Moved to intervene against a federal pause on reviews of onshore wind projects, seeking resumption of the review process.
Jul 16, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown · Moved to intervene
FactVote reviewed summary
Moved to intervene against a federal pause on reviews of onshore wind projects, seeking resumption of the review process. The link concerns potential generation development, not existing nuclear output.
Reported in an official release on 2026-07-16. Moved to intervene. This is the reporting date; a filing or order may precede it. Litigation, comments, and guidance do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Nuclear share is nuclear generation divided by all in-state generation. Nuclear development or other in-state generation resources concern this mix; procurement targets and authorizations are distinct from an operating plant or measured output. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Nuclear share of in-state electricity generation. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contacts[email protected]410-576-7009BALTIMORE, MD – Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today joined a coalition of 18 other attorneys general in moving to intervene in a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and Secretary Pete Hegseth for unlawfully freezing routine reviews of land-based wind energy projects across the country.Federal law requires DoD to review proposed wind projects for potential national security concerns and work with developers to address any issues. In August 2025, DoD stopped moving projects through this process, blocking wind energy development nationwide. Attorney General Brown and the coalition are asking the court to set aside DoD's unlawful freeze and order the agency to resume the review process required by federal law.“DoD's unlawful freeze is blocking clean-energy projects that could lower costs for Maryland families, create jobs, and strengthen our energy future," said Attorney General Brown. “We're intervening to ensure the federal government follows the law and allows these projects to move forward."Under federal law, land-based wind project developers must submit any proposed projects with wind turbines over 200 feet tall to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for review. The FAA then refers these projects to DoD to assess whether they could affect military operations, radar systems, flight paths, or national security. For more than a decade, DoD engaged in a predictable review process and worked with developers to mitigate potential concerns. Mitigation measures often included changes to turbine placement or height, radar upgrades, or agreements to pause generation under certain circumstances.In August 2025, DoD abruptly stopped following this process. Officials ceased countersigning mitigation agreements, stopped sending completed agreements to developers for signature, and delayed or halted communications with developers about mitigation. As a result, wind projects across the country have been frozen at various stages of the review process, including those that had already completed mitigation negotiations and were awaiting only final DoD approval.Attorney GeneralReview official supporting evidence ↗