Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Maine public-safety context.
Reported violent-crime rate102.6 per 100k2024 · #50 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,156.7 per 100k2024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99.4%2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first
Maine over time
Explore Maine readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Maine officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Maine effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Maine change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Reported violent-crime rate Maine · source units
MainePublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
6 of 6 reviewed Maine actions match · 6 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.
Maine · 2024: 102.6 per 100k · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Maine's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.4% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Maine · state comparison
Reported crime over time
Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.
Maine · 2024102.6 per 100k
Maine rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Reported violent-crime rate
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Maine's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.4% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Maine
2024 · Maine: 102.6 per 100k · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Maine Reported violent-crime rate history
Period
Maine
Compare
2015
123.5 per 100k
2016
123.7 per 100k
2017
120.5 per 100k
2018
112.1 per 100k
2019
116.4 per 100k
2020
111 per 100k
2021
113.7 per 100k
2022
106 per 100k
2023
104.5 per 100k
2024
102.6 per 100k
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · 102.6 per 100k2024 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Mexico
744.7 per 100k
—
#2
Alaska
731.9 per 100k
—
#3
Tennessee
604.3 per 100k
—
#4
Arkansas
589.6 per 100k
—
#5*
Louisiana
504.5 per 100k
82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6
Colorado
486.8 per 100k
—
#7
California
478.4 per 100k
—
#8
Kansas
474.7 per 100k
—
#9
Missouri
472.7 per 100k
—
#10
Michigan
442.6 per 100k
—
#11
South Carolina
440.8 per 100k
—
#12
Arizona
433 per 100k
—
#13
Oklahoma
429.3 per 100k
—
#14
Montana
428 per 100k
—
#15
Maryland
425.9 per 100k
—
#16
Nevada
408.6 per 100k
—
#17
Texas
397.8 per 100k
—
#18
New York
392.2 per 100k
—
#19
North Carolina
382.9 per 100k
—
#20
Alabama
380.8 per 100k
—
#21
Delaware
368.4 per 100k
—
#22*
South Dakota
356.9 per 100k
89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*
Indiana
349.2 per 100k
87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24
Oregon
341.1 per 100k
—
#25
Washington
331.8 per 100k
—
#26
Georgia
328 per 100k
—
#27
Massachusetts
317.9 per 100k
—
#28
Ohio
311.9 per 100k
—
#29
Illinois
294.5 per 100k
—
#30
Wisconsin
287.6 per 100k
—
#31
West Virginia
263.8 per 100k
—
#32*
Florida
262 per 100k
81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33
Minnesota
259.4 per 100k
—
#34
North Dakota
258 per 100k
—
#35
Pennsylvania
251.3 per 100k
—
#36
Iowa
247.2 per 100k
—
#37
Utah
237.8 per 100k
—
#38
Idaho
236.6 per 100k
—
#39
Hawaii
230.3 per 100k
—
#40
Vermont
227.1 per 100k
—
#41
Kentucky
226.7 per 100k
—
#42
Nebraska
224.6 per 100k
—
#43
Virginia
223.7 per 100k
—
#44
New Jersey
221.9 per 100k
—
#45*
Mississippi
219.6 per 100k
65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*
Wyoming
212.5 per 100k
89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47
Rhode Island
154.9 per 100k
—
#48
Connecticut
139.2 per 100k
—
#49
New Hampshire
112.3 per 100k
—
#50
Maine · your comparison
102.6 per 100k
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for the calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Maine's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.4% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.4%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for the calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.
These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
Maine's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 99.4% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.4%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.
Maine · 2024181
Maine rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Firearm deaths
Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.
Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maine stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maine has a dark outline.
Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maine · 1812024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maine with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
4,389
—
#2
Florida
3,191
—
#3
California
2,853
—
#4
Georgia
1,985
—
#5
North Carolina
1,835
—
#6
Ohio
1,745
—
#7
Pennsylvania
1,624
—
#8
Illinois
1,563
—
#9
Tennessee
1,448
—
#10
Arizona
1,331
—
#11
Missouri
1,234
—
#12
Michigan
1,228
—
#13
Alabama
1,212
—
#14
Indiana
1,196
—
#15
Virginia
1,153
—
#16
South Carolina
1,064
—
#17
Louisiana
1,031
—
#18
Colorado
961
—
#19
Washington
915
—
#20
New York
896
—
#21
Kentucky
870
—
#22
Mississippi
810
—
#23
Oklahoma
794
—
#24
Wisconsin
735
—
#25
Maryland
716
—
#26
Oregon
663
—
#27
Arkansas
638
—
#28
Minnesota
582
—
#28
Nevada
582
—
#30
New Mexico
563
—
#31
Utah
454
—
#32
Kansas
446
—
#33
New Jersey
393
—
#34
Iowa
389
—
#35
Idaho
331
—
#36
Massachusetts
287
—
#37
West Virginia
281
—
#38
Montana
247
—
#39
Connecticut
224
—
#40
Nebraska
218
—
#41
Alaska
182
—
#42
Maine · your comparison
181
—
#43
South Dakota
159
—
#44
New Hampshire
152
—
#45
Wyoming
143
—
#46
Delaware
123
—
#47
North Dakota
95
—
#48
Vermont
76
—
#49
Hawaii
56
—
#50
Rhode Island
55
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
6 of 6 reviewed Maine actions · newest first
Apr 16, 2026 · LD 666 · An Act to Prevent Domestic Violence by Providing Adequate Funding Support for Court-ordered Certified Domestic Violence Intervention Programs · Enacted · Chapter 748Maine Legislature · LD 666
An Act to Prevent Domestic Violence by Providing Adequate Funding Support for Court-ordered Certified Domestic Violence Intervention Programs
Apr 16, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 748
Rep. Drew Gattine · Sponsored / Sen. Pinny H. Beebe-Center · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tavis Hasenfus · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nina Milliken · Co-sponsored / Sen. Chip Curry · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 666 provides a one-time $500,000 appropriation in fiscal 2026–27 for certified domestic violence intervention programs. It directs a $500,000 settlement-fund transfer by June 30, 2027 and reallocates existing indigent-participant fee reimbursement funding toward ongoing program funding. The relationship concerns intervention in domestic violence, including potentially fatal and aggravated-assault cases; it does not demonstrate program effectiveness or fewer deaths or offenses.
Law chapter 748, approved 2026-04-16. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The CDC fact counts age-adjusted resident homicide deaths. Court-ordered intervention programs concern prevention of domestic violence, including potentially fatal violence, a subset of homicides. Program funding is not a homicide count or evidence that deaths fell. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. Transfer of settlement funds. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the State Controller shall transfer $500,000 from the Administration - Attorney General, Other Special Revenue Funds account within the Department of the Attorney General from funds received from settlement agreements to the unappropriated surplus of the General Fund no later than June 30, 2027. Sec. 2. Reallocation of existing funds. Any existing funds allocated to the Department of Corrections, Office of Victim Services for the purpose of funding partial reimbursement of certified domestic violence intervention program indigent participant fees must be reallocated to similarly provide ongoing funding for certified domestic violence intervention programs. Sec. 3. Appropriations and allocations. The following appropriations and allocations are made. CORRECTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF Office of Victim Services 0046 Initiative: Provides one-time funding for certified domestic violence intervention programs. GENERAL FUND 2025-26 2026-27 All Other $0 $500,000 __________ __________ GENERAL FUND TOTAL $0 $500,000
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 16, 2026 · LD 666 · An Act to Prevent Domestic Violence by Providing Adequate Funding Support for Court-ordered Certified Domestic Violence Intervention Programs · SignedGovernor · LD 666
An Act to Prevent Domestic Violence by Providing Adequate Funding Support for Court-ordered Certified Domestic Violence Intervention Programs
Apr 16, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Janet T. Mills · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Janet Mills signed LD 666. LD 666 provides a one-time $500,000 appropriation in fiscal 2026–27 for certified domestic violence intervention programs. It directs a $500,000 settlement-fund transfer by June 30, 2027 and reallocates existing indigent-participant fee reimbursement funding toward ongoing program funding. The relationship concerns intervention in domestic violence, including potentially fatal and aggravated-assault cases; it does not demonstrate program effectiveness or fewer deaths or offenses.
Law chapter 748, approved 2026-04-16. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The CDC fact counts age-adjusted resident homicide deaths. Court-ordered intervention programs concern prevention of domestic violence, including potentially fatal violence, a subset of homicides. Program funding is not a homicide count or evidence that deaths fell. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. Transfer of settlement funds. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the State Controller shall transfer $500,000 from the Administration - Attorney General, Other Special Revenue Funds account within the Department of the Attorney General from funds received from settlement agreements to the unappropriated surplus of the General Fund no later than June 30, 2027. Sec. 2. Reallocation of existing funds. Any existing funds allocated to the Department of Corrections, Office of Victim Services for the purpose of funding partial reimbursement of certified domestic violence intervention program indigent participant fees must be reallocated to similarly provide ongoing funding for certified domestic violence intervention programs. Sec. 3. Appropriations and allocations. The following appropriations and allocations are made. CORRECTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF Office of Victim Services 0046 Initiative: Provides one-time funding for certified domestic violence intervention programs. GENERAL FUND 2025-26 2026-27 All Other $0 $500,000 __________ __________ GENERAL FUND TOTAL $0 $500,000
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 15, 2026 · LD 1773 · An Act to Criminalize Certain Offenses Related to Gift Card Thefts · Enacted · Chapter 714Maine Legislature · LD 1773
An Act to Criminalize Certain Offenses Related to Gift Card Thefts
Apr 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 714
Sen. Matt A. Harrington · Sponsored / Rep. Chad Perkins · Co-sponsored / Sen. Scott Cyrway · Co-sponsored / Rep. W. Crockett · Co-sponsored / Rep. Robert Nutting · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 1773 adds a definition of retail merchandise to Maine’s retail-theft statute. It covers products, goods and items of value displayed, held, stored or offered for retail sale, expressly including tangible property, gift cards, electronics and commodities. The final provision clarifies the property covered by the existing theft statute; it does not enact every offense in the original proposal or establish fewer thefts.
Law chapter 714, approved 2026-04-15. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
FBI property crime includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Defining retail merchandise, including gift cards, concerns a theft component rather than all property crimes or a demonstrated reduction in reported offenses. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. 17-A MRSA §363, sub-§2 is enacted to read: 2. As used in this section, "retail merchandise" means any product, good or other item of value that is displayed, held, stored or offered by a retailer for retail sale to consumers. "Retail merchandise" includes, but is not limited to, tangible personal property, gift cards, electronics and commodities.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 15, 2026 · LD 1773 · An Act to Criminalize Certain Offenses Related to Gift Card Thefts · SignedGovernor · LD 1773
An Act to Criminalize Certain Offenses Related to Gift Card Thefts
Apr 15, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Janet T. Mills · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Janet Mills signed LD 1773. LD 1773 adds a definition of retail merchandise to Maine’s retail-theft statute. It covers products, goods and items of value displayed, held, stored or offered for retail sale, expressly including tangible property, gift cards, electronics and commodities. The final provision clarifies the property covered by the existing theft statute; it does not enact every offense in the original proposal or establish fewer thefts.
Law chapter 714, approved 2026-04-15. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
FBI property crime includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Defining retail merchandise, including gift cards, concerns a theft component rather than all property crimes or a demonstrated reduction in reported offenses. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. 17-A MRSA §363, sub-§2 is enacted to read: 2. As used in this section, "retail merchandise" means any product, good or other item of value that is displayed, held, stored or offered by a retailer for retail sale to consumers. "Retail merchandise" includes, but is not limited to, tangible personal property, gift cards, electronics and commodities.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jan 11, 2026 · LD 1971 · An Act to Protect Workers in This State by Clarifying the Relationship of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies with Federal Immigration Authorities · Enacted · Chapter 517 · Without signatureMaine Legislature · LD 1971
An Act to Protect Workers in This State by Clarifying the Relationship of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies with Federal Immigration Authorities
Jan 11, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 517 · Without signature
Rep. Deqa Dhalac · Sponsored / Sen. Rachel Talbot Ross · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mana Abdi · Co-sponsored / Rep. Flavia DeBrito · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tavis Hasenfus · Co-sponsored / Rep. Adam Lee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Rafael Macias · Co-sponsored / Rep. Ambureen Rana · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eleanor Sato · Co-sponsored / Rep. Yusuf Yusuf · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 1971 limits state and local law enforcement use of money and personnel for federal civil immigration enforcement, detention based solely on hold requests and transfers without a court order or criminal warrant. It preserves specified information exchanges, criminal-law actions, qualifying joint task forces and other exceptions. Custodial consent, notice and recordkeeping rules also apply. It became law without the governor’s signature; enactment alone does not establish current enforceability or population effects.
Law chapter 517, became law without the governor’s signature 2026-01-11. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and noncitizens with many statuses. Limits on state and local involvement in federal immigration enforcement concern subsets of that population. Birthplace does not establish immigration status or criminal conduct. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§4762. Activities unaffected This chapter may not be construed to prohibit: 1. Exchanging information consistent with federal law. A law enforcement agency from sending to or requesting or receiving from an immigration authority information regarding the immigration status of a person or maintaining or exchanging that information with any other federal, state or local governmental entity under 8 United States Code, Section 1373 or 1644; or 2. Actions against person pursuant to certain criminal laws. A law enforcement agency from investigating, lawfully detaining, executing a criminal warrant or taking other action against a person pursuant to state criminal law or federal law as provided in section 4763, subsection 2. §4763. Prohibited activities 1. Prohibited activities. A law enforcement agency may not: A. Except as provided in subsection 2, use agency or department money or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, stop, arrest or search a person for immigration enforcement purposes, including: (1) Inquiring into a person's immigration status; (2) Detaining a person solely on the basis of a hold request; (3) Providing to immigration authorities information regarding the person's release date unless that information is available to the public; (4) Providing to immigration authorities personal information about the person, including the person's home address or work address; (5) Making or intentionally participating in an arrest based upon a hold request; (6) Assisting immigration authorities in activities described in 8 United States Code, Section 1357(a)(3); or Page 3 - 132LR0978(03) (7) Performing the functions of an immigration authority; B. Place a law enforcement officer under the supervision of a federal agency or employ a law enforcement officer deputized as a special federal officer or special federal deputy for immigration enforcement; C. Use an agent or employee of an immigration authority as an interpreter for local law enforcement agency matters regarding a person in the law enforcement agency's custody; or D. Transfer a person to an immigration authority unless authorized by a court order or criminal warrant. With the exception of willful or wanton misconduct, a law enforcement agency that acts in good faith compliance with this section in releasing a person subject to a hold request is immune from civil or criminal liability as a result of making the release. 2. Permitted activities. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 1, if an activity does not violate a policy of the law enforcement agency or a state or local law or policy of the jurisdiction in which the agency is operating, a law enforcement agency may: A. Investigate, take enforcement action against or detain a person upon reasonable suspicion of or arrest a person for a violation of 8 United States Code, Section 1326 that may be subject to the enhancement specified under 8 United States Code, Section 1326(b)(2) and that is detected during an unrelated law enforcement activity. A transfer to an immigration authority under this paragraph is permitted only if authorized by a court order or criminal warrant; B. Respond to a request from an immigration authority for information about a specific person's criminal history, including a previous criminal arrest or conviction or similar public criminal history record information accessed under Title 16, chapter 7, when otherwise permitted by state law; C. Conduct enforcement or investigative duties associated with a joint law enforcement task force, including the execution of a warrant or sharing of confidential information with a federal law enforcement agency or another law enforcement agency, for the purpose of a task force investigation, if: (1) The primary purpose of the joint law enforcement task force is not immigration enforcement; (2) The enforcement or investigative duties are primarily related to a violation of state or federal law, including but not limited to terrorism, drug trafficking or human trafficking; and (3) Participation in the task force by the law enforcement agency does not violate any state or local law or policy to which the agency is subject; D. Make an inquiry into information necessary to certify an individual identified as a potential crime or trafficking victim for a visa pursuant to 8 United States Code, Section 1101(a)(15)(T) or 1101(a)(15)(U) or to comply with 18 United States Code, Section 922(d)(5); or Page 4 - 132LR0978(03) E. Give an immigration authority access to interview an individual in the custody of the agency, as long as the immigration authority's interview request is supported by a valid court order. §4764. Duties of custodial law enforcement agencies A law enforcement agency shall, for an inmate in the agency's custody: 1. Written consent for voluntary interview. In advance of an interview between the inmate and an immigration authority regarding a civil immigration violation, provide the inmate with a written consent form that explains the purpose of the interview, that the interview is voluntary and that the inmate may decline the interview or be interviewed only with the inmate's attorney present. The consent form must be written in the primary language of the inmate and read to the inmate by a person who is not an immigration authority. This paragraph does not establish a right of counsel that otherwise does not exist in law; and 2. Notice of hold request. Upon receiving a hold request, provide a copy of the request to the inmate and inform the inmate that the law enforcement agency is prohibited under section 4763 from detaining an inmate based solely on the hold request. §4765. Records A law enforcement agency shall make reasonable efforts to retain for a period of 4 years a copy of a hold request and any other request along with any accompanying information or documentation provided by an immigration authority and information on the inmate subject to the hold request.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Nov 9, 2023 · Executive Order 4 FY23/24 · Independent commission on the Lewiston shooting · crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice · Issued · historical policy contextGovernor · Executive Order 4 FY23/24
Independent commission on the Lewiston shooting · crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice
Nov 9, 2023 · Issued · historical policy context
Gov. Janet Mills · Issued
Reviewed Maine original order · selected provisions
Governor Janet Mills issued Executive Order 4 on November 9, 2023 to establish a seven-member independent commission examining the October 25 Lewiston shooting, preceding circumstances and the police response. This is an independent public-safety inquiry, distinct from the criminal investigation. Its creation is not a finding about agency failures, a prosecution outcome or a measured change in Maine’s crime rate. The inquiry covers the perpetrator’s mental-health history, contacts with state, federal and military authorities, access to firearms, the initial police response and subsequent manhunt. The commission determines the scope of its fact-finding; this order does not change firearm-sale rules or impose a new criminal penalty. The Attorney General’s Office is requested to provide funding needed for staff or consultants; contracts must make them answer to the commission. The chair and members are uncompensated. The order specifies no dollar appropriation or actual expenditure. The chair controls meetings, agendas and scheduling; subcommittees are allowed. Records, proceedings and deliberations are excluded from the cited Freedom of Access Act requirements. Public accessibility is qualified by practicality and protection of fact-finding. A public report is required, with thoroughness balanced against timely answers; no fixed report deadline is stated. Historical issuance and event context. A commission’s recommendations do not enact a law, establish an entitlement or prove spending, report adoption or measured outcomes. Later reports, amendments, legal authorities and actual implementation need separate review. The chart does not isolate a causal effect on Maine readings.
Historical issuance and event context. A commission’s recommendations do not enact a law, establish an entitlement or prove spending, report adoption or measured outcomes. Later reports, amendments, legal authorities and actual implementation need separate review. The chart does not isolate a causal effect on Maine readings.
Why this record is included
Governor Janet Mills issued Executive Order 4 on November 9, 2023 to establish a seven-member independent commission examining the October 25 Lewiston shooting, preceding circumstances and the police response. This is an independent public-safety inquiry, distinct from the criminal investigation. Its creation is not a finding about agency failures, a prosecution outcome or a measured change in Maine’s crime rate. The inquiry covers the perpetrator’s mental-health history, contacts with state, federal and military authorities, access to firearms, the initial police response and subsequent manhunt. The commission determines the scope of its fact-finding; this order does not change firearm-sale rules or impose a new criminal penalty. The Attorney General’s Office is requested to provide funding needed for staff or consultants; contracts must make them answer to the commission. The chair and members are uncompensated. The order specifies no dollar appropriation or actual expenditure. The chair controls meetings, agendas and scheduling; subcommittees are allowed. Records, proceedings and deliberations are excluded from the cited Freedom of Access Act requirements. Public accessibility is qualified by practicality and protection of fact-finding. A public report is required, with thoroughness balanced against timely answers; no fixed report deadline is stated. Historical issuance and event context. A commission’s recommendations do not enact a law, establish an entitlement or prove spending, report adoption or measured outcomes. Later reports, amendments, legal authorities and actual implementation need separate review. The chart does not isolate a causal effect on Maine readings.
Retained Maine evidence context: crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice · reviewed Maine policy context · health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health · reviewed Maine policy context · budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt · reviewed Maine policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
the initial law enforcement response to the Lewiston shootings and the manhunt that ensued
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Maine officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Maine candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
4 statements from 3 candidates
2026 Maine Governor — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements
Maine is being overrun by drug cartels, and radical policy failures from Democratic leadership have enabled this crisis. As Governor, Bobby Charles will dismantle cartel networks operating inside and across our borders. He will strengthen law enforcement, increase support for addiction recovery and …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice
Candidate campaign source
Maine is being overrun by drug cartels, and radical policy failures from Democratic leadership have enabled this crisis. As Governor, Bobby Charles will dismantle cartel networks operating inside and across our borders. He will strengthen law enforcement, increase support for addiction recovery and mental health services, and ensure our communities are no longer losing loved ones to violence and overdose.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
No governor of a state should ever be put in the position of having to defend his/her/their state from the federal government. Unbelievably, that is the situation we are in. As governor, I will do everything in my power to protect ALL of the people of Maine from unlawful acts perpetrated by agents o…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice
Candidate campaign source
No governor of a state should ever be put in the position of having to defend his/her/their state from the federal government. Unbelievably, that is the situation we are in. As governor, I will do everything in my power to protect ALL of the people of Maine from unlawful acts perpetrated by agents of the federal government. This will include using the state police and the national guard, if necessary, to ensure public safety. Maine does not need and will not accept a single murder. Apparently, according to Donald Trump, the murder of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent was a “mistake”. Trump says ICE will sometimes ‘make mistakes’ In my opinion, the shooter should be prosecuted and given the maximum sentence. Also in my opinion, anyone else who encouraged or supported such actions should be prosecuted.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We must restore law and order in America. We need to ensure violent criminals serve their sentences, and provide law enforcement with the resources they need to keep our communities safe. First responders risk their lives every day to keep us safe, and they deserve our thanks and support, not a call…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reducing Crime & Supporting First Responders
Candidate campaign source
We must restore law and order in America. We need to ensure violent criminals serve their sentences, and provide law enforcement with the resources they need to keep our communities safe. First responders risk their lives every day to keep us safe, and they deserve our thanks and support, not a call to “defund the police.”
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Maine candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Maine incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Maine legislators and Maine’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Maine’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Maine incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Deqa Dhalac
Maine House of Representatives, District 120 · D–ME
An Act to Protect Workers in This State by Clarifying the Relationship of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies with Federal Immigration Authorities
Jan 11, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 517 · Without signature
Rep. Deqa Dhalac · Sponsored / Sen. Rachel Talbot Ross · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mana Abdi · Co-sponsored / Rep. Flavia DeBrito · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tavis Hasenfus · Co-sponsored / Rep. Adam Lee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Rafael Macias · Co-sponsored / Rep. Ambureen Rana · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eleanor Sato · Co-sponsored / Rep. Yusuf Yusuf · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 1971 limits state and local law enforcement use of money and personnel for federal civil immigration enforcement, detention based solely on hold requests and transfers without a court order or criminal warrant. It preserves specified information exchanges, criminal-law actions, qualifying joint task forces and other exceptions. Custodial consent, notice and recordkeeping rules also apply. It became law without the governor’s signature; enactment alone does not establish current enforceability or population effects.
Law chapter 517, became law without the governor’s signature 2026-01-11. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and noncitizens with many statuses. Limits on state and local involvement in federal immigration enforcement concern subsets of that population. Birthplace does not establish immigration status or criminal conduct. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
§4762. Activities unaffected This chapter may not be construed to prohibit: 1. Exchanging information consistent with federal law. A law enforcement agency from sending to or requesting or receiving from an immigration authority information regarding the immigration status of a person or maintaining or exchanging that information with any other federal, state or local governmental entity under 8 United States Code, Section 1373 or 1644; or 2. Actions against person pursuant to certain criminal laws. A law enforcement agency from investigating, lawfully detaining, executing a criminal warrant or taking other action against a person pursuant to state criminal law or federal law as provided in section 4763, subsection 2. §4763. Prohibited activities 1. Prohibited activities. A law enforcement agency may not: A. Except as provided in subsection 2, use agency or department money or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, stop, arrest or search a person for immigration enforcement purposes, including: (1) Inquiring into a person's immigration status; (2) Detaining a person solely on the basis of a hold request; (3) Providing to immigration authorities information regarding the person's release date unless that information is available to the public; (4) Providing to immigration authorities personal information about the person, including the person's home address or work address; (5) Making or intentionally participating in an arrest based upon a hold request; (6) Assisting immigration authorities in activities described in 8 United States Code, Section 1357(a)(3); or Page 3 - 132LR0978(03) (7) Performing the functions of an immigration authority; B. Place a law enforcement officer under the supervision of a federal agency or employ a law enforcement officer deputized as a special federal officer or special federal deputy for immigration enforcement; C. Use an agent or employee of an immigration authority as an interpreter for local law enforcement agency matters regarding a person in the law enforcement agency's custody; or D. Transfer a person to an immigration authority unless authorized by a court order or criminal warrant. With the exception of willful or wanton misconduct, a law enforcement agency that acts in good faith compliance with this section in releasing a person subject to a hold request is immune from civil or criminal liability as a result of making the release. 2. Permitted activities. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 1, if an activity does not violate a policy of the law enforcement agency or a state or local law or policy of the jurisdiction in which the agency is operating, a law enforcement agency may: A. Investigate, take enforcement action against or detain a person upon reasonable suspicion of or arrest a person for a violation of 8 United States Code, Section 1326 that may be subject to the enhancement specified under 8 United States Code, Section 1326(b)(2) and that is detected during an unrelated law enforcement activity. A transfer to an immigration authority under this paragraph is permitted only if authorized by a court order or criminal warrant; B. Respond to a request from an immigration authority for information about a specific person's criminal history, including a previous criminal arrest or conviction or similar public criminal history record information accessed under Title 16, chapter 7, when otherwise permitted by state law; C. Conduct enforcement or investigative duties associated with a joint law enforcement task force, including the execution of a warrant or sharing of confidential information with a federal law enforcement agency or another law enforcement agency, for the purpose of a task force investigation, if: (1) The primary purpose of the joint law enforcement task force is not immigration enforcement; (2) The enforcement or investigative duties are primarily related to a violation of state or federal law, including but not limited to terrorism, drug trafficking or human trafficking; and (3) Participation in the task force by the law enforcement agency does not violate any state or local law or policy to which the agency is subject; D. Make an inquiry into information necessary to certify an individual identified as a potential crime or trafficking victim for a visa pursuant to 8 United States Code, Section 1101(a)(15)(T) or 1101(a)(15)(U) or to comply with 18 United States Code, Section 922(d)(5); or Page 4 - 132LR0978(03) E. Give an immigration authority access to interview an individual in the custody of the agency, as long as the immigration authority's interview request is supported by a valid court order. §4764. Duties of custodial law enforcement agencies A law enforcement agency shall, for an inmate in the agency's custody: 1. Written consent for voluntary interview. In advance of an interview between the inmate and an immigration authority regarding a civil immigration violation, provide the inmate with a written consent form that explains the purpose of the interview, that the interview is voluntary and that the inmate may decline the interview or be interviewed only with the inmate's attorney present. The consent form must be written in the primary language of the inmate and read to the inmate by a person who is not an immigration authority. This paragraph does not establish a right of counsel that otherwise does not exist in law; and 2. Notice of hold request. Upon receiving a hold request, provide a copy of the request to the inmate and inform the inmate that the law enforcement agency is prohibited under section 4763 from detaining an inmate based solely on the hold request. §4765. Records A law enforcement agency shall make reasonable efforts to retain for a period of 4 years a copy of a hold request and any other request along with any accompanying information or documentation provided by an immigration authority and information on the inmate subject to the hold request.
An Act to Prevent Domestic Violence by Providing Adequate Funding Support for Court-ordered Certified Domestic Violence Intervention Programs
Apr 16, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 748
Rep. Drew Gattine · Sponsored / Sen. Pinny H. Beebe-Center · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tavis Hasenfus · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nina Milliken · Co-sponsored / Sen. Chip Curry · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 666 provides a one-time $500,000 appropriation in fiscal 2026–27 for certified domestic violence intervention programs. It directs a $500,000 settlement-fund transfer by June 30, 2027 and reallocates existing indigent-participant fee reimbursement funding toward ongoing program funding. The relationship concerns intervention in domestic violence, including potentially fatal and aggravated-assault cases; it does not demonstrate program effectiveness or fewer deaths or offenses.
Law chapter 748, approved 2026-04-16. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The CDC fact counts age-adjusted resident homicide deaths. Court-ordered intervention programs concern prevention of domestic violence, including potentially fatal violence, a subset of homicides. Program funding is not a homicide count or evidence that deaths fell. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. Transfer of settlement funds. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the State Controller shall transfer $500,000 from the Administration - Attorney General, Other Special Revenue Funds account within the Department of the Attorney General from funds received from settlement agreements to the unappropriated surplus of the General Fund no later than June 30, 2027. Sec. 2. Reallocation of existing funds. Any existing funds allocated to the Department of Corrections, Office of Victim Services for the purpose of funding partial reimbursement of certified domestic violence intervention program indigent participant fees must be reallocated to similarly provide ongoing funding for certified domestic violence intervention programs. Sec. 3. Appropriations and allocations. The following appropriations and allocations are made. CORRECTIONS, DEPARTMENT OF Office of Victim Services 0046 Initiative: Provides one-time funding for certified domestic violence intervention programs. GENERAL FUND 2025-26 2026-27 All Other $0 $500,000 __________ __________ GENERAL FUND TOTAL $0 $500,000
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Matt A. HarringtonMaine Legislature · LD 1773
An Act to Criminalize Certain Offenses Related to Gift Card Thefts
Apr 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 714
Sen. Matt A. Harrington · Sponsored / Rep. Chad Perkins · Co-sponsored / Sen. Scott Cyrway · Co-sponsored / Rep. W. Crockett · Co-sponsored / Rep. Robert Nutting · Co-sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LD 1773 adds a definition of retail merchandise to Maine’s retail-theft statute. It covers products, goods and items of value displayed, held, stored or offered for retail sale, expressly including tangible property, gift cards, electronics and commodities. The final provision clarifies the property covered by the existing theft statute; it does not enact every offense in the original proposal or establish fewer thefts.
Law chapter 714, approved 2026-04-15. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
FBI property crime includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. Defining retail merchandise, including gift cards, concerns a theft component rather than all property crimes or a demonstrated reduction in reported offenses. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maine evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 1. 17-A MRSA §363, sub-§2 is enacted to read: 2. As used in this section, "retail merchandise" means any product, good or other item of value that is displayed, held, stored or offered by a retailer for retail sale to consumers. "Retail merchandise" includes, but is not limited to, tangible personal property, gift cards, electronics and commodities.
Only current Maine officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Maine statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Maine snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Maine, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.