Nebraska · individual fact

Nebraska income and taxes

Household income, income per person, purchasing power, and Nebraska’s tax structure.

Median household income$76.48K2020–2024 · #28 of 50 · highest first
Per-capita money income$41.75K2020–2024 · #26 of 50 · highest first
Real personal income per person$65.3K2024 · #5 of 50 · highest first

Nebraska over time

Explore Nebraska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Nebraska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Nebraska effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Nebraska change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real personal income per person Nebraska · source units
NebraskaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real personal income per person2024: $65,297$45.49K$56.72K$67.95KNebraska, 2014: $54,141Nebraska, 2015: $56,132Nebraska, 2016: $54,694Nebraska, 2017: $55,285Nebraska, 2018: $54,996Nebraska, 2019: $55,976Nebraska, 2020: $58,746Nebraska, 2021: $63,655Nebraska, 2022: $63,701Nebraska, 2023: $65,780Nebraska, 2024: $65,297201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 40National context · Katrina emergency tax relief enacted · 2005-09-23Katrina tax reliefNational context · Investment tax rates extended and AMT relief enacted · 2006-05-172006 tax extensionsNational context · First step of the federal minimum-wage increase · 2007-07-24Wage floor risesNational context · Economic Stimulus Act authorizes tax rebates · 2008-02-132008 rebatesNational context · Financial crisis intensifies during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Recovery Act expands tax credits and income support · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Federal minimum wage reaches $7.25 · 2009-07-24Wage floor: $7.25National context · Affordable Care Act establishes health tax credits · 2010-03-23Affordable Care ActNational context · Tax extensions and a temporary payroll-tax cut enacted · 2010-12-17Payroll-tax reliefNational context · New investment-income and Medicare taxes take effect · 2013-01-01New health taxesNational context · Employee Social Security tax returns to 6.2% · 2013-01-01Payroll relief endsNational context · American Taxpayer Relief Act resolves tax expirations · 2013-01-02Fiscal-cliff tax dealNational context · IRS recognizes lawful same-sex marriages for federal taxes · 2013-08-29Marriage tax rulesNational context · Marketplace premium tax credits begin · 2014-01-01Health credits beginNational context · PATH Act makes key tax-credit expansions permanent · 2015-12-18PATH tax creditsNational context · 2017 tax law changes individual and business taxes · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · SECURE Act changes retirement saving and withdrawals · 2019-12-20SECURE retirement lawNational context · Families First Act authorizes emergency leave and food aid · 2020-03-18Emergency leave aidNational context · CARES Act expands pandemic income support · 2020-03-27CARES reliefNational context · First pandemic employment report shows job losses · 2020-04-03Pandemic job lossesNational context · Second-round rebates and unemployment relief enacted · 2020-12-27More pandemic reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan expands credits and benefits · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Advance child tax credit payments begin · 2021-07-15Monthly child creditNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic UI endsNational context · Temporary family-credit expansions end for tax year 2022 · 2022-01-01Credit expansions endNational context · Inflation outpaces average hourly pay growth · 2022-07-13Real earnings fallNational context · Inflation Reduction Act changes corporate and energy taxes · 2022-08-16IRA tax changesNational context · Social Security announces an 8.7% cost-of-living increase · 2022-10-13Social Security COLANational context · SECURE 2.0 revises retirement tax rules · 2022-12-29SECURE 2.0National context · SNAP emergency allotments end nationwide · 2023-03-01Emergency food aid endsNational context · Social Security Fairness Act repeals WEP and GPO · 2025-01-05Social Security fairnessNational context · 2025 reconciliation law extends and changes tax provisions · 2025-07-042025 tax lawNational context · Marketplace credit enhancements expire and repayment rules change · 2026-01-01Health credit changesNational context · First filing season under the 2025 tax changes opens · 2026-01-26New deductions filingNebraska · Nebraska issues Order 26-03: Preserving survivor benefits for eligible youth in care · 2026-01-27NE Order 26-03Nebraska · Nebraska approves LB1010: large-load electricity, storage and data-center rules · 2026-04-14Nebraska LB1010 approvalNational context · New child savings accounts become eligible for funding · 2026-07-04Child savings fundingNebraska · Nebraska’s LB1010 large-load, storage-tax and data-center provisions take effect · 2026-07-18Nebraska LB1010 effectiveNebraska · Nebraska issues Order 26-17: Economic-development incentive review and data-center task force · 2026-07-20NE Order 26-17Nebraska · Nebraska issues Order 26-21: Temporary diesel relief and agricultural motor-fuel refund claims · 2026-09-24NE Order 26-21● Nebraska Legislature · 4● U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · 1◆ Governor · 7■ Nebraska agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-09-012026-09-30

12 of 12 reviewed Nebraska actions match · 12 date markers shown. 40 major events shown separately.

Nebraska · 2024: $65,297 · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index. Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Nebraska Real personal income per person · source units
PeriodNebraskaRankU.S. benchmark
2024$65,297#5 of 50$59,195
2023$65,780#6 of 50$58,088
2022$63,701#7 of 50$57,104
2021$63,655#10 of 50$59,365
2020$58,746#15 of 50$56,514
2019$55,976#16 of 50$53,683
2018$54,996#13 of 50$52,242
2017$55,285#9 of 50$51,006
2016$54,694#7 of 50$49,828
2015$56,132#7 of 50$49,396
2014$54,141#6 of 50$47,661
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Nebraska · state comparison

Household resources

Compare the ACS five-year estimates using the same population and dollar period.

Nebraska · 2020–2024$76,475
Nebraska rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$80,734Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Median household income

Median before-tax income received by households; half are above and half below.

2024 dollars. ACS sampling error means nearby ranks may not be statistically distinguishable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $56.45KHigher value · $103.96KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · $76,4752020–2024 · Rank #28 of 50, highest first90% confidence interval: $75,842 – $77,108Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Median household income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Massachusetts$103,96090% CI: 103433–104487
#2Maryland$103,67890% CI: 103081–104275
#3New Jersey$103,55690% CI: 103043–104069
#4Hawaii$100,38990% CI: 99268–101510
#5California$99,12290% CI: 98812–99432
#6New Hampshire$99,03190% CI: 97908–100154
#7Washington$98,14190% CI: 97727–98555
#8Connecticut$95,78190% CI: 95049–96513
#9Colorado$95,47090% CI: 94892–96048
#10Utah$95,16690% CI: 94392–95940
#11Virginia$93,17090% CI: 92712–93628
#12Alaska$92,78890% CI: 91556–94020
#13Minnesota$89,06290% CI: 88653–89471
#14Rhode Island$87,79690% CI: 86587–89005
#15New York$85,97490% CI: 85572–86376
#16Delaware$84,95490% CI: 83703–86205
#17Illinois$83,39090% CI: 83028–83752
#18Oregon$83,01190% CI: 82438–83584
#19Vermont$81,20390% CI: 79864–82542
#20Arizona$79,96490% CI: 79557–80371
#21Texas$78,47690% CI: 78213–78739
#22Nevada$78,26090% CI: 77664–78856
#23Pennsylvania$77,97190% CI: 77629–78313
#24Idaho$77,80090% CI: 77057–78543
#25Wisconsin$77,48590% CI: 77030–77940
#26Georgia$77,35390% CI: 76946–77760
#27North Dakota$76,65790% CI: 75494–77820
#28Nebraska · your comparison$76,47590% CI: 75842–77108
#29Wyoming$76,17690% CI: 75008–77344
#30South Dakota$75,08190% CI: 74193–75969
#31Iowa$75,05990% CI: 74641–75477
#32Maine$74,73390% CI: 73938–75528
#33Florida$74,56890% CI: 74284–74852
#34Kansas$74,27590% CI: 73800–74750
#35Michigan$72,87590% CI: 72582–73168
#36Montana$72,50990% CI: 71748–73270
#37North Carolina$72,38890% CI: 72064–72712
#38Indiana$71,95790% CI: 71605–72309
#39Ohio$71,38990% CI: 71068–71710
#40Missouri$70,70290% CI: 70377–71027
#41Tennessee$69,59590% CI: 69166–70024
#42South Carolina$69,32490% CI: 68754–69894
#43Oklahoma$65,03990% CI: 64600–65478
#44New Mexico$64,05990% CI: 63251–64867
#45Alabama$63,99990% CI: 63600–64398
#46Kentucky$63,72690% CI: 63297–64155
#47Arkansas$60,77390% CI: 60306–61240
#48Louisiana$60,75690% CI: 60348–61164
#49West Virginia$59,60890% CI: 58917–60299
#50Mississippi$56,44790% CI: 55908–56986

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Median household income

$76,4752020–2024 estimate

Median money income received by Nebraska households, expressed in inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Additional household measure

People below the poverty threshold
10.9%
Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.

  • Household income is not take-home pay and does not directly account for taxes, benefits, household size, debt, or regional cost differences.
  • The poverty measure and income estimate are multi-year survey measures, not current economic forecasts.
Nebraska · state comparison

Is income keeping up with prices?

Real income adjusts for price levels and inflation. Disposable income subtracts personal current taxes but does not subtract household living expenses.

Nebraska · 2024$65,297
Nebraska rank#5among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$59,195Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real personal income per person

BEA personal income per person adjusted for regional price parities and the national PCE price index.

Constant 2017 dollars. A BEA measure, distinct from ACS per-capita money income.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Nebraska
Real personal income per person history in Nebraska$44.94K$56.72K$68.5K20142024
2024 · Nebraska: $65,297 · Rank #5 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $59,195 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Nebraska Real personal income per person history
PeriodNebraskaCompare
2014$54,141
2015$56,132
2016$54,694
2017$55,285
2018$54,996
2019$55,976
2020$58,746
2021$63,655
2022$63,701
2023$65,780
2024$65,297

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $48.47KHigher value · $75.5KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · $65,2972024 · Rank #5 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Real personal income per person · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Wyoming$75,501—
#2Connecticut$74,254—
#3Massachusetts$71,629—
#4South Dakota$69,153—
#5Nebraska · your comparison$65,297—
#6North Dakota$65,271—
#7Colorado$65,223—
#8New Hampshire$64,632—
#9Washington$64,421—
#10New York$64,153—
#11New Jersey$63,142—
#12California$63,028—
#13Minnesota$62,039—
#14Virginia$61,914—
#15Maryland$61,111—
#16Illinois$60,333—
#17Alaska$60,272—
#18Iowa$60,144—
#19Montana$59,203—
#20Kansas$59,172—
#21Vermont$58,893—
#22Oklahoma$58,692—
#23Pennsylvania$58,620—
#24Tennessee$58,582—
#25Wisconsin$58,273—
#26Texas$58,219—
#27Missouri$57,850—
#28Maine$57,480—
#29Florida$57,131—
#30Louisiana$56,789—
#31Nevada$56,503—
#32North Carolina$56,310—
#33Ohio$56,232—
#34Rhode Island$55,878—
#35Indiana$55,562—
#36Oregon$55,451—
#37Arkansas$55,219—
#38Delaware$55,185—
#39Utah$55,116—
#40Michigan$53,569—
#41Georgia$52,952—
#42Arizona$52,890—
#43Idaho$52,816—
#44South Carolina$52,463—
#45Kentucky$52,290—
#46Hawaii$52,272—
#47Alabama$52,216—
#48New Mexico$51,121—
#49West Virginia$50,051—
#50Mississippi$48,465—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Nebraska · state comparison

How Nebraska raises taxes

Nebraska's 2026 estimated individual-income-tax schedule begins at 2.46% and tops out at 4.55%; the third and fourth brackets use the same 4.55% rate. Revenue comparisons rank dollars collected, not statutory tax rates or a particular household’s tax burden.

Nebraska · FY2024$2.48B
Nebraska rank#33among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$479.63BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal income-tax collections

Revenue collected under the Census tax classification. Missing item codes in the complete state-level file mean no reported amount.

State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Larger collections reflect population, income, tax bases, and rates; they are not inherently better.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.

Lower value · $0Higher value · $123.1BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Nebraska · $2.48BFY2024 · Rank #33 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Personal income-tax collections · FY2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$123.1B—
#2New York$53.84B—
#3Illinois$22.63B—
#4Massachusetts$22.13B—
#5New Jersey$18.88B—
#6Virginia$17.64B—
#7Pennsylvania$17.08B—
#8North Carolina$16.66B—
#9Georgia$16.02B—
#10Minnesota$13.27B—
#11Michigan$11.56B—
#12Maryland$10.65B—
#13Connecticut$10.03B—
#14Ohio$10.02B—
#15Oregon$9.54B—
#16Wisconsin$9.49B—
#17Indiana$8.1B—
#18Missouri$7.75B—
#19Colorado$7.52B—
#20South Carolina$6.15B—
#21Utah$5.72B—
#22Alabama$5.28B—
#23Kentucky$5.02B—
#24Louisiana$4.88B—
#25Arizona$4.81B—
#26Oklahoma$4.51B—
#27Kansas$4.5B—
#28Iowa$3.76B—
#29Hawaii$3.28B—
#30Idaho$2.89B—
#31Arkansas$2.76B—
#32Delaware$2.53B—
#33Nebraska · your comparison$2.48B—
#34Maine$2.4B—
#35Mississippi$2.33B—
#36West Virginia$2.27B—
#37Montana$2.25B—
#38New Mexico$2.17B—
#39Rhode Island$1.59B—
#40Vermont$1.24B—
#41North Dakota$356.48M—
#42Washington$350.45M—
#43New Hampshire$183.36M—
#44Tennessee$2.12M—
#45Alaska$0—
#45Florida$0—
#45Nevada$0—
#45South Dakota$0—
#45Texas$0—
#45Wyoming$0—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

How federal income taxes work

A marginal rate applies only to taxable income within its band. Moving into a higher bracket does not apply that rate to all your income.

Base standard deduction

$16,100

Tax year 2026 · Single

Marginal versus effective rate

The bracket table applies to ordinary taxable income after deductions, not to gross wages or Census household income.

2026 ordinary taxable-income bands · Single
Marginal rateTaxable income in this band
10%Up to $12,400
12%Over $12,400 through $50,400
22%Over $50,400 through $105,700
24%Over $105,700 through $201,775
32%Over $201,775 through $256,225
35%Over $256,225 through $640,600
37%Over $640,600

Selected filing statuses only. Rates exclude preferential capital-gain rules, credits, alternative minimum tax, payroll taxes and state/local taxes. The base deduction does not include extra amounts for age, blindness or other eligibility. Tax year 2026 returns are generally filed in 2027.

IRS · Tax schedules and deductions ↗

Who pays what share of income taxes?

Compare income groups’ shares of federal individual income tax. These groups divide tax returns by adjusted gross income (AGI), with no overlap.

Tax year 2023 · IRS estimates · Returns excluding dependents. Latest available in this IRS release: 2023. The 2026 tax schedules above describe a different year.

$2.14 trillion total individual income tax153.1 million tax returns
Income groups ranked from lowest to highest AGI · 2023 dollars
Income group Approximate AGI range Share of income Share of income tax Average tax rate
Bottom 50%50.0% of returnsBelow $53,80112.3%3.3%3.7%
50th–75th percentile25.0% of returns$53,801 to under $105,60419.2%10.4%7.7%
75th–90th percentile15.0% of returns$105,604 to under $187,60820.9%15.8%10.6%
90th–95th percentile5.0% of returns$187,608 to under $272,20911.2%11.2%14.2%
95th–99th percentile4.0% of returns$272,209 to under $675,60215.8%20.9%18.7%
Top 1%1.0% of returns$675,602 and above20.6%38.4%26.3%

Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show income shares. Both use a 0–100% scale. Each share column totals approximately 100% after rounding. The bottom group includes zero and negative AGI.

What is included, and how are the groups calculated?

IRS total income tax includes income tax after specified credits, limited to zero, plus net investment income tax and tax on accumulation distributions of trusts. Refundable portions of credits are excluded. This is tax liability, not withholding, refunds received or all government revenue. Payroll, corporate, estate, excise, and state/local taxes are outside this measure. Paying little federal income tax does not mean paying no taxes.

FactVote subtracts adjacent IRS cumulative totals to form the separate groups. For example, the 95th–99th percentile equals the top 5% minus the top 1%. Average rates are then calculated from each group’s tax and AGI, rather than subtracting the published average rates. Historical groups contain different returns over time. Figures are sample estimates and rounded source amounts can introduce small differences.

IRS Statistics of Income, Table 4.1 · Published March 2026 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download IRS source table ↗ · IRS methods and releases ↗

Who pays corporate income taxes?

Compare federal corporate income tax after credits across company-size groups. IRS groups these returns by annual business receipts, not by household income or profit.

Tax year 2022 · Active corporation returns excluding S corporations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and regulated investment companies (RICs). Latest available in this IRS table: 2022.

$448.50B corporate income tax after credits in this table1.56 million estimated returns
Corporate tax by annual business receipts · 2022 dollars
Company-size group Share of returns Share of business receipts Income tax after credits Share of corporate income tax
Under $100,00044.6%0.1%$5.93B1.3%
$100,000–under $1 million32.9%0.6%$2.31B0.5%
$1 million–under $10 million17.6%2.9%$8.78B2.0%
$10 million–under $100 million3.9%5.6%$21.87B4.9%
$100 million–under $1 billion0.8%10.9%$40.78B9.1%
$1 billion and above0.2%80.0%$368.84B82.2%

All six groups are separate. Blue bars show tax shares; gray bars show receipts shares, both on a 0–100% scale. Shares sum to approximately 100% after rounding. The smallest group includes zero receipts and receipts not reported.

How this differs from the individual income-tax breakdown

The individual section groups returns by adjusted gross income. This section groups corporate returns by business receipts; neither the income concepts nor the tax totals are interchangeable. No effective tax rate is calculated by dividing corporate tax by sales.

S corporations generally pass income through to owners and are excluded here, as are REITs and RICs. Their exclusion does not mean their owners pay no tax. This section therefore describes the IRS table’s covered corporations rather than every business or every dollar of corporate-tax revenue. It does not estimate how the economic burden is shared among shareholders, workers and customers.

FactVote combines adjacent IRS size bands and sums published amounts; no suppressed values are used. Figures are sample estimates. Returns may use different accounting periods, and company size and nominal dollar values change over time. Small differences from totals reflect source rounding.

IRS Statistics of Income, Publication 16, Table 3.3 · Latest release September 2025 · Checked 2026-09-14. Download 2022 IRS table ↗ · IRS coverage and methods ↗

The broader federal tax burden

Individual income tax is one part of a household’s federal taxes. Compare income, payroll, corporate and excise taxes as a percentage of each group’s income.

Calendar year 2022 · CBO estimates · Latest available in this release: 2022. These household groups use a different income definition from the IRS tax-return groups above.

Average federal tax rates · Percent of income before means-tested transfers and taxes
Income group Individual income Payroll Corporate Excise Combined rate
Lowest fifth−10.1%9.5%0.8%1.3%1.4%
Second fifth−0.9%8.8%0.8%0.8%9.5%
Middle fifth3.1%8.8%0.9%0.6%13.4%
Fourth fifth6.8%9.3%1.0%0.5%17.6%
Highest fifth16.6%6.1%2.9%0.3%25.9%
All households10.6%7.5%2.1%0.4%20.6%

Combined-rate bars share a fixed −30% to +30% scale, centered at zero. Blue = net tax; teal = net payment to households. Negative individual income tax reflects refundable credits. Components may differ from the combined rate by 0.1–0.2 points because CBO rounds each figure separately.

How this comparison is measured

CBO combines tax records and household survey data. Each rate divides the group’s total tax by its total income; it is not a simple average of individual rates. Income includes earnings, investment income and social insurance benefits, including some noncash benefits. The employer share of payroll taxes is attributed to workers. Corporate-tax allocation reflects modeling assumptions, not directly observed household payments.

The four tax types covered 90% of federal revenue in fiscal 2022. Estate and gift taxes, customs duties and other federal sources are outside this comparison, as are state/local taxes. Households with negative income are excluded from the five individual groups but included in “All households.” Do not average the five group rates to calculate the national rate.

CBO · Published 2026-01-21 · Checked 2026-09-14. Report and data ↗ · Methods and tax allocation ↗

Is after-tax income keeping up with prices?

Real disposable income per person tracks average income available for spending or saving after personal taxes, adjusted for inflation. A rise means average purchasing power increased; it does not mean every household is better off.

Real income per person

$52,849

Jul 2026 · Chained 2017 dollars · Annual rate

Change from prior month

+0.3%

Jun 2026 to Jul 2026 · Not an annualized change

Change from a year earlier

+0.2%

Jul 2025 to Jul 2026

Per personchained 2017 dollars

Hover to inspect; click or tap to keep a reading selected. Use the arrow keys to explore, or Escape to clear.

Purchasing power. chained 2017 dollars. Use left and right arrows to explore observations.023,069.446,138.869,208.2Jan 2020Apr 2023Jul 2026

Scroll the chart sideways to see the full timeline.

Jul 2026Per person: 52,849 chained 2017 dollars
View data: Purchasing power
Purchasing power · chained 2017 dollars
PeriodPer person
Jul 202652,849 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202652,666 chained 2017 dollars
May 202652,517 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202652,402 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202652,624 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202652,694 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202652,941 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202552,610 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202552,667 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202552,684 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202552,865 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202552,829 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202552,740 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202552,529 chained 2017 dollars
May 202552,609 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202553,077 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202552,794 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202552,465 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202552,422 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202452,376 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202452,348 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202452,252 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202452,159 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202452,136 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202452,135 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202452,192 chained 2017 dollars
May 202452,124 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202451,946 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202451,924 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202451,902 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202451,878 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202351,637 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202351,515 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202351,302 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202351,171 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202351,195 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202351,166 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202351,106 chained 2017 dollars
May 202351,085 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202350,936 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202350,861 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202350,594 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202350,353 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202249,403 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202249,210 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202249,165 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202249,043 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202248,912 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202248,660 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202248,071 chained 2017 dollars
May 202248,219 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202248,312 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202248,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202248,607 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202248,616 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202149,845 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202150,093 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202150,258 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202150,266 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202150,857 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202150,982 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202150,671 chained 2017 dollars
May 202150,939 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202152,450 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202161,793 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202150,288 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202154,791 chained 2017 dollars
Dec 202049,374 chained 2017 dollars
Nov 202049,323 chained 2017 dollars
Oct 202049,907 chained 2017 dollars
Sep 202050,099 chained 2017 dollars
Aug 202049,835 chained 2017 dollars
Jul 202051,838 chained 2017 dollars
Jun 202051,388 chained 2017 dollars
May 202051,575 chained 2017 dollars
Apr 202054,304 chained 2017 dollars
Mar 202047,344 chained 2017 dollars
Feb 202047,961 chained 2017 dollars
Jan 202047,800 chained 2017 dollars

Monthly observations are seasonally adjusted and expressed at an annual rate; $52,849 is not one month’s income. BEA’s measure is broader than cash take-home pay and differs from Census money income and CBO household resources elsewhere on this page. Personal taxes include federal, state and local personal taxes; this is not calculated by subtracting the CBO table from Census income.

BEA via FRED · Updated 2026-08-26 · Checked 2026-09-14. Historical estimates may be revised. Series and data ↗ · Inflation adjustment ↗

Income before and after taxes and benefits

Compare average household resources within each income group: starting income, plus means-tested benefits, minus federal taxes. These are accounting comparisons, not predictions of what incomes would be without those programs.

Calendar year 2022 · Average per household · All amounts in 2022 dollars. Gray = before; blue = after. Both bar columns use the same zero-to-$450,000 scale.

Before + means-tested benefits − federal taxes = after · Rounded CBO estimates
Income group Before + Benefits − Taxes After
Lowest fifth$26,200$19,000$400$44,800
Second fifth$59,100$9,600$5,600$63,100
Middle fifth$94,000$5,600$12,600$87,000
Fourth fifth$143,100$3,000$25,100$121,100
Highest fifth$412,600$1,700$106,700$307,600
All households$143,000$7,900$29,400$121,500

“Before” already includes social insurance, including Social Security and Medicare. “Benefits” adds means-tested programs only, including cash and noncash assistance from federal, state and local governments. The tax column covers federal taxes only. CBO uses PCE inflation adjustment; amounts are rounded to the nearest $100, so the displayed equation can differ by $100–$200. Negative-income households appear in the national total, not the five separate groups.

CBO · Latest year in this release: 2022 · Published 2026-01-21. Report and household income data ↗

Tax credits and measured poverty

A deduction reduces taxable income. A credit reduces tax directly; a refundable credit can also result in a payment when the credit exceeds the tax owed. Census estimates how counting these payments changes the number of people below its Supplemental Poverty Measure threshold.

Original-release estimates: These figures use the thresholds in Census’s September 2025 report. Thresholds were corrected in July 2026; these are not revised credit-effect estimates. Read the revision notice ↗

Refundable tax credits · 2024 · Original September 2025 release
Age group Fewer people below the threshold 90% margin of error
All ages6,768,000±462,000
Under 183,704,000±263,000
Ages 18–642,985,000±224,000
Ages 65+79,000±25,000

Bars start at zero and share a fixed 0–7 million people scale. “All ages” includes the three age groups below it. Refundable credits combine EITC and the refundable Child Tax Credit; the CTC-only estimate overlaps and must not be added to the combined estimate or subtracted to infer an EITC-only effect.

The SPM counts taxes, selected noncash assistance and necessary expenses, with thresholds that vary with housing and location. This differs from the official poverty measure based on pretax money income. The 2023 and 2024 counts also use different population controls, so a difference combines demographic changes and methodological updates. No year-to-year effect is calculated here.

Census CPS ASEC · Table B-7 · Checked 2026-09-14. Source table and uncertainty ↗ · Report and data-vintage notice ↗

Understanding Nebraska income

Median, average and per person

The median describes the middle household. Per-capita income is a population average, including children. BEA personal income also includes sources outside Census money income. These measures answer different questions.

Income, taxes and living costs

Before-tax money income is not take-home pay. Disposable personal income subtracts personal current taxes. Real personal income adjusts for prices. A state income-tax rate does not describe sales taxes, local property taxes, federal taxes or a household’s complete tax burden.

Annual and five-year estimates

The Nebraska ACS comparison pools 2020–2024 and expresses income in 2024 dollars. BEA annual history describes individual calendar years. A difference between the two series is not an income change.

Rankings and uncertainty

#1 means the highest measured value, not the best state. Survey ranks use point estimates; nearby values may not be distinguishable after sampling uncertainty. Larger tax collections can simply reflect a larger population or tax base.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about income, wages and tax policy from FactVote’s Nebraska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

73 statements from 14 candidates

2026 Nebraska Governor — General Election

4 candidates with matching statements · 18 statements

Ben Steffen

4 statements

Democratic · Lieutenant Governor · NE

Taxes & tax policy

The things that bring us together are far stronger than what divides us. I believe in freedom, hard work, and personal responsibility. I want a better life for our families. I want low taxes, strong schools, and a bustling economy where we have opportunities to get ahead. I cannot let political elit…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A Different Kind of Leader for Nebraska.

Candidate campaign source

The things that bring us together are far stronger than what divides us. I believe in freedom, hard work, and personal responsibility. I want a better life for our families. I want low taxes, strong schools, and a bustling economy where we have opportunities to get ahead. I cannot let political elites and large tech and media companies continue to divide us. Nebraska can once again rise above the dysfunction. I am a leader with a track record of putting parties aside to get results.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ben Steffen campaign source 1 ↗
View 3 more statements from Ben Steffen
Taxes & tax policy

Joseph McKeeIf she puts in writing that she will not raise property taxes i would think about it.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lynne Walz for Nebraska

Candidate campaign source

Joseph McKeeIf she puts in writing that she will not raise property taxes i would think about it.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ben Steffen campaign source 1 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Property taxes and taxes in general are too high. I will responsibly look at ways to cut taxes while ensuring vital services remain strong and that we can balance our budget. That relief needs to be more targeted so it helps the working families, not just the state’s top earners. I have a proven tra…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A Different Kind of Leader for Nebraska.

Candidate campaign source

Property taxes and taxes in general are too high. I will responsibly look at ways to cut taxes while ensuring vital services remain strong and that we can balance our budget. That relief needs to be more targeted so it helps the working families, not just the state’s top earners. I have a proven track record of producing bipartisan plans to help all Nebraskans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ben Steffen campaign source 1 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Opposed Tax Increases on Farmers and Working Families

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Meet Ben

Candidate campaign source

Opposed Tax Increases on Farmers and Working Families

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Ben Steffen — Meet Ben ↗

Jim Pillen

5 statements

Republican · Governor · NE

Taxes & tax policy

We’ve made good progress in cutting property taxes over the past two years, but we have more work to do. We need to address the outdated TEEOSA school funding formula and make the Cornhusker State more competitive with its neighbors and more attractive to families and businesses who want to stay her…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: January 31, 2025

Government-published candidate material

We’ve made good progress in cutting property taxes over the past two years, but we have more work to do. We need to address the outdated TEEOSA school funding formula and make the Cornhusker State more competitive with its neighbors and more attractive to families and businesses who want to stay here or are thinking about moving here.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jim Pillen — official Nebraska office primary source 9 ↗
View 4 more statements from Jim Pillen
Taxes & tax policy

Property Taxes

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Issues

Candidate campaign source

Property Taxes

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jim Pillen — Issues ↗
Taxes & tax policy

2. Our high property tax rates make Nebraska less economically competitive than our neighbors. Reducing property taxes is essential to attracting new residents, retaining current ones, and encouraging business development – all of which will foster stronger economic growth for Nebraska.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Here’s why I feel so strongly about fixing our broken system

Government-published candidate material

2. Our high property tax rates make Nebraska less economically competitive than our neighbors. Reducing property taxes is essential to attracting new residents, retaining current ones, and encouraging business development – all of which will foster stronger economic growth for Nebraska.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jim Pillen — official Nebraska office primary source 10 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

5. High property taxes discourage people from living in Nebraska and encourage younger people to relocate to other states, harming our population and economic growth. We can’t afford to turn a blind eye to the impact of people who will leave or who won’t move here in the first place.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Here’s why I feel so strongly about fixing our broken system

Government-published candidate material

5. High property taxes discourage people from living in Nebraska and encourage younger people to relocate to other states, harming our population and economic growth. We can’t afford to turn a blind eye to the impact of people who will leave or who won’t move here in the first place.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jim Pillen — official Nebraska office primary source 10 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Not only do we want homegrown companies to stay, but we also want others to come, plant their roots and grow. For that to happen, we must have a strategic tax incentive policy that supports new venture opportunities. I’ve been clear – we can no longer provide tax breaks to companies that are takers,…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Data Center Development & Protecting Nebraska Resources

Government-published candidate material

Not only do we want homegrown companies to stay, but we also want others to come, plant their roots and grow. For that to happen, we must have a strategic tax incentive policy that supports new venture opportunities. I’ve been clear – we can no longer provide tax breaks to companies that are takers, not givers, and to those that don’t share our values.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Jim Pillen — official Nebraska office primary source 8 ↗

Lynne Walz

5 statements

Democratic · Governor · NE

Taxes & tax policy

A Fair Tax System

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lynne's Priorities

Candidate campaign source

A Fair Tax System

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Lynne Walz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 4 more statements from Lynne Walz
Taxes & tax policy

The things that bring us together are far stronger than what divides us. I believe in freedom, hard work, and personal responsibility. I want a better life for our families. I want low taxes, strong schools, and a bustling economy where we have opportunities to get ahead. I cannot let political elit…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Civil rights and individual liberty

Candidate campaign source

The things that bring us together are far stronger than what divides us. I believe in freedom, hard work, and personal responsibility. I want a better life for our families. I want low taxes, strong schools, and a bustling economy where we have opportunities to get ahead. I cannot let political elites and large tech and media companies continue to divide us. Nebraska can once again rise above the dysfunction. I am a leader with a track record of putting parties aside to get results.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Lynne Walz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

As an average Nebraskan, Lynne knows just how hard it can be to make ends meet. She will work with all stakeholders to build an economy that works for everyone – not just big corporations and the wealthy. As Governor, she’ll focus on business development, supporting small family farms, lowering the …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: A Different Kind of Leader for Nebraska.

Candidate campaign source

As an average Nebraskan, Lynne knows just how hard it can be to make ends meet. She will work with all stakeholders to build an economy that works for everyone – not just big corporations and the wealthy. As Governor, she’ll focus on business development, supporting small family farms, lowering the cost of housing and daycare, and cutting taxes – not with handouts or politics, but with practical solutions and Nebraska common sense.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Lynne Walz — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Property taxes and taxes in general are too high. I will responsibly look at ways to cut taxes while ensuring vital services remain strong and that we can balance our budget. That relief needs to be more targeted so it helps the working families, not just the state’s top earners. I have a proven tra…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, and government spending

Candidate campaign source

Property taxes and taxes in general are too high. I will responsibly look at ways to cut taxes while ensuring vital services remain strong and that we can balance our budget. That relief needs to be more targeted so it helps the working families, not just the state’s top earners. I have a proven track record of producing bipartisan plans to help all Nebraskans.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Lynne Walz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Joseph McKeeIf she puts in writing that she will not raise property taxes i would think about it.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Lynne Walz for Nebraska

Candidate campaign source

Joseph McKeeIf she puts in writing that she will not raise property taxes i would think about it.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Lynne Walz campaign source 1 ↗

Rick Beard

4 statements

Legal Marijuana NOW · Governor · NE

Income & wages

We need an air horn and a VETO stamp to protect our votes from getting changed to policy we didn't vote for. They want to lower the minimum wage of our 14-16 year old child workforce from $15 an hour to $13.50......Wow......Can 14 year-olds vote for or negotiate their employee rights?? They killed i…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections

Candidate campaign source

We need an air horn and a VETO stamp to protect our votes from getting changed to policy we didn't vote for. They want to lower the minimum wage of our 14-16 year old child workforce from $15 an hour to $13.50......Wow......Can 14 year-olds vote for or negotiate their employee rights?? They killed initiative 436, our voter approved sick leave increases for young workers, seasonal, and temporary workers, while removing their rights to sue for employer violations. It's unbelievable. They block our medical cannabis, dilute our voter approved minimum wage increases, and drastically delay our Medicaid expansion.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rick Beard — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 3 more statements from Rick Beard
Taxes & tax policy

Our property taxes are out of control with no relief in sight. If we estimate future Nebraska cannabis sales, calculating population differences to Colorado, Nebraska could generate $300,000,000 in yearly state cannabis revenue and receive around $93,000,000 in tax revenue. We'll fix the roads and f…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, and government spending

Candidate campaign source

Our property taxes are out of control with no relief in sight. If we estimate future Nebraska cannabis sales, calculating population differences to Colorado, Nebraska could generate $300,000,000 in yearly state cannabis revenue and receive around $93,000,000 in tax revenue. We'll fix the roads and fund our schools to stop these higher-than-Cali property taxes. Other politicians always talk about bringing new industry to Nebraska, we will actually do it. Our state is in a serious financial crisis and can not afford to dismiss businesses that create massive new revenue for Nebraska.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rick Beard — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

Cannabis legalization with taxation is how we bring Nebraska out of the red and into the green. With Nebraska's cannabis money going to surrounding states, our legislature keeps us a black market state without regulation, testing, or taxation. This doesn't give anyone medicinal benefits or access to…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Cannabis and criminal justice policy

Candidate campaign source

Cannabis legalization with taxation is how we bring Nebraska out of the red and into the green. With Nebraska's cannabis money going to surrounding states, our legislature keeps us a black market state without regulation, testing, or taxation. This doesn't give anyone medicinal benefits or access to medical grade, regulated, whole plant cannabis. Here's some things my proposed legislation would provide........

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rick Beard — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Taxes & tax policy

PROPERTY TAX RELIEF- My plan creates $300,000,000+ annually in new revenue for the state. This can fix all our budget problems and lower your property taxes forever in 2-3 years.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Economy, taxes, and government spending

Candidate campaign source

PROPERTY TAX RELIEF- My plan creates $300,000,000+ annually in new revenue for the state. This can fix all our budget problems and lower your property taxes forever in 2-3 years.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Rick Beard — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗

2026 Nebraska State Treasurer — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Joey Spellerberg

2 statements

Republican · State Treasurer · NE

Taxes & tax policy

INVEST NEBRASKAN’S TAX DOLLARS RESPONSIBLY.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: INVEST NEBRASKAN’S TAX DOLLARS RESPONSIBLY.

Candidate campaign source

INVEST NEBRASKAN’S TAX DOLLARS RESPONSIBLY.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Joey Spellerberg — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
View 1 more statement from Joey Spellerberg
Taxes & tax policy

Create tax-advantaged first-time homebuyer savings accounts at Nebraska banks and credit unions.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Current Treasurer Initiatives

Government-published candidate material

Create tax-advantaged first-time homebuyer savings accounts at Nebraska banks and credit unions.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 23, 2026

Joey Spellerberg — official Nebraska office primary source 14 ↗

2026 Nebraska U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific income, wages and tax policy terms in retained, attributed source text from published Nebraska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Nebraska incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Nebraska legislators and Nebraska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Nebraska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

5 matching sponsorships or proposals · 5 Nebraska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Jane Raybould

Nebraska Senate, District 28 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Jane Raybould
Nebraska Legislature · LB 258

Change provisions relating to the minimum wage under the Wage and Hour Act

Feb 9, 2026 · Enacted

Jane Raybould · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LB 258 replaces the post-2026 general minimum-wage inflation adjustment with annual increases of 1.75% beginning January 1, 2027. It permits a $13.50 youth wage for non-emancipated employees ages 14–15, rising 1.5% on January 1, 2030 and every fifth year afterward. For qualifying new employees ages 16–19, the training wage is $13.50 through 2026 and rises 1.5% annually from 2027; youth and training increases are rounded to the nearest cent. Seasonal and migrant workers and emancipated minors are excluded from the training wage. Its initial 90-day period may be extended another 90 days for approved training, and training wages may cover no more than one-fourth of employer-paid hours. Existing-worker displacement prohibitions remain. The existing $15 general minimum for 2026 was not created by this bill. These are wage rules, not a measured household-income change.

Approved by Governor on 2026-02-09. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

Census household money income is measured before taxes and includes wages and specified cash benefits. Minimum-wage provisions concern earnings; tax credits and in-kind benefits are not themselves increases in this statistic. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. Section 48-1203, Revised Statutes Cumulative Supplement, 2024, is amended to read: 48-1203 (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section and section 48-1203.01, every employer shall pay to each of his or her employees a minimum wage of: (a) Nine dollars per hour through December 31, 2022; (b) Ten dollars and fifty cents per hour on and after January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023; (c) Twelve dollars per hour on and after January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024; (d) Thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour on and after January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025; and (e) Fifteen dollars per hour on and after January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026. (2) The minimum wage established in subdivision (1)(e) of this section shall be increased on January 1, 2027, and on January 1 of successive years, by one and three-quarters percent . No later than October 15 of each year, commencing October 15, 2026, the Nebraska Department of Labor shall calculate and publish the minimum wage rate that will take effect the following January 1. (3) For persons compensated by way of gratuities such as waitresses, waiters, hotel bellhops, porters, and shoeshine persons, the employer shall pay wages at the minimum rate of two dollars and thirteen cents per hour, plus all gratuities given to them for services rendered. The sum of wages and gratuities received by each person compensated by way of gratuities shall equal or exceed the applicable minimum wage rate provided in subsection (1) or (2) of this section. In determining whether or not the individual is compensated by way of gratuities, the burden of proof shall be upon the employer. (4) Any employer employing student-learners as part of a bona fide vocational training program shall pay such student-learners' wages at a rate of at least seventy-five percent of the minimum wage rate which would otherwise be applicable under this section. (5)(a) An employer may pay a youth minimum wage of thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour to an employee who: (i) Is at least fourteen years of age but younger than sixteen years of age; and (ii) Is not an emancipated minor. (b) Beginning on January 1, 2030, and on January 1 of every fifth year thereafter, the youth minimum wage shall increase by one and one-half percent, rounded to the nearest cent. Sec. 2. Section 48-1203.01, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, is amended to read: 48-1203.01 (1) An employer may pay a new employee who is at least sixteen years of age but younger than twenty years of age and who is not a seasonal or migrant worker or an emancipated minor a training wage rate as described in subsection (2) of this section for ninety days from the date the new employee was hired. An employer may pay such new employee the training wage rate for an additional ninety-day period while the new employee is participating in on-the-job training which (a) requires technical, personal, or other skills which are necessary for his or her employment and (b) is approved by the Commissioner of Labor. No more than one-fourth of the total hours paid by the employer shall be at the training wage rate. (2) For the purposes of this section, the training wage rate shall be: (a) Thirteen dollars and fifty cents per hour through December 31, 2026; and (b) Beginning on January 1, 2027, and on January 1 of each year thereafter, the training wage rate shall increase by one and one-half percent, rounded to the nearest cent. (3) An employer shall not pay the training wage rate if the hours of any other employee are reduced or if any other employee is laid off and the hours or position to be filled by the new employee is substantially similar to the hours or position of such other employee. An employer shall not dismiss or reduce the hours of any employee with the intention of replacing such employee or his or her hours with a new employee receiving the training wage rate.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Megan Hunt

Nebraska Senate, District 8 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Megan Hunt
Nebraska Legislature · LB 275

Require the Department of Health and Human Services to screen state wards for social security benefit eligibility

Jun 4, 2025 · Enacted

Megan Hunt · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The reviewed provision of LB 275 requires DHHS to screen each child entering its charge for Social Security eligibility within 60 days, apply when a child may qualify, and appeal a denial when necessary and in the child’s best interest. DHHS must give the child, guardian ad litem and parents written notices within ten calendar days of notification of each specified determination, approval or payee appointment, including the relevant payee and appeal information. This connection concerns OASDI child benefits; it does not count SSI as OASDI or establish completed applications or benefit awards.

Approved by Governor on 2025-06-04. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The fact counts OASDI retirement, survivor and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Screening children for qualifying OASDI benefits concerns entry into that program; broader Social Security language is connected only for its OASDI component. SSI, Medicare, tax credits and Social Security number issuance are separate matters. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Nebraska residents receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(3)(a) The department shall screen each child under its charge for social security benefit eligibility within sixty days after the date the child enters its charge. (b)(i) If the department determines that a child may be eligible for social security benefits, it shall submit an application for such benefits on behalf of the child and, if necessary and in the child's best interest, appeal a denied application. (ii) The department shall provide written notice to the child, using age- appropriate language, the child's guardian ad litem, and the child's parents, of all benefit eligibility determinations from the Social Security Administration, including benefit approval, denial, and appeal outcomes, within ten calendar days after the date the department is notified of such eligibility determination. (iii) If the child is approved to receive social security benefits, within ten calendar days after the date the department is notified of the approval, the department shall provide written notice to the child, using age-appropriate language, the child's guardian ad litem, and the child's parents, that adults known to the child may apply to be the child's representative payee for the purposes of receiving social security benefit payments. (iv) If the department is appointed to serve as the child's representative payee, within ten calendar days after the date the department is notified of such appointment, the department shall provide written notice to the child, using age-appropriate language, the child's guardian ad litem, and the child's parents, of such appointment, the child's and the child's parents' rights to appeal the appointment, and the deadline for such appeals.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Myron Dorn

Nebraska Senate, District 30 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Myron Dorn
Nebraska Legislature · LB 562

Adopt the E-15 Access Standard Act and change provisions of the Beginning Farmer Tax Credit Act, the Nebraska Higher Blend Tax Credit Act, the Nebraska Investment Finance Authority Act, and the Nebraska Pure Food Act

Jun 1, 2023 · Enacted

Myron Dorn · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

LB 562 requires retail fuel sites newly built or replacing more than 80% of storage/dispensing infrastructure from January 1, 2024 to offer E-15 at at least half of qualifying dispensers. Other sites face a one-dispenser requirement from 2028 only if the statewide 2027 ethanol blend rate is below 14%, with compatibility and specified old-tank exceptions. The small-site exception requires a sworn statement and either one qualifying dispenser or average annual gasoline sales of 300,000 gallons or less during 2021–2023. Temporary infrastructure work is excused; the governor may temporarily suspend the standard for inadequate E-15 supply or price-related economic hardship. This concerns retail availability, not proof of compliance, a triggered future requirement or a change in the Midwest regular-gasoline price.

Approved by Governor on 2023-06-01. Provisions/portions of LB740 amended into LB562 by AM1563. Provisions/portions of LB116 amended into LB562 by AM1554. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.

Why this record is included

The price is EIA’s 15-state Midwest regular-gasoline series, including Nebraska, rather than a Nebraska statewide estimate. E15 rules concern related retail fuel supply; E15 is not assumed to be the specific grade sampled in the regular-price series. Availability rules do not establish production, compliance, a pump-price change or causation. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Midwest regular gasoline price. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Sec. 3. For purposes of the E-15 Access Standard Act, unless the context otherwise requires: (1) Department means the Department of Agriculture; (2) Director means the Director of Agriculture; (3) E-15 access standard means the requirements described in subsections (1) and (2) of section 4 of this act; (4) E-15 gasoline means a classification of ethanol blended gasoline formulated with a percentage of more than ten percent but no more than fifteen percent by volume of ethanol; (5) Ethanol has the same meaning as agricultural ethyl alcohol as defined in section 66-482; (6) Motor fuel means a substance or combination of substances which is intended to be or is capable of being used for the purpose of operating an internal combustion engine and is kept for sale or sold for that purpose; (7) Motor fuel dispenser means equipment that is the part of motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure that includes mechanical or electrical systems that operate a motor fuel pump dispensing motor fuel from a motor fuel storage tank to the end point of the equipment's nozzle; (8) Motor fuel pump means the part of motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure that is a meter or similar commercial weighing and measuring device used to measure and dispense motor fuel originating from a motor fuel storage tank, on a retail basis; (9)(a) Motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure means equipment used to: (i) Store and dispense motor fuel; or (ii) Store, blend, and dispense motor fuel. (b) Motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, a motor fuel storage tank, motor fuel pump, motor fuel dispenser, and associated pipes, hoses, nozzles, tubes, lines, fittings, valves, filters, seals, and covers. Motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure does not include signage not located on the motor fuel dispenser or motor fuel pump; (10) Motor fuel storage tank means the part of motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure that includes an aboveground or belowground container constituting a fixture used to store an accumulation of motor fuel; (11) Nonqualifying motor fuel dispenser means: (a) A dispenser that exclusively dispenses any of the following: (i) Aviation fuel; (ii) Diesel fuel; (iii) Kerosene; or (iv) Diesel exhaust fluid; (b) A dispenser that is part of a tank vehicle as defined in section 60-4,131 that is not used to dispense motor fuel on the premises of the retail motor fuel site; or (c) A dispenser that is part of a commercial marina; (12) Qualifying motor fuel dispenser means a motor fuel dispenser that is capable of dispensing motor fuel at all times that it is in operation. The term does not include nonqualifying motor fuel dispensers; (13) Retail dealer means a person engaged in the business of storing and dispensing motor fuel from a motor fuel pump for sale on a retail basis; and (14) Retail motor fuel site means a geographic location in this state where a retail dealer sells and dispenses motor fuel on a retail basis. Sec. 4. (1) Beginning January 1, 2024, if a retail dealer constructs a new retail motor fuel site or replaces more than eighty percent of the motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure located at an existing retail motor fuel site, the retail dealer shall advertise for sale and sell E-15 gasoline from at least fifty percent of all qualifying motor fuel dispensers located at such retail motor fuel site unless the retail dealer has filed a statement with the department under section 8 of this act in which the retail dealer swears or affirms that the retail motor fuel site qualifies as a small retail motor fuel site. (2) If the statewide ethanol blend rate for 2027 is below fourteen percent as determined pursuant to section 9 of this act and the retail motor fuel site is not a retail motor fuel site described in subsection (1) of this section, then beginning January 1, 2028, the retail dealer shall advertise for sale and sell E-15 gasoline from at least one qualifying motor fuel dispenser located at such retail motor fuel site unless: (a) A waiver has been issued under section 6 of this act because the motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure located at the retail motor fuel site is not compatible with the use of E-15 gasoline; (b) The retail motor fuel site is exempt under section 7 of this act because all of the motor fuel storage tanks located at such site are listed with the State Fire Marshal as described in section 7 of this act; or (c) The retail dealer has filed a statement with the department under section 8 of this act in which the retail dealer swears or affirms that the retail motor fuel site qualifies as a small retail motor fuel site. (3) A retail dealer owning or operating a retail motor fuel site is not prohibited from advertising for sale and selling motor fuel from any number of nonqualifying motor fuel dispensers. (4) It is not a violation of this section if a retail dealer is out of compliance with this section while (a) temporarily maintaining, repairing, or reconditioning motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure or (b) temporarily installing, expanding, replacing, or converting motor fuel storage and dispensing infrastructure. The department may require that a retail dealer notify the department in advance of such actions, and the department may inspect the retail motor fuel site to determine if a violation occurred. Sec. 5. The Governor may issue or renew an executive order that temporarily suspends the E-15 access standard if there is an inadequate supply of E-15 gasoline or the market price of E-15 gasoline may cause consumers to suffer economic hardship. […] Sec. 8. (1) The E-15 access standard shall not apply to a retail motor fuel site if the retail dealer provides a statement to the Department of Agriculture in which the retail dealer swears or affirms that the retail motor fuel site qualifies under this section as a small retail motor fuel site. A retail dealer may include multiple retail motor fuel sites in one statement. (2) For purposes of this section, a retail motor fuel site shall qualify as a small retail motor fuel site if: (a) The retail motor fuel site has only one qualifying motor fuel dispenser; or (b) The retail motor fuel site's average annual gasoline gallonage was three hundred thousand gallons or less for the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2021, and ending on December 31, 2023.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Pete Ricketts

U.S. Senate, Nebraska · R–NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Pete Ricketts
U.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · S 3968

Housing for America’s Middle Class Act of 2026

Mar 3, 2026 · In Congress

Sen. Pete Ricketts · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S 3968 would require GAO to study and report to Congress within one year after enactment on affordability obstacles for households above 80% and no more than 120% of area median family income, adjusted for family size, recommend a workforce-housing definition, and examine possible program changes if additional funding were available. This is a proposed study of broader housing affordability, including the rental component, not expanded eligibility, appropriated aid or an observed rent reduction.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and estimated tenant-paid utilities and fuel. Rental utility-payment duties and notice-to-vacate rules concern tenancy and housing costs without establishing a change in the statewide median. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

2.GAO study on workforce housing (a)In generalNot later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study and submit to the Congress a report that— (1)identifies obstacles middle-income households face when looking to secure affordable housing; (2)identifies geographic areas where housing is the most unaffordable and unavailable for middle-income households; (3)includes a list of Federal housing programs, including Federal tax credits, grants, and loan programs, that are not available to middle-income households due to their income status, including Federal housing programs designed to promote affordability; (4)recommends income and other parameters to establish a clear and consistent Federal definition for the term workforce housing for use when describing the segment of housing that could be made available to such middle-income households in Federal housing programs if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available; and (5)analyzes how to modify or newly develop new Federal housing programs and incentives to include workforce housing if funding commensurate with the additional eligibility were to be made available. (b) Middle-Income household defined In this section, the term middle-income household means a household with an income above 80 percent but that does not exceed 120 percent of the median family income of the area, as determined by the Secretary with adjustments for smaller and larger families.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Tom Brandt

Nebraska Senate, District 32 · –NE

1 proposal
View proposals from Tom Brandt
Nebraska Legislature · LB 1010

Large-load electricity standards, storage regulation and tax rules, and data-center reporting

Apr 14, 2026 · Approved April 14, 2026; changes effective July 18, 2026

Tom Brandt · Sponsored

Reviewed complete enacted law

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1010 on April 14, 2026. Senator Tom Brandt is its recorded primary introducer. The official history posted the approval entry on April 17 but expressly says approval occurred April 14; the enacted heading agrees. LB1010’s changes became effective July 18, as documented by the reviewed codified sections. Approval, effectiveness and implementation are distinct. The new Large Load Customer Regulation Act applies to a retail customer requesting a new or expanded interconnection whose total load at one site would exceed 20 megawatts. Exactly 20 MW does not meet that threshold. This differs from both the data-center definition’s peak demand of at least 10 MW and LB1261’s protection for generation serving new industrial load greater than 1,000 MW. Public power suppliers must establish interconnection standards including protected disclosure of competing requests, disclosure of onsite backup generation, site control and financial commitments. Initial studies require the greater of $50,000 or $1,000 per MW; additional capacity requests after the study require an additional fee based on the new request. Studies must be completed within one year after the fee is received. Suppliers may negotiate rates and operating standards that allocate costs and mitigate resource and financial risks to other customers, and must develop demand-response and emergency curtailment or backup-generation procedures. These powers do not verify any actual rate reduction. Qualifying onsite backup generation must be at least 1 MW and satisfy one of two stated conditions: inability to operate parallel with the grid for more than one-tenth of a second, or continuous parallel operation that is non-exporting and meets applicable interconnection requirements. The enacted definition does not require backup capable of serving 50% of onsite demand. The law adds storage to district eminent-domain scope and cooperative powers, and defines energy storage and associated renewable-facility storage. Associated storage must be on the renewable facility’s premises, primarily store its production, and keep aggregate output within that facility’s nameplate capacity. Reactive-power-only equipment and equipment solely providing electric energy for vehicles are excluded from the storage definition. Private storage requires Power Review Board approval before construction or acquisition, evidence of a contract for all energy and capacity maintained throughout operational life, the specified supplier consents and a joint transmission development agreement. The agreement governs construction, ownership, operation and maintenance, and private construction of needed improvements is at the private supplier’s cost. The law does not force a utility into a joint project or authorize private retail sales, distribution facilities or eminent domain. The storage-protection subsection retains the printed phrase “associated energy resource”; its relationship to the separately defined term remains a clarification question. Storage is added to applicable military-proximity certifications, termination reporting and enforcement. The military-equipment rules retain compliance exemptions and a Board-preapproval exception with stated findings. Terminating an approved project requires a reasons filing within 30 days; the Board’s hearing is advisory and does not approve or deny termination. These provisions do not eliminate contract-breach claims or establish a new criminal offense. A data center under the amended electricity section must meet the stated digital-service and equipment conditions and have peak demand of at least 10 MW. Suppliers may require fair and reasonable infrastructure-cost payments or terms protecting other retail customers, after a load study. Planned facilities must notify their local supplier and meet its interconnection requirements. Data-center owners or operators must report annually by September 30 to the Department of Water, Energy, and Environment and the Legislature’s Natural Resources Committee. The report covers ownership, size, location, electricity demand, water use, tax exemptions, incentive payments, efficiency and conservation measures, renewable-energy commitments and service life. They must bear decommissioning costs and enter community benefit agreements with affected communities. The existing crypto-operation website-reporting and interruption provisions are not blanket data-center requirements. An energy storage resource with nameplate capacity of at least 100 kW is subject to the annual $3,518-per-MW nameplate capacity tax on commissioned capacity, with the stated public-ownership/operation and customer-generator exemptions. The source measures alternating-current capacity in MW, not stored energy in MWh. Depreciable storage personal property subject to this tax is exempt from the depreciable-personal-property tax. This is not an exemption for every tax or every property associated with a storage project. Storage enters the existing tax reporting, proration, payment, penalty and county-remittance framework. Its presence or supporting infrastructure cannot be a factor in valuing or classifying underlying or adjacent real property under the stated section. Receipts are nonrestricted funds for the first five years after commissioning; that status does not waive the tax for five years. The county treasurer distributes 5% of these receipts to the community-college area where the storage resource is located and the remainder to eligible local taxing entities using the statutory levy fractions. The 5% rate already applied to qualifying renewable facilities; LB1010 extends it to storage. The law retains the prohibition on Department of Revenue retention for General Fund allocation. It does not verify actual collections, college spending or a state-debt effect. The February fiscal note addresses the introduced storage bill. The March revision addresses AM2422 and AM2387 and forecasts zero state-agency revenue and expenditure in its four-year table, while explicitly leaving the amount and timing of local taxing-district revenue effects uncertain. Power Review Board cost estimates and the State Electrical Division’s assessment concern their own agency scope. These are estimates, not proof of no local impact or actual spending; final enacted numbering and provisions control over the earlier note’s section descriptions. The current official 13-518 text also correlates LB1114 changes operative April 17, and 77-202 combines LB1010 with LB1114 and LB901 changes stated to become operative January 1, 2027. This review attributes only the storage addition verified in LB1010; it does not treat every consolidated-page difference or future-operative change as LB1010 policy already in force. The complete correlated acts and applicable historical versions still require separate review. The complete enacted LB1010 does not expressly impose a blanket ban on data-center incentives. Its reporting provisions require disclosure of exemptions and incentive payments. This does not resolve the separately retained Order26-17 announcement-versus-signed-original discrepancy, or prove an application was approved, denied or paid. The law changes storage personal-property exemption/nameplate excise-tax treatment and requires data-center tax-exemption/incentive reporting. It does not change household income-tax rates or end all data-center incentives.

Complete enacted provisions and July 18 effective dates verified. Approval posted April 17 expressly records April 14 approval. Implementation and correlated-law review remain separate.

Why this record is included

The law changes storage personal-property exemption/nameplate excise-tax treatment and requires data-center tax-exemption/incentive reporting. It does not change household income-tax rates or end all data-center incentives.

Retained Nebraska evidence context: energy · reviewed policy context · income-taxes · reviewed policy context · education · reviewed policy context · deficit-debt-interest · reviewed policy context · cpi · reviewed policy context · real-gdp · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Governor Jim Pillen approved LB1010 on April 14, 2026. Senator Tom Brandt is its recorded primary introducer. The official history posted the approval entry on April 17 but expressly says approval occurred April 14; the enacted heading agrees. LB1010’s changes became effective July 18, as documented by the reviewed codified sections. Approval, effectiveness and implementation are distinct.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Nebraska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Nebraska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.