Electricity prices and bills, generation and fuel mix, and gasoline costs.
Residential electricity price15.99¢/kWh2024 · #17 of 50 · highest first
Regular gasoline price$3.988/gal2026-08 · #24 of 48 · highest first
Average monthly residential electricity bill$135.162024 · #25 of 50 · highest first
Ohio over time
Explore Ohio readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Ohio officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Ohio effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Ohio change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Residential electricity price Ohio · source units
OhioPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
17 of 17 reviewed Ohio actions match · 16 date markers shown. 49 major events shown separately.
Ohio · 2024: 15.99¢/kWh · Rank #17 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills. Generation is electricity produced inside Ohio, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Ohio · state comparison
Household energy prices
Unit prices are separate from bills: usage, weather, and household needs also determine spending.
Ohio · 202415.99¢/kWh
Ohio rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark16.48¢/kWhSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential electricity price
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Ohio, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Ohio
2024 · Ohio: 15.99¢/kWh · Rank #17 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 16.48¢/kWh · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Ohio Residential electricity price history
Period
Ohio
Compare
2015
12.8¢/kWh
2016
12.47¢/kWh
2017
12.63¢/kWh
2018
12.56¢/kWh
2019
12.38¢/kWh
2020
12.29¢/kWh
2021
12.77¢/kWh
2022
13.85¢/kWh
2023
15.38¢/kWh
2024
15.99¢/kWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.51¢/kWhHigher value · 42.86¢/kWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 15.99¢/kWh2024 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Residential electricity price · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
42.86¢/kWh
—
#2
California
31.97¢/kWh
—
#3
Massachusetts
29.35¢/kWh
—
#4
Connecticut
28.75¢/kWh
—
#5
Rhode Island
28.65¢/kWh
—
#6
Alaska
24.82¢/kWh
—
#7
New York
24.43¢/kWh
—
#8
Maine
24.29¢/kWh
—
#9
New Hampshire
23.4¢/kWh
—
#10
Vermont
21.9¢/kWh
—
#11
New Jersey
19.34¢/kWh
—
#12
Michigan
19.3¢/kWh
—
#13
Maryland
17.86¢/kWh
—
#14
Pennsylvania
17.77¢/kWh
—
#15
Wisconsin
17.18¢/kWh
—
#16
Delaware
16.57¢/kWh
—
#17
Ohio · your comparison
15.99¢/kWh
—
#18
Illinois
15.87¢/kWh
—
#19
Minnesota
15.45¢/kWh
—
#20
Alabama
15.18¢/kWh
—
#21
West Virginia
15.07¢/kWh
—
#22
Nevada
15¢/kWh
—
#23
Texas
14.94¢/kWh
—
#24
Colorado
14.92¢/kWh
—
#25
Arizona
14.91¢/kWh
—
#26
Indiana
14.77¢/kWh
—
#27
Oregon
14.7¢/kWh
—
#28
Virginia
14.41¢/kWh
—
#29
South Carolina
14.23¢/kWh
—
#30
New Mexico
14.2¢/kWh
—
#31
Kansas
14.15¢/kWh
—
#32
Florida
14.14¢/kWh
—
#33
North Carolina
14.13¢/kWh
—
#34
Georgia
14.08¢/kWh
—
#35
Iowa
13.4¢/kWh
—
#36
Mississippi
13.39¢/kWh
—
#37
Missouri
12.91¢/kWh
—
#38
South Dakota
12.86¢/kWh
—
#39
Kentucky
12.79¢/kWh
—
#40
Montana
12.66¢/kWh
—
#41
Wyoming
12.47¢/kWh
—
#42
Tennessee
12.42¢/kWh
—
#43
Arkansas
12.32¢/kWh
—
#44
Oklahoma
12.24¢/kWh
—
#45
Utah
12.22¢/kWh
—
#46
Washington
11.9¢/kWh
—
#47
Louisiana
11.73¢/kWh
—
#48
Nebraska
11.53¢/kWh
—
#49
Idaho
11.52¢/kWh
—
#50
North Dakota
11.51¢/kWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Estimated statewide average retail price of regular-grade gasoline across all formulations, including taxes.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Recent weekly prices
Prior week
$3.981/gal
Weekly change
−18.4¢
One year earlier
$3.172/gal
Change from one year earlier
+62.5¢
Method and limitations
U.S. Energy Information Administration weekly retail motor-gasoline survey estimate for Ohio. FactVote displays the published dollars-per-gallon value and calculates changes from EIA's published prior-week and year-earlier observations.
The statewide estimate does not represent the price at every station or in every Ohio community.
The series is nominal and not adjusted for inflation or seasonal patterns, and weekly estimates can be revised.
The price reflects crude-oil costs, refining, distribution, marketing, and taxes; it does not identify the effect of any single policy or market event.
Compare the bill, electricity used, and price per unit for the same year.
Ohio · 2024$135.16
Ohio rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$142.26Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Average monthly residential electricity bill
State residential revenue and sales divided by customer accounts, averaged across the year.
Bills describe average customer accounts rather than a particular household. Dollars are nominal; usage reflects climate and building characteristics as well as efficiency.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Ohio
2024 · Ohio: $135.16 · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $142.26 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Ohio Average monthly residential electricity bill history
Period
Ohio
Compare
2010
$105.28
2011
$104.86
2012
$105.23
2013
$107.07
2014
$112.62
2015
$112.25
2016
$111.15
2017
$106.13
2018
$114.8
2019
$108.15
2020
$107.3
2021
$112.21
2022
$121.07
2023
$124.68
2024
$135.16
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · $92.88Higher value · $212.12Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · $135.162024 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Average monthly residential electricity bill · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$212.12
—
#2
Connecticut
$199.66
—
#3
Alabama
$173.5
—
#4
Massachusetts
$167.2
—
#5
Maryland
$165.87
—
#6
Texas
$163.72
—
#7
Rhode Island
$162.4
—
#8
California
$160.86
—
#9
Arizona
$160.24
—
#10
Florida
$156.09
—
#11
Mississippi
$154.83
—
#12
West Virginia
$154.76
—
#13
Georgia
$151.25
—
#14
Delaware
$150.87
—
#15
South Carolina
$149.51
—
#16
Virginia
$148.77
—
#17
Pennsylvania
$145.17
—
#18
New Hampshire
$144.87
—
#19
Alaska
$143.54
—
#20
North Carolina
$143.5
—
#21
Tennessee
$143.32
—
#22
Louisiana
$140.96
—
#23
New York
$139.53
—
#24
Nevada
$139.39
—
#25
Ohio · your comparison
$135.16
—
#26
Kentucky
$133.81
—
#27
Maine
$133.6
—
#28
Indiana
$133.06
—
#29
Oklahoma
$132.05
—
#30
Oregon
$129.62
—
#31
Missouri
$129.18
—
#32
Arkansas
$129.13
—
#33
New Jersey
$128.13
—
#34
South Dakota
$127.81
—
#35
Vermont
$125.66
—
#36
Kansas
$123.9
—
#37
Michigan
$119.31
—
#38
North Dakota
$118.38
—
#39
Washington
$113.68
—
#40
Iowa
$111.54
—
#41
Wisconsin
$110.87
—
#42
Nebraska
$110.28
—
#43
Minnesota
$110.06
—
#44
Illinois
$109.99
—
#45
Idaho
$108.73
—
#46
Montana
$107.91
—
#47
Wyoming
$107.65
—
#48
Colorado
$100.57
—
#49
Utah
$94.57
—
#50
New Mexico
$92.88
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare total generation and each fuel’s share using the same EIA year. A fuel share is not a performance score.
Ohio · 2024143.3 TWh
Ohio rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total electricity generation
For 2024, FactVote combines EIA utility-scale net generation with EIA's estimated small-scale solar generation and groups sources into seven categories. The 2015–2023 historical points retain utility-scale coverage. The residential price is EIA's annual average revenue per kilowatthour and includes generation, transmission, distribution, taxes, and fees reflected in electric bills.
Generation is electricity produced inside Ohio, not electricity consumed there; interstate imports and exports are not represented. The 2024 comparison includes EIA's estimated generation from small-scale solar systems under 1 megawatt. Historical points for 2015–2023 retain utility-scale coverage and exclude those estimates, so comparisons across 2023–2024 also reflect this change in coverage. The 'other' category is the residual of remaining reported energy sources. The residential price is a statewide nominal average and can mask large differences among utilities, plans, and household usage.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Ohio
2024 · Ohio: 143.3 TWh · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Ohio Total electricity generation history
Period
Ohio
Compare
2015
123.1 TWh
2016
119.9 TWh
2017
120.8 TWh
2018
127.9 TWh
2019
121.6 TWh
2020
122.5 TWh
2021
125.9 TWh
2022
135.8 TWh
2023
133.2 TWh
2024
143.3 TWh
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.5 TWhHigher value · 571.5 TWhStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 143.3 TWh2024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Total electricity generation · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
571.5 TWh
—
#2
Florida
270.7 TWh
—
#3
California
245.9 TWh
—
#4
Pennsylvania
242.5 TWh
—
#5
Illinois
186.7 TWh
—
#6
Ohio · your comparison
143.3 TWh
—
#7
Alabama
142.9 TWh
—
#8
Georgia
140.4 TWh
—
#9
North Carolina
135.9 TWh
—
#10
New York
133.5 TWh
—
#11
Michigan
124.5 TWh
—
#12
Arizona
121.5 TWh
—
#13
Virginia
103.7 TWh
—
#14
Washington
103 TWh
—
#15
South Carolina
101.1 TWh
—
#16
Louisiana
100 TWh
—
#17
Indiana
97.4 TWh
—
#18
Oklahoma
94.3 TWh
—
#19
Mississippi
77.4 TWh
—
#20
Tennessee
76.3 TWh
—
#21
Iowa
70.9 TWh
—
#22
Missouri
67.6 TWh
—
#23
Kentucky
67.1 TWh
—
#24
Wisconsin
65.6 TWh
—
#25
Oregon
65.3 TWh
—
#26
New Jersey
63.6 TWh
—
#27
Arkansas
62.1 TWh
—
#28
Colorado
60.8 TWh
—
#29
Minnesota
59 TWh
—
#30
Kansas
57.9 TWh
—
#31
West Virginia
50.7 TWh
—
#32
Nevada
47.6 TWh
—
#33
Connecticut
46.2 TWh
—
#34
North Dakota
42.6 TWh
—
#35
Wyoming
40.7 TWh
—
#36
New Mexico
40.5 TWh
—
#37
Nebraska
37.3 TWh
—
#38
Maryland
36.9 TWh
—
#39
Utah
36.1 TWh
—
#40
Montana
27 TWh
—
#41
Massachusetts
25 TWh
—
#42
South Dakota
20.9 TWh
—
#43
Idaho
20.3 TWh
—
#44
New Hampshire
17.3 TWh
—
#45
Maine
15.7 TWh
—
#46
Hawaii
10.7 TWh
—
#47
Rhode Island
10.1 TWh
—
#48
Alaska
6.7 TWh
—
#49
Delaware
5 TWh
—
#50
Vermont
2.5 TWh
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of electricity generated at Ohio facilities from renewable energy resources during 2024.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Renewable-share calculation
Renewable generation
7,582,702 MWh
Total in-state generation
142,746,706 MWh
Other major generation sources
Natural gas
59.6%
Coal
21.1%
Nuclear
12.6%
Method and limitations
FactVote sums EIA's 2024 hydroelectric, other-biomass, solar, wind, and wood generation and divides by total electric-industry generation, then rounds to one decimal place.
This measures in-state electricity generation, not total energy consumption or the generation mix of imported electricity.
The percentage does not by itself measure emissions, reliability, affordability, or land use.
Outage comparisons use the same reporting standard. Major-event outages and ordinary-day outages use different EIA reporting definitions.
Ohio · 2024511 min/year
Ohio rank#18among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark662.6 min/yearSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Outage minutes per customer · all events
EIA distribution-system reliability for utilities using the IEEE standard. SAIDI is average customer interruption duration; SAIFI is average frequency.
Reported customer coverage is incomplete and differs by state. These figures cover reporting utilities, not every customer. Major-event definitions follow IEEE; a severe-weather year can dominate the all-events value. Coverage percentage is not itself outage performance.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Ohio
2024 · Ohio: 511 min/year · Rank #18 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 662.6 min/year · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Ohio Outage minutes per customer · all events history
Period
Ohio
Compare
2023
366.6 min/year
2024
511 min/year
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 83.6 min/yearHigher value · 3,155 min/yearStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 511 min/year2024 · Rank #18 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Outage minutes per customer · all events · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
South Carolina
3,155 min/year
—
#2
Maine
1,748.6 min/year
—
#3
Texas
1,614.3 min/year
—
#4
North Carolina
1,518.1 min/year
—
#5
Florida
1,487.6 min/year
—
#6
Georgia
1,208.1 min/year
—
#7
West Virginia
1,165.5 min/year
—
#8
Virginia
962.1 min/year
—
#9
Vermont
895.8 min/year
—
#10
New Hampshire
735.5 min/year
—
#11
Nebraska
697.8 min/year
—
#12
Washington
643.5 min/year
—
#13
Louisiana
630.6 min/year
—
#14
Mississippi
607.3 min/year
—
#15
Oregon
579.3 min/year
—
#16
Kentucky
537.7 min/year
—
#17
Arkansas
527.8 min/year
—
#18
Ohio · your comparison
511 min/year
—
#19
Michigan
481.7 min/year
—
#20
New York
477.3 min/year
—
#21
Hawaii
382.6 min/year
—
#22
Pennsylvania
353.1 min/year
—
#23
Montana
341.7 min/year
—
#24
Alaska
323.2 min/year
—
#25
Indiana
310 min/year
—
#26
Wisconsin
296.8 min/year
—
#27
Kansas
289.8 min/year
—
#28
Tennessee
289.3 min/year
—
#29
California
285 min/year
—
#30
New Mexico
272.6 min/year
—
#31
Colorado
257 min/year
—
#32
Minnesota
222.4 min/year
—
#33
Oklahoma
220.7 min/year
—
#34
Missouri
212.6 min/year
—
#35
Idaho
204.4 min/year
—
#36
Iowa
200.3 min/year
—
#37
Alabama
197.7 min/year
—
#38
New Jersey
173.3 min/year
—
#39
Nevada
158.9 min/year
—
#40
Illinois
158 min/year
—
#41
Connecticut
152.8 min/year
—
#42
Wyoming
137.8 min/year
—
#43
Maryland
118.1 min/year
—
#44
Delaware
117.9 min/year
—
#45
Utah
115.4 min/year
—
#46
Rhode Island
104.3 min/year
—
#47
Massachusetts
103.7 min/year
—
#48
North Dakota
102.7 min/year
—
#49
South Dakota
85.6 min/year
—
#50
Arizona
83.6 min/year
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Total energy consumption includes more than electricity. EIA assigns electricity-related losses to consuming end-use sectors.
Ohio · 2024767.4 trillion Btu
Ohio rank#7among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark18,424 trillion BtuSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Residential energy consumption
Annual energy consumption by end-use sector, in trillion British thermal units (Btu).
2024 SEDS estimates. Industrial and total figures exclude noncombustible renewable energy inputs used to produce biofuels. Includes allocated electric-system energy losses. Size, climate, industry mix, and activity affect absolute rankings.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 29.5 trillion BtuHigher value · 1,514 trillion BtuStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 767.4 trillion Btu2024 · Rank #7 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Residential energy consumption · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
1,514 trillion Btu
—
#2
Florida
1,183.3 trillion Btu
—
#3
California
1,147.1 trillion Btu
—
#4
New York
968.3 trillion Btu
—
#5
Pennsylvania
819.3 trillion Btu
—
#6
Illinois
817.1 trillion Btu
—
#7
Ohio · your comparison
767.4 trillion Btu
—
#8
Georgia
717.1 trillion Btu
—
#9
North Carolina
662.2 trillion Btu
—
#10
Michigan
661.4 trillion Btu
—
#11
New Jersey
550.1 trillion Btu
—
#12
Virginia
526 trillion Btu
—
#13
Tennessee
492 trillion Btu
—
#14
Indiana
475.6 trillion Btu
—
#15
Missouri
459 trillion Btu
—
#16
Arizona
413.7 trillion Btu
—
#17
Massachusetts
379 trillion Btu
—
#18
Wisconsin
375.9 trillion Btu
—
#19
South Carolina
370.7 trillion Btu
—
#20
Maryland
357.2 trillion Btu
—
#21
Minnesota
346.2 trillion Btu
—
#22
Alabama
331.6 trillion Btu
—
#23
Washington
330.2 trillion Btu
—
#24
Kentucky
319 trillion Btu
—
#25
Colorado
311.9 trillion Btu
—
#26
Louisiana
282.6 trillion Btu
—
#27
Connecticut
235.3 trillion Btu
—
#28
Oklahoma
231 trillion Btu
—
#29
Arkansas
209.5 trillion Btu
—
#30
Utah
190.7 trillion Btu
—
#31
Mississippi
179.7 trillion Btu
—
#32
Oregon
173.1 trillion Btu
—
#33
Kansas
166.4 trillion Btu
—
#34
Iowa
162 trillion Btu
—
#35
Nevada
153.3 trillion Btu
—
#36
West Virginia
141 trillion Btu
—
#37
Nebraska
128.9 trillion Btu
—
#38
Idaho
111.2 trillion Btu
—
#39
New Mexico
98.1 trillion Btu
—
#40
New Hampshire
91.8 trillion Btu
—
#41
Maine
80.5 trillion Btu
—
#42
Montana
73.9 trillion Btu
—
#43
Delaware
62.6 trillion Btu
—
#44
North Dakota
61.3 trillion Btu
—
#45
Rhode Island
61 trillion Btu
—
#46
Alaska
49.1 trillion Btu
—
#47
Wyoming
45.5 trillion Btu
—
#48
South Dakota
44.2 trillion Btu
—
#49
Vermont
32.7 trillion Btu
—
#50
Hawaii
29.5 trillion Btu
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Combustion emissions describe fossil energy use. Production, consumption, emissions, and international trade have different accounting boundaries.
Ohio · 2024186.34 Mt CO₂
Ohio rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4,780.66 Mt CO₂Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions
Thousand metric tons of carbon dioxide from energy consumption.
2024 SEDS estimates. Energy-related CO₂ excludes non-energy greenhouse gases and is not a complete climate footprint. Production emissions are assigned to electric power, rather than reallocating electricity emissions to consumers.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Ohio stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Ohio has a dark outline.
Lower value · 5.36 Mt CO₂Higher value · 679.93 Mt CO₂Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Ohio · 186.34 Mt CO₂2024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Ohio with every state · 50 ranked
Total energy-related CO₂ emissions · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
679.93 Mt CO₂
—
#2
California
315.98 Mt CO₂
—
#3
Florida
230.85 Mt CO₂
—
#4
Pennsylvania
201.57 Mt CO₂
—
#5
Louisiana
186.89 Mt CO₂
—
#6
Ohio · your comparison
186.34 Mt CO₂
—
#7
Illinois
163.98 Mt CO₂
—
#8
New York
163.69 Mt CO₂
—
#9
Indiana
152.3 Mt CO₂
—
#10
Michigan
143.11 Mt CO₂
—
#11
Georgia
127.83 Mt CO₂
—
#12
North Carolina
119.07 Mt CO₂
—
#13
Kentucky
106.87 Mt CO₂
—
#14
Alabama
104.32 Mt CO₂
—
#15
Virginia
99.24 Mt CO₂
—
#16
Missouri
98.03 Mt CO₂
—
#17
Tennessee
90.46 Mt CO₂
—
#18
Oklahoma
88.56 Mt CO₂
—
#19
New Jersey
87.84 Mt CO₂
—
#20
Wisconsin
85.12 Mt CO₂
—
#21
Arizona
82.2 Mt CO₂
—
#22
Colorado
79.57 Mt CO₂
—
#23
Minnesota
77.89 Mt CO₂
—
#24
Washington
73.81 Mt CO₂
—
#25
West Virginia
72.28 Mt CO₂
—
#26
South Carolina
70.81 Mt CO₂
—
#27
Iowa
65.23 Mt CO₂
—
#28
Mississippi
64.75 Mt CO₂
—
#29
Arkansas
58.42 Mt CO₂
—
#30
Massachusetts
58.07 Mt CO₂
—
#31
North Dakota
55.15 Mt CO₂
—
#32
Kansas
55.09 Mt CO₂
—
#33
Utah
55.03 Mt CO₂
—
#34
Wyoming
50 Mt CO₂
—
#35
Maryland
48.77 Mt CO₂
—
#36
Alaska
44.01 Mt CO₂
—
#37
Nebraska
43.54 Mt CO₂
—
#38
New Mexico
41.63 Mt CO₂
—
#39
Nevada
39.28 Mt CO₂
—
#40
Oregon
38.94 Mt CO₂
—
#41
Connecticut
37.09 Mt CO₂
—
#42
Montana
27.16 Mt CO₂
—
#43
Idaho
21.11 Mt CO₂
—
#44
Hawaii
17.96 Mt CO₂
—
#45
Maine
15.99 Mt CO₂
—
#46
South Dakota
15.11 Mt CO₂
—
#47
New Hampshire
13.6 Mt CO₂
—
#48
Delaware
11.52 Mt CO₂
—
#49
Rhode Island
11.05 Mt CO₂
—
#50
Vermont
5.36 Mt CO₂
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
17 of 17 reviewed Ohio actions · newest first
Jul 16, 2026 · H.R.9700 · Ratepayer Justice and Commercial Power Accountability Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Ohio delegation · H.R.9700
Ratepayer Justice and Commercial Power Accountability Act
Jul 16, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Marcy Kaptur · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4617)
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's displayed renewable-generation share.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Ratepayer Community Restoration Grants (a) Award of grants The Secretary of Energy shall award grants, which shall be known as Ratepayer Community Restoration Grants and without any matching requirement, in designated communities to local governments, regional development organizations, organizations described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or community development financial institutions. (b) Use of grants A Ratepayer Community Restoration Grant awarded to an entity described in…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 20, 2026 · HB 931 · Regards use of E15 blended fuel for state motor vehicles · In House Transportation CommitteeOhio Legislature · HB 931
Regards use of E15 blended fuel for state motor vehicles
May 20, 2026 · In House Transportation Committee
Rep. Josh Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 931 proposes changing how compatible Ohio state vehicles use E15 blended gasoline when it is reasonably available and priced.
The House referred HB 931 to the Transportation Committee on May 20, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 931 concerns use of E15 blended gasoline in Ohio's state motor-vehicle fleet. It addresses state gasoline purchasing and blend demand, not the statewide per-gallon market price measured by EIA, and remained in the House Transportation Committee.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official long title says HB 931 concerns the use of E15 blended fuel for state motor vehicles.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 13, 2026 · HB 850 · Temporarily reduce motor fuel tax rates · In House Finance CommitteeOhio Legislature · HB 850
Temporarily reduce motor fuel tax rates
May 13, 2026 · In House Finance Committee
Rep. Ty D. Mathews · Sponsored / Rep. Adam C. Bird · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 850 proposes a three-month, 50% reduction in Ohio's motor-fuel tax rates, including a gasoline-rate reduction from 38.5 cents to 19.25 cents per gallon.
The House referred HB 850 to the Finance Committee on May 13, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 850 would temporarily reduce Ohio's gasoline tax from 38.5 cents to 19.25 cents per gallon and the other-motor-fuel rate from 47 cents to 23.5 cents for three months. Because EIA's retail estimate includes taxes, the proposal directly targets a component of the displayed pump price; it remained in the House Finance Committee and was not in effect for the August observation.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official bill page describes HB 850 as temporarily reducing motor-fuel tax rates and declaring an emergency.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 13, 2026 · HB 832 · Regards virtual net metering and meter aggregation · Referred to committee — EnergyOhio Legislature · HB 832
Regards virtual net metering and meter aggregation
May 13, 2026 · Referred to committee — Energy
Rep. Tex Fischer · Sponsored / Rep. David Thomas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on May 13, 2026: Referred to committee — Energy.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's displayed renewable-generation share.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend section 4928.67 and to enact sections 4928.675, 4928.676, 4928.677, 4928.678, 4928.679, 4928.6710, and 4928.6711 of the Revised Code regarding virtual net metering and meter aggregation.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 25, 2026 · HB 773 · Require E15 fuel at turnpike facilities; biodiesel fuel study · In House Transportation CommitteeOhio Legislature · HB 773
Require E15 fuel at turnpike facilities; biodiesel fuel study
Mar 25, 2026 · In House Transportation Committee
Rep. Josh Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Roy Klopfenstein · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 773 proposes requiring E15 gasoline availability at Ohio Turnpike service facilities and studying biodiesel availability there.
The House referred HB 773 to the Transportation Committee on March 25, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 773 would require E15 blended gasoline to be sold at Ohio Turnpike service facilities. It could change the availability and blend mix of gasoline at a limited set of locations, but it does not set statewide pump prices and remained in committee.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official long title says the bill would require the sale of E15 blended fuel at turnpike service facilities.
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's displayed renewable-generation share.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Preclusion of repeat litigation (a) Definitions In this section: (1) Authorization The term authorization means any license, permit, approval, finding, determination, or administrative decision issued by an agency and any interagency consultation that is required or authorized under Federal law in order to site, construct, reconstruct, or commence operations of an energy project administered by— (A) a Federal agency; or (B) in the case of a State participating in or administering a review required or authorized…
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Ohio officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions from FactVote’s Ohio candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
45 statements from 14 candidates
2026 Ohio Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election
4 candidates with matching statements · 18 statements
The joint-ticket campaign raises concerns about data centers' effects on farmland, water, electricity, and local control, without specifying a project-review action.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Data Centers
Candidate campaign source
The joint-ticket campaign raises concerns about data centers' effects on farmland, water, electricity, and local control, without specifying a project-review action.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026
Today I am announcing my policy pledge to Ohioans on data centers. If a data center is built in your community, then (i) you will no longer have to pay for your home’s electricity, (ii) you will pay lower property taxes, and (iii) the data center will be required to abide by all air and water qualit…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A Message from Vivek
Candidate campaign source
Today I am announcing my policy pledge to Ohioans on data centers. If a data center is built in your community, then (i) you will no longer have to pay for your home’s electricity, (ii) you will pay lower property taxes, and (iii) the data center will be required to abide by all air and water quality standards without exception, and we will take the necessary steps to protect Ohio’s fertile farmland. If any one of these three conditions is not met, the data center won’t be built. Period. I will work with Ohio’s state legislature to codify these commitments into law immediately after I assume office.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026
EV and battery dominance: Invest in lithium battery production Fuel cell research Support electric tech stack dominance through Ohio’s existing cutting edge research universities, car manufacturing, and solar manufacturing industry.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Infrastructure, Transport, and the Physical Economy+
Candidate campaign source
EV and battery dominance: Invest in lithium battery production Fuel cell research Support electric tech stack dominance through Ohio’s existing cutting edge research universities, car manufacturing, and solar manufacturing industry.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Ohio will raise the severance tax to 4% of the market value at the point of extraction on oil and natural gas. This remains well below other producing states but is a significant increase for Ohio.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Ohio Tax Plan
Candidate campaign source
Ohio will raise the severance tax to 4% of the market value at the point of extraction on oil and natural gas. This remains well below other producing states but is a significant increase for Ohio.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
A smart grid also enables more efficient, market-driven energy generation and distribution, integrating rooftop solar, microgrids, home battery systems, and the growing fleet of electric vehicles that function as distributed energy storage. The result is a more resilient, more efficient,and lower-co…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Telecommunications+
Candidate campaign source
A smart grid also enables more efficient, market-driven energy generation and distribution, integrating rooftop solar, microgrids, home battery systems, and the growing fleet of electric vehicles that function as distributed energy storage. The result is a more resilient, more efficient,and lower-cost energy system for everyone.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We will build a smart energy grid for Ohio. We will legalize and encourage the construction of solar, wind, and battery storage facilities. We will establish the research and regulatory infrastructure for nuclear innovation, including investment in small modular reactors and next-generation nuclear …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Telecommunications+
Candidate campaign source
We will build a smart energy grid for Ohio. We will legalize and encourage the construction of solar, wind, and battery storage facilities. We will establish the research and regulatory infrastructure for nuclear innovation, including investment in small modular reactors and next-generation nuclear design. We will make Ohio the cheapest place in the country to buy electricity, attracting energy-intensive industries and giving households more money to spend on everything else.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
We will take full advantage of the datacenter buildout to ensure large datacenter developers are financing the big investments in new, clean energy and grid development to enable lower costs for all, abundant energy in the future, and a modern grid. Not surprisingly, all debate around datacenters ha…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Telecommunications+
Candidate campaign source
We will take full advantage of the datacenter buildout to ensure large datacenter developers are financing the big investments in new, clean energy and grid development to enable lower costs for all, abundant energy in the future, and a modern grid. Not surprisingly, all debate around datacenters has so far ignored the massive opportunity before us to usher in the new energy revolution.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Today I am announcing my policy pledge to Ohioans on data centers. If a data center is built in your community, then (i) you will no longer have to pay for your home’s electricity, (ii) you will pay lower property taxes, and (iii) the data center will be required to abide by all air and water qualit…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A Message from Vivek
Candidate campaign source
Today I am announcing my policy pledge to Ohioans on data centers. If a data center is built in your community, then (i) you will no longer have to pay for your home’s electricity, (ii) you will pay lower property taxes, and (iii) the data center will be required to abide by all air and water quality standards without exception, and we will take the necessary steps to protect Ohio’s fertile farmland. If any one of these three conditions is not met, the data center won’t be built. Period. I will work with Ohio’s state legislature to codify these commitments into law immediately after I assume office.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
In addition to providing free electricity for local residents, my plan would also deliver property tax relief to Ohioans within the benefit zone – by prohibiting property tax abatements for future data centers and creating a property tax rebate for Ohio homeowners. That is, data centers would be req…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A Message from Vivek
Candidate campaign source
In addition to providing free electricity for local residents, my plan would also deliver property tax relief to Ohioans within the benefit zone – by prohibiting property tax abatements for future data centers and creating a property tax rebate for Ohio homeowners. That is, data centers would be required to pay 100% of their property taxes without abatements, and these property tax revenues would directly fund property tax rebates for homeowners. This helps deliver major property tax relief for Ohio families without hurting local police, schools, or firemen – and may become essential with a looming ballot initiative to eliminate property taxes expected in 2027.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Eliminating electricity costs is the right objective. If Ohio’s governor sets this as a clear requirement and negotiates accordingly, I am confident that hyper scalers would be willing to fully cover the cost of power for Ohioans who reside near a data center. That requires the acumen of a businessm…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Data-center electricity benefit zones
Candidate campaign source
Eliminating electricity costs is the right objective. If Ohio’s governor sets this as a clear requirement and negotiates accordingly, I am confident that hyper scalers would be willing to fully cover the cost of power for Ohioans who reside near a data center. That requires the acumen of a businessman, not a bureaucrat, at the top. This is very practical to implement. Data centers could generate power behind their own meter, and the excess power generated can be credited to the electric charges on a residential customer’s electric bill within a certain radius (the “benefit zone”). This would operate as if customers in the benefit zone had executed a power purchase agreement with the power plant, but at no cost. For example, if a data center is constructed along with a 1,000 megawatt (MW) natural gas or nuclear power plant, and the data center uses 700MW of that electricity, the remaining 300MW would flow to the power grid. State law would define the benefit zone and credit the 300MW across all residential customers within that zone. Even 100MW would power 75,000-100,000 homes. Given the potential to power so many homes, most of Ohio’s counties would fit entirely within a benefit zone – which means every resident in the county would pay nothing for their electricity if a data center were built there. Alternatively, data centers could also directly reimburse residential customers within the benefit zone for their electric bills.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
That means supporting economic growth for Ohio’s workers, while ensuring that we do it in a way that helps all Ohioans. In sum, my administration will eliminate electricity costs and reduce property taxes for homeowners, while also ensuring that all environmental laws are respected and that farmland…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A Message from Vivek
Candidate campaign source
That means supporting economic growth for Ohio’s workers, while ensuring that we do it in a way that helps all Ohioans. In sum, my administration will eliminate electricity costs and reduce property taxes for homeowners, while also ensuring that all environmental laws are respected and that farmland is preserved. No data center will be built in Ohio without actualizing these commitments. I look forward to signing legislation in early 2027 to turn this vision into reality.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Broadband is infrastructure. It is as essential as roads, electricity, and clean water. Expanding rural internet access means investing in fiber where it makes sense, supporting wireless and satellite where terrain demands it, and making sure federal dollars actually reach unserved communities inste…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
Broadband is infrastructure. It is as essential as roads, electricity, and clean water. Expanding rural internet access means investing in fiber where it makes sense, supporting wireless and satellite where terrain demands it, and making sure federal dollars actually reach unserved communities instead of padding balance sheets. It also means accountability. Companies should not take public funds and then leave whole counties behind. Rural communities are not asking for special treatment. They are asking for a fair shot. Reliable high-speed internet lets a kid apply for college, lets a farmer access markets, lets a small-town entrepreneur compete with anyone. If we say we believe in opportunity, we have to wire the places that have been overlooked.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
AI systems are being used to make hiring decisions, approve loans, generate news, write code, and influence public opinion. If those systems are biased, opaque, or weaponized, the damage scales quickly. We should require transparency in AI systems, clear accountability when harm is caused, and guard…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
AI systems are being used to make hiring decisions, approve loans, generate news, write code, and influence public opinion. If those systems are biased, opaque, or weaponized, the damage scales quickly. We should require transparency in AI systems, clear accountability when harm is caused, and guardrails around how government and corporations deploy these tools. There should never be profiles built on American citizens. Data centers are important in this economy, and they come with real costs. They draw enormous amounts of electricity and water. In some regions, they strain grids and raise local rates. If communities are hosting these facilities, they deserve strong environmental standards, fair taxation, and infrastructure investments that offset the load. Growth is welcome. Exploitation is not.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Reducing energy costs means increasing supply while modernizing the grid and investing in efficiency. That includes domestic production, but it also includes scaling renewables that have no fuel cost once built. Wind and solar drive prices down over time because the input is free. Nuclear keeps base…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Candidate statement
Candidate campaign source
Reducing energy costs means increasing supply while modernizing the grid and investing in efficiency. That includes domestic production, but it also includes scaling renewables that have no fuel cost once built. Wind and solar drive prices down over time because the input is free. Nuclear keeps baseload stable. Storage and grid upgrades prevent outages and price spikes. The goal is reliability and affordability while keeping our air and water clean. We should also make it cheaper for families to lower their own bills. Home weatherization, efficient appliances, rooftop solar where it makes sense. Every kilowatt saved is money back in someone’s pocket. Energy policy should be about keeping the lights on at a price people can afford.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Carey Coleman will take action to lower the cost of living and restore economic stability. He supports reining in out-of-control federal spending, restoring fiscal discipline, and ending wasteful programs that drive inflation. Carey will fight to unleash American energy production to bring down fuel…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Putting Ohio First: Carey’s Plan
Candidate campaign source
Carey Coleman will take action to lower the cost of living and restore economic stability. He supports reining in out-of-control federal spending, restoring fiscal discipline, and ending wasteful programs that drive inflation. Carey will fight to unleash American energy production to bring down fuel and utility costs, reduce supply chain bottlenecks that raise prices on everyday goods, and protect middle-class families from new taxes and mandates. He believes small businesses and working families deserve relief not more government interference.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Carey Coleman will take action to grow jobs and strengthen the regional economy. He supports pro-growth tax policies, regulatory reform that lowers barriers for small businesses, workforce training tied directly to local employer needs, and reshoring critical manufacturing and supply chains. Carey b…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Jobs, trade, apprenticeships, and manufacturing
Candidate campaign source
Carey Coleman will take action to grow jobs and strengthen the regional economy. He supports pro-growth tax policies, regulatory reform that lowers barriers for small businesses, workforce training tied directly to local employer needs, and reshoring critical manufacturing and supply chains. Carey believes Ohio should be a national leader in advanced manufacturing, logistics, energy production, and skilled trades. He will fight for fair trade policies that protect American workers, expand apprenticeship programs, and create pathways for young people to build stable, high-wage careers without crushing student debt.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
This section matches specific electricity, fuels, energy costs and emissions terms in retained, attributed source text from published Ohio candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Ohio incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Ohio legislators and Ohio’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Ohio’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
21 matching sponsorships or proposals · 15 Ohio incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Adam C. Bird
Ohio House · District 63 · R–OH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Adam C. BirdOhio Legislature · HB 850
Temporarily reduce motor fuel tax rates
May 13, 2026 · In House Finance Committee
Rep. Ty D. Mathews · Sponsored / Rep. Adam C. Bird · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 850 proposes a three-month, 50% reduction in Ohio's motor-fuel tax rates, including a gasoline-rate reduction from 38.5 cents to 19.25 cents per gallon.
The House referred HB 850 to the Finance Committee on May 13, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 850 would temporarily reduce Ohio's gasoline tax from 38.5 cents to 19.25 cents per gallon and the other-motor-fuel rate from 47 cents to 23.5 cents for three months. Because EIA's retail estimate includes taxes, the proposal directly targets a component of the displayed pump price; it remained in the House Finance Committee and was not in effect for the August observation.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official bill page describes HB 850 as temporarily reducing motor-fuel tax rates and declaring an emergency.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. David J. TaylorU.S. Congress · Ohio delegation · H.R.3313
Protecting American Farmland Act
May 8, 2025 · Introduced
Rep. David J. Taylor · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's displayed renewable-generation share.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Hageman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concernedA BILLTo prohibit the head of a Federal agency from using Federal funds for certain solar energy projects that would result in the conversion of farmland, to exclude from certain tax credits relating…
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. David ThomasOhio Legislature · HB 832
Regards virtual net metering and meter aggregation
May 13, 2026 · Referred to committee — Energy
Rep. Tex Fischer · Sponsored / Rep. David Thomas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
The latest official Ohio Legislature record shows this action on May 13, 2026: Referred to committee — Energy.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's displayed renewable-generation share.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
To amend section 4928.67 and to enact sections 4928.675, 4928.676, 4928.677, 4928.678, 4928.679, 4928.6710, and 4928.6711 of the Revised Code regarding virtual net metering and meter aggregation.
Regards use of E15 blended fuel for state motor vehicles
May 20, 2026 · In House Transportation Committee
Rep. Josh Williams · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 931 proposes changing how compatible Ohio state vehicles use E15 blended gasoline when it is reasonably available and priced.
The House referred HB 931 to the Transportation Committee on May 20, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 931 concerns use of E15 blended gasoline in Ohio's state motor-vehicle fleet. It addresses state gasoline purchasing and blend demand, not the statewide per-gallon market price measured by EIA, and remained in the House Transportation Committee.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official long title says HB 931 concerns the use of E15 blended fuel for state motor vehicles.
Require E15 fuel at turnpike facilities; biodiesel fuel study
Mar 25, 2026 · In House Transportation Committee
Rep. Josh Williams · Sponsored / Rep. Roy Klopfenstein · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 773 proposes requiring E15 gasoline availability at Ohio Turnpike service facilities and studying biodiesel availability there.
The House referred HB 773 to the Transportation Committee on March 25, 2026.
Why this record is included
HB 773 would require E15 blended gasoline to be sold at Ohio Turnpike service facilities. It could change the availability and blend mix of gasoline at a limited set of locations, but it does not set statewide pump prices and remained in committee.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official long title says the bill would require the sale of E15 blended fuel at turnpike service facilities.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Marcy KapturU.S. Congress · Ohio delegation · H.R.9700
Ratepayer Justice and Commercial Power Accountability Act
Jul 16, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Marcy Kaptur · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4617)
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses electricity generation, renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on Ohio's displayed renewable-generation share.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Electricity generated from renewable resources. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Ratepayer Community Restoration Grants (a) Award of grants The Secretary of Energy shall award grants, which shall be known as Ratepayer Community Restoration Grants and without any matching requirement, in designated communities to local governments, regional development organizations, organizations described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or community development financial institutions. (b) Use of grants A Ratepayer Community Restoration Grant awarded to an entity described in…
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Riordan T. McClainOhio Legislature · HB 324
Temporarily authorize tax credit for sale of high-ethanol fuel
Feb 28, 2024 · Referred to Senate Ways and Means
Rep. Riordan T. McClain · Sponsored / Rep. Roy Klopfenstein · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 324 proposed a temporary retailer tax credit for higher-ethanol motor fuel after passing the Ohio House in February 2024.
The Senate referred HB 324 to the Ways and Means Committee on February 28, 2024; the measure did not become law before the General Assembly ended.
Why this record is included
HB 324 would have authorized a five-cent-per-gallon tax credit for retail sales of motor fuel containing 15% to 85% ethanol. The proposal addressed the retail supply and economics of gasoline-ethanol blends rather than setting Ohio's regular-gasoline price, and it did not become law in the 135th General Assembly.
Retained Ohio evidence context: Regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The official LSC analysis describes a five-cent-per-gallon credit for retail sales of motor fuel containing between 15% and 85% ethanol.
Only current Ohio officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Ohio statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 4, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Ohio snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Ohio, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.