Rhode Island state-government finances, comparable debt and interest figures, and the enacted budget.
The national companion measures federal finances. Here the unit is Rhode Island state government. Federal debt is not allocated to Rhode Island; a state budget is not the federal budget.
State debt outstanding$11.41BFY2024 · #25 of 50 · highest first
Interest expenditure$484.95MFY2024 · #22 of 50 · highest first
Total state tax collections$5.29BFY2024 · #44 of 50 · highest first
Rhode Island over time
Explore Rhode Island readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Rhode Island officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Rhode Island effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Rhode Island change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
No comparable time series is retained for this topic. The chart shows events and reviewed actions; current state comparisons appear below.
Rhode Island government actions Rhode Island · source units
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
3 of 3 reviewed Rhode Island actions match · 3 date markers shown. 50 major events shown separately.
How major events are selected
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Rhode Island · state comparison
State debt and interest
Compare state-government balances and interest expenditure from the same Census fiscal-year survey.
Rhode Island · FY2024$11.41B
Rhode Island rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.1TSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
State debt outstanding
Long-term debt outstanding plus short-term debt outstanding at fiscal year end.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Excludes local-government debt. Dollar ranks describe scale, not credit quality.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.
Lower value · $728.59MHigher value · $166.39BStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Rhode Island · $11.41BFY2024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
State debt outstanding · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
$166.39B
—
#2
New York
$120.59B
—
#3
Texas
$70.05B
—
#4
Massachusetts
$65.87B
—
#5
New Jersey
$57.23B
—
#6
Pennsylvania
$48.67B
—
#7
Illinois
$43.38B
—
#8
Virginia
$33.73B
—
#9
Connecticut
$33.27B
—
#10
Ohio
$32.29B
—
#11
Washington
$30.62B
—
#12
Maryland
$25.9B
—
#13
Michigan
$25.02B
—
#14
Colorado
$23.57B
—
#15
Wisconsin
$22.79B
—
#16
Florida
$20.14B
—
#17
Minnesota
$17.03B
—
#18
Oregon
$16.91B
—
#19
Louisiana
$16.09B
—
#20
South Carolina
$15.36B
—
#21
West Virginia
$15.08B
—
#22
Georgia
$14.05B
—
#23
North Carolina
$13.13B
—
#24
Hawaii
$11.72B
—
#25
Rhode Island · your comparison
$11.41B
—
#26
Alabama
$10.99B
—
#27
Oklahoma
$10.15B
—
#28
Kentucky
$10.08B
—
#29
Tennessee
$9.03B
—
#30
Indiana
$8.52B
—
#31
Iowa
$8.06B
—
#32
Arkansas
$8.05B
—
#33
Mississippi
$7.72B
—
#34
New Hampshire
$7.58B
—
#35
Kansas
$7.16B
—
#36
New Mexico
$7.12B
—
#37
Missouri
$6.99B
—
#38
Arizona
$6.88B
—
#39
Alaska
$5.72B
—
#40
Utah
$5.55B
—
#41
Maine
$5.3B
—
#42
North Dakota
$4.89B
—
#43
South Dakota
$4.67B
—
#44
Delaware
$3.69B
—
#45
Nebraska
$3.39B
—
#46
Nevada
$2.89B
—
#47
Montana
$2.76B
—
#48
Vermont
$2.67B
—
#49
Wyoming
$1.26B
—
#50
Idaho
$728.59M
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
All measures use Census state-government records for FY2024. Categories describe collections; they do not rank statutory tax rates.
Rhode Island · FY2024$1.63B
Rhode Island rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$465.4BSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
General sales-tax collections
Census category T09.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.
Lower value · $0Higher value · $54.35BStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Rhode Island · $1.63BFY2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
General sales-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
$54.35B
—
#2
California
$53.33B
—
#3
Florida
$40.09B
—
#4
Washington
$22.81B
—
#5
New York
$19.99B
—
#6
Ohio
$16.33B
—
#7
Illinois
$16.05B
—
#8
Pennsylvania
$15.6B
—
#9
New Jersey
$14.31B
—
#10
Tennessee
$14.08B
—
#11
Arizona
$13.16B
—
#12
Michigan
$12.7B
—
#13
North Carolina
$12.16B
—
#14
Indiana
$10.96B
—
#15
Massachusetts
$9.4B
—
#16
Georgia
$9.01B
—
#17
Minnesota
$8.49B
—
#18
Nevada
$8.4B
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7.59B
—
#20
Virginia
$7.4B
—
#21
Maryland
$6.85B
—
#22
South Carolina
$6.44B
—
#23
Connecticut
$6.23B
—
#24
Kentucky
$5.8B
—
#25
Missouri
$5.26B
—
#26
Mississippi
$5.07B
—
#27
Arkansas
$5.07B
—
#28
Louisiana
$4.87B
—
#29
Hawaii
$4.79B
—
#30
Colorado
$4.67B
—
#31
Iowa
$4.64B
—
#32
Utah
$4.63B
—
#33
Alabama
$4.59B
—
#34
Kansas
$4.33B
—
#35
New Mexico
$4.33B
—
#36
Oklahoma
$3.81B
—
#37
Idaho
$3.09B
—
#38
Nebraska
$2.97B
—
#39
Maine
$2.35B
—
#40
West Virginia
$1.82B
—
#41
South Dakota
$1.68B
—
#42
Rhode Island · your comparison
$1.63B
—
#43
Oregon
$1.34B
—
#44
North Dakota
$1.32B
—
#45
Wyoming
$1.01B
—
#46
Vermont
$597.33M
—
#47
Alaska
$0
—
#47
Delaware
$0
—
#47
Montana
$0
—
#47
New Hampshire
$0
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Census categories allow consistent comparisons. These selected categories are not a breakdown of the current Rhode Island appropriations act.
Rhode Island · FY2024$4.54B
Rhode Island rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$1.02TSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Public welfare current operations
Current operations for public welfare institutions and other public welfare, excluding capital and transfers.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.
Lower value · $1.09BHigher value · $156.71BStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Rhode Island · $4.54BFY2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Public welfare current operations · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
$156.71B
—
#2
New York
$97.35B
—
#3
Texas
$57.32B
—
#4
Illinois
$41.13B
—
#5
Florida
$40.11B
—
#6
Ohio
$39.77B
—
#7
Pennsylvania
$39.34B
—
#8
Massachusetts
$34.12B
—
#9
North Carolina
$30.64B
—
#10
New Jersey
$28.06B
—
#11
Arizona
$26.02B
—
#12
Michigan
$24.37B
—
#13
Virginia
$23.68B
—
#14
Minnesota
$23.37B
—
#15
Indiana
$22.93B
—
#16
Maryland
$21.61B
—
#17
Kentucky
$20.54B
—
#18
Oregon
$20.47B
—
#19
Washington
$19.6B
—
#20
Georgia
$18.99B
—
#21
Louisiana
$18.69B
—
#22
Tennessee
$16.42B
—
#23
Wisconsin
$16.26B
—
#24
Missouri
$15.65B
—
#25
Oklahoma
$14.57B
—
#26
Colorado
$13.6B
—
#27
South Carolina
$12.84B
—
#28
New Mexico
$10.72B
—
#29
Iowa
$10.26B
—
#30
Alabama
$9.73B
—
#31
Arkansas
$8.67B
—
#32
Mississippi
$8.08B
—
#33
Utah
$6.91B
—
#34
Kansas
$6.84B
—
#35
Nevada
$6.62B
—
#36
West Virginia
$6.24B
—
#37
Maine
$5.7B
—
#38
Nebraska
$4.97B
—
#39
Connecticut
$4.88B
—
#40
Rhode Island · your comparison
$4.54B
—
#41
Hawaii
$4.14B
—
#42
Delaware
$3.97B
—
#43
Idaho
$3.73B
—
#44
Alaska
$3.27B
—
#45
Montana
$2.89B
—
#46
New Hampshire
$2.72B
—
#47
Vermont
$2.69B
—
#48
North Dakota
$2.09B
—
#49
South Dakota
$1.95B
—
#50
Wyoming
$1.09B
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The enacted plan, spending categories and audited activity use different periods and accounting scopes; they are kept separate.
Rhode Island · FY2024$8.93B
Rhode Island rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$2.04TSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current operation expenditure
Sum of Census current-operation expenditure categories, excluding capital outlay, interest, and assistance/subsidy expenditure.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. This FY2024 comparison differs in scope and period from Rhode Island’s FY2027 appropriations and Fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 audit shown below.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Rhode Island stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Rhode Island has a dark outline.
Lower value · $4.01BHigher value · $287.03BStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Rhode Island · $8.93BFY2024 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Rhode Island with every state · 50 ranked
Current operation expenditure · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
California
$287.03B
—
#2
New York
$161.37B
—
#3
Texas
$136.18B
—
#4
Florida
$86.61B
—
#5
Pennsylvania
$77.15B
—
#6
Illinois
$75.67B
—
#7
Ohio
$66.77B
—
#8
New Jersey
$64.53B
—
#9
Massachusetts
$61.38B
—
#10
North Carolina
$59.01B
—
#11
Michigan
$57.27B
—
#12
Virginia
$53.45B
—
#13
Washington
$49.82B
—
#14
Georgia
$45.19B
—
#15
Maryland
$45.06B
—
#16
Oregon
$41.41B
—
#17
Arizona
$38.71B
—
#18
Minnesota
$38.1B
—
#19
Indiana
$37.4B
—
#20
Kentucky
$36.94B
—
#21
Wisconsin
$34.5B
—
#22
Missouri
$34.43B
—
#23
South Carolina
$32.85B
—
#24
Colorado
$32.73B
—
#25
Louisiana
$31.67B
—
#26
Tennessee
$31.12B
—
#27
Alabama
$26.99B
—
#28
Oklahoma
$24.28B
—
#29
Utah
$22.7B
—
#30
New Mexico
$21.94B
—
#31
Connecticut
$21.22B
—
#32
Iowa
$19.89B
—
#33
Kansas
$18.39B
—
#34
Hawaii
$16.62B
—
#35
Mississippi
$16.46B
—
#36
Arkansas
$16.28B
—
#37
West Virginia
$13.19B
—
#38
Nevada
$12.43B
—
#39
Nebraska
$10.41B
—
#40
Maine
$10.12B
—
#41
Delaware
$9.24B
—
#42
Rhode Island · your comparison
$8.93B
—
#43
Alaska
$8.4B
—
#44
Idaho
$8.21B
—
#45
New Hampshire
$7.12B
—
#46
Montana
$6.44B
—
#47
Vermont
$6.28B
—
#48
North Dakota
$5.63B
—
#49
South Dakota
$4.55B
—
#50
Wyoming
$4.01B
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
All FY2027 expenditures in the General Assembly's Budget as Enacted from general revenues, federal grants, restricted receipts, and other funds. The budget reflects remaining unspent American Rescue Plan fiscal-recovery and capital-project resources as described by House Fiscal Advisory Staff; appropriations are authority and do not mean every dollar will be spent during FY2027.
Shares of the $5.098 billion in tax revenue reported on Rhode Island's government-wide Statement of Activities. These are State primary-government taxes net of estimated refunds and uncollectible amounts; municipal property-tax collections are not consolidated into this State total.
The six official statewide function totals in the General Assembly's Budget as Enacted. The exact amounts reconcile to the $15.243 billion all-funds headline.
Government-wide revenue and expenses for Rhode Island's primary government on the accrual basis, combining governmental and business-type activities and excluding component units. Revenue is program revenue plus general revenue; transfers between the primary-government columns cancel.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
3 of 3 reviewed Rhode Island actions · newest first
Feb 9, 2026 · Executive Order 26-01 · Executive Order 26-01: Reducing Energy Costs and Improving Transparency For Ratepayers · IssuedGovernor · Executive Order 26-01
Executive Order 26-01: Reducing Energy Costs and Improving Transparency For Ratepayers
Feb 9, 2026 · Issued
Gov. Dan McKee · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Gov. Dan McKee issued Executive Order 26-01 directing the Office of Energy Resources, with named agencies and stakeholders, to review net metering and the Renewable Energy Growth Program. Virtual-net-metering budget amendment options were due to the governor and budget office by April 24, 2026, with proposed amendments transmitted to the legislative finance committees by May 1. The longer-term review is due October 1, 2026. The utility division must evaluate significant energy legislation and determine which proposals warrant an official Ratepayer Impact Note based on scope, potential ratepayer impact or legislative progress. It must develop an assessment framework, coordinate timely legislative access and publish plain-language impact summaries. These are review and reporting directives; meeting the deadlines, implementing changes and achieving projected savings are not established. The order does not itself lower electricity rates.
Instrument dated 2026-02-09; effective 2026-02-09 (Immediately). Original duration and conditions are stated in the summary. Continuing legal effect and implementation are not independently established by this relationship.
Why this record is included
The EIA fact measures retail electricity revenue per kilowatthour across sectors. Review of net-metering costs and legislative ratepayer impacts concerns rate components. An order to review and report does not itself set rates or establish savings. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Rhode Island evidence context: Average retail electricity price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DANIEL J. McKEE, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Governor of the State of Rhode Island, pursuant to Article IX of the Rhode Island Constitution and the Rhode Island General Laws, including, but not limited to, Title 30, Chapter 15, do hereby order and direct the following: 1. The Office of Energy Resources (OER), in consultation with the Division of Public Utilities and Carriers (DPUC), the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), the electric and gas distribution companies, and such additional stakeholders as OER deems appropriate, including representatives of labor, residential and commercial solar developers, and consumer interests, shall conduct a comprehensive review of the State's Net Metering Program (behind-the-meter and virtual) and Renewable Energy Growth Program. The purpose of this review is to control costs to electric ratepayers and ensure that these programs do not impose an undue or disproportionate financial burden on households and businesses, while remaining aligned with the State's emissions-reduction objectives. The review shall evaluate ratepayer impacts, state fiscal implications, and energy-system effects, and shall assess potential program modifications as appropriate. a. As part of this effort, OER shall submit supplemental budget article amendment options related to the State's virtual net metering program to the Governor's Office and the Office of Management and Budget (0MB) no later Executive Order 26-01 February 9, 2026 Page 3 than April 24, 2026. These options shall be designed to maintain ratepayer savings for households and businesses while updating the structure of the virtual net metering program. In developing these options, OER shall seek to avoid adverse impacts on existing solar projects and shall evaluate approaches used by peer states to maintain more cost-effective solar incentive programs. Any proposed supplemental budget article amendments shall be transmitted to the House and Senate Finance Committees no later than May 1, 2026. b. In addition, OER, in consultation with participating state agencies, shall complete a longer-term review of behind-the-meter net metering and the Renewable Energy Growth Program and deliver the results of that review—including key findings and potential policy and legislative options-to the Governor's Office and 0MB no later than October 1, 2026, aligned with the development and submission of agency budget proposals for the subsequent fiscal year. In conducting this review, OER and participating state agencies shall be advised by Dr. Noah Kaufman, Senior Research Scholar at Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy or other outside experts. 2. The DPUC shall evaluate and communicate the anticipated ratepayer impacts of all significant energy legislation under consideration by the General Assembly to ensure that policy makers, stakeholders, and the public have a clear and timely understanding of the potential effects of such proposals on utility rates, customer bills, and overall energy affordability. As part of this process, the DPUC shall determine which proposed energy legislation is sufficiently broad in scope, material in potential ratepayer impact, or sufficiently advanced in the legislative process to warrant the preparation of an official Ratepayer Impact Note. As part of this process, the DPUC shall: a. Develop an internal framework for preparing Ratepayer Impact Notes, that, to the extent practicable, assess expected impacts on electric and gas rates and typical customer bills, identify the duration of such impacts, describe key assumptions and uncertainties, and discuss the impacts across customer classes (where feasible), with particular attention to overall affordability. b. Establish a legislative notification and coordination process to ensure that Ratepayer Impact Notes are made available to the General Assembly, Executive Order 26-01 February 9, 2026 Page 4 including legislative leadership and relevant committees, in a timely manner to properly inform legislative deliberations on significant energy proposals. c. Establish a process to make available on its agency website plain-language impact summaries of such considered legislative proposals, with the goal of enabling every Rhode Island ratepayer to understand how proposed energy policies may affect utility bills and the cost of living. Order shall take effect immediately upon the date hereof.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 29, 2025 · H 5076 · MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE STATE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 278 · Without signatureRhode Island Legislature · H 5076
MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE STATE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2026
Jun 29, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 278 · Without signature
Rep. Marvin L. Abney · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Article 11, section 8 of the fiscal 2026 budget sets a 40-cent-per-gallon motor-fuel tax component for periods beginning July 1, 2025. Beginning July 1, 2027 and every other year thereafter, it requires CPI-U adjustments using the specified September 30 measurements from the two prior calendar years, rounded to the nearest cent, with a floor of 40 cents. This is not the total of all fuel taxes and fees or a verified eight-cent increase from the previously indexed rate. The budget became law without the governor’s signature on June 29, 2025; no signing credit is assigned. The connection is limited to this fuel-tax provision and does not establish a change in New England gasoline prices.
Chapter 278, became law without the governor’s signature 2025-06-29. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The gasoline fact is a six-state New England regional price proxy, not a Rhode Island-only price. A Rhode Island fuel-tax provision concerns one price component in one of those states; it does not establish regional prices or how much was passed through to consumers. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Rhode Island evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 8. Sections 31-36-7 and 31-36-20 of the General Laws in Chapter 31-36 entitled "Motor Fuel Tax" are hereby amended to read as follows: 31-36-7. Monthly report of distributors — Payment of tax. (a) State requirements. (1) Every distributor shall, on or before the twentieth (20th) day of each month, render a report to the tax administrator, upon forms to be obtained from the tax administrator, of the amount (number of gallons) of fuels purchased, sold, or used by the distributor within this state and the amount of fuels sold by the distributor without this state from fuels within this state during the preceding calendar month, and, if required by the tax administrator as to purchases, the name or names of the person or persons from whom purchased and the date and amount of each purchase, and as to sales, the name or names of the person or persons to whom sold and the amount of each sale, and shall pay at the same time to the administrator tax at the rate of thirty-two cents ($0.32) per gallon on all taxable gallons of fuel sold or used in this state for periods ending on or before June 30, 2025. (2) Every distributor shall, on or before the twentieth day of each month, render a report to the tax administrator, upon forms to be obtained from the tax administrator, of the amount (number of gallons) of fuels purchased, sold, or used by the distributor within this state and the amount of fuels sold by the distributor without this state from fuels within this state during the preceding calendar month, and, if required by the tax administrator as to purchases, the name or names of the person or persons from whom purchased and the date and amount of each purchase, and as to sales, the name or names of the person or persons to whom sold and the amount of each sale, and shall pay at the same time to the administrator, tax at the rate of forty cents ($0.40) per gallon on all taxable gallons of fuel sold or used in this state for periods beginning on or after July 1, 2025. (b) Federal requirements. In the event the federal government requires a certain portion of the gasoline tax to be dedicated for highway improvements, then the state controller is directed to establish a restricted receipt account and deposit that portion of gasoline tax receipts which brings the state into federal compliance. (1) Beginning July 1, 2015, and every other year thereafter, through June 30, 2025, the gasoline tax shall be adjusted by the percentage of increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics determined as of September 30 of the prior calendar year; said adjustment shall be rounded to the nearest one cent ($.01) increment, provided that the total tax shall not be less than provided for in section (a) (1). (2) Beginning July 1, 2027, and every other year thereafter, the gasoline tax shall be adjusted by the percentage of increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI- U) as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics determined as of September 30 of the two (2) prior calendar years; said adjustment shall be rounded to the nearest one cent ($0.01) increment; provided that, the total tax shall not be less than provided for in subsection (a) (2).
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 12, 2025 · S 2069 · Stabilize Medicaid and CHIP Coverage Act · In CongressU.S. Congress · Rhode Island delegation · S 2069
Stabilize Medicaid and CHIP Coverage Act
Jun 12, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse sponsored S. 2069. It proposes removing the under-19 limit from Medicaid’s 12-month continuous-enrollment provision and making corresponding CHIP changes, beginning in the first fiscal quarter on or after December 31, 2026. Other eligibility and statutory exceptions remain. The bill concerns continuity of insurance enrollment; no enactment or Rhode Island coverage increase was recorded by this review.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill recorded at review.
Why this record is included
The fact measures the uninsured share of residents under 65. Individual-market enrollment protections and Medicaid/CHIP continuous eligibility concern coverage for subsets of that population. Availability is not proof of enrollment or fewer uninsured residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Rhode Island evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Providing for 12-month continuous enrollment of individuals under the Medicaid program and Children’s Health Insurance Program(a)In generalSection 1902(e)(12) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(e)(12)), as amended by section 5112 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, is further amended—(1)in the header, by striking for children;(2)in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking who is under the age of 19 and;(3)in subparagraph (A), by adding or at the end;(4)by striking subparagraph (B); and(5)by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B).(b)CHIPSection 2107(e)(1)(K) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397gg(e)(1)(K)), as amended by section 5112 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, is further amended—(1)by striking for children;(2)by striking a targeted low-income child and inserting an individual; and(3)by striking child becomes and inserting individual becomes.(c)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall take effect on the first day of the first fiscal quarter that begins on or after December 31, 2026.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Rhode Island officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt from FactVote’s Rhode Island candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
7 statements from 5 candidates
2026 Rhode Island Governor — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements
The plan includes targeted tax relief, reducing hidden fees, and cutting wasteful government spending. “We will put money back where it belongs—in the pockets of hardworking families.”
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering Taxes and Fees for Working Families
Candidate campaign source
The plan includes targeted tax relief, reducing hidden fees, and cutting wasteful government spending. “We will put money back where it belongs—in the pockets of hardworking families.”
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Using his hard-earned know-how and seats on the powerful Appropriations and Armed Services Committees, Jack Reed is leading the fight in the Senate against Donald Trump’s outrageous abuses of power and dangerous military policies that are weakening our national security.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: National security, foreign policy, and veterans
Candidate campaign source
Using his hard-earned know-how and seats on the powerful Appropriations and Armed Services Committees, Jack Reed is leading the fight in the Senate against Donald Trump’s outrageous abuses of power and dangerous military policies that are weakening our national security.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Rhode Island was founded on religious liberty. Faith is something most humans have in some way or another. Michael believes that our different beliefs should be talked about in honest respectful ways by everyone, including politicians. He also believes that open discussion about different faith issu…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Platform for Rhode Island
Candidate campaign source
Rhode Island was founded on religious liberty. Faith is something most humans have in some way or another. Michael believes that our different beliefs should be talked about in honest respectful ways by everyone, including politicians. He also believes that open discussion about different faith issues can and should contribute to how policy is formed and how budgets are formulated. The goal should always be to make our state, our nation and our world more merciful and just.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
This section matches specific budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt terms in retained, attributed source text from published Rhode Island candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Rhode Island incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Rhode Island legislators and Rhode Island’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Rhode Island’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
2 matching sponsorships or proposals · 2 Rhode Island incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Marvin L. Abney
Rhode Island House, District 73 · D–RI
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Marvin L. AbneyRhode Island Legislature · H 5076
MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE STATE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2026
Jun 29, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 278 · Without signature
Rep. Marvin L. Abney · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Article 11, section 8 of the fiscal 2026 budget sets a 40-cent-per-gallon motor-fuel tax component for periods beginning July 1, 2025. Beginning July 1, 2027 and every other year thereafter, it requires CPI-U adjustments using the specified September 30 measurements from the two prior calendar years, rounded to the nearest cent, with a floor of 40 cents. This is not the total of all fuel taxes and fees or a verified eight-cent increase from the previously indexed rate. The budget became law without the governor’s signature on June 29, 2025; no signing credit is assigned. The connection is limited to this fuel-tax provision and does not establish a change in New England gasoline prices.
Chapter 278, became law without the governor’s signature 2025-06-29. Enactment, scheduled effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The gasoline fact is a six-state New England regional price proxy, not a Rhode Island-only price. A Rhode Island fuel-tax provision concerns one price component in one of those states; it does not establish regional prices or how much was passed through to consumers. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Rhode Island evidence context: New England regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
SECTION 8. Sections 31-36-7 and 31-36-20 of the General Laws in Chapter 31-36 entitled "Motor Fuel Tax" are hereby amended to read as follows: 31-36-7. Monthly report of distributors — Payment of tax. (a) State requirements. (1) Every distributor shall, on or before the twentieth (20th) day of each month, render a report to the tax administrator, upon forms to be obtained from the tax administrator, of the amount (number of gallons) of fuels purchased, sold, or used by the distributor within this state and the amount of fuels sold by the distributor without this state from fuels within this state during the preceding calendar month, and, if required by the tax administrator as to purchases, the name or names of the person or persons from whom purchased and the date and amount of each purchase, and as to sales, the name or names of the person or persons to whom sold and the amount of each sale, and shall pay at the same time to the administrator tax at the rate of thirty-two cents ($0.32) per gallon on all taxable gallons of fuel sold or used in this state for periods ending on or before June 30, 2025. (2) Every distributor shall, on or before the twentieth day of each month, render a report to the tax administrator, upon forms to be obtained from the tax administrator, of the amount (number of gallons) of fuels purchased, sold, or used by the distributor within this state and the amount of fuels sold by the distributor without this state from fuels within this state during the preceding calendar month, and, if required by the tax administrator as to purchases, the name or names of the person or persons from whom purchased and the date and amount of each purchase, and as to sales, the name or names of the person or persons to whom sold and the amount of each sale, and shall pay at the same time to the administrator, tax at the rate of forty cents ($0.40) per gallon on all taxable gallons of fuel sold or used in this state for periods beginning on or after July 1, 2025. (b) Federal requirements. In the event the federal government requires a certain portion of the gasoline tax to be dedicated for highway improvements, then the state controller is directed to establish a restricted receipt account and deposit that portion of gasoline tax receipts which brings the state into federal compliance. (1) Beginning July 1, 2015, and every other year thereafter, through June 30, 2025, the gasoline tax shall be adjusted by the percentage of increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics determined as of September 30 of the prior calendar year; said adjustment shall be rounded to the nearest one cent ($.01) increment, provided that the total tax shall not be less than provided for in section (a) (1). (2) Beginning July 1, 2027, and every other year thereafter, the gasoline tax shall be adjusted by the percentage of increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI- U) as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics determined as of September 30 of the two (2) prior calendar years; said adjustment shall be rounded to the nearest one cent ($0.01) increment; provided that, the total tax shall not be less than provided for in subsection (a) (2).
1 proposalView proposals from Sen. Sheldon WhitehouseU.S. Congress · Rhode Island delegation · S 2069
Stabilize Medicaid and CHIP Coverage Act
Jun 12, 2025 · In Congress
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse sponsored S. 2069. It proposes removing the under-19 limit from Medicaid’s 12-month continuous-enrollment provision and making corresponding CHIP changes, beginning in the first fiscal quarter on or after December 31, 2026. Other eligibility and statutory exceptions remain. The bill concerns continuity of insurance enrollment; no enactment or Rhode Island coverage increase was recorded by this review.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. No enactment of this bill recorded at review.
Why this record is included
The fact measures the uninsured share of residents under 65. Individual-market enrollment protections and Medicaid/CHIP continuous eligibility concern coverage for subsets of that population. Availability is not proof of enrollment or fewer uninsured residents. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Rhode Island evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Providing for 12-month continuous enrollment of individuals under the Medicaid program and Children’s Health Insurance Program(a)In generalSection 1902(e)(12) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(e)(12)), as amended by section 5112 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, is further amended—(1)in the header, by striking for children;(2)in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking who is under the age of 19 and;(3)in subparagraph (A), by adding or at the end;(4)by striking subparagraph (B); and(5)by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B).(b)CHIPSection 2107(e)(1)(K) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397gg(e)(1)(K)), as amended by section 5112 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, is further amended—(1)by striking for children;(2)by striking a targeted low-income child and inserting an individual; and(3)by striking child becomes and inserting individual becomes.(c)Effective dateThe amendments made by this section shall take effect on the first day of the first fiscal quarter that begins on or after December 31, 2026.
Only current Rhode Island officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Rhode Island statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Rhode Island snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Rhode Island, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.