Menu
New York · individual fact

New York real gross domestic product

New York’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$1.89T2025 · #3 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth2.5%2025 · #15 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$2.47T2025 · #3 of 50 · highest first

New York over time

Explore New York readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New York officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New York effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New York change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP New York · source units
New YorkPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $1.89T$0$13.32T$26.63TNew York, 2014: $1.54TNew York, 2015: $1.57TNew York, 2016: $1.59TNew York, 2017: $1.62TNew York, 2018: $1.67TNew York, 2019: $1.7TNew York, 2020: $1.66TNew York, 2021: $1.73TNew York, 2022: $1.76TNew York, 2023: $1.78TNew York, 2024: $1.85TNew York, 2025: $1.89T201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 30National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNew York · Sandy floods New York homes and transport infrastructure, with reported rescues and medical disruption · 2012-10-29New York SandyNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● New York Legislature · 822● U.S. Congress · New York delegation · 3◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ New York agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-06-30

11 of 11 reviewed New York actions match · 9 date markers shown. 30 major events shown separately.

New York · 2025: $1.89T · Rank #3 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New York Real GDP · source units
PeriodNew YorkRankU.S. benchmark
2025$1.89T#3 of 50$23.94T
2024$1.85T#3 of 50$23.39T
2023$1.78T#3 of 50$22.72T
2022$1.76T#3 of 50$22.08T
2021$1.73T#3 of 50$21.56T
2020$1.66T#3 of 50$20.28T
2019$1.7T#3 of 50$20.72T
2018$1.67T#3 of 50$20.19T
2017$1.62T#3 of 50$19.61T
2016$1.59T#3 of 50$19.14T
2015$1.57T#3 of 50$18.8T
2014$1.54T#3 of 50$18.26T
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis · BEA SASUMMARY, line 1 ↗
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New York · state comparison

New York output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

New York · 2025$1.89T
New York rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New York
Real GDP history in New York$-1.83T$12.74T$27.3T20142025
2025 · New York: $1.89T · Rank #3 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New York Real GDP history
PeriodNew YorkCompare
2014$1.54T
2015$1.57T
2016$1.59T
2017$1.62T
2018$1.67T
2019$1.7T
2020$1.66T
2021$1.73T
2022$1.76T
2023$1.78T
2024$1.85T
2025$1.89T

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New York stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New York has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New York · $1.89T2025 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New York with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York · your comparison$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis · BEA SASUMMARY, line 1 ↗
New York · state comparison

What makes up New York GDP?

Choose an industry to compare New York’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

New York · 2025$3.55B
New York rank#25among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New York
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in New York$-41.19B$147.96B$337.12B20142025
2025 · New York: $3.55B · Rank #25 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New York Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodNew YorkCompare
2014$3.36B
2015$2.66B
2016$2.46B
2017$2.82B
2018$2.54B
2019$2.9B
2020$2.7B
2021$3.73B
2022$5.23B
2023$3.8B
2024$3.57B
2025$3.55B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New York stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New York has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New York · $3.55B2025 · Rank #25 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New York with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York · your comparison$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis · BEA SAGDP2, line 3 ↗
New York · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

New York · 202513,498,360
New York rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New York
Total employment · jobs history in New York-19,102,045115,095,681249,293,40620142025
2025 · New York: 13,498,360 · Rank #4 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New York Total employment · jobs history
PeriodNew YorkCompare
201411,866,661
201512,100,039
201612,260,341
201712,392,912
201812,657,012
201912,747,921
202011,874,553
202112,230,693
202212,802,088
202313,074,894
202413,396,336
202513,498,360

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New York stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New York has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New York · 13,498,3602025 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New York with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York · your comparison13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis · BEA SASUMMARY, line 15 ↗
New York officeholders

Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.

11 of 11 reviewed New York actions · newest first

Jun 2, 2026 · S 1357 · Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings · referred to energy
New York Legislature · S 1357

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings

Jun 2, 2026 · referred to energy

Sen. Daniel G. Stec · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.

The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on June 2, 2026: referred to energy.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, natural-gas or renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed natural-gas generation share.

Retained New York evidence context: In-state electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Sen. Daniel G. Stec’s profile ↗
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑
Apr 28, 2026 · H.R.8563 · Investing in the American Dream Act · Introduced
U.S. Congress · New York delegation · H.R.8563

Investing in the American Dream Act

Apr 28, 2026 · Introduced

Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Definitions In this Act: (1) Covered loan The term covered loan means— (A) a loan guaranteed under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)); (B) a microloan under section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)); (C) a loan guaranteed under title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 et seq.); and (D) a surety bond guarantee from the Small Business Administration pursuant to part B of title IV of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 694a et seq.).…

Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on the displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained New York evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Definitions In this Act: (1) Covered loan The term covered loan means— (A) a loan guaranteed under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)); (B) a microloan under section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)); (C) a loan guaranteed under title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 et seq.); and (D) a surety bond guarantee from the Small Business Administration pursuant to part B of title IV of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 694a et seq.).…
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Open in FactVote →Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez’s profile ↗
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑
Jan 7, 2026 · A 864 · Establishes an immigrant integration advisory board for each economic development region · referred to economic development
New York Legislature · A 864

Establishes an immigrant integration advisory board for each economic development region

Jan 7, 2026 · referred to economic development

Asm. Phara Souffrant Forrest · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Directs the regional economic development council for each economic development region to establish an immigrant integration advisory board.

The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 7, 2026: referred to economic development.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on the displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained New York evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Directs the regional economic development council for each economic development region to establish an immigrant integration advisory board.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Asm. Phara Souffrant Forrest’s profile ↗
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑
Jan 7, 2026 · A 40 · Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings · referred to energy
New York Legislature · A 40

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings

Jan 7, 2026 · referred to energy

Asm. Scott Gray · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.

The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 7, 2026: referred to energy.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, natural-gas or renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed natural-gas generation share.

Retained New York evidence context: In-state electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Asm. Scott Gray’s profile ↗
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑
Oct 28, 2025 · H.R.5845 · Las Americas Energy Security Act · Introduced
U.S. Congress · New York delegation · H.R.5845

Las Americas Energy Security Act

Oct 28, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Adriano Espaillat · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Findings; purpose; statement of policy (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Energy independence and security are critical for a country to maintain its sovereignty, independence, and sustainable economic growth. (2) The International Energy Agency (IEA) defines energy security as the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price. (3) The IEA defines long-term energy security as primarily dealing with timely investments to supply energy in line with economic developments and…

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, natural-gas or renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed natural-gas generation share.

Retained New York evidence context: In-state electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Findings; purpose; statement of policy (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Energy independence and security are critical for a country to maintain its sovereignty, independence, and sustainable economic growth. (2) The International Energy Agency (IEA) defines energy security as the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price. (3) The IEA defines long-term energy security as primarily dealing with timely investments to supply energy in line with economic developments and…
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Open in FactVote →Rep. Adriano Espaillat’s profile ↗
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑
Jul 17, 2025 · H.R.4516 · Saving Lives and Taxpayer Dollars Act · Introduced
U.S. Congress · New York delegation · H.R.4516

Saving Lives and Taxpayer Dollars Act

Jul 17, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Gregory W. Meeks · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Foreign assistance commodities, including food, medicine, family planning products, and vaccines, provide critical support to people who are recovering from the aftermath of natural disasters, fleeing conflict or war, residing in refugee camps, or living in developing communities with limited access to health care. (2) United States investments in global health bolster economic growth for partner countries, produce returns on investment for the United States economy,…

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on the displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained New York evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Foreign assistance commodities, including food, medicine, family planning products, and vaccines, provide critical support to people who are recovering from the aftermath of natural disasters, fleeing conflict or war, residing in refugee camps, or living in developing communities with limited access to health care. (2) United States investments in global health bolster economic growth for partner countries, produce returns on investment for the United States economy,…
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Open in FactVote →Rep. Gregory W. Meeks’s profile ↗
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑
How New York action records are selected

Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified New York officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 3, 2026.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s New York candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

16 statements from 13 candidates

2026 New York State Comptroller — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Joseph Hernandez

3 statements

Republican · State Comptroller · NY

Economic growth & production context

Invest in New York by strengthening pension performance, cutting excessive Wall Street fees, and pursuing disciplined, market-driven investments that can create jobs and economic growth across the state.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: New Yorkers deserve a Comptroller who will protect their tax dollars, fight fraud, and invest in New York’s future.

Candidate campaign source

Invest in New York by strengthening pension performance, cutting excessive Wall Street fees, and pursuing disciplined, market-driven investments that can create jobs and economic growth across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joseph Hernandez — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Original source ↗
View 2 more statements from Joseph Hernandez
Economic growth & production context

Hernandez will pursue the creation of a $10 billion Empire Opportunity Fund to identify competitive investment opportunities connected to New York businesses, industries, infrastructure, and economic growth, while maintaining the Comptroller’s fiduciary responsibility to retirees.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Create the Empire Opportunity Fund

Candidate campaign source

Hernandez will pursue the creation of a $10 billion Empire Opportunity Fund to identify competitive investment opportunities connected to New York businesses, industries, infrastructure, and economic growth, while maintaining the Comptroller’s fiduciary responsibility to retirees.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joseph Hernandez — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Original source ↗
Economic growth & production context

When strong opportunities exist in New York, New York capital should have the opportunity to invest in them—from advanced manufacturing and technology to energy, life sciences, logistics, and other industries capable of creating jobs and long-term economic growth.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Create the Empire Opportunity Fund

Candidate campaign source

When strong opportunities exist in New York, New York capital should have the opportunity to invest in them—from advanced manufacturing and technology to energy, life sciences, logistics, and other industries capable of creating jobs and long-term economic growth.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joseph Hernandez — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Original source ↗
Candidate profile →

2026 New York U.S. House District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Christopher J. Gallant

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · NY

Economic growth & production context

Modernize transit to improve LIRR reliability, reduce commuting costs, and support local economic growth.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: B) Built To Last: Modernize Critical Infrastructure

Candidate campaign source

Modernize transit to improve LIRR reliability, reduce commuting costs, and support local economic growth.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Christopher J. Gallant — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Original source ↗
Candidate profile →

2026 New York U.S. House District 10 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Brad Lander

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 10 · NY

Economic growth & production context

The number of billionaires has grown ten-fold in recent decades, taking the lion’s share of economic growth, while working people’s incomes have languished, and the cost of housing, health care, child care, energy, and food has skyrocketed. Brad believes that we must boldly confront wealth inequalit…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Bridges, Not Bombs

Candidate campaign source

The number of billionaires has grown ten-fold in recent decades, taking the lion’s share of economic growth, while working people’s incomes have languished, and the cost of housing, health care, child care, energy, and food has skyrocketed. Brad believes that we must boldly confront wealth inequality if we are going to bring relief to working families from a relentless affordability crisis — and also to prevent the dangerous concentration of power in a tiny number of hands. Unlike Dan Goldman, Brad has consistently supported efforts to tax the rich in Albany, including this year’s efforts by Mayor Mamdani, which resulted in the pied-a-terre tax agreement which is helping to fund Governor Hochul and Mayor Mamdani’s commitment to universal child care. Brad strongly supports Senator Elizabeth Warren’s Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act to tax the net wealth of households with over $50 million in wealth (2-cents over $50 million), and an even more aggressive ultra-wealth tax on fortunes over $1 billion. He also supports Equal Tax Act, which equalizes tax rates for capital gains and ordinary income over $1 million.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 19, 2026

Brad Lander campaign source 2 ↗
Original source ↗
Candidate profile →
Race groups · Page 1 of 4
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published New York candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New York incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New York legislators and New York’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New York’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

11 matching sponsorships or proposals · 7 New York incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Asm. Phara Souffrant Forrest

New York State Assembly · District 57 · –NY

2 proposals
View proposals from Asm. Phara Souffrant Forrest
New York Legislature · A 864

Establishes an immigrant integration advisory board for each economic development region

Jan 7, 2026 · referred to economic development

Asm. Phara Souffrant Forrest · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Directs the regional economic development council for each economic development region to establish an immigrant integration advisory board.

The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 7, 2026: referred to economic development.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on the displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained New York evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Directs the regional economic development council for each economic development region to establish an immigrant integration advisory board.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Asm. Phara Souffrant Forrest’s profile ↗
New York Legislature · A 8406

Establishes an immigrant integration advisory board for each economic development region

Jan 3, 2024 · referred to economic development

Asm. Phara Souffrant Forrest · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Directs the regional economic development council for each economic development region to establish an immigrant integration advisory board.

The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 3, 2024: referred to economic development.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on the displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained New York evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Directs the regional economic development council for each economic development region to establish an immigrant integration advisory board.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Asm. Phara Souffrant Forrest’s profile ↗

Asm. Scott Gray

New York State Assembly · District 116 · –NY

2 proposals
View proposals from Asm. Scott Gray
New York Legislature · A 40

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings

Jan 7, 2026 · referred to energy

Asm. Scott Gray · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.

The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 7, 2026: referred to energy.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, natural-gas or renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed natural-gas generation share.

Retained New York evidence context: In-state electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Asm. Scott Gray’s profile ↗
New York Legislature · A 2918

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings

Jan 3, 2024 · referred to energy

Asm. Scott Gray · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.

The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on January 3, 2024: referred to energy.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, natural-gas or renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed natural-gas generation share.

Retained New York evidence context: In-state electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Asm. Scott Gray’s profile ↗

Rep. Adriano Espaillat

U.S. representative for New York, District 13 · D–NY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Adriano Espaillat
U.S. Congress · New York delegation · H.R.5845

Las Americas Energy Security Act

Oct 28, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Adriano Espaillat · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Findings; purpose; statement of policy (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Energy independence and security are critical for a country to maintain its sovereignty, independence, and sustainable economic growth. (2) The International Energy Agency (IEA) defines energy security as the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price. (3) The IEA defines long-term energy security as primarily dealing with timely investments to supply energy in line with economic developments and…

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, natural-gas or renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed natural-gas generation share.

Retained New York evidence context: In-state electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Findings; purpose; statement of policy (a) Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Energy independence and security are critical for a country to maintain its sovereignty, independence, and sustainable economic growth. (2) The International Energy Agency (IEA) defines energy security as the uninterrupted availability of energy sources at an affordable price. (3) The IEA defines long-term energy security as primarily dealing with timely investments to supply energy in line with economic developments and…
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Open in FactVote →Rep. Adriano Espaillat’s profile ↗

Rep. Gregory W. Meeks

U.S. representative for New York, District 5 · D–NY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Gregory W. Meeks
U.S. Congress · New York delegation · H.R.4516

Saving Lives and Taxpayer Dollars Act

Jul 17, 2025 · Introduced

Rep. Gregory W. Meeks · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Foreign assistance commodities, including food, medicine, family planning products, and vaccines, provide critical support to people who are recovering from the aftermath of natural disasters, fleeing conflict or war, residing in refugee camps, or living in developing communities with limited access to health care. (2) United States investments in global health bolster economic growth for partner countries, produce returns on investment for the United States economy,…

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on the displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained New York evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Findings Congress finds the following: (1) Foreign assistance commodities, including food, medicine, family planning products, and vaccines, provide critical support to people who are recovering from the aftermath of natural disasters, fleeing conflict or war, residing in refugee camps, or living in developing communities with limited access to health care. (2) United States investments in global health bolster economic growth for partner countries, produce returns on investment for the United States economy,…
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Open in FactVote →Rep. Gregory W. Meeks’s profile ↗

Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez

U.S. representative for New York, District 7 · D–NY

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez
U.S. Congress · New York delegation · H.R.8563

Investing in the American Dream Act

Apr 28, 2026 · Introduced

Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Definitions In this Act: (1) Covered loan The term covered loan means— (A) a loan guaranteed under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)); (B) a microloan under section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)); (C) a loan guaranteed under title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 et seq.); and (D) a surety bond guarantee from the Small Business Administration pursuant to part B of title IV of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 694a et seq.).…

Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on the displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained New York evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Definitions In this Act: (1) Covered loan The term covered loan means— (A) a loan guaranteed under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)); (B) a microloan under section 7(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)); (C) a loan guaranteed under title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 et seq.); and (D) a surety bond guarantee from the Small Business Administration pursuant to part B of title IV of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 694a et seq.).…
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Open in FactVote →Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez’s profile ↗

Sen. Daniel G. Stec

New York State Senate · District 45 · R–NY

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Daniel G. Stec
New York Legislature · S 1357

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings

Jun 2, 2026 · referred to energy

Sen. Daniel G. Stec · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.

The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on June 2, 2026: referred to energy.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, natural-gas or renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed natural-gas generation share.

Retained New York evidence context: In-state electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Sen. Daniel G. Stec’s profile ↗
New York Legislature · S 4876

Relates to the amount of St. Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.

Jun 16, 2023 · In Assembly Committee

Sen. Daniel G. Stec · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses electricity generation, natural-gas or renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability.

The latest official New York Legislature record shows this action on June 16, 2023: In Assembly Committee.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses electricity generation, natural-gas or renewable power, storage, utilities, interconnection, or grid reliability. It does not establish an effect on New York's displayed natural-gas generation share.

Retained New York evidence context: In-state electricity generated from natural gas. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Lawrence county economic development power that may be used by the New York Power Authority to generate net earnings and authority-TMED contracts.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Official record ↗Sen. Daniel G. Stec’s profile ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New York officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New York statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 3, 2026.

Sources & methods

Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.

#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.

New York snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to New York, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.

Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.

← All New York individual facts