Iowa · individual fact

Iowa real gross domestic product

Iowa’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$204.86B2025 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth-0.4%2025 · #50 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$271.94B2025 · #32 of 50 · highest first

Iowa over time

Explore Iowa readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Iowa officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Iowa effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Iowa change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP Iowa · source units
IowaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $204.86B$0$13.4T$26.79TIowa, 2014: $180.31BIowa, 2015: $185.99BIowa, 2016: $186.73BIowa, 2017: $187.13BIowa, 2018: $189.14BIowa, 2019: $188.38BIowa, 2020: $185.12BIowa, 2021: $198.91BIowa, 2022: $202.3BIowa, 2023: $203.46BIowa, 2024: $205.74BIowa, 2025: $204.86B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 48National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsIowa · Iowa establishes its rural investment initiative · 2018-07-18Iowa rural investment initiativeNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownIowa · Iowa establishes a flood recovery advisory board · 2019-04-15Iowa flood recovery boardNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsIowa · Iowa requires B20-compatible diesel vehicle procurement · 2019-12-03Iowa biodiesel procurementNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefIowa · Iowa establishes a pandemic recovery advisory board · 2020-06-18Iowa pandemic recovery boardIowa · Derecho damages Iowa homes, crops and power infrastructure · 2020-08-10Iowa derechoIowa · Iowa establishes a child care and workforce task force · 2021-03-10Iowa child care task forceNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanIowa · Iowa establishes carbon sequestration review · 2021-06-22Iowa carbon sequestration reviewNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesIowa · Iowa orders review of its administrative rules · 2023-01-10Iowa administrative rule reviewIowa · Iowa’s conditional rulemaking moratorium begins · 2023-02-01Iowa conditional rulemaking moratoriumNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressIowa · Iowa approves income-tax and local-finance changes · 2024-05-01Iowa tax and finance lawIowa · Iowa amends work-based learning governance and rescinds older orders · 2024-06-06Iowa executive-order amendmentsIowa · Heavy rainfall begins Iowa flash and river flooding · 2024-06-20Northwest Iowa floodsNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownIowa · Iowa establishes a nuclear energy advisory task force · 2026-01-05Iowa nuclear energy task forceNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruptionIowa · Iowa approves nuclear incentives and a university workforce fund · 2026-06-01Iowa nuclear lawIowa · Iowa approves an omnibus law with six item vetoes · 2026-06-02Iowa omnibus approvalIowa · Iowa establishes an Office of Outdoor Recreation · 2026-06-08Iowa outdoor recreation officeIowa · Iowa omnibus school, sanitation and workforce provisions take effect · 2026-07-01Iowa July provisionsIowa · Iowa’s nuclear tax incentive and workforce-fund law takes effect · 2026-07-01Iowa nuclear incentive startsIowa · Iowa publishes its nuclear energy task force report · 2026-09-03Iowa nuclear report released● Iowa Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · Iowa delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 13■ Iowa agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-09-30

16 of 16 reviewed Iowa actions match · 16 date markers shown. 48 major events shown separately.

Iowa · 2025: $204.86B · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Iowa Real GDP · source units
PeriodIowaRankU.S. benchmark
2025$204.86B#32 of 50$23.94T
2024$205.74B#32 of 50$23.39T
2023$203.46B#31 of 50$22.72T
2022$202.3B#30 of 50$22.08T
2021$198.91B#30 of 50$21.56T
2020$185.12B#31 of 50$20.28T
2019$188.38B#31 of 50$20.72T
2018$189.14B#30 of 50$20.19T
2017$187.13B#30 of 50$19.61T
2016$186.73B#30 of 50$19.14T
2015$185.99B#30 of 50$18.8T
2014$180.31B#30 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Iowa · state comparison

Iowa output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

Iowa · 2025$204.86B
Iowa rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Real GDP history in Iowa$-3.38T$12.06T$27.51T20142025
2025 · Iowa: $204.86B · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Real GDP history
PeriodIowaCompare
2014$180.31B
2015$185.99B
2016$186.73B
2017$187.13B
2018$189.14B
2019$188.38B
2020$185.12B
2021$198.91B
2022$202.3B
2023$203.46B
2024$205.74B
2025$204.86B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · $204.86B2025 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa · your comparison$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

What makes up Iowa GDP?

Choose an industry to compare Iowa’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

Iowa · 2025$14.1B
Iowa rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in Iowa$-37.73B$149.47B$336.67B20142025
2025 · Iowa: $14.1B · Rank #3 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodIowaCompare
2014$11.13B
2015$9.19B
2016$7.67B
2017$8.51B
2018$8.99B
2019$6.72B
2020$5.47B
2021$13.58B
2022$19.54B
2023$14.66B
2024$13.49B
2025$14.1B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · $14.1B2025 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa · your comparison$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Iowa · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

Iowa · 20252,122,389
Iowa rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Iowa
Total employment · jobs history in Iowa-30,426,542110,171,986250,770,51420142025
2025 · Iowa: 2,122,389 · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Iowa Total employment · jobs history
PeriodIowaCompare
20142,039,785
20152,061,324
20162,068,780
20172,064,579
20182,081,080
20192,077,256
20202,019,272
20212,066,254
20222,105,360
20232,117,924
20242,120,072
20252,122,389

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Iowa stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Iowa has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Iowa · 2,122,3892025 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Iowa with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa · your comparison2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Iowa candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

9 statements from 3 candidates

2026 Iowa Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Dave Muhlbauer

4 statements

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · IA

Economic growth & production context

Invest in sustainable commodities: We need to identify more enterprises that can allow farmers to turn manure into a commodity they can use and sell. That means investing state economic development funds and incentives in plants and facilities that can convert agricultural waste into valuable bio-ba…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Invest in sustainable commodities: We need to identify more enterprises that can allow farmers to turn manure into a commodity they can use and sell. That means investing state economic development funds and incentives in plants and facilities that can convert agricultural waste into valuable bio-based products, creating more income for farmers and good-paying rural manufacturing jobs. That includes things like biomass conversion programs, selling renewable natural gas generated by methane digesters, organic fertilizer, and more. For example, manure can be converted into renewable natural gas, a key ingredient in sustainable aviation fuel. This supports farmers’ bottom lines while also helping to improve water quality.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
View 3 more statements from Dave Muhlbauer
Economic growth & production context

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (C…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (Choose Iowa, Farm to School, USDA’s LAMP programs, Resilient Food System Infrastructure Fund, Iowa Economic Development Programs) to maximize efforts to grow food that can be consumed locally. Think farm to school, farm to hospital, farm to prison, farm to food bank. The federal government had a local food purchasing agreement program, but the program was cut. As governor, I’d model the former federal policy to the state level, and establish regional food business centers, a division tasked with advocating and assisting farmers with things like technical assistance and market development to boost the supply chain and support local job growth. Tax dollars from schools, hospitals, and jails go to feed people every day; the more that can get spent locally, the longer that money circulates in our local economies, and the more vitality we have outside of our towns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 10 ↗
Economic growth & production context

As Governor, Rob will get Iowa back on track – he’ll build consensus to get the state government out of the culture wars and focused on lowering costs, growing the economy, improving our education system, and helping Iowans live better, healthier lives.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Rob Sand knows we need to move Iowa in a new direction

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, Rob will get Iowa back on track – he’ll build consensus to get the state government out of the culture wars and focused on lowering costs, growing the economy, improving our education system, and helping Iowans live better, healthier lives.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 2 ↗
Economic growth & production context

Iowa is consistently ranked at the bottom in the country for economic growth, and has averaged 48th for personal income growth over the last three years. Iowa’s hourly wage is the worst and least competitive in the region – the average Nebraskan earns nearly $2,000 more per year than the average Iow…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Sand–Muhlbauer Shared Ticket Platform

Candidate campaign source

Iowa is consistently ranked at the bottom in the country for economic growth, and has averaged 48th for personal income growth over the last three years. Iowa’s hourly wage is the worst and least competitive in the region – the average Nebraskan earns nearly $2,000 more per year than the average Iowan, and the average Wisconsinite more than $3,000.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Dave Muhlbauer campaign source 11 ↗

Rob Sand

3 statements

Democratic · Governor · IA

Economic growth & production context

As Governor, Rob will get Iowa back on track – he’ll build consensus to get the state government out of the culture wars and focused on lowering costs, growing the economy, improving our education system, and helping Iowans live better, healthier lives.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: State government priorities

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, Rob will get Iowa back on track – he’ll build consensus to get the state government out of the culture wars and focused on lowering costs, growing the economy, improving our education system, and helping Iowans live better, healthier lives.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Rob Sand
Economic growth & production context

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (C…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy

Candidate campaign source

Increase Investment in Local/Regional Food Programs: Iowa grows and produces food that feeds the world. We should also grow more food to feed ourselves. We need to invest in and create more locally owned processing capacity through a coordinated use of existing federal programs and state programs (Choose Iowa, Farm to School, USDA’s LAMP programs, Resilient Food System Infrastructure Fund, Iowa Economic Development Programs) to maximize efforts to grow food that can be consumed locally. Think farm to school, farm to hospital, farm to prison, farm to food bank. The federal government had a local food purchasing agreement program, but the program was cut. As governor, I’d model the former federal policy to the state level, and establish regional food business centers, a division tasked with advocating and assisting farmers with things like technical assistance and market development to boost the supply chain and support local job growth. Tax dollars from schools, hospitals, and jails go to feed people every day; the more that can get spent locally, the longer that money circulates in our local economies, and the more vitality we have outside of our towns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗
Economic growth & production context

Invest in sustainable commodities: We need to identify more enterprises that can allow farmers to turn manure into a commodity they can use and sell. That means investing state economic development funds and incentives in plants and facilities that can convert agricultural waste into valuable bio-ba…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy

Candidate campaign source

Invest in sustainable commodities: We need to identify more enterprises that can allow farmers to turn manure into a commodity they can use and sell. That means investing state economic development funds and incentives in plants and facilities that can convert agricultural waste into valuable bio-based products, creating more income for farmers and good-paying rural manufacturing jobs. That includes things like biomass conversion programs, selling renewable natural gas generated by methane digesters, organic fertilizer, and more. For example, manure can be converted into renewable natural gas, a key ingredient in sustainable aviation fuel. This supports farmers’ bottom lines while also helping to improve water quality.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rob Sand — candidate-owned primary source 9 ↗

2026 Iowa U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Joe Mitchell

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · IA

Economic growth & production context

Hardworking Americans and small businesses deserve a tax system that rewards work, not punishes it. I will cut taxes for middle-class families and job creators, simplify the tax code, and help people keep more of what they earn to grow the economy and create good-paying jobs. We must end years of wa…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Hardworking Americans and small businesses deserve a tax system that rewards work, not punishes it. I will cut taxes for middle-class families and job creators, simplify the tax code, and help people keep more of what they earn to grow the economy and create good-paying jobs. We must end years of wage stagnation that have hurt working families despite rising productivity and profits. I will prioritize American workers by keeping jobs in America, strengthening antitrust enforcement, and keeping prices low.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joe Mitchell — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Joe Mitchell
Economic growth & production context

Years of wage stagnation have weakened working-class financial security even as productivity and corporate profits have risen. I will fight to prioritize American workers and keep prices low by keeping jobs in America and strengthening antitrust enforcement.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Years of wage stagnation have weakened working-class financial security even as productivity and corporate profits have risen. I will fight to prioritize American workers and keep prices low by keeping jobs in America and strengthening antitrust enforcement.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joe Mitchell — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Iowa candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Iowa incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Iowa legislators and Iowa’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Iowa’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

0 matching sponsorships or proposals · 0 Iowa incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

No retained proposals match these filters. A missing record does not mean an incumbent has taken no action.

What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Iowa officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Iowa statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.