South Carolina · individual fact

South Carolina real gross domestic product

South Carolina’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$287.16B2025 · #24 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth3.3%2025 · #4 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$378.38B2025 · #24 of 50 · highest first

South Carolina over time

Explore South Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Carolina effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Carolina change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP South Carolina · source units
South CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $287.16B$0$13.4T$26.79TSouth Carolina, 2014: $206.08BSouth Carolina, 2015: $213.21BSouth Carolina, 2016: $220.56BSouth Carolina, 2017: $224.94BSouth Carolina, 2018: $231.65BSouth Carolina, 2019: $239.01BSouth Carolina, 2020: $232.67BSouth Carolina, 2021: $244.08BSouth Carolina, 2022: $255.6BSouth Carolina, 2023: $264.96BSouth Carolina, 2024: $277.96BSouth Carolina, 2025: $287.16B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 44National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnSouth Carolina · Strong winds damage trees and power lines around Florence and Darlington · 2015-03-05Florence–Darlington windsSouth Carolina · Storms damage Florence power lines and airport buildings · 2015-08-05Florence airport stormSouth Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-21: Flood emergency, National Guard and limited security registration relief · 2015-10-01Executive Order 2015-21South Carolina · Historic South Carolina flooding displaces residents and disrupts roads and homes · 2015-10-01South Carolina floodsSouth Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-22: Temporary freight requirements for flood response · 2015-10-02Executive Order 2015-22South Carolina · South Carolina issues Emergency Regulation 69-77: Temporary flood insurance and prescription protections · 2015-10-08Emergency Regulation 69-77South Carolina · South Carolina issues Insurance Emergency Order 2015-EO-001: Direction to comply with temporary flood insurance regulation · 2015-10-09Insurance Emergency Order 2015-EO-001South Carolina · Renewed rainfall closes Georgetown and Marion roads during ongoing flooding · 2015-10-10Renewed October floodsSouth Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-23: Retroactive legal holidays for banks and savings-and-loan institutions · 2015-10-12Executive Order 2015-23South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-25: Emergency operations in federal disaster counties · 2015-10-15Executive Order 2015-25South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-26: State Disaster Recovery Coordinator appointment · 2015-10-19Executive Order 2015-26South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-27: Paid leave for state employees affected by emergency closures · 2015-10-20Executive Order 2015-27South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-28: National Guard support for emergency infrastructure repairs · 2015-10-30Executive Order 2015-28South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-29: Separate freight and driver-hour periods for flood recovery · 2015-10-30Executive Order 2015-29South Carolina · Flooding near Mullins washes out the Old Nichols Highway bridge · 2015-11-04Mullins bridge washoutNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● South Carolina Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · South Carolina delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 92■ South Carolina agencies · 22005-08-012026-02-28

12 of 12 reviewed South Carolina actions match · 11 date markers shown. 44 major events shown separately.

South Carolina · 2025: $287.16B · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
South Carolina Real GDP · source units
PeriodSouth CarolinaRankU.S. benchmark
2025$287.16B#24 of 50$23.94T
2024$277.96B#24 of 50$23.39T
2023$264.96B#24 of 50$22.72T
2022$255.6B#24 of 50$22.08T
2021$244.08B#25 of 50$21.56T
2020$232.67B#25 of 50$20.28T
2019$239.01B#26 of 50$20.72T
2018$231.65B#26 of 50$20.19T
2017$224.94B#26 of 50$19.61T
2016$220.56B#25 of 50$19.14T
2015$213.21B#25 of 50$18.8T
2014$206.08B#25 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

South Carolina · state comparison

South Carolina output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

South Carolina · 2025$287.16B
South Carolina rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Real GDP history in South Carolina$-3.35T$12.07T$27.5T20142025
2025 · South Carolina: $287.16B · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Real GDP history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2014$206.08B
2015$213.21B
2016$220.56B
2017$224.94B
2018$231.65B
2019$239.01B
2020$232.67B
2021$244.08B
2022$255.6B
2023$264.96B
2024$277.96B
2025$287.16B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $287.16B2025 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina · your comparison$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

What makes up South Carolina GDP?

Choose an industry to compare South Carolina’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

South Carolina · 2025$1.63B
South Carolina rank#35among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in South Carolina$-42.82B$147.26B$337.33B20142025
2025 · South Carolina: $1.63B · Rank #35 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2014$1.14B
2015$1.1B
2016$1.07B
2017$1.21B
2018$1.16B
2019$1.09B
2020$1.04B
2021$1.52B
2022$1.94B
2023$1.63B
2024$1.73B
2025$1.63B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $1.63B2025 · Rank #35 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina · your comparison$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

South Carolina · 20253,245,739
South Carolina rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Total employment · jobs history in South Carolina-29,799,831110,444,469250,688,76920142025
2025 · South Carolina: 3,245,739 · Rank #23 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Total employment · jobs history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
20142,564,238
20152,636,714
20162,700,808
20172,759,989
20182,844,866
20192,883,828
20202,827,066
20212,940,247
20223,059,557
20233,131,587
20243,229,127
20253,245,739

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 3,245,7392025 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina · your comparison3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s South Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

6 statements from 6 candidates

2026 South Carolina Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Alan Wilson

1 statement

Republican · Governor · SC

Economic growth & production context

South Carolina’s roads and bridges are crumbling, and it’s past time to fix them. Our state’s growth demands serious investment in roads, bridges, and infrastructure. Alan Wilson will make infrastructure a priority, ensuring South Carolina is not only prepared for continued economic development and …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

South Carolina’s roads and bridges are crumbling, and it’s past time to fix them. Our state’s growth demands serious investment in roads, bridges, and infrastructure. Alan Wilson will make infrastructure a priority, ensuring South Carolina is not only prepared for continued economic development and population growth, but that families can spend more time at home and less time stuck in traffic. As part of his Families First Audit Initiative, he will modernize the Department of Transportation, demand transparency, streamline project timelines, and make sure every region of the state benefits from long-overdue improvements. Wilson understands rural communities have different infrastructure needs than urban communities. But we can’t prioritize one over the other–they both need attention.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alan Wilson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Carolina Secretary of State — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Mark Hammond

1 statement

Republican · Secretary of State · SC

Economic growth & production context

Expanded High-Growth Small Business Investment Framework

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Leadership for South Carolina

Candidate campaign source

Expanded High-Growth Small Business Investment Framework

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Mark Hammond — Campaign Website ↗

2026 South Carolina U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Joe Wilson

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · SC

Economic growth & production context

Joe Wilson supports an all-of-the-above energy strategy that strengthens America’s grid, lowers costs, and promotes innovation for American energy independence.. He is a leading voice for expanding energy infrastructure—including small modular reactors, next-generation nuclear technology, and respon…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Transportation and infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Joe Wilson supports an all-of-the-above energy strategy that strengthens America’s grid, lowers costs, and promotes innovation for American energy independence.. He is a leading voice for expanding energy infrastructure—including small modular reactors, next-generation nuclear technology, and responsible domestic production. By investing in modern, reliable energy systems, Joe is working to protect national security, create good jobs, and keep South Carolina at the forefront of America’s energy future.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Joe Wilson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Zyon Khalifa

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · SC

Economic growth & production context

Encourage Local Innovation: Develop mentorship programs and resources for aspiring entrepreneurs to stimulate local economic growth.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economic Growth

Candidate campaign source

Encourage Local Innovation: Develop mentorship programs and resources for aspiring entrepreneurs to stimulate local economic growth.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Zyon Khalifa — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

South Carolina incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Carolina legislators and South Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

0 matching sponsorships or proposals · 0 South Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

No retained proposals match these filters. A missing record does not mean an incumbent has taken no action.

What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current South Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.