Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price14.14¢/kWh2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.805/gal2026-07 · #23 of 49 · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$156.092024 · #10 of 50 · highest first
Florida over time
Explore Florida readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Florida officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Florida effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Florida change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Florida · source units
FloridaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
27 of 27 reviewed Florida actions match · 27 date markers shown. 52 major events shown separately.
Florida · 2024: 14.14¢/kWh · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
FactVote combines EIA annual utility-scale generation with estimated small-scale solar generation, then groups sources into seven categories. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Florida, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. Small-scale solar generation is estimated by EIA. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Florida Residential electricity price · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Florida milestones include its constitutional wage schedule, fuel-tax holiday, housing and education laws, health and energy legislation, theft-law changes, budget approval and pandemic directives, where relevant to this topic. Statutory amounts and national estimates are not observed changes in Florida readings.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Florida · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Florida · 202414.14¢/kWh
Florida rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
FactVote combines EIA annual utility-scale generation with estimated small-scale solar generation, then groups sources into seven categories. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Florida, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. Small-scale solar generation is estimated by EIA. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Florida
2024 · Florida: 14.14¢/kWh · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Florida Residential electricity price history
Period
Florida
Compare
2015
11.58¢/kWh
2016
10.98¢/kWh
2017
11.61¢/kWh
2018
11.54¢/kWh
2019
11.7¢/kWh
2020
11.27¢/kWh
2021
11.9¢/kWh
2022
13.9¢/kWh
2023
15.21¢/kWh
2024
14.14¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Florida · 14.14¢/kWh2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida · your comparison
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Florida · 2024$156.09
Florida rank#10among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Florida
2024 · Florida: $156.09 · Rank #10 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Florida Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Florida
Compare
2010
$136.61
2011
$130.1
2012
$123.45
2013
$121.53
2014
$129.86
2015
$132.16
2016
$123.37
2017
$126.44
2018
$128.1
2019
$129.65
2020
$128.64
2021
$130.4
2022
$154.5
2023
$168.35
2024
$156.09
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Florida · $156.092024 · Rank #10 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida · your comparison
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Florida · 2024270.7 TWh
Florida rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
FactVote combines EIA annual utility-scale generation with estimated small-scale solar generation, then groups sources into seven categories. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Florida, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. Small-scale solar generation is estimated by EIA. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Florida
2024 · Florida: 270.7 TWh · Rank #2 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Florida Total electricity generation history
Period
Florida
Compare
2015
237.6 TWh
2016
238.5 TWh
2017
238.7 TWh
2018
244.7 TWh
2019
246.3 TWh
2020
251.9 TWh
2021
249.6 TWh
2022
261.5 TWh
2023
263.5 TWh
2024
270.7 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Florida · 270.7 TWh2024 · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida · your comparison
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Florida’s 2024 major storm outages differ sharply from ordinary-day outages.
Florida · 20241,487.6 min/year
Florida rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Florida
2024 · Florida: 1,487.6 min/year · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Florida Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Florida
Compare
2023
172.3 min/year
2024
1,487.6 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Florida · 1,487.6 min/year2024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida · your comparison
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Florida · 20241,183.3 trillion Btu
Florida rank#2among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Florida · 1,183.3 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #2 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida · your comparison
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Florida · 2024230.85 Mt CO₂
Florida rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Florida stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Florida has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Florida · 230.85 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Florida with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida · your comparison
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
27 of 27 reviewed Florida actions · newest first
Jul 22, 2026 · H.R.9843 · Enhancing Electric Grid Resilience Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Florida delegation · H.R.9843
Enhancing Electric Grid Resilience Act
Jul 22, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Kathy Castor · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would amend the Federal Power Act to authorize the allocation of the costs of certain interstate electric power transmission lines and electric power transmission lines that are located offshore, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
amend the Federal Power Act to authorize the allocation of the costs of certain interstate electric power transmission lines and electric power transmission lines that are located offshore, and for other purposes
This measure would require that new and existing data centers use off-grid power and water supplies, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Data center requirement for off-grid power and water supply Beginning on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a covered entity may not build, own, operate, or maintain a new data center or existing data center unless the data center derives all— (1) energy, including back-up energy, from a captive power plant, on-site power generation, or some other source or combination of sources separate from, and not deriving power from, the electric grid; and
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 14, 2026 · H.R.9084 · Department of Energy Nuclear Transparency Act · Committee actionU.S. Congress · Florida delegation · H.R.9084
Department of Energy Nuclear Transparency Act
Jul 14, 2026 · Committee action
Rep. Kathy Castor · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would increase transparency relating to the Department of Energy’s authorizations of certain nuclear facilities.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
119 HR 9084 IH: Department of Energy Nuclear Transparency Act U.S.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 24, 2026 · H.R.2986 · Expediting Generator Interconnection Procedures Act of 2025 · Committee actionU.S. Congress · Florida delegation · H.R.2986
Expediting Generator Interconnection Procedures Act of 2025
Jun 24, 2026 · Committee action
Rep. Kathy Castor · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to promulgate regulations that accelerate the interconnection of electric generation and storage resources to the transmission system through more efficient and effective interconnection procedures.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
119 HR 2986 IH: Expediting Generator Interconnection Procedures Act of 2025 U.S.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 14, 2026 · H.R.8812 · Build Nuclear with Local Materials Act of 2026 · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Florida delegation · H.R.8812
Build Nuclear with Local Materials Act of 2026
May 14, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Byron Donalds · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to allow the use of commercial-grade steel and concrete in non-safety-related structures at nuclear power plants, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to allow the use of commercial-grade steel and concrete in non-safety-related structures at nuclear power plants, and for other purposes
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 13, 2026 · H.R.8795 · American Families Gas Tax Relief Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Florida delegation · H.R.8795
American Families Gas Tax Relief Act
May 13, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would provide a fuel tax holiday.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses a gasoline-blend supply constraint or the federal gasoline tax, both components of retail fuel prices. It does not establish an effect on the displayed Florida price.
Retained Florida evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
119 HR 8795 IH: American Families Gas Tax Relief Act U.S.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Florida officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 2, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Florida candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
128 statements from 95 candidates
2026 Florida Commissioner of Agriculture — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
My philosophy is to fiercely protect Florida’s public and rural lands and agricultural heritage from overdevelopment. Left in their natural state, our lands keep an immense amount of climate pollution out of the atmosphere. FL loses an equivalent of 10 acres of natural and working lands every hour t…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The Florida Cabinet, acting as the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund, manages over 12 million acres of public lands. What is your philosophy on conservation, acquisition, and protection of natural resources, including Florida Forever projects, state parks, and coastal areas? El Gabinete de Florida, actuando como Junta de Fideicomisarios del Internal Improvement Trust Fund, administra más de 12 millones de acres de tierras públicas. ¿Cuál es su filosofía sobre la conservación, adquisición y protección de los recursos naturales, incluyendo proyectos de Florida Forever, parques estatales y zonas costeras?
Candidate questionnaire response
My philosophy is to fiercely protect Florida’s public and rural lands and agricultural heritage from overdevelopment. Left in their natural state, our lands keep an immense amount of climate pollution out of the atmosphere. FL loses an equivalent of 10 acres of natural and working lands every hour to development, and with them, the invaluable natural goods and services they provide. I also want to stop the rapid, unregulated sprawl of hyperscale AI data centers across Florida. AI data centers drive up electricity demand and costs, and strain water supplies from the Floridan aquifer: a single large data center can consume as much electricity as a small city. Working to ensure that recently enacted legislation prohibiting utility companies from passing the costs of AI grid upgrades onto consumers is actually enforced will be critical, however, massive developments in rural areas would still continue to threaten local habitats and natural resources.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Florida’s environment continues to face serious threats from corporations that prioritize short‑term profit over long‑term sustainability. As governor, I will halt state data‑center construction projects, which have been shown to damage groundwater, worsen air quality, and increase asthma‑related de…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: What actions can be taken to protect Florida's environment, water quality and coastlines from pollution, overdevelopment and climate change? ¿Qué acciones pueden tomarse para proteger el medio ambiente de Florida, la calidad del agua y las costas frente a la contaminación, el desarrollo excesivo y el cambio climático?
Candidate questionnaire response
Florida’s environment continues to face serious threats from corporations that prioritize short‑term profit over long‑term sustainability. As governor, I will halt state data‑center construction projects, which have been shown to damage groundwater, worsen air quality, and increase asthma‑related deaths. Our natural waterways must be restored and protected to ensure safe drinking water for Floridians and for the regions beyond our borders that rely on our water systems. The state can create public dashboards to track water quality and carbon emissions, expand cost‑share programs that help farms reduce chemical runoff, and establish a Florida Sustainable Agriculture Transition Fund to support small farmers shifting to sustainable practices. Overdevelopment and urban encroachment also threaten our ecosystems, which is why all affordable housing projects must be designed with climate resilience in mind.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Florida's future is inextricably tied to our natural resources, and I've championed these issues in the Legislature (PFAS monitoring, data center transparency, renewable energy goals, water management system evaluation to improve flood protection and long-term resiliency, carbon farming tax credit).…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: What actions can be taken to protect Florida's environment, water quality and coastlines from pollution, overdevelopment and climate change? ¿Qué acciones pueden tomarse para proteger el medio ambiente de Florida, la calidad del agua y las costas frente a la contaminación, el desarrollo excesivo y el cambio climático?
Candidate questionnaire response
Florida's future is inextricably tied to our natural resources, and I've championed these issues in the Legislature (PFAS monitoring, data center transparency, renewable energy goals, water management system evaluation to improve flood protection and long-term resiliency, carbon farming tax credit). Our beaches, springs, and waterways power tourism, fishing, agriculture, and property values. We can enforce clean water standards and hold polluters accountable for the nutrient runoff feeding toxic blue-green algae and red tide; continue Everglades and springs restoration; disincentivize overdevelopment of wetlands and aquifer recharge areas that absorb floodwaters; and invest in climate-resilient infrastructure (which along with clean energy, lowers utility bills–e.g. studies show every dollar invested in mitigation saves roughly six in disaster recovery, and resilient communities pay lower insurance premiums). In addition, I'd partner with Native tribes on environmental stewardship.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My administration will bring these citizens and experts together and empower them to drive the mission of protecting our Everglades, water, land, coastlines, and natural habitats from pollution, overdevelopment, and climate change.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Environment
Candidate questionnaire response
My administration will bring these citizens and experts together and empower them to drive the mission of protecting our Everglades, water, land, coastlines, and natural habitats from pollution, overdevelopment, and climate change.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Florida has excellent environmental advocacy groups and devoted citizens committed to advocating for and protecting our environment. We do not need to reinvent the wheel. My administration will bring these citizens and experts together and empower them to drive the mission of protecting our Everglad…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: What actions can be taken to protect Florida's environment, water quality and coastlines from pollution, overdevelopment and climate change? ¿Qué acciones pueden tomarse para proteger el medio ambiente de Florida, la calidad del agua y las costas frente a la contaminación, el desarrollo excesivo y el cambio climático?
Candidate questionnaire response
Florida has excellent environmental advocacy groups and devoted citizens committed to advocating for and protecting our environment. We do not need to reinvent the wheel. My administration will bring these citizens and experts together and empower them to drive the mission of protecting our Everglades, water, land, coastlines, and natural habitats from pollution, overdevelopment, and climate change. Hyperscale data centers threaten our environment on multiple levels: water, noise, and disrupting natural habitats. My administration will also empower environmental advocacy groups to protect our state from these threats.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Addressing climate change and the environment will be a top priority for my administration as our environment needs to be cleaned up and reinvigorated. I will make sure to take care of our unique ecosystem and address corporate greed that has destroyed our environment.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Florida Forward: A New Era of Leadership and Opportunity
Candidate campaign source
Addressing climate change and the environment will be a top priority for my administration as our environment needs to be cleaned up and reinvigorated. I will make sure to take care of our unique ecosystem and address corporate greed that has destroyed our environment.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
First and foremost, we have to get rid of the Republican stronghold in Florida. The Republicans in Florida moving in lockstep with the Trump Administration have decimated Florida’s environment. One idea to protect Florida’s environment is to address climate change at its source, greedy corporations.…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: What actions can be taken to protect Florida's environment, water quality and coastlines from pollution, overdevelopment and climate change? ¿Qué acciones pueden tomarse para proteger el medio ambiente de Florida, la calidad del agua y las costas frente a la contaminación, el desarrollo excesivo y el cambio climático?
Candidate questionnaire response
First and foremost, we have to get rid of the Republican stronghold in Florida. The Republicans in Florida moving in lockstep with the Trump Administration have decimated Florida’s environment. One idea to protect Florida’s environment is to address climate change at its source, greedy corporations. We can then start to clean up the environment and allow the environment time to recover by replenishing it and cease overdevelopment.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
HONORABLE MENTION: ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE Addressing climate change and the environment will be a top priority for my administration as our environment needs to be cleaned up and reinvigorated. I will make sure to take care of our unique ecosystem and address corporate greed that has destroyed our env…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Florida Forward: A New Era of Leadership and Opportunity
Candidate campaign source
HONORABLE MENTION: ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE Addressing climate change and the environment will be a top priority for my administration as our environment needs to be cleaned up and reinvigorated. I will make sure to take care of our unique ecosystem and address corporate greed that has destroyed our environment.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Florida's environment is one of our greatest assets. Our beaches, springs, wetlands, rivers, and coastlines support tourism, recreation, agriculture, and local communities. Protecting them requires stronger stewardship and long-term planning. Florida must accept the science of climate change and inv…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: What actions can be taken to protect Florida's environment, water quality and coastlines from pollution, overdevelopment and climate change? ¿Qué acciones pueden tomarse para proteger el medio ambiente de Florida, la calidad del agua y las costas frente a la contaminación, el desarrollo excesivo y el cambio climático?
Candidate questionnaire response
Florida's environment is one of our greatest assets. Our beaches, springs, wetlands, rivers, and coastlines support tourism, recreation, agriculture, and local communities. Protecting them requires stronger stewardship and long-term planning. Florida must accept the science of climate change and invest in resilience against sea level rise, stronger storms, flooding, and saltwater intrusion. Building resilient infrastructure today will protect communities and save taxpayers money in the future. I support stronger enforcement against polluters, investments in wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, and accelerated restoration of the Everglades, springs, rivers, and estuaries. We must reduce harmful algal blooms and ensure clean water for future generations. We also need smart growth policies that protect wetlands, beaches, state parks, and environmentally sensitive lands from overdevelopment.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Florida candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Florida incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Florida legislators and Florida’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Florida’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
22 matching sponsorships or proposals · 14 Florida incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Gov. Ron DeSantis
Governor of Florida · R–FL
1 proposalView proposals from Gov. Ron DeSantisGovernor · 2022 legislative proposal
Proposed more than $1 billion in gas-tax relief
Nov 22, 2021 · Proposed
Gov. Ron DeSantis · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Governor DeSantis proposed a state gas-tax holiday of more than $1 billion and said it could save the average Florida family up to $200. Legislative approval was required, so the announcement itself did not reduce the tax.
The Governor announced the proposal on November 22, 2021; the announcement required legislative action and did not itself change Florida tax law.
Why this record is included
The proposal directly sought to lower consumer gasoline costs through a state gas-tax holiday. The announcement did not itself change Florida law and does not explain the August 2026 price displayed on the card.
Retained Florida evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
I am proposing that during session, the Florida Legislature provide more than $1 billion in gas tax relief for Florida families.
Permits for Drilling, Exploration, and Extraction of Oil and Gas Resources
Jun 30, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 2025-193
Rep. Jason Shoaf · Sponsored / Rep. Allison Tant · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Permits for Drilling, Exploration, and Extraction of Oil and Gas Resources; Prohibits drilling, exploration, or production of specified petroleum products within certain distance of national estuarine research reserves in certain counties; requires DEP to consider certain factors when determining whether natural resources of certain bodies of water & shore areas are adequately protected from potential accident or blowout; provides requirements for balancing test to make such determination.
Approved by the Governor and filed with the Secretary of State June 26, 2025 as Chapter 2025-193; effective July 1, 2025. The bill history recorded its chapter entry June 30.
Why this record is included
The bill directly governs in-state petroleum exploration and extraction permits. It is fuel-supply context and does not establish an effect on the displayed retail gasoline price.
Retained Florida evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Permits for Drilling, Exploration, and Extraction of Oil and Gas Resources; Prohibits drilling, exploration, or production of specified petroleum products within certain distance of national estuarine research reserves in certain counties; requires DEP to consider certain factors when determining…
U.S. representative for Florida, District 13 · R–FL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Anna Paulina LunaU.S. Congress · Florida delegation · H.R.8795
American Families Gas Tax Relief Act
May 13, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would provide a fuel tax holiday.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses a gasoline-blend supply constraint or the federal gasoline tax, both components of retail fuel prices. It does not establish an effect on the displayed Florida price.
Retained Florida evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
119 HR 8795 IH: American Families Gas Tax Relief Act U.S.
U.S. representative for Florida, District 21 · R–FL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Brian J. MastU.S. Congress · Florida delegation · H.R.8519
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to waive Reid Vapor Pressure requirements with respect to calendar year 2026, and for other purposes.
Apr 27, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Brian J. Mast · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to waive Reid Vapor Pressure requirements with respect to calendar year 2026, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses a gasoline-blend supply constraint or the federal gasoline tax, both components of retail fuel prices. It does not establish an effect on the displayed Florida price.
Retained Florida evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Waiver Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with respect to the period beginning on May 1, 2026, and ending on September 15, 2026, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall waive the prohibition under section 211(h) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(h)) on the sale, offering for sale, dispensing, supply, offering for supply, transport, and introduction into commerce of gasoline the Reid Vapor Pressure of which exceeds the applicable standard. (b)
U.S. representative for Florida, District 19 · R–FL
4 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Byron DonaldsU.S. Congress · Florida delegation · H.R.9777
Protecting Ratepayers Act
Jul 20, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Byron Donalds · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would require that new and existing data centers use off-grid power and water supplies, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Data center requirement for off-grid power and water supply Beginning on the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a covered entity may not build, own, operate, or maintain a new data center or existing data center unless the data center derives all— (1) energy, including back-up energy, from a captive power plant, on-site power generation, or some other source or combination of sources separate from, and not deriving power from, the electric grid; and
This measure would require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to allow the use of commercial-grade steel and concrete in non-safety-related structures at nuclear power plants, and for other purposes.
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to allow the use of commercial-grade steel and concrete in non-safety-related structures at nuclear power plants, and for other purposes
This measure would codify certain Executive orders relating to nuclear energy.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Science, Space, and Technology, Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, Financial Services, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
codify certain Executive orders relating to nuclear energy
This measure would facilitate the development of a whole-of-government strategy for nuclear cooperation and nuclear exports.
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Science, Space, and Technology, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
119 HR 3626 IH: International Nuclear Energy Act of 2025 U.S.
U.S. representative for Florida, District 28 · R–FL
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Carlos A. GimenezU.S. Congress · Florida delegation · H.R.1167
Keep China Out of Solar Energy Act of 2025
Feb 10, 2025 · Introduced
Rep. Carlos A. Gimenez · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This measure would prohibit the procurement of solar panels manufactured or assembled in the People’s Republic of China.
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why this record is included
The federal measure directly addresses electricity generation, a generation technology, interconnection, grid reliability, or ratepayer policy relevant to Florida's electricity system. It does not establish an effect on the displayed generation mix.
Retained Florida evidence context: Electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
119 HR 1167 IH: Keep China Out of Solar Energy Act of 2025 U.S.
Only current Florida officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Florida statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 2, 2026.
Sources & methods
Each data section links to its primary source and states its reporting period, unit, definition, and comparison limits. All 50 states appear in comparison tables. D.C. and territories are excluded from ranks. Missing and suppressed observations stay unavailable; a missing value is never treated as zero.
Ranks use stored source precision, ordered highest to lowest. Equal values share the same rank (1, 2, 2, 4). Sampling error and reporting coverage can make nearby ranks unreliable. The U.S. benchmark uses the published national measure when it is available, rather than a simple average of state values.
Supplemental government datasets retrieved October 4, 2026. Existing reviewed datasets retain their original verification dates. Refreshing the page does not refresh an official data release.