Delaware · individual fact

Delaware budget, debt, and interest

Delaware state-government finances, comparable debt and interest figures, and the enacted budget.

The national companion measures federal finances. Here the unit is Delaware state government. Federal debt is not allocated to Delaware; a state budget is not the federal budget.

State debt outstanding$3.69BFY2024 · #44 of 50 · highest first
Interest expenditure$224.01MFY2024 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Total state tax collections$6.53BFY2024 · #41 of 50 · highest first

Delaware over time

Explore Delaware readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Delaware officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Delaware effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Delaware change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

No comparable time series is retained for this topic. The chart shows events and reviewed actions; current state comparisons appear below.

Delaware government actions Delaware · source units

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Events and reviewed actionsNo saved observations in this range.Sep 1, 2005Sep 30, 2026
✦ Major events & context · 57National context · Hurricane Katrina emergency appropriations · 2005-09-08Katrina relief fundingNational context · Medicare prescription drug benefit begins · 2006-01-01Medicare Part D beginsNational context · Iraq and Afghanistan war funding assessment · 2007-07-31War funding assessmentNational context · Economic Stimulus Act tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 tax rebatesNational context · Treasury support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac · 2008-09-07Fannie / Freddie supportNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Emergency stabilization law creates TARP · 2008-10-03TARP stabilizationNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Affordable Care Act changes health financing · 2010-03-23Health-care financing lawNational context · Tax extensions and payroll-tax relief · 2010-12-172010 tax / benefit dealNational context · Budget Control Act and debt-limit agreement · 2011-08-022011 budget agreementNational context · S&P lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2011-08-05S&P rating downgradeNational context · Fiscal-cliff tax agreement · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff agreementNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · Shutdown ends and debt limit is suspended · 2013-10-172013 funding / debt dealNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 · 2013-12-262013 budget caps dealNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 · 2015-11-022015 budget / debt dealNational context · Fed begins lifting rates after the crisis · 2015-12-16Fed rate normalizationNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 · 2018-02-092018 budget / debt dealNational context · 2018–19 partial government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 funding lapseNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 · 2019-08-022019 budget / debt dealNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and Treasury purchases · 2020-03-15Fed pandemic responseNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · Further pandemic relief and annual funding · 2020-12-27December pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure fundingNational context · Congress raises the debt limit after two impasses · 2021-12-162021 debt-limit increaseNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor funding and investment credits · 2022-08-09CHIPS fundingNational context · PACT Act expands veterans’ benefits · 2022-08-10Veterans’ benefits expansionNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes taxes and spending · 2022-08-16Energy / health / tax lawNational context · Student-loan cancellation cost recorded · 2022-09-30Loan-cost accountingNational context · Inflation and rates raise interest costs above forecasts · 2023-01-09Inflation / interest costsNational context · Fed reports suspension of Treasury payments · 2023-01-13Fed payments suspendedNational context · Disaster tax deadlines move into the next fiscal year · 2023-02-24Disaster tax deferralsNational context · Fiscal Responsibility Act · 2023-06-032023 debt-limit agreementNational context · Fitch lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2023-08-01Fitch rating downgradeNational context · Student-loan cost reversal lowers recorded outlays · 2023-08-31Loan-cost reversalNational context · National security supplemental funding · 2024-04-24Security supplementalDelaware · Delaware approves insurance coverage for pregnancy-termination services · 2024-09-09Pregnancy-termination coverage lawNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act becomes law · 2025-01-05Social Security benefitsNational context · Treasury begins extraordinary measures · 2025-01-21Debt-limit measuresNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02Tariffs / customs receiptsNational context · Moody’s lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2025-05-16Moody’s rating downgradeNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawDelaware · Delaware approves an affordable rental housing revolving-loan program · 2025-09-03Affordable rental housing fundDelaware · Delaware orders a transportation-funding review · 2025-09-26Transportation funding reviewNational context · 2025 federal government shutdown · 2025-10-012025 funding lapseDelaware · Delaware directs smart-growth and state-investment planning · 2026-01-30Smart-growth planningNational context · Supreme Court rejects IEEPA tariff authority · 2026-02-20Tariff authority rulingDelaware · Governor vetoes third-party electricity consumer-protection proposal · 2026-09-30Electricity protections vetoDelaware · Governor vetoes licensed school social-worker salary supplement · 2026-09-30School social-worker pay vetoDelaware · Governor vetoes school occupational-therapist pay proposal · 2026-09-30School therapist pay veto● Delaware Legislature · 63● U.S. Congress · Delaware delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 63■ Delaware agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-09-30

12 of 12 reviewed Delaware actions match · 8 date markers shown. 57 major events shown separately.

How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Delaware · state comparison

State debt and interest

Compare state-government balances and interest expenditure from the same Census fiscal-year survey.

Delaware · FY2024$3.69B
Delaware rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.1TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

State debt outstanding

Long-term debt outstanding plus short-term debt outstanding at fiscal year end.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Excludes local-government debt. Dollar ranks describe scale, not credit quality.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Delaware stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Delaware has a dark outline.

Lower value · $728.59MHigher value · $166.39BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Delaware · $3.69BFY2024 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Delaware with every state · 50 ranked
State debt outstanding · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$166.39B—
#2New York$120.59B—
#3Texas$70.05B—
#4Massachusetts$65.87B—
#5New Jersey$57.23B—
#6Pennsylvania$48.67B—
#7Illinois$43.38B—
#8Virginia$33.73B—
#9Connecticut$33.27B—
#10Ohio$32.29B—
#11Washington$30.62B—
#12Maryland$25.9B—
#13Michigan$25.02B—
#14Colorado$23.57B—
#15Wisconsin$22.79B—
#16Florida$20.14B—
#17Minnesota$17.03B—
#18Oregon$16.91B—
#19Louisiana$16.09B—
#20South Carolina$15.36B—
#21West Virginia$15.08B—
#22Georgia$14.05B—
#23North Carolina$13.13B—
#24Hawaii$11.72B—
#25Rhode Island$11.41B—
#26Alabama$10.99B—
#27Oklahoma$10.15B—
#28Kentucky$10.08B—
#29Tennessee$9.03B—
#30Indiana$8.52B—
#31Iowa$8.06B—
#32Arkansas$8.05B—
#33Mississippi$7.72B—
#34New Hampshire$7.58B—
#35Kansas$7.16B—
#36New Mexico$7.12B—
#37Missouri$6.99B—
#38Arizona$6.88B—
#39Alaska$5.72B—
#40Utah$5.55B—
#41Maine$5.3B—
#42North Dakota$4.89B—
#43South Dakota$4.67B—
#44Delaware · your comparison$3.69B—
#45Nebraska$3.39B—
#46Nevada$2.89B—
#47Montana$2.76B—
#48Vermont$2.67B—
#49Wyoming$1.26B—
#50Idaho$728.59M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Delaware · state comparison

Where state revenue comes from

All measures use Census state-government records for FY2024. Categories describe collections; they do not rank statutory tax rates.

Delaware · FY2024$0
Delaware rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$465.4BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

General sales-tax collections

Census category T09.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Delaware stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Delaware has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $54.35BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Delaware · $0FY2024 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Delaware with every state · 50 ranked
General sales-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas$54.35B—
#2California$53.33B—
#3Florida$40.09B—
#4Washington$22.81B—
#5New York$19.99B—
#6Ohio$16.33B—
#7Illinois$16.05B—
#8Pennsylvania$15.6B—
#9New Jersey$14.31B—
#10Tennessee$14.08B—
#11Arizona$13.16B—
#12Michigan$12.7B—
#13North Carolina$12.16B—
#14Indiana$10.96B—
#15Massachusetts$9.4B—
#16Georgia$9.01B—
#17Minnesota$8.49B—
#18Nevada$8.4B—
#19Wisconsin$7.59B—
#20Virginia$7.4B—
#21Maryland$6.85B—
#22South Carolina$6.44B—
#23Connecticut$6.23B—
#24Kentucky$5.8B—
#25Missouri$5.26B—
#26Mississippi$5.07B—
#27Arkansas$5.07B—
#28Louisiana$4.87B—
#29Hawaii$4.79B—
#30Colorado$4.67B—
#31Iowa$4.64B—
#32Utah$4.63B—
#33Alabama$4.59B—
#34Kansas$4.33B—
#35New Mexico$4.33B—
#36Oklahoma$3.81B—
#37Idaho$3.09B—
#38Nebraska$2.97B—
#39Maine$2.35B—
#40West Virginia$1.82B—
#41South Dakota$1.68B—
#42Rhode Island$1.63B—
#43Oregon$1.34B—
#44North Dakota$1.32B—
#45Wyoming$1.01B—
#46Vermont$597.33M—
#47Alaska$0—
#47Delaware · your comparison$0—
#47Montana$0—
#47New Hampshire$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Delaware · state comparison

Where state operating spending goes

Census categories allow consistent comparisons. These selected categories are not a breakdown of the current Delaware appropriations act.

Delaware · FY2024$3.97B
Delaware rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.02TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public welfare current operations

Current operations for public welfare institutions and other public welfare, excluding capital and transfers.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Delaware stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Delaware has a dark outline.

Lower value · $1.09BHigher value · $156.71BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Delaware · $3.97BFY2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Delaware with every state · 50 ranked
Public welfare current operations · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$156.71B—
#2New York$97.35B—
#3Texas$57.32B—
#4Illinois$41.13B—
#5Florida$40.11B—
#6Ohio$39.77B—
#7Pennsylvania$39.34B—
#8Massachusetts$34.12B—
#9North Carolina$30.64B—
#10New Jersey$28.06B—
#11Arizona$26.02B—
#12Michigan$24.37B—
#13Virginia$23.68B—
#14Minnesota$23.37B—
#15Indiana$22.93B—
#16Maryland$21.61B—
#17Kentucky$20.54B—
#18Oregon$20.47B—
#19Washington$19.6B—
#20Georgia$18.99B—
#21Louisiana$18.69B—
#22Tennessee$16.42B—
#23Wisconsin$16.26B—
#24Missouri$15.65B—
#25Oklahoma$14.57B—
#26Colorado$13.6B—
#27South Carolina$12.84B—
#28New Mexico$10.72B—
#29Iowa$10.26B—
#30Alabama$9.73B—
#31Arkansas$8.67B—
#32Mississippi$8.08B—
#33Utah$6.91B—
#34Kansas$6.84B—
#35Nevada$6.62B—
#36West Virginia$6.24B—
#37Maine$5.7B—
#38Nebraska$4.97B—
#39Connecticut$4.88B—
#40Rhode Island$4.54B—
#41Hawaii$4.14B—
#42Delaware · your comparison$3.97B—
#43Idaho$3.73B—
#44Alaska$3.27B—
#45Montana$2.89B—
#46New Hampshire$2.72B—
#47Vermont$2.69B—
#48North Dakota$2.09B—
#49South Dakota$1.95B—
#50Wyoming$1.09B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Delaware · state comparison

State operating costs and the enacted budget

The enacted plan, spending categories and audited activity use different periods and accounting scopes; they are kept separate.

Delaware · FY2024$9.24B
Delaware rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$2.04TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current operation expenditure

Sum of Census current-operation expenditure categories, excluding capital outlay, interest, and assistance/subsidy expenditure.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. This FY2024 comparison differs in scope and period from Delaware’s FY2027 appropriations and Fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 audit shown below.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Delaware stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Delaware has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.01BHigher value · $287.03BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Delaware · $9.24BFY2024 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Delaware with every state · 50 ranked
Current operation expenditure · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$287.03B—
#2New York$161.37B—
#3Texas$136.18B—
#4Florida$86.61B—
#5Pennsylvania$77.15B—
#6Illinois$75.67B—
#7Ohio$66.77B—
#8New Jersey$64.53B—
#9Massachusetts$61.38B—
#10North Carolina$59.01B—
#11Michigan$57.27B—
#12Virginia$53.45B—
#13Washington$49.82B—
#14Georgia$45.19B—
#15Maryland$45.06B—
#16Oregon$41.41B—
#17Arizona$38.71B—
#18Minnesota$38.1B—
#19Indiana$37.4B—
#20Kentucky$36.94B—
#21Wisconsin$34.5B—
#22Missouri$34.43B—
#23South Carolina$32.85B—
#24Colorado$32.73B—
#25Louisiana$31.67B—
#26Tennessee$31.12B—
#27Alabama$26.99B—
#28Oklahoma$24.28B—
#29Utah$22.7B—
#30New Mexico$21.94B—
#31Connecticut$21.22B—
#32Iowa$19.89B—
#33Kansas$18.39B—
#34Hawaii$16.62B—
#35Mississippi$16.46B—
#36Arkansas$16.28B—
#37West Virginia$13.19B—
#38Nevada$12.43B—
#39Nebraska$10.41B—
#40Maine$10.12B—
#41Delaware · your comparison$9.24B—
#42Rhode Island$8.93B—
#43Alaska$8.4B—
#44Idaho$8.21B—
#45New Hampshire$7.12B—
#46Montana$6.44B—
#47Vermont$6.28B—
#48North Dakota$5.63B—
#49South Dakota$4.55B—
#50Wyoming$4.01B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

FY2027 · Signed into law June 30, 2026

Enacted appropriations

$8.6B

Operating appropriations in Senate Bill 335 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2027. The exact total combines $6.997 billion from the General Fund, $1.134 billion in appropriated special funds, and $478.901 million in Trust Fund Operations. It excludes the separate one-time supplemental, bond and capital-improvements, and Grant-in-Aid acts, as well as non-appropriated special funds and federal spending outside this operating act.

Where State tax revenue comes from

FY2025 ACFR actual

Tax revenue reported as general revenue for Delaware's primary government on the government-wide Statement of Activities. The ACFR groups multiple business-related taxes into one line and reports State real-estate taxes separately; locally retained county and school-district property taxes are not consolidated into the State primary government.

Business taxes
$3.9B · 54.6%
Personal income tax
$2.4B · 32.9%
Real estate taxes
$907.5M · 12.6%
Other taxes
$111,000 · 0%

FY2027 operating budget by government group

FY2027 enacted operating budget

The three official summary groups in SB 335. General Fund, appropriated-special-fund, and Trust Fund Operations amounts are combined within each group, and the exact totals reconcile to the $8.609 billion operating-budget headline.

State departments
$5.8B · 66.8%
Public education
$2.5B · 29.3%
Higher education
$330.3M · 3.8%

Audited government-wide results

Fiscal year ended June 30, 2025
Revenue
$14.5B
Expenses
$13.9B

Government-wide revenue and expenses for Delaware's primary government on the accrual basis, combining governmental and business-type activities and excluding component units. Revenue is charges for services, operating grants and contributions, tax and other general revenue; transfers between primary-government columns cancel.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt from FactVote’s Delaware candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

10 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Delaware State Treasurer — Democratic Primary

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Democratic · State Treasurer · DE

Budgets, spending & debt

Maintain our state’s AAA credit rating, which helps lower our debt payments, allowing more of our state's budget to go toward reducing the cost burden of housing, energy, and other living expenses

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Democracy, ethics, and the rule of law

Candidate campaign source

Maintain our state’s AAA credit rating, which helps lower our debt payments, allowing more of our state's budget to go toward reducing the cost burden of housing, energy, and other living expenses

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael Alexander Smith — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Michael Alexander Smith
Budgets, spending & debt

Ensure that our state stands ready in the face of any future federal funding disruptions, particularly for big-budget items like Medicaid, SNAP, transportation, and education

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Ensure that our state stands ready in the face of any future federal funding disruptions, particularly for big-budget items like Medicaid, SNAP, transportation, and education

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael Alexander Smith — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Mike Miller

1 statement

Democratic · State Treasurer · DE

Budgets, spending & debt

"As State Treasurer, I will work to strengthen financial literacy programs, promote fiscal responsibility, and ensure Delaware's financial future remains strong and secure."

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

"As State Treasurer, I will work to strengthen financial literacy programs, promote fiscal responsibility, and ensure Delaware's financial future remains strong and secure."

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Mike Miller — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Delaware U.S. House — Republican Primary

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Republican · U.S. House · DE

Budgets, spending & debt

Private debt is a far greater problem than even Public Debt. (Private debt has triggered virtually all financial crises, including the 1929 crash and Global Financial Crisis of 2008-9.) It holds back individuals, families and businesses, and has led to a stagnant economy since 2008. The average Amer…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Private debt is a far greater problem than even Public Debt. (Private debt has triggered virtually all financial crises, including the 1929 crash and Global Financial Crisis of 2008-9.) It holds back individuals, families and businesses, and has led to a stagnant economy since 2008. The average American's private debt is $72,200. (Total household debt - about $19 trillion - divided by total population 21 years of age or older equals $72,200.) There is only one responsible way to deleverage now — a Debt Jubilee that makes both debtors and creditors whole, and treats the debt-free equally, all without inflation.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joseph "Dr. Joe" Arminio — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
View 2 more statements from Joseph "Dr. Joe" Arminio
Budgets, spending & debt

Foreigners hold $9.35 trillion of US national debt. It's time to levy a financial transaction tax on the trade of US stocks, as was done from 1914 to 1966. Consequently, foreign holdings of US debt can be reduced by 80% in 30 years.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Foreigners hold $9.35 trillion of US national debt. It's time to levy a financial transaction tax on the trade of US stocks, as was done from 1914 to 1966. Consequently, foreign holdings of US debt can be reduced by 80% in 30 years.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joseph "Dr. Joe" Arminio — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
Budgets, spending & debt

Domestic holdings of U.S. national debt amounts to $21.91 trillion. Intragovernment debt, including Social Security, amounts to $7.65 trillion. It's time for the Treasury Department to emit "Greenbacks," of the type that the GOP-led Civil War Congress and Lincoln Administration emitted to help win t…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Retirement security and Social Security

Candidate campaign source

Domestic holdings of U.S. national debt amounts to $21.91 trillion. Intragovernment debt, including Social Security, amounts to $7.65 trillion. It's time for the Treasury Department to emit "Greenbacks," of the type that the GOP-led Civil War Congress and Lincoln Administration emitted to help win the war. This will reduce domestic holdings of national debt to $13.96 trillion in 5 years and will eliminate Intragovernment debt in 20 years.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joseph "Dr. Joe" Arminio — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗

2026 Delaware U.S. Senate — Democratic Primary

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Chris Coons

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. Senate · DE

Budgets, spending & debt

American foreign policy is fundamentally about ensuring our security and protecting our prosperity. That is why Chris has worked across the aisle to ensure we have the tools and strategy to compete with China and he remains committed to standing with Ukrainians in their fight for freedom. He is the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, technology, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

American foreign policy is fundamentally about ensuring our security and protecting our prosperity. That is why Chris has worked across the aisle to ensure we have the tools and strategy to compete with China and he remains committed to standing with Ukrainians in their fight for freedom. He is the senior Democrat for Defense Appropriations in the Senate, where he has delivered investments for our troops and ensured America stands ready to face the battles of tomorrow.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Chris Coons — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Democratic · U.S. Senate · DE

Budgets, spending & debt

A federal balanced-budget requirement — we shouldn't spend more than we have.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

A federal balanced-budget requirement — we shouldn't spend more than we have.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

E. No-Trump Hansen — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt terms in retained, attributed source text from published Delaware candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Delaware incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Delaware legislators and Delaware’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Delaware’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

13 matching sponsorships or proposals · 12 Delaware incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Debra Heffernan

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Debra Heffernan
Delaware Legislature · HB 393

Governor vetoes third-party electricity consumer-protection proposal

Sep 30, 2026 · Vetoed · Proposed provisions not enacted

Rep. Debra Heffernan · Sponsored / Sen. Stephanie L. Hansen · Named bill author / Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Burns · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. Alonna Berry · Co-sponsored / Rep. Richard G. Collins · Co-sponsored / Rep. Larry Lambert · Co-sponsored / Rep. Sophie Phillips · Co-sponsored / Rep. Claire Snyder-Hall · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mara Gorman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kimberly Williams · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kerri Evelyn Harris · Co-sponsored / Sen. Marie Pinkney · Co-sponsored / Sen. Russell Huxtable · Co-sponsored / Sen. S. Elizabeth Lockman · Co-sponsored

Reviewed vetoed proposal

The May 4 fiscal note projected FY2027 appropriated-special-fund recurring costs of $86,605 plus $107,000 one-time costs, followed by recurring costs of $117,214 in FY2028 and $119,526 in FY2029. These were proposal estimates before House Amendment 1, not enacted appropriations or actual spending. HB 393, with House Amendment 1, proposed Public Service Commission training and certification, monthly third-party electricity supplier cost and rate reports, and customer contract protections. Enrollment confirmation would be due within 15 business days, rate-change notice at least 15 days in advance, and renewal notices 90 and 30 days before expiration with affirmative written or electronic agreement. Residential nonrenewable offers would be capped at the utility’s trailing 12-month average standard-offer rate when the customer agreed. The proposal also limited contract terms and seasonal variable rates, prohibited specified fees and enrollment commissions, and expressly allowed time-of-use rates. Vetoed September 30, 2026; these provisions were proposed, not enacted by this bill. The complete retained history contains no override or later enactment. The original veto message has not been retained, so the governor’s reasons are not asserted. No measured change in prices, pay, spending or outcomes is established. The Section 218 exception concerned fines or imprisonment under that particular section for licensed individual electricity sales agents; it was not general immunity. The May 4 fiscal note predates House Amendment 1 and estimates administrative costs, not an appropriation or spending caused by the veto.

Vetoed September 30, 2026. Proposed provisions were not enacted by this bill; no override is recorded in the complete retained history.

Why this record is included

The May 4 fiscal note projected FY2027 appropriated-special-fund recurring costs of $86,605 plus $107,000 one-time costs, followed by recurring costs of $117,214 in FY2028 and $119,526 in FY2029. These were proposal estimates before House Amendment 1, not enacted appropriations or actual spending. Vetoed September 30, 2026; these provisions were proposed, not enacted by this bill. The complete retained history contains no override or later enactment. The original veto message has not been retained, so the governor’s reasons are not asserted. No measured change in prices, pay, spending or outcomes is established. The Section 218 exception concerned fines or imprisonment under that particular section for licensed individual electricity sales agents; it was not general immunity. The May 4 fiscal note predates House Amendment 1 and estimates administrative costs, not an appropriation or spending caused by the veto.

Retained Delaware evidence context: deficit-debt-interest · reviewed Delaware policy context · energy · reviewed Delaware policy context · cpi · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Fiscal Year 2027: $86,605 $107,000
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Delaware Legislature · HS 2 for HB 110

Delaware approves insurance coverage for pregnancy-termination services

Sep 9, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 84:402

Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown · Sponsored / Rep. Debra Heffernan · Sponsored / Rep. William Bush · Sponsored / Sen. Bryan Townsend · Sponsored / Rep. Kendra Johnson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Kyra L. Hoffner · Co-sponsored / Sen. Marie Pinkney · Co-sponsored / Sen. Stephanie L. Hansen · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HS 2 for HB 110, enacted as Volume 84, Chapter 402, requires specified Medicaid, private-insurance and state-employee plans to cover lawful pregnancy-termination services. Medicaid coverage has a $750 annual per-person maximum; specified private plans may apply that cap. Covered services generally have no cost sharing, with express federal-plan-status exceptions. Medicaid services use federal funds when permitted and state funds otherwise. Medicaid and state-employee provisions start January 1, 2025. Private-policy applicability follows issuance, renewal or specified policy changes after December 31, 2025. Plan coverage, network requirements, eligible religious-employer exclusions and federal-plan-status exceptions remain. Approval does not establish care delivered, actual program spending or improved health outcomes.

Chapter 84:402 signed 2024-09-09. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

HS 2 for HB 110, enacted as Volume 84, Chapter 402, requires specified Medicaid, private-insurance and state-employee plans to cover lawful pregnancy-termination services. Medicaid coverage has a $750 annual per-person maximum; specified private plans may apply that cap. Covered services generally have no cost sharing, with express federal-plan-status exceptions. Medicaid services use federal funds when permitted and state funds otherwise. Medicaid and state-employee provisions start January 1, 2025. Private-policy applicability follows issuance, renewal or specified policy changes after December 31, 2025. Plan coverage, network requirements, eligible religious-employer exclusions and federal-plan-status exceptions remain. Approval does not establish care delivered, actual program spending or improved health outcomes.

Retained Delaware evidence context: Abortions reported by area of occurrence · health · reviewed Delaware policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sections 1 and 5 of this Act take effect January 1 of the year following enactment.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Kamela T Smith

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kamela T Smith
Delaware Legislature · SB 279

Governor vetoes school occupational-therapist pay proposal

Sep 30, 2026 · Vetoed · Proposed provisions not enacted

Sen. Nicole Poore · Sponsored / Rep. Kamela T Smith · Sponsored / Sen. Kyra L. Hoffner · Co-sponsored / Sen. John "Jack" Walsh · Co-sponsored / Sen. David L. Wilson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Alonna Berry · Co-sponsored / Rep. Larry Lambert · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. Melanie Ross Levin · Co-sponsored

Reviewed vetoed proposal

The April 22 fiscal note projected FY2027 state costs of $119,286 and local costs of $104,449, with a reported total of $223,736. The reported total is $1 above the displayed components’ sum. Costs were estimates for the vetoed proposal, not enacted appropriations or actual spending. SB 279 proposed salary-schedule placement for school occupational therapists who passed the NBCOT examination and held a current Delaware license. A therapist with an occupational-therapy master’s degree and no occupational-therapy doctorate would receive the higher of Masters Plus 30 credits or their current pay grade. A qualifying occupational-therapy doctorate would receive the doctor’s-degree base salary level, with additional coursework eligible for rightward movement on the indexed scale. Vetoed September 30, 2026; these provisions were proposed, not enacted by this bill. The complete retained history contains no override or later enactment. The original veto message has not been retained, so the governor’s reasons are not asserted. No measured change in prices, pay, spending or outcomes is established. This was a salary-placement proposal for covered school staff, not a blanket raise, a hiring requirement, or a health-insurance expansion. The fiscal note’s inflation assumptions are forecast inputs, not measured CPI.

Vetoed September 30, 2026. Proposed provisions were not enacted by this bill; no override is recorded in the complete retained history.

Why this record is included

The April 22 fiscal note projected FY2027 state costs of $119,286 and local costs of $104,449, with a reported total of $223,736. The reported total is $1 above the displayed components’ sum. Costs were estimates for the vetoed proposal, not enacted appropriations or actual spending. Vetoed September 30, 2026; these provisions were proposed, not enacted by this bill. The complete retained history contains no override or later enactment. The original veto message has not been retained, so the governor’s reasons are not asserted. No measured change in prices, pay, spending or outcomes is established. This was a salary-placement proposal for covered school staff, not a blanket raise, a hiring requirement, or a health-insurance expansion. The fiscal note’s inflation assumptions are forecast inputs, not measured CPI.

Retained Delaware evidence context: education · reviewed Delaware policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed Delaware policy context · income-taxes · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Fiscal Year 2027: $119,286 $104,449 $223,736
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Kendra Johnson

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kendra Johnson
Delaware Legislature · SB 150

Delaware approves an affordable rental housing revolving-loan program

Sep 3, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 85:209

Sen. Russell Huxtable · Sponsored / Sen. S. Elizabeth Lockman · Sponsored / Rep. Kendra Johnson · Sponsored / Sen. Kyra L. Hoffner · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ray Seigfried · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Rep. Frank Burns · Co-sponsored / Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mara Gorman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Krista Griffith · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jeff Hilovsky · Co-sponsored / Rep. Larry Lambert · Co-sponsored / Rep. Claire Snyder-Hall · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 150, enacted as Volume 85, Chapter 209, creates an affordable rental housing revolving-loan program within the Housing Development Fund. It supports eligible rental projects, interest credits to a 1% payment rate and rents capped at the lesser of basic rent or 30% of a tenant’s adjusted income. Loans may be amortized for up to 50 years but have payment terms of no more than 30 years. The rent rule applies to financed housing projects, rather than all Delaware rentals. Eligibility, appropriations and DSHA policies govern operation; approval does not prove funded loans, built units, lower statewide rents, issued debt or a measured fiscal balance change.

Chapter 85:209 signed 2025-09-03. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

SB 150, enacted as Volume 85, Chapter 209, creates an affordable rental housing revolving-loan program within the Housing Development Fund. It supports eligible rental projects, interest credits to a 1% payment rate and rents capped at the lesser of basic rent or 30% of a tenant’s adjusted income. Loans may be amortized for up to 50 years but have payment terms of no more than 30 years. The rent rule applies to financed housing projects, rather than all Delaware rentals. Eligibility, appropriations and DSHA policies govern operation; approval does not prove funded loans, built units, lower statewide rents, issued debt or a measured fiscal balance change.

Retained Delaware evidence context: Median gross rent · housing-borrowing · reviewed Delaware policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

DSHA must provide interest credit to subsidize the interest on ARHP loans to a payment rate of 1%.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown
Delaware Legislature · HS 2 for HB 110

Delaware approves insurance coverage for pregnancy-termination services

Sep 9, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 84:402

Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown · Sponsored / Rep. Debra Heffernan · Sponsored / Rep. William Bush · Sponsored / Sen. Bryan Townsend · Sponsored / Rep. Kendra Johnson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Kyra L. Hoffner · Co-sponsored / Sen. Marie Pinkney · Co-sponsored / Sen. Stephanie L. Hansen · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HS 2 for HB 110, enacted as Volume 84, Chapter 402, requires specified Medicaid, private-insurance and state-employee plans to cover lawful pregnancy-termination services. Medicaid coverage has a $750 annual per-person maximum; specified private plans may apply that cap. Covered services generally have no cost sharing, with express federal-plan-status exceptions. Medicaid services use federal funds when permitted and state funds otherwise. Medicaid and state-employee provisions start January 1, 2025. Private-policy applicability follows issuance, renewal or specified policy changes after December 31, 2025. Plan coverage, network requirements, eligible religious-employer exclusions and federal-plan-status exceptions remain. Approval does not establish care delivered, actual program spending or improved health outcomes.

Chapter 84:402 signed 2024-09-09. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

HS 2 for HB 110, enacted as Volume 84, Chapter 402, requires specified Medicaid, private-insurance and state-employee plans to cover lawful pregnancy-termination services. Medicaid coverage has a $750 annual per-person maximum; specified private plans may apply that cap. Covered services generally have no cost sharing, with express federal-plan-status exceptions. Medicaid services use federal funds when permitted and state funds otherwise. Medicaid and state-employee provisions start January 1, 2025. Private-policy applicability follows issuance, renewal or specified policy changes after December 31, 2025. Plan coverage, network requirements, eligible religious-employer exclusions and federal-plan-status exceptions remain. Approval does not establish care delivered, actual program spending or improved health outcomes.

Retained Delaware evidence context: Abortions reported by area of occurrence · health · reviewed Delaware policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sections 1 and 5 of this Act take effect January 1 of the year following enactment.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha
Delaware Legislature · SB 231

Governor vetoes licensed school social-worker salary supplement

Sep 30, 2026 · Vetoed · Proposed provisions not enacted

Sen. Marie Pinkney · Sponsored / Rep. Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha · Sponsored / Sen. Stephanie L. Hansen · Co-sponsored / Sen. Kyra L. Hoffner · Co-sponsored / Sen. Russell Huxtable · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ray Seigfried · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Laura V. Sturgeon · Co-sponsored / Rep. Alonna Berry · Co-sponsored / Rep. Debra Heffernan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Larry Lambert · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Rep. Melanie Ross Levin · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kamela T Smith · Co-sponsored / Rep. Claire Snyder-Hall · Co-sponsored

Reviewed vetoed proposal

The March 9 revised fiscal note projected costs of $343,389 in FY2027, $363,993 in FY2028 and $371,272 in FY2029. These were estimates for the vetoed salary proposal, not enacted appropriations or actual spending. SB 231 proposed adding school social workers who passed the ASWB National Clinical Examination and held an LCSW license to the staff eligible for a supplement equal to 6% of the state base salary under Section 1305. It also made technical drafting corrections. The separate 12% National Board teaching-certification supplement appeared as existing statutory context and was not the proposed social-worker supplement. Vetoed September 30, 2026; these provisions were proposed, not enacted by this bill. The complete retained history contains no override or later enactment. The original veto message has not been retained, so the governor’s reasons are not asserted. No measured change in prices, pay, spending or outcomes is established. This was compensation for eligible school social workers, not health-insurance coverage or a measured improvement in student health. The revised fiscal note’s salary-growth and inflation assumptions are forecast inputs, distinct from the proposed 6% base-salary supplement.

Vetoed September 30, 2026. Proposed provisions were not enacted by this bill; no override is recorded in the complete retained history.

Why this record is included

The March 9 revised fiscal note projected costs of $343,389 in FY2027, $363,993 in FY2028 and $371,272 in FY2029. These were estimates for the vetoed salary proposal, not enacted appropriations or actual spending. Vetoed September 30, 2026; these provisions were proposed, not enacted by this bill. The complete retained history contains no override or later enactment. The original veto message has not been retained, so the governor’s reasons are not asserted. No measured change in prices, pay, spending or outcomes is established. This was compensation for eligible school social workers, not health-insurance coverage or a measured improvement in student health. The revised fiscal note’s salary-growth and inflation assumptions are forecast inputs, distinct from the proposed 6% base-salary supplement.

Retained Delaware evidence context: education · reviewed Delaware policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed Delaware policy context · income-taxes · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Fiscal Year 2027: $343,389
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. William Bush

Delaware House of Representatives · D–DE

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. William Bush
Delaware Legislature · HS 2 for HB 110

Delaware approves insurance coverage for pregnancy-termination services

Sep 9, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 84:402

Rep. Melissa Minor-Brown · Sponsored / Rep. Debra Heffernan · Sponsored / Rep. William Bush · Sponsored / Sen. Bryan Townsend · Sponsored / Rep. Kendra Johnson · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Morrison · Co-sponsored / Rep. DeShanna U Neal · Co-sponsored / Rep. Cyndie Romer · Co-sponsored / Sen. David P. Sokola · Co-sponsored / Sen. Kyra L. Hoffner · Co-sponsored / Sen. Marie Pinkney · Co-sponsored / Sen. Stephanie L. Hansen · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HS 2 for HB 110, enacted as Volume 84, Chapter 402, requires specified Medicaid, private-insurance and state-employee plans to cover lawful pregnancy-termination services. Medicaid coverage has a $750 annual per-person maximum; specified private plans may apply that cap. Covered services generally have no cost sharing, with express federal-plan-status exceptions. Medicaid services use federal funds when permitted and state funds otherwise. Medicaid and state-employee provisions start January 1, 2025. Private-policy applicability follows issuance, renewal or specified policy changes after December 31, 2025. Plan coverage, network requirements, eligible religious-employer exclusions and federal-plan-status exceptions remain. Approval does not establish care delivered, actual program spending or improved health outcomes.

Chapter 84:402 signed 2024-09-09. Signing, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

HS 2 for HB 110, enacted as Volume 84, Chapter 402, requires specified Medicaid, private-insurance and state-employee plans to cover lawful pregnancy-termination services. Medicaid coverage has a $750 annual per-person maximum; specified private plans may apply that cap. Covered services generally have no cost sharing, with express federal-plan-status exceptions. Medicaid services use federal funds when permitted and state funds otherwise. Medicaid and state-employee provisions start January 1, 2025. Private-policy applicability follows issuance, renewal or specified policy changes after December 31, 2025. Plan coverage, network requirements, eligible religious-employer exclusions and federal-plan-status exceptions remain. Approval does not establish care delivered, actual program spending or improved health outcomes.

Retained Delaware evidence context: Abortions reported by area of occurrence · health · reviewed Delaware policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed Delaware policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sections 1 and 5 of this Act take effect January 1 of the year following enactment.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Delaware officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Delaware statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.