Illinois · individual fact

Illinois real gross domestic product

Illinois’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$948.03B2025 · #5 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth2.6%2025 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$1.24T2025 · #5 of 50 · highest first

Illinois over time

Explore Illinois readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Illinois officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Illinois effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Illinois change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP Illinois · source units
IllinoisPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $948.03B$0$13.36T$26.72TIllinois, 2014: $811.49BIllinois, 2015: $825.42BIllinois, 2016: $826.4BIllinois, 2017: $832.83BIllinois, 2018: $851.44BIllinois, 2019: $858.45BIllinois, 2020: $815.84BIllinois, 2021: $869.75BIllinois, 2022: $886.13BIllinois, 2023: $902.64BIllinois, 2024: $924.31BIllinois, 2025: $948.03B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 29National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● Illinois Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · Illinois delegation · 1◆ Governor · 4■ Illinois agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

8 of 8 reviewed Illinois actions match · 8 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.

Illinois · 2025: $948.03B · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Illinois Real GDP · source units
PeriodIllinoisRankU.S. benchmark
2025$948.03B#5 of 50$23.94T
2024$924.31B#5 of 50$23.39T
2023$902.64B#5 of 50$22.72T
2022$886.13B#5 of 50$22.08T
2021$869.75B#5 of 50$21.56T
2020$815.84B#5 of 50$20.28T
2019$858.45B#5 of 50$20.72T
2018$851.44B#5 of 50$20.19T
2017$832.83B#5 of 50$19.61T
2016$826.4B#5 of 50$19.14T
2015$825.42B#5 of 50$18.8T
2014$811.49B#5 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Illinois · state comparison

Illinois output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

Illinois · 2025$948.03B
Illinois rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Illinois
Real GDP history in Illinois$-2.66T$12.38T$27.41T20142025
2025 · Illinois: $948.03B · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Illinois Real GDP history
PeriodIllinoisCompare
2014$811.49B
2015$825.42B
2016$826.4B
2017$832.83B
2018$851.44B
2019$858.45B
2020$815.84B
2021$869.75B
2022$886.13B
2023$902.64B
2024$924.31B
2025$948.03B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Illinois stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Illinois has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Illinois · $948.03B2025 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Illinois with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois · your comparison$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Illinois · state comparison

What makes up Illinois GDP?

Choose an industry to compare Illinois’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

Illinois · 2025$9.52B
Illinois rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Illinois
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in Illinois$-38.95B$148.94B$336.83B20142025
2025 · Illinois: $9.52B · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Illinois Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodIllinoisCompare
2014$7.63B
2015$4.41B
2016$5.84B
2017$5.87B
2018$6.46B
2019$4.85B
2020$6.02B
2021$11.44B
2022$14.29B
2023$11.92B
2024$10.19B
2025$9.52B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Illinois stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Illinois has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Illinois · $9.52B2025 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Illinois with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois · your comparison$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Illinois · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

Illinois · 20258,197,037
Illinois rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Illinois
Total employment · jobs history in Illinois-24,092,862112,925,760249,944,38220142025
2025 · Illinois: 8,197,037 · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Illinois Total employment · jobs history
PeriodIllinoisCompare
20147,614,470
20157,750,223
20167,806,578
20177,825,564
20187,884,619
20197,864,228
20207,526,820
20217,758,348
20228,002,288
20238,102,678
20248,148,381
20258,197,037

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Illinois stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Illinois has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Illinois · 8,197,0372025 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Illinois with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois · your comparison8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Illinois candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

24 statements from 17 candidates

2026 Illinois Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Collin Corbett

1 statement

Independent · Governor · IL

Economic growth & production context

We’ll increase economic development by supporting our current businesses and bringing in new ones. This includes lowering the cost of doing business, cutting unnecessary regulations, strengthening key Illinois industries, leveling the playing field, and growing our skilled workforce. This will creat…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Hope for Illinois

Candidate campaign source

We’ll increase economic development by supporting our current businesses and bringing in new ones. This includes lowering the cost of doing business, cutting unnecessary regulations, strengthening key Illinois industries, leveling the playing field, and growing our skilled workforce. This will create more and better paying jobs for Illinoisans—raising everyone’s wages.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Collin Corbett — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗

2026 Illinois Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Independent · Lieutenant Governor · IL

Economic growth & production context

We’ll increase economic development by supporting our current businesses and bringing in new ones. This includes lowering the cost of doing business, cutting unnecessary regulations, strengthening key Illinois industries, leveling the playing field, and growing our skilled workforce. This will creat…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Hope for Illinois

Candidate campaign source

We’ll increase economic development by supporting our current businesses and bringing in new ones. This includes lowering the cost of doing business, cutting unnecessary regulations, strengthening key Illinois industries, leveling the playing field, and growing our skilled workforce. This will create more and better paying jobs for Illinoisans—raising everyone’s wages.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Carolyn Schofield — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗

2026 Illinois U.S. House District 11 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Jeff Walter

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 11 · IL

Economic growth & production context

Jeff believes that education is the foundation of opportunity and economic growth and that we need to get back to basics while preparing students for the real world. That includes expanding school choice so families have access to the best educational setting for their children, whether that’s publi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Jeff believes that education is the foundation of opportunity and economic growth and that we need to get back to basics while preparing students for the real world. That includes expanding school choice so families have access to the best educational setting for their children, whether that’s public, private, charter, or vocational pathways. Our focus should be on core skills like reading, math, and critical thinking, while also expanding career and technical education, apprenticeships, and pathways that don’t require a four-year degree.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jeff Walter — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 5
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Illinois candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Illinois incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Illinois legislators and Illinois’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Illinois’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

4 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Illinois incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Daniel Didech

Illinois House · District 59 · D–IL

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Daniel Didech
Illinois Legislature · HB 371

DEED RESTRICTIONS-SOLAR PANELS

Jan 10, 2023 · House: Session Sine Die

Rep. Daniel Didech · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Amends the Homeowners' Energy Policy Statement Act. Provides that the entity granted such power in a deed restriction may determine the specific location where a solar energy system may be installed on the roof if the determination does not reduce the production or productivity of the solar energy system by more than 5% (rather than within an orientation to the south or with 45 degrees east or west of due south provided that the determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar energy system). Defines "production" and "productivity". Provides that the application for approval to install or use a solar energy system shall be processed within 60 days of (rather than 90 days…

The latest official Illinois General Assembly record shows this action on January 10, 2023: House: Session Sine Die.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Illinois's displayed renewable-generation share.

Retained Illinois evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Provides that the entity granted such power in a deed restriction may determine the specific location where a solar energy system may be installed on the roof if the determination does not reduce the production or productivity of the solar energy system by more than 5% (rather than within an orientation to the south or with 45 degrees east or west of due south provided that the determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar energy system).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Illinois Legislature · HB 4068

DEED RESTRICTIONS-SOLAR PANELS

Jan 13, 2021 · House: Session Sine Die

Rep. Daniel Didech · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Amends the Homeowners' Energy Policy Statement Act. Provides that the entity granted such power in a deed restriction may determine the specific location where a solar energy system may be installed on the roof if the determination does not reduce the production or productivity of the solar energy system by more than 5% (rather than within an orientation to the south or with 45 degrees east or west of due south provided that the determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar energy system). Defines "production" and "productivity". Provides that the application for approval to install or use a solar energy system shall be processed within 60 days of (rather than 90 days…

The latest official Illinois General Assembly record shows this action on January 13, 2021: House: Session Sine Die.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Illinois's displayed renewable-generation share.

Retained Illinois evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Provides that the entity granted such power in a deed restriction may determine the specific location where a solar energy system may be installed on the roof if the determination does not reduce the production or productivity of the solar energy system by more than 5% (rather than within an orientation to the south or with 45 degrees east or west of due south provided that the determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar energy system).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Sean Casten

U.S. representative for Illinois, District 6 · D–IL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Sean Casten
U.S. Congress · Illinois delegation · H.R.5424

Energizing Our Communities Act

Sep 17, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Sean Casten · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Community Economic Development Transmission Fund (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered loan The term covered loan means any of the following issued after the date of enactment of this Act: (A) A loan issued under section 40106(e)(1)(B) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (42 U.S.C. 18713(e)(1)(B)). (B) A loan made for an eligible project described in paragraph (2)(B) under the Transmission Infrastructure Program of the Western Area Power Administration. (C) Any other loan made under a Department…

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Illinois's displayed renewable-generation share.

Retained Illinois evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Community Economic Development Transmission Fund (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Covered loan The term covered loan means any of the following issued after the date of enactment of this Act: (A) A loan issued under section 40106(e)(1)(B) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (42 U.S.C. 18713(e)(1)(B)). (B) A loan made for an eligible project described in paragraph (2)(B) under the Transmission Infrastructure Program of the Western Area Power Administration. (C) Any other loan made under a Department…
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Robert Peters

Illinois Senate · District 13 · D–IL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Robert Peters
Illinois Legislature · SB 4054

$DCEO-JTED

Feb 17, 2026 · Senate: Referred to Assignments

Sen. Robert Peters · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Appropriates $20,000,000 from the General Revenue Fund to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity for grants to the Job Training and Economic Development Program. Effective July 1, 2026.

The latest official Illinois General Assembly record shows this action on February 17, 2026: Senate: Referred to Assignments.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on Illinois's median household income.

Retained Illinois evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Appropriates $20,000,000 from the General Revenue Fund to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity for grants to the Job Training and Economic Development Program.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Illinois officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Illinois statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.