Enacted appropriations
$54.7BThe FY2027 annual total in Indiana's official 2025–2027 Whole Budget Report. It includes General Fund, dedicated, federal, and local-fund appropriations and is the second year of the enacted biennial budget.
Indiana state-government finances, comparable debt and interest figures, and the enacted budget.
The national companion measures federal finances. Here the unit is Indiana state government. Federal debt is not allocated to Indiana; a state budget is not the federal budget.
Explore Indiana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Indiana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Indiana effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Indiana change.
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
No comparable time series is retained for this topic. The chart shows events and reviewed actions; current state comparisons appear below.
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
3 of 3 reviewed Indiana actions match · 3 date markers shown. 51 major events shown separately.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Compare state-government balances and interest expenditure from the same Census fiscal-year survey.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Long-term debt outstanding plus short-term debt outstanding at fiscal year end.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Excludes local-government debt. Dollar ranks describe scale, not credit quality.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Indiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Indiana has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $166.39B | — |
| #2 | New York | $120.59B | — |
| #3 | Texas | $70.05B | — |
| #4 | Massachusetts | $65.87B | — |
| #5 | New Jersey | $57.23B | — |
| #6 | Pennsylvania | $48.67B | — |
| #7 | Illinois | $43.38B | — |
| #8 | Virginia | $33.73B | — |
| #9 | Connecticut | $33.27B | — |
| #10 | Ohio | $32.29B | — |
| #11 | Washington | $30.62B | — |
| #12 | Maryland | $25.9B | — |
| #13 | Michigan | $25.02B | — |
| #14 | Colorado | $23.57B | — |
| #15 | Wisconsin | $22.79B | — |
| #16 | Florida | $20.14B | — |
| #17 | Minnesota | $17.03B | — |
| #18 | Oregon | $16.91B | — |
| #19 | Louisiana | $16.09B | — |
| #20 | South Carolina | $15.36B | — |
| #21 | West Virginia | $15.08B | — |
| #22 | Georgia | $14.05B | — |
| #23 | North Carolina | $13.13B | — |
| #24 | Hawaii | $11.72B | — |
| #25 | Rhode Island | $11.41B | — |
| #26 | Alabama | $10.99B | — |
| #27 | Oklahoma | $10.15B | — |
| #28 | Kentucky | $10.08B | — |
| #29 | Tennessee | $9.03B | — |
| #30 | Indiana · your comparison | $8.52B | — |
| #31 | Iowa | $8.06B | — |
| #32 | Arkansas | $8.05B | — |
| #33 | Mississippi | $7.72B | — |
| #34 | New Hampshire | $7.58B | — |
| #35 | Kansas | $7.16B | — |
| #36 | New Mexico | $7.12B | — |
| #37 | Missouri | $6.99B | — |
| #38 | Arizona | $6.88B | — |
| #39 | Alaska | $5.72B | — |
| #40 | Utah | $5.55B | — |
| #41 | Maine | $5.3B | — |
| #42 | North Dakota | $4.89B | — |
| #43 | South Dakota | $4.67B | — |
| #44 | Delaware | $3.69B | — |
| #45 | Nebraska | $3.39B | — |
| #46 | Nevada | $2.89B | — |
| #47 | Montana | $2.76B | — |
| #48 | Vermont | $2.67B | — |
| #49 | Wyoming | $1.26B | — |
| #50 | Idaho | $728.59M | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
All measures use Census state-government records for FY2024. Categories describe collections; they do not rank statutory tax rates.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Census category T09.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Indiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Indiana has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Texas | $54.35B | — |
| #2 | California | $53.33B | — |
| #3 | Florida | $40.09B | — |
| #4 | Washington | $22.81B | — |
| #5 | New York | $19.99B | — |
| #6 | Ohio | $16.33B | — |
| #7 | Illinois | $16.05B | — |
| #8 | Pennsylvania | $15.6B | — |
| #9 | New Jersey | $14.31B | — |
| #10 | Tennessee | $14.08B | — |
| #11 | Arizona | $13.16B | — |
| #12 | Michigan | $12.7B | — |
| #13 | North Carolina | $12.16B | — |
| #14 | Indiana · your comparison | $10.96B | — |
| #15 | Massachusetts | $9.4B | — |
| #16 | Georgia | $9.01B | — |
| #17 | Minnesota | $8.49B | — |
| #18 | Nevada | $8.4B | — |
| #19 | Wisconsin | $7.59B | — |
| #20 | Virginia | $7.4B | — |
| #21 | Maryland | $6.85B | — |
| #22 | South Carolina | $6.44B | — |
| #23 | Connecticut | $6.23B | — |
| #24 | Kentucky | $5.8B | — |
| #25 | Missouri | $5.26B | — |
| #26 | Mississippi | $5.07B | — |
| #27 | Arkansas | $5.07B | — |
| #28 | Louisiana | $4.87B | — |
| #29 | Hawaii | $4.79B | — |
| #30 | Colorado | $4.67B | — |
| #31 | Iowa | $4.64B | — |
| #32 | Utah | $4.63B | — |
| #33 | Alabama | $4.59B | — |
| #34 | Kansas | $4.33B | — |
| #35 | New Mexico | $4.33B | — |
| #36 | Oklahoma | $3.81B | — |
| #37 | Idaho | $3.09B | — |
| #38 | Nebraska | $2.97B | — |
| #39 | Maine | $2.35B | — |
| #40 | West Virginia | $1.82B | — |
| #41 | South Dakota | $1.68B | — |
| #42 | Rhode Island | $1.63B | — |
| #43 | Oregon | $1.34B | — |
| #44 | North Dakota | $1.32B | — |
| #45 | Wyoming | $1.01B | — |
| #46 | Vermont | $597.33M | — |
| #47 | Alaska | $0 | — |
| #47 | Delaware | $0 | — |
| #47 | Montana | $0 | — |
| #47 | New Hampshire | $0 | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Census categories allow consistent comparisons. These selected categories are not a breakdown of the current Indiana appropriations act.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current operations for public welfare institutions and other public welfare, excluding capital and transfers.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Indiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Indiana has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $156.71B | — |
| #2 | New York | $97.35B | — |
| #3 | Texas | $57.32B | — |
| #4 | Illinois | $41.13B | — |
| #5 | Florida | $40.11B | — |
| #6 | Ohio | $39.77B | — |
| #7 | Pennsylvania | $39.34B | — |
| #8 | Massachusetts | $34.12B | — |
| #9 | North Carolina | $30.64B | — |
| #10 | New Jersey | $28.06B | — |
| #11 | Arizona | $26.02B | — |
| #12 | Michigan | $24.37B | — |
| #13 | Virginia | $23.68B | — |
| #14 | Minnesota | $23.37B | — |
| #15 | Indiana · your comparison | $22.93B | — |
| #16 | Maryland | $21.61B | — |
| #17 | Kentucky | $20.54B | — |
| #18 | Oregon | $20.47B | — |
| #19 | Washington | $19.6B | — |
| #20 | Georgia | $18.99B | — |
| #21 | Louisiana | $18.69B | — |
| #22 | Tennessee | $16.42B | — |
| #23 | Wisconsin | $16.26B | — |
| #24 | Missouri | $15.65B | — |
| #25 | Oklahoma | $14.57B | — |
| #26 | Colorado | $13.6B | — |
| #27 | South Carolina | $12.84B | — |
| #28 | New Mexico | $10.72B | — |
| #29 | Iowa | $10.26B | — |
| #30 | Alabama | $9.73B | — |
| #31 | Arkansas | $8.67B | — |
| #32 | Mississippi | $8.08B | — |
| #33 | Utah | $6.91B | — |
| #34 | Kansas | $6.84B | — |
| #35 | Nevada | $6.62B | — |
| #36 | West Virginia | $6.24B | — |
| #37 | Maine | $5.7B | — |
| #38 | Nebraska | $4.97B | — |
| #39 | Connecticut | $4.88B | — |
| #40 | Rhode Island | $4.54B | — |
| #41 | Hawaii | $4.14B | — |
| #42 | Delaware | $3.97B | — |
| #43 | Idaho | $3.73B | — |
| #44 | Alaska | $3.27B | — |
| #45 | Montana | $2.89B | — |
| #46 | New Hampshire | $2.72B | — |
| #47 | Vermont | $2.69B | — |
| #48 | North Dakota | $2.09B | — |
| #49 | South Dakota | $1.95B | — |
| #50 | Wyoming | $1.09B | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The enacted plan, spending categories and audited activity use different periods and accounting scopes; they are kept separate.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Sum of Census current-operation expenditure categories, excluding capital outlay, interest, and assistance/subsidy expenditure.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. This FY2024 comparison differs in scope and period from Indiana’s FY2027 appropriations and Fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 audit shown below.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Indiana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Indiana has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $287.03B | — |
| #2 | New York | $161.37B | — |
| #3 | Texas | $136.18B | — |
| #4 | Florida | $86.61B | — |
| #5 | Pennsylvania | $77.15B | — |
| #6 | Illinois | $75.67B | — |
| #7 | Ohio | $66.77B | — |
| #8 | New Jersey | $64.53B | — |
| #9 | Massachusetts | $61.38B | — |
| #10 | North Carolina | $59.01B | — |
| #11 | Michigan | $57.27B | — |
| #12 | Virginia | $53.45B | — |
| #13 | Washington | $49.82B | — |
| #14 | Georgia | $45.19B | — |
| #15 | Maryland | $45.06B | — |
| #16 | Oregon | $41.41B | — |
| #17 | Arizona | $38.71B | — |
| #18 | Minnesota | $38.1B | — |
| #19 | Indiana · your comparison | $37.4B | — |
| #20 | Kentucky | $36.94B | — |
| #21 | Wisconsin | $34.5B | — |
| #22 | Missouri | $34.43B | — |
| #23 | South Carolina | $32.85B | — |
| #24 | Colorado | $32.73B | — |
| #25 | Louisiana | $31.67B | — |
| #26 | Tennessee | $31.12B | — |
| #27 | Alabama | $26.99B | — |
| #28 | Oklahoma | $24.28B | — |
| #29 | Utah | $22.7B | — |
| #30 | New Mexico | $21.94B | — |
| #31 | Connecticut | $21.22B | — |
| #32 | Iowa | $19.89B | — |
| #33 | Kansas | $18.39B | — |
| #34 | Hawaii | $16.62B | — |
| #35 | Mississippi | $16.46B | — |
| #36 | Arkansas | $16.28B | — |
| #37 | West Virginia | $13.19B | — |
| #38 | Nevada | $12.43B | — |
| #39 | Nebraska | $10.41B | — |
| #40 | Maine | $10.12B | — |
| #41 | Delaware | $9.24B | — |
| #42 | Rhode Island | $8.93B | — |
| #43 | Alaska | $8.4B | — |
| #44 | Idaho | $8.21B | — |
| #45 | New Hampshire | $7.12B | — |
| #46 | Montana | $6.44B | — |
| #47 | Vermont | $6.28B | — |
| #48 | North Dakota | $5.63B | — |
| #49 | South Dakota | $4.55B | — |
| #50 | Wyoming | $4.01B | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The FY2027 annual total in Indiana's official 2025–2027 Whole Budget Report. It includes General Fund, dedicated, federal, and local-fund appropriations and is the second year of the enacted biennial budget.
Shares of the $24.564 billion in taxes reported as general revenue for Indiana's primary government. The denominator excludes grants, charges for services, investment earnings, miscellaneous revenue, county income taxes, and local property taxes.
Every functional category in the official FY2027 all-sources appropriation summary is assigned exactly once to one of these service groups. The groups reconcile to the exact $54.706 billion annual total.
Audited government-wide activity for Indiana's primary government. Revenue combines program revenue and general revenue before internal transfers; these accrual-accounting results are not FY2027 appropriation authority.
Explore statements about budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt from FactVote’s Indiana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
Elise Nieshalla’s leadership is rooted in faith, family, fiscal responsibility, and freedom. She supports President Trump’s America First agenda and will always fight for free enterprise and the rights to life, self-defense, and religious liberty.
Elise Nieshalla’s leadership is rooted in faith, family, fiscal responsibility, and freedom. She supports President Trump’s America First agenda and will always fight for free enterprise and the rights to life, self-defense, and religious liberty.Elise Nieshalla campaign source 4 ↗
Address the National Debt
Create a path to a balanced budget as soon as possible
Create a path to a balanced budget as soon as possibleElise Nieshalla campaign source 6 ↗
Frank is honored to serve on the House Appropriations Committee, which is responsible for allocating funding for the federal government. In his role, Frank fights for our region’s values to ensure our federal budget is aligned with our priorities.
Frank is honored to serve on the House Appropriations Committee, which is responsible for allocating funding for the federal government. In his role, Frank fights for our region’s values to ensure our federal budget is aligned with our priorities.Frank J. Mrvan — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Restore fiscal responsibility in the federal government.
Restore fiscal responsibility in the federal government.Rudy Yakym — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Federal Financial Stability – • Reduce taxes and reform tax law• Eliminate wasteful foreign conflict budget spending• Reduce federal agency budgets and personnel• Eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse• Grow and promote U.S. businesses• Reduce suppressive regulatory hurdles for businesses
Federal Financial Stability – • Reduce taxes and reform tax law• Eliminate wasteful foreign conflict budget spending• Reduce federal agency budgets and personnel• Eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse• Grow and promote U.S. businesses• Reduce suppressive regulatory hurdles for businessesWilliam Eric Henry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
• Eliminate wasteful foreign conflict budget spending
• Eliminate wasteful foreign conflict budget spendingWilliam Eric Henry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
This section matches specific budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt terms in retained, attributed source text from published Indiana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Indiana legislators and Indiana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Indiana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
8 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Indiana incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Indiana House · District 28 · R–IN
2 proposalsMay 6, 2025 · Enacted · Public Law 213
Rep. Jeffrey Thompson · Sponsored / Rep. Gregory Porter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Craig Snow · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jack Jordan · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Chris Garten · Sponsored / Sen. David Niezgodski · Sponsored
The 2025 budget law appropriated funds for the fiscal 2026–27 biennium and removed the annual income maximum for Choice Scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026. Student, school and application requirements remain. The governor signed it May 6, 2025. Appropriations, expected fiscal balances and eligibility rules do not establish actual spending or educational outcomes.
Signed May 6, 2025. The enrolled official digest identifies June 29, 2026 for the scholarship income-limit change; other provisions have separate schedules.
The 2025 budget law appropriated funds for the fiscal 2026–27 biennium and removed the annual income maximum for Choice Scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026. Student, school and application requirements remain. The governor signed it May 6, 2025. Appropriations, expected fiscal balances and eligibility rules do not establish actual spending or educational outcomes.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Budget and education · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Removes the annual income maximum for choice scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026.Review official supporting evidence ↗
May 4, 2023 · Enacted · Public Law 201
Rep. Jeffrey Thompson · Sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Travis Holdman · Sponsored / Sen. Chris Garten · Sponsored
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on May 4, 2023 as Public Law 201.
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Indiana Senate · District 45 · R–IN
2 proposalsMay 6, 2025 · Enacted · Public Law 213
Rep. Jeffrey Thompson · Sponsored / Rep. Gregory Porter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Craig Snow · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jack Jordan · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Chris Garten · Sponsored / Sen. David Niezgodski · Sponsored
The 2025 budget law appropriated funds for the fiscal 2026–27 biennium and removed the annual income maximum for Choice Scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026. Student, school and application requirements remain. The governor signed it May 6, 2025. Appropriations, expected fiscal balances and eligibility rules do not establish actual spending or educational outcomes.
Signed May 6, 2025. The enrolled official digest identifies June 29, 2026 for the scholarship income-limit change; other provisions have separate schedules.
The 2025 budget law appropriated funds for the fiscal 2026–27 biennium and removed the annual income maximum for Choice Scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026. Student, school and application requirements remain. The governor signed it May 6, 2025. Appropriations, expected fiscal balances and eligibility rules do not establish actual spending or educational outcomes.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Budget and education · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Removes the annual income maximum for choice scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026.Review official supporting evidence ↗
May 4, 2023 · Enacted · Public Law 201
Rep. Jeffrey Thompson · Sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Travis Holdman · Sponsored / Sen. Chris Garten · Sponsored
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on May 4, 2023 as Public Law 201.
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Indiana Senate · District 10 · D–IN
1 proposalMay 6, 2025 · Enacted · Public Law 213
Rep. Jeffrey Thompson · Sponsored / Rep. Gregory Porter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Craig Snow · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jack Jordan · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Chris Garten · Sponsored / Sen. David Niezgodski · Sponsored
The 2025 budget law appropriated funds for the fiscal 2026–27 biennium and removed the annual income maximum for Choice Scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026. Student, school and application requirements remain. The governor signed it May 6, 2025. Appropriations, expected fiscal balances and eligibility rules do not establish actual spending or educational outcomes.
Signed May 6, 2025. The enrolled official digest identifies June 29, 2026 for the scholarship income-limit change; other provisions have separate schedules.
The 2025 budget law appropriated funds for the fiscal 2026–27 biennium and removed the annual income maximum for Choice Scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026. Student, school and application requirements remain. The governor signed it May 6, 2025. Appropriations, expected fiscal balances and eligibility rules do not establish actual spending or educational outcomes.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Budget and education · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Removes the annual income maximum for choice scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Indiana Senate · District 9 · R–IN
2 proposalsMay 6, 2025 · Enacted · Public Law 213
Rep. Jeffrey Thompson · Sponsored / Rep. Gregory Porter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Craig Snow · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jack Jordan · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Chris Garten · Sponsored / Sen. David Niezgodski · Sponsored
The 2025 budget law appropriated funds for the fiscal 2026–27 biennium and removed the annual income maximum for Choice Scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026. Student, school and application requirements remain. The governor signed it May 6, 2025. Appropriations, expected fiscal balances and eligibility rules do not establish actual spending or educational outcomes.
Signed May 6, 2025. The enrolled official digest identifies June 29, 2026 for the scholarship income-limit change; other provisions have separate schedules.
The 2025 budget law appropriated funds for the fiscal 2026–27 biennium and removed the annual income maximum for Choice Scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026. Student, school and application requirements remain. The governor signed it May 6, 2025. Appropriations, expected fiscal balances and eligibility rules do not establish actual spending or educational outcomes.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Budget and education · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Removes the annual income maximum for choice scholarship eligibility beginning June 29, 2026.Review official supporting evidence ↗
May 4, 2023 · Enacted · Public Law 201
Rep. Jeffrey Thompson · Sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Travis Holdman · Sponsored / Sen. Chris Garten · Sponsored
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on May 4, 2023 as Public Law 201.
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Indiana Senate, District 19 · R–IN
1 proposalMay 4, 2023 · Enacted · Public Law 201
Rep. Jeffrey Thompson · Sponsored / Sen. Ryan Mishler · Sponsored / Sen. Travis Holdman · Sponsored / Sen. Chris Garten · Sponsored
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.
The Indiana legislative record shows the measure was enacted on May 4, 2023 as Public Law 201.
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not. The fact measures cash rent plus tenant-paid utilities in occupied rental housing. No effect on the statewide median is established.
Retained Indiana evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The enrolled budget appropriates $1 million in each of fiscal years 2024 and 2025 for Indiana’s Housing First Program, which provides rental assistance and supportive services. This rental-assistance appropriation supports the link; the separate homeownership tax credit does not.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Only current Indiana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Indiana statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.