Colorado · individual fact

Colorado real gross domestic product

Colorado’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$452.78B2025 · #15 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth1.9%2025 · #27 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$574.86B2025 · #17 of 50 · highest first

Colorado over time

Explore Colorado readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Colorado officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Colorado effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Colorado change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP Colorado · source units
ColoradoPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $452.78B$0$13.39T$26.78TColorado, 2014: $315.4BColorado, 2015: $330.53BColorado, 2016: $337.69BColorado, 2017: $350.21BColorado, 2018: $365.18BColorado, 2019: $383.67BColorado, 2020: $379.58BColorado, 2021: $405.09BColorado, 2022: $422.37BColorado, 2023: $437.24BColorado, 2024: $444.47BColorado, 2025: $452.78B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 30National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawColorado · Colorado orders a response to tariff-related costs · 2025-07-14Colorado tariff responseNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● Colorado Legislature · 4● U.S. Congress · Colorado delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 5■ Colorado agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-05-31

9 of 9 reviewed Colorado actions match · 9 date markers shown. 30 major events shown separately.

Colorado · 2025: $452.78B · Rank #15 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Colorado Real GDP · source units
PeriodColoradoRankU.S. benchmark
2025$452.78B#15 of 50$23.94T
2024$444.47B#16 of 50$23.39T
2023$437.24B#15 of 50$22.72T
2022$422.37B#15 of 50$22.08T
2021$405.09B#16 of 50$21.56T
2020$379.58B#16 of 50$20.28T
2019$383.67B#16 of 50$20.72T
2018$365.18B#17 of 50$20.19T
2017$350.21B#19 of 50$19.61T
2016$337.69B#19 of 50$19.14T
2015$330.53B#19 of 50$18.8T
2014$315.4B#19 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Colorado · state comparison

Colorado output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

Colorado · 2025$452.78B
Colorado rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Colorado
Real GDP history in Colorado$-3.23T$12.13T$27.49T20142025
2025 · Colorado: $452.78B · Rank #15 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Colorado Real GDP history
PeriodColoradoCompare
2014$315.4B
2015$330.53B
2016$337.69B
2017$350.21B
2018$365.18B
2019$383.67B
2020$379.58B
2021$405.09B
2022$422.37B
2023$437.24B
2024$444.47B
2025$452.78B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · $452.78B2025 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado · your comparison$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Colorado · state comparison

What makes up Colorado GDP?

Choose an industry to compare Colorado’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

Colorado · 2025$2.98B
Colorado rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Colorado
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in Colorado$-41.75B$147.72B$337.19B20142025
2025 · Colorado: $2.98B · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Colorado Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodColoradoCompare
2014$2.73B
2015$2.8B
2016$2.62B
2017$2.36B
2018$2.49B
2019$2.53B
2020$1.98B
2021$3.08B
2022$3.46B
2023$3.4B
2024$2.79B
2025$2.98B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · $2.98B2025 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado · your comparison$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Colorado · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

Colorado · 20254,231,488
Colorado rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Colorado
Total employment · jobs history in Colorado-28,759,924110,896,603250,553,12920142025
2025 · Colorado: 4,231,488 · Rank #17 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Colorado Total employment · jobs history
PeriodColoradoCompare
20143,468,505
20153,575,100
20163,667,914
20173,762,338
20183,860,118
20193,897,232
20203,825,093
20213,992,311
20224,113,685
20234,205,168
20244,230,209
20254,231,488

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · 4,231,4882025 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado · your comparison4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Colorado candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

7 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Colorado Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Michael J. Allen

1 statement

Republican · Attorney General · CO

Economic growth & production context

Protecting our water, and growing our economy, are not competing goals. A reliable and healthy water supply is an economic asset that gives farmers, ranchers, businesses, and communities the confidence to invest in Colorado’s future. That means pursuing responsible conservation, improving infrastruc…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Protecting Colorado’s Water Rights

Candidate campaign source

Protecting our water, and growing our economy, are not competing goals. A reliable and healthy water supply is an economic asset that gives farmers, ranchers, businesses, and communities the confidence to invest in Colorado’s future. That means pursuing responsible conservation, improving infrastructure, embracing technology, expanding storage where appropriate, and using water reuse and other innovative solutions when they make sense.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Michael J. Allen campaign source ↗

2026 Colorado Governor / Lt. Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Greg Lopez

2 statements

Unaffiliated · Governor / Lt. Governor · CO

Economic growth & production context

My administration will work to balance environmental stewardship with practical access policies that support both conservation and economic growth.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, technology, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

My administration will work to balance environmental stewardship with practical access policies that support both conservation and economic growth.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Greg Lopez — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Greg Lopez
Economic growth & production context

As the Mayor and city manager of Parker, I instituted practical solutions that improved roads, reduced commute times, supported economic growth and respected both urban and rural transportation needs. I will do the same for the state.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

As the Mayor and city manager of Parker, I instituted practical solutions that improved roads, reduced commute times, supported economic growth and respected both urban and rural transportation needs. I will do the same for the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Greg Lopez — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Victor Marx

1 statement

Republican · Governor / Lt. Governor · CO

Economic growth & production context

If elected Governor, I will prioritize economic development incentives for advanced manufacturing, clean-tech production, and outdoor-recreation industries under C.R.S. § 24-48.5-101 et seq. These incentives will include targeted tax credits, expedited permitting support, and eligibility for job-ret…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

If elected Governor, I will prioritize economic development incentives for advanced manufacturing, clean-tech production, and outdoor-recreation industries under C.R.S. § 24-48.5-101 et seq. These incentives will include targeted tax credits, expedited permitting support, and eligibility for job-retention workforce grants. These sectors are foundational to Colorado’s economy and essential to rural and urban employment alike. Strengthening innovation and outdoor recreation ensures diversified growth, enhances statewide competitiveness, and supports long-term economic resilience.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Colorado U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Joe Neguse

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · CO

Economic growth & production context

Every student should be able to obtain a quality public-school education. To support Colorado’s rural and mountain communities, Joe introduced and enacted legislation to support rural schools through funds for supplies, building improvements and more. To support college students, Joe is sponsoring m…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Every student should be able to obtain a quality public-school education. To support Colorado’s rural and mountain communities, Joe introduced and enacted legislation to support rural schools through funds for supplies, building improvements and more. To support college students, Joe is sponsoring measures to expand the use of free, open-access textbooks and make the transfer process easier for students at community college. Joe has also sponsored measures to ensure that every public higher education graduate finishes debt-free, and to protect the internet as a vital tool for innovation and economic growth by reinstituting net neutrality and preserving internet freedom. Joe also continues to fight for increasing teacher pay, federal Title I funding for low-income students, and federal Title II funding for teacher training, and during the House appropriations process, he successfully worked with his colleagues to secure millions of dollars in increased funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to ensure every student is set up to succeed, regardless of their background or abilities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joe Neguse — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Colorado candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Colorado incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Colorado legislators and Colorado’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Colorado’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

14 matching sponsorships or proposals · 10 Colorado incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Julie McCluskie

Colorado House of Representatives, District 13 · D–CO

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Julie McCluskie
Colorado Legislature · HB26-1065

Transit and Housing Investment Zones

May 27, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Julie McCluskie · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Woodrow · Sponsored / Sen. Dylan Roberts · Sponsored / Sen. Tony Exum · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB26-1065: Transit and Housing Investment Zones. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires the Colorado office of economic development, in consultation with the department of local affairs and the department of transportation, to publish a transit and housing investment zone map on or before October 30, 2026. The act creates the Colorado affordable housing in transit and housing investment zones tax credit (tax credit). The tax credit is administered in the same manner as the Colorado affordable housing in transit-oriented communities income tax credit; except that the tax credit is awarded in connection with housing projects in transit and housing zones. The act authorizes the Colorado Housing and Finance Authority to allocate up to $8,333,333 in tax credits each calendar year beginning in the 2027 calendar year through the 2033 calendar year. For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $213,349 to the office of the governor for use by economic development programs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2026-05-27: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act requires the Colorado office of economic development, in consultation with the department of local affairs and the department of transportation, to publish a transit and housing investment zone map on or before October 30, 2026. The act creates the Colorado affordable housing in transit and housing investment zones tax credit (tax credit). The tax credit is administered in the same manner as the Colorado affordable housing in transit-oriented communities income tax credit; except that the tax credit is awarded in connection with housing projects in transit and housing zones. The act authorizes the Colorado Housing and Finance Authority to allocate up to $8,333,333 in tax credits each calendar year beginning in the 2027 calendar year through the 2033 calendar year. For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $213,349 to the office of the governor for use by economic development programs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Colorado Legislature · HB23-1304

Proposition 123 Affordable Housing Programs

Jun 5, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Julie McCluskie · Sponsored / Sen. Lisa Frizell · Sponsored / Sen. Dylan Roberts · Sponsored / Sen. Tony Exum · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB23-1304: Proposition 123 Affordable Housing Programs. Official enacted-bill summary: The act modifies the affordable housing programs (programs) created by Proposition 123, which was approved by voters at the 2022 statewide election, by: Allowing tribal governments to participate in the programs; Requiring the division of local government, rather than the division of housing, to administer the land planning capacity development program; Allowing the office of economic development (office) to use a portion of the money in the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund) for its administrative expenses, without increasing the total amount of money from the fund that may be used for administrative expenses; Modifying the calculation for determining eligibility for some of the programs; Clarifying the description of how money is transferred or allocated; Specifying certain units to be included for purposes of the 3% growth obligation that is a condition for funding for local and tribal governments; Establishing a process for rural resort communities to petition the division of housing to use alternative percentages of area median income for eligibility for certain affordable housing programs for a given funding cycle; Exempting money that was originally from the federal coronavirus state fiscal recovery fund from the appropriations for fiscal year 2022-23 used to determine the state's maintenance of effort requirement for other affordable housing funding; and Requiring the office and the division of housing to provide 3 annual reports to legislative committees about the affordable housing programs. APPROVED by Governor June 5, 2023 EFFECTIVE June 5, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2023-06-05: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act modifies the affordable housing programs (programs) created by Proposition 123, which was approved by voters at the 2022 statewide election, by: Allowing tribal governments to participate in the programs; Requiring the division of local government, rather than the division of housing, to administer the land planning capacity development program; Allowing the office of economic development (office) to use a portion of the money in the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund) for its administrative expenses, without increasing the total amount of money from the fund that may be used for administrative expenses; Modifying the calculation for determining eligibility for some of the programs; Clarifying the description of how money is transferred or allocated; Specifying certain units to be included for purposes of the 3% growth obligation that is a condition for funding for local and tribal governments; Establishing a process for rural resort communities to petition the division of housing to use alternative percentages of area median income for eligibility for certain affordable housing programs for a given funding cycle; Exempting money that was originally from the federal coronavirus state fiscal recovery fund from the appropriations for fiscal year 2022-23 used to determine the state's maintenance of effort requirement for other affordable housing funding; and Requiring the office and the division of housing to provide 3 annual reports to legislative committees about the affordable housing programs. APPROVED by Governor June 5, 2023 EFFECTIVE June 5, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Kyle Brown

Colorado House of Representatives, District 12 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kyle Brown
Colorado Legislature · HB26-1360

Affordable Housing Financing Fund

May 28, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Kyle Brown · Sponsored / Rep. Rick Taggart · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored / Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB26-1360: Affordable Housing Financing Fund. Official enacted-bill summary: The act directs the state treasurer to transfer $130 million from the state affordable housing fund (fund) to the general fund on June 30, 2026, and makes 3 corresponding adjustments to the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund). First, the act reduces the July 1, 2026, transfer from the fund to the financing fund by the amount of the June 30, 2026, transfer from the state affordable housing fund. Second, for the 2026-27 state fiscal year only, the act adjusts the prioritization of programs funded by the financing fund so that the programs are funded in the following order: The concessionary debt program, the affordable housing equity program, and the land banking program. Third, the act ensures that this transfer does not reduce the amount that may be spent on administrative expenses to implement programs funded by the financing fund in the 2026-27 state fiscal year and pools the costs of administering these programs between the administrator and the office of economic development for state fiscal years beginning with the 2026-27 state fiscal year. Under current law, if legislative council staff's March economic and revenue forecast projects that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit, the general assembly may reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund. The act allows for the general assembly to so reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund for the 2025-26 state fiscal year as a result of revenue forecasts projecting that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2026-05-28: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act directs the state treasurer to transfer $130 million from the state affordable housing fund (fund) to the general fund on June 30, 2026, and makes 3 corresponding adjustments to the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund). First, the act reduces the July 1, 2026, transfer from the fund to the financing fund by the amount of the June 30, 2026, transfer from the state affordable housing fund. Second, for the 2026-27 state fiscal year only, the act adjusts the prioritization of programs funded by the financing fund so that the programs are funded in the following order: The concessionary debt program, the affordable housing equity program, and the land banking program. Third, the act ensures that this transfer does not reduce the amount that may be spent on administrative expenses to implement programs funded by the financing fund in the 2026-27 state fiscal year and pools the costs of administering these programs between the administrator and the office of economic development for state fiscal years beginning with the 2026-27 state fiscal year. Under current law, if legislative council staff's March economic and revenue forecast projects that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit, the general assembly may reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund. The act allows for the general assembly to so reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund for the 2025-26 state fiscal year as a result of revenue forecasts projecting that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Rick Taggart

Colorado House of Representatives, District 55 · R–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Rick Taggart
Colorado Legislature · HB26-1360

Affordable Housing Financing Fund

May 28, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Kyle Brown · Sponsored / Rep. Rick Taggart · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored / Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB26-1360: Affordable Housing Financing Fund. Official enacted-bill summary: The act directs the state treasurer to transfer $130 million from the state affordable housing fund (fund) to the general fund on June 30, 2026, and makes 3 corresponding adjustments to the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund). First, the act reduces the July 1, 2026, transfer from the fund to the financing fund by the amount of the June 30, 2026, transfer from the state affordable housing fund. Second, for the 2026-27 state fiscal year only, the act adjusts the prioritization of programs funded by the financing fund so that the programs are funded in the following order: The concessionary debt program, the affordable housing equity program, and the land banking program. Third, the act ensures that this transfer does not reduce the amount that may be spent on administrative expenses to implement programs funded by the financing fund in the 2026-27 state fiscal year and pools the costs of administering these programs between the administrator and the office of economic development for state fiscal years beginning with the 2026-27 state fiscal year. Under current law, if legislative council staff's March economic and revenue forecast projects that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit, the general assembly may reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund. The act allows for the general assembly to so reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund for the 2025-26 state fiscal year as a result of revenue forecasts projecting that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2026-05-28: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act directs the state treasurer to transfer $130 million from the state affordable housing fund (fund) to the general fund on June 30, 2026, and makes 3 corresponding adjustments to the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund). First, the act reduces the July 1, 2026, transfer from the fund to the financing fund by the amount of the June 30, 2026, transfer from the state affordable housing fund. Second, for the 2026-27 state fiscal year only, the act adjusts the prioritization of programs funded by the financing fund so that the programs are funded in the following order: The concessionary debt program, the affordable housing equity program, and the land banking program. Third, the act ensures that this transfer does not reduce the amount that may be spent on administrative expenses to implement programs funded by the financing fund in the 2026-27 state fiscal year and pools the costs of administering these programs between the administrator and the office of economic development for state fiscal years beginning with the 2026-27 state fiscal year. Under current law, if legislative council staff's March economic and revenue forecast projects that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit, the general assembly may reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund. The act allows for the general assembly to so reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund for the 2025-26 state fiscal year as a result of revenue forecasts projecting that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Steven Woodrow

Colorado House of Representatives, District 2 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Steven Woodrow
Colorado Legislature · HB26-1065

Transit and Housing Investment Zones

May 27, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Julie McCluskie · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Woodrow · Sponsored / Sen. Dylan Roberts · Sponsored / Sen. Tony Exum · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB26-1065: Transit and Housing Investment Zones. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires the Colorado office of economic development, in consultation with the department of local affairs and the department of transportation, to publish a transit and housing investment zone map on or before October 30, 2026. The act creates the Colorado affordable housing in transit and housing investment zones tax credit (tax credit). The tax credit is administered in the same manner as the Colorado affordable housing in transit-oriented communities income tax credit; except that the tax credit is awarded in connection with housing projects in transit and housing zones. The act authorizes the Colorado Housing and Finance Authority to allocate up to $8,333,333 in tax credits each calendar year beginning in the 2027 calendar year through the 2033 calendar year. For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $213,349 to the office of the governor for use by economic development programs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2026-05-27: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act requires the Colorado office of economic development, in consultation with the department of local affairs and the department of transportation, to publish a transit and housing investment zone map on or before October 30, 2026. The act creates the Colorado affordable housing in transit and housing investment zones tax credit (tax credit). The tax credit is administered in the same manner as the Colorado affordable housing in transit-oriented communities income tax credit; except that the tax credit is awarded in connection with housing projects in transit and housing zones. The act authorizes the Colorado Housing and Finance Authority to allocate up to $8,333,333 in tax credits each calendar year beginning in the 2027 calendar year through the 2033 calendar year. For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $213,349 to the office of the governor for use by economic development programs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer

Colorado Senate, District 23 · R–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer
Colorado Legislature · HB26-1360

Affordable Housing Financing Fund

May 28, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Kyle Brown · Sponsored / Rep. Rick Taggart · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored / Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB26-1360: Affordable Housing Financing Fund. Official enacted-bill summary: The act directs the state treasurer to transfer $130 million from the state affordable housing fund (fund) to the general fund on June 30, 2026, and makes 3 corresponding adjustments to the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund). First, the act reduces the July 1, 2026, transfer from the fund to the financing fund by the amount of the June 30, 2026, transfer from the state affordable housing fund. Second, for the 2026-27 state fiscal year only, the act adjusts the prioritization of programs funded by the financing fund so that the programs are funded in the following order: The concessionary debt program, the affordable housing equity program, and the land banking program. Third, the act ensures that this transfer does not reduce the amount that may be spent on administrative expenses to implement programs funded by the financing fund in the 2026-27 state fiscal year and pools the costs of administering these programs between the administrator and the office of economic development for state fiscal years beginning with the 2026-27 state fiscal year. Under current law, if legislative council staff's March economic and revenue forecast projects that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit, the general assembly may reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund. The act allows for the general assembly to so reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund for the 2025-26 state fiscal year as a result of revenue forecasts projecting that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2026-05-28: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act directs the state treasurer to transfer $130 million from the state affordable housing fund (fund) to the general fund on June 30, 2026, and makes 3 corresponding adjustments to the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund). First, the act reduces the July 1, 2026, transfer from the fund to the financing fund by the amount of the June 30, 2026, transfer from the state affordable housing fund. Second, for the 2026-27 state fiscal year only, the act adjusts the prioritization of programs funded by the financing fund so that the programs are funded in the following order: The concessionary debt program, the affordable housing equity program, and the land banking program. Third, the act ensures that this transfer does not reduce the amount that may be spent on administrative expenses to implement programs funded by the financing fund in the 2026-27 state fiscal year and pools the costs of administering these programs between the administrator and the office of economic development for state fiscal years beginning with the 2026-27 state fiscal year. Under current law, if legislative council staff's March economic and revenue forecast projects that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit, the general assembly may reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund. The act allows for the general assembly to so reduce the funding allocated to the financing fund for the 2025-26 state fiscal year as a result of revenue forecasts projecting that state revenue will not exceed the state fiscal year spending limit. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Dylan Roberts

Colorado Senate, District 8 · D–CO

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Dylan Roberts
Colorado Legislature · HB26-1065

Transit and Housing Investment Zones

May 27, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Julie McCluskie · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Woodrow · Sponsored / Sen. Dylan Roberts · Sponsored / Sen. Tony Exum · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB26-1065: Transit and Housing Investment Zones. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires the Colorado office of economic development, in consultation with the department of local affairs and the department of transportation, to publish a transit and housing investment zone map on or before October 30, 2026. The act creates the Colorado affordable housing in transit and housing investment zones tax credit (tax credit). The tax credit is administered in the same manner as the Colorado affordable housing in transit-oriented communities income tax credit; except that the tax credit is awarded in connection with housing projects in transit and housing zones. The act authorizes the Colorado Housing and Finance Authority to allocate up to $8,333,333 in tax credits each calendar year beginning in the 2027 calendar year through the 2033 calendar year. For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $213,349 to the office of the governor for use by economic development programs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2026-05-27: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act requires the Colorado office of economic development, in consultation with the department of local affairs and the department of transportation, to publish a transit and housing investment zone map on or before October 30, 2026. The act creates the Colorado affordable housing in transit and housing investment zones tax credit (tax credit). The tax credit is administered in the same manner as the Colorado affordable housing in transit-oriented communities income tax credit; except that the tax credit is awarded in connection with housing projects in transit and housing zones. The act authorizes the Colorado Housing and Finance Authority to allocate up to $8,333,333 in tax credits each calendar year beginning in the 2027 calendar year through the 2033 calendar year. For the 2026-27 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $213,349 to the office of the governor for use by economic development programs. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Colorado Legislature · HB23-1304

Proposition 123 Affordable Housing Programs

Jun 5, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Julie McCluskie · Sponsored / Sen. Lisa Frizell · Sponsored / Sen. Dylan Roberts · Sponsored / Sen. Tony Exum · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB23-1304: Proposition 123 Affordable Housing Programs. Official enacted-bill summary: The act modifies the affordable housing programs (programs) created by Proposition 123, which was approved by voters at the 2022 statewide election, by: Allowing tribal governments to participate in the programs; Requiring the division of local government, rather than the division of housing, to administer the land planning capacity development program; Allowing the office of economic development (office) to use a portion of the money in the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund) for its administrative expenses, without increasing the total amount of money from the fund that may be used for administrative expenses; Modifying the calculation for determining eligibility for some of the programs; Clarifying the description of how money is transferred or allocated; Specifying certain units to be included for purposes of the 3% growth obligation that is a condition for funding for local and tribal governments; Establishing a process for rural resort communities to petition the division of housing to use alternative percentages of area median income for eligibility for certain affordable housing programs for a given funding cycle; Exempting money that was originally from the federal coronavirus state fiscal recovery fund from the appropriations for fiscal year 2022-23 used to determine the state's maintenance of effort requirement for other affordable housing funding; and Requiring the office and the division of housing to provide 3 annual reports to legislative committees about the affordable housing programs. APPROVED by Governor June 5, 2023 EFFECTIVE June 5, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2023-06-05: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act modifies the affordable housing programs (programs) created by Proposition 123, which was approved by voters at the 2022 statewide election, by: Allowing tribal governments to participate in the programs; Requiring the division of local government, rather than the division of housing, to administer the land planning capacity development program; Allowing the office of economic development (office) to use a portion of the money in the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund) for its administrative expenses, without increasing the total amount of money from the fund that may be used for administrative expenses; Modifying the calculation for determining eligibility for some of the programs; Clarifying the description of how money is transferred or allocated; Specifying certain units to be included for purposes of the 3% growth obligation that is a condition for funding for local and tribal governments; Establishing a process for rural resort communities to petition the division of housing to use alternative percentages of area median income for eligibility for certain affordable housing programs for a given funding cycle; Exempting money that was originally from the federal coronavirus state fiscal recovery fund from the appropriations for fiscal year 2022-23 used to determine the state's maintenance of effort requirement for other affordable housing funding; and Requiring the office and the division of housing to provide 3 annual reports to legislative committees about the affordable housing programs. APPROVED by Governor June 5, 2023 EFFECTIVE June 5, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Colorado officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Colorado statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.