Montana · individual fact

Montana crime

Reported violent and property crime, police reporting coverage, and Montana public-safety context.

Reported violent-crime rate428 per 100k2024 · #14 of 50 · highest first
Reported property-crime rate1,649.4 per 100k2024 · #28 of 50 · highest first
Police population reporting coverage99.9%2024 · #7 of 50 · highest first

Montana over time

Explore Montana readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Montana officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Montana effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Montana change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Reported violent-crime rate Montana · source units
MontanaPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Reported violent-crime rate2024: 428 per 100k335.3 per 100k420.1 per 100k504.9 per 100kMontana, 2015: 351.7 per 100kMontana, 2016: 373.4 per 100kMontana, 2017: 381.1 per 100kMontana, 2018: 382.9 per 100kMontana, 2019: 426.2 per 100kMontana, 2020: 488.5 per 100kMontana, 2021: 475.7 per 100kMontana, 2022: 433.4 per 100kMontana, 2023: 449.5 per 100kMontana, 2024: 428 per 100k201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 33National context · Booker makes federal sentencing guidelines advisory · 2005-01-12Federal sentencingNational context · Adam Walsh Act establishes new registration standards · 2006-07-27Adam Walsh ActNational context · Survey changes disrupt the 2006 victimization comparison · 2006-12-312006 survey breakNational context · Congress strengthens firearm background-check records · 2008-01-08NICS records lawNational context · Second Chance Act expands reentry support · 2008-04-09Second Chance ActNational context · Heller recognizes an individual firearm right · 2008-06-26Heller decisionNational context · Financial crisis deepens during the Great Recession · 2008-09-15Financial crisisNational context · Shepard–Byrd Act expands federal hate-crime law · 2009-10-28Federal hate-crime lawNational context · McDonald applies the firearm right to the states · 2010-06-28McDonald decisionNational context · Fair Sentencing Act changes federal crack penalties · 2010-08-03Fair Sentencing ActNational context · FBI expands the rape definition · 2013-01-01Rape definition expandsNational context · Violence Against Women Act reauthorized · 2013-03-07VAWA reauthorizationNational context · DOJ publishes Ferguson policing findings · 2015-03-04Ferguson investigationNational context · Murder rates rise in 2015 and 2016 · 2016-12-312015–2016 murder riseNational context · First Step Act enacted · 2018-12-21First Step ActNational context · FBI launches national use-of-force data collection · 2019-01-01Use-of-force reportingNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · George Floyd is killed by a Minneapolis police officer · 2020-05-25George Floyd killedNational context · Murder rises sharply while property crime declines · 2020-12-312020 murder surgeNational context · FBI transitions to incident-based reporting · 2021-01-01NIBRS transitionNational context · COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act improves review and reporting · 2021-05-20Hate-crime reportingNational context · Executive order sets federal policing safeguards · 2022-05-25Federal policing orderNational context · Bruen changes the test for firearm restrictions · 2022-06-23Bruen decisionNational context · Bipartisan Safer Communities Act enacted · 2022-06-25Safer Communities ActNational context · FBI annual report again includes summary submissions · 2023-10-16Reporting coverage growsNational context · Vehicle theft rises while total property crime falls · 2023-12-31Vehicle-theft surgeNational context · Victimization survey tests a redesigned questionnaire · 2024-01-01NCVS redesign beginsNational context · Supreme Court rejects ATF’s bump-stock classification · 2024-06-14Bump-stock rulingNational context · Rahimi upholds disarmament for a credible domestic threat · 2024-06-21Domestic-threat rulingNational context · Federal policing executive order is revoked · 2025-01-20Policing order revokedNational context · Court sustains ATF’s rule covering some firearm kits · 2025-03-26Firearm-kit rulingNational context · Executive order redirects federal law-enforcement support · 2025-04-282025 policing policyNational context · FBI publishes 2025 annual crime estimates · 2026-08-142025 crime data release● Montana Legislature · 2● U.S. Congress · Montana delegation · 1◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Montana agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-01-012026-08-31

3 of 3 reviewed Montana actions match · 3 date markers shown. 33 major events shown separately.

Montana · 2024: 428 per 100k · Rank #14 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query. These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Montana's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 98.6% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Montana Reported violent-crime rate · source units
PeriodMontanaRankU.S. benchmark
2024428 per 100k#14 of 50Not available
2023449.5 per 100k#11 of 50Not available
2022433.4 per 100k#17 of 50Not available
2021475.7 per 100k#10 of 50Not available
2020488.5 per 100k#10 of 50Not available
2019426.2 per 100k#16 of 50Not available
2018382.9 per 100k#22 of 50Not available
2017381.1 per 100k#22 of 50Not available
2016373.4 per 100k#25 of 50Not available
2015351.7 per 100k#25 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Montana · state comparison

Reported crime over time

Compare the same calendar year across states. A lower reported rate can reflect fewer crimes, incomplete reporting, or both.

Montana · 2024428 per 100k
Montana rank#14among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Reported violent-crime rate

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred. Montana's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 98.6% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting. Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Montana
Reported violent-crime rate history in Montana331.2 per 100k420.1 per 100k509 per 100k20152024
2024 · Montana: 428 per 100k · Rank #14 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Montana Reported violent-crime rate history
PeriodMontanaCompare
2015351.7 per 100k
2016373.4 per 100k
2017381.1 per 100k
2018382.9 per 100k
2019426.2 per 100k
2020488.5 per 100k
2021475.7 per 100k
2022433.4 per 100k
2023449.5 per 100k
2024428 per 100k

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.

Lower value · 102.6 per 100kHigher value · 744.7 per 100kStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Montana · 428 per 100k2024 · Rank #14 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Reported violent-crime rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Mexico744.7 per 100k—
#2Alaska731.9 per 100k—
#3Tennessee604.3 per 100k—
#4Arkansas589.6 per 100k—
#5*Louisiana504.5 per 100k82.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#6Colorado486.8 per 100k—
#7California478.4 per 100k—
#8Kansas474.7 per 100k—
#9Missouri472.7 per 100k—
#10Michigan442.6 per 100k—
#11South Carolina440.8 per 100k—
#12Arizona433 per 100k—
#13Oklahoma429.3 per 100k—
#14Montana · your comparison428 per 100k—
#15Maryland425.9 per 100k—
#16Nevada408.6 per 100k—
#17Texas397.8 per 100k—
#18New York392.2 per 100k—
#19North Carolina382.9 per 100k—
#20Alabama380.8 per 100k—
#21Delaware368.4 per 100k—
#22*South Dakota356.9 per 100k89.6% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#23*Indiana349.2 per 100k87.2% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#24Oregon341.1 per 100k—
#25Washington331.8 per 100k—
#26Georgia328 per 100k—
#27Massachusetts317.9 per 100k—
#28Ohio311.9 per 100k—
#29Illinois294.5 per 100k—
#30Wisconsin287.6 per 100k—
#31West Virginia263.8 per 100k—
#32*Florida262 per 100k81.0% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#33Minnesota259.4 per 100k—
#34North Dakota258 per 100k—
#35Pennsylvania251.3 per 100k—
#36Iowa247.2 per 100k—
#37Utah237.8 per 100k—
#38Idaho236.6 per 100k—
#39Hawaii230.3 per 100k—
#40Vermont227.1 per 100k—
#41Kentucky226.7 per 100k—
#42Nebraska224.6 per 100k—
#43Virginia223.7 per 100k—
#44New Jersey221.9 per 100k—
#45*Mississippi219.6 per 100k65.1% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#46*Wyoming212.5 per 100k89.9% population coverage; below the 90% threshold.
#47Rhode Island154.9 per 100k—
#48Connecticut139.2 per 100k—
#49New Hampshire112.3 per 100k—
#50Maine102.6 per 100k—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Reported violent-crime rate

428 per 100,0002024

Violent offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Montana's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 98.6% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.9%; this is not complete statewide reporting.

Reported property-crime rate

1,649.4 per 100,0002024

Property offenses reported to law enforcement per 100,000 residents in participating jurisdictions.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

FactVote sums the 12 monthly state offense rates returned by the FBI Crime Data Explorer for each calendar year. The accompanying coverage value is the mean of the 12 monthly population-coverage percentages returned with the same query.

  • These are crimes reported to law enforcement, not all crimes that occurred.
  • Montana's average monthly population coverage remained at or above 98.6% throughout this series, but coverage still varies and does not equal complete statewide reporting.
  • Reporting systems, agency participation, and later revisions can change the published series.
  • Average monthly population coverage in 2024 was 99.9%; this is not complete statewide reporting.
Montana · state comparison

Firearm mortality

Firearm deaths include suicide, homicide, and other intents. Mortality is separate from reported crime.

Montana · 2024247
Montana rank#38among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Firearm deaths

Deaths with firearm injury recorded as the cause, all intents.

Counts reflect population size. They do not measure shootings, crimes, or the effect of a policy.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Montana stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Montana has a dark outline.

Lower value · 55Higher value · 4,389Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Montana · 2472024 · Rank #38 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Montana with every state · 50 ranked
Firearm deaths · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas4,389—
#2Florida3,191—
#3California2,853—
#4Georgia1,985—
#5North Carolina1,835—
#6Ohio1,745—
#7Pennsylvania1,624—
#8Illinois1,563—
#9Tennessee1,448—
#10Arizona1,331—
#11Missouri1,234—
#12Michigan1,228—
#13Alabama1,212—
#14Indiana1,196—
#15Virginia1,153—
#16South Carolina1,064—
#17Louisiana1,031—
#18Colorado961—
#19Washington915—
#20New York896—
#21Kentucky870—
#22Mississippi810—
#23Oklahoma794—
#24Wisconsin735—
#25Maryland716—
#26Oregon663—
#27Arkansas638—
#28Minnesota582—
#28Nevada582—
#30New Mexico563—
#31Utah454—
#32Kansas446—
#33New Jersey393—
#34Iowa389—
#35Idaho331—
#36Massachusetts287—
#37West Virginia281—
#38Montana · your comparison247—
#39Connecticut224—
#40Nebraska218—
#41Alaska182—
#42Maine181—
#43South Dakota159—
#44New Hampshire152—
#45Wyoming143—
#46Delaware123—
#47North Dakota95—
#48Vermont76—
#49Hawaii56—
#50Rhode Island55—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Firearm deaths

2472024 final data

Deaths in which firearm injury was the underlying cause, with the rate age-adjusted per 100,000 residents.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Population-adjusted measure

Age-adjusted firearm death rate
20.2 per 100,000
Method and limitations

CDC National Vital Statistics System death-certificate data.

  • The total combines firearm deaths across intents, including suicide, homicide, legal intervention, and unintentional or undetermined injury.
  • It does not measure nonfatal injuries, firearm ownership, defensive uses, or policy effects.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice from FactVote’s Montana candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

3 statements from 2 candidates

2026 Montana U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Independent · U.S. House District 2 · MT

Policing & criminal justice context

Together with our State and Local leaders, I will work to protect and increase federal funding for these vital services; I will make sure that Montana law enforcement and first responders always have the resources they need.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

Together with our State and Local leaders, I will work to protect and increase federal funding for these vital services; I will make sure that Montana law enforcement and first responders always have the resources they need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Michael D. Eisenhauer — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Montana U.S. Senate — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Alani Bankhead

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. Senate · MT

Policing & criminal justice context

✓ Give law enforcement the tools and funding to fight trafficking and online exploitation.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

✓ Give law enforcement the tools and funding to fight trafficking and online exploitation.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Alani Bankhead
Policing & criminal justice context

✓ Fix the ISDEAA “638” process so the BIA can’t stall or stonewall a tribe that chooses to run its own law enforcement.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Public safety and criminal justice

Candidate campaign source

✓ Fix the ISDEAA “638” process so the BIA can’t stall or stonewall a tribe that chooses to run its own law enforcement.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Alani Bankhead — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific crime, victimization, policing and criminal justice terms in retained, attributed source text from published Montana candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Montana incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Montana legislators and Montana’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Montana’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

3 matching sponsorships or proposals · 3 Montana incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Denise Baum

Montana House of Representatives, District 45 · D–MT

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Denise Baum
Montana Legislature · HB 44

AN ACT REVISING LAWS RELATED TO TAMPERING WITH OR FABRICATING PHYSICAL EVIDENCE; ESTABLISHING A PENALTY FOR TAMPERING WITH OR FABRICATING PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IN CONNECTION WITH A HOMICIDE; AND AMENDING SECTION 45-7-207, MCA

Mar 27, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 24

Rep. Denise Baum · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 44 establishes an enhanced penalty for evidence tampering connected to a homicide or homicide investigation when the tampering affects a coroner’s or medical examiner’s ability to determine cause or manner of death. The maximum is 40 years in prison, a $100,000 fine, or both. This is a justice-response and evidence-integrity connection; it does not make every tampering case a homicide or establish that homicide mortality or reported violent crime fell.

The legislative docket records “Signed by Governor” and chapter 24. The displayed date is the docket timestamp, not an independently verified original execution date. Enactment does not prove implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

The CDC fact measures age-adjusted resident homicide deaths. Penalties for evidence tampering that impairs determination of cause or manner of death concern the investigation of homicide. The tampering offense is not itself a homicide count or proof of fewer deaths. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Montana evidence context: Homicide deaths · Reported violent-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Section 1. Section 45-7-207, MCA, is amended to read: "45-7-207. Tampering with or fabricating physical evidence -- penalties. (1) A person commits the offense of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence if, believing that an official proceeding or investigation is pending or about to be instituted, the person: (a) alters, destroys, conceals, or removes any record, document, or thing with purpose to impair its verity or availability in the proceeding or investigation; or (b) makes, presents, or uses any record, document, or thing knowing it to be false and with purpose to mislead any person who is or may be engaged in the proceeding or investigation. (2) (a) Except as provided in subsection (2)(b), a person convicted of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence shall be imprisoned in the state prison for a term not to exceed 10 years or be fined an amount not to exceed $50,000, or both. (b) A person convicted of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence in connection with a homicide or homicide investigation and who in so doing affected the ability of a coroner or medical examiner to determine either a cause of death or manner of death, or both, shall be imprisoned in the state prison for a term not to exceed 40 years or be fined an amount not to exceed $100,000, or both."
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Barry Usher

Montana Senate, District 19 · R–MT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Barry Usher
Montana Legislature · SB 19

AN ACT GENERALLY REVISING SENTENCING LAWS FOR THEFT, FAILURE TO RETURN RENTED OR LEASED PERSONAL PROPERTY, ISSUING A BAD CHECK, DECEPTIVE PRACTICES, FORGERY, AND THEFT OF IDENTITY; REVISING THE DEFINITION OF COMMON SCHEME; RAISING THE PENALTY THRESHOLDS FOR OFFENSES INVOLVING THEFT, FAILURE TO RETURN RENTED OR LEASED PERSONAL PROPERTY, ISSUING A BAD CHECK, DECEPTIVE PRACTICES, FORGERY, AND THEFT OF IDENTITY; AMENDING SECTIONS 45-2-101, 45-6-301, 45-6-309, 45-6-316, 45-6-317, 45-6-325, 45-6-332, AND 45-6-345, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE

May 13, 2025 · Enacted · Chapter 583

Sen. Barry Usher · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The selected theft provision of SB 19 sets, for a first or second theft of property worth no more than $1,500, a fine up to $1,500, up to six months in county jail, or both, subject to the specified exceptions. A third or subsequent offense carries a $1,500 fine and 30 days to six months in jail. The bill removes the intermediate $1,500-to-$5,000 tier; ordinary theft exceeding $1,500 can carry a fine up to $50,000, up to 10 years in prison, or both. Separate rules cover theft of light vehicles, commonly domesticated hoofed animals, anhydrous ammonia for drug manufacture, and embezzlement exceeding $10,000. Theft amounts under a common scheme or the same transaction may be aggregated. The law specifies July 1, 2025. Only theft components of the FBI property-crime measure are linked; no crime reduction is established.

The legislative docket records “Signed by Governor” and chapter 583. The displayed date is the docket timestamp, not an independently verified original execution date. Enactment does not prove implementation or current enforceability.

Why this record is included

FBI property crime includes larceny-theft, burglary and motor-vehicle theft. The selected theft penalties concern components of that measure. Fraud, identity theft and every offense elsewhere in the bill are not automatically included in this FBI measure. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Montana evidence context: Reported property-crime rate. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

(7) (a) Except as provided in subsections (7)(b) and (7)(d), a person convicted of a first or second offense of the offense of theft of property not exceeding $1,500 in value shall be fined an amount not to exceed $1,500 or be imprisoned in the county jail for a term not to exceed 6 months, or both. A person convicted of a third or subsequent offense shall be fined $1,500 and be imprisoned in the county jail for a term of not less than 30 days or more than 6 months. (b) (i) Except as provided in subsections (7)(c) and (7)(d), a person convicted of the offense of theft of property that exceeds $1,500 in value or the theft of any amount of anhydrous ammonia for the purpose of manufacturing dangerous drugs, shall be fined an amount not to exceed $50,000 or be imprisoned in a state prison for a term not to exceed 10 years, or both. (ii) A person convicted of the theft of any commonly domesticated hoofed animal shall be fined an amount of not less than $5,000 or more than $50,000 or be imprisoned in a state prison for a term not to exceed 10 years, or both. If a prison term is deferred, the court shall order the offender to perform 416 hours of community service during a 1-year period, in the offender's county of residence. In addition to the fine and imprisonment, the offender's property is subject to criminal forfeiture pursuant to 45-6-328 and 45-6-329. (c) A person convicted of the offense of theft of property exceeding $10,000 in value by embezzlement shall be imprisoned in a state prison for a term of not less than 1 year or more than 10 years and may be fined an amount not to exceed $50,000. The court may, in its discretion, place the person on probation with the requirement that restitution be made under terms set by the court. If the terms are not met, the required prison term may be ordered. (d) A person convicted of the offense of theft of property of a light vehicle, as defined in 61-1-101, shall be fined an amount not to exceed $50,000 or be imprisoned in a state prison for a term not to exceed 10 years, or both. (8) Amounts involved in thefts committed pursuant to a common scheme or the same transaction, whether from the same person or several persons, may be aggregated in determining the value of the property. "
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Steve Daines

U.S. Senate, Montana · R–MT

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Steve Daines
U.S. Congress · Montana delegation · S 205

Protecting Individuals with Down Syndrome Act

Jan 23, 2025 · In Congress

Sen. Steve Daines · Sponsored / Sen. Tim Sheehy · Co-sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

S. 205 proposes prohibiting an abortion performed with knowledge that a test, diagnosis or other reason to believe the fetus has or may have Down syndrome is wholly or partly why the woman seeks it. Providers would have to ask about that awareness and, if present, inform the woman of the prohibition. The proposal also prohibits specified coercion, solicitation or acceptance of funds, and knowing cross-border transport for such an abortion. Violations or attempts could carry up to five years in prison, a fine, or both. Medical or mental-health professionals would have to report known or suspected violations, with a separate penalty of up to one year, a fine, or both. Civil remedies and specified plaintiff restrictions apply. The abortion definition excludes the stated life-saving and dead-fetus-removal procedures, and the woman would not be prosecuted or held civilly liable under the section. The bill remains in Congress and establishes no new prohibition or change in Montana procedures.

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. No enactment of this bill is recorded at the review cutoff.

Why this record is included

The fact counts abortions occurring in Montana, including care for nonresidents. Conditions on medication abortions and a proposed Down-syndrome-related prohibition concern subsets of those procedures; they do not establish changes in the number reported. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Montana evidence context: Abortions reported by area of occurrence. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

3.Discrimination by abortion against an unborn child on the basis of Down syndrome prohibited(a)In generalChapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:251.Discrimination by abortion against an unborn child on the basis of Down syndrome prohibited(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)AbortionThe term abortion means the act of using or prescribing any instrument, medicine, drug, or any other substance, device, or means with the intent to—(A)kill the unborn child of a woman known to be pregnant; or(B)terminate the pregnancy of a woman known to be pregnant, with an intention other than—(i)to produce a live birth and preserve the life and health of the child born alive;(ii)to save the life of the pregnant woman; or(iii)to remove a dead unborn child.(2)Down syndromeThe term Down syndrome means a chromosomal disorder associated with—(A)an extra copy of the chromosome 21, in whole or in part; or(B)an effective trisomy for chromosome 21.(3)Qualified plaintiffThe term qualified plaintiff means—(A)a woman upon whom an abortion is performed or attempted in violation of this section;(B)a maternal grandparent of the unborn child if the woman upon whom an abortion is performed or attempted in violation of this section is an unemancipated minor;(C)the father of an unborn child who is the subject of an abortion performed or attempted in violation of this section unless the pregnancy or abortion resulted from the criminal conduct of the father; or(D)the Attorney General.(4)Unborn childThe term unborn child means an individual of the species homo sapiens from the beginning of the biological development of that individual, including fertilization, until the point of being born alive, as defined in section 8(b) of title 1.(b)OffenseIt shall be unlawful to—(1)perform an abortion—(A)with the knowledge that a pregnant woman is seeking an abortion, in whole or in part, on the basis of—(i)a test result indicating that the unborn child has Down syndrome;(ii)a prenatal diagnosis that the unborn child has Down syndrome; or(iii)any other reason to believe that the unborn child has or may have Down syndrome; or(B)without first—(i)asking the pregnant woman if she is aware of any test results, prenatal diagnosis, or any other evidence that the unborn child has or may have Down syndrome; and(ii)if the woman is aware that the unborn child has or may have Down syndrome, informing the pregnant woman of the prohibitions on abortion under this section;(2)use force or the threat of force to intentionally injure or intimidate any person for the purpose of coercing an abortion described in paragraph (1)(A);(3)solicit or accept funds for the performance of an abortion described in paragraph (1)(A); or(4)knowingly transport a woman into the United States or across a State line for the purpose of obtaining an abortion described in paragraph (1)(A).(c)Criminal penaltyAny person that violates, or attempts to violate, subsection (b) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.(d)Civil remedies(1)Civil action by woman on whom abortion is performedA woman upon whom an abortion has been performed or attempted in violation of subsection (b)(2) may bring a civil action in an appropriate court against any person who engaged in a violation of subsection (b)(2) to obtain appropriate relief.(2)Civil action by relatives(A)In generalExcept as provided in subparagraph (B), the father of an unborn child who is the subject of an abortion performed or attempted in violation of subsection (b), or a maternal grandparent of the unborn child if the pregnant woman is an unemancipated minor, may bring a civil action in an appropriate court against any person who engaged in the violation to obtain appropriate relief.(B)ExceptionsSubparagraph (A) shall not apply if—(i)the pregnancy or abortion resulted from the criminal conduct of the plaintiff described in subparagraph (A); or(ii)the plaintiff described in subparagraph (A) consented to the abortion.(3)Appropriate reliefAppropriate relief in a civil action under this subsection includes—(A)objectively verifiable money damages for all injuries, psychological and physical, including loss of companionship and support, occasioned by the violation of this section; and(B)punitive damages.(4)Injunctive reliefA qualified plaintiff may bring a civil action in an appropriate court to obtain injunctive relief to prevent an abortion provider from performing or attempting further abortions in violation of this section.(5)Attorney’s fees for plaintiffThe court shall award a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs to a prevailing plaintiff in a civil action under this subsection.(e)Bar to prosecutionA woman upon whom an abortion is performed may not be prosecuted or held civilly liable for any violation of this section or for a conspiracy to violate this section.(f)Loss of Federal fundingA violation of subsection (b) shall be deemed discrimination for the purposes of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794).(g)Reporting requirement(1)In generalA physician, physician’s assistant, nurse, counselor, or other medical or mental health professional shall report known or suspected violations of any of this section to appropriate law enforcement authorities.(2)Criminal penaltyAny person who violates paragraph (1) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.(h)Expedited considerationIt shall be the duty of the district courts of the United States, the courts of appeals of the United States, and the Supreme Court of the United States to advance on the docket and to expedite to the greatest possible extent the disposition of any matter brought under this section.(i)Protection of privacy in court proceedings(1)In generalExcept to the extent the Constitution of the United States or other similarly compelling reason requires, in every civil or criminal action under this section, the court shall make such orders as are necessary to protect the anonymity of any woman upon whom an abortion has been performed or attempted if she does not give her written consent to such disclosure. Such orders may be made upon motion, but shall be made sua sponte if not otherwise sought by a party.(2)Orders to parties, witnesses, and counselThe court shall issue appropriate orders to the parties, witnesses, and counsel and shall direct the sealing of the record and exclusion of individuals from courtrooms or hearing rooms to the extent necessary to safeguard the identity of a woman described in paragraph (1) from public disclosure.(3)Pseudonym requiredIn the absence of written consent of the woman upon whom an abortion has been performed or attempted, any party, other than a public official, who brings an action under this section shall do so under a pseudonym.(4)LimitationThis subsection may not be construed to conceal the identity of the plaintiff or of witnesses from the defendant or from attorneys for the defendant.(j)Rule of construction(1)Greater protectionNothing in this section may be construed to pre-empt or limit any Federal, State or local law that provides greater protections for an unborn child than those provided in this section.(2)Creating or recognizing rightNothing in this section shall be construed as creating or recognizing a right to abortion nor shall it make lawful an abortion that is otherwise unlawful under Federal, State, or local law..(b)Clerical amendmentThe table of sections of chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:251. Discrimination by abortion against an unborn child on the basis of Down syndrome prohibited..4.SeverabilityIf any portion of this Act, or the amendments made by this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the portions or applications of this Act which can be given effect without the invalid portion or application.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Montana officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Montana statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.