Maryland · individual fact

Maryland unemployment rate

State unemployment, employed residents, broader underutilization, and employment growth.

Annual unemployment rate3.2%2024 · #34 of 50 · highest first
Civilian employed residents3,137,9302024 · #18 of 50 · highest first
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer1.5%2025 · 11-month average · #22 of 50 · highest first

Maryland over time

Explore Maryland readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Maryland officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Maryland effect.

Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Maryland change.

Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear

Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.

Annual unemployment rate Maryland · source units
MarylandPublished U.S. benchmark

Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.

Annual unemployment rate2024: 3.2%1.2%4.4%7.5%Maryland, 2015: 5%Maryland, 2016: 4.2%Maryland, 2017: 4.1%Maryland, 2018: 3.8%Maryland, 2019: 3.4%Maryland, 2020: 6.5%Maryland, 2021: 5.2%Maryland, 2022: 3%Maryland, 2023: 2.2%Maryland, 2024: 3.2%201520192024
✦ Major events & context · 17National context · COVID-19 pandemic · 2020-03-11COVID-19 pandemicNational context · CARES Act expands unemployment support · 2020-03-27CARES unemployment aidNational context · First U.S. COVID-19 vaccine authorization · 2020-12-11COVID vaccine authorizationNational context · American Rescue Plan extends pandemic unemployment benefits · 2021-03-11Pandemic benefits extendedNational context · Federal pandemic unemployment programs reach their cutoff · 2021-09-06Pandemic benefits expireNational context · Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine · 2022-02-24Russia invades UkraineNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2022 rate increases · 2022-03-16Fed rate increases beginNational context · Silicon Valley Bank failure and banking stress · 2023-03-10Banking stress / SVBNational context · UAW strikes begin at the three Detroit automakers · 2023-09-15UAW auto strikesNational context · Federal Reserve begins its 2024 rate cuts · 2024-09-18Fed rate cuts beginNational context · Hurricanes Helene and Milton · 2024-09-26Helene & MiltonNational context · Broad U.S. tariff announcement · 2025-04-02U.S. tariff announcementNational context · Federal shutdown interrupts unemployment data · 2025-10-01Federal shutdown / data gapNational context · BLS reports federal payroll decline as deferred resignations take effect · 2025-12-16Federal payroll departuresMaryland · Maryland establishes a workforce-training pilot for new businesses · 2026-05-12Maryland workforce pilotMaryland · Maryland approves child-care scholarship freeze exceptions and a waitlist · 2026-05-26Maryland child-care scholarshipsNational context · Federal Reserve raises rates in September 2026 · 2026-09-16September 2026 rate rise● Maryland Legislature · 1123● U.S. Congress · Maryland delegation · 0No reviewed actions match these filters.◆ Governor · 1022■ Maryland agencies · 72015-12-012026-09-30

28 of 28 reviewed Maryland actions match · 23 date markers shown. 17 major events shown separately.

Maryland · 2024: 3.2% · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4%

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages. LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.

View observations and export data
Maryland Annual unemployment rate · source units
PeriodMarylandRankU.S. benchmark
20243.2%#34 of 504%
20232.2%#47 of 50Not available
20223%#32 of 50Not available
20215.2%#20 of 50Not available
20206.5%#29 of 50Not available
20193.4%#27 of 50Not available
20183.8%#25 of 50Not available
20174.1%#27 of 50Not available
20164.2%#33 of 50Not available
20155%#26 of 50Not available
How major events are selected

The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.

Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.

Maryland · state comparison

Employment and unemployment over time

LAUS annual averages measure state residents. Compare unemployment rates or the number of employed residents.

Maryland · 20243.2%
Maryland rank#34among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark4%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual unemployment rate

Unemployed residents as a percentage of the civilian labor force, using BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics annual averages.

LAUS estimates are revised each year through the program's annual processing cycle. Employment is residence-based civilian employment, not a count of jobs located in the state. Annual averages smooth within-year changes.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maryland
Annual unemployment rate history in Maryland1.6%4.4%7.1%20152024
2024 · Maryland: 3.2% · Rank #34 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 4% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maryland Annual unemployment rate history
PeriodMarylandCompare
20155%
20164.2%
20174.1%
20183.8%
20193.4%
20206.5%
20215.2%
20223%
20232.2%
20243.2%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · 1.8%Higher value · 5.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · 3.2%2024 · Rank #34 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Annual unemployment rate · 2024 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Nevada5.4%—
#2California5.3%—
#3Illinois5%—
#4Kentucky4.8%—
#5Michigan4.7%—
#6New Jersey4.6%—
#7Alaska4.5%—
#7Washington4.5%—
#9Ohio4.4%—
#10Louisiana4.3%—
#10Oregon4.3%—
#12New York4.2%—
#12Rhode Island4.2%—
#14Colorado4.1%—
#14New Mexico4.1%—
#14South Carolina4.1%—
#14Texas4.1%—
#14West Virginia4.1%—
#19Indiana4%—
#19Massachusetts4%—
#21Delaware3.9%—
#22Pennsylvania3.8%—
#23Arizona3.7%—
#23Missouri3.7%—
#23North Carolina3.7%—
#26Idaho3.6%—
#27Arkansas3.5%—
#27Kansas3.5%—
#29Florida3.4%—
#29Georgia3.4%—
#29Tennessee3.4%—
#32Connecticut3.3%—
#32Utah3.3%—
#34Iowa3.2%—
#34Maryland · your comparison3.2%—
#34Mississippi3.2%—
#34Oklahoma3.2%—
#38Minnesota3.1%—
#38Wyoming3.1%—
#40Alabama3%—
#40Maine3%—
#40Montana3%—
#40Wisconsin3%—
#44Virginia2.9%—
#45Hawaii2.8%—
#46Nebraska2.7%—
#47New Hampshire2.6%—
#48North Dakota2.4%—
#49Vermont2.3%—
#50South Dakota1.8%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maryland · state comparison

Behind the unemployment rate

The reviewed 2025 CPS snapshot includes both U-3 and the broader U-6 measure. It is separate from the LAUS annual history.

Maryland · 2025 · 11-month average1.5%
Maryland rank#22among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1.6%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer

Unemployed 15 weeks or longer as a share of the civilian labor force.

2025 CPS averages exclude October because data were not collected during the federal shutdown. Not strictly comparable with other-year averages. These directly surveyed CPS estimates differ from LAUS model-based estimates. All states use the same 11 months here.

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · 0.6%Higher value · 2.4%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · 1.5%2025 · 11-month average · Rank #22 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
U-1 · unemployed 15 weeks or longer · 2025 · 11-month average · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California2.4%—
#2Oregon2.2%—
#3Illinois2.1%—
#3New York2.1%—
#5Connecticut2%—
#5Rhode Island2%—
#5Washington2%—
#8Massachusetts1.9%—
#8Nevada1.9%—
#8New Jersey1.9%—
#11Delaware1.8%—
#11Virginia1.8%—
#13Louisiana1.7%—
#13Michigan1.7%—
#13West Virginia1.7%—
#16Alaska1.6%—
#16Florida1.6%—
#16Mississippi1.6%—
#16New Mexico1.6%—
#16Ohio1.6%—
#16Pennsylvania1.6%—
#22Colorado1.5%—
#22Kentucky1.5%—
#22Maryland · your comparison1.5%—
#22Texas1.5%—
#26Arizona1.4%—
#26Georgia1.4%—
#28Arkansas1.3%—
#28Iowa1.3%—
#28North Carolina1.3%—
#28Oklahoma1.3%—
#28South Carolina1.3%—
#33Kansas1.2%—
#33Minnesota1.2%—
#33New Hampshire1.2%—
#33Wisconsin1.2%—
#37Tennessee1.1%—
#37Utah1.1%—
#39Idaho1%—
#39Indiana1%—
#39Nebraska1%—
#42Alabama0.9%—
#42Maine0.9%—
#42Missouri0.9%—
#42Wyoming0.9%—
#46Hawaii0.7%—
#46Montana0.7%—
#46South Dakota0.7%—
#46Vermont0.7%—
#50North Dakota0.6%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maryland · state comparison

Output and jobs

Annual real output growth and BEA job growth provide economic context. Neither is the unemployment rate.

Maryland · 20250.8%
Maryland rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark2.3%Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Annual real GDP growth

Change in annual real GDP from the prior year.

Annual estimates; the downloaded BEA snapshot is retained with a source hash. Revisions can change historical values and ranks.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maryland
Annual real GDP growth history in Maryland-4.9%1.4%7.7%20152025
2025 · Maryland: 0.8% · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 2.3% · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maryland Annual real GDP growth history
PeriodMarylandCompare
20152.3%
20163.5%
20172%
20180.7%
20190%
2020-3.4%
20215%
20221.7%
20231.1%
20243.4%
20250.8%

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · -0.4%Higher value · 5.1%Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · 0.8%2025 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Annual real GDP growth · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1Delaware5.1%—
#2Alaska4.7%—
#3California3.5%—
#4South Carolina3.3%—
#5Washington3.2%—
#6Idaho3.1%—
#7Kentucky3%—
#8Georgia2.9%—
#9Texas2.8%—
#10West Virginia2.8%—
#11Florida2.8%—
#12Rhode Island2.8%—
#13Utah2.7%—
#14Illinois2.6%—
#15New York2.5%—
#16Connecticut2.5%—
#17Ohio2.4%—
#18Virginia2.3%—
#19Oklahoma2.2%—
#20Michigan2.2%—
#21Tennessee2.1%—
#22New Jersey2%—
#23Nevada2%—
#24Montana2%—
#25Alabama2%—
#26Vermont1.9%—
#27Colorado1.9%—
#28Indiana1.9%—
#29Pennsylvania1.8%—
#30North Carolina1.8%—
#31New Mexico1.8%—
#32South Dakota1.8%—
#33New Hampshire1.7%—
#34Louisiana1.5%—
#35Hawaii1.5%—
#36Arizona1.5%—
#37Maine1.4%—
#38Oregon1.4%—
#39Massachusetts1.3%—
#40Mississippi1.3%—
#41Nebraska1.3%—
#42Missouri1.2%—
#43Kansas1%—
#44Arkansas0.9%—
#45Wisconsin0.8%—
#46Maryland · your comparison0.8%—
#47Minnesota0.7%—
#48North Dakota0.5%—
#49Wyoming0.1%—
#50Iowa-0.4%—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

Maryland · state comparison

Job openings, hires, layoffs, and worker groups

A state unemployment rate does not capture all unused labor or job-market turnover.

Maryland · December 2025127,000
Maryland rank#17among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark6,550,000Same measure and period when published

#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.

Openings · number

Number of jobs or monthly employment flows; published thousands converted to individual units.

Seasonally adjusted state JOLTS estimates, July–December 2025 as printed in the captured table. Recent estimates are preliminary and revisions can change ranks. Openings are a month-end stock; hires, quits, and layoffs are monthly flows, not distinct workers.

Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.

Maryland
Openings · number history in Maryland-935,2003,646,0008,227,200July 2025December 2025
December 2025 · Maryland: 127,000 · Rank #17 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: 6,550,000 · Selected for state comparison
View history and select a period
Maryland Openings · number history
PeriodMarylandCompare
July 2025132,000
August 2025122,000
September 2025132,000
October 2025144,000
November 2025133,000
December 2025127,000

Compare states on the graph

Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.

Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.

Lower value · 11,000Higher value · 674,000Striped: unavailable

Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.

Maryland · 127,000December 2025 · Rank #17 of 50, highest firstSelected state

50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.

Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Openings · number · December 2025 · highest value ranked #1
RankStateValueComparison notes
#1California674,000—
#2Texas608,000—
#3New York431,000—
#4Florida404,000—
#5Ohio287,000—
#6Georgia279,000—
#7Pennsylvania235,000—
#8Michigan221,000—
#9Virginia213,000—
#10North Carolina212,000—
#11Illinois211,000—
#12New Jersey172,000—
#13Tennessee143,000—
#14Minnesota135,000—
#15Massachusetts129,000—
#16Missouri128,000—
#17Maryland · your comparison127,000—
#18Indiana123,000—
#19Arizona121,000—
#20Wisconsin115,000—
#21Washington110,000—
#22South Carolina103,000—
#23Louisiana101,000—
#23Oklahoma101,000—
#25Colorado100,000—
#26Kentucky92,000—
#27Alabama91,000—
#28Oregon72,000—
#29Connecticut67,000—
#30Utah64,000—
#31Kansas61,000—
#32Arkansas60,000—
#33Mississippi59,000—
#34Iowa57,000—
#35Nevada52,000—
#36West Virginia42,000—
#37Nebraska38,000—
#38Idaho34,000—
#39New Mexico32,000—
#40Maine28,000—
#41Delaware23,000—
#42Montana22,000—
#42New Hampshire22,000—
#42Rhode Island22,000—
#45South Dakota20,000—
#46Hawaii19,000—
#47North Dakota18,000—
#48Alaska16,000—
#49Vermont11,000—
#49Wyoming11,000—

All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.

What candidates are saying

Explore statements about unemployment, jobs and workforce issues from FactVote’s Maryland candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.

8 statements from 6 candidates

2026 Maryland Governor / Lt. Governor — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Wes Moore

1 statement

Democratic · Governor / Lt. Governor · MD

Jobs & workforce context

Advance clean-energy initiatives that lower costs, improve reliability, reduce fossil-fuel dependence, and create jobs.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Clean Energy

Candidate campaign source

Advance clean-energy initiatives that lower costs, improve reliability, reduce fossil-fuel dependence, and create jobs.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 16, 2026

Wes Moore — Part 89 verified source ↗

2026 Maryland U.S. House — District 1 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement

Dan Schwartz

1 statement

Democratic · U.S. House District 1 · MD

Jobs & workforce context

Support our workforce by investing in community colleges and trade schools.

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

Support our workforce by investing in community colleges and trade schools.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Dan Schwartz — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗

2026 Maryland U.S. House — District 2 — General Election

1 candidate with matching statements · 3 statements

Democratic · U.S. House District 2 · MD

Unemployment mention

Johnny O introduced first-of-its-kind legislation to create a national housing loss rate—similar to the unemployment rate—so policymakers can finally track, understand, and confront this crisis. He’s also leading efforts to convert vacant and underused buildings into affordable homes, and he support…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Housing affordability

Candidate campaign source

Johnny O introduced first-of-its-kind legislation to create a national housing loss rate—similar to the unemployment rate—so policymakers can finally track, understand, and confront this crisis. He’s also leading efforts to convert vacant and underused buildings into affordable homes, and he supports common-sense steps like tax incentives for first-time homebuyers, expanded access to small-dollar mortgages, and reducing tariffs on construction materials.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Johnny Olszewski Jr. — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
View 2 more statements from Johnny Olszewski Jr.
Jobs & workforce context

Johnny O knows that climate change is real and he is insisting on immediate, bold action to address it. In Congress, he is pushing for aggressive, science-driven policies that will create jobs and help restore our environment. He strongly rejects the Trump Administration’s efforts to dismantle landm…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Energy, technology, and environment

Candidate campaign source

Johnny O knows that climate change is real and he is insisting on immediate, bold action to address it. In Congress, he is pushing for aggressive, science-driven policies that will create jobs and help restore our environment. He strongly rejects the Trump Administration’s efforts to dismantle landmark protections that ensure Americans have clean air and water — and to slash funding for vital environmental programs that safeguard cherished resources like the Chesapeake Bay. Instead, Johnny O backs strategic, large-scale investments in renewable energy: deploying solar, wind and other clean-energy technologies not only to dramatically cut carbon emissions, but also to create thousands of good-paying, sustainable jobs — boosting communities while protecting the planet.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Johnny Olszewski Jr. — candidate-owned primary source 2 ↗
Jobs & workforce context

First elected to Congress in 2024, Johnny O hit the ground running. He quickly secured a competitive spot on the influential Democratic Steering and Policy Committee and serves on the House’s Small Business and Foreign Affairs Committees. In Washington, he is focused on affordability, expanding work…

Read exact statement & source

Source topic or question: Education, child care, and workforce training

Candidate campaign source

First elected to Congress in 2024, Johnny O hit the ground running. He quickly secured a competitive spot on the influential Democratic Steering and Policy Committee and serves on the House’s Small Business and Foreign Affairs Committees. In Washington, he is focused on affordability, expanding workforce and education pathways, increasing access to housing, and defending American democracy at home and abroad. And he’s earned a reputation as a skilled problem solver for constituents back home in the district.

Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026

Johnny Olszewski Jr. — candidate-owned primary source 1 ↗
Race groups · Page 1 of 2
How statements are selected

This section matches specific unemployment, jobs and workforce issues terms in retained, attributed source text from published Maryland candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.

Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.

Maryland incumbents

What incumbents are proposing

Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Maryland legislators and Maryland’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Maryland’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.

11 matching sponsorships or proposals · 8 Maryland incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.

Comptroller Brooke Lierman

Comptroller of Maryland · D–MD

1 proposal
View proposals from Comptroller Brooke Lierman
Maryland Legislature · HB 1045

Land Use - Comprehensive Plans - Housing Element

May 25, 2019 · Enacted without signature

Comptroller Brooke Lierman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring the planning commissions for certain local jurisdictions to include a housing element in the comprehensive plan for their respective jurisdictions; providing that the contents of the housing element in certain comprehensive plans include goals, objectives, policies, plans, and standards and address the need for affordable housing within a county, including workforce housing and low-income housing; and applying the Act prospectively.

2019-05-25: Enacted under Article II, Section 17(c) of the Maryland Constitution - Chapter 713. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.

Why this record is included

Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring the planning commissions for certain local jurisdictions to include a housing element in the comprehensive plan for their respective jurisdictions; providing that the contents of the housing element in certain comprehensive plans include goals, objectives, policies, plans, and standards and address the need for affordable housing within a county, including workforce housing and low-income housing; and applying the Act prospectively.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Del. Jessica Feldmark

Maryland House of Delegates, District 12A · D–MD

1 proposal
View proposals from Del. Jessica Feldmark
Maryland Legislature · HB 336

Civilian Federal Employees – Unemployment Insurance Benefits and Federal Government Shutdown Employee Assistance Loan Fund (Federal Shutdown Paycheck Protection Act)

Mar 26, 2019 · Enacted

Del. Jessica Feldmark · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Specifying that an individual who is a civilian employee of the federal government is eligible to receive unemployment benefits under certain circumstances; altering the purpose of the Catastrophic Event Account to enable the State to respond to federal civilian employee financial hardship from a full or partial federal government shutdown due to a lapse in federal appropriations; establishing a certain loan fund to provide loans to civilian employees of the federal government under certain circumstances; etc.

2019-03-26: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 1. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Specifying that an individual who is a civilian employee of the federal government is eligible to receive unemployment benefits under certain circumstances; altering the purpose of the Catastrophic Event Account to enable the State to respond to federal civilian employee financial hardship from a full or partial federal government shutdown due to a lapse in federal appropriations; establishing a certain loan fund to provide loans to civilian employees of the federal government under certain circumstances; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Del. Julie Palakovich Carr

Maryland House of Delegates, District 17 · D–MD

2 proposals
View proposals from Del. Julie Palakovich Carr
Maryland Legislature · HB 261

Unemployment Insurance - Benefits - Election Judges

May 9, 2024 · Enacted

Del. Julie Palakovich Carr · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prohibiting a payment to an individual as compensation received for serving as an election judge for a local board of elections in the State from being included when computing the wages required to be subtracted from an eligible claimant's weekly benefit amount; and prohibiting an individual from being denied unemployment benefits for failure to meet certain requirements due to service as an election judge in the State.

2024-05-09: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 617. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Prohibiting a payment to an individual as compensation received for serving as an election judge for a local board of elections in the State from being included when computing the wages required to be subtracted from an eligible claimant's weekly benefit amount; and prohibiting an individual from being denied unemployment benefits for failure to meet certain requirements due to service as an election judge in the State.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · HB 253

Unemployment Insurance – Federal Extended Benefits for Long–Term Unemployment

May 29, 2022 · Enacted without signature

Del. Julie Palakovich Carr · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Altering the period that constitutes an extended benefit period and when a State "on" indicator exists; specifying the total amount of certain extended unemployment benefits that are payable to an eligible individual; authorizing the Secretary of Labor, if authorized by federal law, to suspend the payment of certain extended unemployment benefits; and establishing that federal unemployment law provisions and definitions related to extended benefits apply to a certain extent.

2022-05-29: Enacted under Article II, Section 17(c) of the Maryland Constitution - Chapter 652. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Altering the period that constitutes an extended benefit period and when a State "on" indicator exists; specifying the total amount of certain extended unemployment benefits that are payable to an eligible individual; authorizing the Secretary of Labor, if authorized by federal law, to suspend the payment of certain extended unemployment benefits; and establishing that federal unemployment law provisions and definitions related to extended benefits apply to a certain extent.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Brian J. Feldman

Maryland Senate, District 15 · D–MD

2 proposals
View proposals from Sen. Brian J. Feldman
Maryland Legislature · SB 516

Clean Energy Jobs

May 25, 2019 · Enacted without signature

Sen. Brian J. Feldman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Requiring the Small, Minority, and Women-Owned Businesses Account to receive certain money from the Strategic Energy Investment Fund; establishing certain criteria for qualified offshore wind projects applied for on or after July 1, 2017, termed Round 2 offshore wind projects; establishing the Clean Energy Workforce Account to provide grants for apprenticeships and training to establish career paths in sectors of the clean energy industry; requiring the Power Plant Research Program to conduct additional studies; etc.

2019-05-25: Enacted under Article II, Section 17(c) of the Maryland Constitution - Chapter 757. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.

Why this record is included

Nuclear share is nuclear generation divided by all in-state generation. Nuclear development or other in-state generation resources concern this mix; procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from an operating plant or measured output. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Requiring the Small, Minority, and Women-Owned Businesses Account to receive certain money from the Strategic Energy Investment Fund; establishing certain criteria for qualified offshore wind projects applied for on or after July 1, 2017, termed Round 2 offshore wind projects; establishing the Clean Energy Workforce Account to provide grants for apprenticeships and training to establish career paths in sectors of the clean energy industry; requiring the Power Plant Research Program to conduct additional studies; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
Maryland Legislature · SB 391

Civilian Federal Employees – Unemployment Insurance Benefits and Federal Government Shutdown Employee Assistance Loan Fund (Federal Shutdown Paycheck Protection Act)

Mar 26, 2019 · Enacted

Sen. Brian J. Feldman · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Specifying that a certain individual who is a civilian employee of the federal government is eligible to receive unemployment benefits under certain circumstances; altering the purpose of the Catastrophic Event Account to enable the State to respond to federal civilian employee financial hardship from a full or partial federal government shutdown due to a lapse in federal appropriations; establishing a certain loan fund to provide loans to civilian employees of the federal government under certain circumstances; etc.

2019-03-26: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 2. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Specifying that a certain individual who is a civilian employee of the federal government is eligible to receive unemployment benefits under certain circumstances; altering the purpose of the Catastrophic Event Account to enable the State to respond to federal civilian employee financial hardship from a full or partial federal government shutdown due to a lapse in federal appropriations; establishing a certain loan fund to provide loans to civilian employees of the federal government under certain circumstances; etc.
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Bryan W. Simonaire

Maryland Senate, District 31 · R–MD

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Bryan W. Simonaire
Maryland Legislature · SB 215

Veterans and Uniformed Services - Maryland Veterans Trust Fund and Application of Laws

May 12, 2026 · Enacted

Sen. Bryan W. Simonaire · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Extends the expedited tenant-holding-over repossession process to qualifying active members of the Public Health Service and NOAA, or their spouses, when the landlord meets the relocation, intended occupancy and documentation requirements.

2026-05-12: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 494. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.

Why this record is included

This provision expands qualifying landlords’ access to an expedited repossession process. It concerns tenancy and possession, not a new rent subsidy or tenant protection. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

SB 215 Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2026 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Third Reader Senate Bill 215 (Senator Simonaire) Education, Energy, and the Environment and Judicial Proceedings Government, Labor, and Elections and Judiciary Veterans and Uniformed Services - Maryland Veterans Trust Fund and Application of Laws This bill generally extends applicability of certain provisions related to local government personnel, trout stamps, and landlord remedies (under tenant holding over actions) to definitively include all members of the uniformed services. In addition to other clarifying and conforming changes, the bill also relocates the existing definition of a “military protection order” to the State Government Article. Fiscal Summary State Effect: Special fund revenues may decrease minimally (likely by less than $5,000 annually) due to additional individuals qualifying for an exemption from trout stamps, as discussed below. The bill is otherwise not anticipated to materially impact State finances or operations. Local Effect: None. Small Business Effect: None. Analysis Bill Summary/Current Law: The bill alters several provisions of State law that generally reference military service. In some instances, the bill’s changes are clarifying or conforming changes only; in other instances, provisions are expanded to apply more broadly. SB 215/ Page 2 Trout Stamps: For example, any person age 16 or older must generally secure an angler’s license to fish in the nontidal waters of the State, as specified in statute. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) must adopt regulations to establish fishing areas where a trout stamp is required in addition to an angler’s license. However, certain individuals are exempt from requiring a trout stamp, including any resident serving in the armed forces of the United States while on leave in the State, during the resident’s leave period, if, while angling, the resident possesses a copy of the resident’s official leave order. The bill repeals the reference to armed forces and replaces it with uniformed services , thereby extending applicability to members of the Public Health Service (PHS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Expedited Process in Tenant Holding Over Actions: Similarly, certain provisions in the Real Property Article establish specific requirements in tenant holding over actions if the landlord or the landlord’s spouse (1) is on active duty with the United States military; (2) has relocated to the State as a direct result of being on active duty; (3) intends to occupy the property that is the subject of the complaint following the entry of the judgment; and (4) submits supporting documentation. In applicable actions, the District Court must order in the summons for the tenant (or assignee or subtenant) to appear before the court no later than 45 days after the landlord makes a complaint to repossess the property. If the sheriff does not serve the summons within 10 days after issuance, the summons may be served by a private process server. The bill generally repeals references to military , instead substituting active service member ; accordingly, those in active service of PHS and NOAA are definitively included. Under the applicable definition, an active service member is an individual who is an active-duty member of the uniformed services or serving in a reserve component of the uniformed services on active-duty orders. Eligibility for Credit Under Selection Test – Local Governments: If a county or municipality uses a selection test for the hiring or appointment of employees, the county or municipality may adopt a local law that allows for the application of a credit of 10 points, or its equivalent, on a selection test for an eligible spouse, an eligible veteran, the spouse of an eligible veteran who has a service-connected disability, or the surviving spouse of a deceased eligible veteran. However, an otherwise eligible veteran who is convicted of a crime after being discharged from or completing military service is ineligible for a credit. The bill replaces the reference to military with uniformed services . Military Protection Order: A “military protection order” means a protection order issued in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 1567 by a commanding officer against a person in the officer’s command in (1) any branch of the uniformed services; (2) the Maryland National Guard; or (3) the national guard of any other state. (The definition is unchanged under the bill.) SB 215/ Page 3 Other Provisions: In 2025, Maryland enacted several pieces of legislation establishing uniform definitions of various military‐related terms and expanding certain benefits more broadly to additional individuals based on military service. The bill also alters additional provisions, which generally conform and clarify existing provisions to the changes made in 2025. State Revenues: According to DNR, approximately 2,200 additional State residents may qualify for a trout stamp exemption under the bill. Based on an assumption that approximately 10% of those individuals may acquire an angler’s license and fish for trout, special fund revenues may decrease from trout stamps by up to $4,400 on an annual basis. Additional Information Recent Prior Introductions: Similar legislation has not been introduced within the last three years. Designated Cross File: None. Information Source(s): Maryland Municipal League; Judiciary (Administrative Office of the Courts); Department of Natural Resources; Maryland Department of Transportation; Department of Veterans and Military Families; Military Department; Department of Legislative Services Fiscal Note History: First Reader - February 12, 2026 Third Reader - March 13, 2026 jg/jkb Analysis by: Amanda L. Douglas Direct Inquiries to: (410) 946-5510 (301) 970-5510
Review official supporting evidence ↗

Sen. Cheryl C. Kagan

Maryland Senate, District 17 · D–MD

1 proposal
View proposals from Sen. Cheryl C. Kagan
Maryland Legislature · SB 460

Unemployment Insurance - Benefits - Election Judges

Mar 19, 2024 · Did not pass

Sen. Cheryl C. Kagan · Sponsored

FactVote reviewed summary

Prohibiting a payment to an individual as compensation received for serving as an election judge for a local board of elections in the State from being included when computing the wages required to be subtracted from an eligible claimant's weekly benefit amount; and prohibiting an individual from being denied unemployment benefits for failure to meet certain requirements due to service as an election judge in the State.

The measure did not pass in its completed 2024RS session. Final recorded action: 2024-03-19, Referred Economic Matters Ways and Means.

Why this record is included

Wages and cash benefits can be components of household money income. Census income is measured before taxes, so tax relief alone is not an increase in this statistic; the provision does not determine the statewide median. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.

Retained Maryland evidence context: Median household income. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.

Prohibiting a payment to an individual as compensation received for serving as an election judge for a local board of elections in the State from being included when computing the wages required to be subtracted from an eligible claimant's weekly benefit amount; and prohibiting an individual from being denied unemployment benefits for failure to meet certain requirements due to service as an election judge in the State.
Review official supporting evidence ↗
What sponsorship and proposal counts tell us

Only current Maryland officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.

Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Maryland statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.