Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.
Uninsured rate · all ages6.7%2024 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 658.1%2024 · #30 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6570.8%2024 · #28 of 50 · highest first
Ohio over time
Explore Ohio readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Ohio officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Ohio effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Ohio change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Uninsured rate · all ages Ohio · source units
OhioPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
180 of 180 reviewed Ohio actions match · 114 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.
Ohio · 2024: 6.7% · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Ohio · state comparison
Who has health coverage?
Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.
Ohio · 20246.7%
Ohio rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Uninsured rate · all ages
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.
ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Ohio
2024 · Ohio: 6.7% · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Ohio Uninsured rate · all ages history
Period
Ohio
Compare
2014
8.4%
2015
6.5%
2016
5.6%
2017
6%
2018
6.5%
2019
6.6%
2020
Not available
2021
6.5%
2022
5.9%
2023
6.1%
2024
6.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 6.7%2024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
16.7%
—
#2
Georgia
12%
—
#3
Oklahoma
11.5%
—
#4
Nevada
11.4%
—
#5
Alaska
11%
—
#6
Florida
10.9%
—
#7
Arizona
10.3%
—
#7
Wyoming
10.3%
—
#9
New Mexico
10.1%
—
#10
Mississippi
9.7%
—
#10
Tennessee
9.7%
—
#12
Arkansas
9.4%
—
#13
Idaho
9.2%
—
#14
South Carolina
9%
—
#15
Montana
8.8%
—
#16
North Carolina
8.6%
—
#17
Kansas
8.5%
—
#18
Utah
8.3%
—
#19
Alabama
8.2%
—
#20
South Dakota
8.1%
—
#21
Colorado
7.9%
—
#22
Louisiana
7.7%
—
#22
Missouri
7.7%
—
#22
New Jersey
7.7%
—
#25
Indiana
7.5%
—
#26
Nebraska
7.1%
—
#27
Delaware
6.9%
—
#27
Illinois
6.9%
—
#27
Virginia
6.9%
—
#30
Kentucky
6.8%
—
#31
Ohio · your comparison
6.7%
—
#32
Washington
6.5%
—
#33
Maryland
6.3%
—
#34
North Dakota
6.1%
—
#35
California
5.9%
—
#36
Connecticut
5.8%
—
#36
Pennsylvania
5.8%
—
#36
West Virginia
5.8%
—
#39
Maine
5.5%
—
#40
Iowa
5.4%
—
#41
Wisconsin
5.3%
—
#42
Oregon
5.2%
—
#43
Michigan
5.1%
—
#43
Minnesota
5.1%
—
#45
New York
5%
—
#46
Rhode Island
4.6%
—
#47
New Hampshire
4.5%
—
#48
Vermont
4.2%
—
#49
Hawaii
3.5%
—
#50
Massachusetts
2.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Ohio with every state.
Ohio · 2020$10,478
Ohio rank#21among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal healthcare spending per resident
Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.
2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Ohio
2020 · Ohio: $10,478 · Rank #21 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Ohio Personal healthcare spending per resident history
Period
Ohio
Compare
2014
$8,401
2015
$8,754
2016
$9,062
2017
$9,400
2018
$9,627
2019
$10,173
2020
$10,478
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · $10,4782020 · Rank #21 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$14,007
—
#2
Alaska
$13,642
—
#3
Massachusetts
$13,319
—
#4
Delaware
$12,899
—
#5
West Virginia
$12,769
—
#6
Vermont
$12,756
—
#7
South Dakota
$12,495
—
#8
Connecticut
$12,489
—
#9
Maine
$12,077
—
#10
New Jersey
$11,868
—
#11
New Hampshire
$11,793
—
#12
Rhode Island
$11,694
—
#13
Pennsylvania
$11,603
—
#14
North Dakota
$11,301
—
#15
Wyoming
$10,989
—
#16
Minnesota
$10,846
—
#17
Maryland
$10,839
—
#18
Indiana
$10,517
—
#19
Louisiana
$10,515
—
#20
Nebraska
$10,514
—
#21
Ohio · your comparison
$10,478
—
#22
California
$10,299
—
#23
Hawaii
$10,291
—
#24
Kentucky
$10,257
—
#25
Montana
$10,212
—
#26
Illinois
$10,190
—
#27
Oregon
$10,071
—
#28
Wisconsin
$9,982
—
#29
Missouri
$9,921
—
#30
Michigan
$9,897
—
#31
Florida
$9,865
—
#32
Iowa
$9,789
—
#33
Oklahoma
$9,444
—
#34
Kansas
$9,408
—
#35
Mississippi
$9,394
—
#36
Arkansas
$9,338
—
#37
Tennessee
$9,336
—
#38
Alabama
$9,280
—
#39
Washington
$9,265
—
#40
Virginia
$9,195
—
#41
North Carolina
$8,917
—
#42
New Mexico
$8,902
—
#43
South Carolina
$8,766
—
#44
Georgia
$8,758
—
#45
Arizona
$8,756
—
#46
Colorado
$8,583
—
#47
Texas
$8,406
—
#48
Nevada
$8,348
—
#49
Idaho
$8,148
—
#50
Utah
$7,522
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.
Ohio · 202275.6 years
Ohio rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Life expectancy at birth
FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Ohio population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.
The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Ohio
2022 · Ohio: 75.6 years · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Ohio Life expectancy at birth history
Period
Ohio
Compare
2018
76.8 years
2019
76.9 years
2020
75.3 years
2021
74.5 years
2022
75.6 years
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 75.6 years2022 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
80 years
—
#2
Massachusetts
79.8 years
—
#3
New Jersey
79.6 years
—
#4
New York
79.5 years
—
#5
Connecticut
79.4 years
—
#6
California
79.3 years
—
#6
Minnesota
79.3 years
—
#8
Rhode Island
79.2 years
—
#9
Utah
79 years
—
#10
New Hampshire
78.7 years
—
#11
Colorado
78.5 years
—
#12
Idaho
78.4 years
—
#12
Washington
78.4 years
—
#14
Nebraska
78.3 years
—
#14
Vermont
78.3 years
—
#16
Wisconsin
78.1 years
—
#17
Florida
77.9 years
—
#17
Iowa
77.9 years
—
#17
North Dakota
77.9 years
—
#20
Maryland
77.8 years
—
#21
Oregon
77.7 years
—
#22
Illinois
77.5 years
—
#22
Virginia
77.5 years
—
#24
Montana
77.3 years
—
#24
Pennsylvania
77.3 years
—
#24
South Dakota
77.3 years
—
#27
Texas
77.1 years
—
#28
Michigan
76.8 years
—
#28
Wyoming
76.8 years
—
#30
Arizona
76.7 years
—
#31
Maine
76.6 years
—
#32
Delaware
76.5 years
—
#32
Kansas
76.5 years
—
#34
Nevada
76.4 years
—
#35
Georgia
75.9 years
—
#35
North Carolina
75.9 years
—
#37
Alaska
75.8 years
—
#38
Ohio · your comparison
75.6 years
—
#39
Indiana
75.4 years
—
#40
Missouri
75.2 years
—
#41
South Carolina
75.1 years
—
#42
New Mexico
74.5 years
—
#43
Arkansas
73.9 years
—
#44
Alabama
73.8 years
—
#44
Louisiana
73.8 years
—
#44
Oklahoma
73.8 years
—
#44
Tennessee
73.8 years
—
#48
Kentucky
73.6 years
—
#49
Mississippi
72.6 years
—
#50
West Virginia
72.2 years
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.
Ohio · 202311.5%
Ohio rank#10among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted
Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.
Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Ohio
2023 · Ohio: 11.5% · Rank #10 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Ohio Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
Period
Ohio
Compare
2019
10.4%
2020
11%
2021
11%
2022
11.4%
2023
11.5%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 11.5%2023 · Rank #10 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 10.8% – 12.2%Selected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Mississippi
15.1%
95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1
West Virginia
15.1%
95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3
Louisiana
14.6%
95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4
Alabama
14%
95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5
Arkansas
13.1%
95% CI: 12–14.3
#6
South Carolina
12.7%
95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6
Tennessee
12.7%
95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8
Texas
12.1%
95% CI: 11–13.3
#9
Indiana
11.7%
95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10
Georgia
11.5%
95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10
Ohio · your comparison
11.5%
95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12
Oklahoma
11.3%
95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13
Delaware
11.1%
95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14
North Carolina
11%
95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15
Illinois
10.9%
95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15
Maryland
10.9%
95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15
Michigan
10.9%
95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18
Nevada
10.8%
95% CI: 8.9–13
#18
New Mexico
10.8%
95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20
Missouri
10.7%
95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20
South Dakota
10.7%
95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22
California
10.6%
95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23
Kansas
10.5%
95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24
Virginia
10.4%
95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25
Florida
10.1%
95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26
Rhode Island
10%
95% CI: 9.1–11
#27
Arizona
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27
Iowa
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29
Nebraska
9.7%
95% CI: 9–10.3
#30
Wisconsin
9.6%
95% CI: 9–10.2
#31
Hawaii
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31
New York
9.5%
95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31
Oregon
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34
Wyoming
9.4%
95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35
Minnesota
9.3%
95% CI: 8.6–10
#36
New Jersey
9.1%
95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37
Maine
9%
95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38
North Dakota
8.9%
95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39
Idaho
8.7%
95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40
Washington
8.6%
95% CI: 8.2–9
#41
Massachusetts
8.5%
95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42
Connecticut
8.4%
95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43
Alaska
8.2%
95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44
Utah
8.1%
95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45
Colorado
8%
95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46
Montana
7.9%
95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46
New Hampshire
7.9%
95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48
Vermont
7.8%
95% CI: 7–8.7
—
Kentucky
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Pennsylvania
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.
Ohio · June 30, 202649.7%
Ohio rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Primary care · need met
HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.
National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 49.7%June 30, 2026 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Jersey
83.2%
—
#2
Vermont
82.6%
—
#3
South Carolina
79.4%
—
#4
New Hampshire
74.8%
—
#5
Rhode Island
74.3%
—
#6
Louisiana
72.1%
—
#7
Hawaii
67.1%
—
#8
Utah
65.4%
—
#9
Wisconsin
65.2%
—
#10
Alabama
63%
—
#11
Connecticut
60.3%
—
#12
Massachusetts
58%
—
#13
Tennessee
58%
—
#14
Virginia
57.2%
—
#15
Pennsylvania
56.7%
—
#16
Maine
56%
—
#17
Minnesota
55.4%
—
#18
Wyoming
54.4%
—
#19
Indiana
54.2%
—
#20
California
53.2%
—
#21
Arkansas
52.6%
—
#22
Texas
49.8%
—
#23
Ohio · your comparison
49.7%
—
#24
Nebraska
49.1%
—
#25
Alaska
48.9%
—
#26
North Carolina
48.1%
—
#27
Colorado
47.5%
—
#28
Michigan
44.9%
—
#29
Oregon
43.9%
—
#30
Idaho
43.9%
—
#31
Washington
42.4%
—
#32
Illinois
41.5%
—
#33
Nevada
41.5%
—
#34
Arizona
41.2%
—
#35
Kansas
41.1%
—
#36
Iowa
40.5%
—
#37
Florida
39.7%
—
#38
Georgia
39.1%
—
#39
Montana
38.5%
—
#40
West Virginia
38.3%
—
#41
North Dakota
36.5%
—
#42
New York
35.3%
—
#43
South Dakota
34.6%
—
#44
Mississippi
34.1%
—
#45
Maryland
31.6%
—
#46
New Mexico
31.4%
—
#47
Kentucky
30.8%
—
#48
Oklahoma
28.6%
—
#49
Missouri
23.7%
—
#50
Delaware
11.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.
Ohio · 2020$6,989
Ohio rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Single coverage premium · all firms
Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.
Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · $6,9892020 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alaska
$8,635
—
#2
New York
$8,177
—
#3
New Hampshire
$7,991
—
#4
Vermont
$7,868
—
#5
Wyoming
$7,743
—
#6
Nebraska
$7,611
—
#7
South Carolina
$7,516
—
#8
Connecticut
$7,501
—
#9
Maine
$7,496
—
#10
Massachusetts
$7,452
—
#11
Washington
$7,440
—
#12
New Mexico
$7,424
—
#13
Illinois
$7,376
—
#14
New Jersey
$7,373
—
#15
Maryland
$7,352
—
#16
Rhode Island
$7,326
—
#17
Indiana
$7,319
—
#18
Delaware
$7,280
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7,250
—
#20
Pennsylvania
$7,246
—
#21
North Dakota
$7,216
—
#22
Colorado
$7,206
—
#23
Missouri
$7,179
—
#24
California
$7,173
—
#25
Florida
$7,078
—
#26
South Dakota
$7,070
—
#27
Oklahoma
$7,058
—
#28
Hawaii
$7,040
—
#29
North Carolina
$7,036
—
#30
Texas
$7,017
—
#31
West Virginia
$6,993
—
#32
Ohio · your comparison
$6,989
—
#33
Kentucky
$6,949
—
#34
Iowa
$6,932
—
#35
Virginia
$6,928
—
#36
Oregon
$6,917
—
#37
Minnesota
$6,910
—
#38
Georgia
$6,876
—
#39
Montana
$6,860
—
#40
Idaho
$6,744
—
#41
Louisiana
$6,713
—
#42
Michigan
$6,683
—
#43
Kansas
$6,675
—
#44
Arizona
$6,612
—
#45
Utah
$6,593
—
#46
Mississippi
$6,561
—
#47
Nevada
$6,493
—
#48
Tennessee
$6,485
—
#49
Arkansas
$6,414
—
#50
Alabama
$6,393
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.
Ohio · 2023–202423.9%
Ohio rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+
Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.
Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 23.9%2023–2024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Oregon
31.6%
—
#2
Vermont
29.1%
—
#3
West Virginia
28.1%
—
#4
Washington
27.9%
—
#5
New Hampshire
27.7%
—
#6
Tennessee
27%
—
#7
Utah
26.7%
—
#8
Maine
26.7%
—
#9
Arkansas
26.6%
—
#10
Colorado
26.4%
—
#11
Rhode Island
25.8%
—
#12
Missouri
25.7%
—
#13
Montana
25.6%
—
#14
Indiana
25.3%
—
#15
Kentucky
25.3%
—
#16
Georgia
25.2%
—
#17
Iowa
25%
—
#18
Massachusetts
24.9%
—
#19
Wyoming
24.7%
—
#20
Nevada
24.6%
—
#21
Arizona
24.6%
—
#22
Wisconsin
24.6%
—
#23
Idaho
24.5%
—
#24
Nebraska
24.1%
—
#25
Louisiana
24.1%
—
#26
Alaska
24%
—
#27
Pennsylvania
23.9%
—
#28
New Mexico
23.9%
—
#28
Ohio · your comparison
23.9%
—
#30
Connecticut
23.7%
—
#31
Kansas
23.7%
—
#32
Michigan
23.6%
—
#33
Virginia
23.1%
—
#34
Alabama
23%
—
#35
North Dakota
23%
—
#36
Maryland
22.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
22.6%
—
#38
Minnesota
22.6%
—
#39
Illinois
22.2%
—
#40
Delaware
22.1%
—
#41
New York
21.9%
—
#42
South Dakota
21.8%
—
#43
California
21.6%
—
#44
North Carolina
21.4%
—
#45
Florida
20.8%
—
#46
Texas
20.7%
—
#47
Mississippi
20.5%
—
#48
Hawaii
19.8%
—
#49
South Carolina
19.8%
—
#50
New Jersey
18.1%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
180 of 180 reviewed Ohio actions · newest first
Sep 7, 2026 · HB 31 · Require electronic recordings of all parole board hearings · EffectiveOhio Legislature · HB 31
Require electronic recordings of all parole board hearings
Sep 7, 2026 · Effective
Rep. Latyna M. Humphrey · Sponsored / Rep. Brian Stewart · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would require electronic recordings to be made of certain parole board hearings; make electronic recordings of full parole board hearings public records; and provide the prosecuting attorney access to Department of Rehabilitation and Correction health care records for certain parole and judicial release cases.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on September 7, 2026: Effective.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses incarceration, sentencing, correctional custody, release, supervision, or reentry. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's state-prison population.
Retained Ohio evidence context: People in Ohio state prisons. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend sections 149.43, 2929.20, 5120.115, 5120.21, 5149.10, and 5149.101 and to enact section 5149.102 of the Revised Code to require electronic recordings to be made of certain parole board hearings, to make electronic recordings of full parole board hearings public records, and to provide the prosecuting attorney access to Department of Rehabilitation and Correction health care records for certain parole and judicial release cases.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 3, 2026 · HB 956 · Impose insurance requirements on certain Medicaid providers · Referred to committee — InsuranceOhio Legislature · HB 956
Impose insurance requirements on certain Medicaid providers
Jun 3, 2026 · Referred to committee — Insurance
Rep. Jason Stephens · Sponsored / Rep. Tim Barhorst · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on June 3, 2026: Referred to committee — Insurance.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To enact sections 5164.40 and 5164.41 of the Revised Code to impose insurance requirements on certain Medicaid providers.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 20, 2026 · HB 871 · Designate Gun Violence Awareness Month · Referred to committee — General GovernmentOhio Legislature · HB 871
Designate Gun Violence Awareness Month
May 20, 2026 · Referred to committee — General Government
Rep. Darnell T. Brewer · Sponsored / Rep. Dontavius L. Jarrells · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on May 20, 2026: Referred to committee — General Government.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To enact section 5.22101 of the Revised Code to designate June as "Gun Violence Awareness Month."
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 20, 2026 · HB 899 · Require foster caregivers to securely store firearms · Referred to committee — Public SafetyOhio Legislature · HB 899
Require foster caregivers to securely store firearms
May 20, 2026 · Referred to committee — Public Safety
Rep. Darnell T. Brewer · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would require foster caregivers to securely store firearms.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on May 20, 2026: Referred to committee — Public Safety.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend section 149.43 and to enact section 5103.164 of the Revised Code to require foster caregivers to securely store firearms.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 20, 2026 · HB 872 · Establish Economic Task Force on Gun Violence and Violent Crimes · Referred to committee — Public SafetyOhio Legislature · HB 872
Establish Economic Task Force on Gun Violence and Violent Crimes
May 20, 2026 · Referred to committee — Public Safety
The bill would establish the Ohio Economic Task Force on Gun Violence and Violent Crimes to study the impact of gun violence and other violent crimes on Ohio businesses.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on May 20, 2026: Referred to committee — Public Safety.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To establish the Ohio Economic Task Force on Gun Violence and Violent Crimes to study the impact of gun violence and other violent crimes on Ohio businesses.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 20, 2026 · HB 928 · Expand prohibitions on abortion trafficking · Referred to committee — JudiciaryOhio Legislature · HB 928
Expand prohibitions on abortion trafficking
May 20, 2026 · Referred to committee — Judiciary
Rep. Josh Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would expand the prohibitions on abortion trafficking and the sale of a product of human conception resulting from abortion.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on May 20, 2026: Referred to committee — Judiciary.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's reported induced-abortion count.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Induced abortions reported in Ohio. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend sections 2108.18, 2108.99, and 2919.14 of the Revised Code to expand the prohibitions on abortion trafficking and the sale of a product of human conception resulting from abortion.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Ohio officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Ohio candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
105 statements from 30 candidates
2026 Ohio Attorney General — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements
Health insurance is a business, and Keith Faber believes that profit isn’t a dirty word in Ohio. However, Ohioans also deserve to get what they pay for. Keith Faber will make sure the Attorney General’s office is in their corner when an insurer improperly says no.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The Health Insurance Denial Resolution Program
Candidate campaign source
Health insurance is a business, and Keith Faber believes that profit isn’t a dirty word in Ohio. However, Ohioans also deserve to get what they pay for. Keith Faber will make sure the Attorney General’s office is in their corner when an insurer improperly says no.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
BACKGROUND: Health care costs keep climbing, and too many Ohio families pay their premiums every month only to open a denial letter when they get hurt or sick and need care most. The medical claim denial process is confusing, time-consuming, and like trying to see inside a black box. Most patients n…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The Health Insurance Denial Resolution Program
Candidate campaign source
BACKGROUND: Health care costs keep climbing, and too many Ohio families pay their premiums every month only to open a denial letter when they get hurt or sick and need care most. The medical claim denial process is confusing, time-consuming, and like trying to see inside a black box. Most patients never think to appeal a denial, even though Ohio law already gives them the right to an internal appeal and an independent external review. Furthermore, appeals frequently succeed. But what happens most often is that families give up, pay out of pocket, or go without the treatment they’ve already paid for through their premiums. That’s an affordability and fairness problem the Attorney General can do something about.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Keith will take on Ohio’s drug epidemic by reducing demand through addiction treatment services, prosecuting suppliers, cutting off supply chains at the border, and supporting recovery efforts for victims. He will address the impact of illegal immigration and cartel activity on Ohio communities by s…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Drug enforcement, treatment, and border security
Candidate campaign source
Keith will take on Ohio’s drug epidemic by reducing demand through addiction treatment services, prosecuting suppliers, cutting off supply chains at the border, and supporting recovery efforts for victims. He will address the impact of illegal immigration and cartel activity on Ohio communities by supporting President Trump’s strict border security policies. Keith is committed to protecting Ohio neighborhoods from rising crime and the economic challenges caused by unchecked migration.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
As governor, I will protect against attacks on Medicaid and Medicare from Columbus and Washington by helping Ohioans enroll and stay on Medicaid by eliminating unnecessary red tape, shortening approval wait times and eliminating the waste, fraud and abuse that drives up costs and jeopardizes Ohioans…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering the Cost of Health Care
Candidate campaign source
As governor, I will protect against attacks on Medicaid and Medicare from Columbus and Washington by helping Ohioans enroll and stay on Medicaid by eliminating unnecessary red tape, shortening approval wait times and eliminating the waste, fraud and abuse that drives up costs and jeopardizes Ohioans’ care.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Eric and I have had to balance the demands of caring for aging family members while raising children, and we understand how difficult this is for working families. My opponent’s pals in Congress voted overwhelmingly to cut Medicaid benefits for home and community-based services, but I believe that w…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Aging in place
Candidate campaign source
Eric and I have had to balance the demands of caring for aging family members while raising children, and we understand how difficult this is for working families. My opponent’s pals in Congress voted overwhelmingly to cut Medicaid benefits for home and community-based services, but I believe that we need to support families and caregivers as they help our seniors age in place, at home. We can’t sit idly by; we must invest in career pathways and training for our long-term care workforce, who staff assisted living and nursing home facilities, to keep up with greater demand as Ohioans age.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
I’ll reduce prescription drug prices by launching Ohio Rx, an online platform that will leverage Ohio’s purchasing power from its Medicaid single pharmacy benefit manager to drive down drug prices for all Ohioans. I will also push to require that out-of-pocket purchases for medication counts towards…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering the Cost of Health Care
Candidate campaign source
I’ll reduce prescription drug prices by launching Ohio Rx, an online platform that will leverage Ohio’s purchasing power from its Medicaid single pharmacy benefit manager to drive down drug prices for all Ohioans. I will also push to require that out-of-pocket purchases for medication counts towards Ohioans’ health insurance deductibles.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Too many Ohioans are facing skyrocketing insurance premiums, and having to choose between putting other necessities on hold or forgoing insurance altogether. As governor, I will work to bring far more transparency to insurance and hospital pricing, lower healthcare premiums in the process, and suppo…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering the Cost of Health Care
Candidate campaign source
Too many Ohioans are facing skyrocketing insurance premiums, and having to choose between putting other necessities on hold or forgoing insurance altogether. As governor, I will work to bring far more transparency to insurance and hospital pricing, lower healthcare premiums in the process, and support small businesses in covering their employees. I will strengthen Ohio’s efforts to crack down on surprise billing and build on the bipartisan effort to end predatory collection practices that only hurt Ohio families.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
As governor, I will prioritize community partnership with law enforcement, fully fund our local law enforcement, support our first responders and invest in addiction treatment, mental health services and community programming across our state.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Building Safer Communities
Candidate campaign source
As governor, I will prioritize community partnership with law enforcement, fully fund our local law enforcement, support our first responders and invest in addiction treatment, mental health services and community programming across our state.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We are all just one healthcare disaster away from losing everything. No one should go bankrupt because of a necessary medical procedure, but I’ve heard far too many stories from Ohioans who have experienced this.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering the Cost of Health Care
Candidate campaign source
We are all just one healthcare disaster away from losing everything. No one should go bankrupt because of a necessary medical procedure, but I’ve heard far too many stories from Ohioans who have experienced this.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
The commitment of this campaign is an Ohio for everyone and for anyone. Whether you want to live in suburbia, a small Ohio village, an urban metropolis, rural Ohio, or Appalachian Ohio; we want to make it a place that is affordable, accessible, and healthy. You should be able to live in these places…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A Healthy, Affordable, and Desirable Ohio for Everyone+
Candidate campaign source
The commitment of this campaign is an Ohio for everyone and for anyone. Whether you want to live in suburbia, a small Ohio village, an urban metropolis, rural Ohio, or Appalachian Ohio; we want to make it a place that is affordable, accessible, and healthy. You should be able to live in these places and still have ready access to a job, to education, to healthcare, to nature, to stores and entertainment, to healthy food. You should be able to walk around where you live. You shouldn’t have to suffer crime or pollution. You should be able to live the life you want.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Eric and I have had to balance the demands of caring for aging family members while raising children, and we understand how difficult this is for working families. My opponent’s pals in Congress voted overwhelmingly to cut Medicaid benefits for home and community-based services, but I believe that w…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Aging in place
Candidate campaign source
Eric and I have had to balance the demands of caring for aging family members while raising children, and we understand how difficult this is for working families. My opponent’s pals in Congress voted overwhelmingly to cut Medicaid benefits for home and community-based services, but I believe that we need to support families and caregivers as they help our seniors age in place, at home. We can’t sit idly by; we must invest in career pathways and training for our long-term care workforce, who staff assisted living and nursing home facilities, to keep up with greater demand as Ohioans age.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
As governor, I will protect against attacks on Medicaid and Medicare from Columbus and Washington by helping Ohioans enroll and stay on Medicaid by eliminating unnecessary red tape, shortening approval wait times and eliminating the waste, fraud and abuse that drives up costs and jeopardizes Ohioans…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering the Cost of Health Care
Candidate campaign source
As governor, I will protect against attacks on Medicaid and Medicare from Columbus and Washington by helping Ohioans enroll and stay on Medicaid by eliminating unnecessary red tape, shortening approval wait times and eliminating the waste, fraud and abuse that drives up costs and jeopardizes Ohioans’ care.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
I’ll reduce prescription drug prices by launching Ohio Rx, an online platform that will leverage Ohio’s purchasing power from its Medicaid single pharmacy benefit manager to drive down drug prices for all Ohioans. I will also push to require that out-of-pocket purchases for medication counts towards…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering the Cost of Health Care
Candidate campaign source
I’ll reduce prescription drug prices by launching Ohio Rx, an online platform that will leverage Ohio’s purchasing power from its Medicaid single pharmacy benefit manager to drive down drug prices for all Ohioans. I will also push to require that out-of-pocket purchases for medication counts towards Ohioans’ health insurance deductibles.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
As a doctor, I’ve seen firsthand how important it is that Ohioans can both access and afford the care they need — and how right now, that simply isn’t the case for so many people in our state. Ohioans are struggling; more than 160,000 people dropped their healthcare coverage through the ACA since 20…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Acton–Pepper Shared Ticket Priorities
Candidate campaign source
As a doctor, I’ve seen firsthand how important it is that Ohioans can both access and afford the care they need — and how right now, that simply isn’t the case for so many people in our state. Ohioans are struggling; more than 160,000 people dropped their healthcare coverage through the ACA since 2025, 11 rural hospitals are at risk of closure, and prescription drug prices are rising.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
As governor, I will prioritize community partnership with law enforcement, fully fund our local law enforcement, support our first responders and invest in addiction treatment, mental health services and community programming across our state.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Building Safer Communities
Candidate campaign source
As governor, I will prioritize community partnership with law enforcement, fully fund our local law enforcement, support our first responders and invest in addiction treatment, mental health services and community programming across our state.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
4.Lower Healthcare Premiums – Too many Ohioans are facing skyrocketing insurance premiums, and having to choose between putting other necessities on hold or forgoing insurance altogether. As governor, I will work to bring far more transparency to insurance and hospital pricing, lower healthcare prem…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: LOWERING HEALTHCARE COSTS:
Candidate campaign source
4.Lower Healthcare Premiums – Too many Ohioans are facing skyrocketing insurance premiums, and having to choose between putting other necessities on hold or forgoing insurance altogether. As governor, I will work to bring far more transparency to insurance and hospital pricing, lower healthcare premiums in the process, and support small businesses in covering their employees.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
Too many Ohioans are facing skyrocketing insurance premiums, and having to choose between putting other necessities on hold or forgoing insurance altogether. As governor, I will work to bring far more transparency to insurance and hospital pricing, lower healthcare premiums in the process, and suppo…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Lowering the Cost of Health Care
Candidate campaign source
Too many Ohioans are facing skyrocketing insurance premiums, and having to choose between putting other necessities on hold or forgoing insurance altogether. As governor, I will work to bring far more transparency to insurance and hospital pricing, lower healthcare premiums in the process, and support small businesses in covering their employees. I will strengthen Ohio’s efforts to crack down on surprise billing and build on the bipartisan effort to end predatory collection practices that only hurt Ohio families.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
The commitment of this campaign is an Ohio for everyone and for anyone. Whether you want to live in suburbia, a small Ohio village, an urban metropolis, rural Ohio, or Appalachian Ohio; we want to make it a place that is affordable, accessible, and healthy. You should be able to live in these places…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A Healthy, Affordable, and Desirable Ohio for Everyone+
Candidate campaign source
The commitment of this campaign is an Ohio for everyone and for anyone. Whether you want to live in suburbia, a small Ohio village, an urban metropolis, rural Ohio, or Appalachian Ohio; we want to make it a place that is affordable, accessible, and healthy. You should be able to live in these places and still have ready access to a job, to education, to healthcare, to nature, to stores and entertainment, to healthy food. You should be able to walk around where you live. You shouldn’t have to suffer crime or pollution. You should be able to live the life you want.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We will build the infrastructure of care that Ohio currently lacks. This means a significant expansion of community mental health centers and outpatient psychiatric services, accessible and affordable in every part of the state. It means more residential treatment capacity for serious mental illness…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Homelessness+
Candidate campaign source
We will build the infrastructure of care that Ohio currently lacks. This means a significant expansion of community mental health centers and outpatient psychiatric services, accessible and affordable in every part of the state. It means more residential treatment capacity for serious mental illness. It means accessible addiction treatment including medication-assisted treatment. It means permanent supportive housing for those with chronic mental illness or disability who need ongoing support to live stably. And it means robust case management: people who help individuals navigate housing,benefits, healthcare, and employment, and who maintain relationships with them over time.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Eric Conroy understands that small businesses are the engine of Ohio’s economy. As a supporter of local entrepreneurs and family-owned businesses, Eric is dedicated to cutting red tape and removing burdensome regulations that hinder growth, as well as working to lower the cost of health insurance fo…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Small Business
Candidate campaign source
Eric Conroy understands that small businesses are the engine of Ohio’s economy. As a supporter of local entrepreneurs and family-owned businesses, Eric is dedicated to cutting red tape and removing burdensome regulations that hinder growth, as well as working to lower the cost of health insurance for small businesses. Eric supports simplifying the tax code, increasing access to affordable capital, and reducing compliance costs to enable small businesses to focus on what they do best: creating jobs.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Eric believes that Social Security and Medicare are promises the United States has made to seniors that must be honored. These programs form the backbone of retirement security and healthcare for millions of seniors who worked hard, paid into the system, and earned the benefits they were promised. E…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Social Security and Medicare
Candidate campaign source
Eric believes that Social Security and Medicare are promises the United States has made to seniors that must be honored. These programs form the backbone of retirement security and healthcare for millions of seniors who worked hard, paid into the system, and earned the benefits they were promised. Eric strongly opposes any effort to cut benefits or raise the retirement age. Instead, he will work to strengthen and defend these programs for both current retirees and future generations, without burdening working families or those nearing retirement.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Eric supports bipartisan solutions to ensure the long-term solvency of Social Security and Medicare, including rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse in the system and ensuring that Washington stops raiding these programs to fund wasteful spending.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Social Security and Medicare
Candidate campaign source
Eric supports bipartisan solutions to ensure the long-term solvency of Social Security and Medicare, including rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse in the system and ensuring that Washington stops raiding these programs to fund wasteful spending.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Ohio candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Ohio incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Ohio legislators and Ohio’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Ohio’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
240 matching sponsorships or proposals · 88 Ohio incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Adam Mathews
Ohio House · District 56 · R–OH
4 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Adam MathewsOhio Legislature · HB 410
Prohibit Medicaid funds for certain abortion providers
Sep 15, 2025 · Referred to committee — Medicaid
Rep. Jean Schmidt · Sponsored / Rep. Adam Mathews · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would prohibit the payment of Medicaid funds to certain abortion providers.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on September 15, 2025: Referred to committee — Medicaid.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's reported induced-abortion count.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Induced abortions reported in Ohio · People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To enact section 5162.09 of the Revised Code to prohibit the payment of Medicaid funds to certain abortion providers.
The bill would allow a concealed handgun licensee to carry a handgun in a building or structure that is not a courthouse but in which a courtroom is located in specified circumstances and to permit a nonresident of Ohio to obtain statutory relief from firearms disability based on an Ohio conviction, guilty plea, or delinquent child adjudication.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on February 12, 2025: Referred to committee — Public Safety.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend sections 2923.123 and 2923.14 of the Revised Code to allow a concealed handgun licensee to carry a handgun in a building or structure that is not a courthouse but in which a courtroom is located in specified circumstances and to permit a nonresident of Ohio to obtain statutory relief from firearms disability based on an Ohio conviction, guilty plea, or delinquent child adjudication.
The bill would provide firearms training for fire investigators; to permit such an investigator who has received that training and has been specifically authorized to carry firearms while on duty; to grant such an investigator the same right to carry a concealed handgun in this state as a concealed handgun licensee; and to amend the version of section 109.73 of the Revised Code that is scheduled to take effect on December 29, 2023, to continue the change on and after that date.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on February 7, 2024: Reported — Government Oversight.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend sections 109.71, 109.73, 109.75, 109.79, 109.801, and 2923.126 and to enact sections 109.7481 and 109.774 of the Revised Code to provide firearms training for fire investigators; to permit such an investigator who has received that training and has been specifically authorized to carry firearms while on duty; to grant such an investigator the same right to carry a concealed handgun in this state as a concealed handgun licensee; and to amend the version of section 109.73 of the Revised Code that is…
The bill would allow a concealed handgun licensee to carry a handgun in a building or structure that is not a courthouse but in which a courtroom is located in specified circumstances and to permit a nonresident of Ohio to obtain statutory relief from firearms disability based on an Ohio conviction, guilty plea, or delinquent child adjudication.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on December 13, 2023: Referred to committee — Judiciary.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend sections 2923.123 and 2923.14 of the Revised Code to allow a concealed handgun licensee to carry a handgun in a building or structure that is not a courthouse but in which a courtroom is located in specified circumstances and to permit a nonresident of Ohio to obtain statutory relief from firearms disability based on an Ohio conviction, guilty plea, or delinquent child adjudication.
3 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Andrea WhiteOhio Legislature · HB 8
Require health plan and Medicaid coverage of biomarker testing
Feb 18, 2026 · Reported - Amended — Health
Rep. Andrea White · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would require health benefit plan and Medicaid program coverage of biomarker testing.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on February 18, 2026: Reported - Amended — Health.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To enact sections 3902.65 and 5164.13 of the Revised Code to require health benefit plan and Medicaid program coverage of biomarker testing.
Require health plan and Medicaid coverage of biomarker testing
Nov 12, 2024 · Referred to committee — Insurance
Rep. Andrea White · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would require health benefit plan and Medicaid program coverage of biomarker testing.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on November 12, 2024: Referred to committee — Insurance.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To enact sections 3902.64 and 5164.13 of the Revised Code to require health benefit plan and Medicaid program coverage of biomarker testing.
Require health plan and Medicaid coverage of biomarker testing
Dec 14, 2022 · Informally passed
Rep. Andrea White · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would require health benefit plan and Medicaid program coverage of biomarker testing.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on December 14, 2022: Informally passed.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To enact sections 3902.62 and 5164.13 of the Revised Code to require health benefit plan and Medicaid program coverage of biomarker testing.
The bill would require that gun trigger locks be attached and provided with firearms sales by federally licensed firearms dealers.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on June 11, 2025: Referred to committee — Public Safety.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend section 2923.25 of the Revised Code to require that gun trigger locks be attached and provided with firearms sales by federally licensed firearms dealers.
The bill addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on February 26, 2025: Referred to committee — Health.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's reported induced-abortion count.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Induced abortions reported in Ohio. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend sections 109.572, 2305.11, 2317.02, 2919.10, 2919.12, 2953.25, 3701.341, 3701.792, 3702.30, 4112.01, 4112.02, 4729.291, 4731.22, 4731.223, 4731.281, 4731.293, and 4743.09; to enact sections 2305.2312, 3732.01, 3732.02, 3732.03, 3732.04, 3732.05, 3732.06, 3732.07, 3732.08, 3732.09, and 3732.11; and to repeal sections 2307.54, 2317.56, 2317.561, 2919.101, 2919.124, 2919.171, 2919.19, 2919.191, 2919.192, 2919.193, 2919.194, 2919.195, 2919.196, 2919.197, 2919.198, 2919.199, 2919.1910, 2919.1912, 2919.1913,…
The bill addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on December 6, 2023: Referred to committee — Public Health Policy.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's reported induced-abortion count.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Induced abortions reported in Ohio. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend sections 109.572, 2305.11, 2317.02, 2919.10, 2919.12, 2953.25, 3701.341, 3701.792, 3702.30, 4112.01, 4112.02, 4729.291, 4731.22, 4731.223, 4731.281, 4731.293, and 4743.09; to enact sections 2305.2312, 3732.01, 3732.02, 3732.03, 3732.04, 3732.05, 3732.06, 3732.07, 3732.08, 3732.09, and 3732.11; and to repeal sections 2307.54, 2317.56, 2317.561, 2919.101, 2919.124, 2919.171, 2919.19, 2919.191, 2919.192, 2919.193, 2919.194, 2919.195, 2919.196, 2919.197, 2919.198, 2919.199, 2919.1910, 2919.1912, 2919.1913,…
The bill would require that gun trigger locks be attached and provided with firearms sales by federally licensed firearms dealers.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on June 26, 2023: Referred to committee — Government Oversight.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend section 2923.25 of the Revised Code to require that gun trigger locks be attached and provided with firearms sales by federally licensed firearms dealers.
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on May 20, 2026: Referred to committee — Insurance.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend section 1751.01 and to enact sections 3902.65 and 5164.11 of the Revised Code concerning insurance and Medicaid coverage for specified infertility services.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Bernard WillisOhio Legislature · HB 5
Enact the Repeat Offender Act
May 28, 2025 · Referred to committee — Judiciary
Rep. Josh Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Bernard Willis · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would create a repeat offender classification; create and modify certain firearm specifications; increase the penalties for certain firearm offenses and specifications, to broaden the scope of relief from firearms disability, and to modify the Sealing and Expungement Law.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on May 28, 2025: Referred to committee — Judiciary.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend sections 109.11, 109.57, 109.572, 109.578, 109.579, 2151.357, 2746.02, 2901.08, 2923.125, 2923.13, 2923.14, 2929.01, 2929.13, 2929.14, 2929.34, 2930.171, 2941.141, 2941.144, 2941.145, 2941.146, 2951.041, 2953.25, 2953.26, 2953.31, 2953.32, 2953.34, 2953.39, 2953.61, 4723.28, 4729.16, 4729.56, 4729.57, 4729.96, 4752.09, and 5120.035 and to enact sections 2941.1427, 2941.1428, 2941.1429, 2953.311, 2953.321, 2953.322, and 2953.323 of the Revised Code to enact the Repeat Offender Act to create a repeat…
2 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Bill RoemerOhio Legislature · HB 600
Expand Medicaid PACE component
Mar 22, 2022 · Referred to committee — Finance
Rep. Bill Roemer · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would expand Ohio's Medicaid component known as the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) and to make an appropriation.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on March 22, 2022: Referred to committee — Finance.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend sections 173.50 and 173.501 of the Revised Code to expand Ohio's Medicaid component known as the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) and to make an appropriation.
Require health insurance reimburse dentists for PPE
Jun 3, 2020 · Referred to committee — Insurance
Rep. Bill Roemer · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill would require dental insurance plans and the Medicaid program to reimburse dentists for personal protective equipment.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on June 3, 2020: Referred to committee — Insurance.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Ohio evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend section 3902.30 and to enact sections 3902.40 and 5164.04 of the Revised Code to require dental insurance plans and the Medicaid program to reimburse dentists for personal protective equipment.
Only current Ohio officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Ohio statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Ohio snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Ohio, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.