Washington · individual fact

Washington education

Adult credentials, student learning, graduation, and public-school funding.

High school or higher92.3%2020–2024 · #15 of 50 · highest first
Associate degree or higher49.6%2020–2024 · #10 of 50 · highest first
Bachelor’s degree or higher39.6%2020–2024 · #10 of 50 · highest first

Washington over time

Explore Washington readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Washington officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Washington effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Washington change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Grade 4 reading Washington · source units
WashingtonPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Grade 4 reading2024: 215.7213.7220.5227.2Washington, 2003: 221.1Washington, 2005: 223.5Washington, 2007: 224Washington, 2009: 221.3Washington, 2011: 220.5Washington, 2013: 225Washington, 2015: 225.9Washington, 2017: 223.1Washington, 2019: 219.7Washington, 2022: 216.7Washington, 2024: 215.7200320132024
✦ Major events & context · 20National context · Student-aid law ends new FFEL lending and expands Pell funding · 2010-03-30Student-aid reformNational context · Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act signed · 2014-07-22Workforce and adult educationNational context · Every Student Succeeds Act signed · 2015-12-10ESSA signedNational context · Career and technical education law reauthorized · 2018-07-31Perkins V signedNational context · FUTURE Act continues support for minority-serving institutions · 2019-12-19FUTURE Act signedNational context · Pandemic education relief through the CARES Act · 2020-03-27COVID-19 education reliefNational context · Additional pandemic relief for colleges and students · 2020-12-27Second education relief lawNational context · American Rescue Plan expands education relief · 2021-03-11Education recovery fundingNational context · Supreme Court rejects Harvard and UNC race-conscious admissions programs · 2023-06-29College-admissions rulingNational context · Supreme Court rejects the 2022 student-loan cancellation plan · 2023-06-30Student-loan rulingNational context · Pell eligibility restored for qualifying prison education programs · 2023-07-01Prison education Pell accessNational context · Federal student-loan payments resume after pandemic pause · 2023-10-01Student-loan payments resumeNational context · Executive order directs steps toward closing the Education Department · 2025-03-20Federal education orderNational context · 2025 law changes federal student aid and creates Workforce Pell · 2025-07-04Student-aid law signedNational context · Education and Treasury announce student-aid partnership · 2026-03-19Student-aid partnershipNational context · Education announces final student-loan and repayment regulations · 2026-04-30Student-loan final ruleNational context · Education Department announces Workforce Pell final rule · 2026-05-18Workforce Pell ruleNational context · Education announces earnings-accountability final rule · 2026-06-29College earnings accountabilityNational context · Main student-loan limits and new repayment plans take effect · 2026-07-01Student-loan changes beginNational context · First Workforce Pell program approved · 2026-08-04First Workforce Pell approval● Washington Legislature · 336336● U.S. Congress · Washington delegation · 2◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Washington agencies · 12003-12-012026-08-31

36 of 36 reviewed Washington actions match · 22 date markers shown. 20 major events shown separately.

Washington · 2024: 215.7 · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Washington. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8. NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Washington Grade 4 reading · source units
PeriodWashingtonRankU.S. benchmark
2024215.7#18 of 50215
2022216.7#23 of 50217.5
2019219.7#26 of 50220.5
2017223.1#21 of 50221.9
2015225.9#14 of 50222.5
2013225#15 of 50221.8
2011220.5#29 of 50221.2
2009221.3#27 of 50220.9
2007224#18 of 50221
2005223.5#12 of 50219
2003221.1#20 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Washington · state comparison

Adult educational attainment

Adults age 25 and older. Higher credentials overlap: these measures must not be added together.

Washington · 2020–202492.3%
Washington rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark89.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

High school or higher

Share of adults age 25+ with the stated credential or a higher credential.

Point-estimate ranks are not tests of statistical significance.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · 84.7%Higher value · 94.9%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · 92.3%2020–2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
High school or higher · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont94.9%—
#2Maine94.8%—
#3Montana94.6%—
#4New Hampshire94.4%—
#5Wyoming94.2%—
#6North Dakota94%—
#7Minnesota93.9%—
#8Wisconsin93.6%—
#9Alaska93.6%—
#10Utah93.4%—
#11Iowa93.3%—
#12South Dakota93.2%—
#13Hawaii93.2%—
#14Colorado92.9%—
#15Washington · your comparison92.3%—
#16Nebraska92.2%—
#17Pennsylvania92.1%—
#18Michigan92.1%—
#19Kansas92%—
#20Idaho91.9%—
#21Missouri91.9%—
#22Oregon91.8%—
#23Ohio91.8%—
#24Delaware91.7%—
#25Virginia91.6%—
#26Connecticut91.5%—
#27Massachusetts91.4%—
#28Maryland91.1%—
#29New Jersey90.7%—
#30Illinois90.5%—
#31Indiana90.4%—
#32North Carolina90.1%—
#33South Carolina90.1%—
#34Tennessee90%—
#35Florida89.9%—
#36Rhode Island89.7%—
#37Oklahoma89.4%—
#38Arizona89.4%—
#39West Virginia89.3%—
#40Georgia89.2%—
#41Kentucky88.9%—
#42Arkansas88.7%—
#43Alabama88.6%—
#44New Mexico88%—
#45New York88%—
#46Nevada87.5%—
#47Louisiana87.3%—
#48Mississippi87.1%—
#49Texas86%—
#50California84.7%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Adults with at least a high school diploma

92.3%2020–2024 estimate

Share of Washington residents age 25 and older whose reported attainment is a regular high school diploma or equivalent (including GED or an alternative credential), some college, or an associate’s or higher degree.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • This is an adult educational-attainment measure, not a current high-school graduation rate or a measure of school quality.
  • A statewide estimate can obscure differences across communities and demographic groups.
Washington · state comparison

Are students learning?

NAEP state comparisons use public-school students in the same grade and subject. National benchmarks include public and private schools.

Washington · 2024215.7
Washington rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark215Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Grade 4 reading

FactVote uses NAEP Data Service mean scale scores for all public-school students in Washington. The series uses the total student group and the main reading and mathematics composite scales for Grade 4 and Grade 8.

NAEP is generally administered every two years; the 2021 administration was postponed, so the timeline moves from 2019 to 2022. NAEP results are estimates from a sample. Statistical significance, not a visual gap alone, determines whether scores differ. Each grade and subject has its own scale. Follow one line over time rather than comparing the numeric distance between grades or subjects.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Washington
Grade 4 reading history in Washington213.4220.5227.520032024
2024 · Washington: 215.7 · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 215 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Washington Grade 4 reading history
PeriodWashingtonCompare
2003221.1
2005223.5
2007224
2009221.3
2011220.5
2013225
2015225.9
2017223.1
2019219.7
2022216.7
2024215.7

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · 200.6Higher value · 224.8Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · 215.72024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Grade 4 reading · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts224.8—
#2Wyoming221.9—
#3New Jersey221.6—
#4New Hampshire221.5—
#5Colorado220.9—
#6Indiana220.1—
#7Utah219.3—
#8Connecticut219.2—
#9Mississippi218.5—
#10Florida218.2—
#11Kentucky218—
#12Montana217.2—
#13Rhode Island216.3—
#14Louisiana216—
#14Ohio216—
#16Hawaii215.8—
#16Pennsylvania215.8—
#18Idaho215.7—
#18Washington · your comparison215.7—
#20Maryland215.6—
#21North Dakota215.5—
#22Wisconsin215.3—
#23Tennessee215.1—
#24South Carolina214.9—
#25Iowa214.6—
#25New York214.6—
#27Georgia214.4—
#27Minnesota214.4—
#29Illinois214.2—
#30South Dakota214.1—
#30Virginia214.1—
#32North Carolina213.4—
#33Alabama213.2—
#34Kansas213.1—
#34Nevada213.1—
#36Vermont212.7—
#37Missouri211.9—
#37Texas211.9—
#39California211.7—
#39Nebraska211.7—
#41Arkansas209.7—
#42Maine209.6—
#43Delaware209.5—
#44Michigan209.1—
#45Arizona208.1—
#46Oklahoma207.3—
#47Oregon207—
#48West Virginia205.9—
#49Alaska201.6—
#50New Mexico200.6—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Washington · state comparison

Where does school funding go?

Compare spending per pupil and the composition of school revenue and current spending.

Washington · FY2024$18,564
Washington rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$17,619Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current spending per pupil

Public elementary-secondary current spending per enrolled pupil.

Current spending excludes capital spending. More spending is not itself a measure of student outcomes.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · $11.06KHigher value · $31.92KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · $18,564FY2024 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Current spending per pupil · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$31,918—
#2Vermont$28,818—
#3New Jersey$27,234—
#4Connecticut$26,316—
#5Massachusetts$24,429—
#6Hawaii$23,878—
#7New Hampshire$22,978—
#8Delaware$22,201—
#9Rhode Island$22,110—
#10Illinois$21,776—
#11Pennsylvania$21,091—
#12Alaska$21,004—
#13California$20,791—
#14Wyoming$20,521—
#15Maryland$20,208—
#16Maine$19,962—
#17Washington · your comparison$18,564—
#18Michigan$18,314—
#19Oregon$18,083—
#20New Mexico$17,664—
#21Ohio$17,257—
#22Virginia$17,104—
#23North Dakota$17,102—
#24Minnesota$17,098—
#25Nebraska$16,147—
#26Wisconsin$15,952—
#27Colorado$15,908—
#28Georgia$15,833—
#29West Virginia$15,640—
#30Louisiana$15,581—
#31Kansas$15,558—
#32South Carolina$15,060—
#33Nevada$14,812—
#34Kentucky$14,596—
#35Iowa$14,369—
#36Missouri$14,241—
#37Arkansas$13,873—
#38Montana$13,656—
#39Alabama$13,627—
#40Indiana$13,622—
#41North Carolina$12,995—
#42Texas$12,895—
#43Tennessee$12,882—
#44South Dakota$12,828—
#45Florida$12,693—
#46Mississippi$12,324—
#47Oklahoma$12,162—
#48Arizona$12,003—
#49Utah$11,347—
#50Idaho$11,060—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Washington · state comparison

Are students finishing school?

The federal comparison uses a common adjusted cohort and school year. A newer state graduation snapshot, where retained, uses its own source and period; adult attainment is a separate measure.

Washington · 2021–2284%
Washington rank#33among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark87%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Federal public-school cohort graduation rate

Share of the adjusted ninth-grade public-school cohort graduating in four years. From 2017–18, the federal measure counts regular diplomas and eligible state-defined alternate diplomas for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities; earlier years count regular diplomas only.

Published NCES state comparison through 2021–22. Rounded whole percentages produce tied ranks. Missing or suppressed values are excluded. Any newer state graduation snapshot uses its own period and cannot inherit this rank.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Washington
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history in Washington74.4%81.5%88.7%2011–122021–22
2021–22 · Washington: 84% · Rank #33 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 87% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Washington Federal public-school cohort graduation rate history
PeriodWashingtonCompare
2011–1277%
2012–1376%
2013–1478%
2014–1578%
2015–1680%
2016–1779%
2017–1887%
2018–1981%
2019–2083%
2020–21Not available
2021–2284%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · 77%Higher value · 91%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · 84%2021–22 · Rank #33 of 48, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Federal public-school cohort graduation rate · 2021–22 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1West Virginia91%—
#2Iowa90%—
#2Kentucky90%—
#2Massachusetts90%—
#2Missouri90%—
#2Tennessee90%—
#2Texas90%—
#2Wisconsin90%—
#9Connecticut89%—
#9Kansas89%—
#9Mississippi89%—
#9Virginia89%—
#13Alabama88%—
#13Arkansas88%—
#13Delaware88%—
#13Indiana88%—
#13New Hampshire88%—
#13Utah88%—
#19California87%—
#19Florida87%—
#19Illinois87%—
#19Nebraska87%—
#19New York87%—
#19Pennsylvania87%—
#25Hawaii86%—
#25Maine86%—
#25Maryland86%—
#25Montana86%—
#25North Carolina86%—
#25Ohio86%—
#31New Jersey85%—
#31North Dakota85%—
#33Georgia84%—
#33Minnesota84%—
#33South Carolina84%—
#33Washington · your comparison84%—
#37Louisiana83%—
#37Rhode Island83%—
#37Vermont83%—
#40Colorado82%—
#40Nevada82%—
#40South Dakota82%—
#40Wyoming82%—
#44Michigan81%—
#44Oregon81%—
#46Idaho80%—
#47Alaska78%—
#48Arizona77%—
—New MexicoNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—OklahomaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Washington · state comparison

College costs, attendance, and earnings

Published charges describe prices before aid. Costs and outcomes require their own definitions and populations.

Washington · 2022–23$8,006
Washington rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$9,750Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public four-year in-state tuition and fees

Average published annual charges at degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the state.

2022–23 academic year, current dollars. Tuition averages are weighted by undergraduate enrollment; room and board use the NCES reporting universe. Charges exclude aid and do not equal a typical student’s net cost.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Washington stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Washington has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.54KHigher value · $17.6KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Washington · $8,0062022–23 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Washington with every state · 50 ranked
Public four-year in-state tuition and fees · 2022–23 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Vermont$17,600—
#2New Hampshire$17,019—
#3Pennsylvania$16,217—
#4Connecticut$15,763—
#5New Jersey$15,265—
#6Illinois$14,921—
#7Virginia$14,825—
#8Rhode Island$14,744—
#9Michigan$14,718—
#10Massachusetts$14,345—
#11Minnesota$12,873—
#12South Carolina$12,604—
#13Oregon$12,424—
#14Delaware$11,922—
#15Arizona$11,768—
#16Kentucky$11,299—
#17Alabama$11,081—
#18Ohio$10,922—
#19Maine$10,813—
#20Hawaii$10,484—
#21Tennessee$10,437—
#22Iowa$10,121—
#23Maryland$10,041—
#24Missouri$9,926—
#25Indiana$9,886—
#26Louisiana$9,843—
#27Colorado$9,798—
#28North Dakota$9,728—
#29Kansas$9,274—
#30Mississippi$9,120—
#31South Dakota$9,079—
#32Wisconsin$8,974—
#33Arkansas$8,879—
#34Nebraska$8,862—
#35West Virginia$8,715—
#36California$8,637—
#37New York$8,575—
#38Oklahoma$8,519—
#39Alaska$8,291—
#40Texas$8,195—
#41Washington · your comparison$8,006—
#42Idaho$7,640—
#43New Mexico$7,526—
#44North Carolina$7,327—
#45Montana$7,299—
#46Utah$7,215—
#47Georgia$7,075—
#48Nevada$6,723—
#49Wyoming$5,100—
#50Florida$4,540—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment from FactVote’s Washington candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

34 statements from 13 candidates

2026 Washington U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Mary Silva

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · WA

Schools & education

Vocational Training & Reskilling Expand apprenticeships, federal reskilling programs, and trade education as fast-track alternatives to four-year degrees, helping young workers earn high salaries sooner.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Tech Sovereignty, American Jobs & Workforce Development

Candidate campaign source

Vocational Training & Reskilling Expand apprenticeships, federal reskilling programs, and trade education as fast-track alternatives to four-year degrees, helping young workers earn high salaries sooner.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Mary Silva — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Suzan DelBene

5 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · WA

Schools & education

We must also address the endemic gun violence in America so our families and communities are safe. As a mother and grandmother, I am sickened and outraged by the seemingly never-ending incidents of gun violence. While there is no one law or set of laws that will prevent every senseless shooting, we …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public Safety and Police Accountability

Candidate campaign source

We must also address the endemic gun violence in America so our families and communities are safe. As a mother and grandmother, I am sickened and outraged by the seemingly never-ending incidents of gun violence. While there is no one law or set of laws that will prevent every senseless shooting, we must do more to address this tragic cycle of gun violence. I serve on the Congressional Gun Violence Prevention Task Force and remain committed to finding sensible solutions to this problem. I support expanding background checks, banning the sale of semiautomatic assault weapons, and implementing extreme risk protection orders, also known as red flag laws, as the foundation of commonsense gun reforms. I support the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act which will help protect our children, keep our schools safe, and reduce the threat of violence across our country. I am a cosponsor of the Equal Access to Justice for Victims of Gun Violence Act, which would allow victims of gun violence to sue gun manufacturers, dealers, and sellers for negligence, unlawful marketing, and trafficking, removing the industry’s special legal immunity. I support the Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act, legislation that would place limits and safeguards on the online market for ammunition to stop dangerous individuals from easily obtaining ammunition over the internet.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 10 ↗
View 4 more statements from Suzan DelBene
Schools & education

Trump has recklessly tried to shutter the Department of Education. I strongly oppose his illegal attempt to dismantle the department, which would slash federal funding for public schools nationwide, eliminate programs for children with disabilities, and cut programs that make attending college affor…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Trump has recklessly tried to shutter the Department of Education. I strongly oppose his illegal attempt to dismantle the department, which would slash federal funding for public schools nationwide, eliminate programs for children with disabilities, and cut programs that make attending college affordable. Let’s be clear, eliminating the Department of Education would require an act of Congress – and I will fight any effort to do so.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Schools & education

While our economy grew because of Democrats’ economic policies, including the expansion of the Child Tax Credit, under the Trump administration many families are struggling with rising costs including the price of gas, housing, and child care. I’m committed to creating an economy that works for ever…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economic Security and Rising Costs for Families

Candidate campaign source

While our economy grew because of Democrats’ economic policies, including the expansion of the Child Tax Credit, under the Trump administration many families are struggling with rising costs including the price of gas, housing, and child care. I’m committed to creating an economy that works for everyone by helping our small businesses and local industries rebuild so they can support good-paying jobs for years to come, including in the aerospace, manufacturing, high-tech, sustainable agriculture, clean energy, and health care industries. We must support businesses that are creating jobs and invest in the training, education, and skills of our workers to ensure they are prepared for success. This has been a long-term commitment of mine since I secured $200 million to expand job training opportunities during my first term in Congress.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
Schools & education

Throughout my time in Congress, I have fought to protect and strengthen federal investments in homeless assistance and affordable housing programs. That’s why I champion legislation that would help create 2 million affordable homes nationwide over the next decade. This bill would also boost affordab…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing and Homelessness

Candidate campaign source

Throughout my time in Congress, I have fought to protect and strengthen federal investments in homeless assistance and affordable housing programs. That’s why I champion legislation that would help create 2 million affordable homes nationwide over the next decade. This bill would also boost affordable housing access for veterans, seniors, Native American communities, rural communities, survivors of domestic violence and stalking, and low-income students. Ensuring all families have access to safe, affordable housing remains one of my top priorities in Congress.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Schools & education

I am also a cosponsor of the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act, to codify protections for immigrants in sensitive locations such churches, hospitals and schools.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy

Candidate campaign source

I am also a cosponsor of the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act, to codify protections for immigrants in sensitive locations such churches, hospitals and schools.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Suzan DelBene — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗

2026 Washington U.S. House — District 10 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Chris D. Chung

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 10 · WA

Schools & education

My focus is simple: to help ease the burdens families are facing, to improve access to education and healthcare, to ensure that those who have served this community and country are treated with respect and dignity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability, education, health care, and service members

Candidate campaign source

My focus is simple: to help ease the burdens families are facing, to improve access to education and healthcare, to ensure that those who have served this community and country are treated with respect and dignity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Chris D. Chung ↗
View 1 more statement from Chris D. Chung
Schools & education

At the same time, I have heard from many residents who are facing real challenges. The cost of living continues to rise. Housing has become more difficult to afford. Healthcare and education bring growing concerns for many families. And there are those who have served our country and communities who…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

At the same time, I have heard from many residents who are facing real challenges. The cost of living continues to rise. Housing has become more difficult to afford. Healthcare and education bring growing concerns for many families. And there are those who have served our country and communities who feel they are not receiving the full support they deserve.When I hear these concerns,I believe it is important to reflect and consider how things can be improved.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Chris D. Chung ↗

Democratic · U.S. House District 10 · WA

Schools & education

The American people deserve a nation that is safe, just, and secure for all. This means housing and health care they can afford, stable jobs, safe neighborhoods with strong schools, and retiring with dignity. I am proud of my record to protect our civil rights and voting rights, honor tribal treatie…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

The American people deserve a nation that is safe, just, and secure for all. This means housing and health care they can afford, stable jobs, safe neighborhoods with strong schools, and retiring with dignity. I am proud of my record to protect our civil rights and voting rights, honor tribal treaties, and delivering for the people of the South Sound.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — Marilyn Strickland ↗

2026 Washington U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

John Braun

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · WA

Schools & education

Parents—not bureaucrats—have the right to know what's happening in their kids' classrooms. I support the Parents Bill of Rights at the federal level. In Washington, I opposed policies that cut parents out of critical decisions; my opponent voted against the House's parents' rights bill. At the state…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education: Parental Rights & College Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Parents—not bureaucrats—have the right to know what's happening in their kids' classrooms. I support the Parents Bill of Rights at the federal level. In Washington, I opposed policies that cut parents out of critical decisions; my opponent voted against the House's parents' rights bill. At the state level, I authored the College Affordability Program—the largest cuts to public university tuition in the nation. College should be a ladder up, not a debt trap. I'll fight to rein in tuition costs and expand access to skilled-trades training so every young person in Southwest Washington has a path to a good career.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John Braun — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 1 more statement from John Braun
Schools & education

I will also focus on rebuilding American manufacturing, supporting law enforcement and keeping Americans safe, standing with veterans, protecting Social Security and Medicare, and restoring parents’ rights in education.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Manufacturing, public safety, veterans, Social Security, Medicare, and education

Candidate campaign source

I will also focus on rebuilding American manufacturing, supporting law enforcement and keeping Americans safe, standing with veterans, protecting Social Security and Medicare, and restoring parents’ rights in education.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

2026 Washington official voter-guide statement — John Braun ↗

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · WA

Schools & education

Marie knows many good jobs don’t require a 4-year degree. In Congress, she is working to increase access to apprenticeships and technical training and reduce the number of jobs that require applicants to have expensive college degrees. She is also working to allow Pell Grants to apply to job trainin…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Marie knows many good jobs don’t require a 4-year degree. In Congress, she is working to increase access to apprenticeships and technical training and reduce the number of jobs that require applicants to have expensive college degrees. She is also working to allow Pell Grants to apply to job training, not just college degrees.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Marie Gluesenkamp Perez — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific schools, learning, college costs and educational attainment terms in retained, attributed source text from published Washington candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Washington incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Washington legislators and Washington’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Washington’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

35 matching sponsorships or proposals · 25 Washington incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Beth Doglio

Washington House of Representatives, District 22 · D–WA

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Beth Doglio
Washington Legislature · HB 1152

Enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences.

Feb 19, 2026 · Introduced

Rep. Beth Doglio · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences. AN ACT Relating to enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences and by directing the Washington office of firearm safety and violence prevention to provide education regarding firearm secure storage;

The latest official Washington Legislature record shows this action on February 19, 2026: House Rules "X" file..

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences. AN ACT Relating to enhancing public safety by establishing secure storage requirements for firearms in vehicles and residences and by directing the Washington office of firearm safety and violence prevention to provide education regarding firearm secure storage;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Washington Legislature · HB 1779

Concerning the immigration status of students.

Jan 13, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Beth Doglio · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Concerning the immigration status of students. AN ACT Relating to providing for educational equity regardless of immigration or citizenship status;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 13, 2020: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status. It does not establish an effect on Washington's foreign-born population share.

Retained Washington evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Concerning the immigration status of students. AN ACT Relating to providing for educational equity regardless of immigration or citizenship status;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Debra Entenman

Washington House of Representatives, District 47 · D–WA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Debra Entenman
Washington Legislature · HB 1943

Including certain residents who do not have a high school diploma or credential and the number of students expected to enroll in basic education for adults courses at community and technical colleges in caseload forecast council forecasting.

Jan 12, 2022 · Did not pass

Rep. Debra Entenman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Including certain residents who do not have a high school diploma or credential and the number of students expected to enroll in basic education for adults courses at community and technical colleges in caseload forecast council forecasting. AN ACT Relating to including certain residents who do not have a high school diploma or credential and the number of students expected to enroll in basic education for adults courses at community and technical colleges in caseload forecast council forecasting;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 12, 2022: First reading, referred to Appropriations.. The measure did not pass before the 2021-22 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses adult education, high-school completion, diploma requirements, equivalency credentials, or dropout recovery. It does not establish an effect on Washington's adult educational-attainment rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Including certain residents who do not have a high school diploma or credential and the number of students expected to enroll in basic education for adults courses at community and technical colleges in caseload forecast council forecasting. AN ACT Relating to including certain residents who do not have a high school diploma or credential and the number of students expected to enroll in basic education for adults courses at community and technical colleges in caseload forecast council forecasting;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Emily Randall

U.S. representative for Washington, District 6 · D–WA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Emily Randall
U.S. Congress · Washington delegation · H.R.9134

Protecting Student Privacy Act

Jun 3, 2026 · Introduced

Rep. Emily Randall · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to ensure that personally identifiable information provided in the Free Application for Federal Student Aid is not used for immigration enforcement, and for other purposes

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration enforcement, immigrant residents, refugees, asylum, naturalization, or services tied to immigration status. It does not establish an effect on Washington's foreign-born population share.

Retained Washington evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to ensure that personally identifiable information provided in the Free Application for Federal Student Aid is not used for immigration enforcement, and for other purposes
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Gerry Pollet

Washington House of Representatives, District 46 · D–WA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Gerry Pollet
Washington Legislature · HB 1837

Providing contraception vending machines at institutions of higher education.

Jan 8, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Gerry Pollet · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Providing contraception vending machines at institutions of higher education. AN ACT Relating to contraception vending machines at institutions of higher education;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 8, 2024: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2023-24 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion services, reproductive healthcare, or contraception. It does not establish an effect on the number of abortions occurring in Washington.

Retained Washington evidence context: Abortions occurring in Washington. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Providing contraception vending machines at institutions of higher education. AN ACT Relating to contraception vending machines at institutions of higher education;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Greg Nance

Washington House of Representatives, District 23 · D–WA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Greg Nance
Washington Legislature · HB 2110

Reorganizing statutory requirements governing high school graduation.

Mar 13, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 66

Rep. Greg Nance · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Reorganizing statutory requirements governing high school graduation. AN ACT Relating to reorganizing statutory requirements governing high school graduation by reordering requirements, making nonsubstantive revisions, and removing expired provisions;

The official Washington Legislature record shows the measure was enacted by March 13, 2024 as Chapter 66.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses adult education, high-school completion, diploma requirements, equivalency credentials, or dropout recovery. It does not establish an effect on Washington's adult educational-attainment rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Reorganizing statutory requirements governing high school graduation. AN ACT Relating to reorganizing statutory requirements governing high school graduation by reordering requirements, making nonsubstantive revisions, and removing expired provisions;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Jim Walsh

Washington House of Representatives, District 19 · R–WA

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Jim Walsh
Washington Legislature · HB 1038

Allowing public school districts and private schools to adopt a policy authorizing permanent employees to possess firearms on school grounds under certain conditions.

Jan 13, 2020 · Did not pass

Rep. Jim Walsh · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allowing public school districts and private schools to adopt a policy authorizing permanent employees to possess firearms on school grounds under certain conditions. AN ACT Relating to allowing public school districts and private schools to adopt a policy authorizing permanent employees to possess firearms on school grounds under certain conditions;

The official Washington Legislature record lists this final action on January 13, 2020: By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.. The measure did not pass before the 2019-20 biennium ended.

Why this record is included

The official record directly regulates firearms or addresses shootings, firearm safety, trafficking, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Washington's firearm mortality rate.

Retained Washington evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Allowing public school districts and private schools to adopt a policy authorizing permanent employees to possess firearms on school grounds under certain conditions. AN ACT Relating to allowing public school districts and private schools to adopt a policy authorizing permanent employees to possess firearms on school grounds under certain conditions;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Washington officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Washington statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.