New Mexico · individual fact

New Mexico unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate4.1%2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents941,3132024 · #38 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer1.6%2025 · 11-month average · #16 of 50 · highest first

New Mexico over time

Explore New Mexico readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Mexico officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Mexico effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Mexico change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate New Mexico · source units
New MexicoPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 4.1%2.7%5.8%8.9%New Mexico, 2015: 6.6%New Mexico, 2016: 6.8%New Mexico, 2017: 6.1%New Mexico, 2018: 4.9%New Mexico, 2019: 5%New Mexico, 2020: 7.9%New Mexico, 2021: 7.1%New Mexico, 2022: 4.1%New Mexico, 2023: 3.7%New Mexico, 2024: 4.1%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 15National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● New Mexico Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 1■ New Mexico agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2015-12-012026-09-30

4 of 4 reviewed New Mexico actions match · 4 date markers shown. 15 major events shown separately.

New Mexico · 2024: 4.1% · Rank #14 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New Mexico Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodNew MexicoRankU.S. benchmark
20244.1%#14 of 504%
20233.7%#14 of 50Not available
20224.1%#9 of 50Not available
20217.1%#2 of 50Not available
20207.9%#18 of 50Not available
20195%#3 of 50Not available
20184.9%#3 of 50Not available
20176.1%#2 of 50Not available
20166.8%#1 of 50Not available
20156.6%#2 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New Mexico · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

New Mexico · 20244.1%
New Mexico rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Annual unemployment rate history in New Mexico3.1%5.8%8.5%20152024
2024 · New Mexico: 4.1% · Rank #14 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
20156.6%
20166.8%
20176.1%
20184.9%
20195%
20207.9%
20217.1%
20224.1%
20233.7%
20244.1%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 4.1%2024 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico · your comparison4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

New Mexico · 2025 · 11-month average1.6%
New Mexico rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 1.6%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico · your comparison1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

New Mexico · 20251.8%
New Mexico rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Annual real GDP growth history in New Mexico-4.5%4.1%12.7%20152025
2025 · New Mexico: 1.8% · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
20151%
2016-0.5%
20170.2%
20183.1%
20194.4%
2020-2.5%
20213.2%
20223.3%
202310.7%
20244.3%
20251.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 1.8%2025 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico · your comparison1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

New Mexico · December 202532,000
New Mexico rank#39among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Openings · number history in New Mexico-1,038,7003,601,0008,240,700July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · New Mexico: 32,000 · Rank #39 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Openings · number history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
July 202542,000
August 202542,000
September 202538,000
October 202539,000
November 202537,000
December 202532,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 32,000December 2025 · Rank #39 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico · your comparison32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s New Mexico candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

26 statements from 7 candidates

2026 New Mexico Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 9 statements

Deb Haaland

2 statements

Democratic · Governor · NM

Jobs & workforce context

Invest in more renewable energy to create jobs, lower energy costs, and make New Mexico the energy capital of the country.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Invest in more renewable energy to create jobs, lower energy costs, and make New Mexico the energy capital of the country.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Deb Haaland
Jobs & workforce context

“I understand what it’s like to not be able to make ends meet despite working multiple jobs – it shouldn’t be this way. We need to make groceries, housing, and health care more affordable.” New Mexicans are struggling to make ends meet – they are doing everything right and still can’t get by. Deb kn…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

“I understand what it’s like to not be able to make ends meet despite working multiple jobs – it shouldn’t be this way. We need to make groceries, housing, and health care more affordable.” New Mexicans are struggling to make ends meet – they are doing everything right and still can’t get by. Deb knows this firsthand – she relied on benefits like SNAP, WIC, and Medicaid and moved forward after starting her own business selling salsa. New Mexicans need higher wages and lower bills, cheaper rent, and a stronger economy. We have the potential to lead in tech, energy, film, and our outdoor economy. Deb will create jobs and deliver on making New Mexico more affordable.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Gregg Hull

7 statements

Republican · Governor · NM

Jobs & workforce context

A growing economy also requires a workforce ready to step into real jobs. My plan focuses on clear, practical pathways from education into careers. That includes expanding high-quality career and technical education in high schools so students can graduate with industry-recognized certifications and…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

A growing economy also requires a workforce ready to step into real jobs. My plan focuses on clear, practical pathways from education into careers. That includes expanding high-quality career and technical education in high schools so students can graduate with industry-recognized certifications and move directly into the workforce, apprenticeships, or further training.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗
View 6 more statements from Gregg Hull
Jobs & workforce context

I will push for a long-term funding commitment to make police pay competitive with neighboring states, tied to clear recruitment and retention goals so taxpayers see real results. I also support expanding grant programs that help cities and counties cover the cost of hiring new officers over several…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

I will push for a long-term funding commitment to make police pay competitive with neighboring states, tied to clear recruitment and retention goals so taxpayers see real results. I also support expanding grant programs that help cities and counties cover the cost of hiring new officers over several years, allowing departments to rebuild without sudden budget shocks.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

At the same time, New Mexico must remove unnecessary barriers that keep skilled workers from getting to work. Overly complex occupational licensing rules slow hiring, discourage relocation, and make it harder to start or expand a small business. In health care, the trades, and service industries, qu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

At the same time, New Mexico must remove unnecessary barriers that keep skilled workers from getting to work. Overly complex occupational licensing rules slow hiring, discourage relocation, and make it harder to start or expand a small business. In health care, the trades, and service industries, qualified professionals often face months-long delays that push them to work in other states.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

The same issue affects the trades and service industries. Barbers, salon workers, contractors, and technicians face delays and requirements that slow down hiring and make it harder to start or expand small businesses. These are jobs that support families and serve local communities, and there is no …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

The same issue affects the trades and service industries. Barbers, salon workers, contractors, and technicians face delays and requirements that slow down hiring and make it harder to start or expand small businesses. These are jobs that support families and serve local communities, and there is no good reason for people to wait months before they can earn a paycheck.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

It also means aligning education and training with real employer needs through stronger coordination between high schools, community colleges, universities, employers, and workforce agencies. Students and working adults should be able to see a clear path into careers that offer good pay and long-ter…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

It also means aligning education and training with real employer needs through stronger coordination between high schools, community colleges, universities, employers, and workforce agencies. Students and working adults should be able to see a clear path into careers that offer good pay and long-term growth, whether that path runs through a classroom, a shop floor, or an apprenticeship.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

My plan focuses on getting people to work faster without compromising safety. I support full license reciprocity for professionals who are already licensed in good standing in another state, unless there is a clear and proven public safety concern. This change alone would immediately expand the work…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

My plan focuses on getting people to work faster without compromising safety. I support full license reciprocity for professionals who are already licensed in good standing in another state, unless there is a clear and proven public safety concern. This change alone would immediately expand the workforce by allowing qualified doctors, nurses, tradespeople, and technicians to begin work without unnecessary delay.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

My plan starts with stabilizing New Mexico’s law enforcement workforce. Police departments across the state are understaffed and stretched thin, with serious recruitment and retention challenges. Vacancy rates in some communities make effective policing nearly impossible, placing added strain on the…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and justice

Candidate campaign source

My plan starts with stabilizing New Mexico’s law enforcement workforce. Police departments across the state are understaffed and stretched thin, with serious recruitment and retention challenges. Vacancy rates in some communities make effective policing nearly impossible, placing added strain on the officers who remain and limiting proactive crime prevention.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 New Mexico State Auditor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Joseph Maestas

1 statement

Democratic · State Auditor · NM

Jobs & workforce context

✓ Tackle the CPA Workforce ShortageNew Mexico is facing a critical shortage of licensed auditors and CPAs. We’ll expand partnerships with universities and firms to build a more robust, diverse pipeline—equipping the next generation of professionals to safeguard public dollars.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Our Next Chapter: Priorities for a Stronger, Smarter Government

Candidate campaign source

✓ Tackle the CPA Workforce ShortageNew Mexico is facing a critical shortage of licensed auditors and CPAs. We’ll expand partnerships with universities and firms to build a more robust, diverse pipeline—equipping the next generation of professionals to safeguard public dollars.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Joseph Maestas — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 New Mexico U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Didi Okpareke

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · NM

Jobs & workforce context

Didi will fight for New Mexico's businesses and workers, advocating at every turn to bring federal investments and programs here that create jobs, grow paychecks, and stimulate the economy. Prosperity instead of poverty.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Didi will fight for New Mexico's businesses and workers, advocating at every turn to bring federal investments and programs here that create jobs, grow paychecks, and stimulate the economy. Prosperity instead of poverty.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Didi Okpareke — candidate-owned primary source ↗
View 1 more statement from Didi Okpareke
Jobs & workforce context

Advocate for federal investments and programs that create jobs, increase paychecks, and stimulate New Mexico's economy.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Jobs and Investment

Candidate campaign source

Advocate for federal investments and programs that create jobs, increase paychecks, and stimulate New Mexico's economy.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Didi Okpareke — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Mexico candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New Mexico incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Mexico legislators and New Mexico’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Mexico’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 New Mexico incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Cristina Parajón

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 25 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Cristina Parajón
New Mexico Legislature · HB 124

NEW AMERICANS DIVISION IN WSD

Mar 9, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 61

Cristina Parajón · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 124 creates a New Americans Division in the Workforce Solutions Department. The act defines new Americans as U.S. residents who are not citizens or were not citizens at birth; it does not impose a recent-arrival requirement. The reviewed section directs workforce and educational initiatives, identification of professional-licensing pathways, support for employers and economic sectors, and an information center that includes assistance to eligible lawful permanent residents seeking naturalization. The division’s report is due August 1, 2027, then July 1 each year, covering the preceding twelve months. These duties do not themselves grant citizenship, employment or a professional license.

Signed by Governor on 2026-03-09, Chapter 61 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. Section 9-26-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 3) is amended to read: "9-26-3. DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Workforce Solutions Department Act: A. "department" means the workforce solutions department; B. "new Americans" means people residing in the United States who are not citizens of the United States or who were not citizens of the United States at birth; and C. "secretary" means the secretary of workforce solutions." SECTION 2. Section 9-26-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 4) is amended to read: "9-26-4. WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS DEPARTMENT CREATED.--The "workforce solutions department" is created in the executive branch pursuant to the Executive Reorganization Act. The department is a cabinet department that includes: A. the office of the secretary; B. the administrative services division; C. the unemployment insurance division; D. the labor relations division; E. the workforce technology division; F. the workforce transition services division; and G. the new Americans division." SECTION 3. A new section of the Workforce Solutions Department Act is enacted to read: "NEW AMERICANS DIVISION--PURPOSE--DUTIES.-- A. The purpose of the new Americans division of the department is to support new Americans residing in New Mexico in achieving their maximum economic potential in New Mexico's workforce and as entrepreneurs. In furtherance of this purpose, the division shall: (1) support and expand educational, workforce training and other initiatives that improve the integration of new Americans into the state's economy; (2) identify strategies for improving licensure pathways for new Americans who have been professionally trained or licensed in another country; (3) assist businesses that employ new Americans by identifying, attracting and retaining top global talent required to remain competitive in a global economy; (4) identify and support pathways for new Americans to advance priority sectors identified in the state's workforce development and economic development plans; and (5) serve as an information center by providing resources and engagement opportunities to businesses, community-based organizations, workers, community members, state agencies and local governments on policies and legislation affecting new Americans, including supporting eligible lawful permanent residents in becoming naturalized United States citizens. B. The new Americans division shall, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the department, work with other divisions within the department, the economic development department, the higher education department, the public education department, the department of health, the health care authority, the homeland security and emergency management department, the department of public safety or the regulation and licensing department to fulfill the duties of the new Americans division. C. By August 1, 2027, and by July 1 of each year thereafter, the new Americans division shall provide a report to an interim committee that studies economic and rural development and policy, the secretary, the governor and members of the legislature on the activities of the division in the preceding twelve months, including an analysis of the economic impact, status, population and workforce numbers of new Americans in the state."
Review official supporting evidence ↗

G. Andrés Romero

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 10 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from G. Andrés Romero
New Mexico Legislature · HB 171

SCHOOL GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS

Feb 9, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 2

G. Andrés Romero · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed HB 171 graduation provisions apply beginning with students entering ninth grade in 2025–2026. They require at least 24 units with specified English, mathematics, science, social-science, physical-education, health and elective components, including two locally set units. Algebra 2 must be offered but is not a required unit in the new sequence. The text allows qualifying career and work-based courses and requires transfer acceptance of earned local units. These requirements concern future graduates, not proof of an increase in already measured adult attainment.

Signed by Governor on 2024-02-09, Chapter 2 of the 2024 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact measures diploma-or-higher attainment among adults age 25 and older. Programs for younger students concern a possible future component of adult attainment rather than the previously measured population. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

O. Beginning with students entering the ninth grade in the 2025-2026 school year, successful completion of a minimum of twenty-four units aligned to the state academic content and performance standards shall be required for graduation and the award of a diploma of excellence. These units shall be as follows: (1) four units in English, which shall include a three-unit sequence; provided that department- approved work-based learning, career technical education or English language development courses that meet state English or English language development academic content and performance standards may qualify as required English units; (2) four units in mathematics, two of which shall include a sequence of algebra 1 and geometry or another integrated pathway of mathematics equivalent to algebra 1 and geometry; provided that financial literacy courses or department-approved work-based learning or career technical education courses that meet state mathematics academic content and performance standards may qualify as required mathematics units; and provided further that algebra 2 shall be offered as a mathematics course; (3) three units in science, two of which shall have a laboratory component; provided that department- approved work-based learning or career technical education courses that meet state science academic content and performance standards may qualify as required science units; (4) four units in social science, which shall include United States history and geography, which course content contains New Mexico history; government and economics and personal financial literacy, which course content contains civics; and world history and geography; (5) one unit in physical education, as determined by the school district or charter school, which may include a physical education program that meets state academic content and performance standards or participation in marching band, dance programs, junior reserve officers' training corps or interscholastic sports sanctioned by the New Mexico activities association or any other co-curricular physical activity; (6) one-half unit in health education; provided that this one-half unit may be earned in either middle or high school; (7) five and one-half elective units that meet department academic content and performance standards and that shall include a two-unit pathway concentration of the student's choice in a language other than English, including American sign language; fine arts; health; military career preparation; a career technical education program; or community or service learning, a capstone course or work- based learning; provided that financial literacy, computer science, student service learning, career technical education courses and a sequence of languages other than English shall be offered as electives; and provided further that media literacy and pre-apprenticeship programs may be offered as electives; and (8) two units set by each local school board or governing body of a charter school that meet department academic content and performance standards. P. If a high school student who has taken one or both units provided in Paragraph (8) of Subsection O of this section moves from one school district or charter school to another, the receiving school district or charter school shall accept those earned units toward the student's graduation.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Patricia Roybal Caballero

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 13 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Patricia Roybal Caballero
New Mexico Legislature · HB 246

INCREASE MINIMUM WAGE

Feb 14, 2025 · Action postponed indefinitely

Patricia Roybal Caballero · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed introduced section 2 of HB 246 proposed a $17 hourly minimum wage beginning January 1, 2026, followed by annual adjustments from 2027 using the January 2026 wage multiplied by the ratio of the prior September’s CPI to September 2025 CPI, with no downward adjustment. It would replace the prior wage and tipped-wage schedules in that section, as well as the stated agricultural food, utilities, supplies and housing deduction. Employer notice of the next year’s rate would be due each November 1 beginning in 2026. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely; the proposed $17 rate is not presented as enacted or as measured household-income growth.

The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Census household money income is measured before taxes and includes wages and specified cash benefits. Minimum-wage provisions concern earnings; tax credits and in-kind benefits are not themselves increases in this statistic. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Section 50-4-22 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1955, Chapter 200, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read: "50-4-22. MINIMUM WAGES.-- A. On and after January 1, 2026, an employer shall pay to an employee a minimum wage rate of seventeen dollars ($17.00) an hour adjusted annually pursuant to the provisions of Subsection C of this section. B. An employee shall not be required to work more than forty hours in any week of seven days, unless the employee is paid one and one-half times the employee's regular hourly rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours. For an employee who is paid a fixed salary for fluctuating hours and who is employed by an employer a majority of whose business in New Mexico consists of providing investigative services to the federal government, the hourly rate may be calculated in accordance with the provisions of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the regulations pursuant to that act; provided that in no case shall the hourly rate be less than the federal minimum wage. C. On January 1, 2027 and on January 1 of each successive year, the minimum wage rate shall be adjusted by multiplying the minimum wage as of January 1, 2026 by a fraction, the numerator of which is the consumer price index ending in September of the previous year and the denominator of which is the consumer price index ending September 2025; provided that the minimum wage rate shall not be adjusted downward as a result of a decrease in the consumer price index. By November 1, 2026 and by November 1 of each successive year, the workforce solutions department shall post on its website and otherwise notify employers of the minimum wage for the next year."
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New Mexico officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Mexico statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.