New Mexico · individual fact

New Mexico prices and inflation

Compare New Mexico’s price levels, category costs, and changes in its regional price deflator.

BLS does not publish a statewide New Mexico CPI or a complete 50-state CPI cohort. The statewide comparisons here use BEA regional price parities and its implicit regional price deflator. They are explicitly labeled and are not CPI.

All-items price level92.22024 · #36 of 50 · highest first
Goods price level96.12024 · #34 of 50 · highest first
Housing-rent price level73.62024 · #36 of 50 · highest first

New Mexico over time

Explore New Mexico readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Mexico officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Mexico effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Mexico change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

All-items price level New Mexico · source units
New MexicoPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

All-items price level2024: 92.288.594.9101.2New Mexico, 2014: 95.5New Mexico, 2015: 95.4New Mexico, 2016: 94.5New Mexico, 2017: 95.7New Mexico, 2018: 91.7New Mexico, 2019: 93New Mexico, 2020: 91.8New Mexico, 2021: 89.7New Mexico, 2022: 90.9New Mexico, 2023: 91New Mexico, 2024: 92.2201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 27National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupt fuel supplies · 2005-08-29Katrina / RitaNational context · Global food and energy price surge · 2008-07-15Food / energy surgeNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Fed cuts rates near zero during the crisis · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Renewed global food and oil price pressures · 2011-04-11Commodity pressuresNational context · U.S. drought damages crops and raises food costs · 2012-08-10U.S. droughtNational context · Oil-price collapse lowers energy inflation · 2014-11-27Oil-price collapseNational context · Fed raises rates after the near-zero period · 2015-12-16Fed rate liftoffNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt fuel markets · 2017-08-25Harvey / IrmaNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · Fed cuts rates amid muted inflation · 2019-07-31Fed cuts rates in 2019National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Fed emergency rate cut and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency easingNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands pandemic support · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening demand meets supply and chip shortages · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Avian influenza disrupts egg supplies · 2022-02-09Bird flu / egg supplyNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Banking stress raises credit and inflation uncertainty · 2023-03-22Banking stressNational context · Supply recovery and slower rent growth ease inflation pressures · 2023-08-25Supply / rent easingNational context · Red Sea shipping disruption raises supply risks · 2024-02-22Red Sea shippingNational context · Federal Reserve cuts rates in September 2024 · 2024-09-18Fed rate cutNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts CPI collection · 2025-10-01Shutdown / CPI data gapNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz energy disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz shock● New Mexico Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · New Mexico delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ New Mexico agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-02-28

3 of 3 reviewed New Mexico actions match · 3 date markers shown. 27 major events shown separately.

New Mexico · 2024: 92.2 · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year. Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare New Mexico with the published U.S. category value shown. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New Mexico All-items price level · source units
PeriodNew MexicoRankU.S. benchmark
202492.2#36 of 50100
202391#38 of 50100
202290.9#37 of 50100
202189.7#46 of 50100
202091.8#36 of 50100
201993#33 of 50100
201891.7#40 of 50100
201795.7#27 of 50100
201694.5#28 of 50100
201595.4#27 of 50100
201495.5#27 of 50100
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New Mexico · state comparison

How does New Mexico’s cost of living compare?

The U.S. all-items level is 100. Each category uses its own published U.S. benchmark. Compare the same category and year.

New Mexico · 202492.2
New Mexico rank#36among all 50 states
U.S. price level100Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

All-items price level

BEA regional price parity, relative to the overall national price level. The U.S. all-items index equals 100 each year.

Measures prices across places within the same year, rather than annual inflation. For all items, 103 means about 3% above the national level. Category benchmarks can differ from 100; compare New Mexico with the published U.S. category value shown.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
All-items price level history in New Mexico88.294.9101.520142024
2024 · New Mexico: 92.2 · Rank #36 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 100 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico All-items price level history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
201495.5
201595.4
201694.5
201795.7
201891.7
201993
202091.8
202189.7
202290.9
202391
202492.2

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 86.9Higher value · 110.7Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 92.22024 · Rank #36 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
All-items price level · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California110.7—
#2Hawaii110—
#3New Jersey108.8—
#4New York107.9—
#5Washington107—
#6Massachusetts105.8—
#7Maryland105—
#8New Hampshire104.2—
#9Connecticut103.6—
#10Florida103.4—
#11Oregon103.4—
#12Colorado103.1—
#13Alaska102.4—
#14Rhode Island102.3—
#15Virginia101.1—
#16Arizona100.7—
#17Nevada100—
#18Illinois100—
#19Delaware99.8—
#20Utah98.9—
#21Minnesota98.6—
#22Vermont98—
#23Pennsylvania97.6—
#24Texas97.1—
#25Maine97.1—
#26Georgia96.3—
#27Michigan96.2—
#28Idaho95.5—
#29Montana94.6—
#30North Carolina94.3—
#31Wisconsin94.1—
#32South Carolina93.7—
#33Indiana93.3—
#34Ohio92.8—
#35Wyoming92.7—
#36New Mexico · your comparison92.2—
#37Tennessee91.9—
#38Missouri90.8—
#39Kentucky90.2—
#40Nebraska90.1—
#41Kansas90.1—
#42West Virginia89.5—
#43North Dakota89—
#44Alabama88.8—
#45South Dakota88.6—
#46Louisiana88.2—
#47Oklahoma87.8—
#48Iowa87.8—
#49Mississippi87—
#50Arkansas86.9—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

How much have prices changed?

This is BEA’s implicit regional price deflator, derived from regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

New Mexico · 20244%
New Mexico rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual change in regional price deflator

Year-over-year change in the BEA implicit regional price deflator.

An annual regional inflation measure; different from BLS CPI-U. Changes can reflect regional price parity estimates and revisions as well as national inflation.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Annual change in regional price deflator history in New Mexico-3.8%2.8%9.5%20152024
2024 · New Mexico: 4% · Rank #6 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.6% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Annual change in regional price deflator history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
20150.1%
20160%
20173.1%
2018-2.3%
20192.9%
2020-0.1%
20211.8%
20228%
20233.9%
20244%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.8%Higher value · 6.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · 4%2024 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Annual change in regional price deflator · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Montana6.7%—
#2Idaho6.2%—
#3Utah6%—
#4Nevada4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Mexico · your comparison4%—
#7Indiana4%—
#8Wyoming3.9%—
#9Illinois3.9%—
#10Colorado3.8%—
#11Delaware3.7%—
#12Ohio3.6%—
#13Wisconsin3.6%—
#14North Dakota3.5%—
#15Vermont3.5%—
#16South Dakota3.1%—
#17Maryland3%—
#18Minnesota3%—
#19Kentucky2.9%—
#20South Carolina2.9%—
#21Hawaii2.9%—
#22Rhode Island2.8%—
#23Mississippi2.8%—
#24Kansas2.8%—
#25Pennsylvania2.8%—
#26Arkansas2.8%—
#27New York2.7%—
#28Arizona2.6%—
#29North Carolina2.5%—
#30Texas2.5%—
#31New Jersey2.5%—
#32West Virginia2.5%—
#33Nebraska2.4%—
#34Georgia2.4%—
#35Florida2.4%—
#36Virginia2.4%—
#37Tennessee2.4%—
#38Alabama2.3%—
#39Missouri2.3%—
#40Louisiana2%—
#41Connecticut2%—
#42Alaska1.7%—
#43Maine1.7%—
#44Oklahoma1.6%—
#45Iowa1.5%—
#46New Hampshire1.4%—
#47Washington1.3%—
#48California1.3%—
#49Oregon1.2%—
#50Massachusetts0.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Mexico · state comparison

Are incomes keeping up with prices?

Real personal income accounts for national inflation and regional price differences.

New Mexico · 2024$51,121
New Mexico rank#48among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

Regional price-adjusted and inflation-adjusted personal income per resident.

Constant 2017 dollars. This differs from household wages, disposable income, and the national real-hourly-earnings measure.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Mexico
Real personal income per person history in New Mexico$36.89K$49.6K$62.3K20142024
2024 · New Mexico: $51,121 · Rank #48 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Mexico Real personal income per person history
PeriodNew MexicoCompare
2014$39,825
2015$40,741
2016$41,530
2017$41,044
2018$43,899
2019$45,000
2020$48,584
2021$52,110
2022$50,375
2023$50,620
2024$51,121

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Mexico stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Mexico has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Mexico · $51,1212024 · Rank #48 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Mexico with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico · your comparison$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living from FactVote’s New Mexico candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

4 statements from 3 candidates

2026 New Mexico Governor and Lieutenant Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Deb Haaland

1 statement

Democratic · Governor · NM

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

Invest in more renewable energy to create jobs, lower energy costs, and make New Mexico the energy capital of the country.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public lands, energy, water, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Invest in more renewable energy to create jobs, lower energy costs, and make New Mexico the energy capital of the country.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Deb Haaland — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 New Mexico U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Gabe Vasquez

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · NM

Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

New Mexico’s workers and small businesses are the backbone of our economy, and Gabe will always put them first. For too long the nation’s largest corporations haven’t paid their fair share, while CEOs and wealthy investors inflate their salaries and dividends. They do this while refusing to increase…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

New Mexico’s workers and small businesses are the backbone of our economy, and Gabe will always put them first. For too long the nation’s largest corporations haven’t paid their fair share, while CEOs and wealthy investors inflate their salaries and dividends. They do this while refusing to increase pay or benefits for workers. We can’t afford to allow this to continue. Gabe will work every day to help our workers and small businesses thrive and ensure that corporations are paying their fair share. This starts with raising wages, supporting workers’ right to organize and join a union, supporting the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, increasing support for our small businesses, and repealing the Trump tax cuts that paid for tax cuts for the rich by cutting health care and food assistance for working families. Gabe also understands that New Mexicans are struggling to pay their bills because of rising prices, and that’s why he’ll support policies that cut taxes on working families while lowering the cost of healthcare, childcare, and utilities.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Gabe Vasquez — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 New Mexico U.S. House — District 3 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 3 · NM

CPI / inflation mention

We must also lower the cost of health care. I strongly support fully funding and strengthening Medicare, Medicaid, and our nation’s network of community health centers to make sure everyone can access care. I proudly voted for the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which President Biden signed into law …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Government-published candidate material

We must also lower the cost of health care. I strongly support fully funding and strengthening Medicare, Medicaid, and our nation’s network of community health centers to make sure everyone can access care. I proudly voted for the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which President Biden signed into law on August 16, 2022. This landmark law lowers health care premiums and allows Medicare to negotiate drug prices and cap out-of-pocket costs at $2,000.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teresa Leger Fernández — official government primary source 9 ↗
View 1 more statement from Teresa Leger Fernández
Consumer prices & cost-of-living context

As housing costs soar, too many New Mexicans struggle to pay rent or achieve their dreams of homeownership. I believe all of our neighbors deserve to afford to live in the communities they grew up in. That’s why I introduced my Home of Your Own Act, which would create a new homeownership assistance …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Government-published candidate material

As housing costs soar, too many New Mexicans struggle to pay rent or achieve their dreams of homeownership. I believe all of our neighbors deserve to afford to live in the communities they grew up in. That’s why I introduced my Home of Your Own Act, which would create a new homeownership assistance program that would provide one-time, $30,000 grants to eligible first-time homebuyers nationwide. I also cosponsored the Neighborhood Homes Investment Act and the Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act to increase the supply of housing and bring down costs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Teresa Leger Fernández — official government primary source 5 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific inflation, consumer prices and the cost of living terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Mexico candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New Mexico incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Mexico legislators and New Mexico’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Mexico’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 New Mexico incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Kristina Ortez

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 42 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Kristina Ortez
New Mexico Legislature · HB 41

CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUEL STANDARDS

Mar 5, 2024 · Enacted · Chapter 54

Kristina Ortez · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed section 4 of HB 41 directs a clean transportation fuel program with rules due by July 1, 2026. It sets lifecycle carbon-intensity targets of at least 20% below 2018 levels by 2030 and 30% by 2040, with tradable credits, cost-containment mechanisms, stakeholder review and possible emergency or forecast-based deferral. These are statutory program requirements, not proof that rules were adopted, targets achieved or gasoline prices changed. The connection is to the gasoline component of transportation fuels.

Signed by Governor on 2024-03-05, Chapter 54 of the 2024 Regular Session. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and present enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s six-state Gulf Coast regular-gasoline series, including New Mexico, rather than a New Mexico statewide measurement. Gasoline taxes and the gasoline component of transportation-fuel standards concern parts of fuel costs and supply. Special fuels, aviation fuel and electricity generation are distinct. A policy connection does not establish a regional pump-price effect. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 4. A new section of the Environmental Improvement Act is enacted to read: "CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUEL STANDARD PROGRAM--RULES.-- A. The board shall promulgate rules to implement a clean transportation fuel standard program no later than July 1, 2026. B. Prior to the board promulgating rules pursuant to this section, the secretary shall convene an advisory committee composed of stakeholders from in-state and out-of- state producers of transportation fuels, transportation fuel distributors, local governments, utilities, tribal governments, environmental protection groups, environmental justice groups and other individuals or entities with relevant expertise to provide input and periodically review program rules. C. The clean transportation fuel standard program rules shall: (1) establish a statewide technology-neutral clean transportation fuel standard based on a schedule for annually decreasing the carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in the state; (2) apply the clean transportation fuel standard to account for the fuel lifecycle in order to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels used in the state by at least twenty percent below 2018 carbon intensity levels by 2030 and at least thirty percent below 2018 carbon intensity levels by 2040; (3) establish technology-neutral mechanisms for generating, obtaining, trading, selling and retiring credits among transportation fuel producers, fuel distributors and other individuals or entities in the transportation fuel market, including additional credit opportunities from activities and projects that support the reduction or removal of greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation in the state; (4) establish mechanisms, including cost- containment measures and credit holding limits, to allow credits to be banked for future compliance periods to stabilize and incentivize investment in the transportation fuel credit market, verify the validity of compliance obligations, maximize savings and limit consumer costs, ensure program compliance, trade credits and allow for market participation by persons who register in the market to facilitate credit generation; (5) require a utility that elects to participate in the program to invest all revenues from the sale of credits, not including administrative program costs, into distribution, grid modernization, infrastructure and other projects that support transportation decarbonization, with at least fifty percent of such revenues supporting low- income and underserved communities and with investor-owned utilities receiving regulatory treatment consistent with Section 62-8-12 NMSA 1978; (6) consider similar programs in other jurisdictions, allow for coordination with other jurisdictions to promote regional reductions or removal of greenhouse gas emissions and allow market participants to generate credits under any overlapping current and future federal transportation fuel regulations; (7) not discriminate against fuels solely on the basis of having originated in another state or jurisdiction; (8) establish a periodic review process that includes input from the advisory committee convened pursuant to Subsection B of this section to provide input on program rules and performance and determine potential adjustments if deemed necessary after review, including the superseding of the state program by federal legislation; (9) allow for a deferral of the program based on emergency or forecasted conditions; and (10) establish fees for the cost of the department's administration and enforcement of the program; provided that any fees are deposited in the state air quality permit fund. D. As used in this section: (1) "low-income" means annual household adjusted gross income, as defined in the Income Tax Act, of equal to or less than two hundred percent of the federal poverty level; and (2) "underserved community" means an area in this state, including a county, municipality or neighborhood, or subset of such area where the median income of the area is low-income."
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Patricia Roybal Caballero

New Mexico House of Representatives, District 13 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Patricia Roybal Caballero
New Mexico Legislature · HB 246

INCREASE MINIMUM WAGE

Feb 14, 2025 · Action postponed indefinitely

Patricia Roybal Caballero · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed introduced section 2 of HB 246 proposed a $17 hourly minimum wage beginning January 1, 2026, followed by annual adjustments from 2027 using the January 2026 wage multiplied by the ratio of the prior September’s CPI to September 2025 CPI, with no downward adjustment. It would replace the prior wage and tipped-wage schedules in that section, as well as the stated agricultural food, utilities, supplies and housing deduction. Employer notice of the next year’s rate would be due each November 1 beginning in 2026. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely; the proposed $17 rate is not presented as enacted or as measured household-income growth.

The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

Census household money income is measured before taxes and includes wages and specified cash benefits. Minimum-wage provisions concern earnings; tax credits and in-kind benefits are not themselves increases in this statistic. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 2. Section 50-4-22 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1955, Chapter 200, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read: "50-4-22. MINIMUM WAGES.-- A. On and after January 1, 2026, an employer shall pay to an employee a minimum wage rate of seventeen dollars ($17.00) an hour adjusted annually pursuant to the provisions of Subsection C of this section. B. An employee shall not be required to work more than forty hours in any week of seven days, unless the employee is paid one and one-half times the employee's regular hourly rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours. For an employee who is paid a fixed salary for fluctuating hours and who is employed by an employer a majority of whose business in New Mexico consists of providing investigative services to the federal government, the hourly rate may be calculated in accordance with the provisions of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and the regulations pursuant to that act; provided that in no case shall the hourly rate be less than the federal minimum wage. C. On January 1, 2027 and on January 1 of each successive year, the minimum wage rate shall be adjusted by multiplying the minimum wage as of January 1, 2026 by a fraction, the numerator of which is the consumer price index ending in September of the previous year and the denominator of which is the consumer price index ending September 2025; provided that the minimum wage rate shall not be adjusted downward as a result of a decrease in the consumer price index. By November 1, 2026 and by November 1 of each successive year, the workforce solutions department shall post on its website and otherwise notify employers of the minimum wage for the next year."
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales

New Mexico Senate, District 6 · D–NM

1 proposal
View proposals from Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales
New Mexico Legislature · SB 76

EXPAND GAS & SPECIAL FUELS TAXES

Feb 17, 2026 · Action postponed indefinitely

Roberto "Bobby" J. Gonzales · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

As introduced, SB 76 proposed a gasoline excise tax of 23 cents per gallon received in New Mexico, replacing 17 cents. The special-fuel provisions are outside this fact-specific excerpt. The bill was action-postponed indefinitely; the proposed rate is not presented as the current tax or as a measured change in the regional pump price.

The official history records Action Postponed Indefinitely (API). The displayed date is the latest dated legislative action, not an independently dated postponement. This relationship reviews the introduced version; later substitutes and amendments are outside its selected excerpt. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s six-state Gulf Coast regular-gasoline series, including New Mexico, rather than a New Mexico statewide measurement. Gasoline taxes and the gasoline component of transportation-fuel standards concern parts of fuel costs and supply. Special fuels, aviation fuel and electricity generation are distinct. A policy connection does not establish a regional pump-price effect. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained New Mexico evidence context: Gulf Coast regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SECTION 1. Section 7-13-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1971, Chapter 207, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read: "7-13-3. IMPOSITION AND RATE OF TAX--DENOMINATION AS "GASOLINE TAX".-- A. For the privilege of receiving gasoline in this state, there is imposed an excise tax at a rate provided in Subsection B of this section on each gallon of gasoline received in New Mexico. B. The tax imposed by Subsection A of this section shall be twenty-three cents ($.23) per gallon received in New Mexico. C. The tax imposed by this section may be called the "gasoline tax"."
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New Mexico officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Mexico statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.