New Hampshire · individual fact

New Hampshire health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages4.5%2024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 655.5%2024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6581.4%2024 · #3 of 50 · highest first

New Hampshire over time

Explore New Hampshire readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Hampshire officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Hampshire effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Hampshire change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages New Hampshire · source units
New HampshirePublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 4.5%3.5%6.9%10.2%New Hampshire, 2014: 9.2%New Hampshire, 2015: 6.3%New Hampshire, 2016: 5.9%New Hampshire, 2017: 5.8%New Hampshire, 2018: 5.7%New Hampshire, 2019: 6.3%New Hampshire, 2021: 5.1%New Hampshire, 2022: 4.9%New Hampshire, 2023: 4.7%New Hampshire, 2024: 4.5%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 21National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● New Hampshire Legislature · 3● U.S. Congress · New Hampshire delegation · 2◆ Governor · 3■ New Hampshire agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2010-03-012026-07-31

8 of 8 reviewed New Hampshire actions match · 8 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.

New Hampshire · 2024: 4.5% · Rank #47 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
New Hampshire Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodNew HampshireRankU.S. benchmark
20244.5%#47 of 508.2%
20234.7%#43 of 50Not available
20224.9%#42 of 50Not available
20215.1%#43 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20196.3%#38 of 50Not available
20185.7%#37 of 50Not available
20175.8%#37 of 50Not available
20165.9%#36 of 50Not available
20156.3%#38 of 50Not available
20149.2%#32 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

New Hampshire · 20244.5%
New Hampshire rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Hampshire
Uninsured rate · all ages history in New Hampshire3.8%6.9%9.9%20142024
2024 · New Hampshire: 4.5% · Rank #47 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Hampshire Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodNew HampshireCompare
20149.2%
20156.3%
20165.9%
20175.8%
20185.7%
20196.3%
2020Not available
20215.1%
20224.9%
20234.7%
20244.5%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 4.5%2024 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire · your comparison4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

5.5%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of New Hampshire’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.

  • This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
  • Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
New Hampshire · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare New Hampshire with every state.

New Hampshire · 2020$11,793
New Hampshire rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Hampshire
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in New Hampshire$7.36K$9.87K$12.37K20142020
2020 · New Hampshire: $11,793 · Rank #11 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Hampshire Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodNew HampshireCompare
2014$9,367
2015$9,763
2016$10,157
2017$10,573
2018$10,974
2019$11,310
2020$11,793

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · $11,7932020 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire · your comparison$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

New Hampshire · 202278.7 years
New Hampshire rank#10among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total New Hampshire population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Hampshire
Life expectancy at birth history in New Hampshire77.2 years78.5 years79.7 years20182022
2022 · New Hampshire: 78.7 years · Rank #10 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Hampshire Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodNew HampshireCompare
201879.1 years
201979.4 years
202079 years
202178.5 years
202278.7 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 78.7 years2022 · Rank #10 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire · your comparison78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

New Hampshire · 20237.9%
New Hampshire rank#46among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

New Hampshire
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in New Hampshire6.8%9.1%11.3%20192023
2023 · New Hampshire: 7.9% · Rank #46 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
New Hampshire Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodNew HampshireCompare
20198.1%
20207.5%
20217.3%
20228.2%
20237.9%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 7.9%2023 · Rank #46 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 7.1% – 8.8%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire · your comparison7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

New Hampshire · June 30, 202674.8%
New Hampshire rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 74.8%June 30, 2026 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire · your comparison74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

New Hampshire · 2020$7,991
New Hampshire rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · $7,9912020 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire · your comparison$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

New Hampshire · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

New Hampshire · 2023–202427.7%
New Hampshire rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

New Hampshire · 27.7%2023–2024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire · your comparison27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s New Hampshire candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

21 statements from 9 candidates

2026 New Hampshire Governor General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements

Kelly Ayotte

2 statements

Republican · Governor · NH

Care & public health

Secured a federal funding award to expand access to affordable health care across New Hampshire.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health Access Record

Candidate campaign source

Secured a federal funding award to expand access to affordable health care across New Hampshire.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kelly Ayotte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Kelly Ayotte
Care & public health

Hold insurance carriers accountable when they deny covered mental-health care for children.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Children's Mental Health

Candidate campaign source

Hold insurance carriers accountable when they deny covered mental-health care for children.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Kelly Ayotte — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Stephen Villee

1 statement

Libertarian · Governor · NH

Care & public health

A bill to begin the process might specify that people moving into New Hampshire after a certain date would have no positive rights. They'd be required to sign a waiver acknowledging that the government won't provide them with food, housing, health care, or education for their children. But those alr…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Issues

Candidate campaign source

A bill to begin the process might specify that people moving into New Hampshire after a certain date would have no positive rights. They'd be required to sign a waiver acknowledging that the government won't provide them with food, housing, health care, or education for their children. But those already here who aren't libertarian would be grandfathered into the benefits they have now. The goal is to avoid a sudden drastic reduction in quality of life for anyone.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Stephen Villee — validated position source ↗

2026 New Hampshire U.S. House - District 1 General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 4 statements

Stefany Shaheen

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · NH

Health coverage

Pass legislation introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders to expand Medicare to cover dental, vision, and hearing – essential care that two thirds of seniors need.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Pass legislation introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders to expand Medicare to cover dental, vision, and hearing – essential care that two thirds of seniors need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Stefany Shaheen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Stefany Shaheen
Health coverage

Getting people the care they need and can afford is my bottom line. I’m with Bernie Sanders and support Medicare for All. We need a public option in this country, which means keeping every option to on the table to deliver necessary change. We have to fundamentally rebuild. Insurance companies shoul…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Getting people the care they need and can afford is my bottom line. I’m with Bernie Sanders and support Medicare for All. We need a public option in this country, which means keeping every option to on the table to deliver necessary change. We have to fundamentally rebuild. Insurance companies should never dictate the care people receive.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Stefany Shaheen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Health coverage

Prevent AI from making decisions that should be made by doctors. The Trump Administration is getting ready to launch a program that would allow AI to deny coverage and care to people on Medicare – that would affect more than 350,000 Granite Staters. Doctors and nurses should be making decisions abou…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Prevent AI from making decisions that should be made by doctors. The Trump Administration is getting ready to launch a program that would allow AI to deny coverage and care to people on Medicare – that would affect more than 350,000 Granite Staters. Doctors and nurses should be making decisions about health care, not computer algorithms.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Stefany Shaheen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Break up the corporate monopolies taking over the entire health care system, buying up hospitals, primary care practices, pharmacies, everything, and taking a cut at every stop, raising costs for all of us. I’ll fight to stop big Wall Street banks and investment firms building these monopolies and g…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Break up the corporate monopolies taking over the entire health care system, buying up hospitals, primary care practices, pharmacies, everything, and taking a cut at every stop, raising costs for all of us. I’ll fight to stop big Wall Street banks and investment firms building these monopolies and getting richer by raising costs for everyone.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Stefany Shaheen — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 New Hampshire U.S. House - District 2 General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 7 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 2 · NH

Health coverage

Social Security and Medicare are programs our seniors have paid into their whole working lives. Seniors can count on me to fight for them and protect those earned benefits. We must strengthen the protections of these benefits by severely limiting Federal Government borrowing from the Social Security…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Social Security and Medicare

Candidate campaign source

Social Security and Medicare are programs our seniors have paid into their whole working lives. Seniors can count on me to fight for them and protect those earned benefits. We must strengthen the protections of these benefits by severely limiting Federal Government borrowing from the Social Security Trust Fund. Social Security is not a political slush fund; this is money the Federal Government should not play with.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Lily Tang Williams — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Maggie Goodlander

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · NH

Health coverage

Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription drugs, and making childcare, elder care, and housing more affordable. It means building a tax system that works for hardworking Granite Staters by delivering tax breaks for working families – not handouts to billionaires and big corporations. It means protecting the rights of workers, including to collectively bargain, and raising the minimum wage. It also means legalizing marijuana at the federal level and delivering meaningful and much-needed criminal justice reforms.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Maggie Goodlander — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Maggie Goodlander
Care & public health

No one believes more deeply in freedom than we do here in the Live Free or Die Granite State. In Congress, Maggie will fight to restore, defend, and expand our basic freedoms – from the freedom to access the reproductive healthcare you need to the freedom to live as your authentic self. Because of h…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Reproductive health and civil rights

Candidate campaign source

No one believes more deeply in freedom than we do here in the Live Free or Die Granite State. In Congress, Maggie will fight to restore, defend, and expand our basic freedoms – from the freedom to access the reproductive healthcare you need to the freedom to live as your authentic self. Because of her experience over the past 15 years, Maggie knows how to fight these fights and deliver for New Hampshire. She clerked on the U.S. Supreme Court; she has worked in both houses of the U.S. Congress; and she served as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Maggie Goodlander — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

Maggie believes that healthcare is a right, not a privilege, and that mental healthcare is healthcare. Period. In Congress, Maggie will fight to make healthcare more affordable and accessible for all Americans, including by taking on big health insurers and Big Pharma.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Maggie believes that healthcare is a right, not a privilege, and that mental healthcare is healthcare. Period. In Congress, Maggie will fight to make healthcare more affordable and accessible for all Americans, including by taking on big health insurers and Big Pharma.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Maggie Goodlander — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Care & public health

The day Roe v. Wade was overturned, Maggie was working at the Justice Department and helped launch its Reproductive Rights Task Force to ensure patients and providers across America had access to the legal assistance they needed in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. Like so many…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Abortion, contraception, and IVF

Candidate campaign source

The day Roe v. Wade was overturned, Maggie was working at the Justice Department and helped launch its Reproductive Rights Task Force to ensure patients and providers across America had access to the legal assistance they needed in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. Like so many across New Hampshire and our nation, the fight for reproductive freedom is deeply personal for Maggie. Last year, she was almost 20 weeks pregnant when she and her husband Jake lost their son and struggled to access the healthcare they needed because of delays caused by the Dobbs decision. In Congress, Maggie will fight like hell to defend access to the full range of reproductive healthcare, including abortion, contraceptives, and IVF. You can read about Maggie’s reproductive freedom agenda here.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Maggie Goodlander — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Robbie Mahrou

2 statements

Independent · U.S. House District 2 · NH

Care & public health

Support the Sustaining Rural Healthcare Act (H.R. 7727) to preserve Critical Access designations

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Support the Sustaining Rural Healthcare Act (H.R. 7727) to preserve Critical Access designations

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Robbie Mahrou — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 1 more statement from Robbie Mahrou
Care & public health

Stop rural hospitals from closing and reduce harmful federal mandates on small facilities. NH hospital operating costs rose 44% between 2019 and 2024.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis

Candidate campaign source

Stop rural hospitals from closing and reduce harmful federal mandates on small facilities. NH hospital operating costs rose 44% between 2019 and 2024.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Robbie Mahrou — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Hampshire candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

New Hampshire incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Hampshire legislators and New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Hampshire’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

27 matching sponsorships or proposals · 22 New Hampshire incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 17 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365

(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.

Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325

Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.

Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Donald S McFarlane

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Grafton 18 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Donald S McFarlane
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365

(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.

Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325

Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.

Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Erica J Layon

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 13 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Erica J Layon
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365

(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.

Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325

Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.

Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Henry R Giasson

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Hillsborough 29 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Henry R Giasson
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365

(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.

Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325

Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.

Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. James R Thibault

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Merrimack 25 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. James R Thibault
New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365

(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.

Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325

Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.

Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Jason M. Osborne

New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 2 · R–NH

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Jason M. Osborne
New Hampshire Legislature · SB 134

relative to work requirements under the state Medicaid program.

Mar 27, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 18

Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Timothy Lang · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Sen. Bill M. Gannon · Sponsored / Rep. Jason M. Osborne · Sponsored / Rep. Michael I Moffett · Sponsored / Rep. Jess Edwards · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 134 requires applicable Granite Advantage Medicaid applicants to document compliance with federal community-engagement requirements for the month immediately before the application month. It rejects self-attestation and requires at least quarterly checks between redeterminations. People who fail to comply receive notice and 30 additional days to document compliance or an exemption before required disenrollment. Exemptions require verification; medical-frailty or special-needs exemptions require the specified professional certification and cannot exceed the stated federal definition. Optional exemptions and other program waivers require express oversight-committee approval. Federal requirements control conflicts. The law took effect March 27, 2026 and directs implementation documentation by December 1, 2026, or an earlier date within 30 days after publication of the federal application template, after fiscal-committee review. It suspends the prior state community-engagement provisions for the duration of the federal requirements. Enactment does not establish actual disenrollments or a change in the uninsured rate.

Chapter 18, approved 2026-03-27. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts residents under 65 without insurance. Medicaid eligibility requirements and marketplace premium assistance concern obtaining or retaining coverage; neither establishes the number enrolled or a change in the uninsured share. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained New Hampshire evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

18:1 New Sections; New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program; Work Requirements. Amend RSA 126-AA by inserting after section 5 the following new sections: 126-AA:6 Work Requirements. I. In this section: (a) “Applicable individual” means an individual described in 42 U.S.C. section 1396a(xx)(9)(A) who is eligible for the granite advantage health care program, and who is subject to work requirements. (b) “Work requirements” mean the Medicaid community engagement and work requirements established under Section 71119 of Public Law No. 119-21. II. No applicable individual shall be enrolled in Medicaid unless, at the time of application, the individual demonstrates compliance with the work requirements for the one month immediately preceding the month during which the individual applies. The department of health and human services shall require documentary evidence and shall not accept self-attestation at the time of application. III. The department of health and human services shall verify an applicable individual’s compliance with documentary evidence. Verification shall occur on an ongoing basis, at least quarterly between redetermination periods. Self-attestation shall not be accepted. IV. The department of health and human services may rely on ex parte records and or documentary evidence provided by the applicable individual to verify exemption from work requirements. The department of health and human services shall verify all exemptions and shall not accept self-attestation from individuals seeking exemptions. V. The department of health and human services shall not seek or implement any additional optional exemptions under 42 U.S.C. section 1396a(xx)(3)(B) or other program waivers without obtaining express approval of the oversight committee on health and human services established in RSA 126-A:13. VI. The department of health and human services shall only approve an exemption for an individual based on the status of medically frailty or otherwise an individual with special needs if the individual has been medically certified per a statement from a physician, physician associate, nurse, nurse practitioner, designated representative of the physician’s office, a licensed or certified psychologist, or a social worker, as having disabling mental disorders, having a physical, intellectual, or developmental disability that significantly impairs their ability to perform activities of daily living, including eating, dressing, bathing, grooming, getting in and out of bed and chairs, walking, going outdoors, using the toilet, or is in treatment for a chronic substance use disorder. In no case may the department of health and human services expand the definition of an individual who is medically frail or otherwise an individual with special needs beyond the scope of the definition established under 42 C.F.R. section 440.315 unless as otherwise modified in Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025). VII. Any applicable individual who fails to comply with the work requirements shall be provided notice and an additional 30 days to supply verification of compliance or exemption. After the 30-day notice period, the department of health and human services shall disenroll any applicable individual who does not demonstrate compliance with the work requirements or qualify for an exemption. VIII. In the event of a conflict between this section and the requirements of Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), the requirements of the federal statute or regulation shall control. 126-AA:7 Severability. If any portion of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable. 18:2 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program; Community Engagement and Work Requirements. Amend 2025, 141:412 to read as follows: 141:412 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program, [] Community Engagement and Work Requirements. I. On or before [] December 1, 2026, or on an earlier date within 30 calendar days after publication of the federal application template, the department of health and human services shall [] submit to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) [] required documentation relative to implementing community engagement and work requirements as a condition of Granite Advantage eligibility in accordance with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025). Prior to submitting the [] required documentation to CMS, the department shall submit the proposed [] plan to implement community engagement and work requirements to the fiscal committee of the general court for [] review. II. Beginning November 1, 2025 and [] quarterly thereafter through December 31, 2026, and then annually thereafter, the department shall provide a report regarding the status of the [] plan under review by CMS and implementation of the community engagement and work requirements [] eligibility in accordance with Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), to the senate president, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate clerk, the house clerk, and the governor. 18:3 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program Established; Community Engagement and Work Requirements; Suspended. The provisions of RSA 126-AA:2, directly related to the community engagement and work requirements, shall be suspended for the duration of the federal community engagement and work requirements under Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), as amended. If the federal community engagement and work requirements are subsequently eliminated, the commissioner of the department of health and human services shall immediately certify in writing the removal of the suspension to the director of the office of legislative services, the secretary of state, the senate president, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate clerk, the house clerk, and the governor. 18:4 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program Established. Amend RSA 126-AA:2, I(a) to read as follows: I.(a) The commissioner shall apply for any necessary waivers and state plan amendments to implement [] and administer the New Hampshire granite advantage health care program which shall be funded exclusively from non-general fund sources, including federal funds. The commissioner shall include in an application for the necessary waivers submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) a waiver of the requirement to provide 90-day retroactive coverage and a state plan amendment allowing state and county correctional facilities to conduct presumptive eligibility determinations for incarcerated inmates to the extent provided under federal law. To receive coverage under the program, those individuals in the new adult group who are eligible for benefits shall choose coverage offered by one of the managed care organizations (MCOs) awarded contracts as vendors under Medicaid managed care, pursuant to RSA 126-A:5, XIX(a). The program shall make coverage available in a cost-effective manner and shall provide cost transparency measures, and ensure that patients are utilizing the most appropriate level of care. Cost effectiveness shall be achieved by offering cash incentives and other forms of incentives to the insured by choosing preferred lower cost medical providers. Loss of incentives shall also be employed. MCOs shall employ reference-based pricing, cost transparency, and the use of incentives and loss of incentives to the Medicaid and newly eligible population. For the purposes of this subparagraph, "reference-based pricing" means setting a maximum amount payable for certain medical procedures. 18:5 Effective Date. This act shall take effect upon its passage.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current New Hampshire officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Hampshire statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.