Rhode Island · individual fact

Rhode Island health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages4.6%2024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 655.6%2024 · #46 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6572.9%2024 · #22 of 50 · highest first

Rhode Island over time

Explore Rhode Island readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Rhode Island officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Rhode Island effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Rhode Island change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Rhode Island · source units
Rhode IslandPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 4.6%3.1%6.1%9.2%Rhode Island, 2014: 7.4%Rhode Island, 2015: 5.7%Rhode Island, 2016: 4.3%Rhode Island, 2017: 4.6%Rhode Island, 2018: 4.1%Rhode Island, 2019: 4.1%Rhode Island, 2021: 4.3%Rhode Island, 2022: 4.2%Rhode Island, 2023: 4.5%Rhode Island, 2024: 4.6%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Rhode Island Legislature · 82222● U.S. Congress · Rhode Island delegation · 1◆ Governor · 1■ Rhode Island agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2010-03-012026-06-30

10 of 10 reviewed Rhode Island actions match · 6 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

Rhode Island · 2024: 4.6% · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Rhode Island Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodRhode IslandRankU.S. benchmark
20244.6%#46 of 508.2%
20234.5%#44 of 50Not available
20224.2%#47 of 50Not available
20214.3%#47 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20194.1%#49 of 50Not available
20184.1%#47 of 50Not available
20174.6%#46 of 50Not available
20164.3%#45 of 50Not available
20155.7%#44 of 50Not available
20147.4%#43 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Rhode Island · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Rhode Island · 20244.6%
Rhode Island rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Rhode Island
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Rhode Island3.5%6.1%8.8%20142024
2024 · Rhode Island: 4.6% · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Rhode Island Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodRhode IslandCompare
20147.4%
20155.7%
20164.3%
20174.6%
20184.1%
20194.1%
2020Not available
20214.3%
20224.2%
20234.5%
20244.6%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · 4.6%2024 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island · your comparison4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

5.6%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Rhode Island’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
Rhode Island · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Rhode Island with every state.

Rhode Island · 2020$11,694
Rhode Island rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Rhode Island
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Rhode Island$7.37K$9.82K$12.26K20142020
2020 · Rhode Island: $11,694 · Rank #12 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Rhode Island Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodRhode IslandCompare
2014$9,484
2015$9,914
2016$10,159
2017$10,290
2018$10,464
2019$10,988
2020$11,694

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · $11,6942020 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island · your comparison$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Rhode Island · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Rhode Island · 202279.2 years
Rhode Island rank#8among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Rhode Island population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Rhode Island
Life expectancy at birth history in Rhode Island77.2 years78.7 years80.1 years20182022
2022 · Rhode Island: 79.2 years · Rank #8 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Rhode Island Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodRhode IslandCompare
201879.8 years
201979.5 years
202078.2 years
202178.5 years
202279.2 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · 79.2 years2022 · Rank #8 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island · your comparison79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Rhode Island · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Rhode Island · 202310%
Rhode Island rank#26among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Rhode Island
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Rhode Island8.8%10%11.1%20192023
2023 · Rhode Island: 10% · Rank #26 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Rhode Island Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodRhode IslandCompare
20199.1%
20209.2%
20219.2%
202210.2%
202310%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · 10%2023 · Rank #26 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 9.1% – 11%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island · your comparison10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Rhode Island · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Rhode Island · June 30, 202674.3%
Rhode Island rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · 74.3%June 30, 2026 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island · your comparison74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Rhode Island · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Rhode Island · 2020$7,326
Rhode Island rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · $7,3262020 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island · your comparison$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Rhode Island · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Rhode Island · 2023–202425.8%
Rhode Island rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · 25.8%2023–2024 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island · your comparison25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Rhode Island candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

26 statements from 9 candidates

2026 Rhode Island Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 6 statements

Kim Ahern

6 statements

Democratic · Attorney General · RI

Care & public health

Protecting access to health care is essential to protecting Rhode Islanders’ health, safety, and economic security. Hospital mergers and consolidation across the medical system can raise prices and lower the quality of care. The Attorney General plays a critical role in reviewing health care mergers…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Protecting access to health care is essential to protecting Rhode Islanders’ health, safety, and economic security. Hospital mergers and consolidation across the medical system can raise prices and lower the quality of care. The Attorney General plays a critical role in reviewing health care mergers and acquisitions to ensure they benefit patients. As Attorney General, I will take that responsibility seriously by closely scrutinizing proposed transactions and blocking deals that prioritize profits over patients. I will fight to shore up Rhode Island’s health care system by protecting access to quality care, supporting a stable and sustainable hospital network, and ensuring that the hospitals and medical services Rhode Islanders rely on remain open and available when they are needed most. I will work to protect healthcare workers from workplace violence, and ensure that nursing homes, hospitals, child care providers, and public services have the staffing and resources they need to serve Rhode Islanders safely and effectively.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kim Ahern — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 5 more statements from Kim Ahern
Care & public health

Kim will fight to protect access to sexual and reproductive healthcare in the State and to ensure that Rhode Island is a leader in the pursuit of reproductive justice and bodily autonomy for all.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Kim will fight to protect access to sexual and reproductive healthcare in the State and to ensure that Rhode Island is a leader in the pursuit of reproductive justice and bodily autonomy for all.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kim Ahern — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Care & public health

Social media algorithms and cyberbullying have been linked to a youth mental health crisis. It’s increasingly clear many social media companies understand these harms and fail to mitigate the risks. As Attorney General, I will prosecute platforms that violate data privacy laws, promote harmful algor…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Social media algorithms and cyberbullying have been linked to a youth mental health crisis. It’s increasingly clear many social media companies understand these harms and fail to mitigate the risks. As Attorney General, I will prosecute platforms that violate data privacy laws, promote harmful algorithmic content, or fail to protect minors. As Artificial Intelligence tools become more ubiquitous and more powerful, I will ensure Rhode Island is leading the charge to protect children from AI-generated deepfakes and the potential super-charging of other digital harms.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kim Ahern — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy are fundamental rights that must be protected. I was proud to serve on Governor Gina Raimondo’s team when Rhode Island enshrined the protections of Roe v. Wade into state law, ensuring that the right to choose is safeguarded here at home even as it comes unde…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

Reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy are fundamental rights that must be protected. I was proud to serve on Governor Gina Raimondo’s team when Rhode Island enshrined the protections of Roe v. Wade into state law, ensuring that the right to choose is safeguarded here at home even as it comes under attack nationally. As Attorney General, I will be ready to defend that law and ensure every Rhode Islander has the right to choose whether, how, and when to start a family. At a time of continued and coordinated efforts to roll back reproductive rights across the country, Rhode Island needs an Attorney General who will stand firm, go to court when necessary, and use the full power of the office to protect access to reproductive health care, privacy, and dignity for all. Learn more about my Reproductive Justice Initiative here.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kim Ahern — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

When the Trump administration attacks Rhode Islanders and threatens our fundamental rights, the Attorney General is the first line of defense. I will stand up to unlawful federal actions that harm our communities, whether on immigration, health care access, reproductive freedom, voting rights, or en…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive rights and health care

Candidate campaign source

When the Trump administration attacks Rhode Islanders and threatens our fundamental rights, the Attorney General is the first line of defense. I will stand up to unlawful federal actions that harm our communities, whether on immigration, health care access, reproductive freedom, voting rights, or environmental protections. That includes making sure Rhode Islanders understand their rights when approached by ICE or other federal law enforcement so no one is intimidated, targeted, or stripped of protections guaranteed under the law. As Attorney General, I will not hesitate to take the Trump administration to court when it oversteps its authority or puts our residents at risk. Rhode Island deserves an Attorney General who will defend our values, protect our people, and use every legal tool available to hold the federal government accountable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kim Ahern — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Public safety also means recognizing when treatment and support are more effective than incarceration. As Attorney General, I will work to expand diversion opportunities that connect people struggling with mental illness and addiction to the care they need, while still holding individuals accountabl…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Public safety also means recognizing when treatment and support are more effective than incarceration. As Attorney General, I will work to expand diversion opportunities that connect people struggling with mental illness and addiction to the care they need, while still holding individuals accountable and keeping communities safe. That means strengthening partnerships with courts, law enforcement, treatment providers, and community organizations to ensure timely access to mental health services, substance use treatment, and recovery supports – a continuation of the work I did on criminal justice reform in the Raimondo administration. By investing in evidence-based diversion programs and treatment options, we can break cycles of addiction and crisis, reduce repeat offenses, and help people stabilize their lives.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kim Ahern — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Rhode Island Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Aaron Guckian

1 statement

Republican · Governor · RI

Care & public health

Reduce administrative barriers and make health care more accessible, affordable, and reliable.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health Care

Candidate campaign source

Reduce administrative barriers and make health care more accessible, affordable, and reliable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Aaron Guckian campaign source ↗

Helena Foulkes

1 statement

Democratic · Governor · RI

Health coverage

reimbursement rate issues. Increasing Medicaid rates for primary care services and mental health services is

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Helena's Plans for Rhode Island

Candidate campaign source

reimbursement rate issues. Increasing Medicaid rates for primary care services and mental health services is

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Helena Foulkes — validated position source ↗

Jasjit Gotra

1 statement

Independent · Governor · RI

Care & public health

Cap out-of-pocket costs. Let cross-state competition drive prices down. Healthcare is a right, not a luxury.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: GRIT Platform

Candidate campaign source

Cap out-of-pocket costs. Let cross-state competition drive prices down. Healthcare is a right, not a luxury.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Jasjit Gotra campaign source 1 ↗

2026 Rhode Island U.S. House District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Kellie Keenan

3 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · RI

Care & public health

Expand pathways for doctors and healthcare professionals

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Expand pathways for doctors and healthcare professionals

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kellie Keenan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Kellie Keenan
Care & public health

Keep healthcare focused on patients, not bureaucracy

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Keep healthcare focused on patients, not bureaucracy

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kellie Keenan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Invest in our Community Health Centers — empower them to lead American healthcare forward.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Invest in our Community Health Centers — empower them to lead American healthcare forward.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Kellie Keenan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Rhode Island candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Rhode Island incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Rhode Island legislators and Rhode Island’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Rhode Island’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

8 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 Rhode Island incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. June S. Speakman

Rhode Island House, District 68 · D–RI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. June S. Speakman
Rhode Island Legislature · H 5426

RELATING TO INSURANCE -- INDIVIDUAL HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE

Jun 21, 2023 · Enacted · Chapter 214

Rep. June S. Speakman · Sponsored / Rep. Rebecca Kislak · Co-sponsored / Rep. Susan R. Donovan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Edith H. Ajello · Co-sponsored / Rep. David Morales · Co-sponsored / Rep. Lauren H. Carson · Co-sponsored / Rep. David A. Bennett · Co-sponsored / Rep. Karen Alzate · Co-sponsored / Rep. Michelle McGaw · Co-sponsored / Rep. Carol Hagan McEntee · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The 2023 companion laws guarantee individual-market coverage availability to eligible Rhode Island residents and prohibit denial of enrollment or preexisting-condition exclusions under the specified provisions. Annual and special enrollment periods, network service-area and capacity limits, and financial-reserve exceptions still apply. The connection is to enrollment availability; the laws also contain separate benefit provisions, which are not evidence of increased insurance enrollment.

Chapter 214, enacted 2023-06-21. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures the uninsured share of residents under 65. Individual-market enrollment protections and Medicaid/CHIP continuous eligibility concern coverage for subsets of that population. Availability is not proof of enrollment or fewer uninsured residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Rhode Island evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

27-18.5-3. Guaranteed availability to certain individuals. (a) Subject to subsections (b) through (i) of this section, all health insurance carriers that offer health insurance coverage in the individual market in this state shall provide for the guaranteed availability of coverage to any eligible applicant. For the purposes of this section, an "eligible applicant" means any individual resident of this state. A carrier offering health insurance coverage in the individual market shall offer to any eligible applicant in the state all health insurance coverage plans of that carrier that are approved for sale in the individual market and shall accept any eligible applicant that applies for coverage under those plans. A carrier may not: (1) Decline to offer the coverage to, or deny enrollment of, the individual; or (2) Impose any preexisting condition exclusion with respect to the coverage. (b) All health insurance carriers that offer health insurance coverage in the individual market in this state shall offer all policy forms of health insurance coverage to all eligible applicants. Provided, a carrier may offer plans with reduced cost sharing for qualifying eligible applicants, based on available federal funds including those described by 42 U.S.C. § 18071, or based on a program established with state funds. (c)(1) A carrier may deny health insurance coverage in the individual market to an eligible applicant if the carrier has demonstrated to the commissioner that: (i) It does not have the financial reserves necessary to underwrite additional coverage; and (ii) It is applying this subsection uniformly to all individuals in the individual market in this state consistent with applicable state law and without regard to any health status-related factor of the individuals . (2) A carrier upon denying individual health insurance coverage in this state in accordance with this subsection may not offer that coverage in the individual market in this state for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days after the date the coverage is denied or until the carrier has demonstrated to the commissioner that the carrier has sufficient financial reserves to underwrite additional coverage, whichever is later. (d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require that a carrier offering health insurance coverage only in connection with group health plans or through one or more bona fide associations, or both, offer health insurance coverage in the individual market. (e) A carrier offering health insurance coverage in connection with group health plans under this title shall not be deemed to be a health insurance carrier offering individual health insurance coverage solely because the carrier offers a conversion policy. (f) Except for any high risk pool rating rules to be established by the office of the health insurance commissioner (OHIC) as described in this section, nothing in this section shall be construed to create additional restrictions on the amount of premium rates that a carrier may charge an individual for health insurance coverage provided in the individual market; or to prevent a health insurance carrier offering health insurance coverage in the individual market from establishing premium rates or modifying applicable copayments or deductibles in return for adherence to programs of health promotion and disease prevention. (g) OHIC may pursue federal funding in support of the development of a high risk pool for the individual market, as defined in § 27-18.5-2, contingent upon a thorough assessment of any financial obligation of the state related to the receipt of said federal funding being presented to, and approved by, the general assembly by passage of concurrent general assembly resolution. The components of the high risk pool program, including, but not limited to, rating rules, eligibility requirements and administrative processes, shall be designed in accordance with § 2745 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-45) also known as the State High Risk Pool Funding Extension Act of 2006 and defined in regulations promulgated by the office of the health insurance commissioner on or before October 1, 2007. (h)(1) In the case of a health insurance carrier that offers health insurance coverage in the individual market through a network plan, the carrier may limit the individuals who may be enrolled under that coverage to those who live, reside, or work within the service areas for the network plan; and within the service areas of the plan, deny coverage to individuals if the carrier has demonstrated to the director that: (i) It will not have the capacity to deliver services adequately to additional individual enrollees because of its obligations to existing group contract holders and enrollees and individual enrollees; and (ii) It is applying this subsection uniformly to individuals without regard to any health status-related factor of the individuals and without regard to whether the individuals are eligible individuals. (2) Upon denying health insurance coverage in any service area in accordance with the terms of this subsection, a carrier may not offer coverage in the individual market within the service area for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days after the coverage is denied. (i) A carrier must allow an eligible applicant to enroll in coverage during: (A) An open enrollment period to be established by the commissioner and held annually for a period of between thirty (30) and sixty (60) days; (B) Special enrollment periods as established in accordance with the version of 45 C.F.R. § 147.104 in effect on January 1, 2023; and (C) Any other open enrollment periods or special enrollment periods established by federal or state law, rule or regulation.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Justine Caldwell

Rhode Island House, District 30 · D–RI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Justine Caldwell
Rhode Island Legislature · H 7373

RELATING TO CRIMINAL OFFENSES -- WEAPONS

Jun 13, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 107

Rep. Justine Caldwell · Sponsored / Rep. Jason Knight · Co-sponsored / Rep. Deborah A. Fellela · Co-sponsored / Rep. José F. Batista · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jennifer Boylan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Katherine S. Kazarian · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kathleen A. Fogarty · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jennifer A. Stewart · Co-sponsored / Rep. Carol Hagan McEntee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Arthur Handy · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The 2024 companion laws require stored firearms to be secured in a locked container or with an engaged tamper-resistant lock or safety device that prevents unauthorized operation, except when carried or readily carried by an authorized nearby user. Unsafe storage carries civil fines up to $250 for a first offense and $1,000 for a second; a third or later offense can carry up to six months in jail, a $500 fine, or both. Separate criminal-storage offenses require that the person knew or reasonably should have known a child under 18 could gain access without parental permission, or a prohibited person could gain access, and that access actually occurred. Second-degree storage carries up to one year, $1,000, or both; first-degree storage additionally requires use in a crime or to cause injury and carries up to five years, $5,000, or both. Exceptions address illegal entry or taking, secured storage, an authorized nearby user, and lawful self-defense or defense of another. The law also directs consideration of an injured child’s parent or guardian and states a gross-negligence prosecution standard for accidental shootings. Enactment does not establish fewer firearm deaths.

Chapter 107, enacted 2024-06-13. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The CDC fact measures age-adjusted firearm deaths across intents. Secure-storage duties concern access to firearms and risks including suicide, accidental death and fatal violence. Storage violations and injuries are not themselves death counts. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Rhode Island evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

11-47-60.1. Safe storage - Unsafe storage of a firearm. (a) Nothing in this section shall be construed to reduce or limit any existing right to purchase and own firearms and/or ammunition or to provide authority to any state or local agency to infringe upon the privacy of any family, home or business except by lawful warrant. (b) A person who stores or leaves a firearm in any place is guilty of the violation of unsafe storage of a firearm unless the firearm is secured in a locked container or equipped with a tamper- resistant mechanical lock or other safety device, properly engaged in order to render such firearm inoperable by any person other than the owner or other lawfully authorized user. This section does not apply to a firearm that is being carried by or can be readily carried by a lawfully authorized user who is in proximity to the firearm. Any violation of this subsection shall result in, for a first offense, a civil infraction punishable by a fine of not more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and for a second offense, a civil infraction punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000). A third or subsequent violation of this subsection shall, upon conviction, be punished by imprisonment for no more than six (6) months, or a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500), or both. (c) A person who stores or leaves on premises under their control a firearm and who knows or reasonably should know that a child is likely to gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child’s parent or guardian, or who knows or reasonably should know that a person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms is likely to gain access to the firearm, is guilty of criminal storage of a firearm in the second degree if a child or person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms obtains access to the firearm. Any person who violates this section shall, upon conviction, be punished by imprisonment for no more than one year, or be fined not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) or both. For purposes of this section, a “child” is defined as any person who has not attained the age of eighteen (18) years. (d) A person is guilty of criminal storage of a firearm in the first degree if they commit the crime of criminal storage in the second degree and the firearm obtained by a child or a person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms is used by said person in the commission of a crime or to cause injury to himself or herself or any other person. Any violation of this subsection shall, upon conviction, be punishable by imprisonment for not more than five (5) years, or a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000), or both. (e) The provisions of subsections (c) and (d) of this section shall not apply whenever any of the following occurs: (1) The child or person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms obtains the firearm as a result of an illegal entry of any premises by any person or an illegal taking of the firearm from the premises of the owner without permission of the owner; (2) The firearm is secured in a locked container or equipped with a tamper-resistant mechanical lock or other safety device, properly engaged in order to render such firearm inoperable by any person other than the owner or other lawfully authorized user; (3) The firearm is being carried by or can be readily carried by a lawfully authorized user who is in proximity to the firearm; or (4) (5) The child or person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms obtains or obtains and discharges the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense or defense of another person. (f)(1) If the person who allegedly violated this section is the parent or guardian of a child who is injured or who dies as the result of an accidental shooting, the attorney general shall consider among other factors, the impact of the injury or death on the person who has allegedly violated this section when deciding whether to prosecute an alleged violation. (2) It is the intent of the general assembly that a parent or guardian of a child who is injured or who dies of an accidental shooting shall be prosecuted only in those instances in which the parent or guardian behaved in a grossly negligent manner.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Katherine S. Kazarian

Rhode Island House, District 63 · D–RI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Katherine S. Kazarian
Rhode Island Legislature · H 5006

RELATING TO STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT -- HEALTH CARE FOR CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMEN -- EQUALITY IN ABORTION COVERAGE

May 18, 2023 · Enacted · Chapter 17

Rep. Katherine S. Kazarian · Sponsored / Rep. Leonela Felix · Co-sponsored / Rep. Edith H. Ajello · Co-sponsored / Rep. Karen Alzate · Co-sponsored / Rep. Christopher R. Blazejewski · Co-sponsored / Rep. Kathleen A. Fogarty · Co-sponsored / Rep. Carol Hagan McEntee · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jason Knight · Co-sponsored / Rep. Joshua J. Giraldo · Co-sponsored / Rep. Lauren H. Carson · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The 2023 companion laws extend coverage to lawful pregnancy terminations for people eligible under the specified medical-assistance programs, using federal funds only where federally permitted. They also repeal the state-employee insurance abortion exclusion. The connection concerns abortion coverage; it does not attribute changes in abortion counts or overall insurance enrollment to these laws.

Chapter 17, enacted 2023-05-18. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts abortions by area of occurrence, including care for nonresidents. Abortion coverage and protections for lawful reproductive care concern access, without demonstrating a change in the number of abortions. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Rhode Island evidence context: Abortions reported by area of occurrence. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(h) Any person eligible for services under subsections (a) and (b) of this section, or otherwise eligible for medical assistance under Title XIX [42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.] and Title XXI [42 U.S.C. § 1397aa et seq.] of the Social Security Act, shall also be entitled to services for any termination of pregnancy permitted under § 23-4.13-2; provided, however, that no federal funds shall be used to pay for such services, except as authorized under federal law. SECTION 3. Section 36-12-2.1 of the General Laws in Chapter 36-12 entitled "Insurance Benefits" is hereby repealed.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Susan R. Donovan

Rhode Island House, District 69 · D–RI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Susan R. Donovan
Rhode Island Legislature · H 6244

RELATING TO HEALTH AND SAFETY -- LICENSING OF HEALTHCARE FACILITIES

Jul 1, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 361

Rep. Susan R. Donovan · Sponsored / Rep. June S. Speakman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Megan L. Cotter · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jennifer Boylan · Co-sponsored / Rep. Tina L. Spears · Co-sponsored / Rep. Joshua J. Giraldo · Co-sponsored / Rep. Karen Alzate · Co-sponsored / Rep. Jenni A. Furtado · Co-sponsored / Rep. Grace Diaz · Co-sponsored / Rep. David Morales · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The 2025 companion laws add a patient right in licensed healthcare facilities: patients must not be asked about immigration status or asked to present proof of lawful presence in the United States. The provision took effect upon passage. It concerns questions asked in care settings; it does not grant immigration status, insurance coverage or immunity from federal law.

Chapter 361, enacted 2025-07-01. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and noncitizens with many statuses. Patient protections concerning immigration-status questions may affect subsets of this population. Birthplace does not establish legal status, and this rule does not demonstrate a population change. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Rhode Island evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(19) The patient shall not be asked about their immigration status or asked to present proof of their legal presence in the United States. SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Bridget Valverde

Rhode Island Senate, District 35 · D–RI

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Bridget Valverde
Rhode Island Legislature · S 32

RELATING TO STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT -- HEALTH CARE FOR CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMEN--EQUALITY IN ABORTION COVERAGE

May 18, 2023 · Enacted · Chapter 18

Sen. Bridget Valverde · Sponsored / Sen. Tiara T. Mack · Co-sponsored / Sen. V. Susan Sosnowski · Co-sponsored / Sen. Jonathon Acosta · Co-sponsored / Sen. Melissa Murray · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ryan W. Pearson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Dawn Euer · Co-sponsored / Sen. Alana M. DiMario · Co-sponsored / Sen. Valarie J. Lawson · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The 2023 companion laws extend coverage to lawful pregnancy terminations for people eligible under the specified medical-assistance programs, using federal funds only where federally permitted. They also repeal the state-employee insurance abortion exclusion. The connection concerns abortion coverage; it does not attribute changes in abortion counts or overall insurance enrollment to these laws.

Chapter 18, enacted 2023-05-18. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts abortions by area of occurrence, including care for nonresidents. Abortion coverage and protections for lawful reproductive care concern access, without demonstrating a change in the number of abortions. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Rhode Island evidence context: Abortions reported by area of occurrence. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(h) Any person eligible for services under subsections (a) and (b) of this section, or otherwise eligible for medical assistance under Title XIX [42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.] and Title XXI [42 U.S.C. § 1397aa et seq.] of the Social Security Act, shall also be entitled to services for any termination of pregnancy permitted under § 23-4.13-2; provided, however, that no federal funds shall be used to pay for such services, except as authorized under federal law. SECTION 3. Section 36-12-2.1 of the General Laws in Chapter 36-12 entitled "Insurance Benefits" is hereby repealed.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Pamela J. Lauria

Rhode Island Senate, District 32 · D–RI

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Pamela J. Lauria
Rhode Island Legislature · S 487

RELATING TO HEALTH AND SAFETY -- LICENSING OF HEALTHCARE FACILITIES

Jul 1, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 362

Sen. Pamela J. Lauria · Sponsored / Sen. Jonathon Acosta · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ana B. Quezada · Co-sponsored / Sen. Lammis J. Vargas · Co-sponsored / Sen. Valarie J. Lawson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Tiara T. Mack · Co-sponsored / Sen. Alana M. DiMario · Co-sponsored / Sen. Dawn Euer · Co-sponsored / Sen. Ryan W. Pearson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Linda L. Ujifusa · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The 2025 companion laws add a patient right in licensed healthcare facilities: patients must not be asked about immigration status or asked to present proof of lawful presence in the United States. The provision took effect upon passage. It concerns questions asked in care settings; it does not grant immigration status, insurance coverage or immunity from federal law.

Chapter 362, enacted 2025-07-01. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and noncitizens with many statuses. Patient protections concerning immigration-status questions may affect subsets of this population. Birthplace does not establish legal status, and this rule does not demonstrate a population change. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Rhode Island evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(19) The patient shall not be asked about their immigration status or asked to present proof of their legal presence in the United States. SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Rhode Island Legislature · S 2202

RELATING TO CRIMINAL OFFENSES -- WEAPONS

Jun 13, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 108

Sen. Pamela J. Lauria · Sponsored / Sen. Ryan W. Pearson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Valarie J. Lawson · Co-sponsored / Sen. Hanna M. Gallo · Co-sponsored / Sen. Dawn Euer · Co-sponsored / Sen. Alana M. DiMario · Co-sponsored / Sen. Walter S. Felag Jr. · Co-sponsored / Sen. Louis P. DiPalma · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The 2024 companion laws require stored firearms to be secured in a locked container or with an engaged tamper-resistant lock or safety device that prevents unauthorized operation, except when carried or readily carried by an authorized nearby user. Unsafe storage carries civil fines up to $250 for a first offense and $1,000 for a second; a third or later offense can carry up to six months in jail, a $500 fine, or both. Separate criminal-storage offenses require that the person knew or reasonably should have known a child under 18 could gain access without parental permission, or a prohibited person could gain access, and that access actually occurred. Second-degree storage carries up to one year, $1,000, or both; first-degree storage additionally requires use in a crime or to cause injury and carries up to five years, $5,000, or both. Exceptions address illegal entry or taking, secured storage, an authorized nearby user, and lawful self-defense or defense of another. The law also directs consideration of an injured child’s parent or guardian and states a gross-negligence prosecution standard for accidental shootings. Enactment does not establish fewer firearm deaths.

Chapter 108, enacted 2024-06-13. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The CDC fact measures age-adjusted firearm deaths across intents. Secure-storage duties concern access to firearms and risks including suicide, accidental death and fatal violence. Storage violations and injuries are not themselves death counts. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Rhode Island evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

11-47-60.1. Safe storage - Unsafe storage of a firearm. (a) Nothing in this section shall be construed to reduce or limit any existing right to purchase and own firearms and/or ammunition or to provide authority to any state or local agency to infringe upon the privacy of any family, home or business except by lawful warrant. (b) A person who stores or leaves a firearm in any place is guilty of the violation of unsafe storage of a firearm unless the firearm is secured in a locked container or equipped with a tamper- resistant mechanical lock or other safety device, properly engaged in order to render such firearm inoperable by any person other than the owner or other lawfully authorized user. This section does not apply to a firearm that is being carried by or can be readily carried by a lawfully authorized user who is in proximity to the firearm. Any violation of this subsection shall result in, for a first offense, a civil infraction punishable by a fine of not more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250), and for a second offense, a civil infraction punishable by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000). A third or subsequent violation of this subsection shall, upon conviction, be punished by imprisonment for no more than six (6) months, or a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500), or both. (c) A person who stores or leaves on premises under their control a firearm and who knows or reasonably should know that a child is likely to gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child’s parent or guardian, or who knows or reasonably should know that a person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms is likely to gain access to the firearm, is guilty of criminal storage of a firearm in the second degree if a child or person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms obtains access to the firearm. Any person who violates this section shall, upon conviction, be punished by imprisonment for no more than one year, or be fined not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) or both. For purposes of this section, a “child” is defined as any person who has not attained the age of eighteen (18) years. (d) A person is guilty of criminal storage of a firearm in the first degree if they commit the crime of criminal storage in the second degree and the firearm obtained by a child or a person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms is used by said person in the commission of a crime or to cause injury to himself or herself or any other person. Any violation of this subsection shall, upon conviction, be punishable by imprisonment for not more than five (5) years, or a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000), or both. (e) The provisions of subsections (c) and (d) of this section shall not apply whenever any of the following occurs: (1) The child or person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms obtains the firearm as a result of an illegal entry of any premises by any person or an illegal taking of the firearm from the premises of the owner without permission of the owner; (2) The firearm is secured in a locked container or equipped with a tamper-resistant mechanical lock or other safety device, properly engaged in order to render such firearm inoperable by any person other than the owner or other lawfully authorized user; (3) The firearm is being carried by or can be readily carried by a lawfully authorized user who is in proximity to the firearm; or (4) (5) The child or person who is prohibited, under state or federal law, from purchasing or possessing firearms obtains or obtains and discharges the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense or defense of another person. (f)(1) If the person who allegedly violated this section is the parent or guardian of a child who is injured or who dies as the result of an accidental shooting, the attorney general shall consider among other factors, the impact of the injury or death on the person who has allegedly violated this section when deciding whether to prosecute an alleged violation. (2) It is the intent of the general assembly that a parent or guardian of a child who is injured or who dies of an accidental shooting shall be prosecuted only in those instances in which the parent or guardian behaved in a grossly negligent manner.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Rhode Island officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Rhode Island statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.