Utah · individual fact

Utah unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate3.3%2024 · #32 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents1,766,4892024 · #30 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer1.1%2025 · 11-month average · #37 of 50 · highest first

Utah over time

Explore Utah readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Utah officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Utah effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Utah change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Utah · source units
UtahPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 3.3%1.4%3.6%5.8%Utah, 2015: 3.5%Utah, 2016: 3.3%Utah, 2017: 3.1%Utah, 2018: 2.9%Utah, 2019: 2.5%Utah, 2020: 4.8%Utah, 2021: 2.8%Utah, 2022: 2.4%Utah, 2023: 2.7%Utah, 2024: 3.3%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 15National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Utah Legislature · 7● U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · 3◆ Governor · 4■ Utah agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2015-12-012026-09-30

14 of 14 reviewed Utah actions match · 14 date markers shown. 15 major events shown separately.

Utah · 2024: 3.3% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Utah Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodUtahRankU.S. benchmark
20243.3%#32 of 504%
20232.7%#40 of 50Not available
20222.4%#44 of 50Not available
20212.8%#48 of 50Not available
20204.8%#48 of 50Not available
20192.5%#47 of 50Not available
20182.9%#42 of 50Not available
20173.1%#42 of 50Not available
20163.3%#43 of 50Not available
20153.5%#44 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Utah · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Utah · 20243.3%
Utah rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Utah
Annual unemployment rate history in Utah2%3.6%5.2%20152024
2024 · Utah: 3.3% · Rank #32 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Utah Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodUtahCompare
20153.5%
20163.3%
20173.1%
20182.9%
20192.5%
20204.8%
20212.8%
20222.4%
20232.7%
20243.3%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Utah stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · 3.3%2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah · your comparison3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Utah · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Utah · 2025 · 11-month average1.1%
Utah rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Utah stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · 1.1%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah · your comparison1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Utah · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Utah · 20252.7%
Utah rank#13among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Utah
Annual real GDP growth history in Utah-3.7%3.3%10.3%20152025
2025 · Utah: 2.7% · Rank #13 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Utah Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodUtahCompare
20153.6%
20164.6%
20175.9%
20185.8%
20195.8%
20201%
20218.7%
20223.6%
20232.8%
20245%
20252.7%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Utah stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · 2.7%2025 · Rank #13 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah · your comparison2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Utah · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Utah · December 202564,000
Utah rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Utah
Openings · number history in Utah-1,001,9003,617,0008,235,900July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Utah: 64,000 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Utah Openings · number history
PeriodUtahCompare
July 202574,000
August 202573,000
September 202579,000
October 202573,000
November 202565,000
December 202564,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Utah stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · 64,000December 2025 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah · your comparison64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Utah candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

10 statements from 7 candidates

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

4 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Ben McAdams

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · UT

Jobs & workforce context

Immigrants and New Americans: Immigrants are not a problem to be managed; they are part of the American story. Utah is stronger because of immigrants who build businesses, serve in our communities, and enrich our culture. I believe in an immigration system rooted in dignity, fairness, and opportunit…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy

Candidate campaign source

Immigrants and New Americans: Immigrants are not a problem to be managed; they are part of the American story. Utah is stronger because of immigrants who build businesses, serve in our communities, and enrich our culture. I believe in an immigration system rooted in dignity, fairness, and opportunity; not fear, cruelty, or political scapegoating.As Mayor of Salt Lake County, I created the Office for New Americans to ensure immigrants and refugees had access to language services, workforce training, and pathways to civic participation. I also launched the United for Citizenship Initiative to help thousands of eligible permanent residents become U.S. citizens because democracy works best when everyone can fully participate.In Congress, I voted to provide a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers and supported comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for law-abiding immigrants who contribute to our communities. I opposed family separation and efforts to demonize asylum seekers. We must protect TPS recipients, safeguard due process, and ensure that no child grows up in fear of losing their parents to unjust deportation.I support permanently protecting Dreamers, expanding access to legal status, defending asylum protections, and ending policies that criminalize families seeking safety. Immigration reform must center human rights, keep families together, and create a clear, achievable pathway to citizenship.Utah can lead with compassion and courage. We can build a system that is humane, just, and worthy of the values we claim to stand for.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ben McAdams — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
View 1 more statement from Ben McAdams
Jobs & workforce context

Sustainable Energy: Utah can lead in clean, affordable American-made energy that strengthens our economy and lowers costs for families. I support expanding clean energy, modernizing the electrical grid, and investing in transportation infrastructure that creates jobs and secures our energy future.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, public lands, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Sustainable Energy: Utah can lead in clean, affordable American-made energy that strengthens our economy and lowers costs for families. I support expanding clean energy, modernizing the electrical grid, and investing in transportation infrastructure that creates jobs and secures our energy future.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ben McAdams — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗

Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 1 · UT

Jobs & workforce context

Secure Equal Marketplace Access: Enforce steady, predictable non-discrimination baselines to protect citizens from arbitrary eviction or job loss based on identity.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Constitutional government, civil rights, and individual freedom

Candidate campaign source

Secure Equal Marketplace Access: Enforce steady, predictable non-discrimination baselines to protect citizens from arbitrary eviction or job loss based on identity.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Elias Henry Montgomery — candidate-owned primary source ↗

Jesse West

1 statement

Libertarian · U.S. House District 1 · UT

Jobs & workforce context

When veterans come home, we owe them real support — healthcare, mental health services, housing, and job training. Too many servicemembers return to bureaucratic nightmares and broken promises. That's unacceptable.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

When veterans come home, we owe them real support — healthcare, mental health services, housing, and job training. Too many servicemembers return to bureaucratic nightmares and broken promises. That's unacceptable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jesse West — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Riley Owen

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · UT

Jobs & workforce context

Riley will build apprenticeship partnerships between Utah colleges and advanced manufacturers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Riley will build apprenticeship partnerships between Utah colleges and advanced manufacturers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Riley Owen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Peter Crosby

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · UT

Jobs & workforce context

Close these tax loopholes, so that if AI deployment significantly displaces Americans and their families from the workforce, we have the resources necessary to support them while they transition.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity

Candidate campaign source

Close these tax loopholes, so that if AI deployment significantly displaces Americans and their families from the workforce, we have the resources necessary to support them while they transition.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Peter Crosby — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Peter Crosby
Jobs & workforce context

Reform and invest in higher education to provide more direct pathways to well-paying jobs while reducing the time and cost of applicable credentials

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Reform and invest in higher education to provide more direct pathways to well-paying jobs while reducing the time and cost of applicable credentials

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Peter Crosby — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Hill Air Force Base (HAFB) is the single largest economic employer in Northern Utah, and maintaining a positive relationship with the leadership is an integral part of the responsibilities of our Congressional representative. The best way to support this relationship is to pursue and maintain a posi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, public lands, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Hill Air Force Base (HAFB) is the single largest economic employer in Northern Utah, and maintaining a positive relationship with the leadership is an integral part of the responsibilities of our Congressional representative. The best way to support this relationship is to pursue and maintain a position on the House Armed Services Committee, ensure the restoration of the Great Salt Lake, and spend time with not just the officers, but the enlisted personnel and contractors that form the bulk of the workforce supporting the mission of HAFB, and driving the economic investment in the communities of Northern Utah.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Peter Crosby — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Adonis Hooslyn

1 statement

Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 3 · UT

Jobs & workforce context

Protect and create jobs while regulating AI development. Ensure technology serves humanity, not just corporate bottom lines.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Technology and cybersecurity

Candidate campaign source

Protect and create jobs while regulating AI development. Ensure technology serves humanity, not just corporate bottom lines.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 20, 2026

Adonis Hooslyn — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Ayden Scott

1 statement

Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 3 · UT

Jobs & workforce context

Small businesses are the engine of Utah's economy. I'll work to reduce the federal burden on small employers and oppose any new mandates that make it harder to hire, grow, or stay open. When we increase production and create more jobs here in Utah, we strengthen our communities and our economy from …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Small businesses are the engine of Utah's economy. I'll work to reduce the federal burden on small employers and oppose any new mandates that make it harder to hire, grow, or stay open. When we increase production and create more jobs here in Utah, we strengthen our communities and our economy from the ground up. The federal government should be clearing the path for entrepreneurs — not standing in it.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ayden Scott — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Utah candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Utah incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Utah legislators and Utah’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Utah’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

10 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 Utah incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Burgess Owens

U.S. House of Representatives, Utah District 4 · R–UT

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Burgess Owens
U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · HR 8347

RURAL Healthcare Act

Jul 21, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Burgess Owens · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Classifies qualifying temporary locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors under federal wage-and-hour and labor-relations law, subject to the bill’s contract and duration conditions.

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 18 - 15.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Classification of qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors under Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and National Labor Relations Act (a)In generalFor the purposes of the following Federal laws, an individual who is a qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner shall not be considered an employee of the entity on behalf of which the individual furnishes physician or advanced care practitioner services on a temporary basis, whether or not provided as a substitute for another provider: (1)The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). (2)The National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). (b)Qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner definedIn this section, the term qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner means an individual who— (1)provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services, including for workforce coverage, scheduling flexibility, or episodic staffing needs— (A)for a period of not more than one continuous year at a single site of service; and (B)pursuant to a written contract providing that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services; and (2)is— (A)a physician, as defined in— (i)section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)); or (ii)section 8101(2) of title 5, United States Code; or (B)a nurse practitioner, physician’s assistant, or certified registered nurse anesthetist.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · HR 8272

To classify qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors for the purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the National Labor Relations Act.

Apr 14, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Burgess Owens · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Classifies qualifying temporary locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors under federal wage-and-hour and labor-relations law, subject to the bill’s contract and duration conditions.

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

1.Classification of qualified locum tenens professionals and advanced care practitioners as independent contractors under Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and National Labor Relations Act (a)In generalFor the purposes of the following Federal laws, an individual who is a qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner shall not be considered an employee of the entity on behalf of which the individual furnishes physician or advanced care practitioner services on a temporary basis, whether or not provided as a substitute for another provider: (1)The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). (2)The National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.). (b)Qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner definedIn this section, the term qualified locum tenens professional or advanced care practitioner means an individual who— (1)provides temporary physician or advanced care practitioner services, including for workforce coverage, scheduling flexibility, or episodic staffing needs— (A)for a period of not more than one continuous year at a single site of service; and (B)pursuant to a written contract providing that the individual will not be treated as an employee with respect to such services; and (2)is— (A)a physician, as defined in— (i)section 1861(r) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)); or (ii)section 8101(2) of title 5, United States Code; or (B)a nurse practitioner, physician’s assistant, or certified registered nurse anesthetist.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Trevor Lee

Utah House of Representatives, District 16 · R–UT

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Trevor Lee
Utah Legislature · HB 170

Unemployment Insurance Amendments

Mar 13, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Trevor Lee · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Identifies certain conduct that may disqualify an individual from receiving unemployment benefits; requires the Unemployment Insurance Division within the Department of Workforce Services to make rules governing certain disqualifications for unemployment benefits.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

identifies certain conduct that may disqualify an individual from receiving unemployment benefits; requires the Unemployment Insurance Division within the Department of Workforce Services to make rules governing certain disqualifications for unemployment benefits;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Utah Legislature · HB 283

Unemployment Insurance Amendments

Mar 3, 2023 · Did not pass

Rep. Trevor Lee · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Identifies certain conduct that may disqualify an individual from receiving unemployment benefits; requires the Unemployment Insurance Division to make rules governing ineligibility for unemployment benefits as a result of a failure to accept suitable work.

House/ filed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

identifies certain conduct that may disqualify an individual from receiving unemployment benefits; requires the Unemployment Insurance Division to make rules governing ineligibility for unemployment benefits as a result of a failure to accept suitable work;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Walt Brooks

Utah House of Representatives, District 75 · R–UT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Walt Brooks
Utah Legislature · HB 8

State Agency and Higher Education Compensation Appropriations

Mar 25, 2025 · Enacted

Rep. Walt Brooks · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Provides funding for a 2.5% labor market increase for state agency employees and discretionary pay increases equal to 2.5% for elected official, judiciary, and higher education employees; provides funding for a 1% one-time pay for performance increase for state employees and discretionary bonuses equal to 1% one-time for employees of elected officials and the judiciary.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

provides funding for a 2.5% labor market increase for state agency employees and discretionary pay increases equal to 2.5% for elected official, judiciary, and higher education employees; provides funding for a 1% one-time pay for performance increase for state employees and discretionary bonuses equal to 1% one-time for employees of elected officials and the judiciary;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Don L. Ipson

Utah Senate, District 29 · R–UT

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Don L. Ipson
Utah Legislature · SB 8

State Agency and Higher Education Compensation Appropriations

Mar 20, 2024 · Enacted

Sen. Don L. Ipson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Provides funding for a 3% labor market increase for state employees and higher education employees; provides funding for pay for performance labor market increases for state employees; provides funding for a 5% discretionary increase for offices of the Legislature, statewide elected officials, and the Judiciary; provides funding for a 0.7% salary enhancement for state employees participating in the Utah Retirement Systems Tier II retirement plan.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

provides funding for a 3% labor market increase for state employees and higher education employees; provides funding for pay for performance labor market increases for state employees; provides funding for a 5% discretionary increase for offices of the Legislature, statewide elected officials, and the Judiciary; provides funding for a 0.7% salary enhancement for state employees participating in the Utah Retirement Systems Tier II retirement plan;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Utah Legislature · SB 8

State Agency and Higher Education Compensation Appropriations

Mar 24, 2022 · Enacted

Sen. Don L. Ipson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Provides funding for a 3.5% labor market increase for state employees; provides funding for performance-based discretionary, targeted, and directed salary increases for state employees; provides funding for a 5.75% labor market and performance-based increase for higher education employees; provides funding for step and lane increases for employees of the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

provides funding for a 3.5% labor market increase for state employees; provides funding for performance-based discretionary, targeted, and directed salary increases for state employees; provides funding for a 5.75% labor market and performance-based increase for higher education employees; provides funding for step and lane increases for employees of the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Mike Lee

U.S. Senate, Utah · R–UT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Mike Lee
U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · S 3648

Immediate Access for the Terminally Ill Act

Jan 15, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Mike Lee · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows qualifying terminally ill SSDI applicants to elect earlier disability benefits in exchange for a seven-percent monthly reduction. It also addresses overlapping unemployment benefits and Social Security overpayment recovery.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Why this record is included

The fact counts Social Security retirement, survivors, and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Benefit administration concerns a component of that population; SSI, Medicare, and state pensions are separate programs. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: People receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Option for disabled individuals with incurable terminal illnesses listed on the compassionate allowance list to receive disability insurance benefits without a waiting period(a)In generalSection 223 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423) is amended—(1)in subsection (a)(1), in the matter following subparagraph (E)—(A)by inserting and who files an application for disability insurance benefits during the period that begins on December 22, 2020, and ends on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of the Immediate Access for the Terminally Ill Act after amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; and(B)by striking , or (iii) and inserting , (iii) in the case of an individual who makes an election under subsection (k), for each month beginning with the first month during all of which the individual is under a disability and in which the individual becomes entitled to such insurance benefits, or (iv); and(2)by adding at the end the following new subsection:(k)Option for disabled individuals with terminal illnesses To receive disability insurance benefits without a waiting period(1)In generalAn individual who is entitled to a disability insurance benefit and has been diagnosed with a medical condition or disease that is included in the most recent list published by the Commissioner of Social Security under paragraph (2) may elect to receive such benefit beginning with the first month during all of which the individual is under a disability and in which the individual becomes entitled to such benefit.(2)Publication of listNot later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this subsection, and every 5 years thereafter, the Commissioner of Social Security shall, through a formal rulemaking process in accordance with sections 556 and 557 of title 5, United States Code, publish a list of medical conditions and diseases—(A)which are included in the most recent list of Compassionate Allowance Conditions published by the Social Security Administration;(B)for which the average life expectancy for all individuals diagnosed with such condition or disease does not exceed 5 years from the date of diagnosis; and(C)for which there is no known cure.(3)Reduction in benefit amountIf an individual described in paragraph (1) elects to receive a disability insurance benefit beginning with the first month during all of which the individual is under a disability and in which the individual becomes entitled to such benefit, the amount of such benefit for any month shall be equal to 93 percent of the amount otherwise determined for the individual under subsection (a)(2) (after the application of sections 202(q) and 215(b)(2)(A)(ii)).(4)Timing and effect of electionAn individual may only make an election under this subsection at the time the individual files an application for a disability insurance benefit under subsection (b), and any election under this subsection shall be irrevocable..(b)Conforming amendmentsSection 223(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423(a)(2)) is amended—(1)by striking section 202(q) and and inserting subsection (k)(3), section 202(q), and; and(2)in subparagraph (B), by striking clause (ii) of paragraph (1) and inserting clause (ii), (iii), or (iv) of the matter following subparagraph (E) of paragraph (1).(c)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to applications for disability insurance benefits filed on or after the date that is 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.3.Congressional approval required for additions to compassionate allowance conditions listSection 223(k) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423(k)) (as added by section 2 of this Act), is amended by adding at the end the following:(5)Congressional approval required for additions to compassionate allowance conditions listBeginning on the date of enactment of this subsection, no disease or medical condition may be added to the list of Compassionate Allowance Conditions published by the Social Security Administration unless there is enacted into law a bill or joint resolution approving such addition..4.Prohibition on payment of social security disability benefits based on receipt of unemployment compensation(a)In generalTitle II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 224 the following new section:224A.Prohibition on payment of benefits based on receipt of unemployment compensation(a)If for any month prior to the month in which an individual attains retirement age (as defined in section 216(l)(1))—(1)such individual is entitled to benefits under section 223, and(2)such individual is entitled for such month to unemployment compensation,the total of the individual's benefits under section 223 for such month and of any benefits under subsections (b) through (h) of section 202 for such month based on the individual's wages and self-employment income shall be reduced to zero.(b)(1)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the head of any Federal agency shall provide such information within its possession as the Commissioner may require for purposes of making a timely determination under this section for reduction of benefits payable under this title, or verifying other information necessary in carrying out the provisions of this section.(2)The Commissioner is authorized to enter into agreements with States, political subdivisions, and other organizations that administer unemployment compensation, in order to obtain such information as the Commissioner may require to carry out the provisions of this section.(3)Any determination by the Commissioner pursuant to this section shall be subject to the requirements described in section 205(b)(1), including provision of reasonable notice and opportunity for a hearing.(c)For purposes of this section, the term unemployment compensation has the meaning given that term in section 85(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986..5.Increasing the overpayment collection threshold for old-age, survivors, and disability insurance benefits(a)In generalSection 204(a)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 404(a)(1)(A)) is amended—(1)by striking With respect to and ‘inserting (i) Subject to clause (ii), with respect to; and(2)by adding at the end the following new clause:(ii)For purposes of clause (i), if the Commissioner of Social Security determines that decreasing a payment under this title to an individual by 100 percent would defeat the purpose of this title, the Commissioner may decrease such payment by a smaller amount, provided that such smaller amount is not less than 10 percent of the amount of such payment..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Ronald M. Winterton

Utah Senate, District 20 · R–UT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Ronald M. Winterton
Utah Legislature · SB 31

Refugee Services Amendments

Mar 26, 2025 · Enacted

Sen. Ronald M. Winterton · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Creates the Refugee Services Office (office) within the Department of Workforce Services.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

creates the Refugee Services Office (office) within the Department of Workforce Services;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Utah officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Utah statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 6, 2026.