Montana · individual fact

Montana unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate3%2024 · #40 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents560,0462024 · #44 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer0.7%2025 · 11-month average · #46 of 50 · highest first

Montana over time

Explore Montana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Montana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Montana effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Montana change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Montana · source units
MontanaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 3%1.7%4.3%6.8%Montana, 2015: 4.3%Montana, 2016: 4.3%Montana, 2017: 4.1%Montana, 2018: 3.7%Montana, 2019: 3.5%Montana, 2020: 5.8%Montana, 2021: 3.4%Montana, 2022: 2.7%Montana, 2023: 2.7%Montana, 2024: 3%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 15National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Montana Legislature · 1● U.S. Congress · Montana delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 1■ Montana agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2015-12-012026-09-30

2 of 2 reviewed Montana actions match · 2 date markers shown. 15 major events shown separately.

Montana · 2024: 3% · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Montana Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodMontanaRankU.S. benchmark
20243%#40 of 504%
20232.7%#40 of 50Not available
20222.7%#40 of 50Not available
20213.4%#44 of 50Not available
20205.8%#41 of 50Not available
20193.5%#22 of 50Not available
20183.7%#26 of 50Not available
20174.1%#27 of 50Not available
20164.3%#32 of 50Not available
20154.3%#36 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Montana · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Montana · 20243%
Montana rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Montana
Annual unemployment rate history in Montana2.2%4.3%6.3%20152024
2024 · Montana: 3% · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Montana Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodMontanaCompare
20154.3%
20164.3%
20174.1%
20183.7%
20193.5%
20205.8%
20213.4%
20222.7%
20232.7%
20243%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Montana · 3%2024 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana · your comparison3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Montana · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Montana · 2025 · 11-month average0.7%
Montana rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Montana · 0.7%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana · your comparison0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Montana · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Montana · 20252%
Montana rank#24among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Montana
Annual real GDP growth history in Montana-3.3%2.1%7.6%20152025
2025 · Montana: 2% · Rank #24 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Montana Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodMontanaCompare
20153.5%
2016-1.2%
20172.7%
20182%
20191.6%
2020-0.4%
20216.3%
20224.6%
20234.9%
20242.6%
20252%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Montana · 2%2025 · Rank #24 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana · your comparison2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Montana · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Montana · December 202522,000
Montana rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Montana
Openings · number history in Montana-1,050,2003,596,0008,242,200July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Montana: 22,000 · Rank #42 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Montana Openings · number history
PeriodMontanaCompare
July 202527,000
August 202526,000
September 202527,000
October 202532,000
November 202523,000
December 202522,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Montana · 22,000December 2025 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana · your comparison22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Montana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

10 statements from 4 candidates

2026 Montana U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Aaron Flint

2 statements

Republican · U.S. House District 1 · MT

Jobs & workforce context

1. Expand timber harvests and resource extraction to create good-paying jobs. 2. Invest in workforce training, apprenticeships, and trade programs that prepare Montanans for high-demand careers. 3. Cut burdensome regulations that make it harder for small businesses, farmers, ranchers, and manufactur…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: On the Issues

Candidate campaign source

1. Expand timber harvests and resource extraction to create good-paying jobs. 2. Invest in workforce training, apprenticeships, and trade programs that prepare Montanans for high-demand careers. 3. Cut burdensome regulations that make it harder for small businesses, farmers, ranchers, and manufacturers to grow and hire workers. 4. Support made-in-Montana agriculture, protecting family farms and ranches. 5. Repeal the expensive taxes that prevent family farms, ranches, and small businesses from staying in the family.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Aaron Flint campaign source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Aaron Flint
Jobs & workforce context

1. Ban Wall Street from buying single-family homes. 2. The HELPER Act which authorizes federally backed mortgages for first responders and school teachers to buy a home in the community they serve. 3. Invest in programs that lead to good-paying jobs like the trades, logging, and manufacturing. 4. Ma…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: On the Issues

Candidate campaign source

1. Ban Wall Street from buying single-family homes. 2. The HELPER Act which authorizes federally backed mortgages for first responders and school teachers to buy a home in the community they serve. 3. Invest in programs that lead to good-paying jobs like the trades, logging, and manufacturing. 4. Make permanent the recent working families tax breaks like no tax on tips, overtime, and Social Security. 5. Unleash American energy for abundant and affordable energy to power our homes and businesses.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Aaron Flint campaign source 2 ↗

2026 Montana U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Independent · U.S. House District 2 · MT

Jobs & workforce context

5. Local Control is Paramount. I do not believe in either a federal or statewide mandate in either direction, for or against, with respect to data centers. Some communities may not want them, whereas other communities may. Some may not be interested the tax-base and local employment opportunities (o…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

5. Local Control is Paramount. I do not believe in either a federal or statewide mandate in either direction, for or against, with respect to data centers. Some communities may not want them, whereas other communities may. Some may not be interested the tax-base and local employment opportunities (or community enhancements), whereas others may be interested. It is a matter of local and regional choice – if for no other reason than that they are the group most likely to be affected by any ultimate decision to proceed.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 2 more statements from Michael D. Eisenhauer
Jobs & workforce context

4. Safeguards and Rules of Engagement (ROE). This is where the ground-rules are set and agreed upon, before construction ever begins. Certain guardrails are needed – and expected – by both our local and regional communities and the building organization(s). Not every facility needs to be governed by…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, environment, public lands, and utilities

Candidate campaign source

4. Safeguards and Rules of Engagement (ROE). This is where the ground-rules are set and agreed upon, before construction ever begins. Certain guardrails are needed – and expected – by both our local and regional communities and the building organization(s). Not every facility needs to be governed by the same set of guardrails; this is and should be a point of conjoined local and regional negotiations. This committee does not need 2 years to develop a work product – it might take 90-120 days, at most. The committee should be comprised of a reasonable number of representatives (of not more than 12 to 15 in total?) from the builder, operator, power-source operator, environmental protection agencies, local citizens, local elected leaders, the local workforce, and a conservation-minded community member. It does not need to be driven at the federal or state level, and should likely be limited in membership to only one state-wide politician or appointed official.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

Wherever possible, employee training or registered apprenticeship programs should be taken advantage of (or developed) to hire local citizens as a skilled workforce to operate and maintain these facilities, long-term.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

Wherever possible, employee training or registered apprenticeship programs should be taken advantage of (or developed) to hire local citizens as a skilled workforce to operate and maintain these facilities, long-term.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Montana U.S. Senate — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 5 statements

Alani Bankhead

4 statements

Democratic · U.S. Senate · MT

Jobs & workforce context

✓ Reverse this administration’s VA workforce cuts: rehire and restaff the nurses, doctors, mental-health providers, and claims processors veterans depend on; you can’t deliver care with the caregivers gone.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

✓ Reverse this administration’s VA workforce cuts: rehire and restaff the nurses, doctors, mental-health providers, and claims processors veterans depend on; you can’t deliver care with the caregivers gone.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 3 more statements from Alani Bankhead
Jobs & workforce context

✓ End Montana’s maternity-care deserts: fund rural and tribal obstetric care and the maternal-health workforce, and keep small-town labor and delivery open.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

✓ End Montana’s maternity-care deserts: fund rural and tribal obstetric care and the maternal-health workforce, and keep small-town labor and delivery open.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

✓ Back the Montana small businesses and co-ops that create the jobs, instead of writing the rules for the biggest corporations.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Taxes, economy, workers, agriculture, and affordability

Candidate campaign source

✓ Back the Montana small businesses and co-ops that create the jobs, instead of writing the rules for the biggest corporations.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

✓ Back the IDEA Full Funding Act (Washington promised 40% of special-ed costs and pays about 13%), make Secure Rural Schools funding permanent, and expand Workforce Pell for vo-tech and the trades.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education

Candidate campaign source

✓ Back the IDEA Full Funding Act (Washington promised 40% of special-ed costs and pays about 13%), make Secure Rural Schools funding permanent, and expand Workforce Pell for vo-tech and the trades.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Seth Bodnar

1 statement

Independent · U.S. Senate · MT

Jobs & workforce context

Targeted tax incentives for affordable and workforce housing development in rural and small-town Montana communities, where builders can't make the math work today

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Pillar One — Making The Montana Way of Life A Reality Again

Candidate campaign source

Targeted tax incentives for affordable and workforce housing development in rural and small-town Montana communities, where builders can't make the math work today

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Seth Bodnar campaign source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Montana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Montana incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Montana legislators and Montana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Montana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

1 matching sponsorship or proposal · 1 Montana incumbent. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Ed Buttrey

Montana House of Representatives, District 21 · R–MT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ed Buttrey
Montana Legislature · HB 245

AN ACT REVISING THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS AND THE TERMINATION DATE OF THE HEALTHY MONTANA HEALTH AND ECONOMIC LIVELIHOOD PARTNERSHIP ACT; REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT FOR CONTRACTING FOR TRAINING AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS; AMENDING SECTION 39-12-103, MCA; REPEALING SECTION 28, CHAPTER 368, LAWS OF 2015, SECTIONS 38 AND 48, CHAPTER 415, LAWS OF 2019, SECTION 17, CHAPTER 456, LAWS OF 2019, AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4, CHAPTER 318, LAWS OF 2021; AND PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATES

Mar 27, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 35

Rep. Ed Buttrey · Sponsored / Rep. Eric Albus · Co-sponsored / Rep. Brad Barker · Co-sponsored / Rep. David Bedey · Co-sponsored / Rep. Julie Darling · Co-sponsored / Rep. Llew Jones · Co-sponsored / Rep. Valerie Moore · Co-sponsored / Rep. George Nikolakakos · Co-sponsored / Rep. Melissa Nikolakakos · Co-sponsored / Rep. Greg Oblander · Co-sponsored / Rep. Gary Parry · Co-sponsored / Rep. Curtis Schomer · Co-sponsored / Rep. Eric Tilleman · Co-sponsored / Rep. Ken Walsh · Co-sponsored / Sen. Bruce "Butch" Gillespie · Co-sponsored / Sen. Josh Kassmier · Co-sponsored / Sen. Gayle Lammers · Co-sponsored / Sen. Denley Loge · Co-sponsored / Sen. Wendy McKamey · Co-sponsored / Sen. Russ Tempel · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 245 repeals the HELP Act termination provisions and revises workforce-development services for people receiving expanded Medicaid coverage. It directs contact and assessment assistance for participants subject to community-engagement requirements and removes the requirement to contract for those services. The workforce section specifies October 1, 2025; other provisions specify passage and approval. This connection concerns continued coverage authority, not proof of enrollment, implementation of work requirements or an uninsured-rate change.

The legislative docket records “Signed by Governor” and chapter 35. The displayed date is the docket timestamp, not an independently verified original execution date. Enactment does not prove implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The fact measures the uninsured share of residents under 65. Repealing the HELP Act termination provisions concerns continued Medicaid eligibility for qualifying adults, a subset of that population. The relationship does not establish enrollment numbers or a change in the uninsured share. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Montana evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. Section 39-12-103, MCA, is amended to read: "39-12-103. Montana HELP Act workforce development -- participation . (1) The department shall provide individuals receiving assistance for health care services pursuant to Title 53, chapter 6, part 13, with the option of participating in an employment or reemployment assessment in the workforce development program provided for in 39-12-101 to allow the participant to increase the participant's earning capacity and economic stability. The assessment must identify any probable barriers to employment that exist for the individual. (2) The department shall contact each program participant subject to the community engagement requirements of 53-6-1308 and assist the participant with completion of an employment or reemployment assessment. Based on the results of the assessment, the department shall provide the participant with workforce development services. (3) Allowable workforce development services include: (a) education and training; and (b) supportive services that assist a program participant with the items or services necessary to participate in the workforce, including but not limited to supportive services involving clothing, transportation, and equipment needed to obtain or maintain employment. (4) Entities contracting to provide workforce development services shall report quarterly to the department on the activities provided. At a minimum, the entities shall report on: (a) the number of clients enrolled in program activities and co-enrolled in other workforce programs; (b) the types of services provided; (c) the number of clients who attained a credential or gained a measurable skill; (d) the number of clients who exited the program; (e) the number of clients who exited the program to employment; (f) the number of clients who continued enrollment in the program; (g) the amount and type of outreach the entity has done to recruit program participants; and (h) the amount of money spent directly on participants. (5) (a) The department shall notify the department of public health and human services when a participant has received all services and assistance under subsection (1) that can reasonably be provided to the individual. (b) The department is not required to provide further services under this section after it has provided the notification provided for in subsection (5)(a). (c) A participant who is no longer receiving services under this section does not meet the criteria of 53-6-1307(6)(c) for the exemption granted under 53-6-1307(6). (6) The department shall report the following information to the legislative finance committee and the children, families, health, and human services interim committee in accordance with 5-11-210: (a) the activities undertaken to establish the employer grant program provided for in 39-12-106; (b) the number of employers receiving grant awards and the number and types of activities, training, or jobs the employers provided; and (c) the services provided and the total cost of providing workforce development services under this chapter, including related administrative costs. (7) To the extent possible, the department of public health and human services shall offset the cost of workforce development activities provided under this section by using temporary assistance for needy families reserve funds. (8) The department shall reduce fraud, waste, and abuse in determining and reviewing eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits by enhancing technology system support to provide knowledge-based authentication for verifying the identity and employment status of individuals seeking benefits, including the use of public records to confirm identity and to flag changes in demographics. " Section 2. Repealer. Section 28, Chapter 368, Laws of 2015, sections 38 and 48, Chapter 415, Laws of 2019, section 17, Chapter 456, Laws of 2019, and sections 3 and 4, Chapter 318, Laws of 2021, are repealed. Section 3. Effective dates. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), [this act] is effective on passage and approval. (2) [Section 1] is effective on October 1, 2025.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Montana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Montana statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.