Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.
Uninsured rate · all ages7.1%2024 · #26 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 658.4%2024 · #27 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6577.1%2024 · #7 of 50 · highest first
Nebraska over time
Explore Nebraska readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Nebraska officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Nebraska effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Nebraska change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Uninsured rate · all ages Nebraska · source units
NebraskaPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
19 of 19 reviewed Nebraska actions match · 16 date markers shown. 37 major events shown separately.
Nebraska · 2024: 7.1% · Rank #26 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Nebraska · state comparison
Who has health coverage?
Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.
Nebraska · 20247.1%
Nebraska rank#26among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Uninsured rate · all ages
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.
ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Nebraska
2024 · Nebraska: 7.1% · Rank #26 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Nebraska Uninsured rate · all ages history
Period
Nebraska
Compare
2014
9.7%
2015
8.2%
2016
8.6%
2017
8.3%
2018
8.3%
2019
8.3%
2020
Not available
2021
7.1%
2022
6.7%
2023
6.1%
2024
7.1%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · 7.1%2024 · Rank #26 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
16.7%
—
#2
Georgia
12%
—
#3
Oklahoma
11.5%
—
#4
Nevada
11.4%
—
#5
Alaska
11%
—
#6
Florida
10.9%
—
#7
Arizona
10.3%
—
#7
Wyoming
10.3%
—
#9
New Mexico
10.1%
—
#10
Mississippi
9.7%
—
#10
Tennessee
9.7%
—
#12
Arkansas
9.4%
—
#13
Idaho
9.2%
—
#14
South Carolina
9%
—
#15
Montana
8.8%
—
#16
North Carolina
8.6%
—
#17
Kansas
8.5%
—
#18
Utah
8.3%
—
#19
Alabama
8.2%
—
#20
South Dakota
8.1%
—
#21
Colorado
7.9%
—
#22
Louisiana
7.7%
—
#22
Missouri
7.7%
—
#22
New Jersey
7.7%
—
#25
Indiana
7.5%
—
#26
Nebraska · your comparison
7.1%
—
#27
Delaware
6.9%
—
#27
Illinois
6.9%
—
#27
Virginia
6.9%
—
#30
Kentucky
6.8%
—
#31
Ohio
6.7%
—
#32
Washington
6.5%
—
#33
Maryland
6.3%
—
#34
North Dakota
6.1%
—
#35
California
5.9%
—
#36
Connecticut
5.8%
—
#36
Pennsylvania
5.8%
—
#36
West Virginia
5.8%
—
#39
Maine
5.5%
—
#40
Iowa
5.4%
—
#41
Wisconsin
5.3%
—
#42
Oregon
5.2%
—
#43
Michigan
5.1%
—
#43
Minnesota
5.1%
—
#45
New York
5%
—
#46
Rhode Island
4.6%
—
#47
New Hampshire
4.5%
—
#48
Vermont
4.2%
—
#49
Hawaii
3.5%
—
#50
Massachusetts
2.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Nebraska’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.
This excludes people age 65 and older and is a annual survey estimate rather than a current enrollment count.
Insurance status does not measure affordability, provider availability, coverage adequacy, or quality of care.
State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Nebraska with every state.
Nebraska · 2020$10,514
Nebraska rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal healthcare spending per resident
Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.
2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Nebraska
2020 · Nebraska: $10,514 · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Nebraska Personal healthcare spending per resident history
Period
Nebraska
Compare
2014
$8,175
2015
$8,579
2016
$8,943
2017
$9,189
2018
$9,492
2019
$9,917
2020
$10,514
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · $10,5142020 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$14,007
—
#2
Alaska
$13,642
—
#3
Massachusetts
$13,319
—
#4
Delaware
$12,899
—
#5
West Virginia
$12,769
—
#6
Vermont
$12,756
—
#7
South Dakota
$12,495
—
#8
Connecticut
$12,489
—
#9
Maine
$12,077
—
#10
New Jersey
$11,868
—
#11
New Hampshire
$11,793
—
#12
Rhode Island
$11,694
—
#13
Pennsylvania
$11,603
—
#14
North Dakota
$11,301
—
#15
Wyoming
$10,989
—
#16
Minnesota
$10,846
—
#17
Maryland
$10,839
—
#18
Indiana
$10,517
—
#19
Louisiana
$10,515
—
#20
Nebraska · your comparison
$10,514
—
#21
Ohio
$10,478
—
#22
California
$10,299
—
#23
Hawaii
$10,291
—
#24
Kentucky
$10,257
—
#25
Montana
$10,212
—
#26
Illinois
$10,190
—
#27
Oregon
$10,071
—
#28
Wisconsin
$9,982
—
#29
Missouri
$9,921
—
#30
Michigan
$9,897
—
#31
Florida
$9,865
—
#32
Iowa
$9,789
—
#33
Oklahoma
$9,444
—
#34
Kansas
$9,408
—
#35
Mississippi
$9,394
—
#36
Arkansas
$9,338
—
#37
Tennessee
$9,336
—
#38
Alabama
$9,280
—
#39
Washington
$9,265
—
#40
Virginia
$9,195
—
#41
North Carolina
$8,917
—
#42
New Mexico
$8,902
—
#43
South Carolina
$8,766
—
#44
Georgia
$8,758
—
#45
Arizona
$8,756
—
#46
Colorado
$8,583
—
#47
Texas
$8,406
—
#48
Nevada
$8,348
—
#49
Idaho
$8,148
—
#50
Utah
$7,522
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.
Nebraska · 202278.3 years
Nebraska rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Life expectancy at birth
FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Nebraska population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.
The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Nebraska
2022 · Nebraska: 78.3 years · Rank #14 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Nebraska Life expectancy at birth history
Period
Nebraska
Compare
2018
79.1 years
2019
79.2 years
2020
77.7 years
2021
77.8 years
2022
78.3 years
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · 78.3 years2022 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
80 years
—
#2
Massachusetts
79.8 years
—
#3
New Jersey
79.6 years
—
#4
New York
79.5 years
—
#5
Connecticut
79.4 years
—
#6
California
79.3 years
—
#6
Minnesota
79.3 years
—
#8
Rhode Island
79.2 years
—
#9
Utah
79 years
—
#10
New Hampshire
78.7 years
—
#11
Colorado
78.5 years
—
#12
Idaho
78.4 years
—
#12
Washington
78.4 years
—
#14
Nebraska · your comparison
78.3 years
—
#14
Vermont
78.3 years
—
#16
Wisconsin
78.1 years
—
#17
Florida
77.9 years
—
#17
Iowa
77.9 years
—
#17
North Dakota
77.9 years
—
#20
Maryland
77.8 years
—
#21
Oregon
77.7 years
—
#22
Illinois
77.5 years
—
#22
Virginia
77.5 years
—
#24
Montana
77.3 years
—
#24
Pennsylvania
77.3 years
—
#24
South Dakota
77.3 years
—
#27
Texas
77.1 years
—
#28
Michigan
76.8 years
—
#28
Wyoming
76.8 years
—
#30
Arizona
76.7 years
—
#31
Maine
76.6 years
—
#32
Delaware
76.5 years
—
#32
Kansas
76.5 years
—
#34
Nevada
76.4 years
—
#35
Georgia
75.9 years
—
#35
North Carolina
75.9 years
—
#37
Alaska
75.8 years
—
#38
Ohio
75.6 years
—
#39
Indiana
75.4 years
—
#40
Missouri
75.2 years
—
#41
South Carolina
75.1 years
—
#42
New Mexico
74.5 years
—
#43
Arkansas
73.9 years
—
#44
Alabama
73.8 years
—
#44
Louisiana
73.8 years
—
#44
Oklahoma
73.8 years
—
#44
Tennessee
73.8 years
—
#48
Kentucky
73.6 years
—
#49
Mississippi
72.6 years
—
#50
West Virginia
72.2 years
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.
Nebraska · 20239.7%
Nebraska rank#29among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted
Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.
Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Nebraska
2023 · Nebraska: 9.7% · Rank #29 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Nebraska Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
Period
Nebraska
Compare
2019
9.2%
2020
9%
2021
8.7%
2022
9.8%
2023
9.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · 9.7%2023 · Rank #29 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 9% – 10.3%Selected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Mississippi
15.1%
95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1
West Virginia
15.1%
95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3
Louisiana
14.6%
95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4
Alabama
14%
95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5
Arkansas
13.1%
95% CI: 12–14.3
#6
South Carolina
12.7%
95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6
Tennessee
12.7%
95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8
Texas
12.1%
95% CI: 11–13.3
#9
Indiana
11.7%
95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10
Georgia
11.5%
95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10
Ohio
11.5%
95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12
Oklahoma
11.3%
95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13
Delaware
11.1%
95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14
North Carolina
11%
95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15
Illinois
10.9%
95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15
Maryland
10.9%
95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15
Michigan
10.9%
95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18
Nevada
10.8%
95% CI: 8.9–13
#18
New Mexico
10.8%
95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20
Missouri
10.7%
95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20
South Dakota
10.7%
95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22
California
10.6%
95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23
Kansas
10.5%
95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24
Virginia
10.4%
95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25
Florida
10.1%
95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26
Rhode Island
10%
95% CI: 9.1–11
#27
Arizona
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27
Iowa
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29
Nebraska · your comparison
9.7%
95% CI: 9–10.3
#30
Wisconsin
9.6%
95% CI: 9–10.2
#31
Hawaii
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31
New York
9.5%
95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31
Oregon
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34
Wyoming
9.4%
95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35
Minnesota
9.3%
95% CI: 8.6–10
#36
New Jersey
9.1%
95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37
Maine
9%
95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38
North Dakota
8.9%
95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39
Idaho
8.7%
95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40
Washington
8.6%
95% CI: 8.2–9
#41
Massachusetts
8.5%
95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42
Connecticut
8.4%
95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43
Alaska
8.2%
95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44
Utah
8.1%
95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45
Colorado
8%
95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46
Montana
7.9%
95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46
New Hampshire
7.9%
95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48
Vermont
7.8%
95% CI: 7–8.7
—
Kentucky
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Pennsylvania
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.
Nebraska · June 30, 202649.1%
Nebraska rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Primary care · need met
HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.
National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · 49.1%June 30, 2026 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Jersey
83.2%
—
#2
Vermont
82.6%
—
#3
South Carolina
79.4%
—
#4
New Hampshire
74.8%
—
#5
Rhode Island
74.3%
—
#6
Louisiana
72.1%
—
#7
Hawaii
67.1%
—
#8
Utah
65.4%
—
#9
Wisconsin
65.2%
—
#10
Alabama
63%
—
#11
Connecticut
60.3%
—
#12
Massachusetts
58%
—
#13
Tennessee
58%
—
#14
Virginia
57.2%
—
#15
Pennsylvania
56.7%
—
#16
Maine
56%
—
#17
Minnesota
55.4%
—
#18
Wyoming
54.4%
—
#19
Indiana
54.2%
—
#20
California
53.2%
—
#21
Arkansas
52.6%
—
#22
Texas
49.8%
—
#23
Ohio
49.7%
—
#24
Nebraska · your comparison
49.1%
—
#25
Alaska
48.9%
—
#26
North Carolina
48.1%
—
#27
Colorado
47.5%
—
#28
Michigan
44.9%
—
#29
Oregon
43.9%
—
#30
Idaho
43.9%
—
#31
Washington
42.4%
—
#32
Illinois
41.5%
—
#33
Nevada
41.5%
—
#34
Arizona
41.2%
—
#35
Kansas
41.1%
—
#36
Iowa
40.5%
—
#37
Florida
39.7%
—
#38
Georgia
39.1%
—
#39
Montana
38.5%
—
#40
West Virginia
38.3%
—
#41
North Dakota
36.5%
—
#42
New York
35.3%
—
#43
South Dakota
34.6%
—
#44
Mississippi
34.1%
—
#45
Maryland
31.6%
—
#46
New Mexico
31.4%
—
#47
Kentucky
30.8%
—
#48
Oklahoma
28.6%
—
#49
Missouri
23.7%
—
#50
Delaware
11.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.
Nebraska · 2020$7,611
Nebraska rank#6among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Single coverage premium · all firms
Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.
Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · $7,6112020 · Rank #6 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alaska
$8,635
—
#2
New York
$8,177
—
#3
New Hampshire
$7,991
—
#4
Vermont
$7,868
—
#5
Wyoming
$7,743
—
#6
Nebraska · your comparison
$7,611
—
#7
South Carolina
$7,516
—
#8
Connecticut
$7,501
—
#9
Maine
$7,496
—
#10
Massachusetts
$7,452
—
#11
Washington
$7,440
—
#12
New Mexico
$7,424
—
#13
Illinois
$7,376
—
#14
New Jersey
$7,373
—
#15
Maryland
$7,352
—
#16
Rhode Island
$7,326
—
#17
Indiana
$7,319
—
#18
Delaware
$7,280
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7,250
—
#20
Pennsylvania
$7,246
—
#21
North Dakota
$7,216
—
#22
Colorado
$7,206
—
#23
Missouri
$7,179
—
#24
California
$7,173
—
#25
Florida
$7,078
—
#26
South Dakota
$7,070
—
#27
Oklahoma
$7,058
—
#28
Hawaii
$7,040
—
#29
North Carolina
$7,036
—
#30
Texas
$7,017
—
#31
West Virginia
$6,993
—
#32
Ohio
$6,989
—
#33
Kentucky
$6,949
—
#34
Iowa
$6,932
—
#35
Virginia
$6,928
—
#36
Oregon
$6,917
—
#37
Minnesota
$6,910
—
#38
Georgia
$6,876
—
#39
Montana
$6,860
—
#40
Idaho
$6,744
—
#41
Louisiana
$6,713
—
#42
Michigan
$6,683
—
#43
Kansas
$6,675
—
#44
Arizona
$6,612
—
#45
Utah
$6,593
—
#46
Mississippi
$6,561
—
#47
Nevada
$6,493
—
#48
Tennessee
$6,485
—
#49
Arkansas
$6,414
—
#50
Alabama
$6,393
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.
Nebraska · 2023–202424.1%
Nebraska rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+
Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.
Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Nebraska stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Nebraska has a dark outline.
Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Nebraska · 24.1%2023–2024 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Nebraska with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Oregon
31.6%
—
#2
Vermont
29.1%
—
#3
West Virginia
28.1%
—
#4
Washington
27.9%
—
#5
New Hampshire
27.7%
—
#6
Tennessee
27%
—
#7
Utah
26.7%
—
#8
Maine
26.7%
—
#9
Arkansas
26.6%
—
#10
Colorado
26.4%
—
#11
Rhode Island
25.8%
—
#12
Missouri
25.7%
—
#13
Montana
25.6%
—
#14
Indiana
25.3%
—
#15
Kentucky
25.3%
—
#16
Georgia
25.2%
—
#17
Iowa
25%
—
#18
Massachusetts
24.9%
—
#19
Wyoming
24.7%
—
#20
Nevada
24.6%
—
#21
Arizona
24.6%
—
#22
Wisconsin
24.6%
—
#23
Idaho
24.5%
—
#24
Nebraska · your comparison
24.1%
—
#25
Louisiana
24.1%
—
#26
Alaska
24%
—
#27
Pennsylvania
23.9%
—
#28
New Mexico
23.9%
—
#28
Ohio
23.9%
—
#30
Connecticut
23.7%
—
#31
Kansas
23.7%
—
#32
Michigan
23.6%
—
#33
Virginia
23.1%
—
#34
Alabama
23%
—
#35
North Dakota
23%
—
#36
Maryland
22.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
22.6%
—
#38
Minnesota
22.6%
—
#39
Illinois
22.2%
—
#40
Delaware
22.1%
—
#41
New York
21.9%
—
#42
South Dakota
21.8%
—
#43
California
21.6%
—
#44
North Carolina
21.4%
—
#45
Florida
20.8%
—
#46
Texas
20.7%
—
#47
Mississippi
20.5%
—
#48
Hawaii
19.8%
—
#49
South Carolina
19.8%
—
#50
New Jersey
18.1%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
19 of 19 reviewed Nebraska actions · newest first
Apr 17, 2026 · LB 957 · Provide a cause of action against certain adults for allowing a minor to possess a handgun and create an offense of leaving a loaded firearm in a location accessible to a minor · Indefinitely postponedNebraska Legislature · LB 957
Provide a cause of action against certain adults for allowing a minor to possess a handgun and create an offense of leaving a loaded firearm in a location accessible to a minor
Apr 17, 2026 · Indefinitely postponed
John Cavanaugh · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed section 5 of LB 957 proposed a Class I misdemeanor when a person leaves a loaded firearm without a trigger lock, locked container or another reasonably secure location; knows or has reason to believe a child under 14 is likely to gain access without parental or guardian permission; and the child actually gains access without that consent and publicly displays the firearm or uses it to cause bodily injury or death. The exceptions concern access resulting from unlawful entry by any person and legally justified possession or use. The bill was indefinitely postponed and did not enact this offense.
Indefinitely postponed on 2026-04-17. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 5. (1) A person commits an offense if: (a) Such person stores or leaves a loaded firearm which is not (i) secured by a trigger lock mechanism, (ii) placed in a securely locked box or container, or (iii) placed in some other location which a reasonable person would believe to be secure from a minor under the age of fourteen years; (b) Such person knows or has reason to believe that a minor under the age of fourteen years is likely to gain access to the firearm without the permission of the minor's parent or guardian; (c) The minor gains access to the firearm without the consent of the minor's parent or guardian; and (d) The minor exhibits the firearm in a public place or uses the firearm to cause bodily injury or death to a person. (2) This section does not apply if: (a) The minor obtains the firearm as a result of an unlawful entry by any person; or (b) If the minor's possession or use of the firearm is justified under sections 28-1406 to 28-1416. (3) A violation of this subsection is a Class I misdemeanor.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 17, 2026 · LB 1088 · Require persons convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence or subject to domestic abuse protection orders to surrender firearms for a period of time · Indefinitely postponedNebraska Legislature · LB 1088
Require persons convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence or subject to domestic abuse protection orders to surrender firearms for a period of time
Apr 17, 2026 · Indefinitely postponed
Jane Raybould · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed section 1 of LB 1088 proposed court orders requiring surrender of firearms and ammunition following specified domestic-abuse protection orders or misdemeanor convictions. It sets a general deadline of 48 hours after receipt of the order and, for an incarcerated domestic-violence misdemeanant, 48 hours after release unless an earlier period is agreed in writing by the respondent and court, storage and return procedures, and misdemeanor penalties for noncompliance. Protection-order restrictions track the order’s duration; the specified domestic-violence conviction restriction lasts seven years after conviction. The bill was indefinitely postponed.
Indefinitely postponed on 2026-04-17. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (1) For purposes of this section: (a) Firearm has the same meaning as in section 28-1201; (b) Misdemeanor crime of domestic violence has the same meaning as in section 28-1206; (c) Qualified third party means: (i) A county sheriff, police officer, or member of the Nebraska State Patrol; (ii) A firearm dealer licensed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 923; or (iii) Any other responsible adult named by a court in an order under this section; and (d) Respondent means the person subject to an order under this section. (2) A court shall enter an order requiring a person to surrender all firearms and ammunition in his or her possession when: (a) Issuing a domestic abuse protection order as provided in section 26-115; (b) Sentencing a defendant to a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence as provided in section 10 of this act; (c) Sentencing a defendant for a misdemeanor violation of a domestic abuse protection order or foreign domestic abuse protection order as provided in section 26-118; or (d) Issuing an order relating to a foreign domestic abuse protection order as provided in section 9 of this act. (3) An order under this section shall: (a) Require the respondent, within the deadline required by subsection (4) of this section, to: (i) Surrender all firearms or ammunition in the respondent's possession in this state to a qualified third party; and (ii) Complete the affidavit under subsection (6) of this section and deliver it to the sheriff, county attorney, the designee of the sheriff or county attorney, or any person named by the court in the order; (b) Order the respondent not to possess any firearms or ammunition for the period of time provided in subsection (5) of this section; (c) Notify the respondent that the respondent may be responsible for paying any costs of storing such firearms or ammunition; (d) Notify the respondent that following the expiration of the period of time provided for in subsection (5) of this section, the respondent may reclaim possession of such firearms or ammunition, unless otherwise prohibited by law from possessing such firearms or ammunition at that time; and (e) Notify the respondent of the penalty for violating this section or section 28-1206. (4)(a) Except as provided in subdivision (4)(b) of this section, the respondent shall surrender all firearms and ammunition in the respondent's possession in this state to a qualified third party and complete and return the affidavit under subsection (6) of this section within forty-eight hours after receipt of the order under subsection (3) of this section. (b) For a respondent who is convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence and sentenced to a period of incarceration, the deadline in this subsection shall be forty-eight hours after release from incarceration, unless an earlier period is agreed to in writing by the respondent and the court, in which case a responsible person designated by the incarcerated respondent may surrender the respondent's firearms and ammunition and complete the affidavit on the respondent's behalf. (5) An order issued under this section shall remain in effect: (a) For an order arising from any protection order, so long as such protection order is in effect, including any renewals; and (b) For an order arising from a conviction for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, for a period of seven years following such conviction. (6) The State Court Administrator shall develop a standard affidavit form for use under this section. The administrator shall develop such form in consultation with advocacy groups dedicated to ending sexual and domestic violence. The administrator shall make the form available on a judicial branch website accessible to the public. (7) Prior to release from incarceration for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, a county jail or prison shall provide a respondent with written notice of his or her obligations under this section. (8) Upon issuance of an order under this section, the court shall transmit a copy of such order to the sheriff and any other local law enforcement agency in the county where the respondent resides and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. (9) A law enforcement agency that takes possession of firearms or ammunition under this section shall: (a) Maintain such firearms and ammunition in a secure location; (b) Develop procedures for returning such firearms and ammunition to a respondent following expiration of the period described in subsection (5) of this section; and (c) Verify that a respondent may lawfully possess any such firearms or ammunition before returning them to the respondent. (10) A respondent who fails to comply with an order issued under this section shall be guilty of a Class I misdemeanor.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 17, 2026 · LB 512 · Adopt the Chemical Abortion Safety Protocol Act · Indefinitely postponedNebraska Legislature · LB 512
Adopt the Chemical Abortion Safety Protocol Act
Apr 17, 2026 · Indefinitely postponed
Rick Holdcroft · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LB 512 proposed in-person examination and documentation before a physician provides an abortion-inducing drug, a follow-up visit 3–14 days after the drug is provided, and reporting within 30 days after the end of the calendar month in which the drug is provided, excluding patient-identifying information. The reviewed provisions exclude drugs provided for other medical reasons and do not impose liability on the woman receiving the abortion. The bill was indefinitely postponed; its proposed requirements were not enacted.
Indefinitely postponed on 2026-04-17. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
This fact counts abortions reported as performed in Nebraska in 2025, regardless of the patient’s residence. It is not a count of all abortions obtained by Nebraska residents in other states. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Abortions reported as performed in Nebraska. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 2. For purposes of the Chemical Abortion Safety Protocol Act: (1) Abortion-inducing drug means a drug or other substance, including a regimen of two or more drugs or substances, that is provided to a woman known to be pregnant, with the specific intent of terminating the life of her preborn child. An abortion-inducing drug shall not include a drug, medicine, or other substance that may be known to cause an abortion but is provided for other medical reasons; (2) Adverse event means any harmful event or outcome arising out of the provision of an abortion-inducing drug, including: (a) Shock; (b) heavy or prolonged bleeding; (c) hemorrhage; (d) aspiration or allergic response; (e) infection; (f) sepsis; (g) pelvic inflammatory disease; (h) incomplete abortion; (i) failure to terminate the pregnancy; (j) missed ectopic pregnancy; (k) death; or (l) any other adverse event as defined by the federal Food and Drug Administration as reported by MedWatch. (3) Department means the Department of Health and Human Services; and (4) Provide, when used with regard to an abortion-inducing drug, means any act of giving, selling, dispensing, administering, transferring possession of, or prescribing an abortion-inducing drug. Sec. 3. Before a physician provides an abortion-inducing drug, the physician shall: (1) Examine the woman in person; (2) Independently verify that the woman is pregnant; (3) Determine whether the woman has an ectopic pregnancy; (4) Document in the medical record the gestational age and location of the pregnancy; (5) Determine the woman's blood type, and if a woman is Rh negative, offer to administer Rh immunoglobin to prevent Rh incompatibility, complications, or miscarriage in future pregnancies; and (6) Document in the medical record whether or not the woman received treatment for Rh negativity. Sec. 4. A physician who provides an abortion-inducing drug, or the physician's agent, shall schedule a follow-up visit between the physician and the woman to whom the abortion-inducing drug was provided. Such follow-up visit shall occur no earlier than the third day and no later than the fourteenth day after the date the abortion-inducing drug was provided. At the follow-up visit, the physician shall: (1) Confirm that the woman's pregnancy is completely terminated; (2) Assess the woman for adverse events occurring after the provision of the abortion-inducing drug, including any continued blood loss; and (3) Document any adverse events in the woman's medical record. Sec. 5. (1) A physician who provides an abortion-inducing drug shall file a report with the department within thirty days after the end of the calendar month in which the abortion-inducing drug was provided. Such report shall include, in addition to any information required by rules and regulations adopted and promulgated by the department: (a) The name of the physician; (b) The name of the abortion-inducing drug provided and the date each drug was provided to the woman; (c) The date the woman returned for a follow-up visit, if applicable; (d) Documentation of any adverse events that occurred after provision of the abortion-inducing drug; (e) Any follow-up treatment provided by the physician; and (f) If the woman was referred to another health care provider, the purpose of such referral. (2) The department shall produce a standard form for filing such report. (3) The report shall not include any personally identifying information for a woman to whom an abortion-inducing drug was provided. Sec. 6. No woman upon whom an abortion is attempted, induced, or performed shall be liable for a violation of the Chemical Abortion Safety Protocol Act.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 17, 2026 · LB 812 · Provide requirements for the Department of Health and Human Services relating to medicaid eligibility redeterminations and community engagement · Indefinitely postponedNebraska Legislature · LB 812
Provide requirements for the Department of Health and Human Services relating to medicaid eligibility redeterminations and community engagement
Apr 17, 2026 · Indefinitely postponed
Eliot Bostar · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LB 812 proposed limiting Medicaid eligibility redeterminations to the frequency required by the cited federal law. Its reviewed provision would delay community-engagement requirements until the later of the date required by the cited federal law or CMS, require no more than one month of compliance or exemption for applicants and for enrollees since their most recent application or renewal, and verify compliance or exemption only at redetermination and no more often than every six months. It was indefinitely postponed; these proposed state limits were not enacted by this bill.
Indefinitely postponed on 2026-04-17. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The fact measures people under age 65 without health insurance. Eligibility for coverage directly concerns this population; payment for a particular service for people already insured does not itself establish expanded insurance enrollment. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(5)(a) The department shall redetermine eligibility for the medical assistance program no more frequently than required by 42 U.S.C. 1396a(e) (14)(L), as such section existed on January 1, 2026. (b) The department shall implement community engagement requirements for the medical assistance program only as required by 42 U.S.C. 1396a(xx), as such section existed on January 1, 2026, and the department shall: (i) Implement community engagement requirements no earlier than the date required by 42 U.S.C. 1396a(xx), as such section existed on January 1, 2026, or by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, whichever is later; (ii) Require no more than one month of compliance with, or exemption from, the community engagement requirements for (A) applicants for medical assistance; and (B) enrollees since the most recent application or renewal; and (iii) Verify community engagement requirement compliance or exemption status only at redetermination of eligibility and not more frequently than once every six months.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Apr 2, 2026 · Executive Order 26-10 · Rescission of Order 26-08’s burn-permit suspension · Signed; Order 26-08 rescinded immediatelyGovernor · Executive Order 26-10
Rescission of Order 26-08’s burn-permit suspension
Apr 2, 2026 · Signed; Order 26-08 rescinded immediately
Gov. Jim Pillen · Issued
Reviewed signed executive order
Order 26-10 rescinded all of Order 26-08 effective immediately on April 2, 2026. Its recitals report improved conditions and a reduced risk assessment by the emergency-management agency; those assertions are not independently verified weather observations. The rescission order calls Order 26-08 issued March 26, while the original signed order and official archive show March 25. That unresolved recital discrepancy does not support extending Order 26-08’s measures to April 10. Burn-permit controls address wildfire hazards to people and property. This is emergency-safety context, without verified injuries, smoke exposure or health outcomes.
Signed 2026-04-02. Signed; Order 26-08 rescinded immediately. Issuance is verified; implementation and current requirements remain separate.
Why this record is included
Burn-permit controls address wildfire hazards to people and property. This is emergency-safety context, without verified injuries, smoke exposure or health outcomes.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · crime · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Order 26-10 rescinded all of Order 26-08 effective immediately on April 2, 2026. Its recitals report improved conditions and a reduced risk assessment by the emergency-management agency; those assertions are not independently verified weather observations.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Mar 25, 2026 · Executive Order 26-08 · Later burn-permit suspension, subsequently rescinded · Signed March 25; effective March 28; rescinded April 2Governor · Executive Order 26-08
Later burn-permit suspension, subsequently rescinded
Mar 25, 2026 · Signed March 25; effective March 28; rescinded April 2
Gov. Jim Pillen · Issued
Reviewed signed executive order
Order 26-08 suspended the specified burn statutes, fire chiefs’ waiver authority and existing burn permits statewide from March 28, 2026 at midnight, with a stated endpoint of April 10 at 11:59 p.m. Burn permits in red-flag or similar warning locations have no exception for the duration of the warning. It states that the emergency does not trigger the transportation-network-company dynamic-pricing prohibition. Order 26-10 rescinded the whole Order 26-08 immediately on April 2, before its stated April 10 endpoint. The signed original and official archive show March 25. Order 26-10’s recital calls Order 26-08 issued March 26; that date discrepancy remains unresolved. The milestone uses the original signing date and retains the separate effective and rescission dates. Burn-permit controls address wildfire hazards to people and property. This is emergency-safety context, without verified injuries, smoke exposure or health outcomes.
Signed 2026-03-25. Signed March 25; effective March 28; rescinded April 2. Issuance is verified; implementation and current requirements remain separate.
Why this record is included
Burn-permit controls address wildfire hazards to people and property. This is emergency-safety context, without verified injuries, smoke exposure or health outcomes.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: health · reviewed policy context · crime · reviewed policy context. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Order 26-08 suspended the specified burn statutes, fire chiefs’ waiver authority and existing burn permits statewide from March 28, 2026 at midnight, with a stated endpoint of April 10 at 11:59 p.m. Burn permits in red-flag or similar warning locations have no exception for the duration of the warning.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Nebraska officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Nebraska candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
84 statements from 14 candidates
2026 Nebraska Governor — General Election
3 candidates with matching statements · 4 statements
Nebraskans work hard for a living and should be able to afford to take care of their families. The essentials like housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries are too expensive. I will work with state and national leaders to address our affordability crisis.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A Different Kind of Leader for Nebraska.
Candidate campaign source
Nebraskans work hard for a living and should be able to afford to take care of their families. The essentials like housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries are too expensive. I will work with state and national leaders to address our affordability crisis.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
Nebraskans work hard for a living and should be able to afford to take care of their families. The essentials like housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries are too expensive. I will work with state and national leaders to address our affordability crisis.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing affordability
Candidate campaign source
Nebraskans work hard for a living and should be able to afford to take care of their families. The essentials like housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries are too expensive. I will work with state and national leaders to address our affordability crisis.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
We need an air horn and a VETO stamp to protect our votes from getting changed to policy we didn't vote for. They want to lower the minimum wage of our 14-16 year old child workforce from $15 an hour to $13.50......Wow......Can 14 year-olds vote for or negotiate their employee rights?? They killed i…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections
Candidate campaign source
We need an air horn and a VETO stamp to protect our votes from getting changed to policy we didn't vote for. They want to lower the minimum wage of our 14-16 year old child workforce from $15 an hour to $13.50......Wow......Can 14 year-olds vote for or negotiate their employee rights?? They killed initiative 436, our voter approved sick leave increases for young workers, seasonal, and temporary workers, while removing their rights to sue for employer violations. It's unbelievable. They block our medical cannabis, dilute our voter approved minimum wage increases, and drastically delay our Medicaid expansion.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The will of the voters.... Our current governor and legislature repetitively deny the vote of the same people that put them in office. As a third party governor, I feel the unicameral will accomplish more and actually function as intended by encouraging the republicans and democrats to work together…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Government ethics, accountability, and elections
Candidate campaign source
The will of the voters.... Our current governor and legislature repetitively deny the vote of the same people that put them in office. As a third party governor, I feel the unicameral will accomplish more and actually function as intended by encouraging the republicans and democrats to work together instead of against each other. It’s simple. I will uphold the will of the vote, even if I don’t agree with it. I am not red or blue and am the only candidate that's never taken a dollar from any political party or private interest group. I will listen to you, not a bag of money. I'm excited about the $105,000 governor's salary with health insurance when other candidates are deeply connected to million$ in special interest party funding.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Boosting Revenue and Trust: Efficient workflows lead to higher compliance rates, helping local communities reinvest in themselves. Reliable licensing also protects consumers, building public confidence in everyday industries from agriculture to healthcare.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Agriculture and rural communities
Candidate campaign source
Boosting Revenue and Trust: Efficient workflows lead to higher compliance rates, helping local communities reinvest in themselves. Reliable licensing also protects consumers, building public confidence in everyday industries from agriculture to healthcare.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I support Medicare For All—comprehensive coverage that follows you from job to job, farm to town, covering prescriptions, dental, vision, and mental health. No premiums. No deductibles. No bankruptcies.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Social Security, Medicare, and retirement
Candidate campaign source
I support Medicare For All—comprehensive coverage that follows you from job to job, farm to town, covering prescriptions, dental, vision, and mental health. No premiums. No deductibles. No bankruptcies.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Nebraska candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Nebraska incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Nebraska legislators and Nebraska’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Nebraska’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
8 matching sponsorships or proposals · 8 Nebraska incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Eliot Bostar
Nebraska Senate, District 29 · –NE
1 proposalView proposals from Eliot BostarNebraska Legislature · LB 812
Provide requirements for the Department of Health and Human Services relating to medicaid eligibility redeterminations and community engagement
Apr 17, 2026 · Indefinitely postponed
Eliot Bostar · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
LB 812 proposed limiting Medicaid eligibility redeterminations to the frequency required by the cited federal law. Its reviewed provision would delay community-engagement requirements until the later of the date required by the cited federal law or CMS, require no more than one month of compliance or exemption for applicants and for enrollees since their most recent application or renewal, and verify compliance or exemption only at redetermination and no more often than every six months. It was indefinitely postponed; these proposed state limits were not enacted by this bill.
Indefinitely postponed on 2026-04-17. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The fact measures people under age 65 without health insurance. Eligibility for coverage directly concerns this population; payment for a particular service for people already insured does not itself establish expanded insurance enrollment. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(5)(a) The department shall redetermine eligibility for the medical assistance program no more frequently than required by 42 U.S.C. 1396a(e) (14)(L), as such section existed on January 1, 2026. (b) The department shall implement community engagement requirements for the medical assistance program only as required by 42 U.S.C. 1396a(xx), as such section existed on January 1, 2026, and the department shall: (i) Implement community engagement requirements no earlier than the date required by 42 U.S.C. 1396a(xx), as such section existed on January 1, 2026, or by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, whichever is later; (ii) Require no more than one month of compliance with, or exemption from, the community engagement requirements for (A) applicants for medical assistance; and (B) enrollees since the most recent application or renewal; and (iii) Verify community engagement requirement compliance or exemption status only at redetermination of eligibility and not more frequently than once every six months.
1 proposalView proposals from Jane RaybouldNebraska Legislature · LB 1088
Require persons convicted of misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence or subject to domestic abuse protection orders to surrender firearms for a period of time
Apr 17, 2026 · Indefinitely postponed
Jane Raybould · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed section 1 of LB 1088 proposed court orders requiring surrender of firearms and ammunition following specified domestic-abuse protection orders or misdemeanor convictions. It sets a general deadline of 48 hours after receipt of the order and, for an incarcerated domestic-violence misdemeanant, 48 hours after release unless an earlier period is agreed in writing by the respondent and court, storage and return procedures, and misdemeanor penalties for noncompliance. Protection-order restrictions track the order’s duration; the specified domestic-violence conviction restriction lasts seven years after conviction. The bill was indefinitely postponed.
Indefinitely postponed on 2026-04-17. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. (1) For purposes of this section: (a) Firearm has the same meaning as in section 28-1201; (b) Misdemeanor crime of domestic violence has the same meaning as in section 28-1206; (c) Qualified third party means: (i) A county sheriff, police officer, or member of the Nebraska State Patrol; (ii) A firearm dealer licensed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 923; or (iii) Any other responsible adult named by a court in an order under this section; and (d) Respondent means the person subject to an order under this section. (2) A court shall enter an order requiring a person to surrender all firearms and ammunition in his or her possession when: (a) Issuing a domestic abuse protection order as provided in section 26-115; (b) Sentencing a defendant to a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence as provided in section 10 of this act; (c) Sentencing a defendant for a misdemeanor violation of a domestic abuse protection order or foreign domestic abuse protection order as provided in section 26-118; or (d) Issuing an order relating to a foreign domestic abuse protection order as provided in section 9 of this act. (3) An order under this section shall: (a) Require the respondent, within the deadline required by subsection (4) of this section, to: (i) Surrender all firearms or ammunition in the respondent's possession in this state to a qualified third party; and (ii) Complete the affidavit under subsection (6) of this section and deliver it to the sheriff, county attorney, the designee of the sheriff or county attorney, or any person named by the court in the order; (b) Order the respondent not to possess any firearms or ammunition for the period of time provided in subsection (5) of this section; (c) Notify the respondent that the respondent may be responsible for paying any costs of storing such firearms or ammunition; (d) Notify the respondent that following the expiration of the period of time provided for in subsection (5) of this section, the respondent may reclaim possession of such firearms or ammunition, unless otherwise prohibited by law from possessing such firearms or ammunition at that time; and (e) Notify the respondent of the penalty for violating this section or section 28-1206. (4)(a) Except as provided in subdivision (4)(b) of this section, the respondent shall surrender all firearms and ammunition in the respondent's possession in this state to a qualified third party and complete and return the affidavit under subsection (6) of this section within forty-eight hours after receipt of the order under subsection (3) of this section. (b) For a respondent who is convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence and sentenced to a period of incarceration, the deadline in this subsection shall be forty-eight hours after release from incarceration, unless an earlier period is agreed to in writing by the respondent and the court, in which case a responsible person designated by the incarcerated respondent may surrender the respondent's firearms and ammunition and complete the affidavit on the respondent's behalf. (5) An order issued under this section shall remain in effect: (a) For an order arising from any protection order, so long as such protection order is in effect, including any renewals; and (b) For an order arising from a conviction for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, for a period of seven years following such conviction. (6) The State Court Administrator shall develop a standard affidavit form for use under this section. The administrator shall develop such form in consultation with advocacy groups dedicated to ending sexual and domestic violence. The administrator shall make the form available on a judicial branch website accessible to the public. (7) Prior to release from incarceration for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, a county jail or prison shall provide a respondent with written notice of his or her obligations under this section. (8) Upon issuance of an order under this section, the court shall transmit a copy of such order to the sheriff and any other local law enforcement agency in the county where the respondent resides and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. (9) A law enforcement agency that takes possession of firearms or ammunition under this section shall: (a) Maintain such firearms and ammunition in a secure location; (b) Develop procedures for returning such firearms and ammunition to a respondent following expiration of the period described in subsection (5) of this section; and (c) Verify that a respondent may lawfully possess any such firearms or ammunition before returning them to the respondent. (10) A respondent who fails to comply with an order issued under this section shall be guilty of a Class I misdemeanor.
1 proposalView proposals from John CavanaughNebraska Legislature · LB 957
Provide a cause of action against certain adults for allowing a minor to possess a handgun and create an offense of leaving a loaded firearm in a location accessible to a minor
Apr 17, 2026 · Indefinitely postponed
John Cavanaugh · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed section 5 of LB 957 proposed a Class I misdemeanor when a person leaves a loaded firearm without a trigger lock, locked container or another reasonably secure location; knows or has reason to believe a child under 14 is likely to gain access without parental or guardian permission; and the child actually gains access without that consent and publicly displays the firearm or uses it to cause bodily injury or death. The exceptions concern access resulting from unlawful entry by any person and legally justified possession or use. The bill was indefinitely postponed and did not enact this offense.
Indefinitely postponed on 2026-04-17. This bill did not enact the reviewed proposal.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Sec. 5. (1) A person commits an offense if: (a) Such person stores or leaves a loaded firearm which is not (i) secured by a trigger lock mechanism, (ii) placed in a securely locked box or container, or (iii) placed in some other location which a reasonable person would believe to be secure from a minor under the age of fourteen years; (b) Such person knows or has reason to believe that a minor under the age of fourteen years is likely to gain access to the firearm without the permission of the minor's parent or guardian; (c) The minor gains access to the firearm without the consent of the minor's parent or guardian; and (d) The minor exhibits the firearm in a public place or uses the firearm to cause bodily injury or death to a person. (2) This section does not apply if: (a) The minor obtains the firearm as a result of an unlawful entry by any person; or (b) If the minor's possession or use of the firearm is justified under sections 28-1406 to 28-1416. (3) A violation of this subsection is a Class I misdemeanor.
1 proposalView proposals from Kathleen KauthNebraska Legislature · LB 574
Adopt the Let Them Grow Act and the Preborn Child Protection Act and provide for discipline under the Uniform Credentialing Act
May 22, 2023 · Enacted
Kathleen Kauth · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed Preborn Child Protection Act provisions of the final LB 574 prohibit physician-provided abortions at twelve or more weeks as dated from the last menstrual period, with medical-emergency, sexual-assault and incest exceptions. The definitions exclude ectopic-pregnancy removal and specified other care; the act does not impose civil or criminal liability on the woman receiving the abortion. Kathleen Kauth was the bill’s principal introducer; this attribution does not claim she authored every later amendment. The signing establishes enactment, not present enforceability or an effect on the 2025 abortion count. The emergency definition requires a threat of death or serious risk of substantial, irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function and excludes a claim or diagnosis based on the woman’s anticipated self-harming conduct. Physicians must document the applicable exception in the medical record.
Approved by Governor on 2023-05-22. Provisions/portions of LB626 amended into LB574 by AM1658. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
This fact counts abortions reported as performed in Nebraska in 2025, regardless of the patient’s residence. It is not a count of all abortions obtained by Nebraska residents in other states. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Abortions reported as performed in Nebraska. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Section 1. Sections 1 to 6 of this act shall be known and may be cited as the Preborn Child Protection Act. Sec. 2. The Preborn Child Protection Act only applies to intrauterine pregnancies. Sec. 3. For purposes of the Preborn Child Protection Act: (1)(a) Abortion means the prescription or use of any instrument, device, medicine, drug, or substance to or upon a woman known to be pregnant with the specific intent of terminating the life of her preborn child. (b) Abortion shall under no circumstances be interpreted to include: (i) Removal of an ectopic pregnancy; (ii) Removal of the remains of a preborn child who has already died; (iii) An act done with the intention to save the life or preserve the health of the preborn child; (iv) The accidental or unintentional termination of the life of a preborn child; or (v) During the practice of in vitro fertilization or another assisted reproductive technology, the termination or loss of the life of a preborn child who is not being carried inside a woman's body; (2) Gestational age means the age of a preborn child as calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period of the pregnant woman; (3)(a) Medical emergency means any condition which, in reasonable medical judgment, so complicates the medical condition of the pregnant woman as to necessitate the termination of her pregnancy to avert her death or for which a delay in terminating her pregnancy will create a serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function. (b) No condition shall be deemed a medical emergency if based on a claim or diagnosis that the woman will engage in conduct which would result in her death or in substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function; (4) Preborn child means an individual living member of the species homo sapiens, throughout the embryonic and fetal stages of development to full gestation and childbirth; (5) Pregnant means the condition of having a living preborn child inside one's body; and (6) Reasonable medical judgment means a medical judgment that could be made by a reasonably prudent physician, knowledgeable about the case and the treatment possibilities with respect to the medical conditions involved. Sec. 4. (1) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, a physician, before performing or inducing an abortion, shall first: (a) Determine, using standard medical practice, the gestational age of the preborn child; and (b) Record in the pregnant woman's medical record: (i) The method used to determine the gestational age of the preborn child; and (ii) The date, time, and results of such determination. (2) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, it shall be unlawful for any physician to perform or induce an abortion: (a) Before fulfilling the requirements of subsection (1) of this section; or (b) If the probable gestational age of the preborn child has been determined to be twelve or more weeks. (3) It shall not be a violation of subsection (1) or (2) of this section for a physician to perform or induce an abortion in the case of: (a) Medical emergency; (b) Pregnancy resulting from sexual assault as defined in section 28-319 or 28-319.01; or (c) Pregnancy resulting from incest as defined in section 28-703. Sec. 5. (1) If a physician performs or induces an abortion because of a medical emergency pursuant to subdivision (3)(a) of section 4 of this act, the physician shall certify in writing that a medical emergency existed and explain the medical emergency in the written certification. The physician shall keep the written certification in the woman's medical record. (2) If a physician performs or induces an abortion in the case of sexual assault or incest pursuant to subdivision (3)(b) or (c) of section 4 of this act, the physician shall certify in writing that the abortion was performed because of sexual assault or incest and that the physician complied with all applicable duties imposed by section 28-902. The physician shall keep the written certification in the woman's medical record. Sec. 6. No woman upon whom an abortion is attempted, induced, or performed shall be liable for a violation of the Preborn Child Protection Act.
1 proposalView proposals from Megan HuntNebraska Legislature · LB 275
Require the Department of Health and Human Services to screen state wards for social security benefit eligibility
Jun 4, 2025 · Enacted
Megan Hunt · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed provision of LB 275 requires DHHS to screen each child entering its charge for Social Security eligibility within 60 days, apply when a child may qualify, and appeal a denial when necessary and in the child’s best interest. DHHS must give the child, guardian ad litem and parents written notices within ten calendar days of notification of each specified determination, approval or payee appointment, including the relevant payee and appeal information. This connection concerns OASDI child benefits; it does not count SSI as OASDI or establish completed applications or benefit awards.
Approved by Governor on 2025-06-04. Enactment, effective dates, implementation and current enforceability are distinct.
Why this record is included
The fact counts OASDI retirement, survivor and disability beneficiaries in current-payment status. Screening children for qualifying OASDI benefits concerns entry into that program; broader Social Security language is connected only for its OASDI component. SSI, Medicare, tax credits and Social Security number issuance are separate matters. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Nebraska residents receiving Social Security benefits. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
(3)(a) The department shall screen each child under its charge for social security benefit eligibility within sixty days after the date the child enters its charge. (b)(i) If the department determines that a child may be eligible for social security benefits, it shall submit an application for such benefits on behalf of the child and, if necessary and in the child's best interest, appeal a denied application. (ii) The department shall provide written notice to the child, using age- appropriate language, the child's guardian ad litem, and the child's parents, of all benefit eligibility determinations from the Social Security Administration, including benefit approval, denial, and appeal outcomes, within ten calendar days after the date the department is notified of such eligibility determination. (iii) If the child is approved to receive social security benefits, within ten calendar days after the date the department is notified of the approval, the department shall provide written notice to the child, using age-appropriate language, the child's guardian ad litem, and the child's parents, that adults known to the child may apply to be the child's representative payee for the purposes of receiving social security benefit payments. (iv) If the department is appointed to serve as the child's representative payee, within ten calendar days after the date the department is notified of such appointment, the department shall provide written notice to the child, using age-appropriate language, the child's guardian ad litem, and the child's parents, of such appointment, the child's and the child's parents' rights to appeal the appointment, and the deadline for such appeals.
U.S. House of Representatives, Nebraska District 2 · R–NE
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Don BaconU.S. Congress · Nebraska delegation · HR 2243
LEOSA Reform Act
May 15, 2025 · In Congress
Rep. Don Bacon · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The reviewed section 2 of HR 2243 would add people authorized under LEOSA to carry a concealed firearm to the listed exceptions to the federal school-zone possession prohibition. Don Bacon is the verified primary sponsor. The House-passed bill remains a proposal at the review cutoff; it does not demonstrate that firearm deaths changed.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.
Why this record is included
The mortality series includes firearm deaths across intents, including suicide and homicide. Storage rules and firearm regulation concern possible components of injury prevention without proving an effect on deaths. This connection does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain the earlier observed value.
Retained Nebraska evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
2.Conforming the Law Enforcement Officer Safety Act and the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990Section 922(q)(2)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended—(1)by striking or at the end of clause (vi);(2)by striking the period at the end of clause (vii) and inserting ; or; and(3)by adding at the end the following:(viii)by an individual authorized by section 926B or 926C to carry a concealed firearm..
Only current Nebraska officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Nebraska statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Nebraska snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Nebraska, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.