Minnesota · individual fact

Minnesota real gross domestic product

Minnesota’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$392.31B2025 · #20 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth0.7%2025 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$515.12B2025 · #20 of 50 · highest first

Minnesota over time

Explore Minnesota readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Minnesota officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Minnesota effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Minnesota change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP Minnesota · source units
MinnesotaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $392.31B$0$13.39T$26.78TMinnesota, 2014: $338.62BMinnesota, 2015: $345.46BMinnesota, 2016: $350.6BMinnesota, 2017: $354.72BMinnesota, 2018: $364.73BMinnesota, 2019: $369.51BMinnesota, 2020: $357.07BMinnesota, 2021: $374.64BMinnesota, 2022: $382.88BMinnesota, 2023: $386.42BMinnesota, 2024: $389.59BMinnesota, 2025: $392.31B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 29National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● Minnesota Legislature · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.● U.S. Congress · Minnesota delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 1■ Minnesota agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

1 of 1 reviewed Minnesota actions match · 1 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.

Minnesota · 2025: $392.31B · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Minnesota Real GDP · source units
PeriodMinnesotaRankU.S. benchmark
2025$392.31B#20 of 50$23.94T
2024$389.59B#20 of 50$23.39T
2023$386.42B#20 of 50$22.72T
2022$382.88B#20 of 50$22.08T
2021$374.64B#20 of 50$21.56T
2020$357.07B#20 of 50$20.28T
2019$369.51B#19 of 50$20.72T
2018$364.73B#18 of 50$20.19T
2017$354.72B#18 of 50$19.61T
2016$350.6B#16 of 50$19.14T
2015$345.46B#16 of 50$18.8T
2014$338.62B#17 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Minnesota · state comparison

Minnesota output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

Minnesota · 2025$392.31B
Minnesota rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Minnesota
Real GDP history in Minnesota$-3.2T$12.14T$27.48T20142025
2025 · Minnesota: $392.31B · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Minnesota Real GDP history
PeriodMinnesotaCompare
2014$338.62B
2015$345.46B
2016$350.6B
2017$354.72B
2018$364.73B
2019$369.51B
2020$357.07B
2021$374.64B
2022$382.88B
2023$386.42B
2024$389.59B
2025$392.31B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Minnesota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Minnesota has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Minnesota · $392.31B2025 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Minnesota with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota · your comparison$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Minnesota · state comparison

What makes up Minnesota GDP?

Choose an industry to compare Minnesota’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

Minnesota · 2025$8.01B
Minnesota rank#8among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Minnesota
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in Minnesota$-39.36B$148.76B$336.88B20142025
2025 · Minnesota: $8.01B · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Minnesota Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodMinnesotaCompare
2014$7.27B
2015$6.26B
2016$5.06B
2017$5.68B
2018$5.39B
2019$4.05B
2020$5.19B
2021$8.33B
2022$12.08B
2023$9.11B
2024$7.34B
2025$8.01B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Minnesota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Minnesota has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Minnesota · $8.01B2025 · Rank #8 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Minnesota with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota · your comparison$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Minnesota · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

Minnesota · 20253,914,167
Minnesota rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Minnesota
Total employment · jobs history in Minnesota-28,603,337110,964,684250,532,70520142025
2025 · Minnesota: 3,914,167 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Minnesota Total employment · jobs history
PeriodMinnesotaCompare
20143,604,668
20153,664,048
20163,699,831
20173,738,228
20183,780,814
20193,787,728
20203,614,400
20213,719,761
20223,809,669
20233,863,215
20243,898,901
20253,914,167

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Minnesota stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Minnesota has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Minnesota · 3,914,1672025 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Minnesota with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota · your comparison3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Minnesota candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

7 statements from 5 candidates

2026 Minnesota Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Amy Klobuchar

1 statement

Democratic-Farmer-Labor · Governor · MN

Economic growth & production context

Increase markets for rural businesses. Partner with manufacturers, medical employers, and other businesses across Greater Minnesota to help them expand markets and grow. Work with the U.S. Small Business Administration, the federal Foreign Commercial Service, the Minnesota Trade Office (MTO) within …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Expand rural Minnesota businesses.

Candidate campaign source

Increase markets for rural businesses. Partner with manufacturers, medical employers, and other businesses across Greater Minnesota to help them expand markets and grow. Work with the U.S. Small Business Administration, the federal Foreign Commercial Service, the Minnesota Trade Office (MTO) within the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), and the IRRRB, to open new domestic and international markets for rural businesses and recruit new businesses in Greater Minnesota. This builds on Senator Klobuchar’s bipartisan legislative work with Senator John Hoeven (R-ND) to help small-town and rural businesses reach international markets and grow exports.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amy Klobuchar — candidate-owned primary source 15 ↗

2026 Minnesota U.S. House — District 5 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

DeVelle L. Jackson

2 statements

Independent · U.S. House District 5 · MN

Economic growth & production context

Housing must be part of complete economic development, not built in isolation from opportunity. I will pursue mixed-use, transit-oriented growth around Lake Street, West Bank, Franklin, Nicollet Mall, Hennepin Ave, and other important corridors by connecting housing with jobs, storefronts, reliable …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Women's Privacy & Protection

Candidate campaign source

Housing must be part of complete economic development, not built in isolation from opportunity. I will pursue mixed-use, transit-oriented growth around Lake Street, West Bank, Franklin, Nicollet Mall, Hennepin Ave, and other important corridors by connecting housing with jobs, storefronts, reliable transit, walkability, public space, and community services. Through legislation, federal grants, appropriations, and Community Project Funding, I will fight to bring Minnesota projects the support needed to expand supply, strengthen unions and local businesses, renew downtown and neighborhood corridors, and keep more of the value created here working for the people who live here, with measurable results in housing, hiring, business growth, and occupied storefronts.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

DeVelle L. Jackson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from DeVelle L. Jackson
Economic growth & production context

Affordability requires more than helping people pay for what remains scarce. When supply does not grow, additional assistance can meet the same shortage without bringing prices down. Direct relief should be paired with investment that builds more housing, domestic production, trained workers, small-…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Women's Privacy & Protection

Candidate campaign source

Affordability requires more than helping people pay for what remains scarce. When supply does not grow, additional assistance can meet the same shortage without bringing prices down. Direct relief should be paired with investment that builds more housing, domestic production, trained workers, small-business space, and essential services. The goal is greater supply, stronger competition, more jobs, and lower pressure on household costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

DeVelle L. Jackson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Minnesota U.S. House — District 8 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Pete Stauber

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 8 · MN

Economic growth & production context

Robust job growth, incomes rising, and prices dropping. We have a ways to go to totally recover from Joe Biden’s disastrous economic policies but Pete Stauber if helping clean up the mess! Pete helped champion historic tax relief, now law, which is causing wages to rise and increasing take home pay …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Issues

Candidate campaign source

Robust job growth, incomes rising, and prices dropping. We have a ways to go to totally recover from Joe Biden’s disastrous economic policies but Pete Stauber if helping clean up the mess! Pete helped champion historic tax relief, now law, which is causing wages to rise and increasing take home pay for working families, while putting thousands of dollars back in the pockets of every taxpayer. Pete is working tirelessly to reduce the reckless spending and, while it won’t happen overnight due to Biden’s 40-year high inflation that caused prices to skyrocket, lower the cost of living for all Minnesotans. President Trump and Pete are enacting America First policies that will spur economic growth, get our Main Street businesses going again, and make the cost of living affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Pete Stauber campaign source 2 ↗

Trina Swanson

1 statement

Democratic-Farmer-Labor · U.S. House District 8 · MN

Economic growth & production context

I also know that upholding treaty rights means protecting the clean water that sustains these resources, such as manoomin, fish, and wildlife. I will also support new opportunities for Tribal economic development, food sovereignty, broadband, and infrastructure.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: The Seven Ojibwe Nations in the 8th District are sovereign and self-governing. They deserve a representative who works with them, not around them.

Candidate campaign source

I also know that upholding treaty rights means protecting the clean water that sustains these resources, such as manoomin, fish, and wildlife. I will also support new opportunities for Tribal economic development, food sovereignty, broadband, and infrastructure.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Trina Swanson — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Minnesota candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Minnesota incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Minnesota legislators and Minnesota’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Minnesota’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

0 matching sponsorships or proposals · 0 Minnesota incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

No retained proposals match these filters. A missing record does not mean an incumbent has taken no action.

What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Minnesota officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Minnesota statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.