Alabama · individual fact

Alabama health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages8.2%2024 · #19 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 6510%2024 · #18 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6570.4%2024 · #31 of 50 · highest first

Alabama over time

Explore Alabama readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Alabama officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Alabama effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Alabama change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Alabama · source units
AlabamaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 8.2%7.2%10.1%13.1%Alabama, 2014: 12.1%Alabama, 2015: 10.1%Alabama, 2016: 9.1%Alabama, 2017: 9.4%Alabama, 2018: 10%Alabama, 2019: 9.7%Alabama, 2021: 9.9%Alabama, 2022: 8.8%Alabama, 2023: 8.5%Alabama, 2024: 8.2%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 23National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)Alabama · Alabama approves paid parental leave for eligible public employees · 2025-04-02Alabama public-employee parental leaveNational context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginAlabama · Alabama approves breast-examination cost-sharing restrictions · 2026-03-05Alabama breast-examination coverageNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Alabama Legislature · 173● U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · 82◆ Governor · 8■ Alabama agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2010-03-012026-06-30

33 of 33 reviewed Alabama actions match · 30 date markers shown. 23 major events shown separately.

Alabama · 2024: 8.2% · Rank #19 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Alabama Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodAlabamaRankU.S. benchmark
20248.2%#19 of 508.2%
20238.5%#16 of 50Not available
20228.8%#13 of 50Not available
20219.9%#14 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20199.7%#17 of 50Not available
201810%#14 of 50Not available
20179.4%#14 of 50Not available
20169.1%#15 of 50Not available
201510.1%#19 of 50Not available
201412.1%#17 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Alabama · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Alabama · 20248.2%
Alabama rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Alabama7.6%10.2%12.7%20142024
2024 · Alabama: 8.2% · Rank #19 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
201412.1%
201510.1%
20169.1%
20179.4%
201810%
20199.7%
2020Not available
20219.9%
20228.8%
20238.5%
20248.2%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 8.2%2024 · Rank #19 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama · your comparison8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under age 65 without health insurance

10.0%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Alabama’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate and is not the same as current Medicaid enrollment or an administrative coverage count.
  • Coverage status alone does not measure affordability, provider access, quality, or prescription-drug costs.
Alabama · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Alabama with every state.

Alabama · 2020$9,280
Alabama rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Alabama$6.84K$8.73K$10.63K20142020
2020 · Alabama: $9,280 · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
2014$7,277
2015$7,657
2016$7,968
2017$8,154
2018$8,343
2019$8,741
2020$9,280

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · $9,2802020 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama · your comparison$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Alabama · 202273.8 years
Alabama rank#44among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Alabama population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Life expectancy at birth history in Alabama71.2 years74.8 years78.3 years20182022
2022 · Alabama: 73.8 years · Rank #44 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
201875.1 years
201975.2 years
202073.2 years
202172 years
202273.8 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 73.8 years2022 · Rank #44 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama · your comparison73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Alabama · 202314%
Alabama rank#4among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Alabama
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Alabama9.4%12%14.6%20192023
2023 · Alabama: 14% · Rank #4 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Alabama Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodAlabamaCompare
201912.4%
202013.1%
202113.5%
202213.6%
202314%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 14%2023 · Rank #4 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 12.7% – 15.3%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama · your comparison14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Alabama · June 30, 202663%
Alabama rank#10among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 63%June 30, 2026 · Rank #10 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama · your comparison63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Alabama · 2020$6,393
Alabama rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · $6,3932020 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama · your comparison$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Alabama · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Alabama · 2023–202423%
Alabama rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Alabama stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Alabama has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Alabama · 23%2023–2024 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Alabama with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama · your comparison23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Alabama candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

81 statements from 12 candidates

2026 Alabama Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 32 statements

Doug Jones

32 statements

Democratic · Governor · AL

Health coverage

Stop turning down roughly $182 million in federal healthcare funding each year. This is money paid in Medicaid taxes by Alabamians but not coming back home.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Stop turning down roughly $182 million in federal healthcare funding each year. This is money paid in Medicaid taxes by Alabamians but not coming back home.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
View 31 more statements from Doug Jones
Health coverage

Over 154,000 hard working Alabamians, such as restaurant workers, construction workers, and home healthcare aides, fall into the health insruance coverage gap: they earn too much for Medicaid but too little for private insurance.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Over 154,000 hard working Alabamians, such as restaurant workers, construction workers, and home healthcare aides, fall into the health insruance coverage gap: they earn too much for Medicaid but too little for private insurance.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Health coverage

Strengthen mental health and addiction treatment Use expansion to access the 90% federal match for services Alabama is currently funding with state-only dollars (including $26.1 million for mental health and substance abuse programs). Expanding Medicaid expands access to treatment. People with Medic…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen mental health and addiction treatment Use expansion to access the 90% federal match for services Alabama is currently funding with state-only dollars (including $26.1 million for mental health and substance abuse programs). Expanding Medicaid expands access to treatment. People with Medicaid are twice as likely to receive opioid addiction treatment as those without coverage. Follow evidence from other states: Kentucky saw a 700% increase in substance use disorder services and a 79% decrease in opioid-related hospitalizations for the uninsured after expansion.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Health coverage

Strengthen the workforce through healthcare Medicaid expansion can help people stay healthy and employed and is projected to create nearly 30,000 jobs and $2.76 billion in economic activity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen the workforce through healthcare Medicaid expansion can help people stay healthy and employed and is projected to create nearly 30,000 jobs and $2.76 billion in economic activity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Health coverage

The opioid and mental health crisis can’t be solved without Medicaid expansion. Studies show that adults with Medicaid are twice as likely to get treatment.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

The opioid and mental health crisis can’t be solved without Medicaid expansion. Studies show that adults with Medicaid are twice as likely to get treatment.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Health coverage

Expanding Medicaid expands access to treatment. People with Medicaid are twice as likely to receive opioid addiction treatment as those without coverage.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Expanding Medicaid expands access to treatment. People with Medicaid are twice as likely to receive opioid addiction treatment as those without coverage.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Health coverage

Bring Alabama’s healthcare dollars home Stop turning down roughly $182 million in federal healthcare funding each year. This is money paid in Medicaid taxes by Alabamians but not coming back home.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Bring Alabama’s healthcare dollars home Stop turning down roughly $182 million in federal healthcare funding each year. This is money paid in Medicaid taxes by Alabamians but not coming back home.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Health coverage

Expand Medicaid and close the coverage gap Cover more than 154,000 working Alabamians who earn too much for Alabama’s restrictive Medicaid but too little to afford private insurance.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Expand Medicaid and close the coverage gap Cover more than 154,000 working Alabamians who earn too much for Alabama’s restrictive Medicaid but too little to afford private insurance.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Health coverage

Medicaid expansion can help people stay healthy and employed and is projected to create nearly 30,000 jobs and $2.76 billion in economic activity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Medicaid expansion can help people stay healthy and employed and is projected to create nearly 30,000 jobs and $2.76 billion in economic activity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Health coverage

Expand Medicaid and close the coverage gap Cover more than 154,000 working Alabamians who earn too much for Alabama’s restrictive Medicaid but too little to afford private insurance. Highlight the reality: a family of three making more than $4,650 annually doesn’t qualify under current rules.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Expand Medicaid and close the coverage gap Cover more than 154,000 working Alabamians who earn too much for Alabama’s restrictive Medicaid but too little to afford private insurance. Highlight the reality: a family of three making more than $4,650 annually doesn’t qualify under current rules.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Health coverage

Alabama is turning down federal healthcare dollars while families struggle, hospitals close, and working people fall into the coverage gap. Doug’s priority is straightforward: expand Medicaid to lower costs, protect rural care, and strengthen the workforce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Alabama is turning down federal healthcare dollars while families struggle, hospitals close, and working people fall into the coverage gap. Doug’s priority is straightforward: expand Medicaid to lower costs, protect rural care, and strengthen the workforce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Health coverage

Expand Medicaid and close the coverage gap

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Expand Medicaid and close the coverage gap

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Health coverage

Cover more than 154,000 working Alabamians who earn too much for Alabama’s restrictive Medicaid but too little to afford private insurance.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Cover more than 154,000 working Alabamians who earn too much for Alabama’s restrictive Medicaid but too little to afford private insurance.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Invest proceeds in Alabama priorities Use revenue to strengthen communities — including options like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other voter-directed priorities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Invest proceeds in Alabama priorities Use revenue to strengthen communities — including options like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other voter-directed priorities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Healthcare costs

Lower healthcare costs and less medical debt

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Lower healthcare costs and less medical debt

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Keep rural hospitals open and reduce uncompensated care Alabama has lost six rural hospitals since 2011; neighboring expansion-state Arkansas lost zero in that period.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Keep rural hospitals open and reduce uncompensated care Alabama has lost six rural hospitals since 2011; neighboring expansion-state Arkansas lost zero in that period.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Keep rural hospitals open and reduce uncompensated care

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Keep rural hospitals open and reduce uncompensated care

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Make expansion an economic strategy, not just a healthcare policy A 2022 analysis projected expansion would generate $2.76 billion in additional economic activity in Alabama in 2026 and create nearly 30,000 jobs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Make expansion an economic strategy, not just a healthcare policy A 2022 analysis projected expansion would generate $2.76 billion in additional economic activity in Alabama in 2026 and create nearly 30,000 jobs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Keep rural hospitals open and reduce uncompensated care Alabama has lost six rural hospitals since 2011; neighboring expansion-state Arkansas lost zero in that period. Reduce the roughly $650 million in annual uncompensated care costs that threaten hospital stability. Learn from expansion states whe…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Keep rural hospitals open and reduce uncompensated care Alabama has lost six rural hospitals since 2011; neighboring expansion-state Arkansas lost zero in that period. Reduce the roughly $650 million in annual uncompensated care costs that threaten hospital stability. Learn from expansion states where uncompensated care dropped sharply (e.g., 45% in Montana in the first year).

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Care & public health

Use expansion to access the 90% federal match for services Alabama is currently funding with state-only dollars (including $26.1 million for mental health and substance abuse programs).

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Use expansion to access the 90% federal match for services Alabama is currently funding with state-only dollars (including $26.1 million for mental health and substance abuse programs).

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Strengthen the workforce through healthcare

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen the workforce through healthcare

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Expand Healthcare & Close the Coverage Gap

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Expand Healthcare & Close the Coverage Gap

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Use revenue to strengthen communities — including options like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other voter-directed priorities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Use revenue to strengthen communities — including options like education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other voter-directed priorities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Alabama turns down about $182 million in federal healthcare funding every year.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Alabama turns down about $182 million in federal healthcare funding every year.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Strengthen mental health and addiction treatment

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen mental health and addiction treatment

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Bring Alabama’s healthcare dollars home

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Bring Alabama’s healthcare dollars home

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

While politicians argue, Alabama loses hundreds of millions of dollars each year that could be invested in education, healthcare, and infrastructure.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

While politicians argue, Alabama loses hundreds of millions of dollars each year that could be invested in education, healthcare, and infrastructure.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Since 2011, Alabama has lost six rural hospitals; expansion-state Arkansas lost zero.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Since 2011, Alabama has lost six rural hospitals; expansion-state Arkansas lost zero.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Strengthen mental health and addiction treatment Use expansion to access the 90% federal match for services Alabama is currently funding with state-only dollars (including $26.1 million for mental health and substance abuse programs).

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Strengthen mental health and addiction treatment Use expansion to access the 90% federal match for services Alabama is currently funding with state-only dollars (including $26.1 million for mental health and substance abuse programs).

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Alabama has lost six rural hospitals since 2011; neighboring expansion-state Arkansas lost zero in that period.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Alabama has lost six rural hospitals since 2011; neighboring expansion-state Arkansas lost zero in that period.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Stronger rural hospitals and local jobs

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Stronger rural hospitals and local jobs

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗
Care & public health

Make expansion an economic strategy, not just a healthcare policy

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Doug’s Priorities for Alabama

Candidate campaign source

Make expansion an economic strategy, not just a healthcare policy

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Doug Jones — campaign source ↗

2026 Alabama U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

2026 Alabama U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Lee McInnis

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · AL

Health coverage

Reverse federal cuts that reduce Medicaid and SNAP support for low-income and rural communities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Safety Net

Candidate campaign source

Reverse federal cuts that reduce Medicaid and SNAP support for low-income and rural communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Lee McInnis — Part 70 verified source ↗
View 2 more statements from Lee McInnis
Care & public health

Protect rural hospitals and preserve essential local health-care capacity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Rural Health Care

Candidate campaign source

Protect rural hospitals and preserve essential local health-care capacity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Lee McInnis — Part 70 verified source ↗
Care & public health

Guarantee access to health care for every American.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health Care

Candidate campaign source

Guarantee access to health care for every American.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Lee McInnis — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Alabama candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Alabama incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Alabama legislators and Alabama’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Alabama’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

25 matching sponsorships or proposals · 20 Alabama incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Arnold Mooney

Alabama House of Representatives, District 43 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Arnold Mooney
Alabama Legislature · HB 564

Public assistance, regular cross-checks required for Medicaid and food assistance eligibility

Apr 10, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Arnold Mooney · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require Medicaid eligibility verification and recurring matches against state and federal records to assess continued eligibility. It addresses insurance enrollment and continuity and did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2025-04-10). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: People under age 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (a) For the purposes of this section, the term "eligibility" refers to eligibility for participation in or receipt of benefits from Medicaid. (b)(1) The Alabama Medicaid Agency may not accept eligibility determinations from an Exchange established under 42 U.S.C. § 18041(c). (2) The agency may accept assessments from an Exchange established under 42 U.S.C. § 18041(c), provided that the agency verifies eligibility and makes eligibility determinations. (c) Except where required by federal law, the Alabama Medicaid Agency may not: (1) Accept self-attestation of income, residency, age, household composition, caretaker or relative status, or receipt of other coverage without verifying that information prior to enrollment; or (2) Request the authority to waive or decline to periodically check any available income-related data sources to verify eligibility. (d) The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall enter into data matching agreements to receive and review information that may indicate a change in circumstances that may affect eligibility and cross-check households enrolled in Medicaid with other state data sets as follows: (1) On at least a monthly basis, information from each of the following: a. The Alabama Department of Public Health, including, but not limited to, death records. b. The Department of Human Resources, including, but not limited to, potential changes in residency as identified by out-of-state electronic benefit (EBT) transactions. c. The Department of Corrections, including, but not limited to, incarceration status. (2) On at least a quarterly basis, information from each of the following: a. The Department of Workforce, including, but not limited to, changes in employment, income, wages, assets, or disability status. b. The Department of Revenue, including, but not limited to, potential changes in income, wages, or residency as identified by tax records. (e) At least once a month, the Alabama Medicaid Agency must assess continued eligibility and act on any changes that may affect eligibility based on a review of data from the following federal sources: (1) From the United States Social Security Administration, earned income information, death register information, incarceration records, supplemental security income information, beneficiary records, earnings information, and pension information. (2) From the United States Department of Health and Human Services, income and employment information maintained in the National Directory of New Hires database and child support enforcement data. (3) From the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, payment and earnings information. (4) From the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation, national fleeing felon information. (f) On at least a quarterly basis, the Alabama Medicaid Agency shall make available on its public website all of the following data from findings on noncompliance and fraud investigations, provided the data is presented in the aggregate and does not include confidential or personally identifying information: (1) The number of Medicaid cases investigated for intentional program violations or fraud. (2) The total number of Medicaid cases referred to the Attorney General's office for prosecution. (3) Improper payments and expenditures. (4) Monies received. (5) Aggregate data concerning improper payments and ineligible recipients as a percentage of those investigated and reviewed. (g) The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall adopt rules to implement and administer this section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Barbara Drummond

Alabama House of Representatives, District 103 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Barbara Drummond
Alabama Legislature · HB 103

Firearms; storage requirements provided; criminal penalty for violation resulting in possession by minor under certain circumstances, subject to exceptions

Feb 4, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Barbara Drummond · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would require parents or guardians to reasonably secure firearms from minors and impose a misdemeanor when a storage violation leads to a minor unlawfully possessing a firearm at a public school, subject to specified exceptions. It did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2025-02-04). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. (a) For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings: (1) FIREARM. The term as defined in Section 13A-8-1, Code of Alabama 1975. (2) MINOR. An individual that is 18 years of age or younger. (3) PUBLIC SCHOOL. A public school composed of grades K-12, including a public school bus used for grades K-12. (4) REASONABLY SECURE. Includes, but is not limited to, storing a firearm using a trigger lock or in a locked box or gun safe that requires a key, numerical or alphanumerical combination, or fingerprint to open. (b) A parent or legal guardian of a minor shall store a firearm in his or her possession or under his or her control in a manner that reasonably secures the firearm from unauthorized or unlawful access by a minor. (c) If a minor gains access to a firearm and unlawfully possesses the firearm on the premises of a public school as a proximate result of a violation of subsection (b), the parent or legal guardian is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. (d) This section shall not apply to any of the following: (1) A minor in possession of a firearm pursuant to Section 13A-11-72 (f) or (g), Code of Alabama 1975. (2) A minor in possession of a firearm that is in a motor vehicle while the vehicle is in a parking area owned or operated by a public school. Section 2. This act shall become effective on October 1, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Gary J. Palmer

U.S. House of Representatives, Alabama District 6 · R–AL

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Gary J. Palmer
U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · HR 2793

Retirement Freedom Act

Apr 9, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Gary J. Palmer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The Retirement Freedom Act proposal would let an individual opt out of Medicare Part A without being required to give up Social Security title II benefits. Its narrow Social Security connection is that benefit-retention provision; it does not establish new OASDI beneficiaries.

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: People receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Allowing individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A benefitAny individual who is otherwise entitled to benefits under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act may elect (in such form and manner as may be specified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) to opt out of such entitlement. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of an individual who makes such an election, such individual— (1)may (in such form and manner as may be specified by the Secretary) subsequently choose to end such election and opt back into such entitlement (in accordance with a process determined by the Secretary) without being subject to any penalty; (2)shall not be required to opt out of benefits under title II of such Act as a condition for making such election; and (3)shall not be required to repay any amount paid under such part A for items and services furnished prior to making such election.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Alabama delegation · HR 1776

New Health Options Act of 2025

Mar 3, 2025 · In Congress

Rep. Gary J. Palmer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The New Health Options Act proposal would establish federal reinsurance payments for specified individual-market plans, with the stated purpose of lowering premiums. It concerns the cost and availability of health insurance, not a measured reduction in Alabama’s uninsured rate.

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: People under age 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1344.Reinsurance program for certain off-Exchange plans(a)In generalThere is established a Reinsurance Program, to be administered by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to provide payments to health insurance issuers with respect to claims for eligible individuals for the purpose of lowering premiums for such individuals.(b)Funding(1)AppropriationFor the purpose of providing funding for the Reinsurance Program, for each year during the period beginning on January 1, 2026, and ending on December 31, 2030, there is appropriated out of any monies in the Treasury not otherwise obligated an amount equal to the product of $50 and the aggregate number of member months for all eligible individuals enrolled in a covered plan during such year.(2)Limitation on appropriationIn no year shall the appropriation for the Reinsurance Program authorized in paragraph (1) exceed $6,000,000,000.(3)Use of unexpended fundsAppropriated amounts remaining unexpended at the end of any year may be used to make payments under the Reinsurance Program in any future year.(4)Limitation on use of fundsNo funds received under the Reinsurance Program may be used to pay for services described in section 1303(b)(1)(B)(i) (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this section).(c)Operation of program(1)In generalThe Secretary shall establish parameters for the operation of the Reinsurance Program consistent with this section.(2)Deadline for initial operationNot later than 120 days after the date of the enactment, the Secretary shall establish sufficient parameters to specify how the Program will operate for 2026.(3)DefinitionsIn this section:(A)Covered planThe term covered plan means individual health insurance coverage (as such term is defined in section 2791 of the Public Health Service Act)—(i)with respect to which the issuer of such coverage has made the election described in section 1312(c)(1)(A); and(ii)that does not provide coverage for services described in section 1303(b)(1)(B)(i) (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this section).(B)Eligible individualThe term eligible individual means an individual enrolled in a covered plan.(d)Attachment dollar amount and payment proportion(1)In generalThe Secretary shall annually establish an attachment point, payment proportion, and reinsurance cap with respect to claims for eligible individuals for payments under the Reinsurance Program, consistent with the following:(A)The attachment point for the period beginning January 1, 2026, and ending December 31, 2026, shall be $110,000.(B)The payment proportion for the period beginning January 1, 2026, and ending December 31, 2026, shall be 90 percent.(C)The reinsurance cap for the period beginning January 1, 2026 and ending December 31, 2026, shall be $300,000.(2)Adjustment authorityThe Secretary may adjust any amounts described in paragraph (1) as necessary to ensure the Reinsurance Program does not make payment for a year in excess of the amount available for such year under subsection (b)..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Jamie Kiel

Alabama House of Representatives, District 18 · R–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Jamie Kiel
Alabama Legislature · HB 611

Abortion producing drug; prohibitions provided relating to access to abortion producing drugs via the internet or other information technology systems, Attorney General authorized to enforce, civil cause of action created, criminal penalties provided

Apr 24, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Jamie Kiel · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would restrict internet, telecommunications, hosting, and payment services used to obtain abortion-producing drugs for delivery in Alabama, with exceptions and enforcement provisions. It did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2025-04-24). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact counts induced terminations for Alabama residents in 2024, including events in other states reported back to Alabama. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this resident-based measure, which does not capture every out-of-state event. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Reported induced terminations among Alabama residents. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 3. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b): (1) No Internet service provider serving persons in the State of Alabama may accept or forward any HTTP request to an IP address at which is addressed an application that permits any person to obtain abortion producing drugs for delivery in the State of Alabama. (2) No cell phone service provider serving persons in the State of Alabama may accept or forward from its domain name service servers any HTTP request to an IP address at which is addressed an application that permits any person to obtain abortion producing drugs for delivery in the State of Alabama. (3) No content delivery network provider may accept or route any HTTP request to an IP address at which is addressed an application that permits any person to obtain abortion producing drugs in the State of Alabama. (4) No person offering abortion producing drugs may enroll any person as a customer in any system providing information technology which permits the person to obtain abortion producing drugs for delivery in the State of Alabama. (5) No software-as-a-service provider may allow its SaaS product or service to offer for sale any abortion producing drugs for delivery to any person in the State of Alabama, or to otherwise enroll any user in such a system to purchase abortion producing drugs for delivery in the state. (6) No platform-as-a-service provider may allow its information technology capabilities to be used by any SaaS provider or other person to offer for sale any abortion producing drugs for delivery to any person in the State of Alabama, or to otherwise enroll any user in such a system to purchase abortion producing drugs for delivery in the state. (7) No infrastructure-as-a-service provider may allow its information technology capabilities to be used by any PaaS or SaaS provider or other person to offer for sale any abortion producing drugs for delivery to any person in the State of Alabama or to otherwise enroll any user in such a system to purchase abortion producing drugs. (8) No physical data center may allow its physical facilities to host any information technology capabilities to be used by any person to offer for sale any abortion producing drugs for delivery to any person in the State of Alabama, or to otherwise enroll any user in such a system to purchase abortion producing drugs. (9) No payment provider may facilitate payment for any abortion producing drug to be delivered to any person in the State of Alabama. (b) Notwithstanding any other law, subsection (a) does not prohibit any of the following: (1) Speech or conduct protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The speech or conduct prohibited by this act is only for the purpose of prohibiting the use of abortion producing drugs in the State of Alabama in violation of Chapter 23H of Title 26, Code of Alabama 1975. (2) Conduct engaged in by a pregnant woman who aborts or attempts to abort her unborn child. (3) Possessing, distributing, mailing, transporting, delivering, or providing an abortion producing drug for a medical purpose that does not include performing, inducing, or attempting an abortion. (c)(1) For any provider or service who is not the person providing the abortion producing drug, the first violation of this section shall be a Class C felony. (2) For any provider or service who is not the person providing the abortion producing drug, any second or subsequent violation of this section shall be a Class B felony.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Juandalynn Givan

Alabama House of Representatives, District 60 · D–AL

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Juandalynn Givan
Alabama Legislature · HB 46

Abortion; authorized to preserve health of mother or if pregnancy result of rape or incest; man convicted of rape or incest required to pay for abortion and undergo vasectomy; mother of unborn child who undergoes abortion to preserve her health authorized to petition to require father of unborn child to pay for certain abortion costs; judge authorized to excuse father from payment if he undergoes vasectomy

Jan 13, 2026 · Not enacted

Rep. Juandalynn Givan · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The introduced proposal would permit abortion to preserve the mother’s health and for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. It also sets pregnancy-related payment and court procedures, including vasectomy or castration requirements for a man convicted of the rape or incest. The proposal did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2026-01-13). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact counts induced terminations for Alabama residents in 2024, including events in other states reported back to Alabama. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this resident-based measure, which does not capture every out-of-state event. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Reported induced terminations among Alabama residents. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"§26-23H-4 (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to intentionally perform or attempt to perform an abortion except as provided for by subsection (b) or (c). (b) An abortion shall be permitted if an attending physician determines that an abortion is necessary in order to preserve the health of the unborn child's mother. Except in the case of a medical emergency , the physician's determination shall be confirmed in writing by a second physician . The confirmation shall occur within 180 days after the abortion is completed and shall be prima facie evidence for a permitted abortion. (c)(1) An abortion shall be permitted if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. (2) If a man is convicted of the act of rape or incest and the act results in pregnancy, the court shall require him to: (i) pay for all medical expenses associated with the resulting pregnancy and abortion; and (ii) undergo either a vasectomy or castration." Section 2. Section 26-23H-4.1 is added to the Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows: §26-23H-4.1 (a) If an abortion is necessary to preserve the health of an unborn child's mother pursuant to Section 26-23H-4, the mother of the unborn child may petition the circuit court to require the unborn child's father to pay all medical expenses associated with the pregnancy and the abortion including, but not limited to, expenses associated with any complications resulting from the pregnancy or abortion. (b) A father required to pay for expenses pursuant to subsection (a) may petition the circuit court for relief from those requirements, provided that the father agrees to undergo a vasectomy. A man required to undergo a vasectomy under this subsection must provide the court with documentation of the vasectomy. (c) If a man required to pay for expenses pursuant to subsection (a) disputes that he is the father of the unborn child in question, he may petition the circuit court to adjudicate paternity. If the court determines that the man is the biological father of the unborn child, he must either pay the expenses required by subsection (a) or petition for a grant of relief pursuant to subsection (b). (d)(1) The appropriate venue for an expected proceeding under this section is the circuit court in the county in which the unborn child's alleged father resides or in which the unborn child's mother resides. (2) Court proceedings under this section shall be given precedence over other pending matters as necessary to ensure that the court may reach a decision promptly, but in no case shall the court fail to rule within 48 hours after the time the petition is filed, Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays excluded.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Alabama Legislature · HB 50

Abortion; authorized to preserve health of mother or if pregnancy result of rape or incest; man convicted of rape or incest required to pay for abortion and undergo vasectomy; mother of unborn child who undergoes abortion to preserve her health authorized to petition to require father of unborn child to pay for certain abortion costs; judge authorized to excuse father from payment if he undergoes vasectomy

Feb 4, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Juandalynn Givan · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would permit abortion to preserve the mother’s health and for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest. It would impose payment obligations and vasectomy or castration requirements on a father convicted of the qualifying rape or incest, with separate court procedures for pregnancy-related expenses. It did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Pending Committee Action in House of Origin (2025-02-04). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact counts induced terminations for Alabama residents in 2024, including events in other states reported back to Alabama. Access, restrictions and reporting concern this resident-based measure, which does not capture every out-of-state event. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: Reported induced terminations among Alabama residents. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"§26-23H-4 (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to intentionally perform or attempt to perform an abortion except as provided for by subsection (b) or (c). (b) An abortion shall be permitted if an attending physician licensed in Alabama determines that an abortion is necessary in order to preserve the health of the unborn child's mother. Except in the case of a medical emergency , the physician's determination shall be confirmed in writing by a second physician licensed in Alabama. The confirmation shall occur within 180 days after the abortion is completed and shall be prima facie evidence for a permitted abortion. (c)(1) An abortion shall be permitted if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest. (2) If a man is convicted of the act of rape or incest and the act results in pregnancy, the court shall require him to: (i) pay for all medical expenses associated with the resulting pregnancy and abortion; and (ii) undergo either a vasectomy or castration." Section 2. Section 26-23H-4.1 is added to the Code of Alabama 1975, to read as follows: §26-23H-4.1 (a) If an abortion is necessary to preserve the health of an unborn child's mother pursuant to Section 26-23H-4, the mother of the unborn child may petition the circuit court to require the unborn child's father to pay for all medical expenses associated with the pregnancy and the abortion, including, but not limited to, expenses associated with any complications resulting from the pregnancy. (b) A father required to pay for expenses pursuant to subsection (a) may petition the circuit court for relief from those requirements, provided that the father agrees to undergo a vasectomy. A man required to undergo a vasectomy under this subsection must provide the court with documentation of the vasectomy. (c) If a man required to pay for expenses pursuant to subsection (a) disputes that he is the father of the unborn child in question, he may petition the circuit court to adjudicate paternity. If the court determines that the man is the biological father of the unborn child, he must either pay the expenses required by subsection (a) or petition for a grant of relief pursuant to subsection (b). (d)(1) The appropriate venue for a proceeding under this section is the county in which the unborn child's alleged father resides or in which the unborn child's mother resides. (2) Court proceedings under this section shall be given such precedence over other pending matters as is necessary to ensure that the court may reach a decision promptly, but in no case shall the court fail to rule within 48 hours of the time the petition is filed, Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays excluded. Section 3. This act shall become effective on October 1, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. M. Moore

Alabama House of Representatives, District 59 · D–AL

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. M. Moore
Alabama Legislature · HB 374

Relating to Medicaid; to expand the program to provide assistance to certain state residents; to direct the Alabama Medicaid Agency to implement the expansion; to direct other state agencies and entities to provide certain assistance; and to provide for appropriations for adequate funding.

Apr 25, 2023 · Not enacted

Rep. M. Moore · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The proposal would direct Alabama’s Medicaid Agency to implement Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion and require state funding for the program. It did not become law.

Pending Committee Action in House of Origin. Latest official history entry: Introduced and Referred (2023-04-25). The reviewed session ended without a recorded enactment. Proposed effective dates do not establish that the proposal became law.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Alabama evidence context: People under age 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 2. (a) The Medicaid program shall provide assistance to all persons who apply for and are determined to be eligible for assistance and for whom federal matching funds are available to the state under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, March 23, 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act 4 of 2010, Public Law 111-152, March 30, 2010. (b) The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall take all steps necessary to implement the Medicaid expansion program as provided for in subsection (a) and shall be the lead agency for the implementation in this state. The Alabama Medicaid Agency shall seek assistance from any state or federal agencies or entities to implement the program as appropriate, and all state agencies and entities shall provide assistance as requested by the agency. (c) The Legislature shall annually appropriate adequate funding to the Alabama Medicaid Agency for the purpose of implementing and operating the Medicaid expansion program pursuant to this section. Section 3. This act shall become effective immediately following its passage and approval by the Governor, or its otherwise becoming law.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Alabama officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Alabama statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.