Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.
Median owner-occupied home value$375.8K2020–2024 · #17 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$1.08K2020–2024 · #33 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate69.2%2020–2024 · #18 of 50 · highest first
Montana over time
Explore Montana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Montana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Montana effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Montana change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Home-price growth since 2016 Montana · source units
MontanaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
2 of 2 reviewed Montana actions match · 2 date markers shown. 26 major events shown separately.
Montana · 2025: +106.7% · Rank #11 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Montana Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Montana · state comparison
Home values, rent, and homeownership
Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.
Montana · 2020–2024$375,800
Montana rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Median owner-occupied home value
Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.
2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · $375,8002020–2024 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$839,100
—
#2
California
$734,700
—
#3
Washington
$564,600
—
#4
Massachusetts
$562,100
—
#5
Colorado
$539,400
—
#6
Utah
$489,400
—
#7
Oregon
$477,600
—
#8
New Jersey
$454,400
—
#9
Nevada
$435,400
—
#10
New York
$423,800
—
#11
Maryland
$419,900
—
#12
Idaho
$418,600
—
#13
Rhode Island
$404,200
—
#14
New Hampshire
$402,500
—
#15
Arizona
$394,500
—
#16
Virginia
$383,700
—
#17
Montana · your comparison
$375,800
—
#18
Connecticut
$366,900
—
#19
Florida
$359,000
—
#20
Alaska
$352,900
—
#21
Delaware
$352,000
—
#22
Minnesota
$329,300
—
#23
Vermont
$316,600
—
#24
Wyoming
$309,700
—
#25
Georgia
$303,300
—
#26
Maine
$296,600
—
#27
North Carolina
$288,900
—
#28
Tennessee
$286,700
—
#29
Texas
$283,800
—
#30
Wisconsin
$266,500
—
#31
Illinois
$263,300
—
#32
South Carolina
$259,000
—
#33
South Dakota
$257,400
—
#34
Pennsylvania
$254,500
—
#35
North Dakota
$249,900
—
#36
New Mexico
$248,100
—
#37
Nebraska
$238,600
—
#38
Michigan
$231,600
—
#39
Missouri
$230,300
—
#40
Indiana
$218,200
—
#41
Kansas
$217,200
—
#42
Louisiana
$216,500
—
#43
Ohio
$214,800
—
#44
Alabama
$209,900
—
#45
Iowa
$208,000
—
#46
Kentucky
$205,600
—
#47
Oklahoma
$199,800
—
#48
Arkansas
$188,000
—
#49
Mississippi
$169,800
—
#50
West Virginia
$162,600
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.
This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.
Montana · 2020–202444.8%
Montana rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Renters · spending at least 30% of income
Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.
Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · 44.8%2020–2024 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Florida
60.1%
—
#2
Hawaii
56.7%
—
#3
Nevada
55.9%
—
#4
California
55.3%
—
#5
Louisiana
54.8%
—
#6
Colorado
52.9%
—
#7
Connecticut
52.6%
—
#8
Oregon
52.5%
—
#9
Georgia
52.4%
—
#10
South Carolina
52.1%
—
#11
New York
52.1%
—
#12
Massachusetts
51.8%
—
#13
Texas
51.7%
—
#14
New Jersey
51.6%
—
#15
Maryland
51.5%
—
#16
Arizona
51.4%
—
#17
Mississippi
51.3%
—
#18
Michigan
50.4%
—
#19
New Mexico
50.2%
—
#20
Washington
49.9%
—
#21
Delaware
49.6%
—
#22
North Carolina
48.9%
—
#23
West Virginia
48.9%
—
#24
Tennessee
48.8%
—
#25
Alabama
48.8%
—
#26
Virginia
48.5%
—
#27
Maine
48.4%
—
#28
Vermont
48.4%
—
#29
New Hampshire
48.2%
—
#30
Pennsylvania
48.2%
—
#31
Minnesota
48.1%
—
#32
Indiana
48.1%
—
#33
Rhode Island
48%
—
#34
Illinois
47.9%
—
#35
Utah
47.2%
—
#36
Idaho
46.9%
—
#37
Oklahoma
46.3%
—
#38
Ohio
45.9%
—
#39
Missouri
45.6%
—
#40
Kentucky
45.4%
—
#41
Nebraska
45.1%
—
#42
Arkansas
44.8%
—
#43
Montana · your comparison
44.8%
—
#44
Alaska
44.6%
—
#45
Iowa
43.9%
—
#46
Wisconsin
43.7%
—
#47
Kansas
43.5%
—
#48
Wyoming
43.1%
—
#49
South Dakota
39.8%
—
#50
North Dakota
38.9%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.
Montana · 2025+106.7%
Montana rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Home-price growth since 2016
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.
This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Montana
2025 · Montana: +106.7% · Rank #11 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Montana Home-price growth since 2016 history
Period
Montana
Compare
2016
+0%
2017
+5.2%
2018
+11.6%
2019
+17.5%
2020
+25.1%
2021
+49.8%
2022
+81.1%
2023
+91.8%
2024
+102.8%
2025
+106.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · +106.7%2025 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Idaho
+141.7%
—
#2
Florida
+114.5%
—
#3
Maine
+113.7%
—
#4
Utah
+113.6%
—
#5
Tennessee
+112.4%
—
#6
Arizona
+112.3%
—
#7
New Hampshire
+110.1%
—
#8
Rhode Island
+108%
—
#9
Georgia
+107.6%
—
#10
North Carolina
+107.1%
—
#11
Montana · your comparison
+106.7%
—
#12
Nevada
+106.1%
—
#13
South Carolina
+105.5%
—
#14
Washington
+100.2%
—
#15
Indiana
+94.5%
—
#16
Wisconsin
+94%
—
#17
Michigan
+93.7%
—
#18
Ohio
+93.3%
—
#19
Vermont
+92.6%
—
#20
New Jersey
+88.9%
—
#21
Missouri
+86.9%
—
#22
New York
+85.9%
—
#23
Nebraska
+84.6%
—
#24
Massachusetts
+84.3%
—
#24
South Dakota
+84.3%
—
#26
Texas
+83.3%
—
#27
Kentucky
+83.2%
—
#28
Colorado
+83.1%
—
#29
Kansas
+82.5%
—
#30
New Mexico
+82.3%
—
#31
Alabama
+81.3%
—
#32
Arkansas
+80.8%
—
#33
Connecticut
+79.8%
—
#34
Pennsylvania
+78.4%
—
#35
Virginia
+76.5%
—
#36
Delaware
+75.4%
—
#37
Oregon
+74.7%
—
#38
California
+72.7%
—
#39
Oklahoma
+71.9%
—
#40
Minnesota
+70%
—
#41
Wyoming
+69.3%
—
#42
Illinois
+65.3%
—
#43
Iowa
+64.2%
—
#44
Mississippi
+63.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
+63%
—
#46
Maryland
+59.4%
—
#47
West Virginia
+58.6%
—
#48
Alaska
+51.9%
—
#49
North Dakota
+45.9%
—
#50
Louisiana
+38.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.
Montana · 20255,258
Montana rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total housing units authorized
New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.
A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.
Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Montana · 5,2582025 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
210,217
—
#2
Florida
178,297
—
#3
California
103,856
—
#4
North Carolina
86,167
—
#5
Georgia
61,196
—
#6
Arizona
51,532
—
#7
South Carolina
45,862
—
#8
Tennessee
43,374
—
#9
New York
38,667
—
#10
Washington
34,913
—
#11
Colorado
33,754
—
#12
Ohio
33,640
—
#13
Virginia
33,094
—
#14
Indiana
29,076
—
#15
New Jersey
27,661
—
#16
Utah
26,775
—
#17
Pennsylvania
25,709
—
#18
Wisconsin
25,569
—
#19
Michigan
23,075
—
#20
Minnesota
20,947
—
#21
Alabama
19,061
—
#22
Illinois
18,551
—
#23
Nevada
18,540
—
#24
Idaho
17,944
—
#25
Missouri
17,474
—
#26
Oklahoma
15,513
—
#27
Arkansas
15,492
—
#28
Kentucky
14,940
—
#29
Oregon
14,839
—
#30
Louisiana
14,203
—
#31
Iowa
13,664
—
#32
Maryland
13,358
—
#33
Massachusetts
12,477
—
#34
Nebraska
10,596
—
#35
Kansas
10,299
—
#36
Mississippi
8,405
—
#37
New Mexico
7,747
—
#38
Connecticut
7,273
—
#39
Maine
6,979
—
#40
Delaware
6,468
—
#41
South Dakota
5,305
—
#42
Montana · your comparison
5,258
—
#43
New Hampshire
5,030
—
#44
West Virginia
3,962
—
#45
Hawaii
3,708
—
#46
North Dakota
2,440
—
#47
Vermont
2,294
—
#48
Wyoming
2,238
—
#49
Rhode Island
1,738
—
#50
Alaska
848
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
2 of 2 reviewed Montana actions · newest first
Jul 14, 2025 · S 2267 · Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025 · In CongressU.S. Congress · Montana delegation · S 2267
Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025
Jul 14, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Tim Sheehy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
S. 2267 proposes a voluntary Labor Department self-audit program for employers to settle unpaid federal minimum wages and overtime. It excludes workers subject to the specified H-1B, H-2A, H-2B, Davis-Bacon or Service Contract Act prevailing-wage requirements. Employers must correct the identified practices, meet the stated litigation and investigation restrictions, and have no minimum-wage or overtime violation finding in the prior five years; repeat participation is limited to a distinct violation with proof the previous practice has stopped. Employees may decline and preserve their claims. Acceptance followed by full payment waives the employee’s private action under section 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, including liquidated damages, for the settled violations. The proposal limits review to employer-identified violations and bars discovery of submitted information in federal or state court without employer consent. For denied applications, it restricts use of submitted information, employee notification and reliance on the application to initiate an investigation, with a specified health-and-safety exception to that last restriction. Retaliation protection covers accepting or declining settlements. The bill remains in Congress and establishes no new wage payments or Montana income increase.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Household money income includes wages before taxes. Minimum-wage proposals and settlement of unpaid wages concern that income component, without establishing a change in statewide median household income. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Montana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
3.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Affected employeeThe term affected employee means an employee affected by a violation of a minimum wage or overtime hours requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), excluding any employee subject to prevailing wage requirements under the H–1B, H–2B, or H–2A visa programs, subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act), or chapter 67 of title 41, United States Code (commonly known as the Service Contract Act).(2)AdministratorThe term Administrator means the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor.(3)EmployeeThe term employee—(A)has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203); and(B)with respect to an employer, includes a former employee of such employer.(4)EmployerThe term employer has the meaning given such term in section 3 of such Act.(5)Good faithThe term good faith means, with respect to an employer applying for participation in the Payroll Audit Independent Determination program established under section 4, that such employer is not, at the time such employer submits an application for such program—(A)under investigation by the Secretary for an alleged violation of a minimum wage or overtime hours requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.); or(B)subject to a lawsuit related to an alleged violation of such a requirement.(6)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of Labor.(7)Self-auditThe term self-audit means an audit conducted by an employer to resolve inaccuracies by the employer in the computation of wages and overtime compensation required under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 within the statute of limitations described in section 6(a) of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255(a)).4.Payroll Audit Independent Determination program(a)Program establishmentThe Administrator shall establish a Payroll Audit Independent Determination program (referred to in this section as the program) to foster collaboration with employers that inadvertently violate the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) to voluntarily remedy, within the statute of limitations described in section 6(a) of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255(a)), unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.(b)Application requirements(1)Resources for compliance assistanceNot later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall make available to employers resources for assistance in complying with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, including content regarding wage and hour requirements, which shall be offered online, through printed materials, and through other outreach activities.(2)ApplicationAn employer seeking to participate in the program shall submit an application to the Administrator that includes—(A)materials related to and the results of a self-audit, including—(i)an identification of any practice of such employer identified in a self-audit that may violate a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; and(ii)a list of each employee who may be an affected employee with respect to such violation, including—(I)the period of time such employee would have been affected by such violation;(II)payroll records related to such employee for such period with information on the hours of work performed by such employee;(III)calculations of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to such employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 with a description of the methodology of such calculation and supporting evidence; and(IV)contact information for such employee;(B)an explanation of the scope of potential violations of a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of such Act for inclusion in a release of claims under subsection (d);(C)an assurance that any practice of such employer that violates a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that is identified in the self-audit has been corrected to comply with such Act;(D)an assurance that such employer has, prior to submitting such application, reviewed the compliance assistance resources made available under paragraph (1) and all program information, terms, and requirements;(E)an assurance that, on the date of submission of such application, such employer—(i)is not involved in any litigation regarding any practice of such employer that is identified in the self-audit; and(ii)has not received any communications from an employee or a representative of an employee seeking to litigate or settle claims related to any such practice; and(F)an assurance that no employee listed in subparagraph (A)(ii) is subject to a prevailing wage requirement under the H–1B, H–2B, or H–2A visa programs, subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act), or chapter 67 of title 41, United States Code (commonly known as the Service Contract Act).(c)Application review and approval(1)Review and amendmentThe Administrator shall review each application submitted by an employer under subsection (b)(2). As part of such review, the Administrator shall—(A)as necessary, consult with such employer regarding—(i)the self-audit and supporting materials submitted in the application; and(ii)the process for approval of such application and settlement of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.);(B)inform such employer in a timely manner and prior to a determination on the approval of the application if additional information is needed to assess the unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee for the violations of such Act identified in the application through the self-audit; and(C)provide such employer an opportunity to amend such application to revise the scope of the practices of such employer that violate a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that are identified in the application through self-audit, to update the list of affected employees with respect to the practices at issue in the self-audit, and to update the calculations of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee as a result of such violations.(2)Approval(A)In generalIf the conditions under subparagraph (B) are satisfied with respect to an application submitted under subsection (b)(2), the Administrator shall—(i)approve the application—(I)in the case the application has not been amended under paragraph (1)(C), not later than 30 days after such submission; or(II)in the case the application has been amended under paragraph (1)(C), not later than 30 days after the date of submission of such amended application; and(ii)supervise the settlement under subsection (d), including the payment of any unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) required through such settlement.(B)Conditions for approvalAn application submitted under subsection (b)(2) shall be approved under subparagraph (A) if—(i)within the scope of the violations identified by the employer through the application or an amendment to the application under paragraph (1)(C), the Administrator verifies that the self-audit and calculation of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 submitted in such application or amendment are accurate; and(ii)the employer submitting the application—(I)is determined to be acting in good faith regarding violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 identified in such application or amendment;(II)has not been found by the Administrator or any court of law to have violated a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of such Act during the 5 years immediately preceding submission of such application; and(III)has not been approved for participation in the program prior to the submission of such application, unless—(aa)such participation was for a distinct violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that the practice identified in the self-audit under subsection (b)(2); and(bb)such employer has submitted the necessary materials for the Administrator to verify that such employer is not engaging in the practice addressed by the previous participation of the employer in the program.(d)Settlement(1)In generalFor each employer that submits an application under subsection (b)(2) that is approved under subsection (c)(2), the Administrator shall—(A)provide to the employer a description of the scope of the potential release of claims for violations of minimum wage or overtime compensation requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) and a summary of any unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to each affected employee under such Act for such violations; and(B)issue a release form to each affected employee of such employer that describes the settlement terms, which shall include a written explanation of—(i)the waiver under paragraph (2)(B); and(ii)the right of the affected employee receiving the offer for settlement to decline the offer for settlement and preserve any private right of action of the employee to recover any unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to the employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as a result of such violations.(2)Acceptance of settlement(A)In generalAn affected employee offered a settlement through a release form under paragraph (1)(B) may accept or decline the offer.(B)Waiver of private right of actionThe acceptance by an affected employee of an offer of settlement under subparagraph (A) shall, upon payment in full of any amounts owed to the employee under the settlement, constitute a waiver by such employee of any right such employee may have under section 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216) to a private right of action to recover unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation, including any liquidated damages, for the violations addressed by the settlement.(3)Payment of settlementFor each affected employee that accepts a settlement through a release form under paragraph (1)(B), the employer shall—(A)pay such employee the full amount of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to such employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) for the violations addressed in the settlement; and(B)submit proof of payment of such full amount to the Administrator.(e)Additional requirements(1)DenialsIn the case of an application submitted by an employer under subsection (b)(2) and not approved under subsection (c)(2), the Administrator may not—(A)use information submitted in the application in an investigation against the employer;(B)use the fact such employer applied to the program as a basis for any future investigation, except in a case in which the Administrator has reason to believe that the health and safety of an employee is at risk due to an alleged violation related to a requirement enforced by the Secretary involving child labor, agricultural worker protections, or housing or transportation requirements under the H–2A or H–2B visa programs; or(C)communicate to any affected employee of such employer in response to receipt of such application to notify such employee of the private right of action of such employee to resolve potential violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), particularly with respect to the wage practices at issue in the self-audit.(2)Expansion of scopeThe Administrator may not expand the scope of the violations to be investigated or settled through an employer’s participation in the program beyond the violations identified by the employer in the application submitted by the employer under subsection (b)(2) or the amended application submitted by the employer under subsection (c)(1)(C).(3)No payments requiredThe Administrator may not require any form of payment by an employer to apply, qualify, or participate in the program.(4)Exemption from discoveryAny information submitted in an application to the program under subsection (b)(2), or an amendment to such application under subsection (c)(1)(C), may not be subject to discovery in a Federal or State court proceeding without the consent of the employer that submitted the application.(f)RetaliationSection 15(a)(3) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 215(a)(3)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: , or has accepted or declined to accept an offer for settlement under section 4(d) of the Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 14, 2022 · Executive Order No. 5-2022 · Executive Order No. 5-2022: Creating the Housing Advisory Council · IssuedGovernor · Executive Order No. 5-2022
Executive Order No. 5-2022: Creating the Housing Advisory Council
Jul 14, 2022 · Issued
Gov. Greg Gianforte · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Greg Gianforte’s Executive Order 5-2022 created a housing task force to recommend ways to increase affordable workforce housing supply, including construction workforce, land-use and zoning changes. It called for legislative recommendations by October 15, 2022 and regulatory recommendations by December 15, 2022, with an original July 1, 2023 termination unless renewed. The signed order is dated July 14, 2022, one day after the index date. It established an advisory process, not completed housing, enacted zoning reform or lower rents.
Original signed order and execution date independently verified. Later renewal, implementation and continuing effect are not established by this relationship.
Why this record is included
Median gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Recommendations on affordable workforce housing supply concern rental affordability as well as ownership; creating an advisory council does not build homes or set rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Montana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GREG GIANFORTE, Governor of the State of Montana, pursuant to the authority vested in me under the Constitution, Mont. Code Ann. § 2-15-122 and any other applicable statutes, do hereby authorize the creation of the Housing Advisory Council, also known as the Governor's Housing Task Force ("Task Force"), and order as follows: PURPOSE The Task Force shall provide the Governor with short- and long-term recommendations and strategies for the State of Montana to increase the supply of affordable, attainable workforce housing. In developing recommendations and strategies, the Task Force shall seek input from Montana citizens, members of the Montana Legislature, Montana associations whose members are impacted by housing policy, advisory groups and researchers focused on housing policy, and other appropriate stakeholders as determined by the Task Force. COMPOSITION The Task Force shall consist of up to 30 members who shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of'the Governor. The Director of the Department of Environmental Quality shall serve as the presiding officer of the Task Force. 2 Task Force members shall include, but not be limited to, persons from the following categories: • members or staff of professional associations representing business, industry, and workers; • state agency directors, or their designees, including from the Department of Environmental Quality, the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, the Department of Commerce, and the Department of Labor and Industry; • elected officials, including state legislators and leaders from local jurisdictions; • members of state boards, councils, and commissions; • subject matter experts and researchers; and • stakeholders. The Department of Environmental Quality shall provide administrative support for the Task Force. Given the diverse composition of the Task Force, meetings may be conducted in person throughout the state and/or remotely as determined by the presiding officer. REPORT By October 15, 2022, the Task Force shall provide an initial written report to the Governor with recommendations and strategies to increase the supply of affordable, attainable workforce housing, specifically focusing on measures the Legislature could consider and the Governor could sign into law. By December 15, 2022, the Task Force shall provide an initial written report to the Governor with recommendations and strategies to increase the supply of affordable, attainable workforce housing, specifically focusing on regulatory changes and best practices that could be adopted by state agencies and local governments. The Task Force's reports shall identify federal, state, local, and other governmental policies, including but not limited to land use regulations and zoning restrictions, that inhibit increasing housing supply to meet demand. The Task Force's reports shall identify strategies and recommendations to increase the supply of affordable, attainable workforce housing - which state agencies may adopt through regulatory changes, the Legislature may enact into law, or local jurisdictions may adopt - for: • expanding the state's construction workforce; • reforming land use regulations; and • reforming zoning restrictions that prevent supply from increasing to meet demand. TERMINATION 3 The Task Force shall cease to exist on July 1, 2023, unless rescinded earlier or renewed by subsequent executive order. COMPENSATION Council Members shall be entitled to reasonable travel expense reimbursement under Mont. Code Ann.§ 2-15-122. THIS ORDER is effective immediately.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Montana officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Montana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
23 statements from 4 candidates
2026 Montana U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements
Every Montanan should be able to work a good-paying job that allows them to afford housing, healthcare, childcare, and a good retirement. That’s not the case anymore for so many Montanans, but it can be.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Retirement security and Social Security
Candidate campaign source
Every Montanan should be able to work a good-paying job that allows them to afford housing, healthcare, childcare, and a good retirement. That’s not the case anymore for so many Montanans, but it can be.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Right now in this country, we deal with basic needs like housing and healthcare the same way that we deal with forest management and wildfire – we wait until it’s an absolute crisis, and then we pay for it in the most expensive, least effective way possible. Whether that’s a 60 year-old woman sittin…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Right now in this country, we deal with basic needs like housing and healthcare the same way that we deal with forest management and wildfire – we wait until it’s an absolute crisis, and then we pay for it in the most expensive, least effective way possible. Whether that’s a 60 year-old woman sitting in the emergency room because she couldn’t afford a primary care visit, or a wildfire burning into a subdivision because our leaders lacked the courage to invest in our public lands up front. We can spend our resources more wisely and solve the biggest problems facing our country by taking action now.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
For so many of us in Montana, the cost of just living here has reached crisis levels – but we’ve solved crises like these before, and we can solve them again by investing in affordable housing & childcare, reforming our broken healthcare system, and making corporations and the ultra-rich carry their…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
For so many of us in Montana, the cost of just living here has reached crisis levels – but we’ve solved crises like these before, and we can solve them again by investing in affordable housing & childcare, reforming our broken healthcare system, and making corporations and the ultra-rich carry their own weight just like the rest of us. For years now, national leaders in both parties have left working people in Montana behind. It’s time for a new generation of leadership to step up and make Congress finally work for working people.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Increase property tax rates for corporate or large-volume private-equity landlords (this will require provisions that the increases are not passed through to individual renters)
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing
Candidate campaign source
Increase property tax rates for corporate or large-volume private-equity landlords (this will require provisions that the increases are not passed through to individual renters)
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Selling off public lands in Montana won’t solve the housing crisis, but it will certainly impede public access for recreational or hunting purposes, and severely limit grazing or leases often granted to Montana’s ranchers. It also makes very little sense for the government to sell off potential mine…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
Selling off public lands in Montana won’t solve the housing crisis, but it will certainly impede public access for recreational or hunting purposes, and severely limit grazing or leases often granted to Montana’s ranchers. It also makes very little sense for the government to sell off potential mineral rights (or explorable energy assets) associated with these large tracts of public lands.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
If elected as your Representative, I will champion an effort to build temporary housing adjacent to existing VA facilities to shelter our displaced Veterans for up to 6 to 12 months, during which an emphasis on mental and physical healthcare can be effectively supported. This may take the form of do…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
If elected as your Representative, I will champion an effort to build temporary housing adjacent to existing VA facilities to shelter our displaced Veterans for up to 6 to 12 months, during which an emphasis on mental and physical healthcare can be effectively supported. This may take the form of dormitories or barracks-style living, with an employed social worker assigned to each facility to provide additional assistance with job-training, available VA or federal benefits, and to help arrange for longer-term and independent housing.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The concept of “open borders” is not a good thing; the very high numbers of illegal immigrants in the U.S. place a significant economic burden upon our citizenry (think healthcare dollars for emergency care, consumption of resources and effects on housing).
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy
Candidate campaign source
The concept of “open borders” is not a good thing; the very high numbers of illegal immigrants in the U.S. place a significant economic burden upon our citizenry (think healthcare dollars for emergency care, consumption of resources and effects on housing).
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
✓ Back the More Homes on the Market Act, bipartisan legislation that raises the home-sale capital-gains exclusion to $500k for single filers and $1M for couples, and indexes it to inflation, and expand the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to build the affordable homes Montana needs.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing
Candidate campaign source
✓ Back the More Homes on the Market Act, bipartisan legislation that raises the home-sale capital-gains exclusion to $500k for single filers and $1M for couples, and indexes it to inflation, and expand the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to build the affordable homes Montana needs.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
✓ Improve tribal members’ access to housing, and protect tribal sovereignty over resource management, including buffalo and bison grazing on public lands.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities
Candidate campaign source
✓ Improve tribal members’ access to housing, and protect tribal sovereignty over resource management, including buffalo and bison grazing on public lands.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
✓ Restore fair-housing enforcement: bring back HUD’s investigators and the complaint process, so being turned away for your race, your kids, or a disability actually has consequences.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing
Candidate campaign source
✓ Restore fair-housing enforcement: bring back HUD’s investigators and the complaint process, so being turned away for your race, your kids, or a disability actually has consequences.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
✓ Rebuild the DOJ Civil Rights Division: fully staff the lawyers who enforce the anti-discrimination laws again, in jobs, housing, lending, schools, and at the ballot box.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Education
Candidate campaign source
✓ Rebuild the DOJ Civil Rights Division: fully staff the lawyers who enforce the anti-discrimination laws again, in jobs, housing, lending, schools, and at the ballot box.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Targeted tax incentives for affordable and workforce housing development in rural and small-town Montana communities, where builders can't make the math work today
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Pillar One — Making The Montana Way of Life A Reality Again
Candidate campaign source
Targeted tax incentives for affordable and workforce housing development in rural and small-town Montana communities, where builders can't make the math work today
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
Oppose tariffs on lumber, steel, and other building materials that make every new home cost more. These tariffs undercut the progress Congress just made. It makes no sense to pass big housing reform with one hand and raise the price of every 2x4 with the other.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Pillar One — Making The Montana Way of Life A Reality Again
Candidate campaign source
Oppose tariffs on lumber, steel, and other building materials that make every new home cost more. These tariffs undercut the progress Congress just made. It makes no sense to pass big housing reform with one hand and raise the price of every 2x4 with the other.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Montana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Montana incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Montana legislators and Montana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Montana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Montana incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.
Sen. Tim Sheehy
U.S. Senate, Montana · R–MT
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Tim SheehyU.S. Congress · Montana delegation · S 2267
Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025
Jul 14, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Tim Sheehy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
S. 2267 proposes a voluntary Labor Department self-audit program for employers to settle unpaid federal minimum wages and overtime. It excludes workers subject to the specified H-1B, H-2A, H-2B, Davis-Bacon or Service Contract Act prevailing-wage requirements. Employers must correct the identified practices, meet the stated litigation and investigation restrictions, and have no minimum-wage or overtime violation finding in the prior five years; repeat participation is limited to a distinct violation with proof the previous practice has stopped. Employees may decline and preserve their claims. Acceptance followed by full payment waives the employee’s private action under section 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, including liquidated damages, for the settled violations. The proposal limits review to employer-identified violations and bars discovery of submitted information in federal or state court without employer consent. For denied applications, it restricts use of submitted information, employee notification and reliance on the application to initiate an investigation, with a specified health-and-safety exception to that last restriction. Retaliation protection covers accepting or declining settlements. The bill remains in Congress and establishes no new wage payments or Montana income increase.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
Household money income includes wages before taxes. Minimum-wage proposals and settlement of unpaid wages concern that income component, without establishing a change in statewide median household income. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Montana evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
3.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Affected employeeThe term affected employee means an employee affected by a violation of a minimum wage or overtime hours requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), excluding any employee subject to prevailing wage requirements under the H–1B, H–2B, or H–2A visa programs, subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act), or chapter 67 of title 41, United States Code (commonly known as the Service Contract Act).(2)AdministratorThe term Administrator means the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor.(3)EmployeeThe term employee—(A)has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203); and(B)with respect to an employer, includes a former employee of such employer.(4)EmployerThe term employer has the meaning given such term in section 3 of such Act.(5)Good faithThe term good faith means, with respect to an employer applying for participation in the Payroll Audit Independent Determination program established under section 4, that such employer is not, at the time such employer submits an application for such program—(A)under investigation by the Secretary for an alleged violation of a minimum wage or overtime hours requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.); or(B)subject to a lawsuit related to an alleged violation of such a requirement.(6)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of Labor.(7)Self-auditThe term self-audit means an audit conducted by an employer to resolve inaccuracies by the employer in the computation of wages and overtime compensation required under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 within the statute of limitations described in section 6(a) of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255(a)).4.Payroll Audit Independent Determination program(a)Program establishmentThe Administrator shall establish a Payroll Audit Independent Determination program (referred to in this section as the program) to foster collaboration with employers that inadvertently violate the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) to voluntarily remedy, within the statute of limitations described in section 6(a) of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 (29 U.S.C. 255(a)), unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.(b)Application requirements(1)Resources for compliance assistanceNot later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall make available to employers resources for assistance in complying with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, including content regarding wage and hour requirements, which shall be offered online, through printed materials, and through other outreach activities.(2)ApplicationAn employer seeking to participate in the program shall submit an application to the Administrator that includes—(A)materials related to and the results of a self-audit, including—(i)an identification of any practice of such employer identified in a self-audit that may violate a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938; and(ii)a list of each employee who may be an affected employee with respect to such violation, including—(I)the period of time such employee would have been affected by such violation;(II)payroll records related to such employee for such period with information on the hours of work performed by such employee;(III)calculations of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to such employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 with a description of the methodology of such calculation and supporting evidence; and(IV)contact information for such employee;(B)an explanation of the scope of potential violations of a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of such Act for inclusion in a release of claims under subsection (d);(C)an assurance that any practice of such employer that violates a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that is identified in the self-audit has been corrected to comply with such Act;(D)an assurance that such employer has, prior to submitting such application, reviewed the compliance assistance resources made available under paragraph (1) and all program information, terms, and requirements;(E)an assurance that, on the date of submission of such application, such employer—(i)is not involved in any litigation regarding any practice of such employer that is identified in the self-audit; and(ii)has not received any communications from an employee or a representative of an employee seeking to litigate or settle claims related to any such practice; and(F)an assurance that no employee listed in subparagraph (A)(ii) is subject to a prevailing wage requirement under the H–1B, H–2B, or H–2A visa programs, subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Davis-Bacon Act), or chapter 67 of title 41, United States Code (commonly known as the Service Contract Act).(c)Application review and approval(1)Review and amendmentThe Administrator shall review each application submitted by an employer under subsection (b)(2). As part of such review, the Administrator shall—(A)as necessary, consult with such employer regarding—(i)the self-audit and supporting materials submitted in the application; and(ii)the process for approval of such application and settlement of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.);(B)inform such employer in a timely manner and prior to a determination on the approval of the application if additional information is needed to assess the unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee for the violations of such Act identified in the application through the self-audit; and(C)provide such employer an opportunity to amend such application to revise the scope of the practices of such employer that violate a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that are identified in the application through self-audit, to update the list of affected employees with respect to the practices at issue in the self-audit, and to update the calculations of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee as a result of such violations.(2)Approval(A)In generalIf the conditions under subparagraph (B) are satisfied with respect to an application submitted under subsection (b)(2), the Administrator shall—(i)approve the application—(I)in the case the application has not been amended under paragraph (1)(C), not later than 30 days after such submission; or(II)in the case the application has been amended under paragraph (1)(C), not later than 30 days after the date of submission of such amended application; and(ii)supervise the settlement under subsection (d), including the payment of any unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) required through such settlement.(B)Conditions for approvalAn application submitted under subsection (b)(2) shall be approved under subparagraph (A) if—(i)within the scope of the violations identified by the employer through the application or an amendment to the application under paragraph (1)(C), the Administrator verifies that the self-audit and calculation of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to any affected employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 submitted in such application or amendment are accurate; and(ii)the employer submitting the application—(I)is determined to be acting in good faith regarding violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 identified in such application or amendment;(II)has not been found by the Administrator or any court of law to have violated a minimum wage or overtime compensation requirement of such Act during the 5 years immediately preceding submission of such application; and(III)has not been approved for participation in the program prior to the submission of such application, unless—(aa)such participation was for a distinct violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that the practice identified in the self-audit under subsection (b)(2); and(bb)such employer has submitted the necessary materials for the Administrator to verify that such employer is not engaging in the practice addressed by the previous participation of the employer in the program.(d)Settlement(1)In generalFor each employer that submits an application under subsection (b)(2) that is approved under subsection (c)(2), the Administrator shall—(A)provide to the employer a description of the scope of the potential release of claims for violations of minimum wage or overtime compensation requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) and a summary of any unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to each affected employee under such Act for such violations; and(B)issue a release form to each affected employee of such employer that describes the settlement terms, which shall include a written explanation of—(i)the waiver under paragraph (2)(B); and(ii)the right of the affected employee receiving the offer for settlement to decline the offer for settlement and preserve any private right of action of the employee to recover any unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to the employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as a result of such violations.(2)Acceptance of settlement(A)In generalAn affected employee offered a settlement through a release form under paragraph (1)(B) may accept or decline the offer.(B)Waiver of private right of actionThe acceptance by an affected employee of an offer of settlement under subparagraph (A) shall, upon payment in full of any amounts owed to the employee under the settlement, constitute a waiver by such employee of any right such employee may have under section 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216) to a private right of action to recover unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation, including any liquidated damages, for the violations addressed by the settlement.(3)Payment of settlementFor each affected employee that accepts a settlement through a release form under paragraph (1)(B), the employer shall—(A)pay such employee the full amount of unpaid minimum wages or overtime compensation owed to such employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) for the violations addressed in the settlement; and(B)submit proof of payment of such full amount to the Administrator.(e)Additional requirements(1)DenialsIn the case of an application submitted by an employer under subsection (b)(2) and not approved under subsection (c)(2), the Administrator may not—(A)use information submitted in the application in an investigation against the employer;(B)use the fact such employer applied to the program as a basis for any future investigation, except in a case in which the Administrator has reason to believe that the health and safety of an employee is at risk due to an alleged violation related to a requirement enforced by the Secretary involving child labor, agricultural worker protections, or housing or transportation requirements under the H–2A or H–2B visa programs; or(C)communicate to any affected employee of such employer in response to receipt of such application to notify such employee of the private right of action of such employee to resolve potential violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), particularly with respect to the wage practices at issue in the self-audit.(2)Expansion of scopeThe Administrator may not expand the scope of the violations to be investigated or settled through an employer’s participation in the program beyond the violations identified by the employer in the application submitted by the employer under subsection (b)(2) or the amended application submitted by the employer under subsection (c)(1)(C).(3)No payments requiredThe Administrator may not require any form of payment by an employer to apply, qualify, or participate in the program.(4)Exemption from discoveryAny information submitted in an application to the program under subsection (b)(2), or an amendment to such application under subsection (c)(1)(C), may not be subject to discovery in a Federal or State court proceeding without the consent of the employer that submitted the application.(f)RetaliationSection 15(a)(3) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 215(a)(3)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: , or has accepted or declined to accept an offer for settlement under section 4(d) of the Ensuring Workers Get PAID Act of 2025.
Only current Montana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Montana statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Montana snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Montana, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.