Michigan state-government finances, comparable debt and interest figures, and the enacted budget.
The national companion measures federal finances. Here the unit is Michigan state government. Federal debt is not allocated to Michigan; a state budget is not the federal budget.
Explore Michigan readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Michigan officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Michigan effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Michigan change.
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
No comparable time series is retained for this topic. The chart shows events and reviewed actions; current state comparisons appear below.
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
43 of 43 reviewed Michigan actions match · 38 date markers shown. 55 major events shown separately.
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Compare state-government balances and interest expenditure from the same Census fiscal-year survey.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Long-term debt outstanding plus short-term debt outstanding at fiscal year end.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. Excludes local-government debt. Dollar ranks describe scale, not credit quality.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $166.39B | — |
| #2 | New York | $120.59B | — |
| #3 | Texas | $70.05B | — |
| #4 | Massachusetts | $65.87B | — |
| #5 | New Jersey | $57.23B | — |
| #6 | Pennsylvania | $48.67B | — |
| #7 | Illinois | $43.38B | — |
| #8 | Virginia | $33.73B | — |
| #9 | Connecticut | $33.27B | — |
| #10 | Ohio | $32.29B | — |
| #11 | Washington | $30.62B | — |
| #12 | Maryland | $25.9B | — |
| #13 | Michigan · your comparison | $25.02B | — |
| #14 | Colorado | $23.57B | — |
| #15 | Wisconsin | $22.79B | — |
| #16 | Florida | $20.14B | — |
| #17 | Minnesota | $17.03B | — |
| #18 | Oregon | $16.91B | — |
| #19 | Louisiana | $16.09B | — |
| #20 | South Carolina | $15.36B | — |
| #21 | West Virginia | $15.08B | — |
| #22 | Georgia | $14.05B | — |
| #23 | North Carolina | $13.13B | — |
| #24 | Hawaii | $11.72B | — |
| #25 | Rhode Island | $11.41B | — |
| #26 | Alabama | $10.99B | — |
| #27 | Oklahoma | $10.15B | — |
| #28 | Kentucky | $10.08B | — |
| #29 | Tennessee | $9.03B | — |
| #30 | Indiana | $8.52B | — |
| #31 | Iowa | $8.06B | — |
| #32 | Arkansas | $8.05B | — |
| #33 | Mississippi | $7.72B | — |
| #34 | New Hampshire | $7.58B | — |
| #35 | Kansas | $7.16B | — |
| #36 | New Mexico | $7.12B | — |
| #37 | Missouri | $6.99B | — |
| #38 | Arizona | $6.88B | — |
| #39 | Alaska | $5.72B | — |
| #40 | Utah | $5.55B | — |
| #41 | Maine | $5.3B | — |
| #42 | North Dakota | $4.89B | — |
| #43 | South Dakota | $4.67B | — |
| #44 | Delaware | $3.69B | — |
| #45 | Nebraska | $3.39B | — |
| #46 | Nevada | $2.89B | — |
| #47 | Montana | $2.76B | — |
| #48 | Vermont | $2.67B | — |
| #49 | Wyoming | $1.26B | — |
| #50 | Idaho | $728.59M | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
All measures use Census state-government records for FY2024. Categories describe collections; they do not rank statutory tax rates.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Census category T09.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Texas | $54.35B | — |
| #2 | California | $53.33B | — |
| #3 | Florida | $40.09B | — |
| #4 | Washington | $22.81B | — |
| #5 | New York | $19.99B | — |
| #6 | Ohio | $16.33B | — |
| #7 | Illinois | $16.05B | — |
| #8 | Pennsylvania | $15.6B | — |
| #9 | New Jersey | $14.31B | — |
| #10 | Tennessee | $14.08B | — |
| #11 | Arizona | $13.16B | — |
| #12 | Michigan · your comparison | $12.7B | — |
| #13 | North Carolina | $12.16B | — |
| #14 | Indiana | $10.96B | — |
| #15 | Massachusetts | $9.4B | — |
| #16 | Georgia | $9.01B | — |
| #17 | Minnesota | $8.49B | — |
| #18 | Nevada | $8.4B | — |
| #19 | Wisconsin | $7.59B | — |
| #20 | Virginia | $7.4B | — |
| #21 | Maryland | $6.85B | — |
| #22 | South Carolina | $6.44B | — |
| #23 | Connecticut | $6.23B | — |
| #24 | Kentucky | $5.8B | — |
| #25 | Missouri | $5.26B | — |
| #26 | Mississippi | $5.07B | — |
| #27 | Arkansas | $5.07B | — |
| #28 | Louisiana | $4.87B | — |
| #29 | Hawaii | $4.79B | — |
| #30 | Colorado | $4.67B | — |
| #31 | Iowa | $4.64B | — |
| #32 | Utah | $4.63B | — |
| #33 | Alabama | $4.59B | — |
| #34 | Kansas | $4.33B | — |
| #35 | New Mexico | $4.33B | — |
| #36 | Oklahoma | $3.81B | — |
| #37 | Idaho | $3.09B | — |
| #38 | Nebraska | $2.97B | — |
| #39 | Maine | $2.35B | — |
| #40 | West Virginia | $1.82B | — |
| #41 | South Dakota | $1.68B | — |
| #42 | Rhode Island | $1.63B | — |
| #43 | Oregon | $1.34B | — |
| #44 | North Dakota | $1.32B | — |
| #45 | Wyoming | $1.01B | — |
| #46 | Vermont | $597.33M | — |
| #47 | Alaska | $0 | — |
| #47 | Delaware | $0 | — |
| #47 | Montana | $0 | — |
| #47 | New Hampshire | $0 | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Census categories allow consistent comparisons. These selected categories are not a breakdown of the current Michigan appropriations act.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Current operations for public welfare institutions and other public welfare, excluding capital and transfers.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $156.71B | — |
| #2 | New York | $97.35B | — |
| #3 | Texas | $57.32B | — |
| #4 | Illinois | $41.13B | — |
| #5 | Florida | $40.11B | — |
| #6 | Ohio | $39.77B | — |
| #7 | Pennsylvania | $39.34B | — |
| #8 | Massachusetts | $34.12B | — |
| #9 | North Carolina | $30.64B | — |
| #10 | New Jersey | $28.06B | — |
| #11 | Arizona | $26.02B | — |
| #12 | Michigan · your comparison | $24.37B | — |
| #13 | Virginia | $23.68B | — |
| #14 | Minnesota | $23.37B | — |
| #15 | Indiana | $22.93B | — |
| #16 | Maryland | $21.61B | — |
| #17 | Kentucky | $20.54B | — |
| #18 | Oregon | $20.47B | — |
| #19 | Washington | $19.6B | — |
| #20 | Georgia | $18.99B | — |
| #21 | Louisiana | $18.69B | — |
| #22 | Tennessee | $16.42B | — |
| #23 | Wisconsin | $16.26B | — |
| #24 | Missouri | $15.65B | — |
| #25 | Oklahoma | $14.57B | — |
| #26 | Colorado | $13.6B | — |
| #27 | South Carolina | $12.84B | — |
| #28 | New Mexico | $10.72B | — |
| #29 | Iowa | $10.26B | — |
| #30 | Alabama | $9.73B | — |
| #31 | Arkansas | $8.67B | — |
| #32 | Mississippi | $8.08B | — |
| #33 | Utah | $6.91B | — |
| #34 | Kansas | $6.84B | — |
| #35 | Nevada | $6.62B | — |
| #36 | West Virginia | $6.24B | — |
| #37 | Maine | $5.7B | — |
| #38 | Nebraska | $4.97B | — |
| #39 | Connecticut | $4.88B | — |
| #40 | Rhode Island | $4.54B | — |
| #41 | Hawaii | $4.14B | — |
| #42 | Delaware | $3.97B | — |
| #43 | Idaho | $3.73B | — |
| #44 | Alaska | $3.27B | — |
| #45 | Montana | $2.89B | — |
| #46 | New Hampshire | $2.72B | — |
| #47 | Vermont | $2.69B | — |
| #48 | North Dakota | $2.09B | — |
| #49 | South Dakota | $1.95B | — |
| #50 | Wyoming | $1.09B | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
The enacted plan, spending categories and audited activity use different periods and accounting scopes; they are kept separate.
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Sum of Census current-operation expenditure categories, excluding capital outlay, interest, and assistance/subsidy expenditure.
State governments only, Census level 2; amounts converted from thousands to dollars. Fiscal-year ending dates differ among states. This FY2024 comparison differs in scope and period from Michigan’s FY2027 appropriations and Fiscal year ended September 30, 2025 audit shown below.
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Michigan stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Michigan has a dark outline.
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
| Rank | State | Value | Comparison notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | California | $287.03B | — |
| #2 | New York | $161.37B | — |
| #3 | Texas | $136.18B | — |
| #4 | Florida | $86.61B | — |
| #5 | Pennsylvania | $77.15B | — |
| #6 | Illinois | $75.67B | — |
| #7 | Ohio | $66.77B | — |
| #8 | New Jersey | $64.53B | — |
| #9 | Massachusetts | $61.38B | — |
| #10 | North Carolina | $59.01B | — |
| #11 | Michigan · your comparison | $57.27B | — |
| #12 | Virginia | $53.45B | — |
| #13 | Washington | $49.82B | — |
| #14 | Georgia | $45.19B | — |
| #15 | Maryland | $45.06B | — |
| #16 | Oregon | $41.41B | — |
| #17 | Arizona | $38.71B | — |
| #18 | Minnesota | $38.1B | — |
| #19 | Indiana | $37.4B | — |
| #20 | Kentucky | $36.94B | — |
| #21 | Wisconsin | $34.5B | — |
| #22 | Missouri | $34.43B | — |
| #23 | South Carolina | $32.85B | — |
| #24 | Colorado | $32.73B | — |
| #25 | Louisiana | $31.67B | — |
| #26 | Tennessee | $31.12B | — |
| #27 | Alabama | $26.99B | — |
| #28 | Oklahoma | $24.28B | — |
| #29 | Utah | $22.7B | — |
| #30 | New Mexico | $21.94B | — |
| #31 | Connecticut | $21.22B | — |
| #32 | Iowa | $19.89B | — |
| #33 | Kansas | $18.39B | — |
| #34 | Hawaii | $16.62B | — |
| #35 | Mississippi | $16.46B | — |
| #36 | Arkansas | $16.28B | — |
| #37 | West Virginia | $13.19B | — |
| #38 | Nevada | $12.43B | — |
| #39 | Nebraska | $10.41B | — |
| #40 | Maine | $10.12B | — |
| #41 | Delaware | $9.24B | — |
| #42 | Rhode Island | $8.93B | — |
| #43 | Alaska | $8.4B | — |
| #44 | Idaho | $8.21B | — |
| #45 | New Hampshire | $7.12B | — |
| #46 | Montana | $6.44B | — |
| #47 | Vermont | $6.28B | — |
| #48 | North Dakota | $5.63B | — |
| #49 | South Dakota | $4.55B | — |
| #50 | Wyoming | $4.01B | — |
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Enacted appropriations after subtracting interdepartmental grants and transfers to avoid double counting. The adjusted-gross total includes federal, General Fund, School Aid Fund, other state-restricted, local, and private funding.
Shares of the $42.6 billion in taxes reported as general revenue by Michigan's governmental activities. This denominator includes taxes restricted for education and transportation, while excluding grants, service charges, investment income, and business-type activities.
Every department's adjusted-gross appropriation in the official $74.0 billion enacted summary is included exactly once in these service areas. The groups reconcile to the enacted total above.
Audited government-wide activity for Michigan's primary government. Revenue is program revenue plus general and other revenue in the Statement of Activities; these are accrual-accounting results, not the FY2027 adjusted-gross appropriation.
Explore statements about budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt from FactVote’s Michigan candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
Eliminating M.D.O.T. budget and reallocating funds to counties gives local governments the resources and flexibility to repair their own infrastructure. This localized approach ensures quicker, more effective repairs. That’s roughly $97 million to each counties road commission.
Eliminating M.D.O.T. budget and reallocating funds to counties gives local governments the resources and flexibility to repair their own infrastructure. This localized approach ensures quicker, more effective repairs. That’s roughly $97 million to each counties road commission.Anthony Hudson campaign source 2 ↗
You have a right to know how your money is spent. Transparency is not a luxury — it is a requirement of legitimate government. Christine will push for open records, public budget hearings, and plain-language reporting on how taxpayer dollars are used. She will oppose backroom deals and any process d…
You have a right to know how your money is spent. Transparency is not a luxury — it is a requirement of legitimate government. Christine will push for open records, public budget hearings, and plain-language reporting on how taxpayer dollars are used. She will oppose backroom deals and any process designed to limit public scrutiny of government action. Lansing should be an open book, not a closed club.Christine Sloan — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Foreign Policy: We must initiate the return of our soldiers from around the world, including Korea, Japan, Europe, and the entire Middle East. We must cease the war propaganda, threats of a blockade, and plans for attacks on Iran, nor should we re-ignite the cold war with Russia over Ukraine. We mus…
Foreign Policy: We must initiate the return of our soldiers from around the world, including Korea, Japan, Europe, and the entire Middle East. We must cease the war propaganda, threats of a blockade, and plans for attacks on Iran, nor should we re-ignite the cold war with Russia over Ukraine. We must be willing to talk to all countries and offer friendship and trade and travel to all who are willing. We must take off the table the threat of a nuclear first strike against all nations.Privacy: We must protect the privacy and civil liberties of all persons under US jurisdiction. We must repeal or radically change the USA Freedom Act (successor to the Patriot Act), the Military Commissions Act, and the FISA legislation. We must reject the notion and practice of torture, eliminations of habeas corpus, secret tribunals, and secret prisons. We must deny immunity for corporations that spy willingly on the people for the benefit of the government. We must reject the unitary presidency, the illegal use of signing statements, and excessive use of executive ordersThe National Debt: I believe that there should be no increase in the national debt. The burden of debt placed on the next generation is unjust and already threatening our economy and the value of our dollar. We must pay our bills as we go along and not unfairly place this burden on a future generation.The Federal Reserve: I seek a thorough investigation, evaluation and audit of the Federal Reserve System and its cozy relationships with the banking, corporate, and other financial institutions. The arbitrary power to create money and credit out of thin air behind closed doors for the benefit of commercial interests must be ended. There should be no taxpayer bailouts of corporations and no corporate subsidies. Corporations should be aggressively prosecuted for their crimes and frauds.Mike Saliba — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
The National Debt: I believe that there should be no increase in the national debt. The burden of debt placed on the next generation is unjust and already threatening our economy and the value of our dollar. We must pay our bills as we go along and not unfairly place this burden on a future generati…
The National Debt: I believe that there should be no increase in the national debt. The burden of debt placed on the next generation is unjust and already threatening our economy and the value of our dollar. We must pay our bills as we go along and not unfairly place this burden on a future generation.Mike Saliba — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
This section matches specific budgets, government spending, deficits and public debt terms in retained, attributed source text from published Michigan candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Michigan legislators and Michigan’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Michigan’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
33 matching sponsorships or proposals · 20 Michigan incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Michigan House · District 49 · R–MI
3 proposalsJul 29, 2026 · Enacted · Public Act 25 of 2026
Rep. Ann Bollin · Sponsored
The bill addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education.
The official Michigan Legislature history entry dated July 29, 2026 records: assigned PA 25'26 with immediate effect. This is the journal entry date; the governor's approval, filing and effective dates require the complete history and act.
The official record directly addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed adult attainment estimate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: school aid omnibus; fiscal year 2026-2027 appropriations for K-12 school aid, higher education, and community colleges; provide for.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Mar 3, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026
Rep. Ann Bollin · Sponsored
The bill addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated March 3, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026.
The official record directly addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed adult attainment estimate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: school aid omnibus; fiscal year 2027-2028 appropriations for K-12 school aid, higher education, and community colleges; provide for.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Mar 3, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026
Rep. Ann Bollin · Sponsored
The bill addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated March 3, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026.
The official record directly addresses Medicaid, CHIP, health-insurance eligibility, enrollment, continuity, or premium assistance. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's under-65 uninsured rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: People under 65 without health insurance. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: department of health and human services; appropriations for fiscal year 2026-2027 for Medicaid and behavioral health; provide for.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan House · District 110 · R–MI
3 proposalsMar 3, 2026 · bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026
Rep. Gregory Markkanen · Sponsored
The bill addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated March 3, 2026 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026.
The official record directly addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed adult attainment estimate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: higher education; appropriations for fiscal year 2026-2027; provide for.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Jun 17, 2025 · REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Rep. Gregory Markkanen · Sponsored
The bill addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education.
The latest retained Michigan Legislature history entry dated June 17, 2025 records: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS.
The official record directly addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed adult attainment estimate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: higher education; appropriations for fiscal year 2025-2026; provide for.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Jan 23, 2020 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Gregory Markkanen · Sponsored
The bill addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development.
The 2019-2020 Legislature adjourned on December 23, 2020. The retained official history entry dated January 23, 2020 records: bill electronically reproduced 01/22/2020. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
The official record directly addresses wages, income support, employment services, apprenticeships, or workforce development. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's median household income.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: supplemental; support for workforce development system shortfall; restore.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan House · District 9 · D–MI
1 proposalFeb 25, 2021 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Joseph Tate · Sponsored
Appropriations: school aid; executive recommendation; provide for omnibus appropriations for school aid, higher education, and community colleges. Amends secs. 4, 6, 6a, 11, 11a, 11j, 11k, 11m, 11s, 15, 18, 19, 20, 20d, 20f, 21f, 21h, 22a, 22b, 22d, 22m, 22p, 24, 24a, 25f, 25g, 26a, 26b, 26c, 28, 31a, 31d, 31f, 31j, 31m, 31n, 32d, 32p, 35a, 39, 39a, 41, 51a, 51c, 51d, 51f, 53a, 54, 54b, 54d, 56, 61a, 61b, 61d, 62, 65, 67, 74, 81, 94, 94a, 98, 99h, 99s, 101, 104, 104c, 105, 105c, 107, 147, 147a, 147b, 147c, 147e, 152a, 166b, 201, 206, 207a, 207b, 207c, 209, 209a, 222, 226e, 229a, 230, 236, 236b, 236c, 241, 245, 245a, 252, 256, m260, 263, 264, 265, 265a, 265b, 267, 268, 269, 270c, 275h, 276,…
The 2021-2022 Legislature adjourned on December 28, 2022. The retained official history entry dated February 25, 2021 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/24/2021. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
The official record directly addresses postsecondary completion, adult education, tuition support, or career and technical education. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed adult attainment estimate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Adults with at least a high school diploma. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: school aid; executive recommendation; provide for omnibus appropriations for school aid, higher education, and community colleges.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan House · District 74 · D–MI
2 proposalsJun 30, 2021 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Kara Hope · Sponsored
The bill addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention.
The 2021-2022 Legislature adjourned on December 28, 2022. The retained official history entry dated June 30, 2021 records: bill electronically reproduced 06/29/2021. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
The official record directly addresses firearms, ammunition, firearm access, carrying, storage, enforcement, or gun-violence prevention. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's firearm mortality count or rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Firearm deaths. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: supplemental; gun violence prevention program; provide funding.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Feb 5, 2020 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Kara Hope · Sponsored
The bill would increase the pay of elections inspectors; provide for. Creates appropriation act.
The 2019-2020 Legislature adjourned on December 23, 2020. The retained official history entry dated February 5, 2020 records: bill electronically reproduced 02/04/2020. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
The official record directly addresses voter registration, ballots, voting access, or election administration. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's displayed turnout rate.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Registered-voter turnout. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: supplemental; allocation of certain funds to municipal, city, village, or township election clerks to increase the pay of elections inspectors; provide for.Review official supporting evidence ↗
U.S. representative for Michigan, District 9 · R–MI
1 proposalMay 20, 2026 · Introduced
Rep. Lisa C. McClain · Sponsored
The bill addresses rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, homelessness, or housing supply.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development.
The official record directly addresses rental housing, tenant protections, housing assistance, homelessness, or housing supply. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's median gross rent.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Rental assistance demonstration program The language under the heading Rental Assistance Demonstration in the Department of Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 112–55; 125 Stat. 673) is amended— (1) in the second proviso, by striking until September 30, 2029 and inserting for fiscal year 2012 and each fiscal year thereafter; (2) by striking the fourth proviso; (3) in the twentieth proviso, as so designated before the date of enactment of this Act, by striking or other means: and…Review official supporting evidence ↗
Michigan House · District 51 · R–MI
1 proposalMay 2, 2023 · Session ended · final outcome unverified
Rep. Matt Maddock · Sponsored
The bill addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy.
The 2023-2024 Legislature adjourned on January 1, 2025. The retained official history entry dated May 2, 2023 records: bill electronically reproduced 04/27/2023. Its final disposition still requires the complete official history; this older measure is not shown as currently pending.
The official record directly addresses abortion access, abortion-related services, or reproductive-health policy. It does not establish an effect on Michigan's reported induced-abortion count.
Retained Michigan evidence context: Induced abortions reported as occurring in Michigan. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Appropriations: supplemental; alternatives to abortion; provide funding for.Review official supporting evidence ↗
Only current Michigan officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Michigan statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 6, 2026.