Nevada · individual fact

Nevada income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Nevada’s tax structure.

Median household income$78.26K2020–2024 · #22 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$41.35K2020–2024 · #29 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$56.5K2024 · #31 of 50 · highest first

Nevada over time

Explore Nevada readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Nevada officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Nevada effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Nevada change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Nevada · source units
NevadaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $56,503$40.75K$51.06K$61.36KNevada, 2014: $42,748Nevada, 2015: $45,734Nevada, 2016: $46,911Nevada, 2017: $47,170Nevada, 2018: $50,297Nevada, 2019: $50,866Nevada, 2020: $53,903Nevada, 2021: $58,852Nevada, 2022: $56,149Nevada, 2023: $56,600Nevada, 2024: $56,503201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 42National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNevada · Nevada renewable portfolio law approved · 2019-04-22Renewable standard lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0Nevada · Nevada directs state employment review and office-return planning · 2023-01-06EO 2023-002National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNevada · Nevada housing law approved · 2025-06-09Housing law approvedNevada · Nevada education law approved · 2025-06-10Education law approvedNevada · Nevada housing funding law takes effect · 2025-07-01Housing funding startsNevada · Nevada education law’s first statutory stage · 2025-07-01First education-law stageNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings fundingNevada · Responsible data-center development standard · 2026-09-17EO 2026-005● Nevada Legislature · 41324222452● U.S. Congress · Nevada delegation · 4◆ Governor · 272524■ Nevada agencies · 22005-09-012026-09-30

74 of 74 reviewed Nevada actions match · 48 date markers shown. 42 major events shown separately.

Nevada · 2024: $56,503 · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Nevada Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodNevadaRankU.S. benchmark
2024$56,503#31 of 50$59,195
2023$56,600#28 of 50$58,088
2022$56,149#26 of 50$57,104
2021$58,852#22 of 50$59,365
2020$53,903#31 of 50$56,514
2019$50,866#32 of 50$53,683
2018$50,297#28 of 50$52,242
2017$47,170#37 of 50$51,006
2016$46,911#31 of 50$49,828
2015$45,734#36 of 50$49,396
2014$42,748#40 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Nevada · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Nevada · 2020–2024$78,260
Nevada rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nevada stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nevada has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nevada · $78,2602020–2024 · Rank #22 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $77,664 – $78,856Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nevada with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada · your comparison$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$78,2602020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Nevada households, expressed in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate.

  • Income is not take-home pay and does not directly measure taxes, wealth, prices, or purchasing power.
  • A statewide median obscures regional and household differences.
Nevada · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Nevada · 2024$56,503
Nevada rank#31among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nevada
Real personal income per person history in Nevada$40.26K$51.06K$61.86K20142024
2024 · Nevada: $56,503 · Rank #31 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nevada Real personal income per person history
PeriodNevadaCompare
2014$42,748
2015$45,734
2016$46,911
2017$47,170
2018$50,297
2019$50,866
2020$53,903
2021$58,852
2022$56,149
2023$56,600
2024$56,503

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nevada stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nevada has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nevada · $56,5032024 · Rank #31 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nevada with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada · your comparison$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nevada · state comparison

How Nevada raises taxes

Nevada does not impose a State tax on the wages or personal income of individuals. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Nevada · FY2024$0
Nevada rank#45among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nevada stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nevada has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nevada · $0FY2024 · Rank #45 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nevada with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada · your comparison$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Nevada income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Nevada ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Nevada candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

44 statements from 15 candidates

2026 Nevada Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Democratic · Attorney General · NV

Taxes & tax policy

Ban the Governor’s Office of Economic Development, local governments, and other agencies from using non-disclosure agreements and secret deals that hide the impact of data centers on tax revenue, utility loads, and water resources

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: DATA CENTERS

Candidate campaign source

Ban the Governor’s Office of Economic Development, local governments, and other agencies from using non-disclosure agreements and secret deals that hide the impact of data centers on tax revenue, utility loads, and water resources

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Nicole Jeanette Cannizzaro campaign source 10 ↗
View 2 more statements from Nicole Jeanette Cannizzaro
Income & wages

Take enforcement action against wage theft and worker misclassification.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Consumer and Worker Protection

Candidate campaign source

Take enforcement action against wage theft and worker misclassification.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Nicole Jeanette Cannizzaro — Part 69 verified source ↗
Income & wages

Protect workers' right to organize and enforce wage and benefit laws.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Consumer and Worker Protection

Candidate campaign source

Protect workers' right to organize and enforce wage and benefit laws.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Nicole Jeanette Cannizzaro — Part 69 verified source ↗

2026 Nevada Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 9 statements

Aaron D. Ford

9 statements

Democratic · Governor · NV

Taxes & tax policy

Support First-Time and Public Service Buyers: Only 6.1% of residents in Southern Nevada can afford a home on their own. That statistic alone shows how badly the system is failing every Nevadan who strives to own a home of their own. As Governor, Ford will bolster funding for down payment assistance …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 'Affordable Nevada' Plan

Candidate campaign source

Support First-Time and Public Service Buyers: Only 6.1% of residents in Southern Nevada can afford a home on their own. That statistic alone shows how badly the system is failing every Nevadan who strives to own a home of their own. As Governor, Ford will bolster funding for down payment assistance for first-time homebuyers, teachers, first responders, military families, and veterans using refundable tax credits.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Aaron D. Ford — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 8 more statements from Aaron D. Ford
Taxes & tax policy

A New Financial District: Having a financial district is a key way for Las Vegas to attract more high-tax businesses, reducing the tax burden on working families. Since his time as a state senator, Ford has been having conversations with stakeholders to bring a financial district to Las Vegas. As Go…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

A New Financial District: Having a financial district is a key way for Las Vegas to attract more high-tax businesses, reducing the tax burden on working families. Since his time as a state senator, Ford has been having conversations with stakeholders to bring a financial district to Las Vegas. As Governor, Ford will move the ball forward and work with businesses and the City of Las Vegas to bring a financial district to the Silver State.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Aaron D. Ford — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Promote residential solar installation: With its abundant sunshine, Nevada is a leader in solar energy utilization, ranking fourth in the nation for total electricity generation from utility and small-scale solar resources in 2024. The Big Beautiful Bill’s cuts to solar tax credits and the state’s i…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Promote residential solar installation: With its abundant sunshine, Nevada is a leader in solar energy utilization, ranking fourth in the nation for total electricity generation from utility and small-scale solar resources in 2024. The Big Beautiful Bill’s cuts to solar tax credits and the state’s increasing demand for solar could mean a $289 increase in annual energy costs for Nevada households by 2030. As Governor, Ford will work with state organizations like the Nevada Clean Energy Fund to implement and encourage uptake of programs that lower upfront costs and reduce monthly electric bills for homeowners and renters. Ford will also work with energy unions to create good energy jobs in solar that prioritize hiring local Nevadans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Aaron D. Ford — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Reevaluate Tax Abatements for Data Centers: With dozens of data centers being built in Nevada, it’s crucial for data centers to give back to Nevada communities, not harm them. General Ford has spent a decade holding corporations accountable to their promises and ensuring they serve the people of thi…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Water and drought resilience

Candidate campaign source

Reevaluate Tax Abatements for Data Centers: With dozens of data centers being built in Nevada, it’s crucial for data centers to give back to Nevada communities, not harm them. General Ford has spent a decade holding corporations accountable to their promises and ensuring they serve the people of this state, and that’s the approach he’ll take as Governor. He will revaluate the efficacy of current and future tax abatements to data centers and require strong economic justification for any tax dollar spent. He'll never allow data centers to use our state's resources without contributing to the betterment of Nevada families. Accordingly, Ford will require data centers to earn tax abatements by creating good-paying jobs each year, paying for the energy they use and the electrical grid updates required to deliver it, and use modern cooling systems that don’t use fresh water.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Aaron D. Ford — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Income & wages

While Joe Lombardo has failed to pay state workers on time on multiple occasions, Aaron Ford has stood with workers throughout his time in public service, from fighting to raise the minimum wage to laying the groundwork to expand collective bargaining rights to 20,000 public sector workers. As he fu…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

While Joe Lombardo has failed to pay state workers on time on multiple occasions, Aaron Ford has stood with workers throughout his time in public service, from fighting to raise the minimum wage to laying the groundwork to expand collective bargaining rights to 20,000 public sector workers. As he futurizes Nevada’s economy, Ford will ensure that workers reap the benefits of increased economic activity, are protected in the workplace, and have the opportunity to work and retire with dignity. Ford will never cut deals with billionaire CEOs to help them avoid accountability when workers are harmed.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Aaron D. Ford — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Income & wages

Create good-paying union energy jobs: Aaron Ford championed prevailing wage standards as a State Senator, and he will continue that commitment as Governor to make sure that energy projects in Nevada employ the most skilled and efficient workers possible. Ford will support Project Labor Agreements an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Labor and workers' rights

Candidate campaign source

Create good-paying union energy jobs: Aaron Ford championed prevailing wage standards as a State Senator, and he will continue that commitment as Governor to make sure that energy projects in Nevada employ the most skilled and efficient workers possible. Ford will support Project Labor Agreements and Community Benefits Agreements at energy projects so that local Nevadans benefit from the jobs created by energy investment.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Aaron D. Ford — candidate-owned primary source 6 ↗
Income & wages

Protect Collective Bargaining Rights: Ford knows that when workers can exercise their right to collectively bargain, wages go up for everyone. Workers in states without “right to work” laws are paid $1,600 more per year than similar workers in states like Nevada that have “right to work” laws in pla…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Protect Collective Bargaining Rights: Ford knows that when workers can exercise their right to collectively bargain, wages go up for everyone. Workers in states without “right to work” laws are paid $1,600 more per year than similar workers in states like Nevada that have “right to work” laws in place. “Right to work” laws also lower the likelihood that employers will offer health insurance and other benefits to their employees. Many of Nevada’s largest employers are able to operate profitably in states without right to work laws. Ford thinks Nevada workers deserve more. As Governor, he will repeal Nevada’s “right to work for less” law and support policies that grow and protect wages like project labor agreements and prevailing wage laws.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Aaron D. Ford — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Income & wages

As Governor, Aaron Ford will fight to open the doors of the American Dream to every Nevadan, no matter where in our state they live or how much money they make. He'll make Nevadans’ wages go farther by lowering costs for families, bringing Nevada’s economy into the 21st century, and empowering our s…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, Aaron Ford will fight to open the doors of the American Dream to every Nevadan, no matter where in our state they live or how much money they make. He'll make Nevadans’ wages go farther by lowering costs for families, bringing Nevada’s economy into the 21st century, and empowering our small business owners and workers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Aaron D. Ford — candidate-owned primary source 8 ↗
Income & wages

Cancel Medical Debt: As Governor, Ford will work with medical debt nonprofits to relieve debt for Nevadans whose annual income is at or below 400% of the federal poverty level or the medical debt owed is 5% or more of their annual income. With every $1 erasing $100 in medical debt on average, this p…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 'Affordable Nevada' Plan

Candidate campaign source

Cancel Medical Debt: As Governor, Ford will work with medical debt nonprofits to relieve debt for Nevadans whose annual income is at or below 400% of the federal poverty level or the medical debt owed is 5% or more of their annual income. With every $1 erasing $100 in medical debt on average, this partnership will relieve the burden of debt that’s crushing thousands of Nevadans across the state.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Aaron D. Ford — candidate-owned primary source 5 ↗

2026 Nevada Lieutenant Governor — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 6 statements

Janine Hansen

4 statements

Independent American · Lieutenant Governor · NV

Taxes & tax policy

Northern Nevada Director Nevadans for Sound Government (Axe the Tax) sponsoring referendum to repeal the $836 million tax increase and an initiative to prohibit government employees from serving in elected office 2004.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Biographical and Professional Information

Candidate campaign source

Northern Nevada Director Nevadans for Sound Government (Axe the Tax) sponsoring referendum to repeal the $836 million tax increase and an initiative to prohibit government employees from serving in elected office 2004.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Janine Hansen campaign source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Janine Hansen
Taxes & tax policy

The Lt. Governor is a member of the Board of Economic Development. We have witnessed many people leaving California in the last few years. Many of them come to live in Nevada. We have no state income tax and other taxes are lower than California. It is important to keep our taxes low. I would advoca…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

The Lt. Governor is a member of the Board of Economic Development. We have witnessed many people leaving California in the last few years. Many of them come to live in Nevada. We have no state income tax and other taxes are lower than California. It is important to keep our taxes low. I would advocate that lowering Nevada’s taxes would increase our economic growth and prosperity. When citizens and businesses keep more of their own money, they buy more, they invest more, they create more jobs and opportunities for all Nevadans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Janine Hansen — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Keep Nevada Taxes Low

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 2026 Lieutenant Governor Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Keep Nevada Taxes Low

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Janine Hansen — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Promote Economic Development Through Lower Taxes

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: 2026 Lieutenant Governor Priorities

Candidate campaign source

Promote Economic Development Through Lower Taxes

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Janine Hansen — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

Sandra Jauregui

1 statement

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · NV

Income & wages

Nevada’s economic future depends on creating good-paying jobs that match the skills and strengths of our workforce. Sandra has fought to invest in smart economic development by attracting and growing industries that are sustainable, low-water use, and invest in Nevada’s long-term needs. She also kno…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Water and drought resilience

Candidate campaign source

Nevada’s economic future depends on creating good-paying jobs that match the skills and strengths of our workforce. Sandra has fought to invest in smart economic development by attracting and growing industries that are sustainable, low-water use, and invest in Nevada’s long-term needs. She also knows that it is working families and unions that truly power Nevada and has a long record of protecting the rights, wages and benefits of workers. In 2025, Sandra was named Labor Champion of the Year by Southern Nevada Building Trades and she will continue to fight for working families as Lt. Governor by expanding partnerships with unions, community colleges, and businesses to create paid apprenticeships and job training programs that give Nevadans the skills they need to secure good-paying careers.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Sandra Jauregui — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Stavros Anthony

1 statement

Republican · Lieutenant Governor · NV

Taxes & tax policy

As our next Lieutenant Governor, Stavros will help lead our state’s economic recovery focusing on small business, continue to fight for safe streets and communities, promoting and advancing tourism, and work to promote election integrity, low taxes, and balanced budgets

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Gaming, tourism, and hospitality

Candidate campaign source

As our next Lieutenant Governor, Stavros will help lead our state’s economic recovery focusing on small business, continue to fight for safe streets and communities, promoting and advancing tourism, and work to promote election integrity, low taxes, and balanced budgets

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Stavros Anthony — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 3
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Nevada candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Nevada incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Nevada legislators and Nevada’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Nevada’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

69 matching sponsorships or proposals · 31 Nevada incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Assemblymember Cecelia González

Nevada Assembly, District 16 · D–NV

4 proposals
View proposals from Assemblymember Cecelia González
Nevada Legislature · AB390

Enacts provisions relating to task workers.

Apr 12, 2025 · Did not pass

Assemblymember Cecelia González · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Authorizes collective bargaining between task workers and task delivery platform providers; requires a task delivery platform provider to provide certain information to users and task workers; requires a task delivery platform provider to ensure that a task worker is paid an amount not less than the minimum wage for each hour worked performing tasks.

2025-04-12: (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.) The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

authorizing collective bargaining between task workers and task delivery platform providers; requiring a task delivery platform provider to provide certain information to users and task workers; requiring a task delivery platform provider to ensure that a task worker is paid an amount not less than the minimum wage for each hour worked performing tasks
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nevada Legislature · AB163

Revises provisions governing employment.

Jun 5, 2023 · Enacted

Assemblymember Cecelia González · Sponsored / Assemblymember Venicia Considine · Sponsored / Sen. Dina Neal · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prohibits the Administrator of the Employment Security Division of the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation from denying certain persons unemployment benefits under certain circumstances.

2023-06-05: Signed by the governor The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

prohibiting the Administrator of the Employment Security Division of the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation from denying certain persons unemployment benefits under certain circumstances
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nevada Legislature · AB210

Revises provisions governing public works.

May 30, 2023 · Enacted

Assemblymember Cecelia González · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires a person found by the Labor Commissioner to have willfully and repeatedly failed to pay prevailing wages to a worker to pay certain damages to the affected worker.

2023-05-30: Signed by the governor The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

requiring a person found by the Labor Commissioner to have willfully and repeatedly failed to pay prevailing wages to a worker to pay certain damages to the affected worker
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nevada Legislature · AB303

Removes certain exceptions relating to certain requirements for paid leave.

Apr 10, 2021 · Did not pass

Assemblymember Cecelia González · Sponsored / Assemblymember Natha C. Anderson · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Removes certain exceptions relating to the requirements for an employer in private employment to provide paid leave to each employee of the employer under certain circumstances.

2021-04-10: (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.) The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

removing certain exceptions relating to the requirements for an employer in private employment to provide paid leave to each employee of the employer under certain circumstances
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Assemblymember Daniele Monroe-Moreno

Nevada Assembly, District 1 · D–NV

3 proposals
View proposals from Assemblymember Daniele Monroe-Moreno
Nevada Legislature · AB213

Revises provisions governing public works projects.

Jun 10, 2025 · Vetoed

Assemblymember Daniele Monroe-Moreno · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires the payment of prevailing wages to workers who perform custom fabrication on a public work or for certain performance contracts of local governments or state agencies; requires the payment of prevailing wages to workers who perform custom fabrication on any project financed or otherwise undertaken by the Tahoe-Douglas Visitor's Authority.

2025-06-10: Vetoed by the governor The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

requiring the payment of prevailing wages to workers who perform custom fabrication on a public work or for certain performance contracts of local governments or state agencies; requiring the payment of prevailing wages to workers who perform custom fabrication on any project financed or otherwise undertaken by the Tahoe-Douglas Visitor's Authority
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nevada Legislature · SB231

Makes appropriations to the Interim Finance Committee for allocation to school districts that budget salary increases for certain employees and to the Department of Education for certain personnel costs.

Jun 15, 2023 · Enacted

Sen. Nicole J. Cannizzaro · Sponsored / Sen. Marilyn Dondero Loop · Sponsored / Sen. Roberta Lange · Sponsored / Sen. Skip Daly · Sponsored / Assemblymember Steve Yeager · Sponsored / Assemblymember Sandra Jauregui · Sponsored / Assemblymember Daniele Monroe-Moreno · Sponsored / Assemblymember Elaine H. Marzola · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Appropriates $250 million for school-district salary increases through the specified matching-fund program for the 2023–2025 biennium.

2023-06-15: Signed by the governor The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. 1. There is hereby appropriated from the State General Fund to the Interim Finance Committee the sum of $250,000,000 for allocation to school districts for the support of public schools. 2. Money appropriated by subsection 1 may only be allocated to a school district upon the determination of the Interim Finance Committee that: (a) Sufficient documentation has been submitted to demonstrate that: (1) The school district has budgeted for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 an increase to the salary of teachers and education support professionals employed by the school district from sources other than the appropriation made by subsection 1, which is in addition to any increase in salary for teachers or education support professionals which was planned or bargained for before the effective date of this act; and (2) The increase in salary budgeted pursuant to subparagraph (1) does not replace or supplant any other form of compensation which was provided to teachers or education support professionals of the school district before Fiscal Year 2023-2024 or which was bargained for or planned for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 or any succeeding fiscal year before the effective date of this act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nevada Legislature · AB235

Revises provisions governing public works projects.

Jun 1, 2023 · Vetoed

Assemblymember Daniele Monroe-Moreno · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires the payment of prevailing wages to workers who perform custom fabrication on a public work or for certain performance contracts of local governments or state agencies.

2023-06-01: Vetoed by the governor The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

requiring the payment of prevailing wages to workers who perform custom fabrication on a public work or for certain performance contracts of local governments or state agencies
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Assemblymember Elaine H. Marzola

Nevada Assembly, District 21 · D–NV

1 proposal
View proposals from Assemblymember Elaine H. Marzola
Nevada Legislature · SB231

Makes appropriations to the Interim Finance Committee for allocation to school districts that budget salary increases for certain employees and to the Department of Education for certain personnel costs.

Jun 15, 2023 · Enacted

Sen. Nicole J. Cannizzaro · Sponsored / Sen. Marilyn Dondero Loop · Sponsored / Sen. Roberta Lange · Sponsored / Sen. Skip Daly · Sponsored / Assemblymember Steve Yeager · Sponsored / Assemblymember Sandra Jauregui · Sponsored / Assemblymember Daniele Monroe-Moreno · Sponsored / Assemblymember Elaine H. Marzola · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Appropriates $250 million for school-district salary increases through the specified matching-fund program for the 2023–2025 biennium.

2023-06-15: Signed by the governor The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. 1. There is hereby appropriated from the State General Fund to the Interim Finance Committee the sum of $250,000,000 for allocation to school districts for the support of public schools. 2. Money appropriated by subsection 1 may only be allocated to a school district upon the determination of the Interim Finance Committee that: (a) Sufficient documentation has been submitted to demonstrate that: (1) The school district has budgeted for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 an increase to the salary of teachers and education support professionals employed by the school district from sources other than the appropriation made by subsection 1, which is in addition to any increase in salary for teachers or education support professionals which was planned or bargained for before the effective date of this act; and (2) The increase in salary budgeted pursuant to subparagraph (1) does not replace or supplant any other form of compensation which was provided to teachers or education support professionals of the school district before Fiscal Year 2023-2024 or which was bargained for or planned for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 or any succeeding fiscal year before the effective date of this act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Assemblymember Gregory T. Hafen

Nevada Assembly, District 36 · R–NV

1 proposal
View proposals from Assemblymember Gregory T. Hafen
Nevada Legislature · AB398

Revises provisions governing compensation for certain employees of public schools.

Jun 5, 2025 · Enacted

Assemblymember Steve Yeager · Sponsored / Assemblymember Gregory T. Hafen · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires the Department of Education to award money to school districts to provide compensation in addition to base pay for hard-to-fill positions in public schools; makes an appropriation to the Interim Finance Committee for allocation to the Department to fund compensation in addition to base pay for hard-to-fill positions in public schools.

2025-06-05: Signed by the governor The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

requiring the Department of Education to award money to school districts to provide compensation in addition to base pay for hard-to-fill positions in public schools; making an appropriation to the Interim Finance Committee for allocation to the Department to fund compensation in addition to base pay for hard-to-fill positions in public schools
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Assemblymember Heather Goulding

Nevada Assembly, District 27 · D–NV

1 proposal
View proposals from Assemblymember Heather Goulding
Nevada Legislature · AB301

Revises provisions relating to community development.

Jun 10, 2025 · Enacted

Assemblymember Heather Goulding · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Revises provisions governing the procedure for applying for transferable tax credits for affordable housing and the transfer of such tax credits.

2025-06-10: Signed by the governor The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Nevada’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

revising provisions governing the procedure for applying for transferable tax credits for affordable housing and the transfer of such tax credits
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Assemblymember Howard Watts

Nevada Assembly, District 15 · D–NV

2 proposals
View proposals from Assemblymember Howard Watts
Nevada Legislature · AB124

Revises provisions relating to employment.

Apr 10, 2021 · Did not pass

Assemblymember Howard Watts · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex by taking certain actions relating to the employment opportunities of an employee; prohibits an employer from seeking or taking certain other actions relating to the wage rate history of a prospective employee; requires an employer to disclose the minimum wage rate, wage scale or salary range for a position of employment under certain circumstances.

2021-04-10: (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.) The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

prohibiting employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex by taking certain actions relating to the employment opportunities of an employee; prohibiting an employer from seeking or taking certain other actions relating to the wage rate history of a prospective employee; requiring an employer to disclose the minimum wage rate, wage scale or salary range for a position of employment under certain circumstances
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Nevada Legislature · AB339

Revises provisions relating to wages paid to certain persons who participate in job and day training services.

Apr 13, 2019 · Did not pass

Assemblymember Howard Watts · Sponsored / Sen. James Ohrenschall · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requires the minimum payment that must be paid to certain persons who participate in jobs and day training services to be set by regulation; prohibits the issuance of a certificate to provide jobs and day training services under certain circumstances; requires providers of jobs and day training services to submit certain annual reports to the Labor Commissioner.

2019-04-13: (Pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1, no further action allowed.) The session has adjourned. This is the recorded disposition, not a determination of current enforceability.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Nevada evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

requiring the minimum payment that must be paid to certain persons who participate in jobs and day training services to be set by regulation; prohibiting the issuance of a certificate to provide jobs and day training services under certain circumstances; requiring providers of jobs and day training services to submit certain annual reports to the Labor Commissioner
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Nevada officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Nevada statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.