Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price24.29¢/kWh2024 · #8 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$4.023/gal2026-08 · #18 of 48* · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$133.62024 · #27 of 50 · highest first
Maine over time
Explore Maine readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Maine officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Maine effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Maine change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Maine · source units
MainePublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
4 of 4 reviewed Maine actions match · 4 date markers shown. 49 major events shown separately.
Maine · 2024: 24.29¢/kWh · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Maine, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. Maine's 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources; it is dominated by wood and wood-derived fuels and also includes other biomass, petroleum, and miscellaneous generation. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Maine Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Maine · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Maine · 202424.29¢/kWh
Maine rank#8among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Maine, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. Maine's 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources; it is dominated by wood and wood-derived fuels and also includes other biomass, petroleum, and miscellaneous generation. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Maine
2024 · Maine: 24.29¢/kWh · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Maine Residential electricity price history
Period
Maine
Compare
2015
15.61¢/kWh
2016
15.83¢/kWh
2017
15.97¢/kWh
2018
16.84¢/kWh
2019
17.89¢/kWh
2020
16.81¢/kWh
2021
17.02¢/kWh
2022
22.44¢/kWh
2023
27.42¢/kWh
2024
24.29¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · 24.29¢/kWh2024 · Rank #8 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine · your comparison
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations in EIA's New England region, including taxes. The region contains Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent EIA observations
Prior week
$4.096/gal
Weekly change
+9.3¢
One year earlier
$3.110/gal
Change from one year earlier
+107.9¢
Method and limitations
FactVote uses EIA's New England series, the smallest current EIA retail region that includes Maine. Changes are calculated from the published August 31, 2026 (prior week), and September 8, 2025 (52 weeks earlier), observations.
EIA does not publish a current Maine statewide weekly gasoline-price series. This New England regional estimate should not be read as Maine's statewide average.
The regional average combines Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont, and does not represent the price at every station or in every Maine community.
Prices are nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns. Weekly estimates can be revised and can differ from monthly averages.
Price changes alone do not establish the effect of any bill, official, or government action.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Maine · 2024$133.6
Maine rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Maine
2024 · Maine: $133.6 · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Maine Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Maine
Compare
2010
$81.83
2011
$80.09
2012
$77.77
2013
$79.13
2014
$83.91
2015
$86.75
2016
$86.48
2017
$87.21
2018
$96.33
2019
$100.53
2020
$95.77
2021
$99.44
2022
$130.78
2023
$153.56
2024
$133.6
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · $133.62024 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine · your comparison
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Maine · 202415.7 TWh
Maine rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Maine, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. Hydroelectric combines conventional and pumped-storage net generation. Maine's 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported sources; it is dominated by wood and wood-derived fuels and also includes other biomass, petroleum, and miscellaneous generation. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Maine
2024 · Maine: 15.7 TWh · Rank #45 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Maine Total electricity generation history
Period
Maine
Compare
2015
11.7 TWh
2016
11.5 TWh
2017
11.3 TWh
2018
11.3 TWh
2019
10.5 TWh
2020
10 TWh
2021
10.9 TWh
2022
12.8 TWh
2023
12.5 TWh
2024
15.7 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · 15.7 TWh2024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine · your comparison
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Maine · 20241,748.6 min/year
Maine rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Maine
2024 · Maine: 1,748.6 min/year · Rank #2 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Maine Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Maine
Compare
2023
1,863 min/year
2024
1,748.6 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · 1,748.6 min/year2024 · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine · your comparison
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Maine · 202480.5 trillion Btu
Maine rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · 80.5 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine · your comparison
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Maine · 202415.99 Mt CO₂
Maine rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · 15.99 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine · your comparison
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
4 of 4 reviewed Maine actions · newest first
Apr 3, 2026 · LD 2203 · An Act to Limit Rates Charged to Low-income Electricity Consumers · SignedGovernor · LD 2203
An Act to Limit Rates Charged to Low-income Electricity Consumers
Apr 3, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Janet T. Mills · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Janet Mills signed LD 2203. LD 2203 bars competitive electricity providers from charging customers receiving low-income assistance a generation-service rate above the standard-offer rate that would otherwise apply. It authorizes commission rules, including sharing customer-assistance information between utilities and providers. The cap is limited to the covered customers and generation service. Melanie Sachs reported this committee bill; that role is not individual sponsorship.
Law chapter 640, approved 2026-04-03. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across sectors. Limits on competitive-provider rates for customers receiving low-income assistance concern a narrow price component, not all customers or a demonstrated statewide price reduction. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. 35-A MRSA §3203, sub-§4-D is enacted to read: 4-D. Low-income assistance program; rate limitation. A competitive electricity provider may not provide to a customer receiving low-income assistance authorized by section 3214, subsection 2 generation service at a rate that is greater than the standard-offer service rate established under section 3212 that would otherwise be applicable to that customer. The commission may adopt rules to implement this subsection, including, but not limited to, rules governing the sharing of low-income assistance customer data by a transmission and distribution utility with a competitive electricity provider. Rules adopted under this subsection are routine technical rules as defined in Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 2‑A.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 3, 2026 · LD 2203 · An Act to Limit Rates Charged to Low-income Electricity Consumers · Enacted · Chapter 640Maine Legislature · LD 2203
An Act to Limit Rates Charged to Low-income Electricity Consumers
Apr 3, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 640
Rep. Melanie Sachs · Reported for committee
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 2203 bars competitive electricity providers from charging customers receiving low-income assistance a generation-service rate above the standard-offer rate that would otherwise apply. It authorizes commission rules, including sharing customer-assistance information between utilities and providers. The cap is limited to the covered customers and generation service. Melanie Sachs reported this committee bill; that role is not individual sponsorship.
Law chapter 640, approved 2026-04-03. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across sectors. Limits on competitive-provider rates for customers receiving low-income assistance concern a narrow price component, not all customers or a demonstrated statewide price reduction. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. 35-A MRSA §3203, sub-§4-D is enacted to read: 4-D. Low-income assistance program; rate limitation. A competitive electricity provider may not provide to a customer receiving low-income assistance authorized by section 3214, subsection 2 generation service at a rate that is greater than the standard-offer service rate established under section 3212 that would otherwise be applicable to that customer. The commission may adopt rules to implement this subsection, including, but not limited to, rules governing the sharing of low-income assistance customer data by a transmission and distribution utility with a competitive electricity provider. Rules adopted under this subsection are routine technical rules as defined in Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 2‑A.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 21, 2024 · Executive Order 8 FY23/24 · Maine Infrastructure Rebuilding and Resilience Commission · electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions · Issued · historical policy contextGovernor · Executive Order 8 FY23/24
Maine Infrastructure Rebuilding and Resilience Commission · electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions
May 21, 2024 · Issued · historical policy context
Gov. Janet Mills · Issued
Reviewed Maine original order · selected provisions
Governor Janet Mills issued Executive Order 8 on May 21, 2024 to establish a commission advising on storm recovery, rebuilding and long-term infrastructure resilience. Its tasks include funding gaps, insurance, partnerships, permitting, design, workforce capacity and state/local response. The Energy Office and an electrical utility have seats in infrastructure planning. The contemporaneous signing announcement explicitly describes improving energy-system resilience. Neither the order nor that planning announcement sets electricity prices or proves grid upgrades or fewer outages. The commission must examine use and limits of federal, state, municipal and private resources, recommend near-term funding-gap solutions and longer-term financing, encourage public/private partnerships and learn from recovery activities. It prepares an infrastructure plan and builds on relevant Maine Climate Council recommendations. These are planning and recommendation duties. The order lists 24 seats, including nine agency officials or designees and fifteen outside representatives, with two co-chairs appointed by the governor. The Governor’s Office of Policy Innovation and the Future provides necessary staff and may seek other agency/private support. Co-chairs and members serve without compensation. Co-chairs schedule and run meetings; subcommittees are permitted. The cited Freedom of Access Act exclusions coexist with qualified public accessibility. An interim report is due November 15, 2024 and a final report no later than May 15, 2025, to the governor and Legislature. Those deadlines do not establish the content or adoption of later reports. The 60-million-dollar storm-recovery appropriation described in the recitals belongs to separate legislation. This order does not appropriate that money or establish grants actually paid. The damage estimate spans the December 2023 and January 2024 storms; it is not a January-only expenditure or a measured loss of real GDP. Historical issuance and event context. A commission’s recommendations do not enact a law, establish an entitlement or prove spending, report adoption or measured outcomes. Later reports, amendments, legal authorities and actual implementation need separate review. The chart does not isolate a causal effect on Maine readings.
Historical issuance and event context. A commission’s recommendations do not enact a law, establish an entitlement or prove spending, report adoption or measured outcomes. Later reports, amendments, legal authorities and actual implementation need separate review. The chart does not isolate a causal effect on Maine readings.
Why this record is included
Governor Janet Mills issued Executive Order 8 on May 21, 2024 to establish a commission advising on storm recovery, rebuilding and long-term infrastructure resilience. Its tasks include funding gaps, insurance, partnerships, permitting, design, workforce capacity and state/local response. The Energy Office and an electrical utility have seats in infrastructure planning. The contemporaneous signing announcement explicitly describes improving energy-system resilience. Neither the order nor that planning announcement sets electricity prices or proves grid upgrades or fewer outages. The commission must examine use and limits of federal, state, municipal and private resources, recommend near-term funding-gap solutions and longer-term financing, encourage public/private partnerships and learn from recovery activities. It prepares an infrastructure plan and builds on relevant Maine Climate Council recommendations. These are planning and recommendation duties. The order lists 24 seats, including nine agency officials or designees and fifteen outside representatives, with two co-chairs appointed by the governor. The Governor’s Office of Policy Innovation and the Future provides necessary staff and may seek other agency/private support. Co-chairs and members serve without compensation. Co-chairs schedule and run meetings; subcommittees are permitted. The cited Freedom of Access Act exclusions coexist with qualified public accessibility. An interim report is due November 15, 2024 and a final report no later than May 15, 2025, to the governor and Legislature. Those deadlines do not establish the content or adoption of later reports. The 60-million-dollar storm-recovery appropriation described in the recitals belongs to separate legislation. This order does not appropriate that money or establish grants actually paid. The damage estimate spans the December 2023 and January 2024 storms; it is not a January-only expenditure or a measured loss of real GDP. Historical issuance and event context. A commission’s recommendations do not enact a law, establish an entitlement or prove spending, report adoption or measured outcomes. Later reports, amendments, legal authorities and actual implementation need separate review. The chart does not isolate a causal effect on Maine readings.
Retained Maine evidence context: budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt · reviewed Maine policy context · unemployment, jobs and workforce issues · reviewed Maine policy context · housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs · reviewed Maine policy context · electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions · reviewed Maine policy context · GDP, economic growth and production · reviewed Maine policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
A representative of one of Maine’s electrical utilities
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 2, 2023 · LD 1093 · An Act to Create a Seasonal Gas Tax Exemption and Rate · Not enactedMaine Legislature · LD 1093
An Act to Create a Seasonal Gas Tax Exemption and Rate
May 2, 2023 · Not enacted
Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingham · Sponsored / Rep. William Pluecker · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tracy Quint · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 1093 proposed exempting covered motor fuel from Maine excise tax annually from Thanksgiving Day until May 1 and imposing a 40-cent-per-gallon rate during the rest of the year. Jet and turbojet fuel would retain a 3.4-cent rate. The proposal received an ought-not-to-pass disposition on May 2, 2023 and did not become law. It establishes neither a tax holiday nor savings at the pump, and Maine is only part of the New England price region.
Ought Not to Pass Pursuant To Joint Rule 310, May 2, 2023 The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact is a New England regional regular-gasoline price proxy, not a Maine-only price. Maine fuel-tax changes concern one component in one of the region’s six states, without establishing a regional price change or consumer savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: 2 Sec. 1. 36 MRSA §2903, sub-§1, as amended by PL 2019, c. 379, Pt. B, §7, is 3 repealed and the following enacted in its place: 4 1. Excise tax imposed. Any fuel containing at least 10% internal combustion engine 5 fuel is subject to the tax imposed by this section. 6 A. An excise tax is imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this 7 State, including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, at the rate of 8 40.0¢ per gallon. 9 B. Notwithstanding paragraph A and except as provided in paragraph C, an excise tax 10 may not be imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this State, 11 including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, from 12:00 a.m. on 12 Thanksgiving Day until the following 12:00 a.m. on May 1st. 13 C. An excise tax is imposed at a rate of 3.4¢ per gallon on internal combustion engine 14 fuel bought or used for the purpose of propelling jet or turbojet engine aircraft.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Maine officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Maine candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
24 statements from 7 candidates
2026 Maine Governor — General Election
4 candidates with matching statements · 20 statements
Target support to Moderate and Low-Income Households: Expand heat pump, energy efficiency, and local solar programs that reduce costs and ensure the benefits of clean energy reach every Mainer.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
Target support to Moderate and Low-Income Households: Expand heat pump, energy efficiency, and local solar programs that reduce costs and ensure the benefits of clean energy reach every Mainer.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Lower Bills by Holding Utilities Accountable: Tie utility profits to lower bills, better performance, and customer satisfaction. Require the PUC to penalize poor service, reject unjustified rate hikes, and demand fair, transparent budgets that put Maine people over profits — including holding CMP, V…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
Lower Bills by Holding Utilities Accountable: Tie utility profits to lower bills, better performance, and customer satisfaction. Require the PUC to penalize poor service, reject unjustified rate hikes, and demand fair, transparent budgets that put Maine people over profits — including holding CMP, Versant Power, and their corporate parent Avangrid accountable. Drive down electricity costs: Direct the PUC to use every available tool to reduce bills — incentivizing utilities when rates go down, not up; facilitating electrification and efficiency; maximizing use of existing grid infrastructure; and ensuring modernization investments use the lowest-cost financing available. Target relief for low- and moderate-income households: Expand heat pump, home efficiency, heating assistance, and community solar programs so the benefits of clean energy reach every Mainer and lower costs for all households, especially those who need it most. Read Hannah’s full Energy and Climate Plan here.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Mainers deserve clean, reliable, and affordable power, not endless rate hikes and excuses. Hannah will hold utilities accountable and put Maine people — not corporate profits — first. She will expand homegrown clean energy, and make sure the transition to a clean economy lowers costs for families an…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology and communications
Candidate campaign source
Mainers deserve clean, reliable, and affordable power, not endless rate hikes and excuses. Hannah will hold utilities accountable and put Maine people — not corporate profits — first. She will expand homegrown clean energy, and make sure the transition to a clean economy lowers costs for families and businesses while creating good-paying jobs for Maine workers. She’ll protect Maine ratepayers from reckless AI data centers that threaten to drive up costs for our communities. Electricity is a basic necessity, not a luxury — and Hannah will make sure Mainers can count on reliable, affordable and increasingly cleaner power for their homes and businesses.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Enforce Guardrails Against AI Data Center Impacts & Costs: Speculative, power-hungry data center projects are looming across the country, and too often households are left paying the price – through higher electricity bills. Maine must enact a moratorium until we can ensure any new data centers pay …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology and communications
Candidate campaign source
Enforce Guardrails Against AI Data Center Impacts & Costs: Speculative, power-hungry data center projects are looming across the country, and too often households are left paying the price – through higher electricity bills. Maine must enact a moratorium until we can ensure any new data centers pay their own way up front, offer benefits to host communities, and do not jeopardize the environment, health and wellbeing of their neighbors.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
By partnering with unions, employers, and education institutions, Hannah will expand access to ongoing education and training that matches the jobs driving Maine’s economy today and tomorrow. These programs will promote flexible, hands-on learning for workers at all stages, prioritizing credentials,…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
By partnering with unions, employers, and education institutions, Hannah will expand access to ongoing education and training that matches the jobs driving Maine’s economy today and tomorrow. These programs will promote flexible, hands-on learning for workers at all stages, prioritizing credentials, apprenticeships, and real-world experience in key sectors like construction, health care, manufacturing, and clean energy.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Modernize Clean Energy Permitting: Remove unnecessary red tape and reform outdated processes to get more clean energy built and connected faster to lower electricity costs, while ensuring community benefits.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
Modernize Clean Energy Permitting: Remove unnecessary red tape and reform outdated processes to get more clean energy built and connected faster to lower electricity costs, while ensuring community benefits.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Clean Technology and Energy: Maine’s clean energy economy is already the fastest growing in New England. Hannah will reinvigorate Maine’s leadership in next-generation clean tech, investing in technologies that can lower energy costs and grow new jobs and the institutions and businesses driving adop…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Technology and communications
Candidate campaign source
Clean Technology and Energy: Maine’s clean energy economy is already the fastest growing in New England. Hannah will reinvigorate Maine’s leadership in next-generation clean tech, investing in technologies that can lower energy costs and grow new jobs and the institutions and businesses driving adoption of these technologies.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Hold Polluters Accountable: Champion a Maine Climate Superfund Act so fossil fuel companies pay for the damages they caused, not Maine taxpayers. Require full manufacturer disclosure and responsibility for cleanup of toxic PFAS, continuing Hannah’s long record of protecting public health and holding…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
Hold Polluters Accountable: Champion a Maine Climate Superfund Act so fossil fuel companies pay for the damages they caused, not Maine taxpayers. Require full manufacturer disclosure and responsibility for cleanup of toxic PFAS, continuing Hannah’s long record of protecting public health and holding chemical companies accountable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Deliver 100% Clean Energy: Deliver 100% clean energy by 2040, reducing reliance on costly imported fossil fuels, investing in responsibly sited clean energy that benefits communities, and using regular competitive auctions to rapidly deploy local solar, wind, and energy storage that lowers costs for…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
Deliver 100% Clean Energy: Deliver 100% clean energy by 2040, reducing reliance on costly imported fossil fuels, investing in responsibly sited clean energy that benefits communities, and using regular competitive auctions to rapidly deploy local solar, wind, and energy storage that lowers costs for Maine people and businesses. Maine must pursue a “least cost” electricity supply through reform and modernization of the standard offer and other procurement processes.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Invest in the Clean Energy Workforce: Grow programs that create pathways to good-paying green jobs, expand apprenticeships and training opportunities, and open up clean energy careers to more Mainers.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
Invest in the Clean Energy Workforce: Grow programs that create pathways to good-paying green jobs, expand apprenticeships and training opportunities, and open up clean energy careers to more Mainers.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Maine can’t wait for Washington to act — and under Hannah Pingree’s leadership, we won’t. Hannah believes the fight against climate change starts in our communities. As governor, she will invest in local climate solutions and ensure Maine remains a national model for climate action, storm preparedne…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
Maine can’t wait for Washington to act — and under Hannah Pingree’s leadership, we won’t. Hannah believes the fight against climate change starts in our communities. As governor, she will invest in local climate solutions and ensure Maine remains a national model for climate action, storm preparedness and recovery, and community resilience. Her leadership means action on the ground and Mainers can count on stronger infrastructure, lower costs, healthier communities, and a future built to withstand the storms ahead.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Giant wind turbines are both an eyesore and a threat to wildlife. New technologies such as bladeless, are being developed that are far less visually and environmentally intrusive. Vertical wind turbines can also be an excellent supplement to solar panels on a small scale. I support properly sited, e…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
Giant wind turbines are both an eyesore and a threat to wildlife. New technologies such as bladeless, are being developed that are far less visually and environmentally intrusive. Vertical wind turbines can also be an excellent supplement to solar panels on a small scale. I support properly sited, environmentally safe wind power. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/mar/16/good-vibrations-bladeless-turbines-could-bring-wind-power-to-your-home
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The construction of hydroelectric dams has caused great environmental and economic harm by destroying wildlife habitat and blocking fish passage. I support removing the four lower dams on the Kennebec River given their relatively small contribution to the supply of electricity and the potential econ…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
The construction of hydroelectric dams has caused great environmental and economic harm by destroying wildlife habitat and blocking fish passage. I support removing the four lower dams on the Kennebec River given their relatively small contribution to the supply of electricity and the potential economic and environmental benefits of a free flowing river. I support removing or bypassing other hydroelectric dams as appropriate. I support installation of dam free kinetic hydropower facilities where they are suitable and create little or no environmental harm. https://blog.ansi.org/ansi/tidal-power-turbines-in-east-river/
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I supported the Pine Tree Power referendum to purchase Central Maine Power and Versant. https://www.maine.gov/meopa/electricity/utilities I still support purchasing these two entities and forming a customer owned non-profit. https://ctmirror.org/2023/11/11/maine-public-power-company-referendum-vote/
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Civil rights, democracy, and government accountability
Candidate campaign source
I supported the Pine Tree Power referendum to purchase Central Maine Power and Versant. https://www.maine.gov/meopa/electricity/utilities I still support purchasing these two entities and forming a customer owned non-profit. https://ctmirror.org/2023/11/11/maine-public-power-company-referendum-vote/
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
How many millions of dollars paid to these two companies by Maine residents are leaving Maine and going to Spain, Canada, and elsewhere? As governor, I will continue to support creation of a public, non-profit electric utility. Electricity is an absolute necessity for nearly all of the people of Mai…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy, environment, and working waterfronts
Candidate campaign source
How many millions of dollars paid to these two companies by Maine residents are leaving Maine and going to Spain, Canada, and elsewhere? As governor, I will continue to support creation of a public, non-profit electric utility. Electricity is an absolute necessity for nearly all of the people of Maine and we should not be at the mercy of for profit, foreign corporations. I will support energy conservation to decrease demand relative to supply. I will support expanding electrical generating capacity through renewable means and I will encourage consideration of small scale nuclear power generating facilities. Maine must keep abreast of constantly changing technologies for wind, water, solar and nuclear power production. Regarding solar generation, facilities should be sited where they will do the least environmental and economic harm. Parking lots, rooftops, brownfields, etc. should be preferred locations. They should not be installed where they destroy or render inaccessible, valuable farmland.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
#2. Lower energy costs for manufacturers and Maine’s heritage industries Too many businesses are being priced out of Maine because of the high cost of energy. As Governor, I will pursue negotiated industrial rate contracts tied to job creation and investment so Maine employers can stay competitive w…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Lowering Energy Costs
Candidate campaign source
#2. Lower energy costs for manufacturers and Maine’s heritage industries Too many businesses are being priced out of Maine because of the high cost of energy. As Governor, I will pursue negotiated industrial rate contracts tied to job creation and investment so Maine employers can stay competitive without shifting costs onto families and small businesses.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Too many Maine homes are leaky and not efficient. During our winters we feel it the most. The best way to save energy costs is to not use as much in the first place. As Governor, I will scale weatherization and energy-efficiency investments statewide so we can cut waste and lower monthly bills and m…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Cut the Costs Crushing Maine Families — Lowering Energy Costs
Candidate campaign source
Too many Maine homes are leaky and not efficient. During our winters we feel it the most. The best way to save energy costs is to not use as much in the first place. As Governor, I will scale weatherization and energy-efficiency investments statewide so we can cut waste and lower monthly bills and make your home more comfortable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Fisheries are an incredibly important part of Maine’s economy, heritage, and culture, and sustain entire communities along our coasts and beyond. From fighting to ensure our fishermen have access to working waterfronts to supporting the scientific research and stock assessments necessary to ensure a…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Supporting Maine Lobstermen
Government-published candidate material
Fisheries are an incredibly important part of Maine’s economy, heritage, and culture, and sustain entire communities along our coasts and beyond. From fighting to ensure our fishermen have access to working waterfronts to supporting the scientific research and stock assessments necessary to ensure accurate decision-making, I am working in Maine and DC to make our fisheries and coastal communities more sustainable in the face of numerous challenges, including climate change.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
We should embrace renewable energy technology where it is cost-effective and makes sense. Wind, hydropower, solar and nuclear are all examples of renewable energy that we should embrace. However, current technology will not allow those sources of energy to replace fossil fuels, and we should not dep…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Energy and the Economy
Candidate campaign source
We should embrace renewable energy technology where it is cost-effective and makes sense. Wind, hydropower, solar and nuclear are all examples of renewable energy that we should embrace. However, current technology will not allow those sources of energy to replace fossil fuels, and we should not deprive consumers of their energy choices. We must continue to develop renewable technologies so they are a cost-effective alternative to fossil fuels, but I will not support any efforts to mandate the energy sources that Mainers’ choose to power their vehicles or heat their homes.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Prices are rising fast, and thanks to the tariffs and the War in Iran, they’re not coming down. The Trump Tariffs are hitting families hard, and the uncertainty that follows is forcing people to change their plans. They’re not purchasing new vehicles or expanding businesses. Trump’s tariffs are even…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing, property taxes, and cost of living
Candidate campaign source
Prices are rising fast, and thanks to the tariffs and the War in Iran, they’re not coming down. The Trump Tariffs are hitting families hard, and the uncertainty that follows is forcing people to change their plans. They’re not purchasing new vehicles or expanding businesses. Trump’s tariffs are even changing how folks shop for groceries and making heating your own home unaffordable. And the War in Iran has kept gas prices sky high all year long. In Congress, I’ll fight for universal childcare, good-paying jobs, and a surge in affordable housing to help our neighbors manage a middle-class life again. And I’ll fight to lift Trump’s blanket tariffs and end his war of choice so families can afford to live in Maine.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Maine candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Maine incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Maine legislators and Maine’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Maine’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Maine incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingham
Maine House of Representatives, District 12 · R–ME
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Billy Bob FaulkinghamMaine Legislature · LD 1093
An Act to Create a Seasonal Gas Tax Exemption and Rate
May 2, 2023 · Not enacted
Rep. Billy Bob Faulkingham · Sponsored / Rep. William Pluecker · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tracy Quint · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 1093 proposed exempting covered motor fuel from Maine excise tax annually from Thanksgiving Day until May 1 and imposing a 40-cent-per-gallon rate during the rest of the year. Jet and turbojet fuel would retain a 3.4-cent rate. The proposal received an ought-not-to-pass disposition on May 2, 2023 and did not become law. It establishes neither a tax holiday nor savings at the pump, and Maine is only part of the New England price region.
Ought Not to Pass Pursuant To Joint Rule 310, May 2, 2023 The proposal did not become law.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact is a New England regional regular-gasoline price proxy, not a Maine-only price. Maine fuel-tax changes concern one component in one of the region’s six states, without establishing a regional price change or consumer savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows: 2 Sec. 1. 36 MRSA §2903, sub-§1, as amended by PL 2019, c. 379, Pt. B, §7, is 3 repealed and the following enacted in its place: 4 1. Excise tax imposed. Any fuel containing at least 10% internal combustion engine 5 fuel is subject to the tax imposed by this section. 6 A. An excise tax is imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this 7 State, including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, at the rate of 8 40.0¢ per gallon. 9 B. Notwithstanding paragraph A and except as provided in paragraph C, an excise tax 10 may not be imposed on internal combustion engine fuel used or sold in this State, 11 including sales to the State or a political subdivision of the State, from 12:00 a.m. on 12 Thanksgiving Day until the following 12:00 a.m. on May 1st. 13 C. An excise tax is imposed at a rate of 3.4¢ per gallon on internal combustion engine 14 fuel bought or used for the purpose of propelling jet or turbojet engine aircraft.
Only current Maine officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Maine statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Maine snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Maine, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.