New Mexico · individual fact

New Mexico real gross domestic product

New Mexico’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$122.58B2025 · #37 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth1.8%2025 · #31 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$152.12B2025 · #37 of 50 · highest first

New Mexico over time

Explore New Mexico readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Mexico officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Mexico effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Mexico change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP New Mexico · source units
New MexicoPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $122.58B$0$13.4T$26.81TNew Mexico, 2014: $92.62BNew Mexico, 2015: $93.5BNew Mexico, 2016: $93.04BNew Mexico, 2017: $93.21BNew Mexico, 2018: $96.06BNew Mexico, 2019: $100.32BNew Mexico, 2020: $97.83BNew Mexico, 2021: $100.93BNew Mexico, 2022: $104.22BNew Mexico, 2023: $115.4BNew Mexico, 2024: $120.39BNew Mexico, 2025: $122.58B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 29National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● New Mexico Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 1■ New Mexico agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-03-31

2 of 2 reviewed New Mexico actions match · 2 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.

New Mexico · 2025: $122.58B · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New Mexico Real GDP · source units
PeriodNew MexicoRankU.S. benchmark
2025$122.58B#37 of 50$23.94T
2024$120.39B#37 of 50$23.39T
2023$115.4B#37 of 50$22.72T
2022$104.22B#37 of 50$22.08T
2021$100.93B#37 of 50$21.56T
2020$97.83B#37 of 50$20.28T
2019$100.32B#37 of 50$20.72T
2018$96.06B#37 of 50$20.19T
2017$93.21B#37 of 50$19.61T
2016$93.04B#37 of 50$19.14T
2015$93.5B#37 of 50$18.8T
2014$92.62B#37 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New Mexico · state comparison

New Mexico output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

New Mexico · 2025$122.58B
New Mexico rank#37among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Real GDP history in New Mexico$-3.48T$12.02T$27.52T20142025
2025 · New Mexico: $122.58B · Rank #37 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Real GDP history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
2014$92.62B
2015$93.5B
2016$93.04B
2017$93.21B
2018$96.06B
2019$100.32B
2020$97.83B
2021$100.93B
2022$104.22B
2023$115.4B
2024$120.39B
2025$122.58B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · $122.58B2025 · Rank #37 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico · your comparison$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

What makes up New Mexico GDP?

Choose an industry to compare New Mexico’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

New Mexico · 2025$1.7B
New Mexico rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in New Mexico$-42.64B$147.33B$337.31B20142025
2025 · New Mexico: $1.7B · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
2014$1.6B
2015$1.32B
2016$1.41B
2017$1.44B
2018$1.36B
2019$1.39B
2020$1.2B
2021$1.37B
2022$2.15B
2023$1.82B
2024$1.68B
2025$1.7B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · $1.7B2025 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico · your comparison$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

New Mexico · 20251,183,906
New Mexico rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Total employment · jobs history in New Mexico-31,517,173109,697,799250,912,77020142025
2025 · New Mexico: 1,183,906 · Rank #38 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Total employment · jobs history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
20141,083,693
20151,092,682
20161,092,950
20171,096,240
20181,111,563
20191,117,967
20201,070,897
20211,093,559
20221,133,727
20231,158,756
20241,178,102
20251,183,906

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 1,183,9062025 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico · your comparison1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s New Mexico candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

10 statements from 5 candidates

2026 New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Michael Perry

2 statements

Republican · Commissioner of Public Lands · NM

Economic growth & production context

Michael believes in active land stewardship through conservation not passive preservation. While preservation often seeks to lock land away from use, conservation balances ecological health with economic productivity and public access. Michael supports land policies that allow for responsible grazin…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural policy

Candidate campaign source

Michael believes in active land stewardship through conservation not passive preservation. While preservation often seeks to lock land away from use, conservation balances ecological health with economic productivity and public access. Michael supports land policies that allow for responsible grazing, recreation, energy development, and habitat restoration ensuring that our lands remain productive, resilient, and available to future generations. His boots-on-the-ground experience has shown that active management is the best path forward for New Mexico's diverse and dynamic landscapes.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Michael Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Michael Perry
Economic growth & production context

Use active conservation that balances ecological health with grazing, recreation, energy development, habitat restoration, economic productivity, and public access.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Conservation

Candidate campaign source

Use active conservation that balances ecological health with grazing, recreation, energy development, habitat restoration, economic productivity, and public access.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Michael Perry — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 New Mexico Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Gregg Hull

2 statements

Republican · Governor · NM

Economic growth & production context

New Mexico struggles to attract and keep skilled workers, and one major reason is unnecessary red tape. Too many people who want to work here are blocked by long, confusing licensing rules that make it harder to move, start a job, or open a small business. I believe these barriers hurt families, lim…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

New Mexico struggles to attract and keep skilled workers, and one major reason is unnecessary red tape. Too many people who want to work here are blocked by long, confusing licensing rules that make it harder to move, start a job, or open a small business. I believe these barriers hurt families, limit opportunity, and slow economic growth.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 12 ↗
View 1 more statement from Gregg Hull
Economic growth & production context

Reliability affects economic growth as well. Large employers, including data centers and manufacturers, look first at whether a state can provide steady power and water. Right now, New Mexico is often passed over because we cannot supply the necessary power. Improving our grid strength and planning …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Reliability affects economic growth as well. Large employers, including data centers and manufacturers, look first at whether a state can provide steady power and water. Right now, New Mexico is often passed over because we cannot supply the necessary power. Improving our grid strength and planning for the future will create opportunities for investment and high-paying jobs, especially in rural areas.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gregg Hull — candidate-owned primary source 11 ↗

2026 New Mexico U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Martin Zamora

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 3 · NM

Economic growth & production context

Support economic development that enhances—not erodes—traditional rural values and culture

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

Support economic development that enhances—not erodes—traditional rural values and culture

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Martin Zamora — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
View 1 more statement from Martin Zamora
Economic growth & production context

Support economic development that preserves traditional rural culture and values.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Rural Development

Candidate campaign source

Support economic development that preserves traditional rural culture and values.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Martin Zamora — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · NM

Economic growth & production context

Immigrants bring invaluable talent and energy to communities in New Mexico and across the United States. Many leave everything they love behind in search of a better life for their families. They care for our elderly, pick and prepare our food, and are incredible entrepreneurs making our economy str…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Immigration and border policy

Government-published candidate material

Immigrants bring invaluable talent and energy to communities in New Mexico and across the United States. Many leave everything they love behind in search of a better life for their families. They care for our elderly, pick and prepare our food, and are incredible entrepreneurs making our economy stronger and more vibrant. Indeed, we know that immigration boosts the U.S. economy and will grow our economy by more than $7 trillion over the next decade. Yet, our immigration system is broken. It provides few—and sometimes impossible—options to attain lawful immigration status. I believe we must pass comprehensive immigration reform so that our country can remain that beacon of hope and maintain and improve border security.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teresa Leger Fernández — official government primary source 10 ↗
View 2 more statements from Teresa Leger Fernández
Economic growth & production context

In New Mexico, one in ten paychecks are tied to the creative economy. We know how the arts can spur economic growth and enhance our culture. That’s why I introduced the Creative Workforce Investment Act to support arts and creative workforce initiatives that create publicly accessible art while empl…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economic Prosperity

Government-published candidate material

In New Mexico, one in ten paychecks are tied to the creative economy. We know how the arts can spur economic growth and enhance our culture. That’s why I introduced the Creative Workforce Investment Act to support arts and creative workforce initiatives that create publicly accessible art while employing individuals in the local community.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teresa Leger Fernández — official government primary source 5 ↗
Economic growth & production context

I am committed to spurring new economic development across New Mexico. I cosponsored and helped pass the Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act. I also convened a roundtable with small business owners and Los Alamos National Lab officials to discuss how to create new businesses. This…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Government-published candidate material

I am committed to spurring new economic development across New Mexico. I cosponsored and helped pass the Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act. I also convened a roundtable with small business owners and Los Alamos National Lab officials to discuss how to create new businesses. This builds on the fiscal year 2024 funding bill that includes my initiative to support the commercialization of technologies from the national labs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teresa Leger Fernández — official government primary source 5 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Mexico candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New Mexico incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Mexico legislators and New Mexico’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Mexico’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 New Mexico incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.

Cristina Parajón

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 25 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Cristina Parajón
New Mexico Legislature · HB 124

NEW AMERICANS DIVISION IN WSD

Mar 9, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 61

Cristina Parajón · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 124 creates a New Americans Division in the Workforce Solutions Department. The act defines new Americans as U.S. residents who are not citizens or were not citizens at birth; it does not impose a recent-arrival requirement. The reviewed section directs workforce and educational initiatives, identification of professional-licensing pathways, support for employers and economic sectors, and an information center that includes assistance to eligible lawful permanent residents seeking naturalization. The division’s report is due August 1, 2027, then July 1 each year, covering the preceding twelve months. These duties do not themselves grant citizenship, employment or a professional license.

Signed by Governor on 2026-03-09, Chapter 61 of the 2026 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and both lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. The reviewed immigration provisions address subsets of this population and do not change birthplace or determine any particular resident’s status. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. Section 9-26-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 3) is amended to read: "9-26-3. DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Workforce Solutions Department Act: A. "department" means the workforce solutions department; B. "new Americans" means people residing in the United States who are not citizens of the United States or who were not citizens of the United States at birth; and C. "secretary" means the secretary of workforce solutions." SECTION 2. Section 9-26-4 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2007, Chapter 200, Section 4) is amended to read: "9-26-4. WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS DEPARTMENT CREATED.--The "workforce solutions department" is created in the executive branch pursuant to the Executive Reorganization Act. The department is a cabinet department that includes: A. the office of the secretary; B. the administrative services division; C. the unemployment insurance division; D. the labor relations division; E. the workforce technology division; F. the workforce transition services division; and G. the new Americans division." SECTION 3. A new section of the Workforce Solutions Department Act is enacted to read: "NEW AMERICANS DIVISION--PURPOSE--DUTIES.-- A. The purpose of the new Americans division of the department is to support new Americans residing in New Mexico in achieving their maximum economic potential in New Mexico's workforce and as entrepreneurs. In furtherance of this purpose, the division shall: (1) support and expand educational, workforce training and other initiatives that improve the integration of new Americans into the state's economy; (2) identify strategies for improving licensure pathways for new Americans who have been professionally trained or licensed in another country; (3) assist businesses that employ new Americans by identifying, attracting and retaining top global talent required to remain competitive in a global economy; (4) identify and support pathways for new Americans to advance priority sectors identified in the state's workforce development and economic development plans; and (5) serve as an information center by providing resources and engagement opportunities to businesses, community-based organizations, workers, community members, state agencies and local governments on policies and legislation affecting new Americans, including supporting eligible lawful permanent residents in becoming naturalized United States citizens. B. The new Americans division shall, as deemed necessary and appropriate by the department, work with other divisions within the department, the economic development department, the higher education department, the public education department, the department of health, the health care authority, the homeland security and emergency management department, the department of public safety or the regulation and licensing department to fulfill the duties of the new Americans division. C. By August 1, 2027, and by July 1 of each year thereafter, the new Americans division shall provide a report to an interim committee that studies economic and rural development and policy, the secretary, the governor and members of the legislature on the activities of the division in the preceding twelve months, including an analysis of the economic impact, status, population and workforce numbers of new Americans in the state."
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New Mexico officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Mexico statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.