Vermont · individual fact

Vermont income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Vermont’s tax structure.

Median household income$81.2K2020–2024 · #19 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$46.5K2020–2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$58.89K2024 · #21 of 50 · highest first

Vermont over time

Explore Vermont readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Vermont officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Vermont effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Vermont change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Vermont · source units
VermontPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $58,893$46.26K$53.51K$60.77KVermont, 2014: $49,364Vermont, 2015: $49,521Vermont, 2016: $50,686Vermont, 2017: $49,958Vermont, 2018: $50,654Vermont, 2019: $52,744Vermont, 2020: $54,552Vermont, 2021: $56,938Vermont, 2022: $54,437Vermont, 2023: $58,061Vermont, 2024: $58,893201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 35National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings funding● Vermont Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Vermont delegation · 1◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Vermont agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-07-31

2 of 2 reviewed Vermont actions match · 2 date markers shown. 35 major events shown separately.

Vermont · 2024: $58,893 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Vermont Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodVermontRankU.S. benchmark
2024$58,893#21 of 50$59,195
2023$58,061#21 of 50$58,088
2022$54,437#33 of 50$57,104
2021$56,938#27 of 50$59,365
2020$54,552#27 of 50$56,514
2019$52,744#21 of 50$53,683
2018$50,654#25 of 50$52,242
2017$49,958#24 of 50$51,006
2016$50,686#22 of 50$49,828
2015$49,521#24 of 50$49,396
2014$49,364#21 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Vermont · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Vermont · 2020–2024$81,203
Vermont rank#19among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · $81,2032020–2024 · Rank #19 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $79,864 – $82,542Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont · your comparison$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$81,2032020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Vermont households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Vermont · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Vermont · 2024$58,893
Vermont rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Real personal income per person history in Vermont$45.91K$53.51K$61.12K20142024
2024 · Vermont: $58,893 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Real personal income per person history
PeriodVermontCompare
2014$49,364
2015$49,521
2016$50,686
2017$49,958
2018$50,654
2019$52,744
2020$54,552
2021$56,938
2022$54,437
2023$58,061
2024$58,893

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · $58,8932024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont · your comparison$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

How Vermont raises taxes

Vermont uses four marginal personal-income-tax rates: 3.35%, 6.6%, 7.6%, and 8.75%; taxable-income brackets are adjusted annually. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Vermont · FY2024$1.24B
Vermont rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · $1.24BFY2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont · your comparison$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Vermont income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Vermont ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Vermont candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

26 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Vermont Governor — General Election

4 candidates with matching statements · 17 statements

Amanda Janoo

13 statements

Democratic/Progressive · Governor · VT

Income & wages

Protect workers in the age of AI by prohibiting invasive workplace surveillance, protecting collective bargaining over automation, and ensuring productivity gains supported by public investment are shared through higher wages, shorter working hours where appropriate, improved public services, or bro…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, technology, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Protect workers in the age of AI by prohibiting invasive workplace surveillance, protecting collective bargaining over automation, and ensuring productivity gains supported by public investment are shared through higher wages, shorter working hours where appropriate, improved public services, or broader community ownership.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 12 more statements from Amanda Janoo
Taxes & tax policy

Lay the foundation for universal healthcare by creating the nation’s first publicly funded universal primary care system—improving health, lowering overall healthcare costs, rebuilding community-based care, and creating the infrastructure needed to expand toward comprehensive universal healthcare ov…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Lay the foundation for universal healthcare by creating the nation’s first publicly funded universal primary care system—improving health, lowering overall healthcare costs, rebuilding community-based care, and creating the infrastructure needed to expand toward comprehensive universal healthcare over time by exploring partnerships with neighboring states as a way to achieve this in the years to come. This plan will be funded through our Fair Share Tax Proposal, which asks the wealthiest Vermonters to contribute the equivalent cuts from the Big Beautiful Bill. Those who have benefited most from decades of rising wealth and tax cuts should help ensure every Vermonter can access the healthcare they need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

By investing in permanently affordable housing, helping Vermonters build and own homes, and asking large corporate investors, private equity, luxury second homes, and commercial vacation rentals to contribute their fair share, we can lower housing costs, reduce property taxes, and put more homes bac…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

By investing in permanently affordable housing, helping Vermonters build and own homes, and asking large corporate investors, private equity, luxury second homes, and commercial vacation rentals to contribute their fair share, we can lower housing costs, reduce property taxes, and put more homes back in the hands of the people and communities they were meant to serve.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Partner with other states to coordinate AI governance, privacy protections, cybersecurity, taxation of dominant technology companies, public procurement standards, antitrust advocacy, open-source development, and enforcement so states can act together rather than individually against corporations wh…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, technology, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Partner with other states to coordinate AI governance, privacy protections, cybersecurity, taxation of dominant technology companies, public procurement standards, antitrust advocacy, open-source development, and enforcement so states can act together rather than individually against corporations whose power increasingly rivals that of governments.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Reward businesses that create public value by aligning grants, financing, tax incentives, and procurement preferences with outcomes that benefit Vermonters—including local ownership, living wages, apprenticeship programs, environmental stewardship, worker participation, Vermont sourcing, and long-te…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Reward businesses that create public value by aligning grants, financing, tax incentives, and procurement preferences with outcomes that benefit Vermonters—including local ownership, living wages, apprenticeship programs, environmental stewardship, worker participation, Vermont sourcing, and long-term investment in our communities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Together, we can put homes back in the hands of Vermonters by investing in permanently affordable housing, rebuilding our capacity to build and renovate homes locally, reducing property taxes, and ensuring more homes are owned by the people and communities they were meant to serve.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

Together, we can put homes back in the hands of Vermonters by investing in permanently affordable housing, rebuilding our capacity to build and renovate homes locally, reducing property taxes, and ensuring more homes are owned by the people and communities they were meant to serve.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Taxes on digital advertising, data monetization, dominant online marketplaces, and AI infrastructure will serve two purposes: they will help discourage business models that extract wealth, data, and economic activity from Vermont communities while generating revenue to invest in the digital infrastr…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, technology, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Taxes on digital advertising, data monetization, dominant online marketplaces, and AI infrastructure will serve two purposes: they will help discourage business models that extract wealth, data, and economic activity from Vermont communities while generating revenue to invest in the digital infrastructure and public institutions that strengthen our democracy. Those revenues will be reinvested in community broadband, cybersecurity, local journalism, open-source technologies, public-interest innovation, and programs that help Vermont businesses compete and encourage Vermonters to buy local whenever possible.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

We can build a Vermont where homes are owned by people, neighborhoods still know their neighbors, and every community has the opportunity to thrive. By making it easier for Vermonters to rent, buy, build, and remain in their homes, we’ll lower housing costs and property taxes, help young families pu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

We can build a Vermont where homes are owned by people, neighborhoods still know their neighbors, and every community has the opportunity to thrive. By making it easier for Vermonters to rent, buy, build, and remain in their homes, we’ll lower housing costs and property taxes, help young families put down roots, enable older Vermonters to age with dignity in their communities, reduce homelessness, and create good-paying jobs in the skilled trades.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Revenue from taxes on private equity, large corporate housing, second homes, vacation rentals and luxury estates will be reinvested to reduce property taxes for Vermont residents and expand permanently affordable housing. We’ll also leverage state and federal housing programs, revolving loan funds, …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

Revenue from taxes on private equity, large corporate housing, second homes, vacation rentals and luxury estates will be reinvested to reduce property taxes for Vermont residents and expand permanently affordable housing. We’ll also leverage state and federal housing programs, revolving loan funds, municipal partnerships, and mission-driven investment to help communities create housing that remains affordable for generations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Expand local ownership by helping retiring business owners transition to employees, cooperatives, family members, or local buyers instead of out-of-state corporations, while supporting worker-owned cooperatives, employee-owned businesses, community-owned enterprises, and Public Benefit Corporations …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Expand local ownership by helping retiring business owners transition to employees, cooperatives, family members, or local buyers instead of out-of-state corporations, while supporting worker-owned cooperatives, employee-owned businesses, community-owned enterprises, and Public Benefit Corporations through financing, technical assistance, and targeted tax incentives for businesses that create long-term public value.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Level the playing field for Vermont businesses by redesigning state procurement, financing, regulations, technical assistance, and tax policy around the needs of small businesses rather than large corporations—making it easier for local businesses to compete, collaborate, innovate, and grow while ke…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Level the playing field for Vermont businesses by redesigning state procurement, financing, regulations, technical assistance, and tax policy around the needs of small businesses rather than large corporations—making it easier for local businesses to compete, collaborate, innovate, and grow while keeping ownership and wealth rooted in Vermont.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Ensure Big Tech pays its fair share by placing taxes on large digital advertising platforms, data monetization, dominant online marketplaces, and AI infrastructure—both to discourage business models that extract wealth, data, and economic activity from Vermont communities and to level the playing fi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, technology, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Ensure Big Tech pays its fair share by placing taxes on large digital advertising platforms, data monetization, dominant online marketplaces, and AI infrastructure—both to discourage business models that extract wealth, data, and economic activity from Vermont communities and to level the playing field for local businesses. Revenue generated will be reinvested in community broadband, local journalism, public-interest technology and programs that help Vermonters buy local, support Vermont businesses, and keep more of our economy rooted here at home.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Modernize Vermont’s property tax and housing classification system by recognizing the different roles housing plays in our communities. Primary homes, workforce housing, permanently affordable housing, small Vermont landlords, and modest family camps would receive greater protections, while luxury s…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

Modernize Vermont’s property tax and housing classification system by recognizing the different roles housing plays in our communities. Primary homes, workforce housing, permanently affordable housing, small Vermont landlords, and modest family camps would receive greater protections, while luxury second homes, commercial vacation rentals, vacant investment properties, and large corporate or private-equity ownership would contribute more. We’ll also close ownership loopholes that allow large investors to hide behind multiple LLCs, ensuring our tax system rewards homes that strengthen Vermont communities—not big investors and rich out of staters.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

June Goodband

2 statements

Peace and Justice · Governor · VT

Taxes & tax policy

Use Progressive taxation instead of homestead taxes to pay for education. Increase taxes on high incomes and buildings that could be used for housing but are left vacant for most of the year. Separate state tax from federal tax. Set a standard deductible for state taxes that is in line with what it …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Use Progressive taxation instead of homestead taxes to pay for education. Increase taxes on high incomes and buildings that could be used for housing but are left vacant for most of the year. Separate state tax from federal tax. Set a standard deductible for state taxes that is in line with what it costs to live here.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

June Goodband — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 1 more statement from June Goodband
Income & wages

High costs and low incomes are pushing people to the brink. It’s time to require profitable businesses to pay a living wage so their workers don’t need state assistance.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

High costs and low incomes are pushing people to the brink. It’s time to require profitable businesses to pay a living wage so their workers don’t need state assistance.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

June Goodband — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Phil Scott

1 statement

Republican · Governor · VT

Income & wages

“I’ve made this decision because I believe too many families and employers are on the economic edge. For them to thrive and our state to prosper we must revitalize the fundamentals of a strong, healthy economy that expands the middle class, lifts wages, and attracts working families, entrepreneurs a…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: for Statewide Solutions

Candidate campaign source

“I’ve made this decision because I believe too many families and employers are on the economic edge. For them to thrive and our state to prosper we must revitalize the fundamentals of a strong, healthy economy that expands the middle class, lifts wages, and attracts working families, entrepreneurs and new jobs… It is time for Vermont to move forward, beginning with a change in the Governor’s office…I will be a steady hand at the helm, provide balanced leadership that values listening, stand up for working families and confront our crisis of affordability in meaningful ways. Practical leadership that is in touch with the needs of everyday families and small businesses will rebuild faith and trust in government and move Vermont forward in very positive ways.”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Phil Scott — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Vermont Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

John S. Rodgers

1 statement

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · VT

Taxes & tax policy

Too many Vermonters are being squeezed by rising property taxes, higher energy costs, increasing health insurance premiums, and the growing cost of everyday life. John is committed to fighting for lower costs by opposing unnecessary taxes, mandates, and government spending that place additional burd…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Too many Vermonters are being squeezed by rising property taxes, higher energy costs, increasing health insurance premiums, and the growing cost of everyday life. John is committed to fighting for lower costs by opposing unnecessary taxes, mandates, and government spending that place additional burdens on Vermont families, seniors, farmers, and small businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John S. Rodgers — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Molly Gray

3 statements

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · VT

Taxes & tax policy

Molly also recognizes that Vermont’s shrinking school-age population requires thoughtful reforms that support cooperation and, where appropriate, consolidation between communities. But she believes closing schools and consolidating districts alone will not truly stabilize property taxes or address t…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Molly also recognizes that Vermont’s shrinking school-age population requires thoughtful reforms that support cooperation and, where appropriate, consolidation between communities. But she believes closing schools and consolidating districts alone will not truly stabilize property taxes or address the underlying financial pressures facing public education.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Molly Gray
Taxes & tax policy

Support individuals and businesses in making a clean energy transition towards electric vehicles and heat pumps, and away from reliance on costly foreign oil and fossil fuels, by retaining Vermont-based tax credits and incentives despite federal cutbacks.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Support individuals and businesses in making a clean energy transition towards electric vehicles and heat pumps, and away from reliance on costly foreign oil and fossil fuels, by retaining Vermont-based tax credits and incentives despite federal cutbacks.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

One of the biggest drivers of rising education costs is healthcare. Health insurance premiums for public school employees have increased by double digits in recent years, significantly raising school budgets and Vermonters’ property tax bills. Molly believes Vermont must confront these rising health…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

One of the biggest drivers of rising education costs is healthcare. Health insurance premiums for public school employees have increased by double digits in recent years, significantly raising school budgets and Vermonters’ property tax bills. Molly believes Vermont must confront these rising healthcare costs while protecting strong local schools and educational opportunities for students across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Vermont State Treasurer — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Mike Pieciak

2 statements

Democratic · State Treasurer · VT

Income & wages

BUILDING OUR FINANCIAL FUTURE For decades the rich have accumulated more and more wealth while working and middle-class Americans have been left to struggle with less. That’s why our leaders need to provide bold solutions that address the roots economic inequality and poverty. That starts with birth…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Building Our Financial Future

Candidate campaign source

BUILDING OUR FINANCIAL FUTURE For decades the rich have accumulated more and more wealth while working and middle-class Americans have been left to struggle with less. That’s why our leaders need to provide bold solutions that address the roots economic inequality and poverty. That starts with birth, and ends with a secure and dignified retirement. Baby Bonds In 2023, I announced Baby Bonds, an innovative policy to fight intergenerational poverty, promote economic development, and keep young people in Vermont. Through this program, the state will invest $3,200 for every child born on Medicaid. This money would grow in a professionally managed fund, and participants could access those funds between the age of 18 and 30, and use the money to buy a home, attain an education, or start a business.In 2025, the legislature passed a pilot of the Baby Bonds program, which will serve 450 babies born in Caledonia, Essex, and Orleans counties between 2027 and 2030. Pension ProtectionIt is absolutely crucial we support our teachers, state employees, and public sector workers. This means fully funding the state’s pension system and driving down unfunded liabilities.After I was appointed to the Vermont Pension Task Force by the Legislature, I spent months working alongside lawmakers and union representatives to forge a compromise that strengthens Vermont’s pension system and reduces its unfunded liabilities by $2 billion. Passed unanimously by both the House and Senate, this proposal is now law.As Treasurer, I have continued to advocate for public sector workers. I’ve also built the public’s trust in our state pension system and its investments by creating accountability and transparency in the Treasurer’s Office. Vermont SavesIn 2022, my office established Vermont Saves, a retirement savings plan for Vermonters who are not currently offered a retirement plan through their employer. It’s designed to make saving for retirement easy and automatic, at no cost to employers and no ongoing cost to taxpayers.In its first year, Vermont Saves helped over 5,200 Vermonters begin building retirement security, with over $4.5 million collectively saved and participation from nearly 1,300 employers statewide. In my third term, I will continue to grow Vermont Saves to ensure a every Vermonter can age in place and retire with the dignity they’re owed.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Mike Pieciak — campaign source ↗
View 1 more statement from Mike Pieciak
Income & wages

In 2023, I announced Baby Bonds, an innovative policy to fight intergenerational poverty, promote economic development, and keep young people in Vermont.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Building Our Financial Future

Candidate campaign source

In 2023, I announced Baby Bonds, an innovative policy to fight intergenerational poverty, promote economic development, and keep young people in Vermont.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Mike Pieciak — campaign source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Vermont candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Vermont incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Vermont legislators and Vermont’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Vermont’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Vermont incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Larry Satcowitz

Vermont House of Representatives · D–VT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Larry Satcowitz
Vermont Legislature · H.743

An act relating to increasing the State minimum wage based on the livable wage

Jan 22, 2026 · Not enacted · Referred to committee

Rep. Larry Satcowitz · Sponsored / Rep. Brian Cina · Co-sponsored / Rep. Zon Eastes · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mary E. Howard · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kate Logan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kate McCann · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jubilee McGill · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kristi Morris · Co-sponsored / Rep. Gayle Pezzo · Co-sponsored / Rep. Phil Pouech · Co-sponsored / Rep. Edward "Teddy" Waszazak · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.743 proposes an $18.60 minimum wage starting January 1, 2027, followed by annual increases capped at the smaller of 5% or the specified inflation measure. The official record lists referral to House General and Housing on January 22, 2026, with no enactment. Neither the proposed July 1, 2026 effective date nor the January wage date makes the bill law.

Read first time and referred to the Committee on General and Housing. No enactment in the checked 2025–2026 record as of September 11, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and salaries contribute to household money income. The proposal concerns pay for covered workers, not every source of household income, and it does not establish a change in median household income. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Vermont evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(a)(1) Beginning on January 1, 2027, an employer shall not employ any employee at a rate of less than the livable wage of $18.60. On each subsequent January 1, the minimum wage rate shall be increased by five percent or the percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index, CPI-U, U.S. city average, not seasonally adjusted, or successor index, as calculated by the U.S. Department of Labor or successor agency, rounded to one decimal point, for the 12 months preceding the previous September 1, whichever is smaller, but in no event shall the minimum wage be decreased.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Vermont officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Vermont statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.