Utah · individual fact

Utah prices and inflation

Compare Utah’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide Utah CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level98.92024 · #20 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level96.42024 · #25 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level107.82024 · #14 of 50 · highest first

Utah over time

Explore Utah readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Utah officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Utah effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Utah change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level Utah · source units
UtahPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 98.993.597.2101Utah, 2014: 97.9Utah, 2015: 97.6Utah, 2016: 97.1Utah, 2017: 98.7Utah, 2018: 96Utah, 2019: 97.2Utah, 2020: 95.3Utah, 2021: 94.5Utah, 2022: 94.6Utah, 2023: 95.7Utah, 2024: 98.9201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● Utah Legislature · 4● U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · 3◆ Governor · 1■ Utah agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-04-30

8 of 8 reviewed Utah actions match · 8 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

Utah · 2024: 98.9 · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Utah with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Utah All-items price level · source units
PeriodUtahRankU.S. benchmark
202498.9#20 of 50100
202395.7#26 of 50100
202294.6#26 of 50100
202194.5#26 of 50100
202095.3#25 of 50100
201997.2#24 of 50100
201896#25 of 50100
201798.7#20 of 50100
201697.1#26 of 50100
201597.6#24 of 50100
201497.9#22 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Utah · state comparison

How does Utah’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

Utah · 202498.9
Utah rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare Utah with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Utah
All-items price level history in Utah93.797.2100.820142024
2024 · Utah: 98.9 · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Utah All-items price level history
PeriodUtahCompare
201497.9
201597.6
201697.1
201798.7
201896
201997.2
202095.3
202194.5
202294.6
202395.7
202498.9

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Utah stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · 98.92024 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah · your comparison98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Utah · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Utah · 20246%
Utah rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Utah
Annual change in regional price deflator history in Utah-2.1%2.9%7.8%20152024
2024 · Utah: 6% · Rank #3 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Utah Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodUtahCompare
2015-0.1%
20160.4%
20173.5%
2018-0.7%
20192.7%
2020-0.9%
20213.3%
20226.7%
20235%
20246%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Utah stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · 6%2024 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah · your comparison6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Utah · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

Utah · 2024$55,116
Utah rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Utah
Real personal income per person history in Utah$36.64K$49.48K$62.33K20142024
2024 · Utah: $55,116 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Utah Real personal income per person history
PeriodUtahCompare
2014$39,603
2015$42,051
2016$43,368
2017$43,690
2018$46,494
2019$47,937
2020$52,058
2021$56,766
2022$55,399
2023$55,999
2024$55,116

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Utah stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Utah has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Utah · $55,1162024 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Utah with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah · your comparison$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s Utah candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

15 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Ben McAdams

3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · UT

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Health Care: Nobody should have to choose between paying the rent and seeing a doctor. I’ll fight to lower health care costs by protecting coverage, reducing prescription drug prices, and standing up to policies that put insurance company profits ahead of patients.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Health Care: Nobody should have to choose between paying the rent and seeing a doctor. I’ll fight to lower health care costs by protecting coverage, reducing prescription drug prices, and standing up to policies that put insurance company profits ahead of patients.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ben McAdams — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 2 more statements from Ben McAdams
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

I’ll go to work every day thinking about how to lower housing costs, get you the medical care you deserve and make life a little bit easier for Utah families.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

I’ll go to work every day thinking about how to lower housing costs, get you the medical care you deserve and make life a little bit easier for Utah families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ben McAdams — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Ben is running for Congress on a platform focused on lowering housing costs, expanding access to affordable health care, and making everyday life more affordable for Utah families. The reality is that Washington has become disconnected from working people. Ben is committed to fighting for pragmatic …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Ben is running for Congress on a platform focused on lowering housing costs, expanding access to affordable health care, and making everyday life more affordable for Utah families. The reality is that Washington has become disconnected from working people. Ben is committed to fighting for pragmatic solutions that deliver results, regardless of party. Ben will protect civil liberties, due process, and democratic institutions while restoring cooperation and accountability in government. Ben’s got a proven record of delivering on policies that support families, safeguard freedoms, and rebuild trust in public service.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ben McAdams — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 1 · UT

CPI / inflation mention

Address Economic Stressors First: Lower the cost of living by executing our primary Policy Agenda—stabilizing housing supply, prioritizing local buyers, and stopping reckless spending to halt the inflation eating away family savings.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Address Economic Stressors First: Lower the cost of living by executing our primary Policy Agenda—stabilizing housing supply, prioritizing local buyers, and stopping reckless spending to halt the inflation eating away family savings.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Elias Henry Montgomery — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 1 more statement from Elias Henry Montgomery
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Deregulate and Unshackle Personal Labor: Shift marketplace rules away from the regulatory penalty of direct taxation on personal work. Decentralize tax collection away from direct income tax so that lower income individuals and families are more capable to provide cost-of-living expenses. Rather tha…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Deregulate and Unshackle Personal Labor: Shift marketplace rules away from the regulatory penalty of direct taxation on personal work. Decentralize tax collection away from direct income tax so that lower income individuals and families are more capable to provide cost-of-living expenses. Rather than routing local wealth through a bloated government spending bureau, this model keeps capital in the private economy where it acts as a permanent, non-inflationary buffer for everyday citizens.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Elias Henry Montgomery — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

4 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Ayden Scott

1 statement

Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 3 · UT

CPI / inflation mention

Inflation is a tax on working families, and it's caused by government overspending and artificial restrictions on American production. I will oppose reckless federal spending and push for a balanced budget — but the fastest way to bring prices down is to increase supply. When we unleash American ene…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, public lands, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Inflation is a tax on working families, and it's caused by government overspending and artificial restrictions on American production. I will oppose reckless federal spending and push for a balanced budget — but the fastest way to bring prices down is to increase supply. When we unleash American energy production, reduce barriers for manufacturers, and get out of the way of farmers and small producers, we create more of everything — and more supply means lower prices across the board for every Utah family. The federal government didn't build this economy, the American worker did. My job in Congress is to make sure Washington stops making their job harder.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Ayden Scott — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Celeste Maloy

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · UT

CPI / inflation mention

Stopping Out of Control Spending and Inflation

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Fighting For You, Fighting For Utah

Candidate campaign source

Stopping Out of Control Spending and Inflation

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Celeste Maloy — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Celeste Maloy
CPI / inflation mention

Congresswoman Maloy is working to lower costs and make life more affordable. She knows what it means to work for a paycheck and make ends meet. It has been one of her top priorities to slow inflation and make sure your paycheck stretches as far as possible.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Congresswoman Maloy is working to lower costs and make life more affordable. She knows what it means to work for a paycheck and make ends meet. It has been one of her top priorities to slow inflation and make sure your paycheck stretches as far as possible.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Celeste Maloy — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Kent S. Udell

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · UT

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

While many of us who have owned homes for decades are not negatively affected by rising housing costs, our younger generation finds that home ownership is not affordable without high wages. I support initiatives that focus on building starter homes in communities with access to family-friendly resou…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

While many of us who have owned homes for decades are not negatively affected by rising housing costs, our younger generation finds that home ownership is not affordable without high wages. I support initiatives that focus on building starter homes in communities with access to family-friendly resources such as good schools, parks and churches.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kent S. Udell — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Libertarian · U.S. House District 3 · UT

CPI / inflation mention

Inflation is a hidden tax no one voted for — the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value since the Federal Reserve was created in 1913. I'll work to end the federal monopoly on money and repeal the legal-tender coercion that forces Americans to save in a currency designed to lose value.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Inflation is a hidden tax no one voted for — the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value since the Federal Reserve was created in 1913. I'll work to end the federal monopoly on money and repeal the legal-tender coercion that forces Americans to save in a currency designed to lose value.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael R. Stoddard — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 1 more statement from Michael R. Stoddard
CPI / inflation mention

Washington debases the dollar, then taxes the inflation it manufactured as if it were profit — and since 1982 it has taxed your “gains” before returning a dime of your own principal. These are two takings, and one principle ends them both: tax profit, never debasement. I'll work to index savings and…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Washington debases the dollar, then taxes the inflation it manufactured as if it were profit — and since 1982 it has taxed your “gains” before returning a dime of your own principal. These are two takings, and one principle ends them both: tax profit, never debasement. I'll work to index savings and investment to the dollar's decline, count the saver's own money first, and give every family a simple after-tax account with no warden at the door.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael R. Stoddard — candidate-owned primary source ↗

2026 Utah U.S. House — District 4 — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Jonny Larsen

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · UT

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Homeownership builds community. You get to know your neighbors. That is a Utah value worth fighting for. I will fight to stop corporations from buying single family homes as investments, protect first-time buyers, and bring housing costs down so the next generation gets their share of the American d…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Homeownership builds community. You get to know your neighbors. That is a Utah value worth fighting for. I will fight to stop corporations from buying single family homes as investments, protect first-time buyers, and bring housing costs down so the next generation gets their share of the American dream.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jonny Larsen — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

Mike Kennedy

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 4 · UT

CPI / inflation mention

Mike has pushed back on spending policies that drive inflation and increase costs because decisions made in Washington affect families here in Utah. He will continue working to lower costs and make life more affordable.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Mike has pushed back on spending policies that drive inflation and increase costs because decisions made in Washington affect families here in Utah. He will continue working to lower costs and make life more affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mike Kennedy — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Mike Kennedy
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Energy policy directly impacts jobs, cost of living, and national security. Mike supports an all-of-the-above approach that puts American energy first and protects Utah’s ability to produce.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Energy policy directly impacts jobs, cost of living, and national security. Mike supports an all-of-the-above approach that puts American energy first and protects Utah’s ability to produce.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Mike Kennedy — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Steven Burt

1 statement

Unaffiliated · U.S. House District 4 · UT

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Make the cost of living and stagnant incomes the campaign's highest priority.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability

Candidate campaign source

Make the cost of living and stagnant incomes the campaign's highest priority.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Steven Burt — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published Utah candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Utah incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Utah legislators and Utah’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Utah’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

7 matching sponsorships or proposals · 6 Utah incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Calvin Roberts

Utah House of Representatives, District 46 · R–UT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Calvin Roberts
Utah Legislature · HB 575

Fuel Tax and Supply Amendments

Mar 23, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. Calvin Roberts · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Enacts provisions related to permitting and right-of-way coordination for certain oil and gas infrastructure; reduces the rate of the motor fuel tax; requires refineries to report to the Office of Energy Development regarding production; provides guidelines regarding information and data reported by refineries to the Office of Energy Development.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Rocky Mountain regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming. Utah policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Utah statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

enacts provisions related to permitting and right-of-way coordination for certain oil and gas infrastructure; reduces the rate of the motor fuel tax; requires refineries to report to the Office of Energy Development regarding production; provides guidelines regarding information and data reported by refineries to the Office of Energy Development;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Celeste Maloy

U.S. House of Representatives, Utah District 2 · R–UT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Celeste Maloy
U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · HR 8204

Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2026

Apr 6, 2026 · In Congress

Rep. Celeste Maloy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Directs creation of a western refined-fuel reserve with a minimum gasoline capacity of five million barrels and emergency drawdown authority. Utah is one of the eligible western states.

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Rocky Mountain regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming. Utah policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Utah statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

164.Western Refined Fuel Storage Reserve (a)DefinitionsIn this section: (1)Refined Fuel Storage ReserveThe term Refined Fuel Storage Reserve means a storage facility that— (A)is a salt cavern formation; and (B)is capable of storing refined petroleum products. (2)Refined petroleum productThe term refined petroleum product means gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel. (3)Western StateThe term Western State means the States of Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington. (b)Establishment (1)In generalNot later than 6 months after the date of enactment of the Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2026, the Secretary shall establish a Refined Fuel Storage Reserve for the storage of refined petroleum products as part of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, pursuant to— (A)the authority of the Secretary under section 159(f) to address energy supply and transportation vulnerabilities in Western States, in accordance with Executive Order 14156 (90 Fed. Reg. 8433; relating to declaring a national energy emergency); and (B)this Act. (2)Requirements (A)Identification and selectionIn carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall— (i)identify existing or potential storage locations in Western States suitable to establish a Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, taking into account— (I)the proximity of existing distribution systems; (II)areas of the United States— (aa)most dependent on imported petroleum products; and (bb)areas of the United States most likely to experience shortages of refined petroleum products; (III)the capability for expeditious distribution of refined petroleum products from the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve to areas of the United States described in subclause (II); and (IV)the cost of establishing the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve— (aa)in the applicable Western State; and (bb)at the applicable storage location; and (ii)select 1 storage location. (B)Existing locationsIn carrying out subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable— (i)identify locations suitable for the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve in Western States; and (ii)enter into a contractual arrangement with a public or private entity for the use and operation of a public or private storage location. (c)Fill and maintenance (1)RequirementsDuring the 5 fiscal years following the date of establishment of the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary shall, in accordance with paragraph (2), fill and maintain the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve at not less than 75 percent of the minimum capacity for each refined petroleum product on an adjusted annual basis using— (A)amounts appropriated by Congress for acquisition, by purchase, of petroleum products for storage in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve; and (B)revenues from emergency or test sales carried out pursuant to section 161. (2)Minimum capacityThe minimum capacity of the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve is— (A)5,000,000 barrels of gasoline; (B)3,000,000 barrels of diesel; and (C)2,000,000 barrels of jet fuel. (d)DrawdownThe Secretary may withdraw refined petroleum products stored in the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve to respond to emergencies, supply disruptions, or any other circumstances consistent with the intent of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve or the needs of Western States. (e)State and local government storageThe Secretary shall, as the Secretary determines appropriate, pursue agreements with applicable Western State governments and local governments for storage of non-Federal petroleum products within the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve. (f)ReportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2026, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the establishment and operations of the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, which shall include— (1)an evaluation of— (A)the mechanisms used to carry out the requirements of this section; and (B)other potential mechanisms that could be used in the future to carry out the requirements of this section; (2)the process for purchase or leasing of storage facilities required for the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, as applicable; and (3)recommendations for future storage of refined petroleum products in the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, including any administrative actions and legislation necessary to implement the recommendations, as the Secretary determines appropriate..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Stephen L. Whyte

Utah House of Representatives, District 63 · R–UT

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Stephen L. Whyte
Utah Legislature · HB 465

Housing Affordability Revisions

Mar 19, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. Stephen L. Whyte · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Modifies the requirements for a moderate income housing report; authorizes redevelopment agencies and community development agencies to use funding to pay for or contribute to the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of income targeted housing, under certain circumstances; describes the minimum requirements of a pass-through funding agreement, including requirements that state funds be spent on certain affordable housing investments; modifies the Utah low-income housing tax credit.

Governor Signed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Utah’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

modifies the requirements for a moderate income housing report; authorizes redevelopment agencies and community development agencies to use funding to pay for or contribute to the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of income targeted housing, under certain circumstances; describes the minimum requirements of a pass-through funding agreement, including requirements that state funds be spent on certain affordable housing investments; modifies the Utah low-income housing tax credit;
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Utah Legislature · HB 364

Housing Affordability Amendments

Mar 13, 2023 · Enacted

Rep. Stephen L. Whyte · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Modifies provisions related to the moderate income housing reporting requirements for certain cities and counties; allows for state low-income housing tax credits to be allocated, by pass-through, to certain business entities; increases the aggregate annual amount of state low-income housing tax credits that may be allocated in certain years; allows a taxpayer to claim a state low-income housing tax credit before final certification from the Utah Housing Corporation in certain circumstances.

House/ to Governor. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Utah’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

modifies provisions related to the moderate income housing reporting requirements for certain cities and counties; allows for state low-income housing tax credits to be allocated, by pass-through, to certain business entities; increases the aggregate annual amount of state low-income housing tax credits that may be allocated in certain years; allows a taxpayer to claim a state low-income housing tax credit before final certification from the Utah Housing Corporation in certain circumstances;
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Emily Buss

Utah Senate, District 11 · F–UT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Emily Buss
Utah Legislature · SB 247

Road Funding Amendments

Mar 6, 2026 · Did not pass

Sen. Emily Buss · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Amends the minimum average rack price of motor fuel for purposes of calculating fuel tax rates.

Senate/ filed. The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Rocky Mountain regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming. Utah policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Utah statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

amends the minimum average rack price of motor fuel for purposes of calculating fuel tax rates.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. John R. Curtis

U.S. Senate, Utah · R–UT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. John R. Curtis
U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · S 3407

Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2025

Dec 9, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. John R. Curtis · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Directs creation of a western refined-fuel reserve with a minimum gasoline capacity of five million barrels and emergency drawdown authority. Utah is one of the eligible western states.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Rocky Mountain regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming. Utah policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Utah statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

164.Western Refined Fuel Storage Reserve(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Refined Fuel Storage ReserveThe term Refined Fuel Storage Reserve means a storage facility that—(A)is a salt cavern formation; and(B)is capable of storing refined petroleum products.(2)Refined petroleum productThe term refined petroleum product means gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel.(3)Western StateThe term Western State means the States of Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington.(b)Establishment(1)In generalNot later than 6 months after the date of enactment of the Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2025, the Secretary shall establish a Refined Fuel Storage Reserve for the storage of refined petroleum products as part of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, pursuant to—(A)the authority of the Secretary under section 159(f) to address energy supply and transportation vulnerabilities in Western States, in accordance with Executive Order 14156 (90 Fed. Reg. 8433; relating to declaring a national energy emergency); and(B)this Act.(2)Requirements(A)Identification and selectionIn carrying out paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—(i)identify existing or potential storage locations in Western States suitable to establish a Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, taking into account—(I)the proximity of existing distribution systems;(II)areas of the United States—(aa)most dependent on imported petroleum products; and(bb)areas of the United States most likely to experience shortages of refined petroleum products;(III)the capability for expeditious distribution of refined petroleum products from the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve to areas of the United States described in subclause (II); and(IV)the cost of establishing the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve—(aa)in the applicable Western State; and(bb)at the applicable storage location; and(ii)select 1 storage location.(B)Existing locationsIn carrying out subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable—(i)identify locations suitable for the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve in Western States; and(ii)enter into a contractual arrangement with a public or private entity for the use and operation of a public or private storage location.(c)Fill and maintenance(1)RequirementsDuring the 5 fiscal years following the date of establishment of the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary shall, in accordance with paragraph (2), fill and maintain the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve at not less than 75 percent of the minimum capacity for each refined petroleum product on an adjusted annual basis using—(A)amounts appropriated by Congress for acquisition, by purchase, of petroleum products for storage in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve; and(B)revenues from emergency or test sales carried out pursuant to section 161.(2)Minimum capacityThe minimum capacity of the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve is—(A)5,000,000 barrels of gasoline;(B)3,000,000 barrels of diesel; and(C)2,000,000 barrels of jet fuel.(d)DrawdownThe Secretary may withdraw refined petroleum products stored in the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve to respond to emergencies, supply disruptions, or any other circumstances consistent with the intent of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve or the needs of Western States.(e)State and local government storageThe Secretary shall, as the Secretary determines appropriate, pursue agreements with applicable Western State governments and local governments for storage of non-Federal petroleum products within the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve.(f)ReportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Western Refined Fuel Reserve Act of 2025, and annually thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the establishment and operations of the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, which shall include—(1)an evaluation of—(A)the mechanisms used to carry out the requirements of this section; and(B)other potential mechanisms that could be used in the future to carry out the requirements of this section;(2)the process for purchase or leasing of storage facilities required for the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, as applicable; and(3)recommendations for future storage of refined petroleum products in the Refined Fuel Storage Reserve, including any administrative actions and legislation necessary to implement the recommendations, as the Secretary determines appropriate..
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Mike Lee

U.S. Senate, Utah · R–UT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Mike Lee
U.S. Congress · Utah delegation · S 1721

Energy Freedom Act

May 13, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Mike Lee · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Repeals the federal petroleum tax provisions in the specified Internal Revenue Code subchapter. This concerns a petroleum-cost component and does not determine regional gasoline prices.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Why this record is included

The fact is the EIA Rocky Mountain regional regular-gasoline price, including taxes, covering Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming. Utah policy concerns only one state in that regional measure; this is not a Utah statewide average. Fuel taxes, fees, supply and retail pricing rules concern components of pump prices; they do not determine the regional average. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Utah evidence context: Rocky Mountain regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

23.Repeal on tax on petroleum(a)In generalChapter 38 is amended by striking subchapter A (and by striking the item relating to such subchapter in the table of subchapters for such chapter).(b)Conforming amendments(1)Section 4671(c) is amended to read as follows:(c)Exemptions for substances taxed under section 4661No tax shall be imposed by this section on the sale or use of any substance if tax is imposed on such sale or use under section 4661..(2)Section 9507(b) is amended—(A)in paragraph (1), by striking 4611, 4661, and inserting 4661, and(B)by striking the flush matter at the end.(3)Section 9509(b) is amended by striking paragraph (1).(4)Section 198(d)(1)(C) is amended by inserting (as in effect on the day before the enactment of the Energy Freedom Act) after section 4612(a)(3).(5)Section 4132(a)(3) is amended by inserting (as in effect on the day before the enactment of the Energy Freedom Act) after section 4612(a)(4).(6)Section 4662(a)(2) is amended by inserting (as in effect on the day before the enactment of the Energy Freedom Act) after section 4612(a)(4).(7)Section 4682(e)(2) is amended by inserting (as in effect on the day before the enactment of the Energy Freedom Act) after section 4612(a)(4).(8)Section 5000D(e)(2) is amended by inserting (as in effect on the day before the enactment of the Energy Freedom Act) after section 4612(a)(4).(c)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall take effect on January 1, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Utah officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Utah statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 6, 2026.