap so the wealthiest pay in on all their income: enough to keep the program solvent in perpetuity and to support family caregivers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Retirement security and Social Security

Candidate campaign source

✓ Fund Social Security for good by removing the wage cap so the wealthiest pay in on all their income: enough to keep the program solvent in perpetuity and to support family caregivers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ No federal tax breaks, subsidies, grants, or loans for these companies, and I’ll push Montana to end its own giveaway too. Some of the richest firms on earth do not need a handout from Montana.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

✓ No federal tax breaks, subsidies, grants, or loans for these companies, and I’ll push Montana to end its own giveaway too. Some of the richest firms on earth do not need a handout from Montana.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Expand real choice: help any Montanan who wants to add rooftop or community solar, battery storage, or EV charging through tax credits and low-cost financing, never mandates.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

✓ Expand real choice: help any Montanan who wants to add rooftop or community solar, battery storage, or EV charging through tax credits and low-cost financing, never mandates.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Tax breaks for builders who make at least 30% of their units genuinely affordable.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

✓ Tax breaks for builders who make at least 30% of their units genuinely affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Back the More Homes on the Market Act, bipartisan legislation that raises the home-sale capital-gains exclusion to $500k for single filers and $1M for couples, and indexes it to inflation, and expand the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to build the affordable homes Montana needs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

✓ Back the More Homes on the Market Act, bipartisan legislation that raises the home-sale capital-gains exclusion to $500k for single filers and $1M for couples, and indexes it to inflation, and expand the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to build the affordable homes Montana needs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

✓ Pay the people who do the work: federal compensation support so providers earn a living wage without pricing parents out.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

✓ Pay the people who do the work: federal compensation support so providers earn a living wage without pricing parents out.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Reward work in the tax code: expand the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit so a paycheck goes further for working families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

✓ Reward work in the tax code: expand the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit so a paycheck goes further for working families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Partner with the state on property-tax relief for Montanans living on Social Security.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Retirement security and Social Security

Candidate campaign source

✓ Partner with the state on property-tax relief for Montanans living on Social Security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

✓ Raise the federal minimum wage so a full-time job keeps a worker and their family out of poverty, and index it to inflation the way Montana already does, so the floor never sits frozen for fifteen years again.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

✓ Raise the federal minimum wage so a full-time job keeps a worker and their family out of poverty, and index it to inflation the way Montana already does, so the floor never sits frozen for fifteen years again.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Cap what families pay: limit child-care costs as a share of income, and make the Child & Dependent Care Tax Credit bigger and refundable so it actually reaches working families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

✓ Cap what families pay: limit child-care costs as a share of income, and make the Child & Dependent Care Tax Credit bigger and refundable so it actually reaches working families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Protect Head Start and restore the Child Tax Credit: fully fund Head Start and Early Head Start, and bring back an expanded Child Tax Credit so families have real breathing room.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

✓ Protect Head Start and restore the Child Tax Credit: fully fund Head Start and Early Head Start, and bring back an expanded Child Tax Credit so families have real breathing room.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Give the people who have to live with one of these the final say, not Washington and not the company: no federal permit, dollar, or tax break moves until the affected community, and any affected Tribe, has had an open public hearing and the full facts on water, power, and cost.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

✓ Give the people who have to live with one of these the final say, not Washington and not the company: no federal permit, dollar, or tax break moves until the affected community, and any affected Tribe, has had an open public hearing and the full facts on water, power, and cost.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Route clean-energy tax credits to Montanans: residents, co-ops, and communities capture the value, not just out-of-state hyperscalers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

✓ Route clean-energy tax credits to Montanans: residents, co-ops, and communities capture the value, not just out-of-state hyperscalers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

✓ Pair rising wages with lower costs, the housing, child-care, and everyday-cost fixes, so a raise is not eaten by rent.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

✓ Pair rising wages with lower costs, the housing, child-care, and everyday-cost fixes, so a raise is not eaten by rent.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Use tariffs against genuine cheating, dumping, illegal subsidies, and intellectual-property theft, and never as a blanket tax on everyday goods and our own trading partners.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

✓ Use tariffs against genuine cheating, dumping, illegal subsidies, and intellectual-property theft, and never as a blanket tax on everyday goods and our own trading partners.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Give the next generation a real shot at the land with a multi-year tax break for new farmers, and defend the right-to-repair wins in the new farm bill.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

✓ Give the next generation a real shot at the land with a multi-year tax break for new farmers, and defend the right-to-repair wins in the new farm bill.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Make polluters pay, not taxpayers: a federal royalty on hardrock mining plus a dedicated cleanup fund, and reinstate the full “polluter pays” Superfund taxes.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

✓ Make polluters pay, not taxpayers: a federal royalty on hardrock mining plus a dedicated cleanup fund, and reinstate the full “polluter pays” Superfund taxes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ End the federal tax on Social Security benefits (back the You Earned It, You Keep It Act), so a lifetime of work isn’t taxed twice.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Retirement security and Social Security

Candidate campaign source

✓ End the federal tax on Social Security benefits (back the You Earned It, You Keep It Act), so a lifetime of work isn’t taxed twice.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Income & wages

✓ Raise Direct Support Professional pay to a living wage by tying Medicaid reimbursement to the real cost of care.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

✓ Raise Direct Support Professional pay to a living wage by tying Medicaid reimbursement to the real cost of care.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

✓ Restore the ACA tax credits that just expired and doubled people’s premiums, add a public option you can choose, and close the Medicaid coverage gap.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

✓ Restore the ACA tax credits that just expired and doubled people’s premiums, add a public option you can choose, and close the Medicaid coverage gap.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Kurt Alme

2 statements

Republican · U.S. Senate · MT

Taxes & tax policy

As revenue director, led a reduction of nearly 40 percent in Montana's top income-tax rate.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Income Taxes

Candidate campaign source

As revenue director, led a reduction of nearly 40 percent in Montana's top income-tax rate.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kurt Alme campaign source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Kurt Alme
Taxes & tax policy

Prosecuted fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, and government-program fraud as an assistant U.S. attorney.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Financial Crime

Candidate campaign source

Prosecuted fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, and government-program fraud as an assistant U.S. attorney.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kurt Alme campaign source 3 ↗

Seth Bodnar

2 statements

Independent · U.S. Senate · MT

Taxes & tax policy

Targeted tax incentives for affordable and workforce housing development in rural and small-town Montana communities, where builders can't make the math work today

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Pillar One — Making The Montana Way of Life A Reality Again

Candidate campaign source

Targeted tax incentives for affordable and workforce housing development in rural and small-town Montana communities, where builders can't make the math work today

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Seth Bodnar campaign source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Seth Bodnar
Taxes & tax policy

Tie federal tax incentives—including depreciation and corporate tax benefits— directly to whether a facility strictly meets its ratepayer protection obligations.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Pillar One — Making The Montana Way of Life A Reality Again

Candidate campaign source

Tie federal tax incentives—including depreciation and corporate tax benefits— directly to whether a facility strictly meets its ratepayer protection obligations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Seth Bodnar campaign source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Montana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Montana incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Montana legislators and Montana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Montana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 4 Montana incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Courtenay Sprunger

Montana House of Representatives, District 7 · R–MT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Courtenay Sprunger
Montana Legislature · HB 351

AN ACT CLARIFYING THE POINT OF TAXATION FOR GASOLINE AND SPECIAL FUELS TAXES TO THE FIRST LICENSED DISTRIBUTOR WHO OWNS THE GASOLINE OR SPECIAL FUEL AS IT IS WITHDRAWN FROM A TERMINAL OR REFINERY IN THIS STATE OR IMPORTED INTO THIS STATE; REVISING DEFINITIONS; AMENDING SECTIONS 15-70-401, 15-70-402, 15-70-403, 15-70-404, AND 15-70-441, MCA; AND PROVIDING A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE

May 5, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 445

Rep. Courtenay Sprunger · Sponsored / Rep. Ed Byrne · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Smith · Co-sponsored / Sen. Denley Loge · Co-sponsored / Sen. Mike Yakawich · Co-sponsored / Rep. Steve Fitzpatrick · Co-sponsored / Rep. Denise Baum · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Carter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Julie Darling · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 351 clarifies who is treated as distributing fuel for Montana fuel-tax purposes. For withdrawal from an in-state refinery or pipeline terminal, it generally identifies the owner immediately before withdrawal; if shipped or delivered to a licensed distributor, it identifies the first licensed distributor taking possession as shown by the bill of lading. Imports are generally attributed to the owner when unloaded after arrival and coming to rest in Montana, excluding refinery or pipeline-terminal storage. If that owner is unlicensed and a licensed distributor ships or delivers the fuel, the licensed distributor is responsible. Fuel may not be exchanged tax-free between licensed distributors more than once. The law specifies July 1, 2026 and retains the existing gasoline tax rate. This concerns collection responsibility in one state within the Rocky Mountain price region, not a rate increase, tax holiday or demonstrated consumer savings.

The legislative docket records “Signed by Governor” and chapter 445. The displayed date is the docket timestamp, not an independently verified original execution date. Enactment does not prove implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The EIA fact is a five-state Rocky Mountain regional proxy covering Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming, not a Montana-only price. Rules identifying the distributor liable for gasoline tax concern a price component in one of those states. They do not establish a tax-rate change or consumer savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Montana evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(4) (a) Except as provided in subsection (4)(b), when gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is withdrawn from a refinery or pipeline terminal in this state, the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is considered to be distributed by the distributor who is the owner of the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel prior to the time of withdrawal. (b) If gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is withdrawn for shipment or delivery to a licensed distributor, it is considered to be distributed by the first licensed distributor to take possession of the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel as shown by the bill of lading issued by the terminal or refinery. (5) Imported gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel, except for gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel placed in storage at a refinery or pipeline terminal, is considered to be distributed after it arrives and is brought to rest in this state by the person who is the owner of the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel at the time the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is unloaded from its shipping vessel. If the owner is not licensed as a Montana distributor and if the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is shipped or delivered in this state by a person who is licensed as a distributor, then the gasoline, special fuel, or aviation fuel is considered to be distributed by the licensed distributor. (6) For the purposes of the tax provided for in this section, gasoline, special fuel, and aviation fuel may not be exchanged tax-free between licensed distributors more than one time.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Kelly Kortum

Montana House of Representatives, District 64 · D–MT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kelly Kortum
Montana Legislature · HB 484

Revise minimum wage laws to provide increases

May 20, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Kelly Kortum · Sponsored / Sen. Sara Novak · Co-sponsored / Rep. James Reavis · Co-sponsored / Rep. Luke Muszkiewicz · Co-sponsored / Rep. Becky Edwards · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jamie Isaly · Co-sponsored / Rep. Marc Lee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Peter Strand · Co-sponsored / Rep. Brian Close · Co-sponsored / Rep. Pete Elverum · Co-sponsored / Sen. Cora Neumann · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jane Weber · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jade Sooktis · Co-sponsored / Rep. Scott Rosenzweig · Co-sponsored / Sen. Willis Curdy · Co-sponsored / Sen. Mary Ann Dunwell · Co-sponsored / Sen. Janet Ellis · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Matthews · Co-sponsored / Sen. Susan Webber · Co-sponsored / Sen. Dave Fern · Co-sponsored / Sen. Derek Harvey · Co-sponsored / Sen. Laura Smith · Co-sponsored / Sen. Jonathan Windy Boy · Co-sponsored / Rep. Denise Baum · Co-sponsored / Rep. Bob Carter · Co-sponsored / Sen. Pat Flowers · Co-sponsored / Rep. Donavon Hawk · Co-sponsored / Sen. Denise Hayman · Co-sponsored / Sen. Emma Kerr-Carpenter · Co-sponsored / Sen. Shane Morigeau · Co-sponsored / Sen. Andrea Olsen · Co-sponsored / Sen. Christopher Pope · Co-sponsored / Rep. Denise Joy · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

As introduced, HB 484 proposed a $12.06 hourly minimum, or the federal minimum if higher, retaining annual cost-of-living adjustments and excluding tips and a training wage from the calculation. It proposed removing the $4 rate for businesses with annual gross sales of $110,000 or less, with a July 1, 2025 effective date. It died in process and did not become law. These were proposed wage rules, not a change to actual Montana pay or median household income.

The legislative docket records “Died in Process.” The displayed date is the docket timestamp. This proposal did not become law.

Why this record is included

Household money income includes wages before taxes. Minimum-wage proposals and settlement of unpaid wages concern that income component, without establishing a change in statewide median household income. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Montana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. Section 39-3-409, MCA, is amended to read: "39-3-409. Adoption of minimum wage rates -- exception. (1) The minimum wage, except as provided in subsection (3), must be the greater of either: (a) the minimum hourly wage rate as provided under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)), excluding the value of tips received by the employee and the special provisions for a training wage; or (b) $12.06 an hour, excluding the value of tips received by the employee and the special provisions for a training wage. (2) (a) The minimum wage is subject to a cost-of-living adjustment, as provided in subsection (2)(b). (b) No later than September 30 of each year, an adjustment of the wage amount specified in subsection (1) must be made based upon the increase, if any, from August of the preceding year to August of the year in which the calculation is made in the consumer price index, U.S. city average, all urban consumers, for all items, as published by the bureau of labor statistics of the United States department of labor. (c) The wage amount established under this subsection (2): (i) must be rounded to the nearest 5 cents; and (ii) becomes effective as the new minimum wage, replacing the dollar figure specified in subsection (1), on January 1 of the following year. " NEW SECTION. Section 2. Effective date. [This act] is effective July 1, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Andrea Olsen

Montana Senate, District 48 · D–MT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Andrea Olsen
Montana Legislature · SB 531

Provide tax credit for purchase of a firearm safe

May 23, 2025 · Not enacted

Sen. Andrea Olsen · Sponsored / Sen. Sara Novak · Co-sponsored / Sen. Cora Neumann · Co-sponsored / Sen. Willis Curdy · Co-sponsored / Sen. Mary Ann Dunwell · Co-sponsored / Sen. Janet Ellis · Co-sponsored / Sen. Jacinda Morigeau · Co-sponsored / Sen. Susan Webber · Co-sponsored / Sen. Jonathan Windy Boy · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ellie Boldman · Co-sponsored / Sen. Pat Flowers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Denise Hayman · Co-sponsored / Sen. Shane Morigeau · Co-sponsored / Sen. Christopher Pope · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

As introduced, SB 531 proposed a refundable individual income-tax credit equal to the purchase price of a qualifying firearm safe, capped at $300 per taxpayer per tax year and claimed in the year of purchase. A safe would have to meet the specified lock, boltwork, steel-construction and hinge-protection requirements and be certified by a nationally recognized testing laboratory as meeting Underwriters Laboratories residential security container rating standards. The proposal would have applied to income tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026. It died in process and did not establish a credit, a storage mandate or evidence that firearm deaths declined.

The legislative docket records “Died in Process.” The displayed date is the docket timestamp. This proposal did not become law.

Why this record is included

The CDC fact measures age-adjusted firearm deaths across intents. A proposed tax credit for firearm safes concerns secure storage and prevention policy. Safe purchases are not deaths, and the proposal does not demonstrate reduced mortality. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Montana evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

NEW SECTION. Section 1. Credit for purchase of firearm safe -- purpose. (1) There is a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for the purchase of a firearm safe. (2) The credit allowed under this section must be claimed in the tax year in which the firearm safe is purchased and is equal to the purchase price of the firearm safe. The credit may not exceed $300 a taxpayer in a tax year. (3) The credit must be refunded if the taxpayer has a tax liability less than the credit claimed. (4) To claim the credit, a firearm safe: (a) must be a secure and protective storage container for one or more firearms: (i) that fully contains a firearm and provides for its safe storage; (ii) that has a locking system consisting of a mechanical or electronic combination lock that has at least 10,000 possible combinations consisting of a minimum of three numbers, letters, or symbols. The lock must be protected by a case-hardened, drill-resistant steel plate or drill-resistant material of equivalent strength. (iii) with boltwork that consists of a minimum of three locking steel bolts of at least 1/2-inch thickness that intrude from the door of the safe into the body of the safe or from the body of the safe into the door of the safe and that are operated by a separate handle and secured by the lock; (iv) that is capable of repeated use. The exterior walls must be constructed of a minimum 12-gauge steel for a single-walled safe, or the sum of the steel walls must add up to at least one-tenth of an inch for safes with two walls. Doors must be constructed of a minimum of one layer of 7-gauge steel plate reinforced construction or at least two layers of a minimum of 12-gauge steel compound construction. (v) with door hinges that are protected to prevent the removal of the door. Protective features include but are not limited to hinges not exposed to the outside, interlocking door designs, dead bars, jeweler's lugs, and active or inactive locking bolts. (b) must fully contain the firearm, provide for secure storage, and be certified by a nationally recognized testing laboratory as meeting underwriters laboratories residential security container rating standards. (5) Pursuant to 5-4-104, the legislature finds that the purpose of the tax credit provided for in this section is to encourage the purchase of firearm safes to promote community and family safety.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Tim Sheehy

U.S. Senate, Montana · R–MT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Tim Sheehy
U.S. Congress · Montana delegation · S 2267

Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025

Jul 14, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Tim Sheehy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 2267 proposes a voluntary Labor Department self-audit program for employers to settle unpaid federal minimum wages and overtime. It excludes workers subject to the specified H-1B, H-2A, H-2B, Davis-Bacon or Service Contract Act prevailing-wage requirements. Employers must correct the identified practices, meet the stated litigation and investigation restrictions, and have no minimum-wage or overtime violation finding in the prior five years; repeat participation is limited to a distinct violation with proof the previous practice has stopped. Employees may decline and preserve their claims. Acceptance followed by full payment waives the employee’s private action under section 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, including liquidated damages, for the settled violations. The proposal limits review to employer-identified violations and bars discovery of submitted information in federal or state court without employer consent. For denied applications, it restricts use of submitted information, employee notification and reliance on the application to initiate an investigation, with a specified health-and-safety exception to that last restriction. Retaliation protection covers accepting or declining settlements. The bill remains in Congress and establishes no new wage payments or Montana income increase.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Household money income includes wages before taxes. Minimum-wage proposals and settlement of unpaid wages concern that income component, without establishing a change in statewide median household income. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Montana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Affected employeeThe term affected employee means an employee affected by a violation of a minimum wage or overtime hours requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), excluding any employee subject to prevailing wage requirements under the H–1B, H–2B, or H–2A visa programs, subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act), or chapter 67 of title 41, United States Code (commonly known as the Service Contract Act).(2)AdministratorThe term Administrator means the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor.(3)EmployeeThe term employee—(A)has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203); and(B)with respect to an employer, includes a former employee of such employer.(4)EmployerThe term employer has the meaning given such term in section 3 of such Act.(5)Good faithThe term good faith means, with respect to an employer applying for participation in the Payroll Audit Independent Determination program established under section 4, that such employer is not, at the time such employer submits an application for such program—(A)under investigation by the Secretary for an alleged violation of a minimum wage or overtime hours requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.); or(B)subject to a lawsuit related to an alleged violation of such a requirement.(6)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of Labor.(7)Self-auditThe term self-audit means an audit conducted by an employer to resolve inaccuracies by the employer in the computation of wages and overtime compensation required under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 within the statute of limitations described in section 6(a) of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255(a)).4.Payroll Audit Independent Determination program(a)Program establishmentThe Administrator shall establish a Payroll Audit Independent Determination program (referred to in this section as the program) to foster collaboration with employers that inadvertently violate the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) to voluntarily remedy, within the statute of limitations described in section 6(a) of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255(a)), unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.(b)Application requirements(1)Resources for compliance assistanceNot later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall make available to employers resources for assistance in complying with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, including content regarding wage and hour requirements, which shall be offered online, through printed materials, and through other outreach activities.(2)ApplicationAn employer seeking to participate in the program shall submit an application to the Administrator that includes—(A)materials related to and the results of a self-audit, including—(i)an identification of any practice of such employer identified in a self-audit that may violate a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; and(ii)a list of each employee who may be an affected employee with respect to such violation, including—(I)the period of time such employee would have been affected by such violation;(II)payroll records related to such employee for such period with information on the hours of work performed by such employee;(III)calculations of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to such employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 with a description of the methodology of such calculation and supporting evidence; and(IV)contact information for such employee;(B)an explanation of the scope of potential violations of a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of such Act for inclusion in a release of claims under subsection (d);(C)an assurance that any practice of such employer that violates a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that is identified in the self-audit has been corrected to comply with such Act;(D)an assurance that such employer has, prior to submitting such application, reviewed the compliance assistance resources made available under paragraph (1) and all program information, terms, and requirements;(E)an assurance that, on the date of submission of such application, such employer—(i)is not involved in any litigation regarding any practice of such employer that is identified in the self-audit; and(ii)has not received any communications from an employee or a representative of an employee seeking to litigate or settle claims related to any such practice; and(F)an assurance that no employee listed in subparagraph (A)(ii) is subject to a prevailing wage requirement under the H–1B, H–2B, or H–2A visa programs, subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act), or chapter 67 of title 41, United States Code (commonly known as the Service Contract Act).(c)Application review and approval(1)Review and amendmentThe Administrator shall review each application submitted by an employer under subsection (b)(2). As part of such review, the Administrator shall—(A)as necessary, consult with such employer regarding—(i)the self-audit and supporting materials submitted in the application; and(ii)the process for approval of such application and settlement of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.);(B)inform such employer in a timely manner and prior to a determination on the approval of the application if additional information is needed to assess the unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee for the violations of such Act identified in the application through the self-audit; and(C)provide such employer an opportunity to amend such application to revise the scope of the practices of such employer that violate a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that are identified in the application through self-audit, to update the list of affected employees with respect to the practices at issue in the self-audit, and to update the calculations of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee as a result of such violations.(2)Approval(A)In generalIf the conditions under subparagraph (B) are satisfied with respect to an application submitted under subsection (b)(2), the Administrator shall—(i)approve the application—(I)in the case the application has not been amended under paragraph (1)(C), not later than 30 days after such submission; or(II)in the case the application has been amended under paragraph (1)(C), not later than 30 days after the date of submission of such amended application; and(ii)supervise the settlement under subsection (d), including the payment of any unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) required through such settlement.(B)Conditions for approvalAn application submitted under subsection (b)(2) shall be approved under subparagraph (A) if—(i)within the scope of the violations identified by the employer through the application or an amendment to the application under paragraph (1)(C), the Administrator verifies that the self-audit and calculation of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 submitted in such application or amendment are accurate; and(ii)the employer submitting the application—(I)is determined to be acting in good faith regarding violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 identified in such application or amendment;(II)has not been found by the Administrator or any court of law to have violated a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of such Act during the 5 years immediately preceding submission of such application; and(III)has not been approved for participation in the program prior to the submission of such application, unless—(aa)such participation was for a distinct violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that the practice identified in the self-audit under subsection (b)(2); and(bb)such employer has submitted the necessary materials for the Administrator to verify that such employer is not engaging in the practice addressed by the previous participation of the employer in the program.(d)Settlement(1)In generalFor each employer that submits an application under subsection (b)(2) that is approved under subsection (c)(2), the Administrator shall—(A)provide to the employer a description of the scope of the potential release of claims for violations of minimum wage or overtime compensation requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) and a summary of any unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to each affected employee under such Act for such violations; and(B)issue a release form to each affected employee of such employer that describes the settlement terms, which shall include a written explanation of—(i)the waiver under paragraph (2)(B); and(ii)the right of the affected employee receiving the offer for settlement to decline the offer for settlement and preserve any private right of action of the employee to recover any unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to the employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as a result of such violations.(2)Acceptance of settlement(A)In generalAn affected employee offered a settlement through a release form under paragraph (1)(B) may accept or decline the offer.(B)Waiver of private right of actionThe acceptance by an affected employee of an offer of settlement under subparagraph (A) shall, upon payment in full of any amounts owed to the employee under the settlement, constitute a waiver by such employee of any right such employee may have under section 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216) to a private right of action to recover unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation, including any liquidated damages, for the violations addressed by the settlement.(3)Payment of settlementFor each affected employee that accepts a settlement through a release form under paragraph (1)(B), the employer shall—(A)pay such employee the full amount of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to such employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) for the violations addressed in the settlement; and(B)submit proof of payment of such full amount to the Administrator.(e)Additional requirements(1)DenialsIn the case of an application submitted by an employer under subsection (b)(2) and not approved under subsection (c)(2), the Administrator may not—(A)use information submitted in the application in an investigation against the employer;(B)use the fact such employer applied to the program as a basis for any future investigation, except in a case in which the Administrator has reason to believe that the health and safety of an employee is at risk due to an alleged violation related to a requirement enforced by the Secretary involving child labor, agricultural worker protections, or housing or transportation requirements under the H–2A or H–2B visa programs; or(C)communicate to any affected employee of such employer in response to receipt of such application to notify such employee of the private right of action of such employee to resolve potential violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), particularly with respect to the wage practices at issue in the self-audit.(2)Expansion of scopeThe Administrator may not expand the scope of the violations to be investigated or settled through an employer’s participation in the program beyond the violations identified by the employer in the application submitted by the employer under subsection (b)(2) or the amended application submitted by the employer under subsection (c)(1)(C).(3)No payments requiredThe Administrator may not require any form of payment by an employer to apply, qualify, or participate in the program.(4)Exemption from discoveryAny information submitted in an application to the program under subsection (b)(2), or an amendment to such application under subsection (c)(1)(C), may not be subject to discovery in a Federal or State court proceeding without the consent of the employer that submitted the application.(f)RetaliationSection 15(a)(3) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 215(a)(3)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: , or has accepted or declined to accept an offer for settlement under section 4(d) of the Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Montana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Montana statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.