Alabama · individual fact

Alabama real gross domestic product

Alabama’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$259.46B2025 · #27 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth2%2025 · #25 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$339.04B2025 · #27 of 50 · highest first

Alabama over time

Explore Alabama readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alabama officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alabama effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alabama change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP Alabama · source units
AlabamaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $259.46B$0$13.4T$26.79TAlabama, 2014: $206.07BAlabama, 2015: $208.95BAlabama, 2016: $212.86BAlabama, 2017: $216.62BAlabama, 2018: $220.78BAlabama, 2019: $225.24BAlabama, 2020: $222.83BAlabama, 2021: $234.2BAlabama, 2022: $240.21BAlabama, 2023: $247.88BAlabama, 2024: $254.42BAlabama, 2025: $259.46B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 30National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingAlabama · Alabama establishes energy-infrastructure financing programs · 2025-05-14Alabama Powering Growth ActNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● Alabama Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 1■ Alabama agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

2 of 2 reviewed Alabama actions match · 2 date markers shown. 30 major events shown separately.

Alabama · 2025: $259.46B · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Alabama Real GDP · source units
PeriodAlabamaRankU.S. benchmark
2025$259.46B#27 of 50$23.94T
2024$254.42B#27 of 50$23.39T
2023$247.88B#27 of 50$22.72T
2022$240.21B#27 of 50$22.08T
2021$234.2B#27 of 50$21.56T
2020$222.83B#27 of 50$20.28T
2019$225.24B#27 of 50$20.72T
2018$220.78B#27 of 50$20.19T
2017$216.62B#27 of 50$19.61T
2016$212.86B#27 of 50$19.14T
2015$208.95B#26 of 50$18.8T
2014$206.07B#26 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Alabama · state comparison

Alabama output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

Alabama · 2025$259.46B
Alabama rank#27among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Real GDP history in Alabama$-3.35T$12.07T$27.5T20142025
2025 · Alabama: $259.46B · Rank #27 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Real GDP history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2014$206.07B
2015$208.95B
2016$212.86B
2017$216.62B
2018$220.78B
2019$225.24B
2020$222.83B
2021$234.2B
2022$240.21B
2023$247.88B
2024$254.42B
2025$259.46B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · $259.46B2025 · Rank #27 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama · your comparison$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

What makes up Alabama GDP?

Choose an industry to compare Alabama’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

Alabama · 2025$3.29B
Alabama rank#26among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in Alabama$-42.15B$147.55B$337.25B20142025
2025 · Alabama: $3.29B · Rank #26 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2014$2.62B
2015$2.67B
2016$2.07B
2017$2.43B
2018$2.48B
2019$2.05B
2020$1.63B
2021$2.88B
2022$4.22B
2023$3.23B
2024$3.29B
2025$3.29B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · $3.29B2025 · Rank #26 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama · your comparison$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

Alabama · 20252,966,686
Alabama rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Total employment · jobs history in Alabama-29,813,399110,438,570250,690,53920142025
2025 · Alabama: 2,966,686 · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Total employment · jobs history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
20142,552,440
20152,588,343
20162,620,754
20172,650,481
20182,694,479
20192,714,795
20202,674,699
20212,773,723
20222,862,313
20232,904,378
20242,942,187
20252,966,686

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 2,966,6862025 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama · your comparison2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Alabama candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

5 statements from 4 candidates

2026 Alabama Public Service Commissioner, Place 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Jim Zig Zeigler

1 statement

Republican · Public Service Commissioner, Place 2 · AL

Economic growth & production context

I will insist on cost allocation structures that protect residential ratepayers when large commercial projects require new infrastructure. I will serve as a Watchman, letting the public and local officials know about these intrusions before they are a done deal. Alabama welcomes economic development…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: My Commitment

Candidate campaign source

I will insist on cost allocation structures that protect residential ratepayers when large commercial projects require new infrastructure. I will serve as a Watchman, letting the public and local officials know about these intrusions before they are a done deal. Alabama welcomes economic development — with fair cost allocation.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jim Zig Zeigler — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Alabama U.S. House — District 6 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Gary Palmer

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 6 · AL

Economic growth & production context

Gary Palmer believes free markets create opportunity when government gets out of the way. America has vast energy resources that—if responsibly developed—could drive job creation, lower costs, and fuel long-term economic growth. Excessive regulation has kept these resources off-limits, limiting grow…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National Debt

Candidate campaign source

Gary Palmer believes free markets create opportunity when government gets out of the way. America has vast energy resources that—if responsibly developed—could drive job creation, lower costs, and fuel long-term economic growth. Excessive regulation has kept these resources off-limits, limiting growth and innovation. Palmer supports policies that reduce unnecessary burdens on businesses, expand domestic energy production, and allow the private sector to do what it does best: create jobs, strengthen the economy, and keep America competitive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Gary Palmer — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Maurice Mercer

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 6 · AL

Economic growth & production context

Having owned and operated a small business and worked closely with entrepreneurs throughout my career, I understand both the opportunities and challenges facing Main Street America . Small businesses create jobs, strengthen communities, and drive economic growth. I will work to reduce unnecessary re…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Our Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Having owned and operated a small business and worked closely with entrepreneurs throughout my career, I understand both the opportunities and challenges facing Main Street America . Small businesses create jobs, strengthen communities, and drive economic growth. I will work to reduce unnecessary regulations, expand access to capital, improve broadband infrastructure, and create an environment where entrepreneurs can compete fairly against large corporate interests. When small businesses succeed, communities succeed. Main Street deserves a champion in Washington.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Maurice Mercer — campaign source ↗
View 1 more statement from Maurice Mercer
Economic growth & production context

Having owned and operated a small business and worked closely with entrepreneurs throughout my career, I understand both the opportunities and challenges facing Main Street America. Small businesses create jobs, strengthen communities, and drive economic growth. I will work to reduce unnecessary reg…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Small Business and Main Street Growth

Candidate campaign source

Having owned and operated a small business and worked closely with entrepreneurs throughout my career, I understand both the opportunities and challenges facing Main Street America. Small businesses create jobs, strengthen communities, and drive economic growth. I will work to reduce unnecessary regulations, expand access to capital, improve broadband infrastructure, and create an environment where entrepreneurs can compete fairly against large corporate interests. When small businesses succeed, communities succeed. Main Street deserves a champion in Washington.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Maurice Mercer — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Alabama U.S. House — District 7 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Terri A. Sewell

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 7 · AL

Economic growth & production context

The story of Alabama’s 7th District is the story of our fight for civil rights and voting rights for all Americans. By preserving that story and sharing it with the public, we can cultivate a stronger understanding of our nation’s history and generate economic growth here at home.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Historic Preservation

Candidate campaign source

The story of Alabama’s 7th District is the story of our fight for civil rights and voting rights for all Americans. By preserving that story and sharing it with the public, we can cultivate a stronger understanding of our nation’s history and generate economic growth here at home.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Historic Preservation - Terri Sewell for Congress Historic Preservation - Terri Sewell for Congress ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alabama candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Alabama incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alabama legislators and Alabama’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alabama’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Alabama incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.

Sen. Arthur Orr

Alabama Senate, District 3 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Arthur Orr
Alabama Legislature · SB 304

Powering Growth Act established, Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank and the Strategic Energy Procurement Fund established under the State Industrial Development Authority to assist in obtaining equipment and providing financing for qualified energy infrastructure projects

May 14, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Arthur Orr · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The Powering Growth Act establishes financing and procurement mechanisms for electric infrastructure, including generation, transmission, and long-lead equipment. It can affect the range of future generating resources but does not mandate a natural-gas generation share or prove that a plant has been built.

Enacted. Latest official history entry: Enacted (2025-05-14). This records historical enactment; later amendments and current enforceability are not inferred.

Why this record is included

Natural-gas share is the portion of Alabama in-state electricity net generation supplied by natural gas. Gas-fired plants and alternative generating resources concern this mix; in-state generation differs from electricity consumed in the state. Procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from operating plants or measured output. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Natural gas share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(7) ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS. Generation infrastructure, transmission infrastructure, and projects addressing long-lead items. […] §41-10-48.04 (a) There is created within the authority a division to be known as the Alabama Energy Infrastructure Bank. (b) In recognition of increasing concerns regarding energy capacity and the resilience of Alabama's energy infrastructure for current and future needs, the corporate purpose of the energy bank is to support the economic growth of the state by identifying and supporting energy infrastructure projects for eligible projects in Alabama. (c) The energy bank will accomplish these goals through the utilization of bond financing and other financial assistance for energy infrastructure projects. (d) The energy bank will utilize existing and future revenue sources in order to create the necessary funding streams to secure bond financing and other financial assistance that will allow the state to enhance and expand its energy infrastructure. (e) Through the energy bank, the authority may act as a state energy financing institution as that term is defined 42 U.S.C. § 16511(7)(A), or any successor statute, for purposes of obtaining federal support for Alabama energy infrastructure projects. (f) The Alabama Energy Infrastructure Fund is created in the State Treasury. All proceeds from the revenues designated to the energy fund, pursuant to this act and any other provision of law, shall be deposited into the energy fund to be expended only as provided in this act. (g) In undertaking its responsibilities under this Act, the authority may request that the Alabama Growth Alliance review and provide feedback on authority programs and activities which may include, but is not limited to, their alignment with the state's economic growth priorities. §41-10-48.05 In addition to the powers granted to it in Section 41-10-26, Sections 41-10-37 through 41-10-43, Sections 41-10-44.1 through 41-10-44.15, and Sections 41-10-47.01 through 41-10-47.09, with respect to the energy bank and the energy fund, the authority shall have the following additional powers to: (1) Make loans or provide other financial assistance to electric providers to finance or reduce the costs of eligible projects, to collect fees and charges related to such loans or other financial assistance, and to acquire, hold, pledge, and sell loan obligations at prices and in a manner as the authority determines advisable. […] §41-10-48.06 (a) In considering applications for eligible projects, the authority may request additional input from external experts as to the urgency of the energy infrastructure project, the ability of the applicant to execute the project within the stated time frame, and other assistance as determined by the authority. (b) The total aggregate amount of loans or other financial assistance provided by the bank in any year shall be limited to an amount that would not jeopardize the viability of the fund, as determined by the authority with the advice of external experts. (c) In selecting eligible projects, the authority shall consider, with assistance from external experts, project feasibility and the degree of financial risk to be assumed by the authority. (d) The authority shall ensure that no electric provider receives more than 40 percent of the loan or financial assistance funds provided by the bank in each calendar year unless a joint application of electric provider is made; provided, however, in no event (even with a joint application) shall more than 50 percent of the loan or financial assistance funds provided by the bank in each calendar year be received by any single electric provider. (e) The authority shall reserve at least 40 percent of the aggregate amount available in each calendar year for loans and other financial assistance from the energy bank for use for energy infrastructure projects in rural areas. In the event that applications are not received for energy infrastructure projects in the rural areas by the close of the second quarter of the applicable calendar year, such reservation shall no longer apply and such funds may be used for other energy infrastructure projects; provided, however, that, in failing to apply for an energy infrastructure project by the end of the second calendar quarter of a calendar year, an electric provider is not prohibited from subsequently applying and receiving an allocation of funds for energy infrastructure projects in rural areas later in that calendar year. (f) Any nonpublic or proprietary information included in an application by an economic development prospect or electric provider shall be subject to the Department of Commerce's protections for such information, provided in Section 41-29-3.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Alabama officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alabama statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.