Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.
Uninsured rate · all ages4.5%2024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 655.5%2024 · #47 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6581.4%2024 · #3 of 50 · highest first
New Hampshire over time
Explore New Hampshire readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. New Hampshire officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a New Hampshire effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a New Hampshire change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Uninsured rate · all ages New Hampshire · source units
New HampshirePublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
8 of 8 reviewed New Hampshire actions match · 8 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.
New Hampshire · 2024: 4.5% · Rank #47 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
New Hampshire Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
New Hampshire · state comparison
Who has health coverage?
Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.
New Hampshire · 20244.5%
New Hampshire rank#47among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Uninsured rate · all ages
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.
ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Hampshire
2024 · New Hampshire: 4.5% · Rank #47 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Hampshire Uninsured rate · all ages history
Period
New Hampshire
Compare
2014
9.2%
2015
6.3%
2016
5.9%
2017
5.8%
2018
5.7%
2019
6.3%
2020
Not available
2021
5.1%
2022
4.9%
2023
4.7%
2024
4.5%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Hampshire · 4.5%2024 · Rank #47 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
16.7%
—
#2
Georgia
12%
—
#3
Oklahoma
11.5%
—
#4
Nevada
11.4%
—
#5
Alaska
11%
—
#6
Florida
10.9%
—
#7
Arizona
10.3%
—
#7
Wyoming
10.3%
—
#9
New Mexico
10.1%
—
#10
Mississippi
9.7%
—
#10
Tennessee
9.7%
—
#12
Arkansas
9.4%
—
#13
Idaho
9.2%
—
#14
South Carolina
9%
—
#15
Montana
8.8%
—
#16
North Carolina
8.6%
—
#17
Kansas
8.5%
—
#18
Utah
8.3%
—
#19
Alabama
8.2%
—
#20
South Dakota
8.1%
—
#21
Colorado
7.9%
—
#22
Louisiana
7.7%
—
#22
Missouri
7.7%
—
#22
New Jersey
7.7%
—
#25
Indiana
7.5%
—
#26
Nebraska
7.1%
—
#27
Delaware
6.9%
—
#27
Illinois
6.9%
—
#27
Virginia
6.9%
—
#30
Kentucky
6.8%
—
#31
Ohio
6.7%
—
#32
Washington
6.5%
—
#33
Maryland
6.3%
—
#34
North Dakota
6.1%
—
#35
California
5.9%
—
#36
Connecticut
5.8%
—
#36
Pennsylvania
5.8%
—
#36
West Virginia
5.8%
—
#39
Maine
5.5%
—
#40
Iowa
5.4%
—
#41
Wisconsin
5.3%
—
#42
Oregon
5.2%
—
#43
Michigan
5.1%
—
#43
Minnesota
5.1%
—
#45
New York
5%
—
#46
Rhode Island
4.6%
—
#47
New Hampshire · your comparison
4.5%
—
#48
Vermont
4.2%
—
#49
Hawaii
3.5%
—
#50
Massachusetts
2.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of New Hampshire’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.
This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare New Hampshire with every state.
New Hampshire · 2020$11,793
New Hampshire rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal healthcare spending per resident
Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.
2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Hampshire
2020 · New Hampshire: $11,793 · Rank #11 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Hampshire Personal healthcare spending per resident history
Period
New Hampshire
Compare
2014
$9,367
2015
$9,763
2016
$10,157
2017
$10,573
2018
$10,974
2019
$11,310
2020
$11,793
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.
Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Hampshire · $11,7932020 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$14,007
—
#2
Alaska
$13,642
—
#3
Massachusetts
$13,319
—
#4
Delaware
$12,899
—
#5
West Virginia
$12,769
—
#6
Vermont
$12,756
—
#7
South Dakota
$12,495
—
#8
Connecticut
$12,489
—
#9
Maine
$12,077
—
#10
New Jersey
$11,868
—
#11
New Hampshire · your comparison
$11,793
—
#12
Rhode Island
$11,694
—
#13
Pennsylvania
$11,603
—
#14
North Dakota
$11,301
—
#15
Wyoming
$10,989
—
#16
Minnesota
$10,846
—
#17
Maryland
$10,839
—
#18
Indiana
$10,517
—
#19
Louisiana
$10,515
—
#20
Nebraska
$10,514
—
#21
Ohio
$10,478
—
#22
California
$10,299
—
#23
Hawaii
$10,291
—
#24
Kentucky
$10,257
—
#25
Montana
$10,212
—
#26
Illinois
$10,190
—
#27
Oregon
$10,071
—
#28
Wisconsin
$9,982
—
#29
Missouri
$9,921
—
#30
Michigan
$9,897
—
#31
Florida
$9,865
—
#32
Iowa
$9,789
—
#33
Oklahoma
$9,444
—
#34
Kansas
$9,408
—
#35
Mississippi
$9,394
—
#36
Arkansas
$9,338
—
#37
Tennessee
$9,336
—
#38
Alabama
$9,280
—
#39
Washington
$9,265
—
#40
Virginia
$9,195
—
#41
North Carolina
$8,917
—
#42
New Mexico
$8,902
—
#43
South Carolina
$8,766
—
#44
Georgia
$8,758
—
#45
Arizona
$8,756
—
#46
Colorado
$8,583
—
#47
Texas
$8,406
—
#48
Nevada
$8,348
—
#49
Idaho
$8,148
—
#50
Utah
$7,522
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.
New Hampshire · 202278.7 years
New Hampshire rank#10among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Life expectancy at birth
FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total New Hampshire population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.
The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Hampshire
2022 · New Hampshire: 78.7 years · Rank #10 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Hampshire Life expectancy at birth history
Period
New Hampshire
Compare
2018
79.1 years
2019
79.4 years
2020
79 years
2021
78.5 years
2022
78.7 years
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.
Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Hampshire · 78.7 years2022 · Rank #10 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
80 years
—
#2
Massachusetts
79.8 years
—
#3
New Jersey
79.6 years
—
#4
New York
79.5 years
—
#5
Connecticut
79.4 years
—
#6
California
79.3 years
—
#6
Minnesota
79.3 years
—
#8
Rhode Island
79.2 years
—
#9
Utah
79 years
—
#10
New Hampshire · your comparison
78.7 years
—
#11
Colorado
78.5 years
—
#12
Idaho
78.4 years
—
#12
Washington
78.4 years
—
#14
Nebraska
78.3 years
—
#14
Vermont
78.3 years
—
#16
Wisconsin
78.1 years
—
#17
Florida
77.9 years
—
#17
Iowa
77.9 years
—
#17
North Dakota
77.9 years
—
#20
Maryland
77.8 years
—
#21
Oregon
77.7 years
—
#22
Illinois
77.5 years
—
#22
Virginia
77.5 years
—
#24
Montana
77.3 years
—
#24
Pennsylvania
77.3 years
—
#24
South Dakota
77.3 years
—
#27
Texas
77.1 years
—
#28
Michigan
76.8 years
—
#28
Wyoming
76.8 years
—
#30
Arizona
76.7 years
—
#31
Maine
76.6 years
—
#32
Delaware
76.5 years
—
#32
Kansas
76.5 years
—
#34
Nevada
76.4 years
—
#35
Georgia
75.9 years
—
#35
North Carolina
75.9 years
—
#37
Alaska
75.8 years
—
#38
Ohio
75.6 years
—
#39
Indiana
75.4 years
—
#40
Missouri
75.2 years
—
#41
South Carolina
75.1 years
—
#42
New Mexico
74.5 years
—
#43
Arkansas
73.9 years
—
#44
Alabama
73.8 years
—
#44
Louisiana
73.8 years
—
#44
Oklahoma
73.8 years
—
#44
Tennessee
73.8 years
—
#48
Kentucky
73.6 years
—
#49
Mississippi
72.6 years
—
#50
West Virginia
72.2 years
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.
New Hampshire · 20237.9%
New Hampshire rank#46among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted
Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.
Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
New Hampshire
2023 · New Hampshire: 7.9% · Rank #46 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
New Hampshire Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
Period
New Hampshire
Compare
2019
8.1%
2020
7.5%
2021
7.3%
2022
8.2%
2023
7.9%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.
Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Hampshire · 7.9%2023 · Rank #46 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 7.1% – 8.8%Selected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Hampshire with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Mississippi
15.1%
95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1
West Virginia
15.1%
95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3
Louisiana
14.6%
95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4
Alabama
14%
95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5
Arkansas
13.1%
95% CI: 12–14.3
#6
South Carolina
12.7%
95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6
Tennessee
12.7%
95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8
Texas
12.1%
95% CI: 11–13.3
#9
Indiana
11.7%
95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10
Georgia
11.5%
95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10
Ohio
11.5%
95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12
Oklahoma
11.3%
95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13
Delaware
11.1%
95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14
North Carolina
11%
95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15
Illinois
10.9%
95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15
Maryland
10.9%
95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15
Michigan
10.9%
95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18
Nevada
10.8%
95% CI: 8.9–13
#18
New Mexico
10.8%
95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20
Missouri
10.7%
95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20
South Dakota
10.7%
95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22
California
10.6%
95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23
Kansas
10.5%
95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24
Virginia
10.4%
95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25
Florida
10.1%
95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26
Rhode Island
10%
95% CI: 9.1–11
#27
Arizona
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27
Iowa
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29
Nebraska
9.7%
95% CI: 9–10.3
#30
Wisconsin
9.6%
95% CI: 9–10.2
#31
Hawaii
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31
New York
9.5%
95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31
Oregon
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34
Wyoming
9.4%
95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35
Minnesota
9.3%
95% CI: 8.6–10
#36
New Jersey
9.1%
95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37
Maine
9%
95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38
North Dakota
8.9%
95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39
Idaho
8.7%
95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40
Washington
8.6%
95% CI: 8.2–9
#41
Massachusetts
8.5%
95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42
Connecticut
8.4%
95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43
Alaska
8.2%
95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44
Utah
8.1%
95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45
Colorado
8%
95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46
Montana
7.9%
95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46
New Hampshire · your comparison
7.9%
95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48
Vermont
7.8%
95% CI: 7–8.7
—
Kentucky
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Pennsylvania
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.
New Hampshire · June 30, 202674.8%
New Hampshire rank#4among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Primary care · need met
HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.
National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Hampshire · 74.8%June 30, 2026 · Rank #4 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Jersey
83.2%
—
#2
Vermont
82.6%
—
#3
South Carolina
79.4%
—
#4
New Hampshire · your comparison
74.8%
—
#5
Rhode Island
74.3%
—
#6
Louisiana
72.1%
—
#7
Hawaii
67.1%
—
#8
Utah
65.4%
—
#9
Wisconsin
65.2%
—
#10
Alabama
63%
—
#11
Connecticut
60.3%
—
#12
Massachusetts
58%
—
#13
Tennessee
58%
—
#14
Virginia
57.2%
—
#15
Pennsylvania
56.7%
—
#16
Maine
56%
—
#17
Minnesota
55.4%
—
#18
Wyoming
54.4%
—
#19
Indiana
54.2%
—
#20
California
53.2%
—
#21
Arkansas
52.6%
—
#22
Texas
49.8%
—
#23
Ohio
49.7%
—
#24
Nebraska
49.1%
—
#25
Alaska
48.9%
—
#26
North Carolina
48.1%
—
#27
Colorado
47.5%
—
#28
Michigan
44.9%
—
#29
Oregon
43.9%
—
#30
Idaho
43.9%
—
#31
Washington
42.4%
—
#32
Illinois
41.5%
—
#33
Nevada
41.5%
—
#34
Arizona
41.2%
—
#35
Kansas
41.1%
—
#36
Iowa
40.5%
—
#37
Florida
39.7%
—
#38
Georgia
39.1%
—
#39
Montana
38.5%
—
#40
West Virginia
38.3%
—
#41
North Dakota
36.5%
—
#42
New York
35.3%
—
#43
South Dakota
34.6%
—
#44
Mississippi
34.1%
—
#45
Maryland
31.6%
—
#46
New Mexico
31.4%
—
#47
Kentucky
30.8%
—
#48
Oklahoma
28.6%
—
#49
Missouri
23.7%
—
#50
Delaware
11.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.
New Hampshire · 2020$7,991
New Hampshire rank#3among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Single coverage premium · all firms
Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.
Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.
Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Hampshire · $7,9912020 · Rank #3 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alaska
$8,635
—
#2
New York
$8,177
—
#3
New Hampshire · your comparison
$7,991
—
#4
Vermont
$7,868
—
#5
Wyoming
$7,743
—
#6
Nebraska
$7,611
—
#7
South Carolina
$7,516
—
#8
Connecticut
$7,501
—
#9
Maine
$7,496
—
#10
Massachusetts
$7,452
—
#11
Washington
$7,440
—
#12
New Mexico
$7,424
—
#13
Illinois
$7,376
—
#14
New Jersey
$7,373
—
#15
Maryland
$7,352
—
#16
Rhode Island
$7,326
—
#17
Indiana
$7,319
—
#18
Delaware
$7,280
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7,250
—
#20
Pennsylvania
$7,246
—
#21
North Dakota
$7,216
—
#22
Colorado
$7,206
—
#23
Missouri
$7,179
—
#24
California
$7,173
—
#25
Florida
$7,078
—
#26
South Dakota
$7,070
—
#27
Oklahoma
$7,058
—
#28
Hawaii
$7,040
—
#29
North Carolina
$7,036
—
#30
Texas
$7,017
—
#31
West Virginia
$6,993
—
#32
Ohio
$6,989
—
#33
Kentucky
$6,949
—
#34
Iowa
$6,932
—
#35
Virginia
$6,928
—
#36
Oregon
$6,917
—
#37
Minnesota
$6,910
—
#38
Georgia
$6,876
—
#39
Montana
$6,860
—
#40
Idaho
$6,744
—
#41
Louisiana
$6,713
—
#42
Michigan
$6,683
—
#43
Kansas
$6,675
—
#44
Arizona
$6,612
—
#45
Utah
$6,593
—
#46
Mississippi
$6,561
—
#47
Nevada
$6,493
—
#48
Tennessee
$6,485
—
#49
Arkansas
$6,414
—
#50
Alabama
$6,393
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.
New Hampshire · 2023–202427.7%
New Hampshire rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+
Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.
Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. New Hampshire stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. New Hampshire has a dark outline.
Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
New Hampshire · 27.7%2023–2024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare New Hampshire with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Oregon
31.6%
—
#2
Vermont
29.1%
—
#3
West Virginia
28.1%
—
#4
Washington
27.9%
—
#5
New Hampshire · your comparison
27.7%
—
#6
Tennessee
27%
—
#7
Utah
26.7%
—
#8
Maine
26.7%
—
#9
Arkansas
26.6%
—
#10
Colorado
26.4%
—
#11
Rhode Island
25.8%
—
#12
Missouri
25.7%
—
#13
Montana
25.6%
—
#14
Indiana
25.3%
—
#15
Kentucky
25.3%
—
#16
Georgia
25.2%
—
#17
Iowa
25%
—
#18
Massachusetts
24.9%
—
#19
Wyoming
24.7%
—
#20
Nevada
24.6%
—
#21
Arizona
24.6%
—
#22
Wisconsin
24.6%
—
#23
Idaho
24.5%
—
#24
Nebraska
24.1%
—
#25
Louisiana
24.1%
—
#26
Alaska
24%
—
#27
Pennsylvania
23.9%
—
#28
New Mexico
23.9%
—
#28
Ohio
23.9%
—
#30
Connecticut
23.7%
—
#31
Kansas
23.7%
—
#32
Michigan
23.6%
—
#33
Virginia
23.1%
—
#34
Alabama
23%
—
#35
North Dakota
23%
—
#36
Maryland
22.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
22.6%
—
#38
Minnesota
22.6%
—
#39
Illinois
22.2%
—
#40
Delaware
22.1%
—
#41
New York
21.9%
—
#42
South Dakota
21.8%
—
#43
California
21.6%
—
#44
North Carolina
21.4%
—
#45
Florida
20.8%
—
#46
Texas
20.7%
—
#47
Mississippi
20.5%
—
#48
Hawaii
19.8%
—
#49
South Carolina
19.8%
—
#50
New Jersey
18.1%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
8 of 8 reviewed New Hampshire actions · newest first
Jul 15, 2026 · HB 1365 · (Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners. · Enacted · Chapter 325New Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325
Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 15, 2026 · HB 1365 · (Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners. · SignedGovernor · HB 1365
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Kelly Ayotte · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kelly Ayotte signed HB 1365. The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
relative to the assault of emergency room personnel.
Jul 2, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Kelly Ayotte · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kelly Ayotte signed SB 667. SB 667 adds first-degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily injury to emergency-room personnel acting in the line of duty, and second-degree assault for knowingly causing bodily injury to such personnel. Its definition includes listed staff and volunteers, and the law takes effect January 1, 2027. The fact connection concerns aggravated-assault components, not every injury under the law or proof of fewer offenses.
Chapter 277, approved 2026-07-02. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The FBI violent-crime measure includes aggravated assault. Serious-injury assaults and federal criminal-defense rules concern components of violent crime; simple assault and every offense within the bills are not automatically included in the FBI measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
277:1 Assault and Related Offenses; First Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:1, I(e) to read as follows: (e) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (f) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:2 Assault and Related Offenses; Second Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:2, I(g) to read as follows: (g) Knowingly causes bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (h) Knowingly causes bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 2, 2026 · SB 667 · relative to the assault of emergency room personnel. · Enacted · Chapter 277New Hampshire Legislature · SB 667
relative to the assault of emergency room personnel.
Jul 2, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 277
Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Kevin A. Avard · Sponsored / Sen. Bill M. Gannon · Sponsored / Sen. David Rochefort · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 667 adds first-degree assault for knowingly causing serious bodily injury to emergency-room personnel acting in the line of duty, and second-degree assault for knowingly causing bodily injury to such personnel. Its definition includes listed staff and volunteers, and the law takes effect January 1, 2027. The fact connection concerns aggravated-assault components, not every injury under the law or proof of fewer offenses.
Chapter 277, approved 2026-07-02. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The FBI violent-crime measure includes aggravated assault. Serious-injury assaults and federal criminal-defense rules concern components of violent crime; simple assault and every offense within the bills are not automatically included in the FBI measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
277:1 Assault and Related Offenses; First Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:1, I(e) to read as follows: (e) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (f) Knowingly causes serious bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:2 Assault and Related Offenses; Second Degree Assault. Amend RSA 631:2, I(g) to read as follows: (g) Knowingly causes bodily injury to a law enforcement officer, a paid firefighter, volunteer firefighter, on-call firefighter, or licensed emergency medical care provider as defined in RSA 153-A:2, V, acting in the line of duty; or commits such an act against a law enforcement officer whether or not the officer is on duty, where the purpose was to harm the officer because of his or her present or previous employment as a law enforcement officer[]; or (h) Knowingly causes bodily injury to any emergency room personnel acting in the line of duty. For purposes of this subparagraph, "emergency room personnel" means a person in a hospital emergency department who, in the course and scope of their employment or as a volunteer, provides services or medical care, or who assists in the providing of services or medical care, for the benefit of the general public, including, but not limited to, any health care professional, emergency department clerk, emergency department technician, student, and emergency department volunteer working in the hospital emergency department. 277:3 Effective Date. This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 27, 2026 · SB 134 · relative to work requirements under the state Medicaid program. · Enacted · Chapter 18New Hampshire Legislature · SB 134
relative to work requirements under the state Medicaid program.
Mar 27, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 18
Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Timothy Lang · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Sen. Bill M. Gannon · Sponsored / Rep. Jason M. Osborne · Sponsored / Rep. Michael I Moffett · Sponsored / Rep. Jess Edwards · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 134 requires applicable Granite Advantage Medicaid applicants to document compliance with federal community-engagement requirements for the month immediately before the application month. It rejects self-attestation and requires at least quarterly checks between redeterminations. People who fail to comply receive notice and 30 additional days to document compliance or an exemption before required disenrollment. Exemptions require verification; medical-frailty or special-needs exemptions require the specified professional certification and cannot exceed the stated federal definition. Optional exemptions and other program waivers require express oversight-committee approval. Federal requirements control conflicts. The law took effect March 27, 2026 and directs implementation documentation by December 1, 2026, or an earlier date within 30 days after publication of the federal application template, after fiscal-committee review. It suspends the prior state community-engagement provisions for the duration of the federal requirements. Enactment does not establish actual disenrollments or a change in the uninsured rate.
Chapter 18, approved 2026-03-27. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact counts residents under 65 without insurance. Medicaid eligibility requirements and marketplace premium assistance concern obtaining or retaining coverage; neither establishes the number enrolled or a change in the uninsured share. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
18:1 New Sections; New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program; Work Requirements. Amend RSA 126-AA by inserting after section 5 the following new sections: 126-AA:6 Work Requirements. I. In this section: (a) “Applicable individual” means an individual described in 42 U.S.C. section 1396a(xx)(9)(A) who is eligible for the granite advantage health care program, and who is subject to work requirements. (b) “Work requirements” mean the Medicaid community engagement and work requirements established under Section 71119 of Public Law No. 119-21. II. No applicable individual shall be enrolled in Medicaid unless, at the time of application, the individual demonstrates compliance with the work requirements for the one month immediately preceding the month during which the individual applies. The department of health and human services shall require documentary evidence and shall not accept self-attestation at the time of application. III. The department of health and human services shall verify an applicable individual’s compliance with documentary evidence. Verification shall occur on an ongoing basis, at least quarterly between redetermination periods. Self-attestation shall not be accepted. IV. The department of health and human services may rely on ex parte records and or documentary evidence provided by the applicable individual to verify exemption from work requirements. The department of health and human services shall verify all exemptions and shall not accept self-attestation from individuals seeking exemptions. V. The department of health and human services shall not seek or implement any additional optional exemptions under 42 U.S.C. section 1396a(xx)(3)(B) or other program waivers without obtaining express approval of the oversight committee on health and human services established in RSA 126-A:13. VI. The department of health and human services shall only approve an exemption for an individual based on the status of medically frailty or otherwise an individual with special needs if the individual has been medically certified per a statement from a physician, physician associate, nurse, nurse practitioner, designated representative of the physician’s office, a licensed or certified psychologist, or a social worker, as having disabling mental disorders, having a physical, intellectual, or developmental disability that significantly impairs their ability to perform activities of daily living, including eating, dressing, bathing, grooming, getting in and out of bed and chairs, walking, going outdoors, using the toilet, or is in treatment for a chronic substance use disorder. In no case may the department of health and human services expand the definition of an individual who is medically frail or otherwise an individual with special needs beyond the scope of the definition established under 42 C.F.R. section 440.315 unless as otherwise modified in Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025). VII. Any applicable individual who fails to comply with the work requirements shall be provided notice and an additional 30 days to supply verification of compliance or exemption. After the 30-day notice period, the department of health and human services shall disenroll any applicable individual who does not demonstrate compliance with the work requirements or qualify for an exemption. VIII. In the event of a conflict between this section and the requirements of Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), the requirements of the federal statute or regulation shall control. 126-AA:7 Severability. If any portion of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable. 18:2 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program; Community Engagement and Work Requirements. Amend 2025, 141:412 to read as follows: 141:412 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program, [] Community Engagement and Work Requirements. I. On or before [] December 1, 2026, or on an earlier date within 30 calendar days after publication of the federal application template, the department of health and human services shall [] submit to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) [] required documentation relative to implementing community engagement and work requirements as a condition of Granite Advantage eligibility in accordance with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025). Prior to submitting the [] required documentation to CMS, the department shall submit the proposed [] plan to implement community engagement and work requirements to the fiscal committee of the general court for [] review. II. Beginning November 1, 2025 and [] quarterly thereafter through December 31, 2026, and then annually thereafter, the department shall provide a report regarding the status of the [] plan under review by CMS and implementation of the community engagement and work requirements [] eligibility in accordance with Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), to the senate president, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate clerk, the house clerk, and the governor. 18:3 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program Established; Community Engagement and Work Requirements; Suspended. The provisions of RSA 126-AA:2, directly related to the community engagement and work requirements, shall be suspended for the duration of the federal community engagement and work requirements under Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), as amended. If the federal community engagement and work requirements are subsequently eliminated, the commissioner of the department of health and human services shall immediately certify in writing the removal of the suspension to the director of the office of legislative services, the secretary of state, the senate president, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate clerk, the house clerk, and the governor. 18:4 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program Established. Amend RSA 126-AA:2, I(a) to read as follows: I.(a) The commissioner shall apply for any necessary waivers and state plan amendments to implement [] and administer the New Hampshire granite advantage health care program which shall be funded exclusively from non-general fund sources, including federal funds. The commissioner shall include in an application for the necessary waivers submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) a waiver of the requirement to provide 90-day retroactive coverage and a state plan amendment allowing state and county correctional facilities to conduct presumptive eligibility determinations for incarcerated inmates to the extent provided under federal law. To receive coverage under the program, those individuals in the new adult group who are eligible for benefits shall choose coverage offered by one of the managed care organizations (MCOs) awarded contracts as vendors under Medicaid managed care, pursuant to RSA 126-A:5, XIX(a). The program shall make coverage available in a cost-effective manner and shall provide cost transparency measures, and ensure that patients are utilizing the most appropriate level of care. Cost effectiveness shall be achieved by offering cash incentives and other forms of incentives to the insured by choosing preferred lower cost medical providers. Loss of incentives shall also be employed. MCOs shall employ reference-based pricing, cost transparency, and the use of incentives and loss of incentives to the Medicaid and newly eligible population. For the purposes of this subparagraph, "reference-based pricing" means setting a maximum amount payable for certain medical procedures. 18:5 Effective Date. This act shall take effect upon its passage.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 27, 2026 · SB 134 · relative to work requirements under the state Medicaid program. · SignedGovernor · SB 134
relative to work requirements under the state Medicaid program.
Mar 27, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Kelly Ayotte · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Kelly Ayotte signed SB 134. SB 134 requires applicable Granite Advantage Medicaid applicants to document compliance with federal community-engagement requirements for the month immediately before the application month. It rejects self-attestation and requires at least quarterly checks between redeterminations. People who fail to comply receive notice and 30 additional days to document compliance or an exemption before required disenrollment. Exemptions require verification; medical-frailty or special-needs exemptions require the specified professional certification and cannot exceed the stated federal definition. Optional exemptions and other program waivers require express oversight-committee approval. Federal requirements control conflicts. The law took effect March 27, 2026 and directs implementation documentation by December 1, 2026, or an earlier date within 30 days after publication of the federal application template, after fiscal-committee review. It suspends the prior state community-engagement provisions for the duration of the federal requirements. Enactment does not establish actual disenrollments or a change in the uninsured rate.
Chapter 18, approved 2026-03-27. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact counts residents under 65 without insurance. Medicaid eligibility requirements and marketplace premium assistance concern obtaining or retaining coverage; neither establishes the number enrolled or a change in the uninsured share. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
18:1 New Sections; New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program; Work Requirements. Amend RSA 126-AA by inserting after section 5 the following new sections: 126-AA:6 Work Requirements. I. In this section: (a) “Applicable individual” means an individual described in 42 U.S.C. section 1396a(xx)(9)(A) who is eligible for the granite advantage health care program, and who is subject to work requirements. (b) “Work requirements” mean the Medicaid community engagement and work requirements established under Section 71119 of Public Law No. 119-21. II. No applicable individual shall be enrolled in Medicaid unless, at the time of application, the individual demonstrates compliance with the work requirements for the one month immediately preceding the month during which the individual applies. The department of health and human services shall require documentary evidence and shall not accept self-attestation at the time of application. III. The department of health and human services shall verify an applicable individual’s compliance with documentary evidence. Verification shall occur on an ongoing basis, at least quarterly between redetermination periods. Self-attestation shall not be accepted. IV. The department of health and human services may rely on ex parte records and or documentary evidence provided by the applicable individual to verify exemption from work requirements. The department of health and human services shall verify all exemptions and shall not accept self-attestation from individuals seeking exemptions. V. The department of health and human services shall not seek or implement any additional optional exemptions under 42 U.S.C. section 1396a(xx)(3)(B) or other program waivers without obtaining express approval of the oversight committee on health and human services established in RSA 126-A:13. VI. The department of health and human services shall only approve an exemption for an individual based on the status of medically frailty or otherwise an individual with special needs if the individual has been medically certified per a statement from a physician, physician associate, nurse, nurse practitioner, designated representative of the physician’s office, a licensed or certified psychologist, or a social worker, as having disabling mental disorders, having a physical, intellectual, or developmental disability that significantly impairs their ability to perform activities of daily living, including eating, dressing, bathing, grooming, getting in and out of bed and chairs, walking, going outdoors, using the toilet, or is in treatment for a chronic substance use disorder. In no case may the department of health and human services expand the definition of an individual who is medically frail or otherwise an individual with special needs beyond the scope of the definition established under 42 C.F.R. section 440.315 unless as otherwise modified in Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025). VII. Any applicable individual who fails to comply with the work requirements shall be provided notice and an additional 30 days to supply verification of compliance or exemption. After the 30-day notice period, the department of health and human services shall disenroll any applicable individual who does not demonstrate compliance with the work requirements or qualify for an exemption. VIII. In the event of a conflict between this section and the requirements of Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), the requirements of the federal statute or regulation shall control. 126-AA:7 Severability. If any portion of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable. 18:2 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program; Community Engagement and Work Requirements. Amend 2025, 141:412 to read as follows: 141:412 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program, [] Community Engagement and Work Requirements. I. On or before [] December 1, 2026, or on an earlier date within 30 calendar days after publication of the federal application template, the department of health and human services shall [] submit to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) [] required documentation relative to implementing community engagement and work requirements as a condition of Granite Advantage eligibility in accordance with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025). Prior to submitting the [] required documentation to CMS, the department shall submit the proposed [] plan to implement community engagement and work requirements to the fiscal committee of the general court for [] review. II. Beginning November 1, 2025 and [] quarterly thereafter through December 31, 2026, and then annually thereafter, the department shall provide a report regarding the status of the [] plan under review by CMS and implementation of the community engagement and work requirements [] eligibility in accordance with Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), to the senate president, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate clerk, the house clerk, and the governor. 18:3 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program Established; Community Engagement and Work Requirements; Suspended. The provisions of RSA 126-AA:2, directly related to the community engagement and work requirements, shall be suspended for the duration of the federal community engagement and work requirements under Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), as amended. If the federal community engagement and work requirements are subsequently eliminated, the commissioner of the department of health and human services shall immediately certify in writing the removal of the suspension to the director of the office of legislative services, the secretary of state, the senate president, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate clerk, the house clerk, and the governor. 18:4 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program Established. Amend RSA 126-AA:2, I(a) to read as follows: I.(a) The commissioner shall apply for any necessary waivers and state plan amendments to implement [] and administer the New Hampshire granite advantage health care program which shall be funded exclusively from non-general fund sources, including federal funds. The commissioner shall include in an application for the necessary waivers submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) a waiver of the requirement to provide 90-day retroactive coverage and a state plan amendment allowing state and county correctional facilities to conduct presumptive eligibility determinations for incarcerated inmates to the extent provided under federal law. To receive coverage under the program, those individuals in the new adult group who are eligible for benefits shall choose coverage offered by one of the managed care organizations (MCOs) awarded contracts as vendors under Medicaid managed care, pursuant to RSA 126-A:5, XIX(a). The program shall make coverage available in a cost-effective manner and shall provide cost transparency measures, and ensure that patients are utilizing the most appropriate level of care. Cost effectiveness shall be achieved by offering cash incentives and other forms of incentives to the insured by choosing preferred lower cost medical providers. Loss of incentives shall also be employed. MCOs shall employ reference-based pricing, cost transparency, and the use of incentives and loss of incentives to the Medicaid and newly eligible population. For the purposes of this subparagraph, "reference-based pricing" means setting a maximum amount payable for certain medical procedures. 18:5 Effective Date. This act shall take effect upon its passage.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified New Hampshire officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s New Hampshire candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
21 statements from 9 candidates
2026 New Hampshire Governor General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 3 statements
A bill to begin the process might specify that people moving into New Hampshire after a certain date would have no positive rights. They'd be required to sign a waiver acknowledging that the government won't provide them with food, housing, health care, or education for their children. But those alr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Issues
Candidate campaign source
A bill to begin the process might specify that people moving into New Hampshire after a certain date would have no positive rights. They'd be required to sign a waiver acknowledging that the government won't provide them with food, housing, health care, or education for their children. But those already here who aren't libertarian would be grandfathered into the benefits they have now. The goal is to avoid a sudden drastic reduction in quality of life for anyone.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026
Pass legislation introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders to expand Medicare to cover dental, vision, and hearing – essential care that two thirds of seniors need.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis
Candidate campaign source
Pass legislation introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders to expand Medicare to cover dental, vision, and hearing – essential care that two thirds of seniors need.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Getting people the care they need and can afford is my bottom line. I’m with Bernie Sanders and support Medicare for All. We need a public option in this country, which means keeping every option to on the table to deliver necessary change. We have to fundamentally rebuild. Insurance companies shoul…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis
Candidate campaign source
Getting people the care they need and can afford is my bottom line. I’m with Bernie Sanders and support Medicare for All. We need a public option in this country, which means keeping every option to on the table to deliver necessary change. We have to fundamentally rebuild. Insurance companies should never dictate the care people receive.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Prevent AI from making decisions that should be made by doctors. The Trump Administration is getting ready to launch a program that would allow AI to deny coverage and care to people on Medicare – that would affect more than 350,000 Granite Staters. Doctors and nurses should be making decisions abou…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis
Candidate campaign source
Prevent AI from making decisions that should be made by doctors. The Trump Administration is getting ready to launch a program that would allow AI to deny coverage and care to people on Medicare – that would affect more than 350,000 Granite Staters. Doctors and nurses should be making decisions about health care, not computer algorithms.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Break up the corporate monopolies taking over the entire health care system, buying up hospitals, primary care practices, pharmacies, everything, and taking a cut at every stop, raising costs for all of us. I’ll fight to stop big Wall Street banks and investment firms building these monopolies and g…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis
Candidate campaign source
Break up the corporate monopolies taking over the entire health care system, buying up hospitals, primary care practices, pharmacies, everything, and taking a cut at every stop, raising costs for all of us. I’ll fight to stop big Wall Street banks and investment firms building these monopolies and getting richer by raising costs for everyone.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Social Security and Medicare are programs our seniors have paid into their whole working lives. Seniors can count on me to fight for them and protect those earned benefits. We must strengthen the protections of these benefits by severely limiting Federal Government borrowing from the Social Security…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Social Security and Medicare
Candidate campaign source
Social Security and Medicare are programs our seniors have paid into their whole working lives. Seniors can count on me to fight for them and protect those earned benefits. We must strengthen the protections of these benefits by severely limiting Federal Government borrowing from the Social Security Trust Fund. Social Security is not a political slush fund; this is money the Federal Government should not play with.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis
Candidate campaign source
Maggie believes deeply that Congress can and must be on the frontlines of the fight for ensuring a fair deal for all Granite Staters. The fight for a fair deal means protecting Social Security, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act. It means expanding access to affordable healthcare and prescription drugs, and making childcare, elder care, and housing more affordable. It means building a tax system that works for hardworking Granite Staters by delivering tax breaks for working families – not handouts to billionaires and big corporations. It means protecting the rights of workers, including to collectively bargain, and raising the minimum wage. It also means legalizing marijuana at the federal level and delivering meaningful and much-needed criminal justice reforms.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
No one believes more deeply in freedom than we do here in the Live Free or Die Granite State. In Congress, Maggie will fight to restore, defend, and expand our basic freedoms – from the freedom to access the reproductive healthcare you need to the freedom to live as your authentic self. Because of h…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reproductive health and civil rights
Candidate campaign source
No one believes more deeply in freedom than we do here in the Live Free or Die Granite State. In Congress, Maggie will fight to restore, defend, and expand our basic freedoms – from the freedom to access the reproductive healthcare you need to the freedom to live as your authentic self. Because of her experience over the past 15 years, Maggie knows how to fight these fights and deliver for New Hampshire. She clerked on the U.S. Supreme Court; she has worked in both houses of the U.S. Congress; and she served as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Maggie believes that healthcare is a right, not a privilege, and that mental healthcare is healthcare. Period. In Congress, Maggie will fight to make healthcare more affordable and accessible for all Americans, including by taking on big health insurers and Big Pharma.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care and the opioid crisis
Candidate campaign source
Maggie believes that healthcare is a right, not a privilege, and that mental healthcare is healthcare. Period. In Congress, Maggie will fight to make healthcare more affordable and accessible for all Americans, including by taking on big health insurers and Big Pharma.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The day Roe v. Wade was overturned, Maggie was working at the Justice Department and helped launch its Reproductive Rights Task Force to ensure patients and providers across America had access to the legal assistance they needed in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. Like so many…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Abortion, contraception, and IVF
Candidate campaign source
The day Roe v. Wade was overturned, Maggie was working at the Justice Department and helped launch its Reproductive Rights Task Force to ensure patients and providers across America had access to the legal assistance they needed in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs. Like so many across New Hampshire and our nation, the fight for reproductive freedom is deeply personal for Maggie. Last year, she was almost 20 weeks pregnant when she and her husband Jake lost their son and struggled to access the healthcare they needed because of delays caused by the Dobbs decision. In Congress, Maggie will fight like hell to defend access to the full range of reproductive healthcare, including abortion, contraceptives, and IVF. You can read about Maggie’s reproductive freedom agenda here.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published New Hampshire candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
New Hampshire incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current New Hampshire legislators and New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from New Hampshire’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
27 matching sponsorships or proposals · 22 New Hampshire incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 17 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Daniel Popovici-MullerNew Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325
Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Grafton 18 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Donald S McFarlaneNew Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325
Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325
Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Hillsborough 29 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Henry R GiassonNew Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325
Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Merrimack 25 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. James R ThibaultNew Hampshire Legislature · HB 1365
(Second New Title) relative to applications for licenses to carry a loaded pistol or revolver and relative to the composition of the board of dental examiners.
Jul 15, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 325
Rep. Donald S McFarlane · Sponsored / Rep. Daniel Popovici-Muller · Sponsored / Rep. James R Thibault · Sponsored / Rep. Erica J Layon · Sponsored / Rep. Henry R Giasson · Sponsored / Rep. Shane A Sirois · Sponsored / Rep. Tim E Mannion · Sponsored / Rep. Travis James Corcoran · Sponsored / Rep. Matt R Sabourin dit Choinière · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed pistol-license portion of HB 1365 limits application information to state form DSSP 85 as revised in March 2017 and bars requests for occupation, employer information or personal references. It prohibits consent or release language requiring disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric or other records beyond what that application expressly requires. The department must develop a consistent form through rulemaking, effective upon approval on July 15, 2026; the substantive form limits and repeal of that temporary rulemaking provision take effect January 1, 2027. This connection concerns licensing paperwork, not a new general requirement to obtain a carry license, the separate dental-board provisions or proof of a mortality effect.
Chapter 325, approved 2026-07-15. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The firearm mortality fact includes deaths across intents. Pistol-license application requirements concern firearm regulation, not a demonstrated change in access, ownership or firearm deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
325:1 Purpose. The general court finds that the pistol/revolver license application process must protect the privacy and constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. This act ensures that the form used by licensing authorities collects only the information required by law and does not compel applicants to waive rights not mandated by statute. 325:2 License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6, I(b) to read as follows: (b) The license shall be in duplicate and shall bear the name, address, description, and signature of the licensee and the name, title, and signature of the person issuing the license. The original shall be delivered to the licensee and the duplicate shall be preserved by the people issuing the same for 5 years. When required, license renewal shall take place within the month of the fifth anniversary of the license holder's date of birth following the date of issuance. The license shall be issued within 14 days after application, and, if such application is denied, the reason for such denial shall be stated in writing, the original of which such writing shall be delivered to the applicant, and a copy kept in the office of the person to whom the application was made. The fee for licenses issued to residents of the state shall be $10, which fee shall be for the use of the town or city granting said licenses; the fee for licenses granted to out-of-state residents shall be $100, which fee shall be for the use of the state. The director of state police is hereby authorized and directed to prepare forms for the licenses required under this chapter and forms for the application for such licenses and to supply the same to officials of the cities and towns authorized to issue the licenses. The form shall require no more information than was required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license, form DSSP 85, as revised in [] March 2017. The form shall not request or require disclosure of the applicant’s occupation, present employer, employer’s address, or personal references. The form shall not contain any consent or release language requiring the applicant to authorize disclosure of personal, employment, medical, psychiatric, or other records beyond what is expressly required on the state of New Hampshire application for pistol/revolver license. No other forms shall be used by officials of cities and towns. The cost of the forms shall be paid out of the fees received from nonresident licenses. […] 325:4 New Paragraph; License to Carry. Amend RSA 159:6 by inserting after paragraph III the following new paragraph: IV. The department of safety shall enter into rulemaking pursuant to RSA 541-A to develop a form consistent with paragraph I. 325:5 Prospective Repeal. RSA 159:6, IV, relative to rulemaking authority to create a new form, is repealed. 325:6 Effective Date. I. Sections 1, 2, and 5 of this act shall take effect January 1, 2027. II. Section 3 of this act shall take effect September 1, 2027. III. The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.
New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rockingham 2 · R–NH
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Jason M. OsborneNew Hampshire Legislature · SB 134
relative to work requirements under the state Medicaid program.
Mar 27, 2026 · Enacted · Chapter 18
Sen. Howard Pearl · Sponsored / Sen. Timothy Lang · Sponsored / Sen. Keith R. Murphy · Sponsored / Sen. Daniel E. Innis · Sponsored / Sen. Tim McGough · Sponsored / Sen. Bill M. Gannon · Sponsored / Rep. Jason M. Osborne · Sponsored / Rep. Michael I Moffett · Sponsored / Rep. Jess Edwards · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
SB 134 requires applicable Granite Advantage Medicaid applicants to document compliance with federal community-engagement requirements for the month immediately before the application month. It rejects self-attestation and requires at least quarterly checks between redeterminations. People who fail to comply receive notice and 30 additional days to document compliance or an exemption before required disenrollment. Exemptions require verification; medical-frailty or special-needs exemptions require the specified professional certification and cannot exceed the stated federal definition. Optional exemptions and other program waivers require express oversight-committee approval. Federal requirements control conflicts. The law took effect March 27, 2026 and directs implementation documentation by December 1, 2026, or an earlier date within 30 days after publication of the federal application template, after fiscal-committee review. It suspends the prior state community-engagement provisions for the duration of the federal requirements. Enactment does not establish actual disenrollments or a change in the uninsured rate.
Chapter 18, approved 2026-03-27. Approval, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact counts residents under 65 without insurance. Medicaid eligibility requirements and marketplace premium assistance concern obtaining or retaining coverage; neither establishes the number enrolled or a change in the uninsured share. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained New Hampshire evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
18:1 New Sections; New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program; Work Requirements. Amend RSA 126-AA by inserting after section 5 the following new sections: 126-AA:6 Work Requirements. I. In this section: (a) “Applicable individual” means an individual described in 42 U.S.C. section 1396a(xx)(9)(A) who is eligible for the granite advantage health care program, and who is subject to work requirements. (b) “Work requirements” mean the Medicaid community engagement and work requirements established under Section 71119 of Public Law No. 119-21. II. No applicable individual shall be enrolled in Medicaid unless, at the time of application, the individual demonstrates compliance with the work requirements for the one month immediately preceding the month during which the individual applies. The department of health and human services shall require documentary evidence and shall not accept self-attestation at the time of application. III. The department of health and human services shall verify an applicable individual’s compliance with documentary evidence. Verification shall occur on an ongoing basis, at least quarterly between redetermination periods. Self-attestation shall not be accepted. IV. The department of health and human services may rely on ex parte records and or documentary evidence provided by the applicable individual to verify exemption from work requirements. The department of health and human services shall verify all exemptions and shall not accept self-attestation from individuals seeking exemptions. V. The department of health and human services shall not seek or implement any additional optional exemptions under 42 U.S.C. section 1396a(xx)(3)(B) or other program waivers without obtaining express approval of the oversight committee on health and human services established in RSA 126-A:13. VI. The department of health and human services shall only approve an exemption for an individual based on the status of medically frailty or otherwise an individual with special needs if the individual has been medically certified per a statement from a physician, physician associate, nurse, nurse practitioner, designated representative of the physician’s office, a licensed or certified psychologist, or a social worker, as having disabling mental disorders, having a physical, intellectual, or developmental disability that significantly impairs their ability to perform activities of daily living, including eating, dressing, bathing, grooming, getting in and out of bed and chairs, walking, going outdoors, using the toilet, or is in treatment for a chronic substance use disorder. In no case may the department of health and human services expand the definition of an individual who is medically frail or otherwise an individual with special needs beyond the scope of the definition established under 42 C.F.R. section 440.315 unless as otherwise modified in Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025). VII. Any applicable individual who fails to comply with the work requirements shall be provided notice and an additional 30 days to supply verification of compliance or exemption. After the 30-day notice period, the department of health and human services shall disenroll any applicable individual who does not demonstrate compliance with the work requirements or qualify for an exemption. VIII. In the event of a conflict between this section and the requirements of Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), the requirements of the federal statute or regulation shall control. 126-AA:7 Severability. If any portion of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are severable. 18:2 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program; Community Engagement and Work Requirements. Amend 2025, 141:412 to read as follows: 141:412 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program, [] Community Engagement and Work Requirements. I. On or before [] December 1, 2026, or on an earlier date within 30 calendar days after publication of the federal application template, the department of health and human services shall [] submit to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) [] required documentation relative to implementing community engagement and work requirements as a condition of Granite Advantage eligibility in accordance with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025). Prior to submitting the [] required documentation to CMS, the department shall submit the proposed [] plan to implement community engagement and work requirements to the fiscal committee of the general court for [] review. II. Beginning November 1, 2025 and [] quarterly thereafter through December 31, 2026, and then annually thereafter, the department shall provide a report regarding the status of the [] plan under review by CMS and implementation of the community engagement and work requirements [] eligibility in accordance with Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), to the senate president, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate clerk, the house clerk, and the governor. 18:3 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program Established; Community Engagement and Work Requirements; Suspended. The provisions of RSA 126-AA:2, directly related to the community engagement and work requirements, shall be suspended for the duration of the federal community engagement and work requirements under Public Law 119-21, Section 71119 (2025), as amended. If the federal community engagement and work requirements are subsequently eliminated, the commissioner of the department of health and human services shall immediately certify in writing the removal of the suspension to the director of the office of legislative services, the secretary of state, the senate president, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate clerk, the house clerk, and the governor. 18:4 New Hampshire Granite Advantage Health Care Program Established. Amend RSA 126-AA:2, I(a) to read as follows: I.(a) The commissioner shall apply for any necessary waivers and state plan amendments to implement [] and administer the New Hampshire granite advantage health care program which shall be funded exclusively from non-general fund sources, including federal funds. The commissioner shall include in an application for the necessary waivers submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) a waiver of the requirement to provide 90-day retroactive coverage and a state plan amendment allowing state and county correctional facilities to conduct presumptive eligibility determinations for incarcerated inmates to the extent provided under federal law. To receive coverage under the program, those individuals in the new adult group who are eligible for benefits shall choose coverage offered by one of the managed care organizations (MCOs) awarded contracts as vendors under Medicaid managed care, pursuant to RSA 126-A:5, XIX(a). The program shall make coverage available in a cost-effective manner and shall provide cost transparency measures, and ensure that patients are utilizing the most appropriate level of care. Cost effectiveness shall be achieved by offering cash incentives and other forms of incentives to the insured by choosing preferred lower cost medical providers. Loss of incentives shall also be employed. MCOs shall employ reference-based pricing, cost transparency, and the use of incentives and loss of incentives to the Medicaid and newly eligible population. For the purposes of this subparagraph, "reference-based pricing" means setting a maximum amount payable for certain medical procedures. 18:5 Effective Date. This act shall take effect upon its passage.
Only current New Hampshire officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a New Hampshire statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
New Hampshire snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to New Hampshire, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.