Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.
Uninsured rate · all ages7.7%2024 · #22 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 659.4%2024 · #20 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6572.7%2024 · #24 of 50 · highest first
Missouri over time
Explore Missouri readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Missouri officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Missouri effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Missouri change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Uninsured rate · all ages Missouri · source units
MissouriPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
450 of 450 reviewed Missouri actions match · 136 date markers shown. 21 major events shown separately.
Missouri · 2024: 7.7% · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Missouri · state comparison
Who has health coverage?
Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.
Missouri · 20247.7%
Missouri rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Uninsured rate · all ages
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.
ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2024 · Missouri: 7.7% · Rank #22 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Uninsured rate · all ages history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2014
11.7%
2015
9.8%
2016
8.9%
2017
9.1%
2018
9.4%
2019
10%
2020
Not available
2021
9.4%
2022
8.6%
2023
7.5%
2024
7.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 7.7%2024 · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
16.7%
—
#2
Georgia
12%
—
#3
Oklahoma
11.5%
—
#4
Nevada
11.4%
—
#5
Alaska
11%
—
#6
Florida
10.9%
—
#7
Arizona
10.3%
—
#7
Wyoming
10.3%
—
#9
New Mexico
10.1%
—
#10
Mississippi
9.7%
—
#10
Tennessee
9.7%
—
#12
Arkansas
9.4%
—
#13
Idaho
9.2%
—
#14
South Carolina
9%
—
#15
Montana
8.8%
—
#16
North Carolina
8.6%
—
#17
Kansas
8.5%
—
#18
Utah
8.3%
—
#19
Alabama
8.2%
—
#20
South Dakota
8.1%
—
#21
Colorado
7.9%
—
#22
Louisiana
7.7%
—
#22
Missouri · your comparison
7.7%
—
#22
New Jersey
7.7%
—
#25
Indiana
7.5%
—
#26
Nebraska
7.1%
—
#27
Delaware
6.9%
—
#27
Illinois
6.9%
—
#27
Virginia
6.9%
—
#30
Kentucky
6.8%
—
#31
Ohio
6.7%
—
#32
Washington
6.5%
—
#33
Maryland
6.3%
—
#34
North Dakota
6.1%
—
#35
California
5.9%
—
#36
Connecticut
5.8%
—
#36
Pennsylvania
5.8%
—
#36
West Virginia
5.8%
—
#39
Maine
5.5%
—
#40
Iowa
5.4%
—
#41
Wisconsin
5.3%
—
#42
Oregon
5.2%
—
#43
Michigan
5.1%
—
#43
Minnesota
5.1%
—
#45
New York
5%
—
#46
Rhode Island
4.6%
—
#47
New Hampshire
4.5%
—
#48
Vermont
4.2%
—
#49
Hawaii
3.5%
—
#50
Massachusetts
2.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Missouri’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the 2024 American Community Survey 1-year estimate.
This is a survey estimate for people under 65 and does not describe coverage type or continuity of coverage.
Insurance status alone does not measure affordability, access, quality, or health outcomes.
State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Missouri with every state.
Missouri · 2020$9,921
Missouri rank#29among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal healthcare spending per resident
Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.
2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2020 · Missouri: $9,921 · Rank #29 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Personal healthcare spending per resident history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2014
$7,828
2015
$8,261
2016
$8,608
2017
$8,824
2018
$9,032
2019
$9,431
2020
$9,921
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · $9,9212020 · Rank #29 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$14,007
—
#2
Alaska
$13,642
—
#3
Massachusetts
$13,319
—
#4
Delaware
$12,899
—
#5
West Virginia
$12,769
—
#6
Vermont
$12,756
—
#7
South Dakota
$12,495
—
#8
Connecticut
$12,489
—
#9
Maine
$12,077
—
#10
New Jersey
$11,868
—
#11
New Hampshire
$11,793
—
#12
Rhode Island
$11,694
—
#13
Pennsylvania
$11,603
—
#14
North Dakota
$11,301
—
#15
Wyoming
$10,989
—
#16
Minnesota
$10,846
—
#17
Maryland
$10,839
—
#18
Indiana
$10,517
—
#19
Louisiana
$10,515
—
#20
Nebraska
$10,514
—
#21
Ohio
$10,478
—
#22
California
$10,299
—
#23
Hawaii
$10,291
—
#24
Kentucky
$10,257
—
#25
Montana
$10,212
—
#26
Illinois
$10,190
—
#27
Oregon
$10,071
—
#28
Wisconsin
$9,982
—
#29
Missouri · your comparison
$9,921
—
#30
Michigan
$9,897
—
#31
Florida
$9,865
—
#32
Iowa
$9,789
—
#33
Oklahoma
$9,444
—
#34
Kansas
$9,408
—
#35
Mississippi
$9,394
—
#36
Arkansas
$9,338
—
#37
Tennessee
$9,336
—
#38
Alabama
$9,280
—
#39
Washington
$9,265
—
#40
Virginia
$9,195
—
#41
North Carolina
$8,917
—
#42
New Mexico
$8,902
—
#43
South Carolina
$8,766
—
#44
Georgia
$8,758
—
#45
Arizona
$8,756
—
#46
Colorado
$8,583
—
#47
Texas
$8,406
—
#48
Nevada
$8,348
—
#49
Idaho
$8,148
—
#50
Utah
$7,522
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.
Missouri · 202275.2 years
Missouri rank#40among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Life expectancy at birth
FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Missouri population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.
The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2022 · Missouri: 75.2 years · Rank #40 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Life expectancy at birth history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2018
76.6 years
2019
76.9 years
2020
75.1 years
2021
74.6 years
2022
75.2 years
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 75.2 years2022 · Rank #40 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
80 years
—
#2
Massachusetts
79.8 years
—
#3
New Jersey
79.6 years
—
#4
New York
79.5 years
—
#5
Connecticut
79.4 years
—
#6
California
79.3 years
—
#6
Minnesota
79.3 years
—
#8
Rhode Island
79.2 years
—
#9
Utah
79 years
—
#10
New Hampshire
78.7 years
—
#11
Colorado
78.5 years
—
#12
Idaho
78.4 years
—
#12
Washington
78.4 years
—
#14
Nebraska
78.3 years
—
#14
Vermont
78.3 years
—
#16
Wisconsin
78.1 years
—
#17
Florida
77.9 years
—
#17
Iowa
77.9 years
—
#17
North Dakota
77.9 years
—
#20
Maryland
77.8 years
—
#21
Oregon
77.7 years
—
#22
Illinois
77.5 years
—
#22
Virginia
77.5 years
—
#24
Montana
77.3 years
—
#24
Pennsylvania
77.3 years
—
#24
South Dakota
77.3 years
—
#27
Texas
77.1 years
—
#28
Michigan
76.8 years
—
#28
Wyoming
76.8 years
—
#30
Arizona
76.7 years
—
#31
Maine
76.6 years
—
#32
Delaware
76.5 years
—
#32
Kansas
76.5 years
—
#34
Nevada
76.4 years
—
#35
Georgia
75.9 years
—
#35
North Carolina
75.9 years
—
#37
Alaska
75.8 years
—
#38
Ohio
75.6 years
—
#39
Indiana
75.4 years
—
#40
Missouri · your comparison
75.2 years
—
#41
South Carolina
75.1 years
—
#42
New Mexico
74.5 years
—
#43
Arkansas
73.9 years
—
#44
Alabama
73.8 years
—
#44
Louisiana
73.8 years
—
#44
Oklahoma
73.8 years
—
#44
Tennessee
73.8 years
—
#48
Kentucky
73.6 years
—
#49
Mississippi
72.6 years
—
#50
West Virginia
72.2 years
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.
Missouri · 202310.7%
Missouri rank#20among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted
Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.
Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Missouri
2023 · Missouri: 10.7% · Rank #20 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Missouri Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
Period
Missouri
Compare
2019
9.1%
2020
9.5%
2021
10%
2022
10.2%
2023
10.7%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 10.7%2023 · Rank #20 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 9.9% – 11.7%Selected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Mississippi
15.1%
95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1
West Virginia
15.1%
95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3
Louisiana
14.6%
95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4
Alabama
14%
95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5
Arkansas
13.1%
95% CI: 12–14.3
#6
South Carolina
12.7%
95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6
Tennessee
12.7%
95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8
Texas
12.1%
95% CI: 11–13.3
#9
Indiana
11.7%
95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10
Georgia
11.5%
95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10
Ohio
11.5%
95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12
Oklahoma
11.3%
95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13
Delaware
11.1%
95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14
North Carolina
11%
95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15
Illinois
10.9%
95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15
Maryland
10.9%
95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15
Michigan
10.9%
95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18
Nevada
10.8%
95% CI: 8.9–13
#18
New Mexico
10.8%
95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20
Missouri · your comparison
10.7%
95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20
South Dakota
10.7%
95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22
California
10.6%
95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23
Kansas
10.5%
95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24
Virginia
10.4%
95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25
Florida
10.1%
95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26
Rhode Island
10%
95% CI: 9.1–11
#27
Arizona
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27
Iowa
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29
Nebraska
9.7%
95% CI: 9–10.3
#30
Wisconsin
9.6%
95% CI: 9–10.2
#31
Hawaii
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31
New York
9.5%
95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31
Oregon
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34
Wyoming
9.4%
95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35
Minnesota
9.3%
95% CI: 8.6–10
#36
New Jersey
9.1%
95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37
Maine
9%
95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38
North Dakota
8.9%
95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39
Idaho
8.7%
95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40
Washington
8.6%
95% CI: 8.2–9
#41
Massachusetts
8.5%
95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42
Connecticut
8.4%
95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43
Alaska
8.2%
95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44
Utah
8.1%
95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45
Colorado
8%
95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46
Montana
7.9%
95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46
New Hampshire
7.9%
95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48
Vermont
7.8%
95% CI: 7–8.7
—
Kentucky
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Pennsylvania
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.
Missouri · June 30, 202623.7%
Missouri rank#49among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Primary care · need met
HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.
National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 23.7%June 30, 2026 · Rank #49 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Jersey
83.2%
—
#2
Vermont
82.6%
—
#3
South Carolina
79.4%
—
#4
New Hampshire
74.8%
—
#5
Rhode Island
74.3%
—
#6
Louisiana
72.1%
—
#7
Hawaii
67.1%
—
#8
Utah
65.4%
—
#9
Wisconsin
65.2%
—
#10
Alabama
63%
—
#11
Connecticut
60.3%
—
#12
Massachusetts
58%
—
#13
Tennessee
58%
—
#14
Virginia
57.2%
—
#15
Pennsylvania
56.7%
—
#16
Maine
56%
—
#17
Minnesota
55.4%
—
#18
Wyoming
54.4%
—
#19
Indiana
54.2%
—
#20
California
53.2%
—
#21
Arkansas
52.6%
—
#22
Texas
49.8%
—
#23
Ohio
49.7%
—
#24
Nebraska
49.1%
—
#25
Alaska
48.9%
—
#26
North Carolina
48.1%
—
#27
Colorado
47.5%
—
#28
Michigan
44.9%
—
#29
Oregon
43.9%
—
#30
Idaho
43.9%
—
#31
Washington
42.4%
—
#32
Illinois
41.5%
—
#33
Nevada
41.5%
—
#34
Arizona
41.2%
—
#35
Kansas
41.1%
—
#36
Iowa
40.5%
—
#37
Florida
39.7%
—
#38
Georgia
39.1%
—
#39
Montana
38.5%
—
#40
West Virginia
38.3%
—
#41
North Dakota
36.5%
—
#42
New York
35.3%
—
#43
South Dakota
34.6%
—
#44
Mississippi
34.1%
—
#45
Maryland
31.6%
—
#46
New Mexico
31.4%
—
#47
Kentucky
30.8%
—
#48
Oklahoma
28.6%
—
#49
Missouri · your comparison
23.7%
—
#50
Delaware
11.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.
Missouri · 2020$7,179
Missouri rank#23among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Single coverage premium · all firms
Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.
Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · $7,1792020 · Rank #23 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alaska
$8,635
—
#2
New York
$8,177
—
#3
New Hampshire
$7,991
—
#4
Vermont
$7,868
—
#5
Wyoming
$7,743
—
#6
Nebraska
$7,611
—
#7
South Carolina
$7,516
—
#8
Connecticut
$7,501
—
#9
Maine
$7,496
—
#10
Massachusetts
$7,452
—
#11
Washington
$7,440
—
#12
New Mexico
$7,424
—
#13
Illinois
$7,376
—
#14
New Jersey
$7,373
—
#15
Maryland
$7,352
—
#16
Rhode Island
$7,326
—
#17
Indiana
$7,319
—
#18
Delaware
$7,280
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7,250
—
#20
Pennsylvania
$7,246
—
#21
North Dakota
$7,216
—
#22
Colorado
$7,206
—
#23
Missouri · your comparison
$7,179
—
#24
California
$7,173
—
#25
Florida
$7,078
—
#26
South Dakota
$7,070
—
#27
Oklahoma
$7,058
—
#28
Hawaii
$7,040
—
#29
North Carolina
$7,036
—
#30
Texas
$7,017
—
#31
West Virginia
$6,993
—
#32
Ohio
$6,989
—
#33
Kentucky
$6,949
—
#34
Iowa
$6,932
—
#35
Virginia
$6,928
—
#36
Oregon
$6,917
—
#37
Minnesota
$6,910
—
#38
Georgia
$6,876
—
#39
Montana
$6,860
—
#40
Idaho
$6,744
—
#41
Louisiana
$6,713
—
#42
Michigan
$6,683
—
#43
Kansas
$6,675
—
#44
Arizona
$6,612
—
#45
Utah
$6,593
—
#46
Mississippi
$6,561
—
#47
Nevada
$6,493
—
#48
Tennessee
$6,485
—
#49
Arkansas
$6,414
—
#50
Alabama
$6,393
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.
Missouri · 2023–202425.7%
Missouri rank#12among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+
Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.
Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Missouri stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Missouri has a dark outline.
Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Missouri · 25.7%2023–2024 · Rank #12 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Missouri with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Oregon
31.6%
—
#2
Vermont
29.1%
—
#3
West Virginia
28.1%
—
#4
Washington
27.9%
—
#5
New Hampshire
27.7%
—
#6
Tennessee
27%
—
#7
Utah
26.7%
—
#8
Maine
26.7%
—
#9
Arkansas
26.6%
—
#10
Colorado
26.4%
—
#11
Rhode Island
25.8%
—
#12
Missouri · your comparison
25.7%
—
#13
Montana
25.6%
—
#14
Indiana
25.3%
—
#15
Kentucky
25.3%
—
#16
Georgia
25.2%
—
#17
Iowa
25%
—
#18
Massachusetts
24.9%
—
#19
Wyoming
24.7%
—
#20
Nevada
24.6%
—
#21
Arizona
24.6%
—
#22
Wisconsin
24.6%
—
#23
Idaho
24.5%
—
#24
Nebraska
24.1%
—
#25
Louisiana
24.1%
—
#26
Alaska
24%
—
#27
Pennsylvania
23.9%
—
#28
New Mexico
23.9%
—
#28
Ohio
23.9%
—
#30
Connecticut
23.7%
—
#31
Kansas
23.7%
—
#32
Michigan
23.6%
—
#33
Virginia
23.1%
—
#34
Alabama
23%
—
#35
North Dakota
23%
—
#36
Maryland
22.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
22.6%
—
#38
Minnesota
22.6%
—
#39
Illinois
22.2%
—
#40
Delaware
22.1%
—
#41
New York
21.9%
—
#42
South Dakota
21.8%
—
#43
California
21.6%
—
#44
North Carolina
21.4%
—
#45
Florida
20.8%
—
#46
Texas
20.7%
—
#47
Mississippi
20.5%
—
#48
Hawaii
19.8%
—
#49
South Carolina
19.8%
—
#50
New Jersey
18.1%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
450 of 450 reviewed Missouri actions · newest first
Aug 3, 2026 · H.R. 10015 · Great American Healthcare Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Missouri delegation · H.R. 10015
Great American Healthcare Act
Aug 3, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Eric Burlison · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
H.R. 10015 would expand health savings accounts, recognize qualifying health marketplace pools as employers offering group health coverage, and impose hospital and insurer price-transparency requirements, among other changes.
2026-08-03: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and Workforce, the Judiciary, Armed Services, Veterans' Affairs, Foreign Affairs, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. This proposal has not been enacted.
Why this record is included
The marketplace-pool provisions would change how eligible people obtain group health coverage, a direct connection to insurance status. Savings-account and price-transparency provisions alone do not establish that someone is insured. The bill remains a proposal.
Retained Missouri evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
H.R. 10015 would expand health savings accounts, recognize qualifying health marketplace pools as employers offering group health coverage, and impose hospital and insurer price-transparency requirements, among other changes.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 13, 2026 · SB 905 · Signed SB 905: Modifies language relating to school protection officers and creates Missouri Rangers training program · SignedGovernor · SB 905
Signed SB 905: Modifies language relating to school protection officers and creates Missouri Rangers training program
Jul 13, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Mike Kehoe · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Governor Mike Kehoe signed SB 905 in the 2026 session. The relevant provision in the official final summary is: This act requires the POST Commission to establish a training program to be known as the "Missouri Rangers", and shall establish minimum standards for training instructors, training centers, and training programs that focus on preventing and responding to emergency or violent crisis situations in school settings. The arrest powers granted to any person who successfully completes the Missouri Rangers training program shall be limited to property or premises owned, leased, rented, or possessed by the school or school district and firearms offenses. This provision shall not apply to any person who is an active law enforcement officer. The training program shall be established by the POST Commission. The program shall not be longer than one hundred sixty hours, and shall consist of state and federal constitutional and statutory law; firearms training; close quarter combat; implicit and racial bias; active shooter training; defensive tactics; and any other related training deemed necessary by POST. An applicant shall not be granted entry to the training program without successfully…
The independently verified approval record documents Governor Kehoe’s signature on 2026-07-13. This entry does not establish subsequent legal enforcement or implementation.
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This act requires the POST Commission to establish a training program to be known as the "Missouri Rangers", and shall establish minimum standards for training instructors, training centers, and training programs that focus on preventing and responding to emergency or violent crisis situations in school settings. The arrest powers granted to any person who successfully completes the Missouri Rangers training program shall be limited to property or premises owned, leased, rented, or possessed by the school or school district and firearms offenses. This provision shall not apply to any person who is an active law enforcement officer. The training program shall be established by the POST Commission. The program shall not be longer than one hundred sixty hours, and shall consist of state and federal constitutional and statutory law; firearms training; close quarter combat; implicit and racial bias; active shooter training; defensive tactics; and any other related training deemed necessary by POST. An applicant shall not be granted entry to the training program without successfully completing the physical training requirements for their age range. Under this act, the outermost garment of the Missouri Ranger uniform must display the title "RANGER" in capitalized block letters. A school or school district that utilizes this program has the authority to allow Rangers to carry a firearm or other weapon capable of lethal use on school property. The school or school district shall also decide the type of weapon carried and whether it shall be concealed.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 13, 2026 · SB 905 · Modifies language relating to school protection officers and creates Missouri Rangers training program · EnactedMissouri Legislature · SB 905
Modifies language relating to school protection officers and creates Missouri Rangers training program
Jul 13, 2026 · Enacted
Sen. David Gregory · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This act requires the POST Commission to establish a training program to be known as the "Missouri Rangers", and shall establish minimum standards for training instructors, training centers, and training programs that focus on preventing and responding to emergency or violent crisis situations in school settings. The arrest powers granted to any person who successfully completes the Missouri Rangers training program shall be limited to property or premises owned, leased, rented, or possessed by the school or school district and firearms offenses. This provision shall not apply to any person who is an active law enforcement officer. The training program shall be established by the POST…
Approved by the Governor on 2026-07-13. The recorded final action was 2026-07-13: Signed by Governor. This is the legislative disposition; subsequent court rulings may affect enforcement.
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This act requires the POST Commission to establish a training program to be known as the "Missouri Rangers", and shall establish minimum standards for training instructors, training centers, and training programs that focus on preventing and responding to emergency or violent crisis situations in school settings. The arrest powers granted to any person who successfully completes the Missouri Rangers training program shall be limited to property or premises owned, leased, rented, or possessed by the school or school district and firearms offenses. This provision shall not apply to any person who is an active law enforcement officer. The training program shall be established by the POST Commission. The program shall not be longer than one hundred sixty hours, and shall consist of state and federal constitutional and statutory law; firearms training; close quarter combat; implicit and racial bias; active shooter training; defensive tactics; and any other related training deemed necessary by POST. An applicant shall not be granted entry to the training program without successfully completing the physical training requirements for their age range. Under this act, the outermost garment of the Missouri Ranger uniform must display the title "RANGER" in capitalized block letters. A school or school district that utilizes this program has the authority to allow Rangers to carry a firearm or other weapon capable of lethal use on school property. The school or school district shall also decide the type of weapon carried and whether it shall be concealed.
The training program shall be established by the POST Commission. The program shall not be longer than one hundred sixty hours, and shall consist of state and federal constitutional and statutory law; firearms training; close quarter combat; implicit and racial bias; active shooter training; defensive tactics; and any other related training deemed necessary by POST. The POST commission is granted the authority to promulgate rules for continuing education training for the Missouri Rangers.
Approved by the Governor on 2026-07-09. The recorded final action was 2026-07-09: Signed by Governor. This is the legislative disposition; subsequent court rulings may affect enforcement.
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The training program shall be established by the POST Commission. The program shall not be longer than one hundred sixty hours, and shall consist of state and federal constitutional and statutory law; firearms training; close quarter combat; implicit and racial bias; active shooter training; defensive tactics; and any other related training deemed necessary by POST. The POST commission is granted the authority to promulgate rules for continuing education training for the Missouri Rangers.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 9, 2026 · SB 1421 · Signed SB 1421: Modifies provisions relating to public safety · SignedGovernor · SB 1421
Signed SB 1421: Modifies provisions relating to public safety
Jul 9, 2026 · Signed
Gov. Mike Kehoe · Signed
FactVote reviewed summary
Governor Mike Kehoe signed SB 1421 in the 2026 session. The relevant provision in the official final summary is: The training program shall be established by the POST Commission. The program shall not be longer than one hundred sixty hours, and shall consist of state and federal constitutional and statutory law; firearms training; close quarter combat; implicit and racial bias; active shooter training; defensive tactics; and any other related training deemed necessary by POST. The POST commission is granted the authority to promulgate rules for continuing education training for the Missouri Rangers.
The independently verified approval record documents Governor Kehoe’s signature on 2026-07-09. This entry does not establish subsequent legal enforcement or implementation.
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
The training program shall be established by the POST Commission. The program shall not be longer than one hundred sixty hours, and shall consist of state and federal constitutional and statutory law; firearms training; close quarter combat; implicit and racial bias; active shooter training; defensive tactics; and any other related training deemed necessary by POST. The POST commission is granted the authority to promulgate rules for continuing education training for the Missouri Rangers.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑May 15, 2026 · HB 2401 · Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms · Did not passMissouri Legislature · HB 2401
Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures the firearms are not accessible to unauthorized persons and unauthorized persons do not have access to any unlocking mechanism necessary for accessibility; and (3) That have a personalized firearm's safety characteristics activated. The requirement for the responsible and secured storage of a firearm, as specified in the bill, will not apply to the storing of an antique firearm, as defined under 18 U.S.C. Section 921, or a curio or relic, as defined under 27 CFR 478.11. The offense of unlawful storage of a firearm is punishable by a $500 fine for a first violation and punishable as a class B misdemeanor for a second or any subsequent violation. It is a defense to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if a child gained possession of and used the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense, defense of others, or defense of livestock. Any firearms dealer must post in a conspicuous location on their premises a written notice as illustrated in the bill and to be made publicly available by the Department of Public Safety. A firearm dealer in violation of this provision may be punished by a warning for a first violation and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for a second or subsequent violation. The Department must publish on its website, in both English and Spanish, information relating to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm and related penalties. This bill is similar to HB 2113 (2026);
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Missouri officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Missouri candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
63 statements from 12 candidates
2026 Missouri U.S. House — District 1 — General Election
2 candidates with matching statements · 9 statements
Republicans and Democrats agree that government should have all-encompassing authoritarian control over our healthcare system including a massive regulatory apparatus, the FDA, medicare, medicaid, endless subsidies, and ever-expanding control over health insurance companies.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The Republican/Democrat uniparty has grown our government into an out of control, oppressive system, destroyed our currency, wrecked our healthcare industry, and executed a foreign policy of endless wars, bombings, death, and destruction. The Libertarian Party is the true opposition to the uniparty war machine, the only bulwark against the uniparty's spiral ever further into forced collectivism. The real debate in America is not left vs. right, but liberty vs. tyranny. Libertarians are fighting for a free society, where individuals are allowed to pursue their goals and dreams without interference from government, where the power is taken out of the hands of the monolithic state and returned to individual choice, and where values of self-ownership and freedom of conscience triumph over coercion and tyranny. I will never stop fighting for individualism and peace, and against the darkness of forced collectivism and endless war. Thank you for visiting my website and for having an open mind, I hope to earn your vote this November. -Tom Schmitz, Libertarian Party Candidate for Congress in Missouri's 1st Congressional District
Candidate campaign source
Republicans and Democrats agree that government should have all-encompassing authoritarian control over our healthcare system including a massive regulatory apparatus, the FDA, medicare, medicaid, endless subsidies, and ever-expanding control over health insurance companies.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
No family should have to choose between keeping their health insurance and paying their bills. But MAGA Republicans let Affordable Care Act subsidies expire, causing premiums to jump as much as 75% for working families in MO-01, and resulting in a devastating blow to people who are already stretched…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
No family should have to choose between keeping their health insurance and paying their bills. But MAGA Republicans let Affordable Care Act subsidies expire, causing premiums to jump as much as 75% for working families in MO-01, and resulting in a devastating blow to people who are already stretched thin. Wesley has fought at every turn to extend these subsidies and keep health care affordable for the people of St. Louis.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
No one should have to ration their medication or skip a doctor's visit because they can't afford it. Drug companies are making record profits while families in MO-01 struggle to afford the medications they need to survive. Wesley has been a consistent voice for capping drug prices, taking on Big Pha…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
No one should have to ration their medication or skip a doctor's visit because they can't afford it. Drug companies are making record profits while families in MO-01 struggle to afford the medications they need to survive. Wesley has been a consistent voice for capping drug prices, taking on Big Pharma, and ensuring that life-saving medications are affordable for every family in St. Louis.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Real public safety means addressing the root causes of crime. As Prosecuting Attorney in the largest county in Missouri, Wesley overhauled how the office approached public safety: he created a Community Outreach Division to build trust between residents and law enforcement, hired social workers to a…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reforming Our Criminal Justice System.
Candidate campaign source
Real public safety means addressing the root causes of crime. As Prosecuting Attorney in the largest county in Missouri, Wesley overhauled how the office approached public safety: he created a Community Outreach Division to build trust between residents and law enforcement, hired social workers to address mental health and behavioral issues, and diverted over 2,500 non-violent offenders struggling with addiction and mental illness into treatment programs, with a 96% success rate. He built a Violence Reduction Strategy, launched a restorative justice center, and worked alongside 55 police departments to make St. Louis County safer for everyone. In Congress, Wesley has continued that work, introducing major reforms to the pretrial detention system, launching the Congressional Diversion and Rehabilitation Caucus, and fighting for a justice system that prioritizes prevention and rehabilitation over punishment.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Government should work for everyone, not just those at the top. But Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans are slashing health care and food assistance programs, and giving even more tax breaks to billionaires and big corporations. Trump used ICE as his own unaccountable paramilitary to terrorize immigra…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Government accountability, health care, food assistance, and immigration
Candidate campaign source
Government should work for everyone, not just those at the top. But Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans are slashing health care and food assistance programs, and giving even more tax breaks to billionaires and big corporations. Trump used ICE as his own unaccountable paramilitary to terrorize immigrants and separate families. And when Congress passed bipartisan legislation to release files exposing Jeffrey Epstein's criminal network, this administration fought transparency every step of the way. In Congress, Wesley Bell is standing up to this reckless and dangerous administration at every step.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A strong leader for common-sense solutions. Learn more about Wesley Bell here.
Candidate campaign source
Now, Wesley is running for reelection to continue fighting for his constituents in Washington: holding the Trump administration and MAGA Republicans accountable, expanding access to affordable health care and prescription drugs, lowering energy costs, bringing down the price of groceries, protecting our rights and freedoms, and creating good-paying jobs right here in St. Louis.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
For decades, families in North St. Louis County suffered cancers and illness from radioactive contamination linked to the federal government's own actions. Wesley fought to expand the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to finally deliver the compensation and health care that all affected families d…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Delivering Justice for Coldwater Creek Families.
Candidate campaign source
For decades, families in North St. Louis County suffered cancers and illness from radioactive contamination linked to the federal government's own actions. Wesley fought to expand the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act to finally deliver the compensation and health care that all affected families deserve, and he'll keep pushing until every eligible family gets what they're owed.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The decision to have an abortion should be between a woman and her doctor, not the government or politicians. Missouri has one of the most extreme abortion bans in the country, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Meanwhile, the Trump administration continues to roll back reproductive rights, putt…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Protecting Abortion Rights.
Candidate campaign source
The decision to have an abortion should be between a woman and her doctor, not the government or politicians. Missouri has one of the most extreme abortion bans in the country, with no exceptions for rape or incest. Meanwhile, the Trump administration continues to roll back reproductive rights, putting women as well as their families in danger. After Roe v. Wade was struck down, Wesley was one of the first prosecutors in the country to pledge not to prosecute those who seek or provide abortions. Wesley supports codifying abortion rights at the federal level, so that everyone, regardless of what state they live in, can access necessary and life-saving health care.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
When devastating tornadoes destroyed over 5,000 structures in our community, Wesley pressed for a federal disaster declaration and fought to make sure families got the housing assistance, health care, and rebuilding support they urgently needed. While there’s more work to do, these resources are alr…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Supporting St. Louis After the 2025 Tornadoes.
Candidate campaign source
When devastating tornadoes destroyed over 5,000 structures in our community, Wesley pressed for a federal disaster declaration and fought to make sure families got the housing assistance, health care, and rebuilding support they urgently needed. While there’s more work to do, these resources are already helping our region recover stronger and faster.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I support the Leveling the Playing Field approach and immediate reforms that can pass and help people now: restoring ACA subsidies, reversing damaging Medicaid cuts, lowering the Medicare eligibility age, and creating a strong public option.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Retiring with Dignity
Candidate campaign source
I support the Leveling the Playing Field approach and immediate reforms that can pass and help people now: restoring ACA subsidies, reversing damaging Medicaid cuts, lowering the Medicare eligibility age, and creating a strong public option.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
After a lifetime of hard work, every Missourian should be able to retire with dignity and security. No one should have to choose between paying for medicine, housing, or heat in their later years. We must protect Social Security and Medicare, defend pensions, and strengthen retirement benefits so th…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Retiring with Dignity
Candidate campaign source
After a lifetime of hard work, every Missourian should be able to retire with dignity and security. No one should have to choose between paying for medicine, housing, or heat in their later years. We must protect Social Security and Medicare, defend pensions, and strengthen retirement benefits so that those who built this country can live their final years with stability and respect.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We should keep working toward a system where everyone is covered. But I am going to Congress to deliver real progress, not make promises that leave more than 20,000 uninsured people in this district waiting for help.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
We should keep working toward a system where everyone is covered. But I am going to Congress to deliver real progress, not make promises that leave more than 20,000 uninsured people in this district waiting for help.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Missourians deserve a fair shot at a good life. That starts with affordable healthcare, lower costs, and the freedom to build a secure future. Every family should be able to see a doctor when they are sick, afford the medicine they need, and keep a roof over their heads without being buried in debt.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Claim your free yard sign
Candidate campaign source
Missourians deserve a fair shot at a good life. That starts with affordable healthcare, lower costs, and the freedom to build a secure future. Every family should be able to see a doctor when they are sick, afford the medicine they need, and keep a roof over their heads without being buried in debt.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I will relentlessly focus on protecting Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care from privatization, while expanding mental health and suicide prevention resources, and safeguarding mandatory funding for earned benefits against budget cuts. I oppose the current Taking Care of America’s Vetera…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Veterans and Military
Candidate campaign source
I will relentlessly focus on protecting Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care from privatization, while expanding mental health and suicide prevention resources, and safeguarding mandatory funding for earned benefits against budget cuts. I oppose the current Taking Care of America’s Veterans Act (TCAVA) as written, with Section 108 taking away benefits from future veterans. The idea that the only people being required to adhere to ‘Pay-Go’ rules are veterans while the Department of Defense gets a blank check to wage wars is unacceptable.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families fi…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Affordability
Candidate campaign source
Every Missourian deserves the freedom to build a good life without being burdened by rising costs. Families are working harder than ever but falling further behind because the price of housing, healthcare, childcare, and groceries keeps climbing while wages stay flat. We must put working families first by lowering costs, expanding access to good-paying jobs, and making sure every family can afford the basics — not just to survive, but to thrive.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
The government should not be tracking medical records, overruling parents and doctors, or denying medically appropriate care because of political ideology. I will defend every Missourian’s right to privacy and oppose efforts to punish patients, families, or healthcare professionals for making deeply…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Personal Medical Freedom
Candidate campaign source
The government should not be tracking medical records, overruling parents and doctors, or denying medically appropriate care because of political ideology. I will defend every Missourian’s right to privacy and oppose efforts to punish patients, families, or healthcare professionals for making deeply personal medical decisions.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
No one should have to choose between paying for medicine and paying the bills. We need to finally bring down drug prices by standing up to the big corporations that put profits ahead of patients. It’s time to hold them accountable and make sure every family can afford the care they need.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
No one should have to choose between paying for medicine and paying the bills. We need to finally bring down drug prices by standing up to the big corporations that put profits ahead of patients. It’s time to hold them accountable and make sure every family can afford the care they need.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
While career politicians enrich themselves and put special interests ahead of working families, Fred is focused on lowering costs, protecting health care, defending the Constitution, and making government work for the people it serves.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: A lifetime of service. A fighter for Missouri.
Candidate campaign source
While career politicians enrich themselves and put special interests ahead of working families, Fred is focused on lowering costs, protecting health care, defending the Constitution, and making government work for the people it serves.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Our economy should reward hard work, not connections or special interests. I believe in a strong floor and no ceiling: everyone should have the security to build a good life and the freedom to rise as far as their talent and hard work can take them. Families are working harder than ever but struggli…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Missourians deserve a fair shot at a good life. That starts with affordable healthcare, lower costs, and the freedom to build a secure future. Every family should be able to see a doctor when they are sick, afford the medicine they need, and keep a roof over their heads without being buried in debt.
Candidate campaign source
Our economy should reward hard work, not connections or special interests. I believe in a strong floor and no ceiling: everyone should have the security to build a good life and the freedom to rise as far as their talent and hard work can take them. Families are working harder than ever but struggling to keep up with the cost of housing, childcare, healthcare, and groceries. It should not take two jobs to make ends meet or a lifetime of work to retire in dignity and stability.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Abortion is healthcare. Access to healthcare saves lives. Equitable access to healthcare is a human right, and no one should experience discrimination because of their gender. I support the Women’s Health Protection Act, ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment, Medicare For All, and expanding access to…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Reproductive Rights
Candidate campaign source
Abortion is healthcare. Access to healthcare saves lives. Equitable access to healthcare is a human right, and no one should experience discrimination because of their gender. I support the Women’s Health Protection Act, ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment, Medicare For All, and expanding access to virtual and telehealth services.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Missourians deserve access to quality, affordable healthcare services to support their physical and mental well-being. It's a matter of personal freedom and financial security.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The Issues That Matter
Candidate campaign source
Missourians deserve access to quality, affordable healthcare services to support their physical and mental well-being. It's a matter of personal freedom and financial security.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Missourians deserve access to quality, affordable healthcare services to support their physical and mental well-being and to have financial security. During the pandemic, thousands across the state have died from Covid complications, and thousands more have been temporarily or permanently disabled. …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Infrastructure
Candidate campaign source
Missourians deserve access to quality, affordable healthcare services to support their physical and mental well-being and to have financial security. During the pandemic, thousands across the state have died from Covid complications, and thousands more have been temporarily or permanently disabled. The mental health impact of Covid and the stress of the pandemic continue to affect nearly every community from the patient to the first responders, overwhelmed with short staff and unbearably long hours and support.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
During the pandemic, thousands across our state died from Covid complications, and thousands more have been temporarily or permanently disabled. The mental health impact of COVID and the stress of the pandemic continue to affect nearly every community from the patient to the first responders, overwh…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: The Issues That Matter
Candidate campaign source
During the pandemic, thousands across our state died from Covid complications, and thousands more have been temporarily or permanently disabled. The mental health impact of COVID and the stress of the pandemic continue to affect nearly every community from the patient to the first responders, overwhelmed with short staff and unbearably long hours and support.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Dr. Onder led successful fights against Obamacare Medicaid Expansion in 2021, and against Bidencare Medicaid Expansion in 2022. Also in 2022, Dr. Onder fought a Democrat-sponsored plan, SB 798, that would have allowed food stamps to be used for restaurant meals and fast food.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Supports Welfare Reform
Candidate campaign source
Dr. Onder led successful fights against Obamacare Medicaid Expansion in 2021, and against Bidencare Medicaid Expansion in 2022. Also in 2022, Dr. Onder fought a Democrat-sponsored plan, SB 798, that would have allowed food stamps to be used for restaurant meals and fast food.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Missouri candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Missouri incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Missouri legislators and Missouri’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Missouri’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
443 matching sponsorships or proposals · 108 Missouri incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Rep. Adrian Plank
Missouri House of Representatives, District 47 · D–MO
4 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Adrian PlankMissouri Legislature · HB 3130
Modifies provisions relating to constitutional liberties
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS (Section 1.411) This bill states certain findings about the duties, powers, and the role of both the Federal and State governments, as described in the bill, including the right to bear arms and the right to assess the legality of searches and seizures. LIMITATION OF POWERS (Section 1.451) This bill further states that no public officer or employee of this State or of a political subdivision has the authority to enforce any Federal laws or regulations regarding firearms or firearm accessories or that allow peace officers acting within the borders of this State to use facial coverings or refuse to identify themselves or the authority under which the officers act.…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS (Section 1.411) This bill states certain findings about the duties, powers, and the role of both the Federal and State governments, as described in the bill, including the right to bear arms and the right to assess the legality of searches and seizures. LIMITATION OF POWERS (Section 1.451) This bill further states that no public officer or employee of this State or of a political subdivision has the authority to enforce any Federal laws or regulations regarding firearms or firearm accessories or that allow peace officers acting within the borders of this State to use facial coverings or refuse to identify themselves or the authority under which the officers act. Nothing in the bill prohibits Missouri officials from accepting aid from Federal officials in an effort to enforce Missouri laws.
HB 550 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Plank This bill repeals the Second Amendment Preservation Act; the General Assembly's preemption of all firearm laws; justification as an absolute defense; and statutes authorizing concealed carry permits. The bill also repeals certain provisions dealing with the use of force: that the use of deadly force can be justified if used against a person who unlawfully enters private property; and that a person does not have a duty to retreat before using deadly force if the person is in a location he or she has a right to be. The bill establishes that a person commits the offense of transfer of a concealable firearm if the person receives or delivers any concealable…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 550 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Plank This bill repeals the Second Amendment Preservation Act; the General Assembly's preemption of all firearm laws; justification as an absolute defense; and statutes authorizing concealed carry permits. The bill also repeals certain provisions dealing with the use of force: that the use of deadly force can be justified if used against a person who unlawfully enters private property; and that a person does not have a duty to retreat before using deadly force if the person is in a location he or she has a right to be. The bill establishes that a person commits the offense of transfer of a concealable firearm if the person receives or delivers any concealable firearm without a valid permit; or the person violates the federal code provided in the bill. A person does not commit the offense of transfer of a concealable firearm if the acquisition or transfer of the firearm is between manufacturers, wholesalers, or retailers of firearms for commercial purposes. Antique firearms or curio or relic firearms are not considered under this offense. The offense of transfer of a concealable results in a class A misdemeanor. The bill establishes that a permit to acquire a concealable firearm will be issued by the sheriff of the county where the applicant resides if the statements made within the permit application are true and the applicant is over 21, a U.S. Citizen, and has been a resident of the State for at least six months; has not plead guilty to or been convicted of a crime other than a misdemeanor punishable as specified in the bill; is not a fugitive or charged with the commission of a crime punishable as specified in the bill; has not been dishonorably discharged; is not mentally incompetent; and has not been committed to a mental health facility. The bill specifies the content of the permit. A permit to acquire a concealable firearm is valid for 30 days. The sheriff must be notified, and will keep a record of, when the permit is used as well as the details of the transaction for which the permit was used.
Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to firearms
May 17, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Adrian Plank · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HJR 145 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Plank Currently, the Missouri Constitution guarantees every State citizen the right to keep and bear arms. Upon voter approval, this resolution would amend the Constitution to allow any county, the city of St. Louis, and the city of Kansas City to regulate the possession, carrying, or transfer of firearms within city or county limits. The resolution authorizes the city or county to, by ordinance, issue a permit or certificate and charge a fee, as specified. For any nonresident, a city or county must recognize as valid any permit or certificate authorizing the possession or carrying of firearms issued by the individual's county of residence. The resolution also…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HJR 145 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Plank Currently, the Missouri Constitution guarantees every State citizen the right to keep and bear arms. Upon voter approval, this resolution would amend the Constitution to allow any county, the city of St. Louis, and the city of Kansas City to regulate the possession, carrying, or transfer of firearms within city or county limits. The resolution authorizes the city or county to, by ordinance, issue a permit or certificate and charge a fee, as specified. For any nonresident, a city or county must recognize as valid any permit or certificate authorizing the possession or carrying of firearms issued by the individual's county of residence. The resolution also lists individuals who must be exempt from any such ordinance.
HB 1866 -- TRANSFER OF A CONCEALABLE FIREARM SPONSOR: Plank This bill repeals the Second Amendment Preservation Act; the General Assembly's preemption of all firearm laws; justification as an absolute defense; and statutes authorizing concealed carry permits. The bill also repeals certain provisions dealing with the use of force: that the use of deadly force can be justified if used against a person who unlawfully enters private property; and that a person does not have a duty to retreat before using deadly force if the person is in a location he or she has a right to be. The bill establishes that a person commits the offense of transfer of a concealable firearm if such person receives or…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1866 -- TRANSFER OF A CONCEALABLE FIREARM SPONSOR: Plank This bill repeals the Second Amendment Preservation Act; the General Assembly's preemption of all firearm laws; justification as an absolute defense; and statutes authorizing concealed carry permits. The bill also repeals certain provisions dealing with the use of force: that the use of deadly force can be justified if used against a person who unlawfully enters private property; and that a person does not have a duty to retreat before using deadly force if the person is in a location he or she has a right to be. The bill establishes that a person commits the offense of transfer of a concealable firearm if such person receives or delivers any concealable firearm without a valid permit; or such person violates the federal code listed in the bill. A permit to acquire a concealable firearm is valid for 30 days. A person does not commit the offense of transfer of a concealable firearm if the acquisition or transfer of the firearm is between manufacturers, wholesalers, or retailers of firearms for commercial purposes. Antique firearms or curio or relic firearms are not considered under this offense. The offense of transfer of a concealable results in a class A misdemeanor. Violation of any of the following constitutes a class A misdemeanor. The bill establishes that a permit to acquire a concealable firearm shall be issued by the sheriff of the county where the applicant resides if the statements made within the permit application are true and the applicant is over 21, a U.S. Citizen, and has been a resident of the State for at least six months; has not plead guilty to or been convicted of a crime other than a misdemeanor punishable as listed in the bill; is not a fugitive or charged with the commission of a crime punishable as listed in the bill; has not been dishonorably discharged; is not mentally incompetent and has not been committed to a mental health facility.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 134 · R–MO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Alex RileyMissouri Legislature · HB 719
Modifies provisions relating to public assistance
May 1, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Alex Riley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
This bill makes the unlawful receipt by sale or transfer by sale of public assistance benefits or electronic benefits transfer (EBT) cards illegal by modifying existing provisions relating to the offenses of unlawful receipt or unlawful transfer of public assistance benefits or EBT cards. MEDICAID SERVICES FOR PREGNANT WOMEN (208.151, 208.186, 208.239, and 208.662) Currently, low-income pregnant and postpartum women receiving benefits through MO HealthNet for Pregnant Women or Show-Me Healthy Babies are eligible for pregnancy-related coverage throughout the pregnancy and for 60 days following the end of the pregnancy. Under this bill, MO HealthNet coverage for these low-income women will…
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-01: Placed on the Informal Third Reading Calendar (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses eligibility, enrollment, or affordability of health coverage, relevant to the share of people under 65 without insurance. A service-specific benefit or provider-payment rule alone is not a change in insured status. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
This bill makes the unlawful receipt by sale or transfer by sale of public assistance benefits or electronic benefits transfer (EBT) cards illegal by modifying existing provisions relating to the offenses of unlawful receipt or unlawful transfer of public assistance benefits or EBT cards. MEDICAID SERVICES FOR PREGNANT WOMEN (208.151, 208.186, 208.239, and 208.662) Currently, low-income pregnant and postpartum women receiving benefits through MO HealthNet for Pregnant Women or Show-Me Healthy Babies are eligible for pregnancy-related coverage throughout the pregnancy and for 60 days following the end of the pregnancy. Under this bill, MO HealthNet coverage for these low-income women will include full Medicaid benefits for the duration of the pregnancy and for one year following the end of the pregnancy. The Department shall submit any necessary state plan amendments or waivers, as described in the bill.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 127 · R–MO
3 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Ann KelleyMissouri Legislature · HJR 30
Proposes a constitutional amendment that prohibits abortion after fetal viability, except in cases of medical emergency
May 15, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Ann Kelley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HJR 30 -- ABORTION SPONSOR: Kelley Upon voter approval, this proposed amendment to the Constitution, repeals the provisions of Article I, Section 36, known as "The Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative". Additionally, it prohibits abortion of a viable unborn child unless such abortion is necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman whose life is endangered.
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses abortion access, regulation, or reporting, the subject of Missouri’s reported resident-abortion count. That count includes reported care outside Missouri and has reporting gaps. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Resident abortions reported. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HJR 30 -- ABORTION SPONSOR: Kelley Upon voter approval, this proposed amendment to the Constitution, repeals the provisions of Article I, Section 36, known as "The Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative". Additionally, it prohibits abortion of a viable unborn child unless such abortion is necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman whose life is endangered.
Proposes a constitutional amendment that prohibits abortions following the detection of a fetal heartbeat and establishes rights of unborn children
May 15, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Ann Kelley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HJR 31 -- ABORTION SPONSOR: Kelley This amendment to the State Constitution, if approved by voters, repeals the provisions of Article I, Section 36, known as “The Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative”. Additionally, this amendment requires a physician to perform a fetal heartbeat detection test prior to performing or inducing an abortion, except in cases of medical emergency. A physician must not perform or induce an abortion if a fetal heartbeat has been detected. The physician must record in the pregnant woman's medical record the estimated gestational age of the unborn child, the method used to estimate the gestational age, the test used to detect the fetal heartbeat, and the date,…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses abortion access, regulation, or reporting, the subject of Missouri’s reported resident-abortion count. That count includes reported care outside Missouri and has reporting gaps. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Resident abortions reported. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HJR 31 -- ABORTION SPONSOR: Kelley This amendment to the State Constitution, if approved by voters, repeals the provisions of Article I, Section 36, known as “The Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative”. Additionally, this amendment requires a physician to perform a fetal heartbeat detection test prior to performing or inducing an abortion, except in cases of medical emergency. A physician must not perform or induce an abortion if a fetal heartbeat has been detected. The physician must record in the pregnant woman's medical record the estimated gestational age of the unborn child, the method used to estimate the gestational age, the test used to detect the fetal heartbeat, and the date, time, and results of the test. If an abortion is performed or induced without first performing the test because of a medical emergency, the physician must record that information in the pregnant woman's medical record and in the abortion report submitted to the Department of Health and Senior Services. The provisions of this amendment must be exclusively enforced through private civil action, as described in the amendment, and will not be enforced through the State, any political subdivision of the State, a prosecuting or circuit attorney, or an executive or administrative officer of a political subdivision. Any other person may bring a civil action against any person who: (1) Performs or induces an abortion in violation of this amendment; (2) Knowingly engages in conduct that aids or abets in the performance or induction of an abortion in violation of this amendment, including reimbursing the costs of the abortion through insurance or otherwise; or (3) Intends to engage in any of the above conduct. If a claimant prevails, the court must award injunctive relief, damages of not less than $10,000 for each abortion performed or induced in violation of this amendment, and costs and attorney's fees. A court will not award attorney's fees to the defendant.
Prohibits public funds from being expended to any abortion facility, or affiliate or associate thereof, including for MO HealthNet reimbursement, and modifies provisions relating to MO HealthNet providers
May 2, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Ann Kelley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Any taxpayer shall have standing to bring a cause of action in any court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction to enforce these provisions. This bill prohibits any public funding from being expended to any abortion facility, or associate or affiliate thereof, including for MO HealthNet reimbursement. This bill modifies existing statute permitting any MO HealthNet participant to obtain services from any provider of such services in a MO HealthNet provider agreement with the state by requiring such provider to not be disqualified or excluded from serving as a MO HealthNet provider. Additionally, this bill requires the Department of Social Services to suspend, revoke, or cancel any…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-02: Placed Back on Formal Perfection Calendar (H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses abortion access, regulation, or reporting, the subject of Missouri’s reported resident-abortion count. That count includes reported care outside Missouri and has reporting gaps. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Resident abortions reported. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Any taxpayer shall have standing to bring a cause of action in any court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction to enforce these provisions. This bill prohibits any public funding from being expended to any abortion facility, or associate or affiliate thereof, including for MO HealthNet reimbursement. This bill modifies existing statute permitting any MO HealthNet participant to obtain services from any provider of such services in a MO HealthNet provider agreement with the state by requiring such provider to not be disqualified or excluded from serving as a MO HealthNet provider. Additionally, this bill requires the Department of Social Services to suspend, revoke, or cancel any contract or provider agreement, or refuse to enter into a new contract or provider agreement, with any provider when it is determined that the provider is not qualified to perform the required services because such provider has committed certain offenses, as specified in the bill, or because the provider is an abortion facility, or an affiliate or associate thereof. Lastly, this bill prohibits reimbursement to abortion facilities, or associates or affiliates thereof, under the "Uninsured Women's Health Program". This bill is similar to SB 160 (2023).
Missouri House of Representatives, District 36 · D–MO
6 proposalsView proposals from Rep. Anthony EalyMissouri Legislature · HB 2401
Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms
May 15, 2026 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures…
This measure did not pass before the 2026 session ended. Final recorded action on 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2401 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a co-tenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms: (1) Kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Securely stored in a manner that ensures the firearms are not accessible to unauthorized persons and unauthorized persons do not have access to any unlocking mechanism necessary for accessibility; and (3) That have a personalized firearm's safety characteristics activated. The requirement for the responsible and secured storage of a firearm, as specified in the bill, will not apply to the storing of an antique firearm, as defined under 18 U.S.C. Section 921, or a curio or relic, as defined under 27 CFR 478.11. The offense of unlawful storage of a firearm is punishable by a $500 fine for a first violation and punishable as a class B misdemeanor for a second or any subsequent violation. It is a defense to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if a child gained possession of and used the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense, defense of others, or defense of livestock. Any firearms dealer must post in a conspicuous location on their premises a written notice as illustrated in the bill and to be made publicly available by the Department of Public Safety. A firearm dealer in violation of this provision may be punished by a warning for a first violation and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for a second or subsequent violation. The Department must publish on its website, in both English and Spanish, information relating to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm and related penalties. This bill is similar to HB 2113 (2026);
Prohibits persons from carrying firearms into parade zones
May 15, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 94 -- FIREARMS IN PARADE ZONES SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful use of weapons if he or she knowingly carries a firearm or any other weapon readily capable of lethal use into any parade zone during parade hours, as defined in the bill. The bill specifies that no valid concealed carry permit of any type will authorize any person to carry concealed firearms into any parade zone during parade hours. Only a peace officer, may carry a firearm into a parade zone during parade hours. The bill requires a parade host to ensure that all parade attendees go through a checkpoint to enter the parade zone. At the checkpoint, attendees will pass through a…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 94 -- FIREARMS IN PARADE ZONES SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful use of weapons if he or she knowingly carries a firearm or any other weapon readily capable of lethal use into any parade zone during parade hours, as defined in the bill. The bill specifies that no valid concealed carry permit of any type will authorize any person to carry concealed firearms into any parade zone during parade hours. Only a peace officer, may carry a firearm into a parade zone during parade hours. The bill requires a parade host to ensure that all parade attendees go through a checkpoint to enter the parade zone. At the checkpoint, attendees will pass through a metal detector or be scanned by security. Any attendee found to be in possession of a firearm must be denied entrance into the parade zone. This bill is the same as HB 2708 (2024).
Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms
May 15, 2025 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 104 -- SAFE STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a cotenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Such responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms that: (1) Are kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Are securely stored in…
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 104 -- SAFE STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a cotenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Such responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms that: (1) Are kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Are securely stored in a manner that ensures the firearms are not accessible to unauthorized persons and unauthorized persons do not have access to any unlocking mechanism necessary for accessibility; and (3) Have a personalized firearm's safety characteristics activated. The requirement for the responsible and secured storage of a firearm as specified in this bill will not apply to the storing of an antique firearm, as defined under 18 U.S.C. Section 921, or a curio or relic, as defined under 27 CFR 478.11. The offense of unlawful storage of a firearm under the provisions of this bill is punishable by a $500 fine for a first violation and punishable as a class B misdemeanor for a second or any subsequent violation. It is a defense to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if a child or cotenant gained possession of and used the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense, defense of others, or defense of livestock. All firearms dealers must post in a conspicuous location on their premises a written notice that unlawful storage of a firearm may result in imprisonment or fine. A firearm dealer in violation of this provision may be punished by a warning for a first violation and a fine of not more than $500 for a second or subsequent violation. The Department of Public Safety must publish on its website, in both English and Spanish, information relating to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm as specified in this bill and related penalties. This bill is the same as HB 2884 and HB 2577 (2024).
Prohibits persons from carrying firearms into parade zones
May 17, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2708 -- PARADE SECURITY SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful use of weapons if he or she knowingly carries a firearm or any other weapon readily capable of lethal use into any parade zone during parade hours, as defined in the bill. The bill specifies that no valid concealed carry permit of any type will authorize any person to carry concealed firearms into any parade zone during parade hours. Only a peace officer, may carry a firearm into a parade zone during parade hours. This bill requires a parade host to ensure that all parade attendees go through a checkpoint to enter the parade zone. At the checkpoint, attendees will pass through a metal…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2708 -- PARADE SECURITY SPONSOR: Ealy This bill specifies that a person commits the offense of unlawful use of weapons if he or she knowingly carries a firearm or any other weapon readily capable of lethal use into any parade zone during parade hours, as defined in the bill. The bill specifies that no valid concealed carry permit of any type will authorize any person to carry concealed firearms into any parade zone during parade hours. Only a peace officer, may carry a firearm into a parade zone during parade hours. This bill requires a parade host to ensure that all parade attendees go through a checkpoint to enter the parade zone. At the checkpoint, attendees will pass through a metal detector or be scanned by security. Any attendee found to be in possession of a firearm will be denied entrance into the parade zone.
Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to firearms
May 17, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HJR 170 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy Currently, the Missouri Constitution guarantees every State citizen the right to keep and bear arms. Upon voter approval, this resolution would amend the Constitution to allow any county, the city of St. Louis, and the city of Kansas City to regulate the possession, carrying, or transfer of firearms within city or county limits. The resolution authorizes the city or county to, by ordinance, issue a permit or certificate and charge a fee, as specified. For any nonresident, a city or county must recognize as valid any permit or certificate authorizing the possession or carrying of firearms issued by the individual's county of residence. The resolution also…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HJR 170 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy Currently, the Missouri Constitution guarantees every State citizen the right to keep and bear arms. Upon voter approval, this resolution would amend the Constitution to allow any county, the city of St. Louis, and the city of Kansas City to regulate the possession, carrying, or transfer of firearms within city or county limits. The resolution authorizes the city or county to, by ordinance, issue a permit or certificate and charge a fee, as specified. For any nonresident, a city or county must recognize as valid any permit or certificate authorizing the possession or carrying of firearms issued by the individual's county of residence. The resolution also lists individuals who must be exempt from any such ordinance.
Establishes provisions related to the safe storage of firearms
May 17, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Anthony Ealy · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 2884 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill provides that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a cotenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Such responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms that: (1) Are kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Are securely stored in a…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2884 -- STORAGE OF FIREARMS SPONSOR: Ealy This bill provides that a person commits the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if the person fails to responsibly and securely store a firearm upon any premises that the person owns or controls and the person knows or reasonably should know a child can gain access to the firearm without the permission of the child's parent or guardian, or knows or reasonably should know a cotenant is ineligible to possess a firearm under law. Such responsible and secure storage includes, with the exception of a concealed or openly carried firearm in as secured holster, firearms that: (1) Are kept unloaded until ready to use; (2) Are securely stored in a manner that ensures the firearms are not accessible to unauthorized persons and unauthorized persons do not have access to any unlocking mechanism necessary for accessibility; and (3) Have a personalized firearm's safety characteristics activated. The requirement for the responsible and secured storage of a firearm as specified in this bill will not apply to the storing of an antique firearm, as defined under 18 U.S.C. Section 921, or a curio or relic, as defined under 27 CFR 478.11. The offense of unlawful storage of a firearm under the provisions of this bill is punishable by a $500 fine for a first violation and punishable as a class B misdemeanor for a second or any subsequent violation. It is a defense to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm if a child gained possession of and used the firearm in a lawful act of self-defense, defense of others, or defense of livestock. Any firearms dealer must post in a conspicuous location on their premises a written notice that unlawful storage of a firearm may result in imprisonment or fine. A firearm dealer in violation of this provision may be punished by a warning for a first violation and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for a second or subsequent violation. The Department must publish on their website, in both English and Spanish, information relating to the offense of unlawful storage of a firearm as specified in this bill and related penalties. This bill is the same as HB 2577 (2024).
HB 1304 -- ABORTION SPONSOR: Aune This bil modifies definitions and repeals the terms "Down Syndrome", "unborn child", and "viability", "viable", or "viable pregnancy" as those terms pertain to Chapter 188, RSMo, governing the regulation of abortions. It also repeals the term "abortion facility" throughout various sections of statute governing provisions including, but not limited to, data submissions by certain health care providers, licensing requirements for facilities, inspections, and the scope of practice for health care providers.
This measure did not pass before the 2025 session ended. Final recorded action on 2025-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses abortion access, regulation, or reporting, the subject of Missouri’s reported resident-abortion count. That count includes reported care outside Missouri and has reporting gaps. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Resident abortions reported. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1304 -- ABORTION SPONSOR: Aune This bil modifies definitions and repeals the terms "Down Syndrome", "unborn child", and "viability", "viable", or "viable pregnancy" as those terms pertain to Chapter 188, RSMo, governing the regulation of abortions. It also repeals the term "abortion facility" throughout various sections of statute governing provisions including, but not limited to, data submissions by certain health care providers, licensing requirements for facilities, inspections, and the scope of practice for health care providers. This bill also repeals several sections of statute relating to abortion, including, but not limited to, the "Right to Life of the Unborn Child Act", which prohibits abortions from being performed or induced in this state except for medical emergencies, administration requirements of mifepristone, the prohibition of abortions being performed of viable unborn children, the 72-hour required waiting period prior to the performance of an abortion, physician reporting requirements following the performance of an abortion, and the prohibitions of abortions after eight, 14, and 18 weeks of pregnancy.
Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to firearms
May 17, 2024 · Did not pass
Rep. Ashley Aune · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HJR 137 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Aune Currently, the Missouri Constitution guarantees every State citizen the right to keep and bear arms. Upon voter approval, this resolution would amend the Constitution to allow any county, the city of St. Louis, and the city of Kansas City to regulate the possession, carrying, or transfer of firearms within city or county limits. The resolution authorizes the city or county to, by ordinance, issue a permit or certificate and charge a fee, as specified. For any nonresident, a city or county must recognize as valid any permit or certificate authorizing the possession or carrying of firearms issued by the individual's county of residence. The resolution also…
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HJR 137 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Aune Currently, the Missouri Constitution guarantees every State citizen the right to keep and bear arms. Upon voter approval, this resolution would amend the Constitution to allow any county, the city of St. Louis, and the city of Kansas City to regulate the possession, carrying, or transfer of firearms within city or county limits. The resolution authorizes the city or county to, by ordinance, issue a permit or certificate and charge a fee, as specified. For any nonresident, a city or county must recognize as valid any permit or certificate authorizing the possession or carrying of firearms issued by the individual's county of residence. The resolution also lists individuals who must be exempt from any such ordinance.
HB 2806 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Aune This bill makes the carrying of a concealed knife, firearm, or blackjack, without a concealed carry permit, an offense punishable as a class B misdemeanor. Currently, the process for obtaining a concealed carry permit or lifetime or extended concealed carry permit requires an affidavit attesting certain requirements are met. This bill instead requires proof that the applicant has satisfied the requirements of Section 571.111, RSMo.
This measure did not pass before the 2024 session ended. Final recorded action on 2024-05-17: Referred: General Laws(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 2806 -- FIREARMS SPONSOR: Aune This bill makes the carrying of a concealed knife, firearm, or blackjack, without a concealed carry permit, an offense punishable as a class B misdemeanor. Currently, the process for obtaining a concealed carry permit or lifetime or extended concealed carry permit requires an affidavit attesting certain requirements are met. This bill instead requires proof that the applicant has satisfied the requirements of Section 571.111, RSMo.
Missouri House of Representatives, District 146 · R–MO
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Barry HovisMissouri Legislature · HB 1386
Modifies provisions relating to firearms
May 12, 2023 · Did not pass
Rep. Barry Hovis · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
HB 1386 -- TEMPORARY SEIZURE OF FIREARM SPONSOR: Hovis Currently, political subdivisions may enact an ordinance regulating the open carrying of a firearm, provided that such ordinance conforms exactly with state law, with appropriate penalty provisions as designated under state law. This bill provides that such ordinance may establish that the open carrying of a firearm by a minor in violation of the ordinance shall subject the firearm to temporary seizure by a law enforcement officer. The officer shall issue the minor a receipt for each seized firearm. The parent or legal guardian of the minor may claim the seized firearm upon production of the receipt within 30 days. This bill also repeals…
This measure did not pass before the 2023 session ended. Final recorded action on 2023-05-12: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Why this record is included
The record addresses access to firearms, firearm safety, or prevention of firearm injury. Missouri’s firearm-death count includes suicides, homicides, and other intents; the policy’s target may cover only part of that total. This relationship does not establish an effect on the displayed statistic; actions after its measurement period cannot explain the earlier value.
Retained Missouri evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 1386 -- TEMPORARY SEIZURE OF FIREARM SPONSOR: Hovis Currently, political subdivisions may enact an ordinance regulating the open carrying of a firearm, provided that such ordinance conforms exactly with state law, with appropriate penalty provisions as designated under state law. This bill provides that such ordinance may establish that the open carrying of a firearm by a minor in violation of the ordinance shall subject the firearm to temporary seizure by a law enforcement officer. The officer shall issue the minor a receipt for each seized firearm. The parent or legal guardian of the minor may claim the seized firearm upon production of the receipt within 30 days. This bill also repeals the requirement that a law enforcement officer may disarm or physically restrain a person carrying a firearm only upon a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity.
Only current Missouri officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Missouri statistic. Collection reviewed Sep 16, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Missouri snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Missouri, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.