Vermont · individual fact

Vermont real gross domestic product

Vermont’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$38.06B2025 · #50 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth1.9%2025 · #26 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$49.66B2025 · #50 of 50 · highest first

Vermont over time

Explore Vermont readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Vermont officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Vermont effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Vermont change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP Vermont · source units
VermontPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $38.06B$0$13.41T$26.81TVermont, 2014: $31.85BVermont, 2015: $32.04BVermont, 2016: $32.31BVermont, 2017: $32.59BVermont, 2018: $32.82BVermont, 2019: $33.33BVermont, 2020: $32.51BVermont, 2021: $34.09BVermont, 2022: $35.55BVermont, 2023: $36.38BVermont, 2024: $37.35BVermont, 2025: $38.06B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 29National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● Vermont Legislature · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.● U.S. Congress · Vermont delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Vermont agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

0 of 0 reviewed Vermont actions match · 0 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.

Vermont · 2025: $38.06B · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Vermont Real GDP · source units
PeriodVermontRankU.S. benchmark
2025$38.06B#50 of 50$23.94T
2024$37.35B#50 of 50$23.39T
2023$36.38B#50 of 50$22.72T
2022$35.55B#50 of 50$22.08T
2021$34.09B#50 of 50$21.56T
2020$32.51B#50 of 50$20.28T
2019$33.33B#50 of 50$20.72T
2018$32.82B#50 of 50$20.19T
2017$32.59B#50 of 50$19.61T
2016$32.31B#50 of 50$19.14T
2015$32.04B#50 of 50$18.8T
2014$31.85B#50 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Vermont · state comparison

Vermont output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

Vermont · 2025$38.06B
Vermont rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Real GDP history in Vermont$-3.55T$11.99T$27.53T20142025
2025 · Vermont: $38.06B · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Real GDP history
PeriodVermontCompare
2014$31.85B
2015$32.04B
2016$32.31B
2017$32.59B
2018$32.82B
2019$33.33B
2020$32.51B
2021$34.09B
2022$35.55B
2023$36.38B
2024$37.35B
2025$38.06B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · $38.06B2025 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont · your comparison$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

What makes up Vermont GDP?

Choose an industry to compare Vermont’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

Vermont · 2025$536.1M
Vermont rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in Vermont$-43.58B$146.93B$337.43B20142025
2025 · Vermont: $536.1M · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodVermontCompare
2014$561.4M
2015$432.6M
2016$398M
2017$421.9M
2018$384.8M
2019$457.9M
2020$384.5M
2021$464.7M
2022$768.8M
2023$504.8M
2024$532.7M
2025$536.1M

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · $536.1M2025 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont · your comparison$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

Vermont · 2025439,349
Vermont rank#50among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Total employment · jobs history in Vermont-32,277,287109,367,315251,011,91620142025
2025 · Vermont: 439,349 · Rank #50 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Total employment · jobs history
PeriodVermontCompare
2014429,205
2015432,741
2016434,044
2017436,197
2018438,101
2019433,977
2020409,929
2021421,975
2022432,329
2023436,519
2024438,465
2025439,349

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · 439,3492025 · Rank #50 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont · your comparison439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Vermont candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

9 statements from 3 candidates

2026 Vermont Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 5 statements

Amanda Janoo

5 statements

Democratic/Progressive · Governor · VT

Economic growth & production context

Coordinate economic development around one shared strategy by creating an Office of Community Wealth Building and Economic Resilience that aligns state investments, strengthens regional partnerships, expands local procurement, builds resilient Vermont supply chains, supports community-led economic d…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Coordinate economic development around one shared strategy by creating an Office of Community Wealth Building and Economic Resilience that aligns state investments, strengthens regional partnerships, expands local procurement, builds resilient Vermont supply chains, supports community-led economic development, and helps create stronger, more self-reliant local economies across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 4 more statements from Amanda Janoo
Economic growth & production context

Protect workers in the age of AI by prohibiting invasive workplace surveillance, protecting collective bargaining over automation, and ensuring productivity gains supported by public investment are shared through higher wages, shorter working hours where appropriate, improved public services, or bro…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, technology, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Protect workers in the age of AI by prohibiting invasive workplace surveillance, protecting collective bargaining over automation, and ensuring productivity gains supported by public investment are shared through higher wages, shorter working hours where appropriate, improved public services, or broader community ownership.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Economic growth & production context

Expand participatory budgeting and community decision-making by giving communities greater direct authority over public spending while supporting locally led planning for housing, economic development, healthcare, and other community priorities.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Democracy, ethics, and the rule of law

Candidate campaign source

Expand participatory budgeting and community decision-making by giving communities greater direct authority over public spending while supporting locally led planning for housing, economic development, healthcare, and other community priorities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Economic growth & production context

Support community-led economic development by helping towns, regions, and local organizations develop economic strategies rooted in their own strengths, assets, and priorities—whether that’s food, forestry, outdoor recreation, the arts, or holistic care—so every region of Vermont can build an econom…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Support community-led economic development by helping towns, regions, and local organizations develop economic strategies rooted in their own strengths, assets, and priorities—whether that’s food, forestry, outdoor recreation, the arts, or holistic care—so every region of Vermont can build an economy that reflects its own people, skills, and resources.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Economic growth & production context

We’ll redirect existing economic development subsidies away from expensive recruitment incentives for large corporations and toward investments that strengthen Vermont businesses, workers, farmers, and communities for the long term. Public financing, partnerships with Vermont credit unions, communit…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

We’ll redirect existing economic development subsidies away from expensive recruitment incentives for large corporations and toward investments that strengthen Vermont businesses, workers, farmers, and communities for the long term. Public financing, partnerships with Vermont credit unions, community lenders, and mission-driven investors, together with returns from community-owned investments, will help multiply these dollars while keeping capital rooted in Vermont.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Vermont State Treasurer — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Mike Pieciak

2 statements

Democratic · State Treasurer · VT

Economic growth & production context

BUILDING OUR FINANCIAL FUTURE For decades the rich have accumulated more and more wealth while working and middle-class Americans have been left to struggle with less. That’s why our leaders need to provide bold solutions that address the roots economic inequality and poverty. That starts with birth…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Building Our Financial Future

Candidate campaign source

BUILDING OUR FINANCIAL FUTURE For decades the rich have accumulated more and more wealth while working and middle-class Americans have been left to struggle with less. That’s why our leaders need to provide bold solutions that address the roots economic inequality and poverty. That starts with birth, and ends with a secure and dignified retirement. Baby Bonds In 2023, I announced Baby Bonds, an innovative policy to fight intergenerational poverty, promote economic development, and keep young people in Vermont. Through this program, the state will invest $3,200 for every child born on Medicaid. This money would grow in a professionally managed fund, and participants could access those funds between the age of 18 and 30, and use the money to buy a home, attain an education, or start a business.In 2025, the legislature passed a pilot of the Baby Bonds program, which will serve 450 babies born in Caledonia, Essex, and Orleans counties between 2027 and 2030. Pension ProtectionIt is absolutely crucial we support our teachers, state employees, and public sector workers. This means fully funding the state’s pension system and driving down unfunded liabilities.After I was appointed to the Vermont Pension Task Force by the Legislature, I spent months working alongside lawmakers and union representatives to forge a compromise that strengthens Vermont’s pension system and reduces its unfunded liabilities by $2 billion. Passed unanimously by both the House and Senate, this proposal is now law.As Treasurer, I have continued to advocate for public sector workers. I’ve also built the public’s trust in our state pension system and its investments by creating accountability and transparency in the Treasurer’s Office. Vermont SavesIn 2022, my office established Vermont Saves, a retirement savings plan for Vermonters who are not currently offered a retirement plan through their employer. It’s designed to make saving for retirement easy and automatic, at no cost to employers and no ongoing cost to taxpayers.In its first year, Vermont Saves helped over 5,200 Vermonters begin building retirement security, with over $4.5 million collectively saved and participation from nearly 1,300 employers statewide. In my third term, I will continue to grow Vermont Saves to ensure a every Vermonter can age in place and retire with the dignity they’re owed.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Mike Pieciak — campaign source ↗
View 1 more statement from Mike Pieciak
Economic growth & production context

In 2023, I announced Baby Bonds, an innovative policy to fight intergenerational poverty, promote economic development, and keep young people in Vermont.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Building Our Financial Future

Candidate campaign source

In 2023, I announced Baby Bonds, an innovative policy to fight intergenerational poverty, promote economic development, and keep young people in Vermont.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Mike Pieciak — campaign source ↗

2026 Vermont U.S. House — At Large — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Gerald Malloy

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House — At Large · VT

Economic growth & production context

Unlike the current approach in Congress, I believe economic growth comes from empowering people—not expanding bureaucracy.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

Unlike the current approach in Congress, I believe economic growth comes from empowering people—not expanding bureaucracy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Gerald Malloy campaign source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Gerald Malloy
Economic growth & production context

While Becca Balint has supported policies that expand federal control and spending, I will focus on practical solutions, economic growth, and restoring balance in Washington.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Candidate statement

Candidate campaign source

While Becca Balint has supported policies that expand federal control and spending, I will focus on practical solutions, economic growth, and restoring balance in Washington.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Gerald Malloy campaign source 3 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Vermont candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Vermont incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Vermont legislators and Vermont’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Vermont’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

0 matching sponsorships or proposals · 0 Vermont incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

No retained proposals match these filters. A missing record does not mean an incumbent has taken no action.

What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Vermont officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Vermont statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.