Rhode Island · individual fact

Rhode Island budget, debt, and interest

Rhode Island state-government finances, comparable debt and interest figures, and the enacted budget.

The national companion measures federal finances. Here the unit is Rhode Island state government. Federal debt is not allocated to Rhode Island; a state budget is not the federal budget.

State debt outstanding$11.41BFY2024 · #25 of 50 · highest first
Interest expenditure$484.95MFY2024 · #22 of 50 · highest first
Total state tax collections$5.29BFY2024 · #44 of 50 · highest first

Rhode Island over time

Explore Rhode Island readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Rhode Island officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Rhode Island effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Rhode Island change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

No comparable time series is retained for this topic. The chart shows events and reviewed actions; current state comparisons appear below.

Rhode Island government actions Rhode Island · source units

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Events and reviewed actionsNo saved observations in this range.Sep 1, 2005Feb 28, 2026
✦ Major events & context · 50National context · Hurricane Katrina emergency appropriations · 2005-09-08Katrina relief fundingNational context · Medicare prescription drug benefit begins · 2006-01-01Medicare Part D beginsNational context · Iraq and Afghanistan war funding assessment · 2007-07-31War funding assessmentNational context · Economic Stimulus Act tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 tax rebatesNational context · Treasury support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac · 2008-09-07Fannie / Freddie supportNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Emergency stabilization law creates TARP · 2008-10-03TARP stabilizationNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Affordable Care Act changes health financing · 2010-03-23Health-care financing lawNational context · Tax extensions and payroll-tax relief · 2010-12-172010 tax / benefit dealNational context · Budget Control Act and debt-limit agreement · 2011-08-022011 budget agreementNational context · S&P lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2011-08-05S&P rating downgradeNational context · Fiscal-cliff tax agreement · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff agreementNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · Shutdown ends and debt limit is suspended · 2013-10-172013 funding / debt dealNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 · 2013-12-262013 budget caps dealNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 · 2015-11-022015 budget / debt dealNational context · Fed begins lifting rates after the crisis · 2015-12-16Fed rate normalizationNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 · 2018-02-092018 budget / debt dealNational context · 2018–19 partial government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 funding lapseNational context · Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 · 2019-08-022019 budget / debt dealNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and Treasury purchases · 2020-03-15Fed pandemic responseNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · Further pandemic relief and annual funding · 2020-12-27December pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure fundingNational context · Congress raises the debt limit after two impasses · 2021-12-162021 debt-limit increaseNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor funding and investment credits · 2022-08-09CHIPS fundingNational context · PACT Act expands veterans’ benefits · 2022-08-10Veterans’ benefits expansionNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes taxes and spending · 2022-08-16Energy / health / tax lawNational context · Student-loan cancellation cost recorded · 2022-09-30Loan-cost accountingNational context · Inflation and rates raise interest costs above forecasts · 2023-01-09Inflation / interest costsNational context · Fed reports suspension of Treasury payments · 2023-01-13Fed payments suspendedNational context · Disaster tax deadlines move into the next fiscal year · 2023-02-24Disaster tax deferralsNational context · Fiscal Responsibility Act · 2023-06-032023 debt-limit agreementNational context · Fitch lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2023-08-01Fitch rating downgradeNational context · Student-loan cost reversal lowers recorded outlays · 2023-08-31Loan-cost reversalNational context · National security supplemental funding · 2024-04-24Security supplementalNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act becomes law · 2025-01-05Social Security benefitsNational context · Treasury begins extraordinary measures · 2025-01-21Debt-limit measuresNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02Tariffs / customs receiptsNational context · Moody’s lowers the U.S. sovereign credit rating · 2025-05-16Moody’s rating downgradeNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 federal government shutdown · 2025-10-012025 funding lapseNational context · Supreme Court rejects IEEPA tariff authority · 2026-02-20Tariff authority ruling● Rhode Island Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Rhode Island delegation · 1◆ Governor · 1■ Rhode Island agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-02-28

3 of 3 reviewed Rhode Island actions match · 3 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.

How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Rhode Island · state comparison

State debt and interest

Compare state-government balances and interest expenditure from the same Census fiscal-year survey.

Rhode Island · FY2024$11.41B
Rhode Island rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.1TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

State debt outstanding

Long-term debt outstanding plus short-term debt outstanding at fiscal year end.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Excludes local-government debt. Dollar ranks describe scale, not credit quality.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · $728.59MHigher value · $166.39BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · $11.41BFY2024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
State debt outstanding · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$166.39B—
#2New York$120.59B—
#3Texas$70.05B—
#4Massachusetts$65.87B—
#5New Jersey$57.23B—
#6Pennsylvania$48.67B—
#7Illinois$43.38B—
#8Virginia$33.73B—
#9Connecticut$33.27B—
#10Ohio$32.29B—
#11Washington$30.62B—
#12Maryland$25.9B—
#13Michigan$25.02B—
#14Colorado$23.57B—
#15Wisconsin$22.79B—
#16Florida$20.14B—
#17Minnesota$17.03B—
#18Oregon$16.91B—
#19Louisiana$16.09B—
#20South Carolina$15.36B—
#21West Virginia$15.08B—
#22Georgia$14.05B—
#23North Carolina$13.13B—
#24Hawaii$11.72B—
#25Rhode Island · your comparison$11.41B—
#26Alabama$10.99B—
#27Oklahoma$10.15B—
#28Kentucky$10.08B—
#29Tennessee$9.03B—
#30Indiana$8.52B—
#31Iowa$8.06B—
#32Arkansas$8.05B—
#33Mississippi$7.72B—
#34New Hampshire$7.58B—
#35Kansas$7.16B—
#36New Mexico$7.12B—
#37Missouri$6.99B—
#38Arizona$6.88B—
#39Alaska$5.72B—
#40Utah$5.55B—
#41Maine$5.3B—
#42North Dakota$4.89B—
#43South Dakota$4.67B—
#44Delaware$3.69B—
#45Nebraska$3.39B—
#46Nevada$2.89B—
#47Montana$2.76B—
#48Vermont$2.67B—
#49Wyoming$1.26B—
#50Idaho$728.59M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Rhode Island · state comparison

Where state revenue comes from

All measures use Census state-government records for FY2024. Categories describe collections; they do not rank statutory tax rates.

Rhode Island · FY2024$1.63B
Rhode Island rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$465.4BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

General sales-tax collections

Census category T09.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $54.35BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · $1.63BFY2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
General sales-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas$54.35B—
#2California$53.33B—
#3Florida$40.09B—
#4Washington$22.81B—
#5New York$19.99B—
#6Ohio$16.33B—
#7Illinois$16.05B—
#8Pennsylvania$15.6B—
#9New Jersey$14.31B—
#10Tennessee$14.08B—
#11Arizona$13.16B—
#12Michigan$12.7B—
#13North Carolina$12.16B—
#14Indiana$10.96B—
#15Massachusetts$9.4B—
#16Georgia$9.01B—
#17Minnesota$8.49B—
#18Nevada$8.4B—
#19Wisconsin$7.59B—
#20Virginia$7.4B—
#21Maryland$6.85B—
#22South Carolina$6.44B—
#23Connecticut$6.23B—
#24Kentucky$5.8B—
#25Missouri$5.26B—
#26Mississippi$5.07B—
#27Arkansas$5.07B—
#28Louisiana$4.87B—
#29Hawaii$4.79B—
#30Colorado$4.67B—
#31Iowa$4.64B—
#32Utah$4.63B—
#33Alabama$4.59B—
#34Kansas$4.33B—
#35New Mexico$4.33B—
#36Oklahoma$3.81B—
#37Idaho$3.09B—
#38Nebraska$2.97B—
#39Maine$2.35B—
#40West Virginia$1.82B—
#41South Dakota$1.68B—
#42Rhode Island · your comparison$1.63B—
#43Oregon$1.34B—
#44North Dakota$1.32B—
#45Wyoming$1.01B—
#46Vermont$597.33M—
#47Alaska$0—
#47Delaware$0—
#47Montana$0—
#47New Hampshire$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Rhode Island · state comparison

Where state operating spending goes

Census categories allow consistent comparisons. These selected categories are not a breakdown of the current Rhode Island appropriations act.

Rhode Island · FY2024$4.54B
Rhode Island rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.02TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Public welfare current operations

Current operations for public welfare institutions and other public welfare, excluding capital and transfers.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · $1.09BHigher value · $156.71BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · $4.54BFY2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Public welfare current operations · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$156.71B—
#2New York$97.35B—
#3Texas$57.32B—
#4Illinois$41.13B—
#5Florida$40.11B—
#6Ohio$39.77B—
#7Pennsylvania$39.34B—
#8Massachusetts$34.12B—
#9North Carolina$30.64B—
#10New Jersey$28.06B—
#11Arizona$26.02B—
#12Michigan$24.37B—
#13Virginia$23.68B—
#14Minnesota$23.37B—
#15Indiana$22.93B—
#16Maryland$21.61B—
#17Kentucky$20.54B—
#18Oregon$20.47B—
#19Washington$19.6B—
#20Georgia$18.99B—
#21Louisiana$18.69B—
#22Tennessee$16.42B—
#23Wisconsin$16.26B—
#24Missouri$15.65B—
#25Oklahoma$14.57B—
#26Colorado$13.6B—
#27South Carolina$12.84B—
#28New Mexico$10.72B—
#29Iowa$10.26B—
#30Alabama$9.73B—
#31Arkansas$8.67B—
#32Mississippi$8.08B—
#33Utah$6.91B—
#34Kansas$6.84B—
#35Nevada$6.62B—
#36West Virginia$6.24B—
#37Maine$5.7B—
#38Nebraska$4.97B—
#39Connecticut$4.88B—
#40Rhode Island · your comparison$4.54B—
#41Hawaii$4.14B—
#42Delaware$3.97B—
#43Idaho$3.73B—
#44Alaska$3.27B—
#45Montana$2.89B—
#46New Hampshire$2.72B—
#47Vermont$2.69B—
#48North Dakota$2.09B—
#49South Dakota$1.95B—
#50Wyoming$1.09B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Rhode Island · state comparison

State operating costs and the enacted budget

The enacted plan, spending categories and audited activity use different periods and accounting scopes; they are kept separate.

Rhode Island · FY2024$8.93B
Rhode Island rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$2.04TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Current operation expenditure

Sum of Census current-operation expenditure categories, excluding capital outlay, interest, and assistance/subsidy expenditure.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. This FY2024 comparison differs in scope and period from Rhode Island’s FY2027 appropriations and Fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 audit shown below.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.

Lower value · $4.01BHigher value · $287.03BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Rhode Island · $8.93BFY2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Current operation expenditure · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$287.03B—
#2New York$161.37B—
#3Texas$136.18B—
#4Florida$86.61B—
#5Pennsylvania$77.15B—
#6Illinois$75.67B—
#7Ohio$66.77B—
#8New Jersey$64.53B—
#9Massachusetts$61.38B—
#10North Carolina$59.01B—
#11Michigan$57.27B—
#12Virginia$53.45B—
#13Washington$49.82B—
#14Georgia$45.19B—
#15Maryland$45.06B—
#16Oregon$41.41B—
#17Arizona$38.71B—
#18Minnesota$38.1B—
#19Indiana$37.4B—
#20Kentucky$36.94B—
#21Wisconsin$34.5B—
#22Missouri$34.43B—
#23South Carolina$32.85B—
#24Colorado$32.73B—
#25Louisiana$31.67B—
#26Tennessee$31.12B—
#27Alabama$26.99B—
#28Oklahoma$24.28B—
#29Utah$22.7B—
#30New Mexico$21.94B—
#31Connecticut$21.22B—
#32Iowa$19.89B—
#33Kansas$18.39B—
#34Hawaii$16.62B—
#35Mississippi$16.46B—
#36Arkansas$16.28B—
#37West Virginia$13.19B—
#38Nevada$12.43B—
#39Nebraska$10.41B—
#40Maine$10.12B—
#41Delaware$9.24B—
#42Rhode Island · your comparison$8.93B—
#43Alaska$8.4B—
#44Idaho$8.21B—
#45New Hampshire$7.12B—
#46Montana$6.44B—
#47Vermont$6.28B—
#48North Dakota$5.63B—
#49South Dakota$4.55B—
#50Wyoming$4.01B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

FY2027 · Signed June 12, 2026

Enacted appropriations

$15.2B

All FY2027 expenditures in the General Assembly's Budget as Enacted from general revenues, federal grants, restricted receipts, and other funds. The budget reflects remaining unspent American Rescue Plan fiscal-recovery and capital-project resources as described by House Fiscal Advisory Staff; appropriations are authority and do not mean every dollar will be spent during FY2027.

Where State tax revenue comes from

FY2025 ACFR actual

Shares of the $5.098 billion in tax revenue reported on Rhode Island's government-wide Statement of Activities. These are State primary-government taxes net of estimated refunds and uncollectible amounts; municipal property-tax collections are not consolidated into this State total.

Personal income tax
$2.0B · 38.6%
Sales and use taxes
$1.8B · 35.5%
General business taxes
$666.2M · 13.1%
Other taxes
$480.2M · 9.4%
Gasoline tax
$172.4M · 3.4%

FY2027 enacted budget by function

FY2027 enacted all-funds budget

The six official statewide function totals in the General Assembly's Budget as Enacted. The exact amounts reconcile to the $15.243 billion all-funds headline.

Human services
$6.9B · 45.3%
Education
$3.7B · 24.3%
General government
$2.4B · 15.7%
Transportation
$1.1B · 7.5%
Public safety
$906.9M · 5.9%
Natural resources
$186.9M · 1.2%

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt from FactVote’s Rhode Island candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

7 statements from 5 candidates

2026 Rhode Island Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Aaron Guckian

2 statements

Republican · Governor · RI

Budgets, spending & debt

The plan includes targeted tax relief, reducing hidden fees, and cutting wasteful government spending. “We will put money back where it belongs—in the pockets of hardworking families.”

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lowering Taxes and Fees for Working Families

Candidate campaign source

The plan includes targeted tax relief, reducing hidden fees, and cutting wasteful government spending. “We will put money back where it belongs—in the pockets of hardworking families.”

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Aaron Guckian campaign source ↗
View 1 more statement from Aaron Guckian
Budgets, spending & debt

Provide targeted tax relief, reduce hidden fees, and cut wasteful government spending.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes and Fees

Candidate campaign source

Provide targeted tax relief, reduce hidden fees, and cut wasteful government spending.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Aaron Guckian campaign source ↗

2026 Rhode Island U.S. House District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

2026 Rhode Island U.S. Senate — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements

Jack Reed

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. Senate · RI

Budgets, spending & debt

Using his hard-earned know-how and seats on the powerful Appropriations and Armed Services Committees, Jack Reed is leading the fight in the Senate against Donald Trump’s outrageous abuses of power and dangerous military policies that are weakening our national security.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans

Candidate campaign source

Using his hard-earned know-how and seats on the powerful Appropriations and Armed Services Committees, Jack Reed is leading the fight in the Senate against Donald Trump’s outrageous abuses of power and dangerous military policies that are weakening our national security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jack Reed — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Michael Bahry

1 statement

Independent · U.S. Senate · RI

Budgets, spending & debt

Rhode Island was founded on religious liberty. Faith is something most humans have in some way or another. Michael believes that our different beliefs should be talked about in honest respectful ways by everyone, including politicians. He also believes that open discussion about different faith issu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Platform for Rhode Island

Candidate campaign source

Rhode Island was founded on religious liberty. Faith is something most humans have in some way or another. Michael believes that our different beliefs should be talked about in honest respectful ways by everyone, including politicians. He also believes that open discussion about different faith issues can and should contribute to how policy is formed and how budgets are formulated. The goal should always be to make our state, our nation and our world more merciful and just.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Michael Bahry campaign source ↗

Ray McKay

2 statements

Republican · U.S. Senate · RI

Budgets, spending & debt

Balance the Federal Budget

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Right Direction Right Now

Candidate campaign source

Balance the Federal Budget

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Ray McKay — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Ray McKay
Budgets, spending & debt

Stop government’s deficit spending, Balance the budget.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Stop government’s deficit spending, Balance the budget.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Ray McKay — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt terms in retained, attributed source text from published Rhode Island candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Rhode Island incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Rhode Island legislators and Rhode Island’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Rhode Island’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Rhode Island incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Marvin L. Abney

Rhode Island House, District 73 · D–RI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Marvin L. Abney
Rhode Island Legislature · H 5076

MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE STATE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2026

Jun 29, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 278 · Without signature

Rep. Marvin L. Abney · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Article 11, section 8 of the fiscal 2026 budget sets a 40-cent-per-gallon motor-fuel tax component for periods beginning July 1, 2025. Beginning July 1, 2027 and every other year thereafter, it requires CPI-U adjustments using the specified September 30 measurements from the two prior calendar years, rounded to the nearest cent, with a floor of 40 cents. This is not the total of all fuel taxes and fees or a verified eight-cent increase from the previously indexed rate. The budget became law without the governor’s signature on June 29, 2025; no signing credit is assigned. The connection is limited to this fuel-tax provision and does not establish a change in New England gasoline prices.

Chapter 278, became law without the governor’s signature 2025-06-29. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The gasoline fact is a six-state New England regional price proxy, not a Rhode Island-only price. A Rhode Island fuel-tax provision concerns one price component in one of those states; it does not establish regional prices or how much was passed through to consumers. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Rhode Island evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 8. Sections 31-36-7 and 31-36-20 of the General Laws in Chapter 31-36 entitled "Motor Fuel Tax" are hereby amended to read as follows: 31-36-7. Monthly report of distributors — Payment of tax. (a) State requirements. (1) Every distributor shall, on or before the twentieth (20th) day of each month, render a report to the tax administrator, upon forms to be obtained from the tax administrator, of the amount (number of gallons) of fuels purchased, sold, or used by the distributor within this state and the amount of fuels sold by the distributor without this state from fuels within this state during the preceding calendar month, and, if required by the tax administrator as to purchases, the name or names of the person or persons from whom purchased and the date and amount of each purchase, and as to sales, the name or names of the person or persons to whom sold and the amount of each sale, and shall pay at the same time to the administrator tax at the rate of thirty-two cents ($0.32) per gallon on all taxable gallons of fuel sold or used in this state for periods ending on or before June 30, 2025. (2) Every distributor shall, on or before the twentieth day of each month, render a report to the tax administrator, upon forms to be obtained from the tax administrator, of the amount (number of gallons) of fuels purchased, sold, or used by the distributor within this state and the amount of fuels sold by the distributor without this state from fuels within this state during the preceding calendar month, and, if required by the tax administrator as to purchases, the name or names of the person or persons from whom purchased and the date and amount of each purchase, and as to sales, the name or names of the person or persons to whom sold and the amount of each sale, and shall pay at the same time to the administrator, tax at the rate of forty cents ($0.40) per gallon on all taxable gallons of fuel sold or used in this state for periods beginning on or after July 1, 2025. (b) Federal requirements. In the event the federal government requires a certain portion of the gasoline tax to be dedicated for highway improvements, then the state controller is directed to establish a restricted receipt account and deposit that portion of gasoline tax receipts which brings the state into federal compliance. (1) Beginning July 1, 2015, and every other year thereafter, through June 30, 2025, the gasoline tax shall be adjusted by the percentage of increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics determined as of September 30 of the prior calendar year; said adjustment shall be rounded to the nearest one cent ($.01) increment, provided that the total tax shall not be less than provided for in section (a) (1). (2) Beginning July 1, 2027, and every other year thereafter, the gasoline tax shall be adjusted by the percentage of increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI- U) as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics determined as of September 30 of the two (2) prior calendar years; said adjustment shall be rounded to the nearest one cent ($0.01) increment; provided that, the total tax shall not be less than provided for in subsection (a) (2).
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse

U.S. Senate, Rhode Island · D–RI

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse
U.S. Congress · Rhode Island delegation · S 2069

Stabilize Medicaid and CHIP Coverage Act

Jun 12, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse sponsored S. 2069. It proposes removing the under-19 limit from Medicaid’s 12-month continuous-enrollment provision and making corresponding CHIP changes, beginning in the first fiscal quarter on or after December 31, 2026. Other eligibility and statutory exceptions remain. The bill concerns continuity of insurance enrollment; no enactment or Rhode Island coverage increase was recorded by this review.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill recorded at review.

Why this record is included

The fact measures the uninsured share of residents under 65. Individual-market enrollment protections and Medicaid/CHIP continuous eligibility concern coverage for subsets of that population. Availability is not proof of enrollment or fewer uninsured residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Rhode Island evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.Providing for 12-month continuous enrollment of individuals under the Medicaid program and Children’s Health Insurance Program(a)In generalSection 1902(e)(12) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(e)(12)), as amended by section 5112 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, is further amended—(1)in the header, by striking for children;(2)in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking who is under the age of 19 and;(3)in subparagraph (A), by adding or at the end;(4)by striking subparagraph (B); and(5)by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B).(b)CHIPSection 2107(e)(1)(K) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397gg(e)(1)(K)), as amended by section 5112 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, is further amended—(1)by striking for children;(2)by striking a targeted low-income child and inserting an individual; and(3)by striking child becomes and inserting individual becomes.(c)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall take effect on the first day of the first fiscal quarter that begins on or after December 31, 2026.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Rhode Island officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Rhode Island statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.