Vermont · individual fact

Vermont prices and inflation

Compare Vermont’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Vermont CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level982024 · #22 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level97.32024 · #20 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level86.52024 · #25 of 50 · highest first

Vermont over time

Explore Vermont readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Vermont officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Vermont effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Vermont change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Vermont · source units
VermontPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 9896.199.6103.1Vermont, 2014: 97.9Vermont, 2015: 100Vermont, 2016: 98.2Vermont, 2017: 100.3Vermont, 2018: 100.2Vermont, 2019: 99.6Vermont, 2020: 102.1Vermont, 2021: 98.7Vermont, 2022: 101Vermont, 2023: 97.1Vermont, 2024: 98201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Vermont Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · Vermont delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 1■ Vermont agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-05-31

3 of 3 reviewed Vermont actions match · 3 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

Vermont · 2024: 98 · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Vermont with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Vermont All-items price level · source units
PeriodVermontRankU.S. benchmark
202498#22 of 50100
202397.1#23 of 50100
2022101#17 of 50100
202198.7#17 of 50100
2020102.1#12 of 50100
201999.6#16 of 50100
2018100.2#17 of 50100
2017100.3#16 of 50100
201698.2#19 of 50100
2015100#16 of 50100
201497.9#22 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Vermont · state comparison

How does Vermont’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Vermont · 202498
Vermont rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Vermont with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
All-items price level history in Vermont96.499.6102.920142024
2024 · Vermont: 98 · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont All-items price level history
PeriodVermontCompare
201497.9
2015100
201698.2
2017100.3
2018100.2
201999.6
2020102.1
202198.7
2022101
202397.1
202498

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · 982024 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont · your comparison98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Vermont · 20243.5%
Vermont rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Vermont-2.3%4.1%10.5%20152024
2024 · Vermont: 3.5% · Rank #15 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodVermontCompare
20152.3%
2016-0.8%
20173.9%
20181.9%
20190.8%
20203.7%
20210.6%
20229.1%
2023-0.2%
20243.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · 3.5%2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont · your comparison3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Vermont · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Vermont · 2024$58,893
Vermont rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Vermont
Real personal income per person history in Vermont$45.91K$53.51K$61.12K20142024
2024 · Vermont: $58,893 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Vermont Real personal income per person history
PeriodVermontCompare
2014$49,364
2015$49,521
2016$50,686
2017$49,958
2018$50,654
2019$52,744
2020$54,552
2021$56,938
2022$54,437
2023$58,061
2024$58,893

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Vermont stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Vermont has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Vermont · $58,8932024 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Vermont with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont · your comparison$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Vermont candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

5 statements from 3 candidates

2026 Vermont Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Amanda Janoo

3 statements

Democratic/Progressive · Governor · VT

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

By investing in permanently affordable housing, helping Vermonters build and own homes, and asking large corporate investors, private equity, luxury second homes, and commercial vacation rentals to contribute their fair share, we can lower housing costs, reduce property taxes, and put more homes bac…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

By investing in permanently affordable housing, helping Vermonters build and own homes, and asking large corporate investors, private equity, luxury second homes, and commercial vacation rentals to contribute their fair share, we can lower housing costs, reduce property taxes, and put more homes back in the hands of the people and communities they were meant to serve.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 2 more statements from Amanda Janoo
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

We can build a Vermont where homes are owned by people, neighborhoods still know their neighbors, and every community has the opportunity to thrive. By making it easier for Vermonters to rent, buy, build, and remain in their homes, we’ll lower housing costs and property taxes, help young families pu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

We can build a Vermont where homes are owned by people, neighborhoods still know their neighbors, and every community has the opportunity to thrive. By making it easier for Vermonters to rent, buy, build, and remain in their homes, we’ll lower housing costs and property taxes, help young families put down roots, enable older Vermonters to age with dignity in their communities, reduce homelessness, and create good-paying jobs in the skilled trades.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

By investing in local builders, technical education, Vermont-made building materials, adaptive reuse, and community ownership, we’ll keep more construction dollars circulating in Vermont’s economy while reducing long-term housing costs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing

Candidate campaign source

By investing in local builders, technical education, Vermont-made building materials, adaptive reuse, and community ownership, we’ll keep more construction dollars circulating in Vermont’s economy while reducing long-term housing costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Amanda Janoo — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Vermont Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

John S. Rodgers

1 statement

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · VT

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Too many Vermonters are being squeezed by rising property taxes, higher energy costs, increasing health insurance premiums, and the growing cost of everyday life. John is committed to fighting for lower costs by opposing unnecessary taxes, mandates, and government spending that place additional burd…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Too many Vermonters are being squeezed by rising property taxes, higher energy costs, increasing health insurance premiums, and the growing cost of everyday life. John is committed to fighting for lower costs by opposing unnecessary taxes, mandates, and government spending that place additional burdens on Vermont families, seniors, farmers, and small businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John S. Rodgers — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Molly Gray

1 statement

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · VT

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Support renters and residents of mobile homes and condos in accessing plug-in balcony solar units, expanding opportunities for all Vermonters to participate in our clean energy transition, and alleviating high energy costs. Balcony solar kits are estimated to save Vermonters up to 10% to 25% on a mo…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

Support renters and residents of mobile homes and condos in accessing plug-in balcony solar units, expanding opportunities for all Vermonters to participate in our clean energy transition, and alleviating high energy costs. Balcony solar kits are estimated to save Vermonters up to 10% to 25% on a monthly household electricity bill!

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Molly Gray — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Vermont candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Vermont incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Vermont legislators and Vermont’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Vermont’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Vermont incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Larry Satcowitz

Vermont House of Representatives · D–VT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Larry Satcowitz
Vermont Legislature · H.743

An act relating to increasing the State minimum wage based on the livable wage

Jan 22, 2026 · Not enacted · Referred to committee

Rep. Larry Satcowitz · Sponsored / Rep. Brian Cina · Co-sponsored / Rep. Zon Eastes · Co-sponsored / Rep. Mary E. Howard · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kate Logan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kate McCann · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jubilee McGill · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kristi Morris · Co-sponsored / Rep. Gayle Pezzo · Co-sponsored / Rep. Phil Pouech · Co-sponsored / Rep. Edward "Teddy" Waszazak · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

H.743 proposes an $18.60 minimum wage starting January 1, 2027, followed by annual increases capped at the smaller of 5% or the specified inflation measure. The official record lists referral to House General and Housing on January 22, 2026, with no enactment. Neither the proposed July 1, 2026 effective date nor the January wage date makes the bill law.

Read first time and referred to the Committee on General and Housing. No enactment in the checked 2025–2026 record as of September 11, 2026. Printed effective dates do not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Wages and salaries contribute to household money income. The proposal concerns pay for covered workers, not every source of household income, and it does not establish a change in median household income. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Vermont evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(a)(1) Beginning on January 1, 2027, an employer shall not employ any employee at a rate of less than the livable wage of $18.60. On each subsequent January 1, the minimum wage rate shall be increased by five percent or the percentage increase of the Consumer Price Index, CPI-U, U.S. city average, not seasonally adjusted, or successor index, as calculated by the U.S. Department of Labor or successor agency, rounded to one decimal point, for the 12 months preceding the previous September 1, whichever is smaller, but in no event shall the minimum wage be decreased.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Laura Sibilia

Vermont House of Representatives · I–VT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Laura Sibilia
Vermont Legislature · H.727

An act relating to sustainable data center deployment

May 29, 2026 · Vetoed · Veto sustained

Rep. Laura Sibilia · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The final version of H.727 passed by both chambers would require Public Utility Commission approval of electricity contracts for covered data centers using or able to use at least 20 megawatts. It would apply to centers not operational on the act’s effective date and existing centers below 20 megawatts that expand to meet the threshold. Contracts would allocate service costs to the center and insulate other ratepayer classes from deployment costs, including new infrastructure, capacity and resource adequacy costs. The governor vetoed the bill, and the House sustained the veto on May 29, 2026. These proposed protections were not enacted.

Veto of the Governor sustained by a vote of Yeas = 83, Nays = 52. Not enacted.

Why this record is included

The electricity fact measures the average retail price across all customer sectors. Allocating data-center infrastructure and energy costs concerns the utility-rate component of that price. The vetoed proposal establishes no actual rate change or savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Vermont evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1) “Data center” means a facility that uses or is able to use 20 megawatts or more of power and is engaged in providing data processing, hosting, and related services as described under code 518210 of the 2022 North American Industry Classification System. […] § 284. LARGE LOAD SERVICE EQUITY CONTRACT; APPROVAL (a) For the purpose of ensuring just and reasonable rates for all ratepayer classes and precluding the risk of financial exposure to electric companies and their existing ratepayers, a data center shall be served by an electric company pursuant to a large load service equity contract approved by the Public Utility Commission. (b) The large load service equity contract shall: (1) include a method for allocating costs that is equal or proportional to the costs of providing electric service to the data center, including providing for equitable contributions to the embedded costs and the stability, efficiency, reliability, and resiliency of the electricity network; (2) ensure that other ratepayer classes are insulated from all costs associated with data center deployment, including expenses for new generation, transmission, and distribution infrastructure, as well as energy capacity and resource adequacy costs; […] Sec. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION This act shall take effect on passage and shall apply to any data center not operational on the effective date of this act as well as to any data center that uses less than 20 MW of power that is operational on the effective date of this act to the extent such data center seeks to expand its capacity and meet the threshold requirements of Sec. 1, 30 V.S.A. § 283(1).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Vermont officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Vermont statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.