South Carolina · individual fact

South Carolina health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages9%2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 6511%2024 · #13 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6570.1%2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first

South Carolina over time

Explore South Carolina readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. South Carolina officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a South Carolina effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a South Carolina change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages South Carolina · source units
South CarolinaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 9%7.2%10.9%14.6%South Carolina, 2014: 13.6%South Carolina, 2015: 10.9%South Carolina, 2016: 10%South Carolina, 2017: 11%South Carolina, 2018: 10.5%South Carolina, 2019: 10.8%South Carolina, 2021: 10%South Carolina, 2022: 9.1%South Carolina, 2023: 9.1%South Carolina, 2024: 9%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 29National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsSouth Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-21: Flood emergency, National Guard and limited security registration relief · 2015-10-01Executive Order 2015-21South Carolina · Historic South Carolina flooding displaces residents and disrupts roads and homes · 2015-10-01South Carolina floodsSouth Carolina · South Carolina issues Emergency Regulation 69-77: Temporary flood insurance and prescription protections · 2015-10-08Emergency Regulation 69-77South Carolina · South Carolina issues Insurance Emergency Order 2015-EO-001: Direction to comply with temporary flood insurance regulation · 2015-10-09Insurance Emergency Order 2015-EO-001South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-25: Emergency operations in federal disaster counties · 2015-10-15Executive Order 2015-25South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-26: State Disaster Recovery Coordinator appointment · 2015-10-19Executive Order 2015-26South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-27: Paid leave for state employees affected by emergency closures · 2015-10-20Executive Order 2015-27South Carolina · South Carolina issues Executive Order 2015-28: National Guard support for emergency infrastructure repairs · 2015-10-30Executive Order 2015-28National context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● South Carolina Legislature · 132● U.S. Congress · South Carolina delegation · 62◆ Governor · 13■ South Carolina agencies · 42010-03-012026-06-30

36 of 36 reviewed South Carolina actions match · 34 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.

South Carolina · 2024: 9% · Rank #14 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
South Carolina Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodSouth CarolinaRankU.S. benchmark
20249%#14 of 508.2%
20239.1%#12 of 50Not available
20229.1%#12 of 50Not available
202110%#11 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
201910.8%#11 of 50Not available
201810.5%#11 of 50Not available
201711%#9 of 50Not available
201610%#12 of 50Not available
201510.9%#13 of 50Not available
201413.6%#11 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

South Carolina · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

South Carolina · 20249%
South Carolina rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Uninsured rate · all ages history in South Carolina7.4%10.9%14.4%20142024
2024 · South Carolina: 9% · Rank #14 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
201413.6%
201510.9%
201610%
201711%
201810.5%
201910.8%
2020Not available
202110%
20229.1%
20239.1%
20249%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 9%2024 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina · your comparison9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

11.0%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of South Carolina’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
South Carolina · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare South Carolina with every state.

South Carolina · 2020$8,766
South Carolina rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in South Carolina$6.76K$8.7K$10.64K20142020
2020 · South Carolina: $8,766 · Rank #43 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
2014$7,210
2015$7,446
2016$7,669
2017$7,855
2018$7,975
2019$8,345
2020$8,766

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $8,7662020 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina · your comparison$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

South Carolina · 202275.1 years
South Carolina rank#41among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total South Carolina population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Life expectancy at birth history in South Carolina72.9 years75.5 years78.1 years20182022
2022 · South Carolina: 75.1 years · Rank #41 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
201876.5 years
201976.8 years
202074.8 years
202173.5 years
202275.1 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 75.1 years2022 · Rank #41 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina · your comparison75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

South Carolina · 202312.7%
South Carolina rank#6among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

South Carolina
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in South Carolina9.6%11.4%13.1%20192023
2023 · South Carolina: 12.7% · Rank #6 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
South Carolina Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodSouth CarolinaCompare
201911.7%
202012.1%
202112.1%
202211.1%
202312.7%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 12.7%2023 · Rank #6 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 11.9% – 13.6%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina · your comparison12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

South Carolina · June 30, 202679.4%
South Carolina rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 79.4%June 30, 2026 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina · your comparison79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

South Carolina · 2020$7,516
South Carolina rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · $7,5162020 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina · your comparison$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

South Carolina · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

South Carolina · 2023–202419.8%
South Carolina rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. South Carolina stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. South Carolina has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

South Carolina · 19.8%2023–2024 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare South Carolina with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina · your comparison19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s South Carolina candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

63 statements from 16 candidates

2026 South Carolina Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

David Stumbo

1 statement

Republican · Attorney General · SC

Care & public health

Saying you are a Republican isn't enough. David Stumbo is a lifelong conservative. David has never wavered in his conservative principles - fiercely supporting bold pro-family truths that the sanctity of life of the unborn, religious liberty, and parental rights must be protected. An advocate for la…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Saying you are a Republican isn't enough. David Stumbo is a lifelong conservative. David has never wavered in his conservative principles - fiercely supporting bold pro-family truths that the sanctity of life of the unborn, religious liberty, and parental rights must be protected. An advocate for law enforcement, healthcare freedom, lower taxes, and a transparent government - David will fight for our conservative values as Attorney General.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

David Stumbo — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 South Carolina Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements

Alan Wilson

1 statement

Republican · Governor · SC

Care & public health

Rural communities across South Carolina are getting left behind, especially when it comes to healthcare. We can’t have healthy families and thriving communities, if people can’t see a doctor. Wilson will support rural clinics, expand telemedicine, and incentive medical professionals to serve under-s…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Rural communities across South Carolina are getting left behind, especially when it comes to healthcare. We can’t have healthy families and thriving communities, if people can’t see a doctor. Wilson will support rural clinics, expand telemedicine, and incentive medical professionals to serve under-served areas.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alan Wilson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Jermaine Johnson

4 statements

Democratic · Governor · SC

Care & public health

It is time to invest in South Carolinians’ mental health. Veterans, teens, moms, dads: everyone knows someone who is struggling. Jermaine wrote a bill that calls for basic mental health training for school administrators, religious leaders, and community leaders—including neighborhood association pr…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

It is time to invest in South Carolinians’ mental health. Veterans, teens, moms, dads: everyone knows someone who is struggling. Jermaine wrote a bill that calls for basic mental health training for school administrators, religious leaders, and community leaders—including neighborhood association presidents and crime watch members—to improve early identification and response to mental health crises.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Jermaine Johnson
Care & public health

It’s time to invest in our state’s rural healthcare access. Over a third of our state live in rural communities, and yet our hospitals are overwhelming concentrated in our cities. Jermaine will fund the opening of more rural hospitals across South Carolina to provide much needed care for our citizen…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

It’s time to invest in our state’s rural healthcare access. Over a third of our state live in rural communities, and yet our hospitals are overwhelming concentrated in our cities. Jermaine will fund the opening of more rural hospitals across South Carolina to provide much needed care for our citizens.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

It is time to invest in South Carolina’s law enforcement. Jermaine would raise the salaries for and hire additional state and local law enforcement officers around the state to ensure the safety of all South Carolinians. Jermaine would also ensure that there are mental health response teams trained …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

It is time to invest in South Carolina’s law enforcement. Jermaine would raise the salaries for and hire additional state and local law enforcement officers around the state to ensure the safety of all South Carolinians. Jermaine would also ensure that there are mental health response teams trained to handle the de-escalation of crises that don’t need armed police intervention, so that those officers can focus on preventing crimes and keeping neighborhoods safe. Police do their job best when they have trust and buy in from their communities. Jermaine is committed to building that trust.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Provide better mental health care

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Provide better mental health care

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jermaine Johnson — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Walid Hakim

3 statements

Green · Governor · SC

Health coverage

With health insurance rates expected to double or triple next year, Hakim proposes creating the Carolina Insurance Company: a state-owned insurer, offering full coverage to every resident. For $100 a month per individual or $200 per family, South Carolinians would receive medical, dental, and vision…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordable Healthcare for Every South Carolinian

Candidate campaign source

With health insurance rates expected to double or triple next year, Hakim proposes creating the Carolina Insurance Company: a state-owned insurer, offering full coverage to every resident. For $100 a month per individual or $200 per family, South Carolinians would receive medical, dental, and vision coverage with no deductibles, no co-pays, and assistance for seniors, disabled, veterans, and low-income families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Walid Hakim
Care & public health

As governor of South Carolina, Hakim would take many steps to restructure law enforcement. We have created an unnecessary burden on law enforcement by envisioning the “do it all cop.” Law enforcement, traffic enforcement, first responder to car crashes, first responder to attempted suicide, first r…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

As governor of South Carolina, Hakim would take many steps to restructure law enforcement. We have created an unnecessary burden on law enforcement by envisioning the “do it all cop.” Law enforcement, traffic enforcement, first responder to car crashes, first responder to attempted suicide, first responder to mental health emergencies, first responder to animal attacks, and the list goes on. Police were not trained to respond to every situation, yet they are expected to. This creates a dangerous situation for both law enforcement and the general public when we send people to do jobs they were not trained to do. By mandating the hiring, (academy) training, and employment of SLED social workers deployed with local law enforcement, we can allow police to get back to doing what they were hired to do: enforce laws. Social workers would respond to nonviolent mental health situations and work as a victims' advocate for domestic violence, child abuse/endangerment, mental health emergencies and rape. The social worker would complete paperwork related to these events and act as the victims advocate, which would allow police to get back to what they were trained to do more quickly: enforce the laws they were sworn to uphold.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

All licensed medical professionals would be required to accept the plan as in-network, and new procedures would never be denied. Every child born in South Carolina would be automatically enrolled for life. By keeping healthcare affordable and accessible, the Carolina Insurance Company would save fam…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

All licensed medical professionals would be required to accept the plan as in-network, and new procedures would never be denied. Every child born in South Carolina would be automatically enrolled for life. By keeping healthcare affordable and accessible, the Carolina Insurance Company would save families money, support businesses, and build a healthier South Carolina.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Walid Hakim — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 South Carolina U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 10 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · SC

Healthcare costs

As a mom, former college athlete, and girls’ youth sports coach, Jenny has long made health and wellness a priority for her family. Long before it became a national movement, she believed America should focus more on preventing illness, not simply treating it. In Congress, Jenny will fight chronic d…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

As a mom, former college athlete, and girls’ youth sports coach, Jenny has long made health and wellness a priority for her family. Long before it became a national movement, she believed America should focus more on preventing illness, not simply treating it. In Congress, Jenny will fight chronic disease, put children’s health first, improve the quality and transparency of our food, bring greater transparency to healthcare costs, and hold federal health agencies and special interests accountable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jenny Costa Honeycutt — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Jenny Costa Honeycutt
Care & public health

Jenny knows families are struggling with skyrocketing costs – from groceries to housing to healthcare. She will champion policies to lower costs and advocate for responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars, so families can plan, save, and thrive. You work hard for your money; your government should …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Jenny knows families are struggling with skyrocketing costs – from groceries to housing to healthcare. She will champion policies to lower costs and advocate for responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars, so families can plan, save, and thrive. You work hard for your money; your government should work just as hard to protect it.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jenny Costa Honeycutt — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Nancy Lacore

8 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · SC

Health coverage

Restore the enhanced premium subsidies for people who buy private insurance through the Affordable Care Act.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Restoring Financial Freedom to Americans

Candidate campaign source

Restore the enhanced premium subsidies for people who buy private insurance through the Affordable Care Act.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 7 more statements from Nancy Lacore
Health coverage

Reverse Trump’s Medicaid cuts.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Reverse Trump’s Medicaid cuts.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Health coverage

Protect the Affordable Care Act’s protections for people with preexisting conditions.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Restoring Financial Freedom to Americans

Candidate campaign source

Protect the Affordable Care Act’s protections for people with preexisting conditions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Health coverage

Cap annual out-of-pocket expenses for prescription drugs for people on private health insurance, just like the cap on Medicare.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

Cap annual out-of-pocket expenses for prescription drugs for people on private health insurance, just like the cap on Medicare.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Health coverage

Allow Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices and ensure every American benefits from these negotiations. Rapidly expand the number of drugs that Medicare negotiates.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement

Candidate campaign source

Allow Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices and ensure every American benefits from these negotiations. Rapidly expand the number of drugs that Medicare negotiates.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Address rising costs that hit small businesses directly including healthcare, energy, and insurance so they can grow without passing those costs onto employees or customers.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Address rising costs that hit small businesses directly including healthcare, energy, and insurance so they can grow without passing those costs onto employees or customers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Expand the National Health Service Corp to incentivize more health care providers – especially providers working in primary care and mental health care – to serve in rural communities with provider shortages. Providers who join the National Health Service Corps receive medical school loan forgivenes…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Expand the National Health Service Corp to incentivize more health care providers – especially providers working in primary care and mental health care – to serve in rural communities with provider shortages. Providers who join the National Health Service Corps receive medical school loan forgiveness for their service.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Require a warm hand off for service members retiring with mental health concerns.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Require a warm hand off for service members retiring with mental health concerns.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Nancy Lacore — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published South Carolina candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

South Carolina incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current South Carolina legislators and South Carolina’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from South Carolina’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

179 matching sponsorships or proposals · 100 South Carolina incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Annie E. McDaniel

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 41 · D–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Annie E. McDaniel
South Carolina Legislature · HB 4383

South Carolina Medicaid Protection and Expansion Act

Apr 23, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Wendell K. Jones · Sponsored / Rep. Robert Q. Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Jermaine L. Johnson, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. John Richard C. King · Sponsored / Rep. Wendell G. Gilliard · Sponsored / Rep. Michael F. Rivers, Sr. · Sponsored / Rep. Roger K. Kirby · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Clyburn · Sponsored / Rep. Lonnie Hosey · Sponsored / Rep. Annie E. McDaniel · Sponsored / Rep. Courtney S. Waters · Sponsored / Rep. Chandra E. Dillard · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes expanding Medicaid eligibility to 138% of the federal poverty level and creating a Medicaid Stability Fund to offset federal funding reductions, with enrollment and fiscal planning requirements.

The official record’s latest entry is Referred to Committee on Ways and Means (House Journal-page 50) (2025-04-23). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

The fact measures residents under 65 without health insurance. Insurance eligibility, enrollment, coverage continuity and premium assistance concern the covered population. Provider payments and covered services alone do not establish a coverage change, and Medicare-only changes mostly concern a different age population. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 44-6-1210. (A) There is created in the State Treasury a fund to be known as the "Medicaid Stability Fund." (B) The fund shall be used exclusively to offset reductions in federal Medicaid funding that impact the State of South Carolina or its Medicaid-eligible populations. […] Section 44-6-1220. (A) The Department of Health and Human Services shall take all actions necessary to fully expand Medicaid eligibility as provided for under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, including: (1) expanding eligibility to individuals earning up to one hundred thirty-eight percent of the federal poverty level; and (2) accessing the enhanced federal match rate of ninety percent for new enrollees. (B) The department shall develop an enrollment plan, fiscal impact report, and implementation timeline within ninety days of the effective date of this article. (C) The department shall submit its report and implementation plan to the General Assembly and the Governor within one hundred twenty days of the effective date of this article.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. April Cromer

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 6 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. April Cromer
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3594

Constitutional Carry

Mar 14, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Beach · Sponsored / Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. T. Alan Morgan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert J. "Rob" Harris · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon L. Cox · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph S. "Joe" White · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gibson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Kathy Landing · Sponsored / Rep. Dennis C. Moss · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows lawful open or concealed firearm carrying without a permit, retains the permit system, lowers the permit application age to 18, and requires free SLED permit training throughout the state. Other possession and location restrictions remain applicable.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 111 (2024-03-14). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The availability of a permit to carry a concealable weapon under this section must not be construed to prohibit the permitless transport or carrying of a firearm in a vehicle or on or about one's person, whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, in a manner not prohibited by law. […] (V)(1) The State Law Enforcement Division shall provide a statewide concealed weapon permit training course that satisfies the proof of training requirement for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. SLED may not charge participants a fee of any kind for the concealed weapon permit training course provided for in this subsection. SLED may contract with private certified concealed weapon permit training class instructors or local law enforcement to provide the course or SLED itself may provide the course. (2) The training course must be offered in every county in South Carolina at least twice per month. If demand exceeds the capacity of the training course in any county, SLED shall provide additional classes until there exists a sufficient number of classes offered at least twice a month to meet the demand for training in each respective county. If SLED is unable to contract with a certified concealed weapon permit training class instructor or local law enforcement in any county, SLED must conduct the training class for that county. […] (D) The State Law Enforcement Division shall develop a document and distribute it to retailers that are federally licensed to engage in the business of dealing in or selling firearms in South Carolina. Such retailers shall provide the document to gun purchasers in South Carolina to inform them that South Carolina law provides a process for gun owners to obtain a concealed weapon permit and allows law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons without a permit. The document must inform gun purchasers that if a gun owner commits a crime involving a concealable weapon, and the owner does not have a valid concealed weapon permit, then there may be an additional criminal penalty for the underlying offense. […] (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except subject to subsection (B), SLED must issue a permit, which is no larger than three and one-half inches by three inches in size, to carry a concealable weapon to a resident or qualified nonresident who is at least eighteen years of age and who is not prohibited by state law from possessing the weapon upon submission of:
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 78 · D–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Beth E. Bernstein
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3587

Criminally negligent storage of firearms

Mar 10, 2025 · Not enacted

Rep. Beth E. Bernstein · Sponsored / Rep. Paula Rawl Calhoon · Sponsored / Rep. Hamilton R. Grant · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Bauer · Sponsored / Rep. Carla M. Schuessler · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Proposes criminal penalties when negligent firearm storage allows a child to access a loaded firearm, with higher penalties when a discharge causes death or serious injury and specified lawful-use and unlawful-entry defenses.

The official record’s latest entry is Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Schuessler (2025-03-10). No enactment is recorded as of September 6, 2026; a proposed effective date does not establish enactment.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(1) "Child" means a person younger than eighteen years of age. (2) "Criminal negligence" means the reckless disregard of the safety of others. […] (5) "Readily dischargeable firearm" means a firearm that is loaded with ammunition, whether or not a round is in the chamber. (6) "Secure" means to take steps that a reasonable person would take to prevent a child's access to a readily dischargeable firearm including, but not limited to, placing a firearm in a locked container or temporarily rendering the firearm inoperable by a trigger lock or other means. […] (B) A person commits an offense if a child gains access to a readily dischargeable firearm, and the person, with criminal negligence: (1) failed to secure the firearm; or (2) left the firearm in a manner that the person knew or should have known a child would be able to gain access to the firearm. (C) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the child's access to the firearm: (1) was supervised by a person eighteen years of age or older, and was for hunting, sporting, or other lawful purposes; (2) consisted of lawful defense by the child of people or property; or (3) was gained as the result of an unlawful entry by any person. (D)(1) Except as provided in item (2), a person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than one thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both. (2) For violations of this section in which the child discharges the firearm and causes death or serious bodily injury to himself or another person, a person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than two thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than three years, or both.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Bill Taylor

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 86 · R–SC

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Bill Taylor
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3650

Discharging firearms into dwellings and other structures

May 26, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises offenses and penalties for deliberately or recklessly firing into regularly occupied structures or occupied vehicles, including enhanced penalties when someone is struck or injured. The text preserves specified defense and hunting exceptions. Assault-related conduct is only one component of reported violent crime.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 138 (2026-05-26). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 16-23-440. (A) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (B) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into any vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. For purposes of this section an unmanned aerial vehicle shall not constitute an aircraft. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (C) A person who discharges or causes to be discharged a firearm in a criminally negligent manner while in preparation for, engaged in the act of, or returning from hunting, in violation of Section 50-1-85, cannot be charged with a violation of this section. Nothing however herein prohibits the charging of a violation under any other applicable section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3594

Constitutional Carry

Mar 14, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Beach · Sponsored / Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. T. Alan Morgan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert J. "Rob" Harris · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon L. Cox · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph S. "Joe" White · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gibson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Kathy Landing · Sponsored / Rep. Dennis C. Moss · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows lawful open or concealed firearm carrying without a permit, retains the permit system, lowers the permit application age to 18, and requires free SLED permit training throughout the state. Other possession and location restrictions remain applicable.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 111 (2024-03-14). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The availability of a permit to carry a concealable weapon under this section must not be construed to prohibit the permitless transport or carrying of a firearm in a vehicle or on or about one's person, whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, in a manner not prohibited by law. […] (V)(1) The State Law Enforcement Division shall provide a statewide concealed weapon permit training course that satisfies the proof of training requirement for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. SLED may not charge participants a fee of any kind for the concealed weapon permit training course provided for in this subsection. SLED may contract with private certified concealed weapon permit training class instructors or local law enforcement to provide the course or SLED itself may provide the course. (2) The training course must be offered in every county in South Carolina at least twice per month. If demand exceeds the capacity of the training course in any county, SLED shall provide additional classes until there exists a sufficient number of classes offered at least twice a month to meet the demand for training in each respective county. If SLED is unable to contract with a certified concealed weapon permit training class instructor or local law enforcement in any county, SLED must conduct the training class for that county. […] (D) The State Law Enforcement Division shall develop a document and distribute it to retailers that are federally licensed to engage in the business of dealing in or selling firearms in South Carolina. Such retailers shall provide the document to gun purchasers in South Carolina to inform them that South Carolina law provides a process for gun owners to obtain a concealed weapon permit and allows law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons without a permit. The document must inform gun purchasers that if a gun owner commits a crime involving a concealable weapon, and the owner does not have a valid concealed weapon permit, then there may be an additional criminal penalty for the underlying offense. […] (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except subject to subsection (B), SLED must issue a permit, which is no larger than three and one-half inches by three inches in size, to carry a concealable weapon to a resident or qualified nonresident who is at least eighteen years of age and who is not prohibited by state law from possessing the weapon upon submission of:
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3126

Vaccine mandates

May 2, 2022 · Enacted

Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Nathan Ballentine · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Provides unemployment-benefit eligibility for state or local-government employees when a federal COVID-19 vaccination mandate requires termination to avoid forfeiting federal funds, subject to ordinary benefit requirements. It also prohibits vaccination-based compensation reductions for specified first responders.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 142 (2022-05-02). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(B) If the State or any political subdivision thereof, including a school district, is subject to a federal requirement that would lead to the forfeiture of federal funds due to a failure to require employees, independent contractors, or nonemployee vendors to receive a COVID-19 vaccination: (1) the employer may require an unvaccinated employee, independent contractor, or nonemployee vendor to undergo weekly COVID-19 testing if the federal requirement allows for testing as an alternative to vaccination; or (2) the employee is eligible for unemployment benefits subject to the benefit amounts, duration, and requirements as provided in Article 1, Chapter 35, Title 41 if the federal mandate gives the employer no alternative to terminating the employee without forfeiting federal funds. […] "Section 8-15-80. (A) Neither the State, nor any of its political subdivisions, may terminate, suspend, or otherwise reduce the compensation of a person employed as a first responder if the first responder does not undergo a COVID-19 vaccination.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3094

Open Carry with Training Act

Jun 1, 2021 · Enacted

Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lonnie Hosey · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. T. Case Brittain, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy A. "Tim" McGinnis · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Historically allowed holders of valid concealed-weapon permits to carry openly, while preserving specified employer and property-owner restrictions. Later permitless-carry legislation is a separate action.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 66 (2021-06-01). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"(5) 'Concealable weapon' means a firearm having a length of less than twelve inches measured along its greatest dimension that may be carried openly on one's person or in a manner that is hidden from public view in normal wear of clothing except when needed for self defense, defense of others, and the protection of real or personal property." […] (b) carried openly or concealed on or about his person, and he has a valid concealed weapons permit pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23;" […] (1) the right of a public or private employer to prohibit a person who is licensed under this article from carrying a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon the premises of the business or work place or while using any machinery, vehicle, or equipment owned or operated by the business; (2) the right of a private property owner or person in legal possession or control to allow or prohibit the carrying of a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon his premises. (B) The posting by the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control of a sign stating 'NO CONCEALABLE WEAPONS ALLOWED' shall constitute notice to a person holding a permit issued pursuant to this article that the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control requests that concealable weapons, whether concealed or openly carried, not be brought upon the premises or into the work place. A person who brings a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, onto the premises or work place in violation of the provisions of this paragraph may be charged with a violation of Section 16-11-620. In addition to the penalties provided in Section 16-11-620, a person convicted of a second or subsequent violation of the provisions of this paragraph must have his permit revoked for a period of one year. The prohibition contained in this section does not apply to persons specified in Section 16-23-20, item (1).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brandon L. Cox

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 92 · R–SC

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Brandon L. Cox
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3594

Constitutional Carry

Mar 14, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Beach · Sponsored / Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. T. Alan Morgan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert J. "Rob" Harris · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon L. Cox · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph S. "Joe" White · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gibson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Kathy Landing · Sponsored / Rep. Dennis C. Moss · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows lawful open or concealed firearm carrying without a permit, retains the permit system, lowers the permit application age to 18, and requires free SLED permit training throughout the state. Other possession and location restrictions remain applicable.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 111 (2024-03-14). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The availability of a permit to carry a concealable weapon under this section must not be construed to prohibit the permitless transport or carrying of a firearm in a vehicle or on or about one's person, whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, in a manner not prohibited by law. […] (V)(1) The State Law Enforcement Division shall provide a statewide concealed weapon permit training course that satisfies the proof of training requirement for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. SLED may not charge participants a fee of any kind for the concealed weapon permit training course provided for in this subsection. SLED may contract with private certified concealed weapon permit training class instructors or local law enforcement to provide the course or SLED itself may provide the course. (2) The training course must be offered in every county in South Carolina at least twice per month. If demand exceeds the capacity of the training course in any county, SLED shall provide additional classes until there exists a sufficient number of classes offered at least twice a month to meet the demand for training in each respective county. If SLED is unable to contract with a certified concealed weapon permit training class instructor or local law enforcement in any county, SLED must conduct the training class for that county. […] (D) The State Law Enforcement Division shall develop a document and distribute it to retailers that are federally licensed to engage in the business of dealing in or selling firearms in South Carolina. Such retailers shall provide the document to gun purchasers in South Carolina to inform them that South Carolina law provides a process for gun owners to obtain a concealed weapon permit and allows law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons without a permit. The document must inform gun purchasers that if a gun owner commits a crime involving a concealable weapon, and the owner does not have a valid concealed weapon permit, then there may be an additional criminal penalty for the underlying offense. […] (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except subject to subsection (B), SLED must issue a permit, which is no larger than three and one-half inches by three inches in size, to carry a concealable weapon to a resident or qualified nonresident who is at least eighteen years of age and who is not prohibited by state law from possessing the weapon upon submission of:
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Brandon Newton

South Carolina House of Representatives · District 45 · R–SC

3 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Brandon Newton
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3650

Discharging firearms into dwellings and other structures

May 26, 2026 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises offenses and penalties for deliberately or recklessly firing into regularly occupied structures or occupied vehicles, including enhanced penalties when someone is struck or injured. The text preserves specified defense and hunting exceptions. Assault-related conduct is only one component of reported violent crime.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 138 (2026-05-26). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 16-23-440. (A) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a dwelling house, other building, structure, or enclosure regularly occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (B) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly, unlawfully and deliberately or with a reckless disregard for life discharge or cause to be discharged firearms at or into any vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied unless it is in defense of that person's own property or the life of himself or another as provided in Title 16, Chapter 11, Article 6. A person need not have a specific intent to strike a vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other conveyance, device, or equipment while it is occupied by persons to be guilty under this section. For purposes of this section an unmanned aerial vehicle shall not constitute an aircraft. A person who violates the provisions of this subsection is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than: (1) twenty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than ten years; and (2) fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned not more than fifteen years when any occupant is struck or bodily injury occurs as a proximate cause of the discharge of a firearm. (C) A person who discharges or causes to be discharged a firearm in a criminally negligent manner while in preparation for, engaged in the act of, or returning from hunting, in violation of Section 50-1-85, cannot be charged with a violation of this section. Nothing however herein prohibits the charging of a violation under any other applicable section.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3594

Constitutional Carry

Mar 14, 2024 · Enacted

Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Beach · Sponsored / Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. April Cromer · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. T. Alan Morgan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. M. Brian Lawson · Sponsored / Rep. Donald G. "Don" Chapman · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Sen. Matthew W. "Matt" Leber · Sponsored / Rep. Jordan S. Pace · Sponsored / Rep. Robert J. "Rob" Harris · Sponsored / Rep. John Gregory "Jay" Kilmartin · Sponsored / Rep. Gary S. Brewer, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Robby Robbins · Sponsored / Rep. William "Bill" Hager · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon L. Cox · Sponsored / Rep. David Vaughan · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph S. "Joe" White · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Gibson · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Joseph M. "Joe" Bustos · Sponsored / Rep. William G. "Bill" Herbkersman · Sponsored / Rep. Kathy Landing · Sponsored / Rep. Dennis C. Moss · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Allows lawful open or concealed firearm carrying without a permit, retains the permit system, lowers the permit application age to 18, and requires free SLED permit training throughout the state. Other possession and location restrictions remain applicable.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 111 (2024-03-14). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(2) The availability of a permit to carry a concealable weapon under this section must not be construed to prohibit the permitless transport or carrying of a firearm in a vehicle or on or about one's person, whether openly or concealed, loaded or unloaded, in a manner not prohibited by law. […] (V)(1) The State Law Enforcement Division shall provide a statewide concealed weapon permit training course that satisfies the proof of training requirement for the issuance of a concealed weapon permit. SLED may not charge participants a fee of any kind for the concealed weapon permit training course provided for in this subsection. SLED may contract with private certified concealed weapon permit training class instructors or local law enforcement to provide the course or SLED itself may provide the course. (2) The training course must be offered in every county in South Carolina at least twice per month. If demand exceeds the capacity of the training course in any county, SLED shall provide additional classes until there exists a sufficient number of classes offered at least twice a month to meet the demand for training in each respective county. If SLED is unable to contract with a certified concealed weapon permit training class instructor or local law enforcement in any county, SLED must conduct the training class for that county. […] (D) The State Law Enforcement Division shall develop a document and distribute it to retailers that are federally licensed to engage in the business of dealing in or selling firearms in South Carolina. Such retailers shall provide the document to gun purchasers in South Carolina to inform them that South Carolina law provides a process for gun owners to obtain a concealed weapon permit and allows law-abiding gun owners to carry their weapons without a permit. The document must inform gun purchasers that if a gun owner commits a crime involving a concealable weapon, and the owner does not have a valid concealed weapon permit, then there may be an additional criminal penalty for the underlying offense. […] (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except subject to subsection (B), SLED must issue a permit, which is no larger than three and one-half inches by three inches in size, to carry a concealable weapon to a resident or qualified nonresident who is at least eighteen years of age and who is not prohibited by state law from possessing the weapon upon submission of:
Review official supporting evidence ↗
South Carolina Legislature · HB 3094

Open Carry with Training Act

Jun 1, 2021 · Enacted

Rep. James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Sponsored / Rep. Micajah P. "Micah" Caskey IV · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Chumley · Sponsored / Rep. Neal A. Collins · Sponsored / Rep. Heather Ammons Crawford · Sponsored / Rep. Sylleste H. Davis · Sponsored / Sen. Jason Elliott · Sponsored / Rep. Shannon S. Erickson · Sponsored / Rep. Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Craig A. Gagnon · Sponsored / Rep. Gil Gatch · Sponsored / Rep. Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Sponsored / Rep. Patrick B. Haddon · Sponsored / Rep. Kevin Hardee · Sponsored / Rep. Lee Hewitt · Sponsored / Rep. David R. Hiott · Sponsored / Rep. William M. "Bill" Hixon · Sponsored / Rep. Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Sponsored / Rep. Steven Wayne Long · Sponsored / Rep. Josiah Magnuson · Sponsored / Rep. John R. McCravy III · Sponsored / Rep. Brandon Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Wm. Weston J. Newton · Sponsored / Rep. Melissa Lackey Oremus · Sponsored / Rep. Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Sponsored / Rep. G. Murrell Smith, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Marvin "Mark" Smith · Sponsored / Rep. Bill Taylor · Sponsored / Rep. William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Sponsored / Rep. Mark N. Willis · Sponsored / Rep. Chris Wooten · Sponsored / Rep. Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Sponsored / Rep. Donald Ryan McCabe, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Lonnie Hosey · Sponsored / Rep. Travis A. Moore · Sponsored / Rep. William H. Bailey · Sponsored / Rep. Phillip D. Lowe · Sponsored / Rep. Lucas Atkinson · Sponsored / Rep. Jeffrey E. "Jeff" Johnson · Sponsored / Rep. T. Case Brittain, Jr. · Sponsored / Rep. Timothy A. "Tim" McGinnis · Sponsored / Rep. Jeff Bradley · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Historically allowed holders of valid concealed-weapon permits to carry openly, while preserving specified employer and property-owner restrictions. Later permitless-carry legislation is a separate action.

The official record’s latest entry is Act No. 66 (2021-06-01). This records enactment, not present enforceability.

Why this record is included

Firearm mortality includes suicide, homicide, and other intents. The provision concerns firearm access, safety, or prevention of firearm injury and may address only part of the death count. This connection does not establish causation. An action after the measurement period cannot explain an earlier observed value.

Retained South Carolina evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

"(5) 'Concealable weapon' means a firearm having a length of less than twelve inches measured along its greatest dimension that may be carried openly on one's person or in a manner that is hidden from public view in normal wear of clothing except when needed for self defense, defense of others, and the protection of real or personal property." […] (b) carried openly or concealed on or about his person, and he has a valid concealed weapons permit pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23;" […] (1) the right of a public or private employer to prohibit a person who is licensed under this article from carrying a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon the premises of the business or work place or while using any machinery, vehicle, or equipment owned or operated by the business; (2) the right of a private property owner or person in legal possession or control to allow or prohibit the carrying of a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, upon his premises. (B) The posting by the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control of a sign stating 'NO CONCEALABLE WEAPONS ALLOWED' shall constitute notice to a person holding a permit issued pursuant to this article that the employer, owner, or person in legal possession or control requests that concealable weapons, whether concealed or openly carried, not be brought upon the premises or into the work place. A person who brings a concealable weapon, whether concealed or openly carried, onto the premises or work place in violation of the provisions of this paragraph may be charged with a violation of Section 16-11-620. In addition to the penalties provided in Section 16-11-620, a person convicted of a second or subsequent violation of the provisions of this paragraph must have his permit revoked for a period of one year. The prohibition contained in this section does not apply to persons specified in Section 16-23-20, item (1).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current South Carolina officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a South Carolina statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.