Missouri · individual fact

Missouri real gross domestic product

Missouri’s inflation-adjusted economic output, annual growth, industry structure, and employment context.

Real GDP$362.46B2025 · #22 of 50 · highest first
Annual real GDP growth1.2%2025 · #42 of 50 · highest first
Current-dollar GDP$475.38B2025 · #22 of 50 · highest first

Missouri over time

Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Real GDP Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Real GDP2025: $362.46B$0$13.39T$26.78TMissouri, 2014: $303.62BMissouri, 2015: $308.01BMissouri, 2016: $308.42BMissouri, 2017: $311.27BMissouri, 2018: $314.15BMissouri, 2019: $321.27BMissouri, 2020: $316.54BMissouri, 2021: $331.94BMissouri, 2022: $337.79BMissouri, 2023: $349.41BMissouri, 2024: $358.07BMissouri, 2025: $362.46B201420192025
✦ Major events & context · 29National context · Hurricanes Katrina and Rita · 2005-08-29Katrina and RitaNational context · Great Financial Crisis and Great Recession · 2008-09-15Great Financial CrisisNational context · Federal Reserve moves rates close to zero · 2008-12-16Fed near-zero ratesNational context · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act · 2009-02-17Recovery ActNational context · Japan disaster disrupts U.S. auto production · 2011-05-17Japan / auto supplyNational context · Midwest drought reduces farm output · 2012-09-27Drought / farm outputNational context · Automatic federal spending cuts begin · 2013-03-01Federal spending cutsNational context · 2013 federal government shutdown · 2013-10-012013 shutdownNational context · Oil-price decline cuts drilling investment · 2015-02-24Oil investment downturnNational context · Hurricanes Harvey and Irma disrupt activity · 2017-08-25Harvey and IrmaNational context · 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act · 2017-12-222017 tax lawNational context · U.S.–China tariff escalation · 2018-07-06U.S.–China tariffsNational context · 2018–19 federal government shutdown · 2018-12-222018–19 shutdownNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2019 rate cuts · 2019-07-312019 Fed rate cutsNational context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Emergency rate cuts and asset purchases · 2020-03-15Fed emergency supportNational context · CARES Act pandemic relief · 2020-03-27CARES Act reliefNational context · American Rescue Plan · 2021-03-11American Rescue PlanNational context · Reopening recovery meets supply bottlenecks · 2021-07-09Reopening / shortagesNational context · Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act · 2021-11-15Infrastructure lawNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increasesNational context · Semiconductor and energy investment incentives · 2022-08-16CHIPS / energy incentivesNational context · Banking stress and credit conditions · 2023-03-22Banking / credit stressNational context · Federal Reserve begins 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-182024 Fed rate cutsNational context · Broad U.S. tariffs and volatile trade flows · 2025-04-02Tariffs / trade timingNational context · 2025 tax and spending reconciliation law · 2025-07-042025 tax / spending lawNational context · 2025 shutdown reduces federal services · 2025-10-012025 shutdownNational context · Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption · 2026-02-28Iran / Hormuz disruption● Missouri Legislature · 9● U.S. Congress · Missouri delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.■ Missouri agencies · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.2005-08-012026-05-31

9 of 9 reviewed Missouri actions match · 9 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.

Missouri · 2025: $362.46B · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars. Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Missouri Real GDP · source units
PeriodMissouriRankU.S. benchmark
2025$362.46B#22 of 50$23.94T
2024$358.07B#22 of 50$23.39T
2023$349.41B#22 of 50$22.72T
2022$337.79B#22 of 50$22.08T
2021$331.94B#22 of 50$21.56T
2020$316.54B#22 of 50$20.28T
2019$321.27B#22 of 50$20.72T
2018$314.15B#22 of 50$20.19T
2017$311.27B#22 of 50$19.61T
2016$308.42B#22 of 50$19.14T
2015$308.01B#22 of 50$18.8T
2014$303.62B#21 of 50$18.26T
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Missouri · state comparison

Missouri output and growth

Annual real GDP removes price changes. Annual growth compares annual levels; it is separate from an annualized quarterly growth rate.

Missouri · 2025$362.46B
Missouri rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$23.94TSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Real GDP

Total value added produced in the state in millions of chained 2017 dollars.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Real GDP history in Missouri$-3.24T$12.12T$27.49T20142025
2025 · Missouri: $362.46B · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $23.94T · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Real GDP history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2014$303.62B
2015$308.01B
2016$308.42B
2017$311.27B
2018$314.15B
2019$321.27B
2020$316.54B
2021$331.94B
2022$337.79B
2023$349.41B
2024$358.07B
2025$362.46B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $38.06BHigher value · $3.43TStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $362.46B2025 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Real GDP · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$3.43T—
#2Texas$2.33T—
#3New York$1.89T—
#4Florida$1.38T—
#5Illinois$948.03B—
#6Pennsylvania$815.87B—
#7Ohio$738.49B—
#8Georgia$719.74B—
#9Washington$715.88B—
#10New Jersey$688.76B—
#11North Carolina$682.83B—
#12Massachusetts$640.79B—
#13Virginia$631.98B—
#14Michigan$575.4B—
#15Colorado$452.78B—
#16Arizona$451.49B—
#17Tennessee$447.66B—
#18Maryland$437.37B—
#19Indiana$422.47B—
#20Minnesota$392.31B—
#21Wisconsin$363.84B—
#22Missouri · your comparison$362.46B—
#23Connecticut$297.35B—
#24South Carolina$287.16B—
#25Oregon$264.75B—
#26Louisiana$263.89B—
#27Alabama$259.46B—
#28Utah$243.04B—
#29Kentucky$239.51B—
#30Oklahoma$216.31B—
#31Nevada$210.1B—
#32Iowa$204.86B—
#33Kansas$178.51B—
#34Nebraska$156.61B—
#35Arkansas$147.93B—
#36Mississippi$123.37B—
#37New Mexico$122.58B—
#38Idaho$103.62B—
#39New Hampshire$99.06B—
#40Hawaii$93.38B—
#41Delaware$89.92B—
#42West Virginia$84.94B—
#43Maine$77.23B—
#44Rhode Island$67.25B—
#45North Dakota$65.27B—
#46Montana$61.08B—
#47South Dakota$59.87B—
#48Alaska$56.34B—
#49Wyoming$40.16B—
#50Vermont$38.06B—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

What makes up Missouri GDP?

Choose an industry to compare Missouri’s output with every state. Nominal industry values can be added within a year.

Missouri · 2025$5.71B
Missouri rank#16among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$255.93BSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output

Industry value added, current dollars. The broad industries listed form an exhaustive partition of total GDP.

A large industry output rank can reflect the size of the state. Chained-dollar components should not be added.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history in Missouri$-40.53B$148.25B$337.04B20142025
2025 · Missouri: $5.71B · Rank #16 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $255.93B · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output history
PeriodMissouriCompare
2014$5.19B
2015$3.19B
2016$3.35B
2017$3.43B
2018$3.03B
2019$3.1B
2020$3.3B
2021$4.84B
2022$6.99B
2023$6.56B
2024$5.53B
2025$5.71B

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · $164.2MHigher value · $50.67BStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · $5.71B2025 · Rank #16 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting · output · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California$50.67B—
#2Texas$16.95B—
#3Iowa$14.1B—
#4Nebraska$10.6B—
#5Illinois$9.52B—
#6Florida$8.33B—
#7Washington$8.05B—
#8Minnesota$8.01B—
#9Indiana$7.13B—
#10South Dakota$7.08B—
#11Kansas$7.02B—
#12Ohio$7B—
#13Wisconsin$6.58B—
#14Oregon$6.18B—
#15Michigan$6.02B—
#16Missouri · your comparison$5.71B—
#17North Carolina$5.55B—
#18Idaho$5.41B—
#19Pennsylvania$4.97B—
#20North Dakota$4.71B—
#21Georgia$4.53B—
#22Oklahoma$4.26B—
#23Arkansas$4.13B—
#24Kentucky$3.75B—
#25New York$3.55B—
#26Alabama$3.29B—
#27Mississippi$2.99B—
#28Colorado$2.98B—
#29Arizona$2.85B—
#30Montana$2.49B—
#31Louisiana$2.42B—
#32Virginia$2.37B—
#33Tennessee$2.01B—
#34New Mexico$1.7B—
#35South Carolina$1.63B—
#36Utah$1.59B—
#37Maryland$1.31B—
#38New Jersey$1.27B—
#39Maine$1.2B—
#40Wyoming$888.5M—
#41Massachusetts$869.6M—
#42Delaware$741.1M—
#43West Virginia$561.8M—
#44Hawaii$553.9M—
#45Nevada$551.2M—
#46Vermont$536.1M—
#47Alaska$488.1M—
#48Connecticut$341.8M—
#49New Hampshire$320.1M—
#50Rhode Island$164.2M—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Missouri · state comparison

Does growth translate into more work?

BEA’s total employment counts jobs, including proprietors, rather than distinct people.

Missouri · 20253,998,549
Missouri rank#20among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark218,324,700Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Total employment · jobs

BEA annual total full-time and part-time employment, including proprietors. One person can hold multiple jobs.

Separate from residence-based civilian employment in BLS LAUS and from nonfarm payroll employment.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Missouri
Total employment · jobs history in Missouri-28,611,178110,961,275250,533,72820142025
2025 · Missouri: 3,998,549 · Rank #20 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 218,324,700 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Missouri Total employment · jobs history
PeriodMissouriCompare
20143,597,850
20153,657,571
20163,702,996
20173,739,052
20183,782,230
20193,785,548
20203,700,665
20213,804,026
20223,893,093
20233,961,242
20243,995,311
20253,998,549

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.

Lower value · 439,349Higher value · 25,407,891Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Missouri · 3,998,5492025 · Rank #20 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Total employment · jobs · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California25,407,891—
#2Texas20,639,097—
#3Florida15,174,955—
#4New York13,498,360—
#5Illinois8,197,037—
#6Pennsylvania8,150,272—
#7Ohio7,394,537—
#8Georgia7,184,433—
#9North Carolina6,864,520—
#10New Jersey6,095,348—
#11Michigan5,946,187—
#12Virginia5,789,397—
#13Massachusetts5,020,627—
#14Washington4,879,224—
#15Tennessee4,633,711—
#16Arizona4,455,141—
#17Colorado4,231,488—
#18Indiana4,213,622—
#19Maryland4,009,451—
#20Missouri · your comparison3,998,549—
#21Minnesota3,914,167—
#22Wisconsin3,855,203—
#23South Carolina3,245,739—
#24Alabama2,966,686—
#25Louisiana2,831,737—
#26Kentucky2,718,290—
#27Oregon2,671,758—
#28Oklahoma2,466,719—
#29Utah2,458,247—
#30Connecticut2,424,541—
#31Nevada2,163,825—
#32Iowa2,122,389—
#33Kansas2,007,083—
#34Arkansas1,811,561—
#35Mississippi1,713,294—
#36Nebraska1,410,465—
#37Idaho1,238,642—
#38New Mexico1,183,906—
#39New Hampshire942,254—
#40Hawaii925,451—
#41West Virginia910,570—
#42Maine898,379—
#43Montana761,061—
#44Rhode Island690,505—
#45Delaware678,218—
#46South Dakota665,420—
#47North Dakota605,276—
#48Alaska472,008—
#49Wyoming451,906—
#50Vermont439,349—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about GDP, economic growth and production from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

4 statements from 3 candidates

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Wesley Bell

2 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MO

Economic growth & production context

St. Louis should be one of America's premier transportation hubs, and it’s imperative that our flagship airport matches the growth that this district deserves. Wesley helped bring home millions of dollars in federal support to modernize St. Louis Lambert International Airport. These upgrades will ke…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Modernizing Lambert Airport.

Candidate campaign source

St. Louis should be one of America's premier transportation hubs, and it’s imperative that our flagship airport matches the growth that this district deserves. Wesley helped bring home millions of dollars in federal support to modernize St. Louis Lambert International Airport. These upgrades will keep flights on schedule, grow our economy, protect our environment, and better connect our great city and state to the rest of the country and the world.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Wesley Bell
Economic growth & production context

Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our eco…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Delivering Environmental Justice.

Candidate campaign source

Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality. Wesley believes that confronting the climate crisis and growing our economy are not in conflict. The transition to clean energy should create good-paying union jobs right here in the First District. He has fought to protect clean air and water standards, hold polluters accountable, and ensure that the federal government lives up to its obligations to communities like those along Coldwater Creek and the Westlake Landfill that have suffered from decades of environmental neglect and contamination.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Wesley Bell — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 4 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Jordan Herrera

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 4 · MO

Economic growth & production context

Rebuilding munitions stockpiles with realistic timelines and domestic production capacity

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Foreign Policy and National Security

Candidate campaign source

Rebuilding munitions stockpiles with realistic timelines and domestic production capacity

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jordan Herrera — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗

2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 6 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Chris Stigall

1 statement

Republican · U.S. House District 6 · MO

Economic growth & production context

Families, farmers, and small businesses deserve tax relief - not bigger government. I support making President Trump's tax cuts permanent and will fight against any effort to raise taxes on hardworking Americans. Lower taxes mean more jobs, stronger economic growth, and greater opportunity for North…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Rural Healthcare

Candidate campaign source

Families, farmers, and small businesses deserve tax relief - not bigger government. I support making President Trump's tax cuts permanent and will fight against any effort to raise taxes on hardworking Americans. Lower taxes mean more jobs, stronger economic growth, and greater opportunity for North Missouri families.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Chris Stigall — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
How statements are selected

This section matches specific GDP, economic growth and production terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Missouri incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

9 matching sponsorships or proposals · 4 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Greg Sharpe

Missouri House of Representatives, District 4 · R–MO

6 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Greg Sharpe
Missouri Legislature · HB 1715

Establishes tax incentives in relation to workforce and disaster recovery housing

May 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Greg Sharpe · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 1715 -- WORKFORCE HOUSING TAX INCENTIVES SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Workforce Housing Tax Incentives Program" within the Department of Economic Development. To be eligible for the Program, proposed housing projects must meet at least one of three specified dwelling unit minimums; projects consist of three types of rehabilitation and two project types that relate to greenfield sites. The maximum aggregate amount of tax incentives for a housing project is $1 million. If a housing business qualifies for a higher amount than is allowed, the Department and business can negotiate an apportionment of the reduction in tax incentives between the sales tax refund and the housing…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 1715 -- WORKFORCE HOUSING TAX INCENTIVES SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Workforce Housing Tax Incentives Program" within the Department of Economic Development. To be eligible for the Program, proposed housing projects must meet at least one of three specified dwelling unit minimums; projects consist of three types of rehabilitation and two project types that relate to greenfield sites. The maximum aggregate amount of tax incentives for a housing project is $1 million. If a housing business qualifies for a higher amount than is allowed, the Department and business can negotiate an apportionment of the reduction in tax incentives between the sales tax refund and the housing investment tax credits as long as the total aggregate amount of incentives does not exceed the amount set by the bill. The incentives must be issued on a first-come, first-served basis until the maximum amount of incentives is reached.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 1716

Creates an opportunity for entities to establish a workforce housing investment fund

Mar 3, 2026 · Did not pass

Rep. Greg Sharpe · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HB 1716 -- RURAL WORKFORCE HOUSING SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Economic Development by a vote of 13 to 0 with 1 member voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1716. This bill establishes the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act". A workforce housing grant program is created in the Department of Economic Development (DED) to foster and support the development of workforce housing in rural communities. A nonprofit development organization can apply to DED for approval of a workforce housing grant for a workforce housing investment fund. Grants will be awarded on a competitive…

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-03-03: HCS Reported Do Pass (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HB 1716 -- RURAL WORKFORCE HOUSING SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Economic Development by a vote of 13 to 0 with 1 member voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1716. This bill establishes the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act". A workforce housing grant program is created in the Department of Economic Development (DED) to foster and support the development of workforce housing in rural communities. A nonprofit development organization can apply to DED for approval of a workforce housing grant for a workforce housing investment fund. Grants will be awarded on a competitive basis through 2029. (3) A community or region that exhibits a demonstrated commitment to growing its housing stock; (4) Projects that can reasonably be ready for occupancy in a period of 24 months; and (5) A demonstrated ability to grow and manage a workforce housing investment fund. A nonprofit development organization must: (1) Invest or intend to invest in workforce housing eligible activities; (2) Use any fees, interest, loan repayments, or other funds it receives as a result of the administration of the grant to support qualified activities; and (3) Have an active board of directors with expertise in development, construction, and finance that meets at least quarterly to approve all qualified investments made by the nonprofit development organization. A nonprofit development organization must have a formal plan and proven expertise to invest unused workforce housing investment fund balances and must have an annual audit of all financial records conducted by an independent certified public accountant. This bill creates the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Fund". The Fund will consist of moneys appropriated to the Fund by the General Assembly and the State Treasurer will be the custodian of the Fund. In the event that a nonprofit development organization fails to engage in the initial qualified activity within 24 months after receiving grant funding, the funds must be returned to DED for credit to the Rural Workforce Housing Investment Fund. If a nonprofit development organization fails to allocate any remaining initial grant funding within 24 months after engaging in initial qualified activity, the unallocated funds will be returned to DED for credit to the Rural Workforce Housing Investment Fund. The Director of DED will have discretion to transfer any unused funds to any qualifying trust or fund before August 28, 2031. Beginning August 28, 2031, any funds held by DED and not designated by the Director to be disbursed to an alternate fund will be transferred to the Missouri housing trust fund. Each nonprofit must submit an annual report to the Director of DED. The annual report must include the following: (1) The name and geographical location of the reporting nonprofit development organization; (2) The number, amount, and type of workforce housing investment funds invested in qualified activities; (3) The number, geographical location, type, and amount of investments made; (4) A summary of matching funds and where the matching funds were generated; and (5) The results of the annual audit. If a nonprofit development organization ceases administration of a Workforce Housing Investment Fund, it must file a final report. If a nonprofit fails to file a complete annual report by February 15th, the Director can impose a civil penalty of $5,000 for the violation. The DED must also be expected to commit itself to: (1) Ensure that grant funds awarded to nonprofit development organizations are targeted to the geographic communities or regions with the most pressing economic and employment needs; and (2) Ensure that the allocation of grant funds provides equitable access to the benefits provided in the bill to all eligible geographical areas. The Department must submit an annual report to the General Assembly and the Governor that includes: (1) The number and geographical location of nonprofit development organizations establishing workforce housing investment funds; (2) The number, amount, and type of workforce housing investment funds invested in qualified activities; and (3) The number, geographical location, type, and amount of investments made by each nonprofit development organization. This bill is similar to HB 245 (2025).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 240

Establishes tax incentives in relation to workforce and disaster recovery housing

May 15, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Greg Sharpe · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 240 -- WORKFORCE AND DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Workforce Housing Tax Incentives Program" within the Department of Economic Development. To be eligible for the program, proposed housing projects must meet at least one of three specified dwelling unit minimums; projects consist of three types of rehabilitation and two project types that relate to greenfield sites. The maximum aggregate amount of tax incentives for a housing project is $1 million. If a housing business qualifies for a higher amount than is allowed, the Department and business may negotiate an apportionment of the reduction in tax incentives between the sales tax refund and the…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 240 -- WORKFORCE AND DISASTER RECOVERY HOUSING SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Workforce Housing Tax Incentives Program" within the Department of Economic Development. To be eligible for the program, proposed housing projects must meet at least one of three specified dwelling unit minimums; projects consist of three types of rehabilitation and two project types that relate to greenfield sites. The maximum aggregate amount of tax incentives for a housing project is $1 million. If a housing business qualifies for a higher amount than is allowed, the Department and business may negotiate an apportionment of the reduction in tax incentives between the sales tax refund and the housing investment tax credits as long as the total aggregate amount of incentives does not exceed the amount set by the bill. The incentives must be issued on a first-come, first-served basis until the maximum amount of incentives is reached.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 245

Creates an opportunity for entities to establish a workforce housing investment fund

May 6, 2025 · Did not pass

Rep. Greg Sharpe · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 245 -- RURAL WORKFORCE HOUSING SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act". A workforce housing grant program is created in the Department of Economic Development (DED) to foster and support the development of workforce housing in rural communities. A nonprofit development organization may apply to DED for approval of a workforce housing grant for a workforce housing investment fund. Grants will be awarded on a competitive basis through 2027. (3) A community or region that exhibits a demonstrated commitment to growing its housing stock; (4) Projects that can reasonably be ready for occupancy in a period of 24 months; and (5) A demonstrated…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-06: Dropped from Calendar - Pursuant to House Rules (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 245 -- RURAL WORKFORCE HOUSING SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act". A workforce housing grant program is created in the Department of Economic Development (DED) to foster and support the development of workforce housing in rural communities. A nonprofit development organization may apply to DED for approval of a workforce housing grant for a workforce housing investment fund. Grants will be awarded on a competitive basis through 2027. (3) A community or region that exhibits a demonstrated commitment to growing its housing stock; (4) Projects that can reasonably be ready for occupancy in a period of 24 months; and (5) A demonstrated ability to grow and manage a workforce housing investment fund. A nonprofit development organization must: (1) Invest or intend to invest in workforce housing eligible activities; (2) Use any fees, interest, loan repayments, or other funds it receives as a result of the administration of the grant to support qualified activities; and (3) Have an active board of directors with expertise in development, construction, and finance that meets at least quarterly to approve all qualified investments made by the nonprofit development organization. A nonprofit development organization must have a formal plan and proven expertise to invest unused workforce housing investment fund balances and must have an annual audit of all financial records conducted by an independent certified public accountant. This bill creates the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Fund". In the event that a nonprofit development organization fails to engage in the initial qualified activity within 24 months after receiving grant funding, the funds must be returned to DED for credit to the Rural Workforce Housing Investment Fund. If a nonprofit development organization fails to allocate any remaining initial grant funding within 24 months after engaging in initial qualified activity, the unallocated funds will be returned to DED for credit to the Rural Workforce Housing Investment Fund. The Director of DED will have discretion to transfer any unused funds to any qualifying trust or fund before August 28, 2030. Beginning August 28, 2030, any funds held by DED and not designated by the Director to be disbursed to an alternate fund will be transferred to the Missouri Housing Trust Fund. Each nonprofit must submit an annual report to the Director of DED. The annual report must include the following: (1) The name and geographical location of the reporting nonprofit development organization; (2) The number, amount, and type of workforce housing investment funds invested in qualified activities; (3) The number, geographical location, type, and amount of investments made; (4) A summary of matching funds and where the matching funds were generated; and (5) The results of the annual audit. If a nonprofit development organization ceases administration of a Workforce Housing Investment Fund, it must file a final report. If a nonprofit fails to file a complete annual report by February 15th, the Director may impose a civil penalty of $5,000 for the violation. The DED must also be expected to commit itself to: (1) Ensure that grant funds awarded to nonprofit development organizations are targeted to the geographic communities or regions with the most pressing economic and employment needs; and (2) Ensure that the allocation of grant funds provides equitable access to the benefits provided in the bill to all eligible geographical areas. The Department must submit an annual report to the General Assembly and the Governor that includes: (1) The number and geographical location of nonprofit development organizations establishing workforce housing investment funds; (2) The number, amount, and type of workforce housing investment funds invested in qualified activities; and (3) The number, geographical location, type, and amount of investments made by each nonprofit development organization. This bill is the same as HB 2240 (2024).
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2240

Creates an opportunity for entities to establish a workforce housing investment fund

May 9, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Greg Sharpe · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2240 -- RURAL WORKFORCE HOUSING (Sharpe (4)) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Rural Community Development This bill establishes the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act". A workforce housing grant program shall be created in the Department of Economic Development (DED) to foster and support the development of workforce housing in rural communities. Nonprofit development organizations may apply to DED for approval of a workforce housing grant for a workforce housing investment fund. Grants shall be awarded on a competitive basis through 2027. (3) A community or region that exhibits a demonstrated commitment to growing its housing stock; (4) Projects that can reasonably be…

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-09: Reported Do Pass (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2240 -- RURAL WORKFORCE HOUSING (Sharpe (4)) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Rural Community Development This bill establishes the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act". A workforce housing grant program shall be created in the Department of Economic Development (DED) to foster and support the development of workforce housing in rural communities. Nonprofit development organizations may apply to DED for approval of a workforce housing grant for a workforce housing investment fund. Grants shall be awarded on a competitive basis through 2027. (3) A community or region that exhibits a demonstrated commitment to growing its housing stock; (4) Projects that can reasonably be ready for occupancy in a period of 24 months; and (5) A demonstrated ability to grow and manage a workforce housing investment fund. A nonprofit development organization shall: (1) Invest or intend to invest in workforce housing eligible activities; (2) Use any fees, interest, loan repayments, or other funds it receives as a result of the administration of the grant to support qualified activities; and (3) Have an active board of directors with expertise in development, construction, and finance that meets at least quarterly to approve all qualified investments made by the nonprofit development organization. A nonprofit development organization shall have a formal plan and proven expertise to invest unused workforce housing investment fund balances and shall have an annual audit of all financial records conducted by an independent certified public accountant. This bill creates the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Fund". In the event that a nonprofit development organization fails to engage in activity within 24 months after receiving grant funding, such funds shall be returned to DED for credit to the Missouri Housing Trust Fund. If a nonprofit development organization fails to allocate any remaining grant funding within 24 months after engaging in initial qualified activity, such unallocated funds shall be returned to DED for credit to the Rural Workforce Housing Investment Fund. The Director of DED shall have discretion to transfer any unused Funds to any qualifying trust or fund before August 28, 2029. Beginning August 28, 2029, any funds held by DED and not designated by the Director to be disbursed to an alternate fund shall be transferred to the Missouri Housing Trust Fund. Each nonprofit shall submit an annual report to the Director of DED. Such annual report shall include the following: (1) The name and geographical location of the reporting nonprofit development organization; (2) The number, amount, and type of workforce housing investment funds invested in qualified activities; (3) The number, geographical location, type, and amount of investments made; (4) A summary of matching funds and where such matching funds were generated; and (5) The results of the annual audit. If a nonprofit development organization ceases administration of a Workforce Housing Investment Fund, it shall file a final report. If a nonprofit fails to file a complete annual report by February 15th, the Director may impose a civil penalty of $5,000 for such a violation. The DED must also be expected to commit itself to: (1) Ensure that grant funds awarded to nonprofit development organizations are targeted to the geographic communities or regions with the most pressing economic and employment needs; and (2) Ensure that the allocation of grant funds provides equitable access to the benefits provided in the bill to all eligible geographical areas; The Department shall submit an annual report to the General Assembly and the Governor that includes: (1) The number and geographical location of nonprofit development organizations establishing workforce housing investment funds; (2) The number, amount, and type of workforce housing investment funds invested in qualified activities; and (3) The number, geographical location, type, and amount of investments made by each nonprofit development organization.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Missouri Legislature · HB 2407

Establishes tax incentives in relation to workforce and disaster recovery housing

Feb 12, 2024 · Did not pass

Rep. Greg Sharpe · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HB 2407 -- WORKFORCE HOUSING TAX INCENTIVE SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Workforce Housing Tax Incentives Program" within the Department of Economic Development. The Program defines significant terms, which include "brownfield" and "greenfield" sites and different types of communities and housing projects (Section 620.2022, RSMo.). The maximum aggregate amount of tax incentives for a housing project is $1 million. If a housing business qualifies for a higher amount than is allowed, the Department and business may negotiate an apportionment of the reduction in tax incentives between the sales tax refund and the housing investment tax credits as long as the total aggregate…

This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-02-12: Voted Do Pass (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HB 2407 -- WORKFORCE HOUSING TAX INCENTIVE SPONSOR: Sharpe (4) This bill establishes the "Workforce Housing Tax Incentives Program" within the Department of Economic Development. The Program defines significant terms, which include "brownfield" and "greenfield" sites and different types of communities and housing projects (Section 620.2022, RSMo.). The maximum aggregate amount of tax incentives for a housing project is $1 million. If a housing business qualifies for a higher amount than is allowed, the Department and business may negotiate an apportionment of the reduction in tax incentives between the sales tax refund and the housing investment tax credits as long as the total aggregate amount of incentives does not exceed amount set by the bill. The incentives must be issued on a first-come, first-served basis until the maximum amount of incentives is reached.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Louis Riggs

Missouri House of Representatives, District 5 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Louis Riggs
Missouri Legislature · HB 921

Changes the laws regarding the Missouri Housing Development Commission by setting a preference for former school buildings as housing development sites

Apr 20, 2021 · Did not pass

Rep. Louis Riggs · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

HCS HB 921 -- HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SPONSOR: Riggs COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Economic Development by a vote of 9 to 0. Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Rules- Legislative Oversight by a vote of 10 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 921. This bill requires that in agreements with the Missouri Housing Development Commission or if granting state funds, tax credits, or financing or assistance under Sections 215.010 to 215.250, RSMo., the Commission will require that, all other factors being equal, former school buildings be given preference for development. The following is a summary of the…

This measure did not pass before the 2021 session ended. Final recorded action on 2021-04-20: Reported Do Pass (H).

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

HCS HB 921 -- HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SPONSOR: Riggs COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Economic Development by a vote of 9 to 0. Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Rules- Legislative Oversight by a vote of 10 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 921. This bill requires that in agreements with the Missouri Housing Development Commission or if granting state funds, tax credits, or financing or assistance under Sections 215.010 to 215.250, RSMo., the Commission will require that, all other factors being equal, former school buildings be given preference for development. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. David Gregory

Missouri Senate, District 15 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. David Gregory
Missouri Legislature · SB 1070

Creates provisions relating to illegal aliens

Jan 15, 2026 · Did not pass

Sen. David Gregory · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Any appropriation distributed to a municipality for a redevelopment project found to be in violation of this prohibition shall be recaptured by the Department of Economic Development. ELIGIBILITY FOR PUBLIC BENEFITS (Section 208.009) The act creates new eligibility verification requirements for public benefits, specifically including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Mo HealthNet. Specifically, only people who are United States citizens, United States Nationals, or meet the definition of an eligible alien and qualified alien under federal law are eligible for public benefits.

This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-01-15: Second Read and Referred S General Laws Committee.

Why this record is included

The record addresses eligibility, enrollment, or affordability of health coverage, relevant to the share of people under 65 without insurance. A service-specific benefit or provider-payment rule alone is not a change in insured status. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Any appropriation distributed to a municipality for a redevelopment project found to be in violation of this prohibition shall be recaptured by the Department of Economic Development. ELIGIBILITY FOR PUBLIC BENEFITS (Section 208.009) The act creates new eligibility verification requirements for public benefits, specifically including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Mo HealthNet. Specifically, only people who are United States citizens, United States Nationals, or meet the definition of an eligible alien and qualified alien under federal law are eligible for public benefits.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Jason Bean

Missouri Senate, District 25 · R–MO

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Jason Bean
Missouri Legislature · SB 656

Establishes the Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act

Mar 24, 2025 · Did not pass

Sen. Jason Bean · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

SB 656 - This act establishes the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act", which is a grant program established in the Department of Economic Development for the purpose of supporting the development of workforce housing in rural communities. A nonprofit development organization, as defined in the act, may apply to the Department for approval for a workforce housing grant to establish a workforce housing investment fund. Grants shall be awarded on a competitive basis, and no more than one million dollars shall be awarded to any one nonprofit development organization over a two year period, and no more than two million dollars to any one nonprofit development organization for the period…

This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-03-24: Second Read and Referred S Economic and Workforce Development Committee.

Why this record is included

The record addresses rental housing costs, tenancy, or housing supply relevant to median gross rent. Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities; the record does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.

Retained Missouri evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SB 656 - This act establishes the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act", which is a grant program established in the Department of Economic Development for the purpose of supporting the development of workforce housing in rural communities. A nonprofit development organization, as defined in the act, may apply to the Department for approval for a workforce housing grant to establish a workforce housing investment fund. Grants shall be awarded on a competitive basis, and no more than one million dollars shall be awarded to any one nonprofit development organization over a two year period, and no more than two million dollars to any one nonprofit development organization for the period ending on June 30, 2028. If a nonprofit development organization fails to allocate any remaining grant funds to qualified activities within two years of the commencement of initial qualified activity, such organization shall return all unallocated grant funds. Beginning August 28, 2030, the Department shall transfer any remaining grant funds held by the Department to the Missouri Housing Trust Fund. Annual reports shall be filed by all nonprofit development organizations and by the Department, as described in the act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.