Colorado · individual fact

Colorado budget, debt, and interest

Colorado state-government finances, comparable debt and interest figures, and the enacted budget.

The national companion measures federal finances. Here the unit is Colorado state government. Federal debt is not allocated to Colorado; a state budget is not the federal budget.

State debt outstanding$23.57BFY2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Interest expenditure$1.13BFY2024 · #12 of 50 · highest first
Total state tax collections$19.19BFY2024 · #22 of 50 · highest first

Colorado over time

Explore Colorado readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Colorado officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Colorado effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Colorado change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

No comparable time series is retained for this topic. The chart shows events and reviewed actions; current state comparisons appear below.

Colorado government actions Colorado · source units

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Events and reviewed actionsNo saved observations in this range.Sep 1, 2005Jun 30, 2026
✦ Major events & context · 53National context · Hurricane Katrina emergency appropriations · 2005-09-08Katrina relief fundingNational context · Medicare prescription drug benefit begins · 2006-01-01Medicare Part D beginsNational context · Iraq and Afghanistan war funding assessment · 2007-07-31War funding assessmentNational context · Economic Stimulus Act tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 tax rebatesNational context · Treasury support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac · 2008-09-07Fannie / Freddie supportNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Emergency stabilization law creates TARP · 2008-10-03TARP stabilizationNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Affordable Care Act changes health financing · 2010-03-23Health-care financing lawNational context · Tax extensions and payroll-tax relief · 2010-12-172010 tax / benefit dealNational context · Budget Control Act and debt-limit agreement · 2011-08-022011 budget agreementNational context · S&P lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2011-08-05S&P rating downgradeNational context · Fiscal-cliff tax agreement · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff agreementNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · Shutdown ends and debt limit is suspended · 2013-10-172013 funding / debt dealNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 · 2013-12-262013 budget caps dealNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 · 2015-11-022015 budget / debt dealNational context · Fed begins lifting rates after the crisis · 2015-12-16Fed rate normalizationNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 · 2018-02-092018 budget / debt dealNational context · 2018–19 partial government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 funding lapseNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 · 2019-08-022019 budget / debt dealNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and Treasury purchases · 2020-03-15Fed pandemic responseNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · Further pandemic relief and annual funding · 2020-12-27December pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure fundingNational context · Congress raises the debt limit after two impasses · 2021-12-162021 debt-limit increaseNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor funding and investment credits · 2022-08-09CHIPS fundingNational context · PACT Act expands veterans’ benefits · 2022-08-10Veterans’ benefits expansionNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes taxes and spending · 2022-08-16Energy / health / tax lawNational context · Student-loan cancellation cost recorded · 2022-09-30Loan-cost accountingNational context · Inflation and rates raise interest costs above forecasts · 2023-01-09Inflation / interest costsNational context · Fed reports suspension of Treasury payments · 2023-01-13Fed payments suspendedNational context · Disaster tax deadlines move into the next fiscal year · 2023-02-24Disaster tax deferralsNational context · Fiscal Responsibility Act · 2023-06-032023 debt-limit agreementNational context · Fitch lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2023-08-01Fitch rating downgradeNational context · Student-loan cost reversal lowers recorded outlays · 2023-08-31Loan-cost reversalNational context · National security supplemental funding · 2024-04-24Security supplementalNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act becomes law · 2025-01-05Social Security benefitsNational context · Treasury begins extraordinary measures · 2025-01-21Debt-limit measuresNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02Tariffs / customs receiptsNational context · Moody’s lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2025-05-16Moody’s rating downgradeColorado · Colorado approves Proposition 130 implementation · 2025-06-02Colorado law-enforcement fundingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 federal government shutdown · 2025-10-012025 funding lapseNational context · Supreme Court rejects IEEPA tariff authority · 2026-02-20Tariff authority rulingColorado · Colorado directs a housing-fund transfer to the general fund · 2026-05-28Colorado housing-fund transferColorado · Colorado approves its 2026–27 School Finance Act · 2026-05-28Colorado school finance● Colorado Legislature · 162● U.S. Congress · Colorado delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 272222■ Colorado agencies · 22005-09-012026-06-30

45 of 45 reviewed Colorado actions match · 40 date markers shown. 53 major events shown separately.

How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Colorado · state comparison

State debt and interest

Compare state-government balances and interest expenditure from the same Census fiscal-year survey.

Colorado · FY2024$23.57B
Colorado rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.1TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

State debt outstanding

Long-term debt outstanding plus short-term debt outstanding at fiscal year end.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Excludes local-government debt. Dollar ranks describe scale, not credit quality.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · $728.59MHigher value · $166.39BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · $23.57BFY2024 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
State debt outstanding · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$166.39B—
#2New York$120.59B—
#3Texas$70.05B—
#4Massachusetts$65.87B—
#5New Jersey$57.23B—
#6Pennsylvania$48.67B—
#7Illinois$43.38B—
#8Virginia$33.73B—
#9Connecticut$33.27B—
#10Ohio$32.29B—
#11Washington$30.62B—
#12Maryland$25.9B—
#13Michigan$25.02B—
#14Colorado · your comparison$23.57B—
#15Wisconsin$22.79B—
#16Florida$20.14B—
#17Minnesota$17.03B—
#18Oregon$16.91B—
#19Louisiana$16.09B—
#20South Carolina$15.36B—
#21West Virginia$15.08B—
#22Georgia$14.05B—
#23North Carolina$13.13B—
#24Hawaii$11.72B—
#25Rhode Island$11.41B—
#26Alabama$10.99B—
#27Oklahoma$10.15B—
#28Kentucky$10.08B—
#29Tennessee$9.03B—
#30Indiana$8.52B—
#31Iowa$8.06B—
#32Arkansas$8.05B—
#33Mississippi$7.72B—
#34New Hampshire$7.58B—
#35Kansas$7.16B—
#36New Mexico$7.12B—
#37Missouri$6.99B—
#38Arizona$6.88B—
#39Alaska$5.72B—
#40Utah$5.55B—
#41Maine$5.3B—
#42North Dakota$4.89B—
#43South Dakota$4.67B—
#44Delaware$3.69B—
#45Nebraska$3.39B—
#46Nevada$2.89B—
#47Montana$2.76B—
#48Vermont$2.67B—
#49Wyoming$1.26B—
#50Idaho$728.59M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Colorado · state comparison

Where state revenue comes from

All measures use Census state-government records for FY2024. Categories describe collections; they do not rank statutory tax rates.

Colorado · FY2024$4.67B
Colorado rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$465.4BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

General sales-tax collections

Census category T09.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $54.35BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · $4.67BFY2024 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
General sales-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas$54.35B—
#2California$53.33B—
#3Florida$40.09B—
#4Washington$22.81B—
#5New York$19.99B—
#6Ohio$16.33B—
#7Illinois$16.05B—
#8Pennsylvania$15.6B—
#9New Jersey$14.31B—
#10Tennessee$14.08B—
#11Arizona$13.16B—
#12Michigan$12.7B—
#13North Carolina$12.16B—
#14Indiana$10.96B—
#15Massachusetts$9.4B—
#16Georgia$9.01B—
#17Minnesota$8.49B—
#18Nevada$8.4B—
#19Wisconsin$7.59B—
#20Virginia$7.4B—
#21Maryland$6.85B—
#22South Carolina$6.44B—
#23Connecticut$6.23B—
#24Kentucky$5.8B—
#25Missouri$5.26B—
#26Mississippi$5.07B—
#27Arkansas$5.07B—
#28Louisiana$4.87B—
#29Hawaii$4.79B—
#30Colorado · your comparison$4.67B—
#31Iowa$4.64B—
#32Utah$4.63B—
#33Alabama$4.59B—
#34Kansas$4.33B—
#35New Mexico$4.33B—
#36Oklahoma$3.81B—
#37Idaho$3.09B—
#38Nebraska$2.97B—
#39Maine$2.35B—
#40West Virginia$1.82B—
#41South Dakota$1.68B—
#42Rhode Island$1.63B—
#43Oregon$1.34B—
#44North Dakota$1.32B—
#45Wyoming$1.01B—
#46Vermont$597.33M—
#47Alaska$0—
#47Delaware$0—
#47Montana$0—
#47New Hampshire$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Colorado · state comparison

Where state operating spending goes

Census categories allow consistent comparisons. These selected categories are not a breakdown of the current Colorado appropriations act.

Colorado · FY2024$13.6B
Colorado rank#26among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.02TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public welfare current operations

Current operations for public welfare institutions and other public welfare, excluding capital and transfers.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · $1.09BHigher value · $156.71BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · $13.6BFY2024 · Rank #26 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Public welfare current operations · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$156.71B—
#2New York$97.35B—
#3Texas$57.32B—
#4Illinois$41.13B—
#5Florida$40.11B—
#6Ohio$39.77B—
#7Pennsylvania$39.34B—
#8Massachusetts$34.12B—
#9North Carolina$30.64B—
#10New Jersey$28.06B—
#11Arizona$26.02B—
#12Michigan$24.37B—
#13Virginia$23.68B—
#14Minnesota$23.37B—
#15Indiana$22.93B—
#16Maryland$21.61B—
#17Kentucky$20.54B—
#18Oregon$20.47B—
#19Washington$19.6B—
#20Georgia$18.99B—
#21Louisiana$18.69B—
#22Tennessee$16.42B—
#23Wisconsin$16.26B—
#24Missouri$15.65B—
#25Oklahoma$14.57B—
#26Colorado · your comparison$13.6B—
#27South Carolina$12.84B—
#28New Mexico$10.72B—
#29Iowa$10.26B—
#30Alabama$9.73B—
#31Arkansas$8.67B—
#32Mississippi$8.08B—
#33Utah$6.91B—
#34Kansas$6.84B—
#35Nevada$6.62B—
#36West Virginia$6.24B—
#37Maine$5.7B—
#38Nebraska$4.97B—
#39Connecticut$4.88B—
#40Rhode Island$4.54B—
#41Hawaii$4.14B—
#42Delaware$3.97B—
#43Idaho$3.73B—
#44Alaska$3.27B—
#45Montana$2.89B—
#46New Hampshire$2.72B—
#47Vermont$2.69B—
#48North Dakota$2.09B—
#49South Dakota$1.95B—
#50Wyoming$1.09B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Colorado · state comparison

State operating costs and the enacted budget

The enacted plan, spending categories and audited activity use different periods and accounting scopes; they are kept separate.

Colorado · FY2024$32.73B
Colorado rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$2.04TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current operation expenditure

Sum of Census current-operation expenditure categories, excluding capital outlay, interest, and assistance/subsidy expenditure.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. This FY2024 comparison differs in scope and period from Colorado’s FY2026–27 appropriations and Fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 audit shown below.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Colorado stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Colorado has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.01BHigher value · $287.03BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Colorado · $32.73BFY2024 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Colorado with every state · 50 ranked
Current operation expenditure · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$287.03B—
#2New York$161.37B—
#3Texas$136.18B—
#4Florida$86.61B—
#5Pennsylvania$77.15B—
#6Illinois$75.67B—
#7Ohio$66.77B—
#8New Jersey$64.53B—
#9Massachusetts$61.38B—
#10North Carolina$59.01B—
#11Michigan$57.27B—
#12Virginia$53.45B—
#13Washington$49.82B—
#14Georgia$45.19B—
#15Maryland$45.06B—
#16Oregon$41.41B—
#17Arizona$38.71B—
#18Minnesota$38.1B—
#19Indiana$37.4B—
#20Kentucky$36.94B—
#21Wisconsin$34.5B—
#22Missouri$34.43B—
#23South Carolina$32.85B—
#24Colorado · your comparison$32.73B—
#25Louisiana$31.67B—
#26Tennessee$31.12B—
#27Alabama$26.99B—
#28Oklahoma$24.28B—
#29Utah$22.7B—
#30New Mexico$21.94B—
#31Connecticut$21.22B—
#32Iowa$19.89B—
#33Kansas$18.39B—
#34Hawaii$16.62B—
#35Mississippi$16.46B—
#36Arkansas$16.28B—
#37West Virginia$13.19B—
#38Nevada$12.43B—
#39Nebraska$10.41B—
#40Maine$10.12B—
#41Delaware$9.24B—
#42Rhode Island$8.93B—
#43Alaska$8.4B—
#44Idaho$8.21B—
#45New Hampshire$7.12B—
#46Montana$6.44B—
#47Vermont$6.28B—
#48North Dakota$5.63B—
#49South Dakota$4.55B—
#50Wyoming$4.01B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

FY2026–27 · Signed May 8, 2026

Enacted appropriations

$49.7B

The Joint Budget Committee staff's final operating appropriations across every department and all four fund columns after the 2026 regular session. The amount is appropriation authority and excludes capital-construction appropriations and other non-operating obligations discussed separately in the report.

Where State tax revenue comes from

FY2025 ACFR actual

Shares of the $19.523 billion in taxes reported as general revenue for Colorado's primary government. The calculation combines unrestricted taxes with taxes restricted for education and transportation; locally retained property and sales taxes are outside this State-level denominator.

Individual income tax
$10.0B · 51.2%
Sales and use taxes
$4.9B · 25.3%
Corporate and fiduciary income tax
$2.6B · 13.4%
Other taxes and TABOR adjustment
$810.4M · 4.2%
Transportation taxes
$644.7M · 3.3%
Excise taxes
$497.7M · 2.5%

FY2026–27 operating appropriations

FY2026–27 operating budget

FactVote grouped the final department totals by service area. Each department is assigned once, and the residual category preserves every remaining department so the figures reconcile exactly to $49.694 billion.

Health and human services
$24.9B · 50.2%
Education
$14.4B · 29%
Public safety and justice
$3.5B · 7%
Transportation
$2.3B · 4.6%
Other State services
$4.6B · 9.3%

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt from FactVote’s Colorado candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

19 statements from 12 candidates

2026 Colorado Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Michael J. Allen

1 statement

Republican · Attorney General · CO

Budgets, spending & debt

Colorado families are being squeezed from every direction. The cost of housing, groceries, insurance, utilities, and other necessities continue to rise, while government makes taxpayers pay more so government spending can continue to rise. Michael believes government has a responsibility to live wit…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Saving Taxpayer Dollars

Candidate campaign source

Colorado families are being squeezed from every direction. The cost of housing, groceries, insurance, utilities, and other necessities continue to rise, while government makes taxpayers pay more so government spending can continue to rise. Michael believes government has a responsibility to live within its means and deliver real results for the people who pay the bills.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Michael J. Allen campaign source ↗

2026 Colorado Governor / Lt. Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Greg Lopez

1 statement

Unaffiliated · Governor / Lt. Governor · CO

Budgets, spending & debt

As Governor, I will use zero-based budgeting which will allow discussion to occur on every taxpayer dollar identified in the state budget.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: DOGE / Government Efficiency

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, I will use zero-based budgeting which will allow discussion to occur on every taxpayer dollar identified in the state budget.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Greg Lopez — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Jeff Peckman

1 statement

Unity · Governor / Lt. Governor · CO

Budgets, spending & debt

It's vital that Colorado begins to more fully employ a category of underutilized "coherence" technologies. These will improve the quality of life for Coloradoans in ways not achievable otherwise. That will result from "Bringing the Light of Unifying Solutions into the Darkness of Divisive Two-Party …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Vision of a Coherent Colorado

Candidate campaign source

It's vital that Colorado begins to more fully employ a category of underutilized "coherence" technologies. These will improve the quality of life for Coloradoans in ways not achievable otherwise. That will result from "Bringing the Light of Unifying Solutions into the Darkness of Divisive Two-Party Politics". Moreover, they will enable Colorado to launch and lead new economic engines that will generate tens of billions of dollars in impact, while reducing costly problems and unsustainable government budgets. That's what real solutions can achieve!

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jeff Peckman — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Victor Marx

5 statements

Republican · Governor / Lt. Governor · CO

Budgets, spending & debt

Under my administration, each department will be required to establish measurable annual performance goals—covering statutory duties, fiscal stewardship, customer service standards, and efficiency benchmarks—pursuant to the SMART Government Act (C.R.S. § 2-7-103). Departments will publish mid-year a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government Accountability & Transparency

Candidate campaign source

Under my administration, each department will be required to establish measurable annual performance goals—covering statutory duties, fiscal stewardship, customer service standards, and efficiency benchmarks—pursuant to the SMART Government Act (C.R.S. § 2-7-103). Departments will publish mid-year and year-end progress reports, which will appear on the public transparency dashboard. This policy reinforces the constitutional standard that public officials remain accountable to the people (Colo. Const. art. II, § 1) and ensures departments demonstrate quantifiable results for taxpayer-funded programs. Non-compliant agencies will be subject to legislative hearings and budgetary review by the Joint Budget Committee.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 4 more statements from Victor Marx
Budgets, spending & debt

As Governor, I will aggressively defend Colorado’s water rights under the Colorado River Compact and the Prior Appropriation Doctrine. My administration will direct the Colorado Water Conservation Board, under C.R.S. § 37-60-101, to strengthen interstate negotiation positions, enhance water-availabi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, technology, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, I will aggressively defend Colorado’s water rights under the Colorado River Compact and the Prior Appropriation Doctrine. My administration will direct the Colorado Water Conservation Board, under C.R.S. § 37-60-101, to strengthen interstate negotiation positions, enhance water-availability modeling, and oppose any federal action that jeopardizes Colorado’s allocations or attempts to federalize state-controlled water.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Budgets, spending & debt

As Governor, I will require the Department of Public Safety to conduct statewide staffing and training assessments under C.R.S. § 24-33.5-401 et seq. to identify shortages in patrol coverage, investigative capacity, and officer safety resources. My administration will direct targeted funding—through…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, I will require the Department of Public Safety to conduct statewide staffing and training assessments under C.R.S. § 24-33.5-401 et seq. to identify shortages in patrol coverage, investigative capacity, and officer safety resources. My administration will direct targeted funding—through reallocation of existing appropriations and Byrne JAG grant matches (34 U.S.C. § 10151)—to ensure that every community has adequately staffed and properly equipped peace officers. This policy fulfills my constitutional duty under Colo. Const. art. IV, § 2 to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” and ensures law enforcement agencies possess the resources necessary to respond to violent crime, property offenses, and emerging threats. My administration will publish annual staffing benchmarks and training-compliance reports for every jurisdiction to ensure transparency and accountability.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Budgets, spending & debt

My administration will expand regional mental-health stabilization centers and secure detox facilities under C.R.S. § 27-60-104, ensuring that each judicial district has access to 24-hour crisis response, involuntary-hold capacity, and direct law-enforcement drop-off centers. Funding will utilize re…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Law & Order / Public Safety

Candidate campaign source

My administration will expand regional mental-health stabilization centers and secure detox facilities under C.R.S. § 27-60-104, ensuring that each judicial district has access to 24-hour crisis response, involuntary-hold capacity, and direct law-enforcement drop-off centers. Funding will utilize reallocated behavioral-health appropriations and SAMHSA block grants under 42 U.S.C. § 300x-21.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Budgets, spending & debt

As Governor, I will take action to ensure full performance, financial, and statutory-compliance audits of every executive agency are promptly conducted upon taking office. This will include an evaluation of spending practices, regulatory overlap, contract inefficiencies, and whether agencies are mee…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, I will take action to ensure full performance, financial, and statutory-compliance audits of every executive agency are promptly conducted upon taking office. This will include an evaluation of spending practices, regulatory overlap, contract inefficiencies, and whether agencies are meeting their legal obligations. All agencies will be required to provide data and internal records pursuant to C.R.S. § 24-72-203 to ensure full transparency during the audit. This initiative fulfills my constitutional responsibility under Colo. Const. art. IV, § 2 to ensure the laws are faithfully executed, and it restores public confidence by requiring measurable corrections where deficiencies are found. Under my administration, audit findings will be made publicly available, and agencies that fail to implement required reforms will face budgetary consequences under C.R.S. § 24-37-201.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Victor Marx — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Colorado U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Joe Neguse

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · CO

Budgets, spending & debt

Every student should be able to obtain a quality public-school education. To support Colorado’s rural and mountain communities, Joe introduced and enacted legislation to support rural schools through funds for supplies, building improvements and more. To support college students, Joe is sponsoring m…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Every student should be able to obtain a quality public-school education. To support Colorado’s rural and mountain communities, Joe introduced and enacted legislation to support rural schools through funds for supplies, building improvements and more. To support college students, Joe is sponsoring measures to expand the use of free, open-access textbooks and make the transfer process easier for students at community college. Joe has also sponsored measures to ensure that every public higher education graduate finishes debt-free, and to protect the internet as a vital tool for innovation and economic growth by reinstituting net neutrality and preserving internet freedom. Joe also continues to fight for increasing teacher pay, federal Title I funding for low-income students, and federal Title II funding for teacher training, and during the House appropriations process, he successfully worked with his colleagues to secure millions of dollars in increased funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to ensure every student is set up to succeed, regardless of their background or abilities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joe Neguse — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · CO

Budgets, spending & debt

Restore Fiscal Responsibility

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Legislative Goals

Candidate campaign source

Restore Fiscal Responsibility

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Kelley Anne Dennison campaign source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Kelley Anne Dennison
Budgets, spending & debt

Restore Fiscal ResponsibilityFight to reduce reckless federal spending that fuels inflation and drives up the cost of living for working Americans. Congress must return to responsible budgeting and stop passing trillion-dollar spending packages that burden future generations.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: EconomicAffordability.

Candidate campaign source

Restore Fiscal ResponsibilityFight to reduce reckless federal spending that fuels inflation and drives up the cost of living for working Americans. Congress must return to responsible budgeting and stop passing trillion-dollar spending packages that burden future generations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Kelley Anne Dennison campaign source 3 ↗
Budgets, spending & debt

Fight to reduce reckless federal spending that fuels inflation and drives up the cost of living for working Americans. Congress must return to responsible budgeting and stop passing trillion-dollar spending packages that burden future generations.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: EconomicAffordability.

Candidate campaign source

Fight to reduce reckless federal spending that fuels inflation and drives up the cost of living for working Americans. Congress must return to responsible budgeting and stop passing trillion-dollar spending packages that burden future generations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Kelley Anne Dennison campaign source 3 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt terms in retained, attributed source text from published Colorado candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Colorado incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Colorado legislators and Colorado’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Colorado’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

35 matching sponsorships or proposals · 22 Colorado incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Andrew Boesenecker

Colorado House of Representatives, District 53 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Andrew Boesenecker
Colorado Legislature · HB24-1353

Firearms Dealer Requirements & Permit

Jun 7, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Emily Sirota · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB24-1353: Firearms Dealer Requirements & Permit. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires a firearms dealer (dealer), beginning July 1, 2025, to obtain a state firearms dealer permit (state permit) in order to engage in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices in Colorado. Engaging in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices without a permit is an unclassified felony, punishable by a fine of up to $250,000. In order to be issued a state permit, the dealer must hold a federal firearms license; not have had a federal, state, or local license to deal firearms or ammunition revoked, suspended, or denied within the prior 3 years; and not have violated any state or federal law concerning the possession, purchase, or sale of firearms in the 3 years before applying for the state permit. The department of revenue (department) is responsible for issuing state permits. The fee for issuing a permit is $400, which may be adjusted annually by the department. A state permit is valid for 3 years. The department, subject to available appropriations, is required to conduct an on-site inspection of a random selection of 10% of state permit holders each year and, additionally, may conduct periodic unannounced dealer inspections. The department shall revoke a dealer's state permit if the dealer: No longer holds a valid federal firearms license; Does not permit a required inspection of the dealer's business or a required record; or Is convicted of obtaining a firearm for or transferring a firearm to a person who is ineligible to possess a firearm, transferring a firearm prior to receiving the results of a background check, trafficking in firearms, or unlawfully selling or transferring a firearm component or accessory. If the department finds that a dealer failed to post a required notice, make a report about unlawful purchase, or make a required record; transferred a firearm without a locking device; or violated other federal, state, or local laws concerning the sale of firearms or firearm components, the department shall: For a first offense, issue a warning; and For a second offense, issue a warning, suspend the dealer's permit, or revoke the dealer's state permit.

2024-06-07: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act requires a firearms dealer (dealer), beginning July 1, 2025, to obtain a state firearms dealer permit (state permit) in order to engage in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices in Colorado. Engaging in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices without a permit is an unclassified felony, punishable by a fine of up to $250,000. In order to be issued a state permit, the dealer must hold a federal firearms license; not have had a federal, state, or local license to deal firearms or ammunition revoked, suspended, or denied within the prior 3 years; and not have violated any state or federal law concerning the possession, purchase, or sale of firearms in the 3 years before applying for the state permit. The department of revenue (department) is responsible for issuing state permits. The fee for issuing a permit is $400, which may be adjusted annually by the department. A state permit is valid for 3 years. The department, subject to available appropriations, is required to conduct an on-site inspection of a random selection of 10% of state permit holders each year and, additionally, may conduct periodic unannounced dealer inspections. The department shall revoke a dealer's state permit if the dealer: No longer holds a valid federal firearms license; Does not permit a required inspection of the dealer's business or a required record; or Is convicted of obtaining a firearm for or transferring a firearm to a person who is ineligible to possess a firearm, transferring a firearm prior to receiving the results of a background check, trafficking in firearms, or unlawfully selling or transferring a firearm component or accessory. If the department finds that a dealer failed to post a required notice, make a report about unlawful purchase, or make a required record; transferred a firearm without a locking device; or violated other federal, state, or local laws concerning the sale of firearms or firearm components, the department shall: For a first offense, issue a warning; and For a second offense, issue a warning, suspend the dealer's permit, or revoke the dealer's state permit.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brittany Pettersen

U.S. House of Representatives, Colorado District 7 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brittany Pettersen
Colorado Legislature · HB19-1177

Extreme Risk Protection Orders

Apr 12, 2019 · Enacted

Sen. Tom Sullivan · Sponsored / Rep. Brittany Pettersen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB19-1177: Extreme Risk Protection Orders. Official enacted-bill summary: Firearms - extreme risk protection order - petition requirements - hearings - firearm surrender options - termination hearing - appropriation. The act creates the ability for a family or household member or a law enforcement officer to petition the court for a temporary extreme risk protection order (ERPO) beginning on January 1, 2020. The petitioner must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that a person poses a significant risk to self or others by having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm. The petitioner must submit an affidavit signed under oath and penalty of perjury that sets forth facts to support the issuance of a temporary ERPO and a reasonable basis for believing they exist. The court must hold a temporary ERPO hearing in person or by telephone on the day the petition is filed or on the court day immediately following the day the petition is filed. After issuance of a temporary ERPO, the court must schedule a second hearing no later than 14 days following the issuance to determine whether the issuance of a continuing ERPO is warranted. The court shall appoint counsel to represent the respondent at the hearing. If a family or household member or a law enforcement officer establishes by clear and convincing evidence that a person poses a significant risk to self or others by having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm, the court may issue a continuing ERPO. The ERPO prohibits the respondent from possessing, controlling, purchasing, or receiving a firearm for 364 days. Upon issuance of the ERPO, the respondent shall surrender all of his or her firearms and his or her concealed carry permit if the respondent has one. The respondent may surrender his or her firearms either to a law enforcement agency or a federally licensed firearms dealer, or, if the firearm is an antique or relic or curio, the firearm may be surrendered to a family member who is eligible to possess a firearm and who does not reside with the respondent.

2019-04-12: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Firearms - extreme risk protection order - petition requirements - hearings - firearm surrender options - termination hearing - appropriation. The act creates the ability for a family or household member or a law enforcement officer to petition the court for a temporary extreme risk protection order (ERPO) beginning on January 1, 2020. The petitioner must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that a person poses a significant risk to self or others by having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm. The petitioner must submit an affidavit signed under oath and penalty of perjury that sets forth facts to support the issuance of a temporary ERPO and a reasonable basis for believing they exist. The court must hold a temporary ERPO hearing in person or by telephone on the day the petition is filed or on the court day immediately following the day the petition is filed. After issuance of a temporary ERPO, the court must schedule a second hearing no later than 14 days following the issuance to determine whether the issuance of a continuing ERPO is warranted. The court shall appoint counsel to represent the respondent at the hearing. If a family or household member or a law enforcement officer establishes by clear and convincing evidence that a person poses a significant risk to self or others by having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm, the court may issue a continuing ERPO. The ERPO prohibits the respondent from possessing, controlling, purchasing, or receiving a firearm for 364 days. Upon issuance of the ERPO, the respondent shall surrender all of his or her firearms and his or her concealed carry permit if the respondent has one. The respondent may surrender his or her firearms either to a law enforcement agency or a federally licensed firearms dealer, or, if the firearm is an antique or relic or curio, the firearm may be surrendered to a family member who is eligible to possess a firearm and who does not reside with the respondent.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Emily Sirota

Colorado House of Representatives, District 9 · D–CO

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Emily Sirota
Colorado Legislature · HB24-1353

Firearms Dealer Requirements & Permit

Jun 7, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Emily Sirota · Sponsored / Rep. Andrew Boesenecker · Sponsored / Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB24-1353: Firearms Dealer Requirements & Permit. Official enacted-bill summary: The act requires a firearms dealer (dealer), beginning July 1, 2025, to obtain a state firearms dealer permit (state permit) in order to engage in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices in Colorado. Engaging in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices without a permit is an unclassified felony, punishable by a fine of up to $250,000. In order to be issued a state permit, the dealer must hold a federal firearms license; not have had a federal, state, or local license to deal firearms or ammunition revoked, suspended, or denied within the prior 3 years; and not have violated any state or federal law concerning the possession, purchase, or sale of firearms in the 3 years before applying for the state permit. The department of revenue (department) is responsible for issuing state permits. The fee for issuing a permit is $400, which may be adjusted annually by the department. A state permit is valid for 3 years. The department, subject to available appropriations, is required to conduct an on-site inspection of a random selection of 10% of state permit holders each year and, additionally, may conduct periodic unannounced dealer inspections. The department shall revoke a dealer's state permit if the dealer: No longer holds a valid federal firearms license; Does not permit a required inspection of the dealer's business or a required record; or Is convicted of obtaining a firearm for or transferring a firearm to a person who is ineligible to possess a firearm, transferring a firearm prior to receiving the results of a background check, trafficking in firearms, or unlawfully selling or transferring a firearm component or accessory. If the department finds that a dealer failed to post a required notice, make a report about unlawful purchase, or make a required record; transferred a firearm without a locking device; or violated other federal, state, or local laws concerning the sale of firearms or firearm components, the department shall: For a first offense, issue a warning; and For a second offense, issue a warning, suspend the dealer's permit, or revoke the dealer's state permit.

2024-06-07: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act requires a firearms dealer (dealer), beginning July 1, 2025, to obtain a state firearms dealer permit (state permit) in order to engage in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices in Colorado. Engaging in the business of dealing in firearms other than destructive devices without a permit is an unclassified felony, punishable by a fine of up to $250,000. In order to be issued a state permit, the dealer must hold a federal firearms license; not have had a federal, state, or local license to deal firearms or ammunition revoked, suspended, or denied within the prior 3 years; and not have violated any state or federal law concerning the possession, purchase, or sale of firearms in the 3 years before applying for the state permit. The department of revenue (department) is responsible for issuing state permits. The fee for issuing a permit is $400, which may be adjusted annually by the department. A state permit is valid for 3 years. The department, subject to available appropriations, is required to conduct an on-site inspection of a random selection of 10% of state permit holders each year and, additionally, may conduct periodic unannounced dealer inspections. The department shall revoke a dealer's state permit if the dealer: No longer holds a valid federal firearms license; Does not permit a required inspection of the dealer's business or a required record; or Is convicted of obtaining a firearm for or transferring a firearm to a person who is ineligible to possess a firearm, transferring a firearm prior to receiving the results of a background check, trafficking in firearms, or unlawfully selling or transferring a firearm component or accessory. If the department finds that a dealer failed to post a required notice, make a report about unlawful purchase, or make a required record; transferred a firearm without a locking device; or violated other federal, state, or local laws concerning the sale of firearms or firearm components, the department shall: For a first offense, issue a warning; and For a second offense, issue a warning, suspend the dealer's permit, or revoke the dealer's state permit.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Colorado Legislature · SB23-231

Amend Fund To Allow Payment Overdue Wage Claims

Apr 17, 2023 · Enacted

Sen. Jeff Bridges · Sponsored / Rep. Emily Sirota · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of SB23-231: Amend Fund To Allow Payment Overdue Wage Claims. Official enacted-bill summary: Starting April 1, 2024, the act allows the division of labor standards and statistics (division) in the department of labor and employment (department) to use money in the wage theft enforcement fund (fund) to pay employees who are owed money from their employers due to obligations and liabilities related to the payment of wages or other compensation. The division may pay an employee if an employer fails to fulfill an order by the division to pay the employee that results from a wage claim or an investigation: Within 6 months after the division issues a citation and notice of assessment to the employer; or If the employer requests a hearing, within 6 months after the hearing officer issues a decision. The act specifies that after the division pays the employee: The employee cannot recover that payment amount from the employer; The division replaces the employee as creditor and shall continue to pursue the payment from the employer; and Any money recovered from the employer by the division will be credited to the fund. The act requires the division to promulgate rules specifying procedures and criteria for employees to request payments and for the division to make determinations on employee requests. The act continuously appropriates money in the fund to the division for the purpose of making payments to employees for unpaid liabilities, but for purposes of the division's direct and indirect costs implementing wage laws, the money in the fund is subject to annual appropriation by the general assembly. The act excludes the fund from the limit on cash fund reserves. For the 2023-24 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $12,657 from the fund to the department for use by the department's office of the executive director for personal services. APPROVED by Governor April 17, 2023 EFFECTIVE April 17, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2023-04-17: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Starting April 1, 2024, the act allows the division of labor standards and statistics (division) in the department of labor and employment (department) to use money in the wage theft enforcement fund (fund) to pay employees who are owed money from their employers due to obligations and liabilities related to the payment of wages or other compensation. The division may pay an employee if an employer fails to fulfill an order by the division to pay the employee that results from a wage claim or an investigation: Within 6 months after the division issues a citation and notice of assessment to the employer; or If the employer requests a hearing, within 6 months after the hearing officer issues a decision. The act specifies that after the division pays the employee: The employee cannot recover that payment amount from the employer; The division replaces the employee as creditor and shall continue to pursue the payment from the employer; and Any money recovered from the employer by the division will be credited to the fund. The act requires the division to promulgate rules specifying procedures and criteria for employees to request payments and for the division to make determinations on employee requests. The act continuously appropriates money in the fund to the division for the purpose of making payments to employees for unpaid liabilities, but for purposes of the division's direct and indirect costs implementing wage laws, the money in the fund is subject to annual appropriation by the general assembly. The act excludes the fund from the limit on cash fund reserves. For the 2023-24 state fiscal year, the act appropriates $12,657 from the fund to the department for use by the department's office of the executive director for personal services. APPROVED by Governor April 17, 2023 EFFECTIVE April 17, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Javier Mabrey

Colorado House of Representatives, District 1 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Javier Mabrey
Colorado Legislature · SB25-020

Tenant and Landlord Law Enforcement

May 28, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Mike Weissman · Sponsored / Sen. Julie Gonzales · Sponsored / Rep. Mandy Lindsay · Sponsored / Rep. Javier Mabrey · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of SB25-020: Tenant and Landlord Law Enforcement. Official enacted-bill summary: Section 2 clarifies that the attorney general has the power to initiate and bring civil and criminal actions to enforce certain state landlord-tenant laws and that these actions must be initiated and brought within existing appropriations. Sections 4 and 5 grant counties, cities and counties, and municipalities the power to initiate and bring civil actions to enforce certain state landlord-tenant laws. Sections 4 and 5 also create requirements related to a county, city and county, or municipality retaining a private attorney to initiate or bring these civil actions. Section 6 establishes a receivership mechanism that is available as a remedy for violations of applicable laws and regulations by the landlord of multifamily residential property. The attorney general, a county, a city and county, and a municipality may all apply to a district court for the appointment of a receiver to operate a multifamily residential property if there is reasonable cause to believe that the landlord has engaged in a pattern of neglect, as defined in the Act, in connection with the property. The act establishes the process for a district court appointing a receiver, including requiring a hearing and an order of appointment that specifies the duties of a receiver, and the criteria for qualifying as a receiver. No sooner than 90 days after the district court appoints a receiver, the landlord of the relevant property, a lessee of the entire relevant property, the attorney general, or a county, city and county, or municipality may submit an application to the district court to terminate the receivership. As with the appointing of a receiver, section 6 establishes the process by which a district court may terminate a receivership. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2025-05-28: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 2 clarifies that the attorney general has the power to initiate and bring civil and criminal actions to enforce certain state landlord-tenant laws and that these actions must be initiated and brought within existing appropriations. Sections 4 and 5 grant counties, cities and counties, and municipalities the power to initiate and bring civil actions to enforce certain state landlord-tenant laws. Sections 4 and 5 also create requirements related to a county, city and county, or municipality retaining a private attorney to initiate or bring these civil actions. Section 6 establishes a receivership mechanism that is available as a remedy for violations of applicable laws and regulations by the landlord of multifamily residential property. The attorney general, a county, a city and county, and a municipality may all apply to a district court for the appointment of a receiver to operate a multifamily residential property if there is reasonable cause to believe that the landlord has engaged in a pattern of neglect, as defined in the Act, in connection with the property. The act establishes the process for a district court appointing a receiver, including requiring a hearing and an order of appointment that specifies the duties of a receiver, and the criteria for qualifying as a receiver. No sooner than 90 days after the district court appoints a receiver, the landlord of the relevant property, a lessee of the entire relevant property, the attorney general, or a county, city and county, or municipality may submit an application to the district court to terminate the receivership. As with the appointing of a receiver, section 6 establishes the process by which a district court may terminate a receivership. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Julie McCluskie

Colorado House of Representatives, District 13 · D–CO

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Julie McCluskie
Colorado Legislature · HB23-1304

Proposition 123 Affordable Housing Programs

Jun 5, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Julie McCluskie · Sponsored / Sen. Lisa Frizell · Sponsored / Sen. Dylan Roberts · Sponsored / Sen. Tony Exum · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB23-1304: Proposition 123 Affordable Housing Programs. Official enacted-bill summary: The act modifies the affordable housing programs (programs) created by Proposition 123, which was approved by voters at the 2022 statewide election, by: Allowing tribal governments to participate in the programs; Requiring the division of local government, rather than the division of housing, to administer the land planning capacity development program; Allowing the office of economic development (office) to use a portion of the money in the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund) for its administrative expenses, without increasing the total amount of money from the fund that may be used for administrative expenses; Modifying the calculation for determining eligibility for some of the programs; Clarifying the description of how money is transferred or allocated; Specifying certain units to be included for purposes of the 3% growth obligation that is a condition for funding for local and tribal governments; Establishing a process for rural resort communities to petition the division of housing to use alternative percentages of area median income for eligibility for certain affordable housing programs for a given funding cycle; Exempting money that was originally from the federal coronavirus state fiscal recovery fund from the appropriations for fiscal year 2022-23 used to determine the state's maintenance of effort requirement for other affordable housing funding; and Requiring the office and the division of housing to provide 3 annual reports to legislative committees about the affordable housing programs. APPROVED by Governor June 5, 2023 EFFECTIVE June 5, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2023-06-05: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act modifies the affordable housing programs (programs) created by Proposition 123, which was approved by voters at the 2022 statewide election, by: Allowing tribal governments to participate in the programs; Requiring the division of local government, rather than the division of housing, to administer the land planning capacity development program; Allowing the office of economic development (office) to use a portion of the money in the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund) for its administrative expenses, without increasing the total amount of money from the fund that may be used for administrative expenses; Modifying the calculation for determining eligibility for some of the programs; Clarifying the description of how money is transferred or allocated; Specifying certain units to be included for purposes of the 3% growth obligation that is a condition for funding for local and tribal governments; Establishing a process for rural resort communities to petition the division of housing to use alternative percentages of area median income for eligibility for certain affordable housing programs for a given funding cycle; Exempting money that was originally from the federal coronavirus state fiscal recovery fund from the appropriations for fiscal year 2022-23 used to determine the state's maintenance of effort requirement for other affordable housing funding; and Requiring the office and the division of housing to provide 3 annual reports to legislative committees about the affordable housing programs. APPROVED by Governor June 5, 2023 EFFECTIVE June 5, 2023 (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Colorado Legislature · HB22-1289

Health Benefits For Colorado Children And Pregnant Persons

Jun 7, 2022 · Enacted

Rep. Julie McCluskie · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of HB22-1289: Health Benefits For Colorado Children And Pregnant Persons. Official enacted-bill summary: The enacted bill requires outreach and enrollment for expanded coverage and removes certain CHP enrollment fees. It also creates separate state-funded coverage for children and pregnant people otherwise ineligible because of immigration status. That separate program is not automatically part of the Health First Colorado enrollment count. The act makes the following changes to health insurance coverage for low-income pregnant people and children in low-income families: Provides full health insurance coverage for Colorado pregnant people who would be eligible for medicaid and the children's basic health plan (CHIP) if not for their immigration status and continues that coverage for 12 months postpartum at the CHIP federal matching rate; Provides comprehensive health insurance coverage for all Colorado children who would be eligible for medicaid and CHIP if not for their immigration status; Requires the state department of health care policy and financing (department) to create an outreach and enrollment strategy for enrolling eligible groups into new coverage options; Requires the department to report to the joint budget committee in its 2024 presentation, as well as in its "State Measurement for Accountable, Responsive, and Transparent (SMART) Government Act" reports, beginning in January 2026, information concerning the state-funded health and medical care program, the state children's basic health plan, and its plans and progress in implementing the coverage expansion for lawfully residing persons; Allows the state controller to allow the department to make an expenditure in excess of the amount authorized if the amount is for the state medical assistance program or the state children's basic health plan; Provides comprehensive lactation support services, lactation supplies and equipment, and maintenance of multi-use loaned equipment. Removes the annual enrollment fee for a family whose income is at or below one hundred fifty percent of the federal poverty line or an enrollee who is a pregnant person. Draws down federal funds to improve perinatal and postpartum support and requires that priorities for the funds be determined through a stakeholder process; Creates a special enrollment period for health insurance coverage due to pregnancy so that an eligible person can sign up for insurance as soon as the person becomes pregnant; and Improves the quality of health insurance coverage available through the health insurance affordability enterprise.

2022-06-07: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Health First Colorado enrollees, with Child Health Plan Plus reported separately. Eligibility, enrollment and renewal rules concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a change in enrollment. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Medicaid and Child Health Plan Plus enrollment · Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

The act makes the following changes to health insurance coverage for low-income pregnant people and children in low-income families: Provides full health insurance coverage for Colorado pregnant people who would be eligible for medicaid and the children's basic health plan (CHIP) if not for their immigration status and continues that coverage for 12 months postpartum at the CHIP federal matching rate; Provides comprehensive health insurance coverage for all Colorado children who would be eligible for medicaid and CHIP if not for their immigration status; Requires the state department of health care policy and financing (department) to create an outreach and enrollment strategy for enrolling eligible groups into new coverage options; Requires the department to report to the joint budget committee in its 2024 presentation, as well as in its "State Measurement for Accountable, Responsive, and Transparent (SMART) Government Act" reports, beginning in January 2026, information concerning the state-funded health and medical care program, the state children's basic health plan, and its plans and progress in implementing the coverage expansion for lawfully residing persons; Allows the state controller to allow the department to make an expenditure in excess of the amount authorized if the amount is for the state medical assistance program or the state children's basic health plan; Provides comprehensive lactation support services, lactation supplies and equipment, and maintenance of multi-use loaned equipment. Removes the annual enrollment fee for a family whose income is at or below one hundred fifty percent of the federal poverty line or an enrollee who is a pregnant person. Draws down federal funds to improve perinatal and postpartum support and requires that priorities for the funds be determined through a stakeholder process; Creates a special enrollment period for health insurance coverage due to pregnancy so that an eligible person can sign up for insurance as soon as the person becomes pregnant; and Improves the quality of health insurance coverage available through the health insurance affordability enterprise.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Colorado Legislature · SB19-180

Eviction Legal Defense Fund

May 30, 2019 · Enacted

Rep. Julie McCluskie · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of SB19-180: Eviction Legal Defense Fund. Official enacted-bill summary: Forcible entry and detainer - legal aid services - eviction legal defense fund - appropriation. The act creates the eviction legal defense fund (fund). The state court administrator awards grants from the fund to qualifying nonprofit organizations (organizations) that provide legal advice, counseling, and representation for, and on behalf of, indigent clients who are experiencing an eviction or are at immediate risk of an eviction. The act lists permissible uses of grant money awarded from the fund. Organizations that receive a grant from the fund are required to report to the state court administrator certain information about persons served and services provided by the organization. The state court administrator is required to evaluate the use of grants from the fund every 5 years and submit that evaluation to the general assembly. For the 2019-20 state fiscal year, $750,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the eviction legal defense fund created through the act. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2019-05-30: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Colorado’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Forcible entry and detainer - legal aid services - eviction legal defense fund - appropriation. The act creates the eviction legal defense fund (fund). The state court administrator awards grants from the fund to qualifying nonprofit organizations (organizations) that provide legal advice, counseling, and representation for, and on behalf of, indigent clients who are experiencing an eviction or are at immediate risk of an eviction. The act lists permissible uses of grant money awarded from the fund. Organizations that receive a grant from the fund are required to report to the state court administrator certain information about persons served and services provided by the organization. The state court administrator is required to evaluate the use of grants from the fund every 5 years and submit that evaluation to the general assembly. For the 2019-20 state fiscal year, $750,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the eviction legal defense fund created through the act. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Kyle Brown

Colorado House of Representatives, District 12 · D–CO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Kyle Brown
Colorado Legislature · SB26-193

Local Ordinances & State Employees

Jun 2, 2026 · Enacted

Sen. Judy Amabile · Sponsored / Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer · Sponsored / Rep. Kyle Brown · Sponsored / Rep. Rick Taggart · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prime sponsorship of SB26-193: Local Ordinances & State Employees. Official enacted-bill summary: Existing law authorizes the general assembly to set compensation levels for employees of the state. Accordingly, the act clarifies that, for the purposes of laws concerning local minimum wages, the term 'employer' means a corporation, a proprietorship, a partnership, a joint venture, a limited liability company, a trust, an association, a political subdivision of the state, an individual, or any other entity that employs an employee. However, 'employer' does not include the state of Colorado to the extent that a state employer has a collective bargaining agreement as to employee wages. Current law states that the governing bodies of municipalities have the power to license, regulate, and tax any lawful occupation, business place, amusement, or place of amusements (occupation or business place) and to fix the amount, terms, and manner of issuing and revoking licenses issued to an occupation or business place. The act clarifies that the state of Colorado is not an occupation or business place subject to such tax. The act requires the office of state planning and budgeting to submit to the joint budget committee, on or before January 4, 2027, a supplemental budget request concerning compensation of state employees during the 2026-27 state fiscal year. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)

2026-06-02: Governor Signed. This records legislative disposition, not current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Colorado evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Existing law authorizes the general assembly to set compensation levels for employees of the state. Accordingly, the act clarifies that, for the purposes of laws concerning local minimum wages, the term 'employer' means a corporation, a proprietorship, a partnership, a joint venture, a limited liability company, a trust, an association, a political subdivision of the state, an individual, or any other entity that employs an employee. However, 'employer' does not include the state of Colorado to the extent that a state employer has a collective bargaining agreement as to employee wages. Current law states that the governing bodies of municipalities have the power to license, regulate, and tax any lawful occupation, business place, amusement, or place of amusements (occupation or business place) and to fix the amount, terms, and manner of issuing and revoking licenses issued to an occupation or business place. The act clarifies that the state of Colorado is not an occupation or business place subject to such tax. The act requires the office of state planning and budgeting to submit to the joint budget committee, on or before January 4, 2027, a supplemental budget request concerning compensation of state employees during the 2026-27 state fiscal year. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Colorado officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Colorado statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.