Michigan · individual fact

Michigan health

Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.

Uninsured rate · all ages5.1%2024 · #43 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 656.2%2024 · #43 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6571.8%2024 · #26 of 50 · highest first

Michigan over time

Explore Michigan readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Michigan officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Michigan effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Michigan change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Uninsured rate · all ages Michigan · source units
MichiganPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Uninsured rate · all ages2024: 5.1%3.5%6.5%9.5%Michigan, 2014: 8.5%Michigan, 2015: 6.1%Michigan, 2016: 5.4%Michigan, 2017: 5.2%Michigan, 2018: 5.4%Michigan, 2019: 5.8%Michigan, 2021: 5%Michigan, 2022: 4.5%Michigan, 2023: 4.5%Michigan, 2024: 5.1%201420192024
✦ Major events & context · 29National context · Affordable Care Act signed · 2010-03-23ACA signedNational context · Supreme Court makes ACA Medicaid expansion optional for states · 2012-06-28Medicaid expansion rulingNational context · ACA Marketplace coverage and main Medicaid expansion begin · 2014-01-01ACA coverage beginsMichigan · Flint water-source switch begins lead-exposure period · 2014-04-25Flint water-source switch begins lead-exposure periodMichigan · CDC emergency response to Flint water contamination · 2016-02-01CDC emergency response to Flint water contaminationNational context · Opioid crisis declared a national public-health emergency · 2017-10-26Opioid emergencyMichigan · Michigan establishes enduring PFAS response team · 2019-02-04Michigan establishes enduring PFAS response teamNational context · COVID-19 characterized as a pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · Pandemic Medicaid continuous-enrollment condition enacted · 2020-03-18Medicaid coverage protectionMichigan · Midland flood emergency declaration · 2020-05-19Midland flood emergency declarationMichigan · Edenville and Sanford dam failures flood Midland area · 2020-05-19Edenville and Sanford dam failures flood Midland areaMichigan · Flood emergency expands to three additional counties · 2020-05-22Flood emergency expands to three additional countiesMichigan · Flood emergency expands to Iosco County · 2020-05-26Flood emergency expands to Iosco CountyMichigan · Mid-Michigan flood emergency ends · 2020-06-16Mid-Michigan flood emergency endsNational context · FDA authorizes the first COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use · 2020-12-11First COVID vaccine EUANational context · American Rescue Plan expands Marketplace premium assistance · 2021-03-11Marketplace aid expandedNational context · No Surprises Act billing protections begin · 2022-01-01Surprise-billing protectionsNational context · Supreme Court overturns Roe and Casey in Dobbs · 2022-06-24Dobbs abortion rulingNational context · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline launches nationwide · 2022-07-16988 crisis line launchesNational context · Inflation Reduction Act signed · 2022-08-16Prescription-drug lawNational context · Medicare Part D insulin cost-sharing cap takes effect · 2023-01-01Part D insulin $35 capNational context · Medicaid coverage terminations can resume · 2023-04-01Medicaid terminations resumeNational context · Federal COVID-19 public-health emergency ends · 2023-05-11COVID health emergency endsNational context · Medicare Part D out-of-pocket cap begins · 2025-01-01Part D $2,000 cap (2025)National context · 2025 reconciliation law changes Medicaid and funds rural care · 2025-07-04Medicaid and rural-care lawNational context · Rural Health Transformation awards announced for all 50 states · 2025-12-29Rural health awardsNational context · Temporary enhanced Marketplace premium tax credits end · 2026-01-01Enhanced ACA credits endNational context · First negotiated Medicare drug prices take effect · 2026-01-01Negotiated drug prices beginNational context · CMS issues Medicaid community-engagement implementation rule · 2026-06-01Medicaid eligibility rule● Michigan Legislature · 322263233334225232255522255224223252310229236442422542323254113342432● U.S. Congress · Michigan delegation · 5322222◆ Governor · 282222■ Michigan agencies · 5722010-03-012026-09-30

460 of 460 reviewed Michigan actions match · 295 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.

Michigan · 2024: 5.1% · Rank #43 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Michigan Uninsured rate · all ages · source units
PeriodMichiganRankU.S. benchmark
20245.1%#43 of 508.2%
20234.5%#44 of 50Not available
20224.5%#44 of 50Not available
20215%#44 of 50Not available
2020Not availableUnavailableNot available
20195.8%#41 of 50Not available
20185.4%#42 of 50Not available
20175.2%#44 of 50Not available
20165.4%#40 of 50Not available
20156.1%#39 of 50Not available
20148.5%#36 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Michigan · state comparison

Who has health coverage?

Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.

Michigan · 20245.1%
Michigan rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Uninsured rate · all ages

FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Michigan
Uninsured rate · all ages history in Michigan3.9%6.5%9.1%20142024
2024 · Michigan: 5.1% · Rank #43 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Michigan Uninsured rate · all ages history
PeriodMichiganCompare
20148.5%
20156.1%
20165.4%
20175.2%
20185.4%
20195.8%
2020Not available
20215%
20224.5%
20234.5%
20245.1%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.

Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Michigan · 5.1%2024 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Texas16.7%—
#2Georgia12%—
#3Oklahoma11.5%—
#4Nevada11.4%—
#5Alaska11%—
#6Florida10.9%—
#7Arizona10.3%—
#7Wyoming10.3%—
#9New Mexico10.1%—
#10Mississippi9.7%—
#10Tennessee9.7%—
#12Arkansas9.4%—
#13Idaho9.2%—
#14South Carolina9%—
#15Montana8.8%—
#16North Carolina8.6%—
#17Kansas8.5%—
#18Utah8.3%—
#19Alabama8.2%—
#20South Dakota8.1%—
#21Colorado7.9%—
#22Louisiana7.7%—
#22Missouri7.7%—
#22New Jersey7.7%—
#25Indiana7.5%—
#26Nebraska7.1%—
#27Delaware6.9%—
#27Illinois6.9%—
#27Virginia6.9%—
#30Kentucky6.8%—
#31Ohio6.7%—
#32Washington6.5%—
#33Maryland6.3%—
#34North Dakota6.1%—
#35California5.9%—
#36Connecticut5.8%—
#36Pennsylvania5.8%—
#36West Virginia5.8%—
#39Maine5.5%—
#40Iowa5.4%—
#41Wisconsin5.3%—
#42Oregon5.2%—
#43Michigan · your comparison5.1%—
#43Minnesota5.1%—
#45New York5%—
#46Rhode Island4.6%—
#47New Hampshire4.5%—
#48Vermont4.2%—
#49Hawaii3.5%—
#50Massachusetts2.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

People under 65 without health insurance

6.2%2024 ACS annual estimate

Share of Michigan’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.

This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.

Method and limitations

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.

  • This excludes people age 65 and older and is a annual estimate rather than a current enrollment count.
  • Insurance status does not measure affordability, provider availability, coverage adequacy, or quality of care.
Michigan · state comparison

Where do healthcare dollars go?

State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Michigan with every state.

Michigan · 2020$9,897
Michigan rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Personal healthcare spending per resident

Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.

2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Michigan
Personal healthcare spending per resident history in Michigan$7.6K$9.06K$10.53K20142020
2020 · Michigan: $9,897 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Michigan Personal healthcare spending per resident history
PeriodMichiganCompare
2014$7,967
2015$8,372
2016$8,707
2017$8,940
2018$9,142
2019$9,532
2020$9,897

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.

Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Michigan · $9,8972020 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New York$14,007—
#2Alaska$13,642—
#3Massachusetts$13,319—
#4Delaware$12,899—
#5West Virginia$12,769—
#6Vermont$12,756—
#7South Dakota$12,495—
#8Connecticut$12,489—
#9Maine$12,077—
#10New Jersey$11,868—
#11New Hampshire$11,793—
#12Rhode Island$11,694—
#13Pennsylvania$11,603—
#14North Dakota$11,301—
#15Wyoming$10,989—
#16Minnesota$10,846—
#17Maryland$10,839—
#18Indiana$10,517—
#19Louisiana$10,515—
#20Nebraska$10,514—
#21Ohio$10,478—
#22California$10,299—
#23Hawaii$10,291—
#24Kentucky$10,257—
#25Montana$10,212—
#26Illinois$10,190—
#27Oregon$10,071—
#28Wisconsin$9,982—
#29Missouri$9,921—
#30Michigan · your comparison$9,897—
#31Florida$9,865—
#32Iowa$9,789—
#33Oklahoma$9,444—
#34Kansas$9,408—
#35Mississippi$9,394—
#36Arkansas$9,338—
#37Tennessee$9,336—
#38Alabama$9,280—
#39Washington$9,265—
#40Virginia$9,195—
#41North Carolina$8,917—
#42New Mexico$8,902—
#43South Carolina$8,766—
#44Georgia$8,758—
#45Arizona$8,756—
#46Colorado$8,583—
#47Texas$8,406—
#48Nevada$8,348—
#49Idaho$8,148—
#50Utah$7,522—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Michigan · state comparison

Health outcomes

Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.

Michigan · 202276.8 years
Michigan rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Life expectancy at birth

FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Michigan population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.

The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Michigan
Life expectancy at birth history in Michigan75.4 years76.9 years78.3 years20182022
2022 · Michigan: 76.8 years · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Michigan Life expectancy at birth history
PeriodMichiganCompare
201877.7 years
201978 years
202076 years
202175.7 years
202276.8 years

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.

Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Michigan · 76.8 years2022 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Hawaii80 years—
#2Massachusetts79.8 years—
#3New Jersey79.6 years—
#4New York79.5 years—
#5Connecticut79.4 years—
#6California79.3 years—
#6Minnesota79.3 years—
#8Rhode Island79.2 years—
#9Utah79 years—
#10New Hampshire78.7 years—
#11Colorado78.5 years—
#12Idaho78.4 years—
#12Washington78.4 years—
#14Nebraska78.3 years—
#14Vermont78.3 years—
#16Wisconsin78.1 years—
#17Florida77.9 years—
#17Iowa77.9 years—
#17North Dakota77.9 years—
#20Maryland77.8 years—
#21Oregon77.7 years—
#22Illinois77.5 years—
#22Virginia77.5 years—
#24Montana77.3 years—
#24Pennsylvania77.3 years—
#24South Dakota77.3 years—
#27Texas77.1 years—
#28Michigan · your comparison76.8 years—
#28Wyoming76.8 years—
#30Arizona76.7 years—
#31Maine76.6 years—
#32Delaware76.5 years—
#32Kansas76.5 years—
#34Nevada76.4 years—
#35Georgia75.9 years—
#35North Carolina75.9 years—
#37Alaska75.8 years—
#38Ohio75.6 years—
#39Indiana75.4 years—
#40Missouri75.2 years—
#41South Carolina75.1 years—
#42New Mexico74.5 years—
#43Arkansas73.9 years—
#44Alabama73.8 years—
#44Louisiana73.8 years—
#44Oklahoma73.8 years—
#44Tennessee73.8 years—
#48Kentucky73.6 years—
#49Mississippi72.6 years—
#50West Virginia72.2 years—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Michigan · state comparison

Chronic illness and health risks

Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.

Michigan · 202310.9%
Michigan rank#15among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted

Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.

Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Michigan
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history in Michigan9.3%10.2%11.1%20192023
2023 · Michigan: 10.9% · Rank #15 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Michigan Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
PeriodMichiganCompare
20199.7%
202010.7%
20219.5%
202210%
202310.9%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.

Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Michigan · 10.9%2023 · Rank #15 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 10.1% – 11.8%Selected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Michigan with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Mississippi15.1%95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1West Virginia15.1%95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3Louisiana14.6%95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4Alabama14%95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5Arkansas13.1%95% CI: 12–14.3
#6South Carolina12.7%95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6Tennessee12.7%95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8Texas12.1%95% CI: 11–13.3
#9Indiana11.7%95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10Georgia11.5%95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10Ohio11.5%95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12Oklahoma11.3%95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13Delaware11.1%95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14North Carolina11%95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15Illinois10.9%95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15Maryland10.9%95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15Michigan · your comparison10.9%95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18Nevada10.8%95% CI: 8.9–13
#18New Mexico10.8%95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20Missouri10.7%95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20South Dakota10.7%95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22California10.6%95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23Kansas10.5%95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24Virginia10.4%95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25Florida10.1%95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26Rhode Island10%95% CI: 9.1–11
#27Arizona9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27Iowa9.9%95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29Nebraska9.7%95% CI: 9–10.3
#30Wisconsin9.6%95% CI: 9–10.2
#31Hawaii9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31New York9.5%95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31Oregon9.5%95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34Wyoming9.4%95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35Minnesota9.3%95% CI: 8.6–10
#36New Jersey9.1%95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37Maine9%95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38North Dakota8.9%95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39Idaho8.7%95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40Washington8.6%95% CI: 8.2–9
#41Massachusetts8.5%95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42Connecticut8.4%95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43Alaska8.2%95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44Utah8.1%95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45Colorado8%95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46Montana7.9%95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46New Hampshire7.9%95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48Vermont7.8%95% CI: 7–8.7
—KentuckyNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—PennsylvaniaNot availableNo comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Michigan · state comparison

Where are healthcare workers in short supply?

Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.

Michigan · June 30, 202644.9%
Michigan rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Primary care · need met

HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.

National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Michigan · 44.9%June 30, 2026 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1New Jersey83.2%—
#2Vermont82.6%—
#3South Carolina79.4%—
#4New Hampshire74.8%—
#5Rhode Island74.3%—
#6Louisiana72.1%—
#7Hawaii67.1%—
#8Utah65.4%—
#9Wisconsin65.2%—
#10Alabama63%—
#11Connecticut60.3%—
#12Massachusetts58%—
#13Tennessee58%—
#14Virginia57.2%—
#15Pennsylvania56.7%—
#16Maine56%—
#17Minnesota55.4%—
#18Wyoming54.4%—
#19Indiana54.2%—
#20California53.2%—
#21Arkansas52.6%—
#22Texas49.8%—
#23Ohio49.7%—
#24Nebraska49.1%—
#25Alaska48.9%—
#26North Carolina48.1%—
#27Colorado47.5%—
#28Michigan · your comparison44.9%—
#29Oregon43.9%—
#30Idaho43.9%—
#31Washington42.4%—
#32Illinois41.5%—
#33Nevada41.5%—
#34Arizona41.2%—
#35Kansas41.1%—
#36Iowa40.5%—
#37Florida39.7%—
#38Georgia39.1%—
#39Montana38.5%—
#40West Virginia38.3%—
#41North Dakota36.5%—
#42New York35.3%—
#43South Dakota34.6%—
#44Mississippi34.1%—
#45Maryland31.6%—
#46New Mexico31.4%—
#47Kentucky30.8%—
#48Oklahoma28.6%—
#49Missouri23.7%—
#50Delaware11.2%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Michigan · state comparison

Employer coverage costs

Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.

Michigan · 2020$6,683
Michigan rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Single coverage premium · all firms

Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.

Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.

Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Michigan · $6,6832020 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Alaska$8,635—
#2New York$8,177—
#3New Hampshire$7,991—
#4Vermont$7,868—
#5Wyoming$7,743—
#6Nebraska$7,611—
#7South Carolina$7,516—
#8Connecticut$7,501—
#9Maine$7,496—
#10Massachusetts$7,452—
#11Washington$7,440—
#12New Mexico$7,424—
#13Illinois$7,376—
#14New Jersey$7,373—
#15Maryland$7,352—
#16Rhode Island$7,326—
#17Indiana$7,319—
#18Delaware$7,280—
#19Wisconsin$7,250—
#20Pennsylvania$7,246—
#21North Dakota$7,216—
#22Colorado$7,206—
#23Missouri$7,179—
#24California$7,173—
#25Florida$7,078—
#26South Dakota$7,070—
#27Oklahoma$7,058—
#28Hawaii$7,040—
#29North Carolina$7,036—
#30Texas$7,017—
#31West Virginia$6,993—
#32Ohio$6,989—
#33Kentucky$6,949—
#34Iowa$6,932—
#35Virginia$6,928—
#36Oregon$6,917—
#37Minnesota$6,910—
#38Georgia$6,876—
#39Montana$6,860—
#40Idaho$6,744—
#41Louisiana$6,713—
#42Michigan · your comparison$6,683—
#43Kansas$6,675—
#44Arizona$6,612—
#45Utah$6,593—
#46Mississippi$6,561—
#47Nevada$6,493—
#48Tennessee$6,485—
#49Arkansas$6,414—
#50Alabama$6,393—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Michigan · state comparison

Mental health and treatment

Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.

Michigan · 2023–202423.6%
Michigan rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Any Mental Illness · adults 18+

Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.

Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.

Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Michigan · 23.6%2023–2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Oregon31.6%—
#2Vermont29.1%—
#3West Virginia28.1%—
#4Washington27.9%—
#5New Hampshire27.7%—
#6Tennessee27%—
#7Utah26.7%—
#8Maine26.7%—
#9Arkansas26.6%—
#10Colorado26.4%—
#11Rhode Island25.8%—
#12Missouri25.7%—
#13Montana25.6%—
#14Indiana25.3%—
#15Kentucky25.3%—
#16Georgia25.2%—
#17Iowa25%—
#18Massachusetts24.9%—
#19Wyoming24.7%—
#20Nevada24.6%—
#21Arizona24.6%—
#22Wisconsin24.6%—
#23Idaho24.5%—
#24Nebraska24.1%—
#25Louisiana24.1%—
#26Alaska24%—
#27Pennsylvania23.9%—
#28New Mexico23.9%—
#28Ohio23.9%—
#30Connecticut23.7%—
#31Kansas23.7%—
#32Michigan · your comparison23.6%—
#33Virginia23.1%—
#34Alabama23%—
#35North Dakota23%—
#36Maryland22.7%—
#37Oklahoma22.6%—
#38Minnesota22.6%—
#39Illinois22.2%—
#40Delaware22.1%—
#41New York21.9%—
#42South Dakota21.8%—
#43California21.6%—
#44North Carolina21.4%—
#45Florida20.8%—
#46Texas20.7%—
#47Mississippi20.5%—
#48Hawaii19.8%—
#49South Carolina19.8%—
#50New Jersey18.1%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Michigan candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

107 statements from 26 candidates

2026 Michigan Governor of Michigan — General Election

3 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements

Anthony Hudson

2 statements

Libertarian · Governor of Michigan · MI

Care & public health

Mental Health Programs

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Policies

Candidate campaign source

Mental Health Programs

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Anthony Hudson campaign source 2 ↗
View 1 more statement from Anthony Hudson
Care & public health

Affordable Healthcare

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Policies

Candidate campaign source

Affordable Healthcare

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 18, 2026

Anthony Hudson campaign source 2 ↗

Jocelyn Benson

5 statements

Democratic Party · Governor of Michigan · MI

Health coverage

Healthcare should be a right, not a privilege. With all of the chaos, corruption, and confusion emerging from Washington, D.C. — where elected officials are ripping away Medicaid for hundreds of thousands of people, women's health care is under attack, and many Michiganders have to travel across mul…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

Healthcare should be a right, not a privilege. With all of the chaos, corruption, and confusion emerging from Washington, D.C. — where elected officials are ripping away Medicaid for hundreds of thousands of people, women's health care is under attack, and many Michiganders have to travel across multiple counties just to get to their doctor, a Democratic Governor in Michigan will be the last line of defense against the failings at the federal level. But I don't just want to be on defense. I want to make sure Michigan knows I have their back when it comes to getting them the quality, affordable care they need.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jocelyn Benson — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
View 4 more statements from Jocelyn Benson
Healthcare costs

My Affordable Michigan agenda will tackle the costs hitting families hardest. I will work to increase housing availability and affordability by streamlining regulations that slow down construction, incentivizing development of starter homes and affordable units, and cracking down on corporate invest…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability and family costs

Candidate campaign source

My Affordable Michigan agenda will tackle the costs hitting families hardest. I will work to increase housing availability and affordability by streamlining regulations that slow down construction, incentivizing development of starter homes and affordable units, and cracking down on corporate investors who buy up properties and drive up rents. I will fight to lower healthcare costs by increasing transparency in medical billing, passing a $5,000 caregiver tax credit, and ensuring that pharmaceutical companies can't price gouge Michigan families. And I will make childcare more accessible and affordable by bringing Rx Kids statewide and removing barriers that prevent qualified providers from opening their doors.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jocelyn Benson — candidate-owned primary source 3 ↗
Healthcare costs

But the problem runs even deeper than federal cuts. Our healthcare system has been corrupted by corporate greed, with too many decisions being made by CEOs and investors instead of doctors and patients. We need to shift the focus from profits to people. That corruption shows up in the privatization …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

But the problem runs even deeper than federal cuts. Our healthcare system has been corrupted by corporate greed, with too many decisions being made by CEOs and investors instead of doctors and patients. We need to shift the focus from profits to people. That corruption shows up in the privatization schemes and price gouging that have driven up costs for Michigan families, forcing them to make impossible decisions about when they can find a provider and what health issues they can afford to address. It shows up in sky-high prescription drug costs that prevent people from completing their treatments, and in surprise medical bills that bankrupt families who thought they were doing everything right.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jocelyn Benson — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗
Care & public health

As a mom, Jocelyn’s north star in this election is making sure Michigan is affordable for everyone so our young people, seniors, and everyone in between can stay and thrive in Michigan. She knows firsthand that government works best when it’s there when you need it, and gets out of the way when you …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: As a mom, Jocelyn’s north star in this election is making sure Michigan is affordable for everyone so our young people, seniors, and everyone in between can stay and thrive in Michigan.

Candidate campaign source

As a mom, Jocelyn’s north star in this election is making sure Michigan is affordable for everyone so our young people, seniors, and everyone in between can stay and thrive in Michigan. She knows firsthand that government works best when it’s there when you need it, and gets out of the way when you don’t. The cost of living is crushing Michiganders but Jocelyn believes that government can make life easier with the right leader as governor who will use every tool available to expand rural healthcare options, build more housing, take on the utility companies who raise our rates, make childcare free, and ensure our agencies work, so anyone can afford to live in the best place to call home.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jocelyn Benson — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
Healthcare costs

As Governor, I'll fight back. I'll work to increase options for low or no-cost preventive healthcare services across Michigan, because when people can get timely treatment, they address health issues before they become emergencies — saving lives and reducing costs. I'll push for real transparency an…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Health care

Candidate campaign source

As Governor, I'll fight back. I'll work to increase options for low or no-cost preventive healthcare services across Michigan, because when people can get timely treatment, they address health issues before they become emergencies — saving lives and reducing costs. I'll push for real transparency and accountability in prescription drug pricing through an independent Prescription Drug Affordability Board with the authority to review manufacturing practices and approve price increases. And I'll champion healthcare cost transparency legislation to end the surprise billing that makes even routine procedures unaffordable, while expanding medical debt relief for the thousands of Michiganders crushed by expenses they never saw coming

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jocelyn Benson — candidate-owned primary source 7 ↗

John James

1 statement

Republican Party · Governor of Michigan · MI

Care & public health

Affordability is John’s top priority. He’s committed to making Michigan a place where families can thrive by tackling rising housing costs, lowering the tax burden, and addressing healthcare expenses. John’s vision for Michigan is clear and disciplined: academic excellence, economic opportunity, and…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Affordability, education, public safety, and government accountability

Candidate campaign source

Affordability is John’s top priority. He’s committed to making Michigan a place where families can thrive by tackling rising housing costs, lowering the tax burden, and addressing healthcare expenses. John’s vision for Michigan is clear and disciplined: academic excellence, economic opportunity, and safe communities where families feel secure. He’ll put kids and families first when it comes to education, cut job-killing regulations, fully fund and support law enforcement, and prioritize Michigan workers and families. In Lansing, John will audit wasteful DEI programs, eliminate foreign influence in our institutions, and rebuild trust in government.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

John James — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Michigan Michigan Attorney General — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 2 statements

Jason Dye

2 statements

Libertarian · Michigan Attorney General · MI

Health coverage

Michigan’s Attorney General already has civil enforcement responsibilities involving antitrust, consumer protection, and charitable trusts. The office’s Health Care Fraud Division investigates and prosecutes Medicaid provider fraud and abuse or neglect in residential care facilities. The Department …

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Establish the Patient Protection & Corporate Accountability Initiative

Candidate campaign source

Michigan’s Attorney General already has civil enforcement responsibilities involving antitrust, consumer protection, and charitable trusts. The office’s Health Care Fraud Division investigates and prosecutes Medicaid provider fraud and abuse or neglect in residential care facilities. The Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) regulates insurance and administers Michigan’s external-review process for eligible health-insurance denials. I will connect those existing lanes through a formal, interdivisional health-care accountability initiative.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jason Dye — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗
View 1 more statement from Jason Dye
Care & public health

I am not promising to seize every private insurance company. I support creating a transparent, nonprofit public insurance option that competes alongside private plans — its surplus going toward patient care, lower premiums, reserves, or expanded benefits, not executive bonuses tied to denying treatm…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Private Choice Without Private Impunity

Candidate campaign source

I am not promising to seize every private insurance company. I support creating a transparent, nonprofit public insurance option that competes alongside private plans — its surplus going toward patient care, lower premiums, reserves, or expanded benefits, not executive bonuses tied to denying treatment. Private insurers may continue operating. They will simply have to compete against an option that is not designed primarily to extract profit from illness. That is not an attack on choice. That is the creation of an actual choice.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Jason Dye — candidate-owned primary source 4 ↗

2026 Michigan Michigan Secretary of State — General Election

2 candidates with matching statements · 2 statements

Christine Sloan

1 statement

Libertarian · Michigan Secretary of State · MI

Care & public health

Government should do less. Your rights are not negotiable. Christine believes the proper role of government is narrow and well-defined: protect individual rights, maintain essential public services, and enforce fair and consistent laws. When government overreaches — regulating personal choices, pick…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Limited Government and Individual Rights

Candidate campaign source

Government should do less. Your rights are not negotiable. Christine believes the proper role of government is narrow and well-defined: protect individual rights, maintain essential public services, and enforce fair and consistent laws. When government overreaches — regulating personal choices, picking economic winners and losers, or expanding bureaucracy for its own sake — it undermines the freedom and self-determination that make communities thrive. Over a decade in healthcare have given Christine a deep appreciation for constitutional rights and the dignity of every individual. She believes all Michiganders deserve equal protection under the law — regardless of background, belief, or circumstance. Government should be a neutral referee, not a player with its thumb on the scale.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Christine Sloan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

Democratic Party · Michigan Secretary of State · MI

Care & public health

Garlin Gilchrist is a husband, dad, a public servant, and an engineer dedicated to making government work for regular people. Now, he’s running for Secretary of State to make government work for all of us — and to protect your right to vote.Working alongside Governor Whitmer, Garlin has a proven tra…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Meet Garlin Gilchrist II

Candidate campaign source

Garlin Gilchrist is a husband, dad, a public servant, and an engineer dedicated to making government work for regular people. Now, he’s running for Secretary of State to make government work for all of us — and to protect your right to vote.Working alongside Governor Whitmer, Garlin has a proven track record of leading and delivering for Michigan. He played a leading role in delivering free pre-k for all, increasing small business success and diversifying the state economy, protecting abortion access, bringing more high-quality jobs to Michigan, reforming our justice system to create opportunity and keep communities safe, and connecting tens of thousands of Michiganders to reliable, affordable and fast internet.Garlin is committed to building a Michigan where every person can reach their full potential.As the country’s only statewide elected software engineer, Garlin has focused on making the government actually work for people, He believes it’s time for bold, fearless leadership to stand against the threats to democracy in the face of a President who acts like a king. If our democratic system doesn’t work, we lose the most important tool we have to really solve the problems every Michigander faces from unaffordable childcare, housing, and healthcare.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026

Garlin Gilchrist II — candidate-owned primary source ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 6
How statements are selected

This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Michigan candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Michigan incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Michigan legislators and Michigan’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Michigan’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

375 matching sponsorships or proposals · 113 Michigan incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Rep. Alabas Farhat

Michigan House · District 3 · D–MI

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Alabas Farhat
Michigan Legislature · HB 5303

Human services: medical services; Medicaid managed care contract with pharmacy benefit manager; modify. Amends sec. 105i of 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.105i).

Dec 9, 2025 · bill electronically reproduced 12/02/2025

Rep. Alabas Farhat · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.

The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated December 9, 2025 records: bill electronically reproduced 12/02/2025.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Human services: medical services; Medicaid managed care contract with pharmacy benefit manager; modify.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan Legislature · HB 6142

Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; cross-reference to publicly funded health insurance contribution act; eliminate. Amends sec. 6 of 2014 PA 181 (MCL 141.1636).

Nov 26, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Alabas Farhat · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.

The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated November 26, 2024 records: bill electronically reproduced 11/14/2024. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; cross-reference to publicly funded health insurance contribution act; eliminate.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan Legislature · HB 4276

Human services: medical services; Medicaid managed care contract with pharmacy benefit manager; regulate, and require reporting. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 - 400.119b) by adding secs. 105i & 105j.

Dec 31, 2023 · Enacted · Public Act 279 of 2023

Rep. Alabas Farhat · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.

The official Michigan Legislature history entry dated December 31, 2023 records: assigned PA 279'23. This is the journal entry date; the governor's approval, filing and effective dates require the complete history and act.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Human services: medical services; Medicaid managed care contract with pharmacy benefit manager; regulate, and require reporting.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan Legislature · HB 4740

State agencies (existing): health and human services; waiting period for enrollment in Medicare and immigrant children's health improvement act; modify. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 - 400.119b) by adding sec. 107c.

Oct 12, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Alabas Farhat · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement.

The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated October 12, 2023 records: referred to second reading. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on Michigan's displayed foreign-born population share.

Retained Michigan evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

State agencies (existing): health and human services; waiting period for enrollment in Medicare and immigrant children's health improvement act; modify.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Amos O'Neal

Michigan House · District 94 · D–MI

4 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Amos O'Neal
Michigan Legislature · HB 6135

Civil procedure: other; individuals convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence; enact procedures for surrender or seizure of firearms. Creates new act.

Nov 26, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Amos O'Neal · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.

The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated November 26, 2024 records: per Rule 41 referred to Committee on Military, Veterans and Homeland Security. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Civil procedure: other; individuals convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence; enact procedures for surrender or seizure of firearms.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan Legislature · HB 5458

Human services: medical services; sickle cell disease program; require Medicaid managed care organizations to participate in. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 - 400.119b) by adding sec. 106c.

Feb 21, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Amos O'Neal · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.

The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated February 21, 2024 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/20/2024. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Human services: medical services; sickle cell disease program; require Medicaid managed care organizations to participate in.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan Legislature · HB 5225

Crimes: weapons; penalties for intentionally discharging a firearm from vehicle or at a dwelling or a potentially occupied structure; increase. Amends sec. 234b of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.234b).

Oct 26, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Amos O'Neal · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.

The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated October 26, 2023 records: bill electronically reproduced 10/25/2023. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Crimes: weapons; penalties for intentionally discharging a firearm from vehicle or at a dwelling or a potentially occupied structure; increase.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan Legislature · HB 4946

Crimes: weapons; possession of firearms and ammunition by persons convicted of misdemeanor involving domestic violence; prohibit. Amends sec. 224f of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224f).

Oct 3, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Amos O'Neal · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.

The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated October 3, 2023 records: referred to second reading. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Crimes: weapons; possession of firearms and ammunition by persons convicted of misdemeanor involving domestic violence; prohibit.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Angela Rigas

Michigan House · District 79 · R–MI

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Angela Rigas
Michigan Legislature · HB 4710

Weapons: firearms; certain provisions regarding weapons; repeal. Amends secs. 231 & 237a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.231 & 750.237a) & repeals secs. 227, 227a, 227c, 227d, 231a & 234d of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.227 et seq.).

Jun 13, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Angela Rigas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.

The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated June 13, 2023 records: bill electronically reproduced 06/08/2023. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Weapons: firearms; certain provisions regarding weapons; repeal.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan Legislature · HB 4105

Health: other; certain policies and procedures for determining whether an abortion is medically indicated to protect the life or physical or mental health of a pregnant individual; require. Creates new act.

Feb 22, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Angela Rigas · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy.

The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated February 22, 2023 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/15/2023. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's reported induced-abortion count.

Retained Michigan evidence context: Induced abortions reported as occurring in Michigan. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Health: other; certain policies and procedures for determining whether an abortion is medically indicated to protect the life or physical or mental health of a pregnant individual; require.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Angela Witwer

Michigan House · District 76 · D–MI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Angela Witwer
Michigan Legislature · HB 5416

Human services: medical services; annual lead screening test for certain children enrolled in Medicaid and MIChild; require. Amends sec. 111l of 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.111l).

Apr 3, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Angela Witwer · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.

The 2021-2022 Legislature adjourned on December 28, 2022. The retained official history entry dated April 3, 2024 records: bill electronically reproduced 10/19/2021. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Human services: medical services; annual lead screening test for certain children enrolled in Medicaid and MIChild; require.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Ann Bollin

Michigan House · District 49 · R–MI

1 proposal
View proposals from Rep. Ann Bollin
Michigan Legislature · HB 5604

Appropriations: department of health and human services; appropriations for fiscal year 2026-2027 for Medicaid and behavioral health; provide for. Creates appropriation act.

Mar 3, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026

Rep. Ann Bollin · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.

The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated March 3, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Appropriations: department of health and human services; appropriations for fiscal year 2026-2027 for Medicaid and behavioral health; provide for.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Rep. Betsy Coffia

Michigan House · District 103 · D–MI

2 proposals
View proposals from Rep. Betsy Coffia
Michigan Legislature · HB 4243

Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; regional airport authorities; include in the publicly funded health insurance contribution act. Amends sec. 2 of 2011 PA 152 (MCL 15.562).

Mar 19, 2025 · bill electronically reproduced 03/18/2025

Rep. Betsy Coffia · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.

The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated March 19, 2025 records: bill electronically reproduced 03/18/2025.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; regional airport authorities; include in the publicly funded health insurance contribution act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan Legislature · HB 4618

Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; regional airport authorities; include in the publicly funded health insurance contribution act. Amends sec. 2 of 2011 PA 152 (MCL 15.562).

Apr 24, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified

Rep. Betsy Coffia · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.

The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated April 24, 2024 records: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND CONSUMER PROTECTION. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.

Why this record is included

The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.

Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; regional airport authorities; include in the publicly funded health insurance contribution act.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Michigan officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Michigan statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.