Insurance coverage, personal healthcare spending, longevity, mortality, health risks, and provider shortages.
Uninsured rate · all ages5.1%2024 · #43 of 50 · highest first
Uninsured rate · under age 656.2%2024 · #43 of 50 · highest first
Private coverage · under age 6571.8%2024 · #26 of 50 · highest first
Michigan over time
Explore Michigan readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Michigan officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Michigan effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Michigan change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Uninsured rate · all ages Michigan · source units
MichiganPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
460 of 460 reviewed Michigan actions match · 295 date markers shown. 29 major events shown separately.
Michigan · 2024: 5.1% · Rank #43 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2%
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population. ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Michigan · state comparison
Who has health coverage?
Compare ACS annual estimates for all ages or people under 65. Coverage categories can overlap and do not sum to the insured share.
Michigan · 20245.1%
Michigan rank#43among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark8.2%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Uninsured rate · all ages
FactVote uses the Census Bureau's HIC-4_ACS historical table. Rates and 90% confidence margins of error are the published ACS 1-year estimates for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.
ACS annual estimates, all ages. Standard ACS 2020 one-year data were not released; the chart leaves a gap. Survey ranks describe point estimates and do not establish significant differences.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2024 · Michigan: 5.1% · Rank #43 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 8.2% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Uninsured rate · all ages history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2014
8.5%
2015
6.1%
2016
5.4%
2017
5.2%
2018
5.4%
2019
5.8%
2020
Not available
2021
5%
2022
4.5%
2023
4.5%
2024
5.1%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 2.8%Higher value · 16.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 5.1%2024 · Rank #43 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Uninsured rate · all ages · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
16.7%
—
#2
Georgia
12%
—
#3
Oklahoma
11.5%
—
#4
Nevada
11.4%
—
#5
Alaska
11%
—
#6
Florida
10.9%
—
#7
Arizona
10.3%
—
#7
Wyoming
10.3%
—
#9
New Mexico
10.1%
—
#10
Mississippi
9.7%
—
#10
Tennessee
9.7%
—
#12
Arkansas
9.4%
—
#13
Idaho
9.2%
—
#14
South Carolina
9%
—
#15
Montana
8.8%
—
#16
North Carolina
8.6%
—
#17
Kansas
8.5%
—
#18
Utah
8.3%
—
#19
Alabama
8.2%
—
#20
South Dakota
8.1%
—
#21
Colorado
7.9%
—
#22
Louisiana
7.7%
—
#22
Missouri
7.7%
—
#22
New Jersey
7.7%
—
#25
Indiana
7.5%
—
#26
Nebraska
7.1%
—
#27
Delaware
6.9%
—
#27
Illinois
6.9%
—
#27
Virginia
6.9%
—
#30
Kentucky
6.8%
—
#31
Ohio
6.7%
—
#32
Washington
6.5%
—
#33
Maryland
6.3%
—
#34
North Dakota
6.1%
—
#35
California
5.9%
—
#36
Connecticut
5.8%
—
#36
Pennsylvania
5.8%
—
#36
West Virginia
5.8%
—
#39
Maine
5.5%
—
#40
Iowa
5.4%
—
#41
Wisconsin
5.3%
—
#42
Oregon
5.2%
—
#43
Michigan · your comparison
5.1%
—
#43
Minnesota
5.1%
—
#45
New York
5%
—
#46
Rhode Island
4.6%
—
#47
New Hampshire
4.5%
—
#48
Vermont
4.2%
—
#49
Hawaii
3.5%
—
#50
Massachusetts
2.8%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Share of Michigan’s civilian noninstitutionalized residents under age 65 who lacked comprehensive health-insurance coverage at the time of the ACS survey.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts estimate derived from the American Community Survey.
This excludes people age 65 and older and is a annual estimate rather than a current enrollment count.
Insurance status does not measure affordability, provider availability, coverage adequacy, or quality of care.
State spending is reported for 2020, the latest year available in this CMS state series. Choose a service to compare Michigan with every state.
Michigan · 2020$9,897
Michigan rank#30among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$10,191Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Personal healthcare spending per resident
Personal health care expenditure per resident, assigned to the state where the patient resides.
2020 is the last year in this CMS state series. Personal health care excludes administration, public health, and investment included in national health expenditures. This is spending by all payers, not a household bill.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2020 · Michigan: $9,897 · Rank #30 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: $10,191 · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Personal healthcare spending per resident history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2014
$7,967
2015
$8,372
2016
$8,707
2017
$8,940
2018
$9,142
2019
$9,532
2020
$9,897
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · $7.52KHigher value · $14.01KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · $9,8972020 · Rank #30 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Personal healthcare spending per resident · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New York
$14,007
—
#2
Alaska
$13,642
—
#3
Massachusetts
$13,319
—
#4
Delaware
$12,899
—
#5
West Virginia
$12,769
—
#6
Vermont
$12,756
—
#7
South Dakota
$12,495
—
#8
Connecticut
$12,489
—
#9
Maine
$12,077
—
#10
New Jersey
$11,868
—
#11
New Hampshire
$11,793
—
#12
Rhode Island
$11,694
—
#13
Pennsylvania
$11,603
—
#14
North Dakota
$11,301
—
#15
Wyoming
$10,989
—
#16
Minnesota
$10,846
—
#17
Maryland
$10,839
—
#18
Indiana
$10,517
—
#19
Louisiana
$10,515
—
#20
Nebraska
$10,514
—
#21
Ohio
$10,478
—
#22
California
$10,299
—
#23
Hawaii
$10,291
—
#24
Kentucky
$10,257
—
#25
Montana
$10,212
—
#26
Illinois
$10,190
—
#27
Oregon
$10,071
—
#28
Wisconsin
$9,982
—
#29
Missouri
$9,921
—
#30
Michigan · your comparison
$9,897
—
#31
Florida
$9,865
—
#32
Iowa
$9,789
—
#33
Oklahoma
$9,444
—
#34
Kansas
$9,408
—
#35
Mississippi
$9,394
—
#36
Arkansas
$9,338
—
#37
Tennessee
$9,336
—
#38
Alabama
$9,280
—
#39
Washington
$9,265
—
#40
Virginia
$9,195
—
#41
North Carolina
$8,917
—
#42
New Mexico
$8,902
—
#43
South Carolina
$8,766
—
#44
Georgia
$8,758
—
#45
Arizona
$8,756
—
#46
Colorado
$8,583
—
#47
Texas
$8,406
—
#48
Nevada
$8,348
—
#49
Idaho
$8,148
—
#50
Utah
$7,522
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Use age-adjusted mortality to account for different age distributions; life expectancy summarizes period death rates.
Michigan · 202276.8 years
Michigan rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark77.5 yearsSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Life expectancy at birth
FactVote uses CDC National Center for Health Statistics annual complete life-table estimates for the total Michigan population. Values are rounded to the published tenth of a year.
The latest published comparable state series ends in 2022, even though newer national life-expectancy estimates may be available. Period life expectancy summarizes current mortality rates; it is not a forecast of how long a particular person will live. The 2020 and 2021 estimates reflect the mortality shock during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2022 · Michigan: 76.8 years · Rank #28 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 77.5 years · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Life expectancy at birth history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2018
77.7 years
2019
78 years
2020
76 years
2021
75.7 years
2022
76.8 years
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 72.2 yearsHigher value · 80 yearsStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 76.8 years2022 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Life expectancy at birth · 2022 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
80 years
—
#2
Massachusetts
79.8 years
—
#3
New Jersey
79.6 years
—
#4
New York
79.5 years
—
#5
Connecticut
79.4 years
—
#6
California
79.3 years
—
#6
Minnesota
79.3 years
—
#8
Rhode Island
79.2 years
—
#9
Utah
79 years
—
#10
New Hampshire
78.7 years
—
#11
Colorado
78.5 years
—
#12
Idaho
78.4 years
—
#12
Washington
78.4 years
—
#14
Nebraska
78.3 years
—
#14
Vermont
78.3 years
—
#16
Wisconsin
78.1 years
—
#17
Florida
77.9 years
—
#17
Iowa
77.9 years
—
#17
North Dakota
77.9 years
—
#20
Maryland
77.8 years
—
#21
Oregon
77.7 years
—
#22
Illinois
77.5 years
—
#22
Virginia
77.5 years
—
#24
Montana
77.3 years
—
#24
Pennsylvania
77.3 years
—
#24
South Dakota
77.3 years
—
#27
Texas
77.1 years
—
#28
Michigan · your comparison
76.8 years
—
#28
Wyoming
76.8 years
—
#30
Arizona
76.7 years
—
#31
Maine
76.6 years
—
#32
Delaware
76.5 years
—
#32
Kansas
76.5 years
—
#34
Nevada
76.4 years
—
#35
Georgia
75.9 years
—
#35
North Carolina
75.9 years
—
#37
Alaska
75.8 years
—
#38
Ohio
75.6 years
—
#39
Indiana
75.4 years
—
#40
Missouri
75.2 years
—
#41
South Carolina
75.1 years
—
#42
New Mexico
74.5 years
—
#43
Arkansas
73.9 years
—
#44
Alabama
73.8 years
—
#44
Louisiana
73.8 years
—
#44
Oklahoma
73.8 years
—
#44
Tennessee
73.8 years
—
#48
Kentucky
73.6 years
—
#49
Mississippi
72.6 years
—
#50
West Virginia
72.2 years
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare age-adjusted adult prevalence using the same survey year and definition.
Michigan · 202310.9%
Michigan rank#15among 48 states with data
U.S. benchmark10.7%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted
Adult self-reported prevalence, age-adjusted to a common population.
Published CDC 2019–2023 series. Missing or suppressed estimates remain unranked. Confidence intervals describe sampling uncertainty; point ranks are not significance tests.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Michigan
2023 · Michigan: 10.9% · Rank #15 of 48, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 10.7% · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Michigan Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted history
Period
Michigan
Compare
2019
9.7%
2020
10.7%
2021
9.5%
2022
10%
2023
10.9%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 7.8%Higher value · 15.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 10.9%2023 · Rank #15 of 48, highest first95% confidence interval: 10.1% – 11.8%Selected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 48 ranked, 2 unavailable
Diagnosed diabetes · age adjusted · 2023 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Mississippi
15.1%
95% CI: 13.7–16.6
#1
West Virginia
15.1%
95% CI: 13.9–16.3
#3
Louisiana
14.6%
95% CI: 13.4–15.8
#4
Alabama
14%
95% CI: 12.7–15.3
#5
Arkansas
13.1%
95% CI: 12–14.3
#6
South Carolina
12.7%
95% CI: 11.9–13.6
#6
Tennessee
12.7%
95% CI: 11.7–13.8
#8
Texas
12.1%
95% CI: 11–13.3
#9
Indiana
11.7%
95% CI: 11.1–12.4
#10
Georgia
11.5%
95% CI: 10.7–12.3
#10
Ohio
11.5%
95% CI: 10.8–12.2
#12
Oklahoma
11.3%
95% CI: 10.5–12.1
#13
Delaware
11.1%
95% CI: 9.8–12.6
#14
North Carolina
11%
95% CI: 9.8–12.3
#15
Illinois
10.9%
95% CI: 9.9–12.1
#15
Maryland
10.9%
95% CI: 10.2–11.7
#15
Michigan · your comparison
10.9%
95% CI: 10.1–11.8
#18
Nevada
10.8%
95% CI: 8.9–13
#18
New Mexico
10.8%
95% CI: 9.3–12.6
#20
Missouri
10.7%
95% CI: 9.9–11.7
#20
South Dakota
10.7%
95% CI: 8.9–12.8
#22
California
10.6%
95% CI: 9.8–11.4
#23
Kansas
10.5%
95% CI: 9.7–11.3
#24
Virginia
10.4%
95% CI: 9.5–11.4
#25
Florida
10.1%
95% CI: 9.1–11.1
#26
Rhode Island
10%
95% CI: 9.1–11
#27
Arizona
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#27
Iowa
9.9%
95% CI: 9.2–10.7
#29
Nebraska
9.7%
95% CI: 9–10.3
#30
Wisconsin
9.6%
95% CI: 9–10.2
#31
Hawaii
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#31
New York
9.5%
95% CI: 8.9–10.1
#31
Oregon
9.5%
95% CI: 8.7–10.5
#34
Wyoming
9.4%
95% CI: 8.5–10.5
#35
Minnesota
9.3%
95% CI: 8.6–10
#36
New Jersey
9.1%
95% CI: 8.4–9.9
#37
Maine
9%
95% CI: 8.4–9.7
#38
North Dakota
8.9%
95% CI: 8.1–9.7
#39
Idaho
8.7%
95% CI: 7.9–9.6
#40
Washington
8.6%
95% CI: 8.2–9
#41
Massachusetts
8.5%
95% CI: 7.8–9.4
#42
Connecticut
8.4%
95% CI: 7.6–9.3
#43
Alaska
8.2%
95% CI: 7.4–9.2
#44
Utah
8.1%
95% CI: 7.5–8.7
#45
Colorado
8%
95% CI: 7.3–8.7
#46
Montana
7.9%
95% CI: 7.2–8.7
#46
New Hampshire
7.9%
95% CI: 7.1–8.8
#48
Vermont
7.8%
95% CI: 7–8.7
—
Kentucky
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
—
Pennsylvania
Not available
No comparable published observation for this period; excluded from rank.
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Compare coverage of need, practitioners needed, or affected population for each discipline.
Michigan · June 30, 202644.9%
Michigan rank#28among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark47.4%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Primary care · need met
HRSA-designated shortage areas; measures describe need within those areas, not the entire state population.
National report totals can include territories. Designation rules and populations differ by discipline; do not add disciplines. Absolute population and practitioner ranks also reflect state size.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 11.2%Higher value · 83.2%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 44.9%June 30, 2026 · Rank #28 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Primary care · need met · June 30, 2026 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
New Jersey
83.2%
—
#2
Vermont
82.6%
—
#3
South Carolina
79.4%
—
#4
New Hampshire
74.8%
—
#5
Rhode Island
74.3%
—
#6
Louisiana
72.1%
—
#7
Hawaii
67.1%
—
#8
Utah
65.4%
—
#9
Wisconsin
65.2%
—
#10
Alabama
63%
—
#11
Connecticut
60.3%
—
#12
Massachusetts
58%
—
#13
Tennessee
58%
—
#14
Virginia
57.2%
—
#15
Pennsylvania
56.7%
—
#16
Maine
56%
—
#17
Minnesota
55.4%
—
#18
Wyoming
54.4%
—
#19
Indiana
54.2%
—
#20
California
53.2%
—
#21
Arkansas
52.6%
—
#22
Texas
49.8%
—
#23
Ohio
49.7%
—
#24
Nebraska
49.1%
—
#25
Alaska
48.9%
—
#26
North Carolina
48.1%
—
#27
Colorado
47.5%
—
#28
Michigan · your comparison
44.9%
—
#29
Oregon
43.9%
—
#30
Idaho
43.9%
—
#31
Washington
42.4%
—
#32
Illinois
41.5%
—
#33
Nevada
41.5%
—
#34
Arizona
41.2%
—
#35
Kansas
41.1%
—
#36
Iowa
40.5%
—
#37
Florida
39.7%
—
#38
Georgia
39.1%
—
#39
Montana
38.5%
—
#40
West Virginia
38.3%
—
#41
North Dakota
36.5%
—
#42
New York
35.3%
—
#43
South Dakota
34.6%
—
#44
Mississippi
34.1%
—
#45
Maryland
31.6%
—
#46
New Mexico
31.4%
—
#47
Kentucky
30.8%
—
#48
Oklahoma
28.6%
—
#49
Missouri
23.7%
—
#50
Delaware
11.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Premium comparisons use a published historical all-state employer survey. Total premiums combine employer and employee payments.
Michigan · 2020$6,683
Michigan rank#42among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$7,149Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Single coverage premium · all firms
Average total annual employer-plan premium per enrolled employee at private-sector establishments offering coverage.
Historical 2020 published all-state table; not a current quote. Includes both employer and employee contributions, rather than just a worker’s payment. Survey estimates and small firm samples carry uncertainty. Missing estimates remain unavailable.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · $6.39KHigher value · $8.64KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · $6,6832020 · Rank #42 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Single coverage premium · all firms · 2020 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Alaska
$8,635
—
#2
New York
$8,177
—
#3
New Hampshire
$7,991
—
#4
Vermont
$7,868
—
#5
Wyoming
$7,743
—
#6
Nebraska
$7,611
—
#7
South Carolina
$7,516
—
#8
Connecticut
$7,501
—
#9
Maine
$7,496
—
#10
Massachusetts
$7,452
—
#11
Washington
$7,440
—
#12
New Mexico
$7,424
—
#13
Illinois
$7,376
—
#14
New Jersey
$7,373
—
#15
Maryland
$7,352
—
#16
Rhode Island
$7,326
—
#17
Indiana
$7,319
—
#18
Delaware
$7,280
—
#19
Wisconsin
$7,250
—
#20
Pennsylvania
$7,246
—
#21
North Dakota
$7,216
—
#22
Colorado
$7,206
—
#23
Missouri
$7,179
—
#24
California
$7,173
—
#25
Florida
$7,078
—
#26
South Dakota
$7,070
—
#27
Oklahoma
$7,058
—
#28
Hawaii
$7,040
—
#29
North Carolina
$7,036
—
#30
Texas
$7,017
—
#31
West Virginia
$6,993
—
#32
Ohio
$6,989
—
#33
Kentucky
$6,949
—
#34
Iowa
$6,932
—
#35
Virginia
$6,928
—
#36
Oregon
$6,917
—
#37
Minnesota
$6,910
—
#38
Georgia
$6,876
—
#39
Montana
$6,860
—
#40
Idaho
$6,744
—
#41
Louisiana
$6,713
—
#42
Michigan · your comparison
$6,683
—
#43
Kansas
$6,675
—
#44
Arizona
$6,612
—
#45
Utah
$6,593
—
#46
Mississippi
$6,561
—
#47
Nevada
$6,493
—
#48
Tennessee
$6,485
—
#49
Arkansas
$6,414
—
#50
Alabama
$6,393
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Adult statewide estimates use the same SAMHSA model and survey period. Treatment use is a share of all adults, not a share of adults with mental illness.
Michigan · 2023–202423.6%
Michigan rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark23.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+
Civilian noninstitutionalized adults age 18+, past-year prevalence or treatment use, estimated by small-area survey models.
Mental illness and depression estimates pool 2023–2024; treatment use covers 2024 only. Definitions and model-based uncertainty differ from the national page’s annual 2025 survey estimates. Point-estimate ranks do not establish significant differences. Serious mental illness is a subset of any mental illness, so their percentages must not be added.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Lower value · 18.1%Higher value · 31.6%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Michigan · 23.6%2023–2024 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Michigan with every state · 50 ranked
Any Mental Illness · adults 18+ · 2023–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Oregon
31.6%
—
#2
Vermont
29.1%
—
#3
West Virginia
28.1%
—
#4
Washington
27.9%
—
#5
New Hampshire
27.7%
—
#6
Tennessee
27%
—
#7
Utah
26.7%
—
#8
Maine
26.7%
—
#9
Arkansas
26.6%
—
#10
Colorado
26.4%
—
#11
Rhode Island
25.8%
—
#12
Missouri
25.7%
—
#13
Montana
25.6%
—
#14
Indiana
25.3%
—
#15
Kentucky
25.3%
—
#16
Georgia
25.2%
—
#17
Iowa
25%
—
#18
Massachusetts
24.9%
—
#19
Wyoming
24.7%
—
#20
Nevada
24.6%
—
#21
Arizona
24.6%
—
#22
Wisconsin
24.6%
—
#23
Idaho
24.5%
—
#24
Nebraska
24.1%
—
#25
Louisiana
24.1%
—
#26
Alaska
24%
—
#27
Pennsylvania
23.9%
—
#28
New Mexico
23.9%
—
#28
Ohio
23.9%
—
#30
Connecticut
23.7%
—
#31
Kansas
23.7%
—
#32
Michigan · your comparison
23.6%
—
#33
Virginia
23.1%
—
#34
Alabama
23%
—
#35
North Dakota
23%
—
#36
Maryland
22.7%
—
#37
Oklahoma
22.6%
—
#38
Minnesota
22.6%
—
#39
Illinois
22.2%
—
#40
Delaware
22.1%
—
#41
New York
21.9%
—
#42
South Dakota
21.8%
—
#43
California
21.6%
—
#44
North Carolina
21.4%
—
#45
Florida
20.8%
—
#46
Texas
20.7%
—
#47
Mississippi
20.5%
—
#48
Hawaii
19.8%
—
#49
South Carolina
19.8%
—
#50
New Jersey
18.1%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
460 of 460 reviewed Michigan actions · newest first
Sep 1, 2026 · HB 6285 · Weapons: firearms; regulations regarding silencers, shotguns, and short-barreled rifles; eliminate. Amends secs. 222, 224 & 231 of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.222 et seq.) & repeals sec. 224b of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.24b). · bill electronically reproduced 08/27/2026Michigan Legislature · HB 6285
Weapons: firearms; regulations regarding silencers, shotguns, and short-barreled rifles; eliminate. Amends secs. 222, 224 & 231 of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.222 et seq.) & repeals sec. 224b of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.24b).
Sep 1, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 08/27/2026
Rep. James DeSana · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated September 1, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 08/27/2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Weapons: firearms; regulations regarding silencers, shotguns, and short-barreled rifles; eliminate.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Sep 1, 2026 · HB 6284 · Weapons: firearms; sentencing guidelines; update. Amends sec. 16m of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.16m). TIE BAR WITH: HB 6285'26 · bill electronically reproduced 08/27/2026Michigan Legislature · HB 6284
Weapons: firearms; sentencing guidelines; update. Amends sec. 16m of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.16m). TIE BAR WITH: HB 6285'26
Sep 1, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 08/27/2026
Rep. Mike Hoadley · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated September 1, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 08/27/2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 20, 2026 · H.R.10133 · Fair Prescription Pricing Act of 2026 · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Michigan delegation · H.R.10133
Fair Prescription Pricing Act of 2026
Aug 20, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Hillary J. Scholten · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Limitation on cost sharing for drugs (a) In general For plan years beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this section, a group health plan, and a health insurance issuer offering group coverage, may not impose cost sharing (including deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments) with respect to a covered outpatient drug for which benefits are available under such plan or coverage dispensed by an in-network pharmacy in an amount that exceeds the nationwide average of consumer purchase prices for such drug…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 10, 2026 · S.2542 · Federal Building Threat Notification Act · Passed the SenateU.S. Congress · Michigan delegation · S.2542
Federal Building Threat Notification Act
Aug 10, 2026 · Passed the Senate
Sen. Gary C. Peters · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.
Held at the desk.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Guidance for buildings (a) Definition In this section, the term law enforcement-related means requiring a law enforcement response. (b) Guidance (1) In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Federal Protective Service shall, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, develop and implement guidance for emergency communication regarding law enforcement-related events for Federal tenants in buildings under the protection of the Federal Protective…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 3, 2026 · H.Res.1469 · Condemning a legal opinion issued by the U.S. Department of Justice on June 18, 2026, regarding the Olmstead v. L.C., the 1999 Supreme Court decision that recognized institutional isolation of people with disabilities as discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act. · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Michigan delegation · H.Res.1469
Condemning a legal opinion issued by the U.S. Department of Justice on June 18, 2026, regarding the Olmstead v. L.C., the 1999 Supreme Court decision that recognized institutional isolation of people with disabilities as discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Aug 3, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Debbie Dingell · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
L.C., 527 U.S. 581 (1999) (referred to in this resolution as the Olmstead decision), held that under the ADA, States must offer qualified individuals with disabilities the choice to receive their long-term services and support in a community-based setting; Whereas the Supreme Court recognized in the Olmstead decision that institutional placement of persons who can handle and benefit from community settings perpetuates unwarranted assumptions that persons so isolated are incapable or unworthy of participating in…
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jul 30, 2026 · Legal action · AG Nessel Files Lawsuit Against Nursing Home Operator for Violating Medicaid False Claim Act, Failure of Care of Residents · Official action recordedMichigan agencies · Legal action
AG Nessel Files Lawsuit Against Nursing Home Operator for Violating Medicaid False Claim Act, Failure of Care of Residents
Jul 30, 2026 · Official action recorded
Attorney General Dana Nessel · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
LANSING – Today, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced a civil cause of action (PDF) filed against Fahim Uddin, Pioneer Health Care Management doing business as Legacy Healthcare Management, and nine nursing home facilities located throughout southeast Michigan for violations of the Michigan Medicaid False Claim Act. The complaint alleges Uddin and his companies accepted more than $111 million in Medicaid reimbursement while failing to maintain staffing levels necessary to provide the services for which they billed. The Attorney General contends that this intentional failure of care placed hundreds of nursing home patients at risk of harm while Uddin operated related companies to…
Attorney General of Michigan published this official action on 2026-07-30.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
AG Nessel Files Lawsuit Against Nursing Home Operator for Violating Medicaid False Claim Act, Failure of Care of Residents LANSING – Today, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced a civil cause of action (PDF) filed against Fahim Uddin, Pioneer Health Care Management doing business as Legacy Healthcare Management, and nine nursing home facilities located throughout southeast Michigan for violations of the Michigan Medicaid False Claim Act.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Michigan officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health from FactVote’s Michigan candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
107 statements from 26 candidates
2026 Michigan Governor of Michigan — General Election
3 candidates with matching statements · 8 statements
Healthcare should be a right, not a privilege. With all of the chaos, corruption, and confusion emerging from Washington, D.C. — where elected officials are ripping away Medicaid for hundreds of thousands of people, women's health care is under attack, and many Michiganders have to travel across mul…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Healthcare should be a right, not a privilege. With all of the chaos, corruption, and confusion emerging from Washington, D.C. — where elected officials are ripping away Medicaid for hundreds of thousands of people, women's health care is under attack, and many Michiganders have to travel across multiple counties just to get to their doctor, a Democratic Governor in Michigan will be the last line of defense against the failings at the federal level. But I don't just want to be on defense. I want to make sure Michigan knows I have their back when it comes to getting them the quality, affordable care they need.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
My Affordable Michigan agenda will tackle the costs hitting families hardest. I will work to increase housing availability and affordability by streamlining regulations that slow down construction, incentivizing development of starter homes and affordable units, and cracking down on corporate invest…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Affordability and family costs
Candidate campaign source
My Affordable Michigan agenda will tackle the costs hitting families hardest. I will work to increase housing availability and affordability by streamlining regulations that slow down construction, incentivizing development of starter homes and affordable units, and cracking down on corporate investors who buy up properties and drive up rents. I will fight to lower healthcare costs by increasing transparency in medical billing, passing a $5,000 caregiver tax credit, and ensuring that pharmaceutical companies can't price gouge Michigan families. And I will make childcare more accessible and affordable by bringing Rx Kids statewide and removing barriers that prevent qualified providers from opening their doors.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
But the problem runs even deeper than federal cuts. Our healthcare system has been corrupted by corporate greed, with too many decisions being made by CEOs and investors instead of doctors and patients. We need to shift the focus from profits to people. That corruption shows up in the privatization …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
But the problem runs even deeper than federal cuts. Our healthcare system has been corrupted by corporate greed, with too many decisions being made by CEOs and investors instead of doctors and patients. We need to shift the focus from profits to people. That corruption shows up in the privatization schemes and price gouging that have driven up costs for Michigan families, forcing them to make impossible decisions about when they can find a provider and what health issues they can afford to address. It shows up in sky-high prescription drug costs that prevent people from completing their treatments, and in surprise medical bills that bankrupt families who thought they were doing everything right.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As a mom, Jocelyn’s north star in this election is making sure Michigan is affordable for everyone so our young people, seniors, and everyone in between can stay and thrive in Michigan. She knows firsthand that government works best when it’s there when you need it, and gets out of the way when you …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: As a mom, Jocelyn’s north star in this election is making sure Michigan is affordable for everyone so our young people, seniors, and everyone in between can stay and thrive in Michigan.
Candidate campaign source
As a mom, Jocelyn’s north star in this election is making sure Michigan is affordable for everyone so our young people, seniors, and everyone in between can stay and thrive in Michigan. She knows firsthand that government works best when it’s there when you need it, and gets out of the way when you don’t. The cost of living is crushing Michiganders but Jocelyn believes that government can make life easier with the right leader as governor who will use every tool available to expand rural healthcare options, build more housing, take on the utility companies who raise our rates, make childcare free, and ensure our agencies work, so anyone can afford to live in the best place to call home.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
As Governor, I'll fight back. I'll work to increase options for low or no-cost preventive healthcare services across Michigan, because when people can get timely treatment, they address health issues before they become emergencies — saving lives and reducing costs. I'll push for real transparency an…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
As Governor, I'll fight back. I'll work to increase options for low or no-cost preventive healthcare services across Michigan, because when people can get timely treatment, they address health issues before they become emergencies — saving lives and reducing costs. I'll push for real transparency and accountability in prescription drug pricing through an independent Prescription Drug Affordability Board with the authority to review manufacturing practices and approve price increases. And I'll champion healthcare cost transparency legislation to end the surprise billing that makes even routine procedures unaffordable, while expanding medical debt relief for the thousands of Michiganders crushed by expenses they never saw coming
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Affordability is John’s top priority. He’s committed to making Michigan a place where families can thrive by tackling rising housing costs, lowering the tax burden, and addressing healthcare expenses. John’s vision for Michigan is clear and disciplined: academic excellence, economic opportunity, and…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Affordability, education, public safety, and government accountability
Candidate campaign source
Affordability is John’s top priority. He’s committed to making Michigan a place where families can thrive by tackling rising housing costs, lowering the tax burden, and addressing healthcare expenses. John’s vision for Michigan is clear and disciplined: academic excellence, economic opportunity, and safe communities where families feel secure. He’ll put kids and families first when it comes to education, cut job-killing regulations, fully fund and support law enforcement, and prioritize Michigan workers and families. In Lansing, John will audit wasteful DEI programs, eliminate foreign influence in our institutions, and rebuild trust in government.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Michigan’s Attorney General already has civil enforcement responsibilities involving antitrust, consumer protection, and charitable trusts. The office’s Health Care Fraud Division investigates and prosecutes Medicaid provider fraud and abuse or neglect in residential care facilities. The Department …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Establish the Patient Protection & Corporate Accountability Initiative
Candidate campaign source
Michigan’s Attorney General already has civil enforcement responsibilities involving antitrust, consumer protection, and charitable trusts. The office’s Health Care Fraud Division investigates and prosecutes Medicaid provider fraud and abuse or neglect in residential care facilities. The Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) regulates insurance and administers Michigan’s external-review process for eligible health-insurance denials. I will connect those existing lanes through a formal, interdivisional health-care accountability initiative.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
I am not promising to seize every private insurance company. I support creating a transparent, nonprofit public insurance option that competes alongside private plans — its surplus going toward patient care, lower premiums, reserves, or expanded benefits, not executive bonuses tied to denying treatm…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Private Choice Without Private Impunity
Candidate campaign source
I am not promising to seize every private insurance company. I support creating a transparent, nonprofit public insurance option that competes alongside private plans — its surplus going toward patient care, lower premiums, reserves, or expanded benefits, not executive bonuses tied to denying treatment. Private insurers may continue operating. They will simply have to compete against an option that is not designed primarily to extract profit from illness. That is not an attack on choice. That is the creation of an actual choice.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Government should do less. Your rights are not negotiable. Christine believes the proper role of government is narrow and well-defined: protect individual rights, maintain essential public services, and enforce fair and consistent laws. When government overreaches — regulating personal choices, pick…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Limited Government and Individual Rights
Candidate campaign source
Government should do less. Your rights are not negotiable. Christine believes the proper role of government is narrow and well-defined: protect individual rights, maintain essential public services, and enforce fair and consistent laws. When government overreaches — regulating personal choices, picking economic winners and losers, or expanding bureaucracy for its own sake — it undermines the freedom and self-determination that make communities thrive. Over a decade in healthcare have given Christine a deep appreciation for constitutional rights and the dignity of every individual. She believes all Michiganders deserve equal protection under the law — regardless of background, belief, or circumstance. Government should be a neutral referee, not a player with its thumb on the scale.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026
Democratic Party · Michigan Secretary of State · MI
Care & public health
Garlin Gilchrist is a husband, dad, a public servant, and an engineer dedicated to making government work for regular people. Now, he’s running for Secretary of State to make government work for all of us — and to protect your right to vote.Working alongside Governor Whitmer, Garlin has a proven tra…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Meet Garlin Gilchrist II
Candidate campaign source
Garlin Gilchrist is a husband, dad, a public servant, and an engineer dedicated to making government work for regular people. Now, he’s running for Secretary of State to make government work for all of us — and to protect your right to vote.Working alongside Governor Whitmer, Garlin has a proven track record of leading and delivering for Michigan. He played a leading role in delivering free pre-k for all, increasing small business success and diversifying the state economy, protecting abortion access, bringing more high-quality jobs to Michigan, reforming our justice system to create opportunity and keep communities safe, and connecting tens of thousands of Michiganders to reliable, affordable and fast internet.Garlin is committed to building a Michigan where every person can reach their full potential.As the country’s only statewide elected software engineer, Garlin has focused on making the government actually work for people, He believes it’s time for bold, fearless leadership to stand against the threats to democracy in the face of a President who acts like a king. If our democratic system doesn’t work, we lose the most important tool we have to really solve the problems every Michigander faces from unaffordable childcare, housing, and healthcare.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 17, 2026
This section matches specific health coverage, healthcare costs, access to care and public health terms in retained, attributed source text from published Michigan candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Michigan incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Michigan legislators and Michigan’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Michigan’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
375 matching sponsorships or proposals · 113 Michigan incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Human services: medical services; Medicaid managed care contract with pharmacy benefit manager; modify. Amends sec. 105i of 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.105i).
Dec 9, 2025 · bill electronically reproduced 12/02/2025
Rep. Alabas Farhat · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated December 9, 2025 records: bill electronically reproduced 12/02/2025.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Human services: medical services; Medicaid managed care contract with pharmacy benefit manager; modify.
Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; cross-reference to publicly funded health insurance contribution act; eliminate. Amends sec. 6 of 2014 PA 181 (MCL 141.1636).
Nov 26, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Alabas Farhat · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated November 26, 2024 records: bill electronically reproduced 11/14/2024. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; cross-reference to publicly funded health insurance contribution act; eliminate.
Human services: medical services; Medicaid managed care contract with pharmacy benefit manager; regulate, and require reporting. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 - 400.119b) by adding secs. 105i & 105j.
Dec 31, 2023 · Enacted · Public Act 279 of 2023
Rep. Alabas Farhat · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The official Michigan Legislature history entry dated December 31, 2023 records: assigned PA 279'23. This is the journal entry date; the governor's approval, filing and effective dates require the complete history and act.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Human services: medical services; Medicaid managed care contract with pharmacy benefit manager; regulate, and require reporting.
State agencies (existing): health and human services; waiting period for enrollment in Medicare and immigrant children's health improvement act; modify. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 - 400.119b) by adding sec. 107c.
Oct 12, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Alabas Farhat · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated October 12, 2023 records: referred to second reading. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses immigration status, immigrant services, asylum, deportation, or immigration enforcement. It does not update or establish an effect on Michigan's displayed foreign-born population share.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
State agencies (existing): health and human services; waiting period for enrollment in Medicare and immigrant children's health improvement act; modify.
Civil procedure: other; individuals convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence; enact procedures for surrender or seizure of firearms. Creates new act.
Nov 26, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Amos O'Neal · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated November 26, 2024 records: per Rule 41 referred to Committee on Military, Veterans and Homeland Security. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Civil procedure: other; individuals convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence; enact procedures for surrender or seizure of firearms.
Human services: medical services; sickle cell disease program; require Medicaid managed care organizations to participate in. Amends 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.1 - 400.119b) by adding sec. 106c.
Feb 21, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Amos O'Neal · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated February 21, 2024 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/20/2024. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Human services: medical services; sickle cell disease program; require Medicaid managed care organizations to participate in.
Crimes: weapons; penalties for intentionally discharging a firearm from vehicle or at a dwelling or a potentially occupied structure; increase. Amends sec. 234b of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.234b).
Oct 26, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Amos O'Neal · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated October 26, 2023 records: bill electronically reproduced 10/25/2023. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Crimes: weapons; penalties for intentionally discharging a firearm from vehicle or at a dwelling or a potentially occupied structure; increase.
Crimes: weapons; possession of firearms and ammunition by persons convicted of misdemeanor involving domestic violence; prohibit. Amends sec. 224f of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224f).
Oct 3, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Amos O'Neal · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated October 3, 2023 records: referred to second reading. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Crimes: weapons; possession of firearms and ammunition by persons convicted of misdemeanor involving domestic violence; prohibit.
Weapons: firearms; certain provisions regarding weapons; repeal. Amends secs. 231 & 237a of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.231 & 750.237a) & repeals secs. 227, 227a, 227c, 227d, 231a & 234d of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.227 et seq.).
Jun 13, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Angela Rigas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated June 13, 2023 records: bill electronically reproduced 06/08/2023. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Weapons: firearms; certain provisions regarding weapons; repeal.
Health: other; certain policies and procedures for determining whether an abortion is medically indicated to protect the life or physical or mental health of a pregnant individual; require. Creates new act.
Feb 22, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Angela Rigas · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated February 22, 2023 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/15/2023. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's reported induced-abortion count.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Induced abortions reported as occurring in Michigan. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Health: other; certain policies and procedures for determining whether an abortion is medically indicated to protect the life or physical or mental health of a pregnant individual; require.
Human services: medical services; annual lead screening test for certain children enrolled in Medicaid and MIChild; require. Amends sec. 111l of 1939 PA 280 (MCL 400.111l).
Apr 3, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Angela Witwer · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The 2021-2022 Legislature adjourned on December 28, 2022. The retained official history entry dated April 3, 2024 records: bill electronically reproduced 10/19/2021. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Human services: medical services; annual lead screening test for certain children enrolled in Medicaid and MIChild; require.
1 proposalView proposals from Rep. Ann BollinMichigan Legislature · HB 5604
Appropriations: department of health and human services; appropriations for fiscal year 2026-2027 for Medicaid and behavioral health; provide for. Creates appropriation act.
Mar 3, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026
Rep. Ann Bollin · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated March 3, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: department of health and human services; appropriations for fiscal year 2026-2027 for Medicaid and behavioral health; provide for.
Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; regional airport authorities; include in the publicly funded health insurance contribution act. Amends sec. 2 of 2011 PA 152 (MCL 15.562).
Mar 19, 2025 · bill electronically reproduced 03/18/2025
Rep. Betsy Coffia · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated March 19, 2025 records: bill electronically reproduced 03/18/2025.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; regional airport authorities; include in the publicly funded health insurance contribution act.
Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; regional airport authorities; include in the publicly funded health insurance contribution act. Amends sec. 2 of 2011 PA 152 (MCL 15.562).
Apr 24, 2024 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Betsy Coffia · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated April 24, 2024 records: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND CONSUMER PROTECTION. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
Why this record is included
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; regional airport authorities; include in the publicly funded health insurance contribution act.
Only current Michigan officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Michigan statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Michigan snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Michigan, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.