Home values, gross rent, homeownership, housing cost burdens, and the pressure from prices and incomes.
Median owner-occupied home value$419.9K2020–2024 · #11 of 50 · highest first
Median gross rent$1.71K2020–2024 · #7 of 50 · highest first
Homeownership rate67.6%2020–2024 · #24 of 50 · highest first
Maryland over time
Explore Maryland readings, major events and reviewed actions on the same date scale. Maryland officeholders appear in separate lanes. National event evidence describes national context; it does not measure a Maryland effect.
Major events & context · A curated selection, including uncertain effects. Milestone dates do not establish that an event caused a Maryland change.
Enacted / issuedDid not proceedPending / in progressStatus unclear
Colors show the latest recorded status. Passing one chamber is not enactment. A number groups actions with the same date, body and status.
Home-price growth since 2016 Maryland · source units
MarylandPublished U.S. benchmark
Move across the chart to inspect the nearest observation. Click or tap to keep a reading selected, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys. Hover over or focus a marker to explore; click or tap to pin. Press Escape to clear.
298 of 298 reviewed Maryland actions match · 156 date markers shown. 28 major events shown separately.
Maryland · 2025: +59.4% · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · U.S. benchmark: Not available
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016. This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income. Annual observations use December 31; monthly observations use the first of the month. Lines connect consecutive readings and do not supply values between them. Missing observations break the lines.
View observations and export data
Maryland Home-price growth since 2016 · source units
The timeline combines the corresponding national fact’s reviewed event catalog, labeled National context, with individually reviewed state milestones. State events use primary sources and distinguish signing, effective and filing dates. Each milestone keeps its source-check date, geographical limits and evidence limits. This curated selection is not a complete history.
Date ranges affect events and actions. Action type, status and official-name search affect government records only. Events remain separate from action counts. An event after the latest observation extends context without creating a new reading.
Maryland · state comparison
Home values, rent, and homeownership
Census values are estimates for occupied housing, rather than current listing or sale prices.
Maryland · 2020–2024$419,900
Maryland rank#11among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark$332,700Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Median owner-occupied home value
Median reported value of owner-occupied housing.
2024 dollars; a higher value can benefit owners and make buying harder.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.
Lower value · $162.6KHigher value · $839.1KStriped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maryland · $419,9002020–2024 · Rank #11 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Median owner-occupied home value · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Hawaii
$839,100
—
#2
California
$734,700
—
#3
Washington
$564,600
—
#4
Massachusetts
$562,100
—
#5
Colorado
$539,400
—
#6
Utah
$489,400
—
#7
Oregon
$477,600
—
#8
New Jersey
$454,400
—
#9
Nevada
$435,400
—
#10
New York
$423,800
—
#11
Maryland · your comparison
$419,900
—
#12
Idaho
$418,600
—
#13
Rhode Island
$404,200
—
#14
New Hampshire
$402,500
—
#15
Arizona
$394,500
—
#16
Virginia
$383,700
—
#17
Montana
$375,800
—
#18
Connecticut
$366,900
—
#19
Florida
$359,000
—
#20
Alaska
$352,900
—
#21
Delaware
$352,000
—
#22
Minnesota
$329,300
—
#23
Vermont
$316,600
—
#24
Wyoming
$309,700
—
#25
Georgia
$303,300
—
#26
Maine
$296,600
—
#27
North Carolina
$288,900
—
#28
Tennessee
$286,700
—
#29
Texas
$283,800
—
#30
Wisconsin
$266,500
—
#31
Illinois
$263,300
—
#32
South Carolina
$259,000
—
#33
South Dakota
$257,400
—
#34
Pennsylvania
$254,500
—
#35
North Dakota
$249,900
—
#36
New Mexico
$248,100
—
#37
Nebraska
$238,600
—
#38
Michigan
$231,600
—
#39
Missouri
$230,300
—
#40
Indiana
$218,200
—
#41
Kansas
$217,200
—
#42
Louisiana
$216,500
—
#43
Ohio
$214,800
—
#44
Alabama
$209,900
—
#45
Iowa
$208,000
—
#46
Kentucky
$205,600
—
#47
Oklahoma
$199,800
—
#48
Arkansas
$188,000
—
#49
Mississippi
$169,800
—
#50
West Virginia
$162,600
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Median monthly gross rent for renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent, including contract rent plus estimated average utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.
This source snapshot keeps its own definition and period. A rank shown elsewhere applies only to that comparison’s measure and period.
Method and limitations
U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts, sourced from the American Community Survey 2020–2024 five-year estimate and expressed in 2024 dollars.
This is a multi-year statewide estimate, not a current asking-rent measure.
The median obscures differences by location, unit size, housing quality, and renter circumstances.
Compare moderate-or-severe and severe housing cost burdens for three distinct housing groups.
Maryland · 2020–202451.5%
Maryland rank#15among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark51.1%Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Renters · spending at least 30% of income
Housing costs as a share of household income, excluding households for which a ratio cannot be computed.
Renters and owners have separate denominators. Ratios use the Census computed-income universe.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.
Lower value · 38.9%Higher value · 60.1%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maryland · 51.5%2020–2024 · Rank #15 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Renters · spending at least 30% of income · 2020–2024 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Florida
60.1%
—
#2
Hawaii
56.7%
—
#3
Nevada
55.9%
—
#4
California
55.3%
—
#5
Louisiana
54.8%
—
#6
Colorado
52.9%
—
#7
Connecticut
52.6%
—
#8
Oregon
52.5%
—
#9
Georgia
52.4%
—
#10
South Carolina
52.1%
—
#11
New York
52.1%
—
#12
Massachusetts
51.8%
—
#13
Texas
51.7%
—
#14
New Jersey
51.6%
—
#15
Maryland · your comparison
51.5%
—
#16
Arizona
51.4%
—
#17
Mississippi
51.3%
—
#18
Michigan
50.4%
—
#19
New Mexico
50.2%
—
#20
Washington
49.9%
—
#21
Delaware
49.6%
—
#22
North Carolina
48.9%
—
#23
West Virginia
48.9%
—
#24
Tennessee
48.8%
—
#25
Alabama
48.8%
—
#26
Virginia
48.5%
—
#27
Maine
48.4%
—
#28
Vermont
48.4%
—
#29
New Hampshire
48.2%
—
#30
Pennsylvania
48.2%
—
#31
Minnesota
48.1%
—
#32
Indiana
48.1%
—
#33
Rhode Island
48%
—
#34
Illinois
47.9%
—
#35
Utah
47.2%
—
#36
Idaho
46.9%
—
#37
Oklahoma
46.3%
—
#38
Ohio
45.9%
—
#39
Missouri
45.6%
—
#40
Kentucky
45.4%
—
#41
Nebraska
45.1%
—
#42
Arkansas
44.8%
—
#43
Montana
44.8%
—
#44
Alaska
44.6%
—
#45
Iowa
43.9%
—
#46
Wisconsin
43.7%
—
#47
Kansas
43.5%
—
#48
Wyoming
43.1%
—
#49
South Dakota
39.8%
—
#50
North Dakota
38.9%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Both series start at 100 in 2016. The gap describes price pressure; it is not a mortgage payment or a price-to-income ratio.
Maryland · 2025+59.4%
Maryland rank#46among all 50 states
U.S. benchmarkNot availableSame measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Home-price growth since 2016
FactVote averages the four quarterly, not-seasonally-adjusted FHFA all-transactions HPI observations for each year. It compares that series with BEA annual per-capita personal income distributed by FRED, then rebases both to 100 in 2016.
This is a pressure indicator, not a home-price-to-income ratio and not a measure of monthly mortgage affordability. Both series are nominal; neither is adjusted for inflation. Per-capita personal income includes earnings, property income, and transfers and is not median household income.
Hover to inspect. Click or tap to compare that period with every state. Focus the graph and use arrow keys, Home or End to select a period. Press Escape to return to the latest period.
Maryland
2025 · Maryland: +59.4% · Rank #46 of 50, highest first · Selected for state comparisonView history and select a period
Maryland Home-price growth since 2016 history
Period
Maryland
Compare
2016
+0%
2017
+2.8%
2018
+5.3%
2019
+8.7%
2020
+13.6%
2021
+26.9%
2022
+42.6%
2023
+50.7%
2024
+59%
2025
+59.4%
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.
Lower value · +38.2%Higher value · +141.7%Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maryland · +59.4%2025 · Rank #46 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at the index base (0% growth); #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Home-price growth since 2016 · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Idaho
+141.7%
—
#2
Florida
+114.5%
—
#3
Maine
+113.7%
—
#4
Utah
+113.6%
—
#5
Tennessee
+112.4%
—
#6
Arizona
+112.3%
—
#7
New Hampshire
+110.1%
—
#8
Rhode Island
+108%
—
#9
Georgia
+107.6%
—
#10
North Carolina
+107.1%
—
#11
Montana
+106.7%
—
#12
Nevada
+106.1%
—
#13
South Carolina
+105.5%
—
#14
Washington
+100.2%
—
#15
Indiana
+94.5%
—
#16
Wisconsin
+94%
—
#17
Michigan
+93.7%
—
#18
Ohio
+93.3%
—
#19
Vermont
+92.6%
—
#20
New Jersey
+88.9%
—
#21
Missouri
+86.9%
—
#22
New York
+85.9%
—
#23
Nebraska
+84.6%
—
#24
Massachusetts
+84.3%
—
#24
South Dakota
+84.3%
—
#26
Texas
+83.3%
—
#27
Kentucky
+83.2%
—
#28
Colorado
+83.1%
—
#29
Kansas
+82.5%
—
#30
New Mexico
+82.3%
—
#31
Alabama
+81.3%
—
#32
Arkansas
+80.8%
—
#33
Connecticut
+79.8%
—
#34
Pennsylvania
+78.4%
—
#35
Virginia
+76.5%
—
#36
Delaware
+75.4%
—
#37
Oregon
+74.7%
—
#38
California
+72.7%
—
#39
Oklahoma
+71.9%
—
#40
Minnesota
+70%
—
#41
Wyoming
+69.3%
—
#42
Illinois
+65.3%
—
#43
Iowa
+64.2%
—
#44
Mississippi
+63.9%
—
#45
Hawaii
+63%
—
#46
Maryland · your comparison
+59.4%
—
#47
West Virginia
+58.6%
—
#48
Alaska
+51.9%
—
#49
North Dakota
+45.9%
—
#50
Louisiana
+38.2%
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
State building activity, vacant units, mortgage performance, and borrowing rates are different measures.
Maryland · 202513,358
Maryland rank#32among all 50 states
U.S. benchmark1,431,616Same measure and period when published
#1 is the highest value. Ties share a rank and leave gaps. D.C. and territories are excluded. Rank describes the measured value; it is not an overall score of the state.
Total housing units authorized
New privately owned housing units authorized by building permits; final annual, not seasonally adjusted.
A permit is authorization, not a start or completed home. Absolute counts reflect the size of a state. Units in permit-issuing places; excludes public housing.
Compare states on the graph
Hover or focus a bar to inspect its value and rank. Use the up and down arrows, Home or End to explore states. Click, tap or press Enter to keep a state selected. Maryland stays highlighted. Values use the same measure and period.
Explore the map: hover or focus a state to inspect it, then click or tap to select it. Arrow keys move between states alphabetically. Maryland has a dark outline.
Lower value · 848Higher value · 210,217Striped: unavailable
Color shows this measure’s value, not an overall state score. Select a state on the map, graph or dropdown to read its value, rank and comparison limits below.
Maryland · 13,3582025 · Rank #32 of 50, highest firstSelected state
50 states shown · scroll to explore every state. Missing values have no bar and are excluded from ranks. Bars start at zero; #1 means the highest value.
Compare Maryland with every state · 50 ranked
Total housing units authorized · 2025 · highest value ranked #1
Rank
State
Value
Comparison notes
#1
Texas
210,217
—
#2
Florida
178,297
—
#3
California
103,856
—
#4
North Carolina
86,167
—
#5
Georgia
61,196
—
#6
Arizona
51,532
—
#7
South Carolina
45,862
—
#8
Tennessee
43,374
—
#9
New York
38,667
—
#10
Washington
34,913
—
#11
Colorado
33,754
—
#12
Ohio
33,640
—
#13
Virginia
33,094
—
#14
Indiana
29,076
—
#15
New Jersey
27,661
—
#16
Utah
26,775
—
#17
Pennsylvania
25,709
—
#18
Wisconsin
25,569
—
#19
Michigan
23,075
—
#20
Minnesota
20,947
—
#21
Alabama
19,061
—
#22
Illinois
18,551
—
#23
Nevada
18,540
—
#24
Idaho
17,944
—
#25
Missouri
17,474
—
#26
Oklahoma
15,513
—
#27
Arkansas
15,492
—
#28
Kentucky
14,940
—
#29
Oregon
14,839
—
#30
Louisiana
14,203
—
#31
Iowa
13,664
—
#32
Maryland · your comparison
13,358
—
#33
Massachusetts
12,477
—
#34
Nebraska
10,596
—
#35
Kansas
10,299
—
#36
Mississippi
8,405
—
#37
New Mexico
7,747
—
#38
Connecticut
7,273
—
#39
Maine
6,979
—
#40
Delaware
6,468
—
#41
South Dakota
5,305
—
#42
Montana
5,258
—
#43
New Hampshire
5,030
—
#44
West Virginia
3,962
—
#45
Hawaii
3,708
—
#46
North Dakota
2,440
—
#47
Vermont
2,294
—
#48
Wyoming
2,238
—
#49
Rhode Island
1,738
—
#50
Alaska
848
—
All 50 states are listed, including states without a comparable observation. Ranks use stored source precision; displayed values may round to the same number.
Explore current officeholders and explicitly reviewed historical executive officials, labeled at the time of their actions. Timeline dates, action type, status and search also filter this list. Read any record’s summary, latest recorded status and official evidence below, or open it beside the timeline.
298 of 298 reviewed Maryland actions · newest first
Aug 31, 2026 · OAG 2026-08-31 · Settled a tenant-screening discrimination claim with Bay Management, requiring changes to criminal-history advertising and individualized applicant assessment. · Reported actionMaryland agencies · OAG 2026-08-31
Settled a tenant-screening discrimination claim with Bay Management, requiring changes to criminal-history advertising and individualized applicant assessment.
Aug 31, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown · Settled
FactVote reviewed summary
Settled a tenant-screening discrimination claim with Bay Management, requiring changes to criminal-history advertising and individualized applicant assessment.
Reported in an official release on 2026-08-31. Settled. This is the reporting date; a filing or order may precede it. Litigation, comments, and guidance do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contacts[email protected]410-576-7009BALTIMORE, MD – Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today announced that the Civil Rights Division of the Office of the Attorney General has reached a settlement with Bay Management Group, LLC (Bay Management) to resolve a claim of racial discrimination that resulted from tenant screening advertisements and applicant-facing materials used for Maryland rental housing that included criminal history language.The Civil Rights Division opened an investigation after receiving information that Bay Management advertised rental housing using phrases such as “clean criminal background check” or similar language. The Division found reasonable cause to believe that this language had a discriminatory effect.“A 'clean background check required' ad is a rejection letter in disguise,” said Attorney General Brown. “It tells people not to bother before they've even applied. This settlement takes that language off the table and requires housing providers to make an individualized assessment, not a blanket rejection based on a single line in an ad.” Housing providers cannot issue a blanket ban on renting to people with a criminal record. Doing so may violate state and federal fair housing laws. A housing provider may only consider a conviction record if it is closely related to whether the person will be a successful tenant. Housing providers must also give applicants a chance to share mitigating information or proof of rehabilitation. Starting October 1, 2026, the Maryland Fair Chance Housing Act will limit how housing providers can consider conviction records and is designed to reduce the racial impact of these screening policies.As part of the settlement, Bay Management will adopt a Civil Rights Division-approved criminal-history screening policy for its Maryland properties. The policy will provide applicants who may be denied based solely on criminal history an opportunity for individualized assessment. Bay Management will also remove “clean criminal background,” “clean criminal history,” and materially similar language from Maryland rental advertisements, qualification criteria, website content, appli
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Aug 6, 2026 · S 5298 · Delivering Americans Affordable Homes Act · IntroducedU.S. Congress · Maryland delegation · S 5298
Delivering Americans Affordable Homes Act
Aug 6, 2026 · Introduced
Sen. Chris Van Hollen · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Would authorize the Postal Service to lease certain property for housing development, subject to conditions including predominantly residential use.
2026-08-06: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The proposal has not become law in this evidence snapshot.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
119 S5298 IS: Delivering Americans Affordable Homes Act U.S. Senate 2026-08-06 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. II119th CONGRESS2d SessionS. 5298IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESAugust 6, 2026Mr. Van Hollen (for himself and Mr. Curtis) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental AffairsA BILLTo facilitate the leasing of United States Postal Service property for the development of housing, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Delivering Americans Affordable Homes Act.2.FindingsCongress finds the following:(1)The United States is facing a housing supply shortage that has resulted in a record number of housing cost-burdened households across regions and spanning the large and small cities, towns, and coastal and rural communities of the United States.(2)The Postal Service has operated with an annual financial loss in each year since fiscal year 2007. In fiscal year 2025, the Postal Service reported a net loss of $9,000,000,000.(3)The Postal Service owns roughly 8,500 parcels of land in communities across the country, many of which are suitable for housing development.(4)The development of housing on land owned by the Postal Service is consistent with its longstanding mission and the delivery of prompt, reliable, and efficient mail services to all communities.(5)In order to generate revenue to improve its financial position, and respond to the national housing supply shortage, it is in the public interest for the Postal Service to pursue opportunities to lease to State, local, and Tribal governments and their development partners those real property rights which would facilitate housing development and which would create new sources of revenue for the Postal Service.3.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Eligible housing useThe term eligible housing use means a project to construct new housing units—(A)for which not less than 80 percent of the total net rentable area is exclusively for residential use; and(B)which may include commercial, recreational, or publ
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 8, 2026 · OAG 2026-06-08 · Added four landlord defendants to the RealPage rental-pricing lawsuit. · Reported actionMaryland agencies · OAG 2026-06-08
Added four landlord defendants to the RealPage rental-pricing lawsuit.
Jun 8, 2026 · Reported action
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown · Amended lawsuit
FactVote reviewed summary
Added four landlord defendants to the RealPage rental-pricing lawsuit. The challenged coordination of rents remains an allegation in this filing.
Reported in an official release on 2026-06-08. Amended lawsuit. This is the reporting date; a filing or order may precede it. Litigation, comments, and guidance do not themselves enact legislation or establish final liability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
s Used RealPage to Raise Rent Prices in Violation of the Maryland Antitrust Act BALTIMORE, MD – Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today named four more landlords in Maryland’s suit against RealPage and residential landlords that used its revenue management software to coordinate prices and raise rents on thousands of Marylanders. The four new defendants are Camden Development Inc., Harbor Group Management Company LLC, Equity Residential Management LLC, and Trinity Property Consultants LLC. “These landlords used RealPage's rent-setting algorithm to drive up housing costs for thousands of Marylanders,” said Attorney General Brown. “Our Office will not stop until we get complete relief for Marylanders, hold these Defendants accountable, and secure guardrails for this technology to protect renters from these costly and unlawful schemes.” These landlords used RealPage software to fix rents at more than 30 apartment buildings in Baltimore City and Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Harford, Howard, Montgomery, and Prince George’s counties, raising rents for thousands of Marylanders by as much as $130 a month. These four new defendants are added to eight of the largest residential landlords in Maryland that were named in the lawsuit when it was filed on January 15, 2025. The defendant landlords are alleged to have unlawfully colluded to raise rents by agreeing to exchange competitively sensitive information and collectively setting rents based on RealPage’s technology that inflated prices, costing renters millions of dollars. The original press release announcing this lawsuit may be read here. The lawsuit is pending in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. ###
Inspect this action on the timeline ↑Jun 5, 2026 · EO 2026.11 · Executive Order 01.01.2026.11 — Creation of the Maryland Immigrant Rights Protection Task Force · IssuedGovernor · EO 2026.11
Executive Order 01.01.2026.11 — Creation of the Maryland Immigrant Rights Protection Task Force
Jun 5, 2026 · Issued
Gov. Wes Moore · Issued
FactVote reviewed summary
Creates an Immigrant Rights Protection Task Force to coordinate recommendations and outreach concerning exploitation, workplace rights, and access to services for immigrants. This establishes an advisory process.
Issued 2026-06-05. The relationship describes the order’s dated provisions and does not assert completion of its directives.
Why this record is included
Foreign-born residents include naturalized citizens and lawfully and unlawfully present noncitizens. A provision about a particular immigration status concerns only a subset of that population; it does not change a person’s birthplace. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Residents who are foreign-born. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
CUTIVE ORDER 01.01.2026.11 Creation of the Maryland Immigrant Rights Protection Task Force WHEREAS, The Maryland immigrant community is a vital part of the State's cultural and economic fabric, with 17% of Maryland's population being foreign born, 9.5% of U.S. -born residents having at least one immigrant parent, and 21.7% of the State's labor workforce being composed of immigrants; WHEREAS, Many immigrant Marylanders have long faced discrimination and substandard services in areas such as consumer and legal services, employment, and housing, due to factors such as language barriers and unfamiliarity with their rights; WHEREAS, The State is committed to protecting all residents from becoming victims of crime, to holding all those who prey on the vulnerable accountable, and to building a safer and more equitable Maryland that leaves no one behind; WHEREAS, The federal government's heightened immigration enforcement actions have further emboldened unscrupulous actors to take advantage of or discriminate against immigrant Marylanders, using new schemes to target immigrants for exploitation; WHEREAS, These rights violations not only harm immigrant individuals and families, they also distort markets, impede fair competition, diminish the safety and security of all Marylanders; and WHEREAS, Addressing fraud and exploitation among immigrant Marylanders requires a whole -of-government approach, with collaboration among State agencies and partnership with the Office of the Attorney General, the Office of the Comptroller, other State leaders, as well as local governments, community organizations, and the private sector. NOW THEREFORE, I, WES MOORE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, BY VIRTUE OF THE AUTHORITY VESTED IN ME BY THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF MARYLAND, HEREBY 2 PROCLAIM THE FOLLOWING EXECUTIVE ORDER EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: A. Establishment. 1. There is a Maryland Immigrant Rights Protection Task Force ("Task Force") to address fraud and exploitation of immigrant Marylanders. 2. The Task Force shall be administered by the Maryland Governor's Office of Immigrant Affairs (the "Office"), in consultation with the Office of the Attorney General and the Office of the C
Requiring the Department of Housing and Community Development, Office of Landlord and Tenant Affairs in consultation with the Attorney General to develop a plan to identify certain severe health and safety risk properties in the State and take related actions; requiring the Department to submit the plan and certain recommendations to the Governor and the General Assembly by August 31, 2027; and requiring the Department to publish a list of the names of the severe health and safety risk properties publicly on its website.
2026-05-26: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 632. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Requiring the Department of Housing and Community Development, Office of Landlord and Tenant Affairs in consultation with the Attorney General to develop a plan to identify certain severe health and safety risk properties in the State and take related actions; requiring the Department to submit the plan and certain recommendations to the Governor and the General Assembly by August 31, 2027; and requiring the Department to publish a list of the names of the severe health and safety risk properties publicly on its website.
Signed HB 1218: Safe and Healthy Homes for All Act. Official provision summary: Requiring the Department of Housing and Community Development, Office of Landlord and Tenant Affairs in consultation with the Attorney General to develop a plan to identify certain severe health and safety risk properties in the State and take related actions; requiring the Department to submit the plan and certain recommendations to the Governor and the General Assembly by August 31, 2027; and requiring the Department to publish a list of the names of the severe health and safety risk properties publicly on its website.
Signed on 2026-05-26. Approved by the Governor - Chapter 632. This records the governor’s action and does not establish current enforceability.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Requiring the Department of Housing and Community Development, Office of Landlord and Tenant Affairs in consultation with the Attorney General to develop a plan to identify certain severe health and safety risk properties in the State and take related actions; requiring the Department to submit the plan and certain recommendations to the Governor and the General Assembly by August 31, 2027; and requiring the Department to publish a list of the names of the severe health and safety risk properties publicly on its website.
Records come from published fact relationships or reviewed topic records with official supporting evidence and verified Maryland officeholder attribution. Historical executive officials require evidence tied to the action date and are excluded from incumbent proposals. Inclusion follows an explicit topic review, a related state fact, or the action’s title and supporting evidence. Explicit topic reviews take priority; repeated actions use the most recent explicit review for this topic. Duplicate actions attached to several facts appear once. This topic match is not a new finding that an action caused a result, and the reviewed collection is selective. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
What candidates are saying
Explore statements about housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs from FactVote’s Maryland candidate profiles. Compare candidates within each recorded race, with each person’s matching statements kept together. These are candidate and campaign statements, not verified outcomes.
13 statements from 7 candidates
2026 Maryland Comptroller — General Election
1 candidate with matching statements · 1 statement
At the same time, we will be putting forward bold policy proposals that get at the heart of the issues facing Maryland: the need for a solidarity economy, the climate and environmental crises, high-quality public education, healthcare and housing as human rights, reliable public transit, divestment …
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
At the same time, we will be putting forward bold policy proposals that get at the heart of the issues facing Maryland: the need for a solidarity economy, the climate and environmental crises, high-quality public education, healthcare and housing as human rights, reliable public transit, divestment from war and genocide, and more.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
We will advocate for all families across our state, ensuring that everyone, including single mothers and fathers, receives the opportunities and resources they need to thrive. When our children can afford to live here and are not forced to move to find jobs and affordable housing, then Maryland fami…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing affordability
Candidate campaign source
We will advocate for all families across our state, ensuring that everyone, including single mothers and fathers, receives the opportunities and resources they need to thrive. When our children can afford to live here and are not forced to move to find jobs and affordable housing, then Maryland families will grow, and our State will have a more secure future.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
To keep families, children, and grandchildren in Maryland, we must ensure affordable options for first-time home buyers. Dan plans an aggressive affordability program, including considering mortgage downpayment assistance and tax credits for first-time and young home buyers, slashing ridiculous buil…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Economy, jobs, taxes, and affordability
Candidate campaign source
To keep families, children, and grandchildren in Maryland, we must ensure affordable options for first-time home buyers. Dan plans an aggressive affordability program, including considering mortgage downpayment assistance and tax credits for first-time and young home buyers, slashing ridiculous building costs and permitting burdens that send our builders out of state, and increasing tax write-off options for home building and renovation costs. At the same time, we must immediately cease taxing our seniors out of their retirement homes through statewide law and executive action to limit, cap, and, where possible, eliminate property taxes.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Rep. Andy Harris is perpetuating a scam on the American people by cutting taxes for billionaires while doing nothing for working families in Maryland. Everyday costs, for housing, groceries, utilities, health care, and transportation are out of control. He’s supported the tariffs and cuts to critica…
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Health care
Candidate campaign source
Rep. Andy Harris is perpetuating a scam on the American people by cutting taxes for billionaires while doing nothing for working families in Maryland. Everyday costs, for housing, groceries, utilities, health care, and transportation are out of control. He’s supported the tariffs and cuts to critical services that result in thousands in additional annual costs for American families. For young people in Maryland, owning a home has become out of reach. It’s impossible to save for emergencies, let alone for vacations. We will re-write rules, and pursue sensible economic policies that make the economy work for Maryland families and working class people, instead of for billionaires.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
Expand existing federal rural mortgage programs (USDA Direct, FHA, and VA loans) and affordable mortgage programs for veterans, educators, healthcare workers and first responders.
Read exact statement & source
Source topic or question: Housing affordability
Candidate campaign source
Expand existing federal rural mortgage programs (USDA Direct, FHA, and VA loans) and affordable mortgage programs for veterans, educators, healthcare workers and first responders.
Statement date not recorded · Profile reviewed Sep 15, 2026
This section matches specific housing, rent, homeownership and borrowing costs terms in retained, attributed source text from published Maryland candidate profiles. A profile heading or biography alone does not qualify. The Florida geography is fixed; saved state preferences cannot change these results. A mention can concern a community or group rather than Florida’s statewide measure.
Matching is automatic and does not establish a candidate’s stance, the accuracy of a claim, or an effect on the measured result. Results are grouped by recorded race, then by candidate name. Within each candidate, the matching issue mentions appear first. Only candidates with matching retained statements are shown; this is not a complete race roster. Repeated identical text for the same candidate is shown once. Coverage follows the existing state profiles and is not a complete record of all candidates or everything they have said. Review dates are not statement dates.
Maryland incumbents
What incumbents are proposing
Explore reviewed bills sponsored by current Maryland legislators and Maryland’s congressional delegation, plus retained proposals from Maryland’s governor and agencies. Each record keeps its latest recorded status and official evidence.
223 matching sponsorships or proposals · 76 Maryland incumbents. These filters apply only to this section.
Community Development Administration - Financial Assistance Programs - Prohibitions
Feb 22, 2021 · Did not pass
Comptroller Brooke Lierman · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prohibiting the Community Development Administration from requiring the use of long-term tax-exempt bonds to qualify for Rental Housing Works loans or otherwise conditioning the award of financial assistance under an affordable housing program administered by the Administration on the use of any other Administration resource.
The measure did not pass in its completed 2021RS session. Final recorded action: 2021-02-22, Withdrawn by Sponsor.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Prohibiting the Community Development Administration from requiring the use of long-term tax-exempt bonds to qualify for Rental Housing Works loans or otherwise conditioning the award of financial assistance under an affordable housing program administered by the Administration on the use of any other Administration resource.
Requiring the planning commissions for certain local jurisdictions to include a housing element in the comprehensive plan for their respective jurisdictions; providing that the contents of the housing element in certain comprehensive plans include goals, objectives, policies, plans, and standards and address the need for affordable housing within a county, including workforce housing and low-income housing; and applying the Act prospectively.
2019-05-25: Enacted under Article II, Section 17(c) of the Maryland Constitution - Chapter 713. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Requiring the planning commissions for certain local jurisdictions to include a housing element in the comprehensive plan for their respective jurisdictions; providing that the contents of the housing element in certain comprehensive plans include goals, objectives, policies, plans, and standards and address the need for affordable housing within a county, including workforce housing and low-income housing; and applying the Act prospectively.
2 proposalsView proposals from Del. Adrian BoafoMaryland Legislature · HB 1077
Landlord and Tenant - Residential Leases - Prospective Tenant Criminal History Records Check (Maryland Fair Chance Housing Act)
Feb 5, 2025 · Did not pass
Del. Adrian Boafo · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Prohibiting a landlord from requiring or requesting from a prospective tenant certain information relating to criminal history and prohibiting a landlord from considering certain information when evaluating the prospective tenant; permitting a landlord to consider certain criminal history information prior to extending a conditional offer to a prospective tenant and requiring the landlord to consider certain information provided by a prospective tenant relating to a criminal history records check; etc.
The measure did not pass in its completed 2025RS session. Final recorded action: 2025-02-05, Hearing 2/25 at 1:00 p.m..
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Prohibiting a landlord from requiring or requesting from a prospective tenant certain information relating to criminal history and prohibiting a landlord from considering certain information when evaluating the prospective tenant; permitting a landlord to consider certain criminal history information prior to extending a conditional offer to a prospective tenant and requiring the landlord to consider certain information provided by a prospective tenant relating to a criminal history records check; etc.
Landlords and Prospective Tenants - Residential Leases - Criminal History Review (Maryland Fair Chance in Housing Act)
Feb 6, 2024 · Did not pass
Del. Adrian Boafo · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Altering the number of years of criminal history, from 7 years to 3 years, that are reviewed in a certain reusable tenant screening report; establishing certain prohibitions and limitations on the review and consideration of a prospective tenant's criminal history; and requiring a landlord that denies the lease application of a prospective tenant to provide the individual with a physical document stating with particularity each reason for the denial.
The measure did not pass in its completed 2024RS session. Final recorded action: 2024-02-06, Hearing 2/27 at 1:00 p.m..
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Altering the number of years of criminal history, from 7 years to 3 years, that are reviewed in a certain reusable tenant screening report; establishing certain prohibitions and limitations on the review and consideration of a prospective tenant's criminal history; and requiring a landlord that denies the lease application of a prospective tenant to provide the individual with a physical document stating with particularity each reason for the denial.
1 proposalView proposals from Del. April MillerMaryland Legislature · HB 1538
Land Use - Accessory Dwelling Units - Requirements and Prohibitions (Maryland Generational Housing Act of 2026)
Feb 17, 2026 · Did not pass
Del. April Miller · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requiring a certain local law to authorize development of at least one internal accessory dwelling unit and one external accessory dwelling unit on certain land notwithstanding a certain density limit; limiting the imposition of off-street parking requirements to certain accessory dwelling units; prohibiting a utility provider from charging a certain property owner certain fees; authorizing a certain accessory dwelling unit to share certain utility meters and service laterals with a primary single-family detached dwelling unit; etc.
The measure did not pass in its completed 2026RS session. Final recorded action: 2026-02-17, Hearing 3/13 at 1:00 p.m..
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Requiring a certain local law to authorize development of at least one internal accessory dwelling unit and one external accessory dwelling unit on certain land notwithstanding a certain density limit; limiting the imposition of off-street parking requirements to certain accessory dwelling units; prohibiting a utility provider from charging a certain property owner certain fees; authorizing a certain accessory dwelling unit to share certain utility meters and service laterals with a primary single-family detached dwelling unit; etc.
1 proposalView proposals from Del. Ben BarnesMaryland Legislature · HB 724
Access to Counsel in Evictions Special Fund - Funding
Feb 3, 2022 · Did not pass
Del. Ben Barnes · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requiring the Comptroller to distribute $11,800,000 of certain abandoned property funds to the Access to Counsel in Evictions Special Fund for fiscal year 2023.
The measure did not pass in its completed 2022RS session. Final recorded action: 2022-02-03, Hearing 2/16 at 1:00 p.m..
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Requiring the Comptroller to distribute $11,800,000 of certain abandoned property funds to the Access to Counsel in Evictions Special Fund for fiscal year 2023.
1 proposalView proposals from Del. Bernice Mireku-NorthMaryland Legislature · HB 93
Landlord and Tenant - Termination of Residential Lease - Limitation of Liability for Rent
Apr 25, 2024 · Enacted
Del. Bernice Mireku-North · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Expands the existing limit of two months’ rent after a qualifying medical lease termination to certain mental disorders. Certification must establish that continued habitation is unfeasible or unsustainable, or that the patient must move for a higher level of care. Also permits licensed psychologists to certify, with the existing notice and expected-duration requirements.
2024-04-25: Approved by the Governor - Chapter 290. This records the legislative disposition; later implementation or court decisions may differ.
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
HB 93 Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2024 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Third Reader - Revised House Bill 93 (Delegate Mireku - North, et al. ) Environment and Transportation Judicial Proceedings Landlord and Tenant - Termination of Residential Lease - Limitation of Liability for Rent This bill generally expands the circumstances under which a tenant ’s liability for rent may be limited when vacating a premises due to medical reasons by (1) specifically extending applicability to individuals with a mental disorder who meet certain requirements and (2) authorizing psychologists to complete the necessary certification that a tenant must provide to the landlord. Fiscal Summary State Effect: The bill does not materially affect State operations or finances. Local Effect: The bill does not materially affect local government operations or finances. Small Business Effect: Minimal. Analysis Bill Summary/Current Law: In limited circumstances under statute, a tenant’s liability for rent under a lease agreement may not exceed two months’ rent following the date on which the tenant vacates the premises due to certain medical conditions. In order to qualify for this limitation, prior to vacating the premises the tenant must provide the landlord with: (1) a certification prepared by a physician, as discussed below, regarding the medical condition of an individual who is a named party in a lease or an authorized occupant under the lease ’ s terms and (2) a written notice of the termination of the lease stating the date by when the tenant will vacate the premises.
HB 93/ Page 2 The certification must specify that the physician ’ s patient is no longer able to live at the leased premises because the patient has a medical condition that (1) substantially restricts the physical mobility of the patient within, or from entering and exiting, the leased premises or (2) requires the patient to move to a home, facility, or institution to obtain a higher level of care than can be provided at the leased premises. The bill establishes that a qualifying medical condition also includes a mental disorder (as defined in statute) if the condition either (1) causes the continued habitation of the leased premises to be unfeasible or unsustainable for the patient or (2) requires the patient to move to a home, facility, or institution to obtain a higher level of care than can be provided at the leased premises. Under current law (and unchanged by the bill), the certification must also state that the expected duration of the patient’s medical condition will continue beyond the termination d ate of the patient’s lease. Under current law, the certification must be prepared on the letterhead or printed prescription form of the physician and be signed by the physician. The bill expands the list of medical professionals who may complete the necessary certification to include licensed psychologists, as specified, and makes related conforming changes. Generally, the provisions discussed above do not apply to a tenant under a residential lease that contains a liquidated damages clause or early termination clause that (1) requires written notice to vacate of one month or less and (2) imposes liability for rent less than or equal to two months ’ rent after the date on which the tenant vacates the leased premises. Additional Information Recent Prior Introductions: Similar legislation has not been introduced within the last three years. Designated Cross File: SB 162 (Senator Waldstreicher) - Judicial Proceedings. Information Source(s): Baltimore City; Howard and Prince George’s counties; Judiciary (Administrative Office of the Courts); Maryland Department of Health; Department of Legislative Services
HB 93/ Page 3 Fiscal Note History: First Reader - January 26, 2024 Third Reader - March 15, 2024 Revised - Amendment(s) - March 15 , 2024 rh / jkb Analysis by: Donavan A. Ham Direct Inquiries to: (410) 946-5510 (301) 970-5510
2 proposalsView proposals from Del. Brian ChisholmMaryland Legislature · HB 229
Real Property - Holding Over - Expedited Hearing and Service of Summons for Active Duty Service Members
Jan 10, 2025 · Did not pass
Del. Brian Chisholm · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requiring the District Court to hold a hearing on a tenant holding over within 45 days after a landlord makes a complaint if the landlord or the landlord's spouse is on active duty with the United States military; and authorizing a private process server to serve a certain summons if the constable or sheriff of the county fails to serve the summons within 10 days after the summons is issued by the court.
The measure did not pass in its completed 2025RS session. Final recorded action: 2025-01-10, Hearing 1/29 at 1:00 p.m..
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Requiring the District Court to hold a hearing on a tenant holding over within 45 days after a landlord makes a complaint if the landlord or the landlord's spouse is on active duty with the United States military; and authorizing a private process server to serve a certain summons if the constable or sheriff of the county fails to serve the summons within 10 days after the summons is issued by the court.
Real Property – Holding Over – Expedited Hearing and Service of Summons for Active Duty Service Member
Mar 14, 2024 · Did not pass
Del. Brian Chisholm · Sponsored
FactVote reviewed summary
Requiring a District Court to hold a hearing on a tenant holding over within 45 days after a landlord makes a complaint if the landlord or the landlord's spouse is on active duty with the United States military; and authorizing a private process server to serve a summons if the constable or sheriff fails to serve the summons within 10 days after the summons is issued by the court.
The measure did not pass in its completed 2024RS session. Final recorded action: 2024-03-14, Hearing 3/21 at 1:00 p.m..
Why this record is included
Gross rent includes contract rent and tenant-paid utilities. Rental protections, assistance, and housing supply concern components of rental-market conditions; they do not set Maryland’s median rent. This relationship does not establish causation. Actions after the fact’s measurement period cannot explain its earlier value.
Retained Maryland evidence context: Median gross rent. This record’s connection to the topic does not establish an effect on the measured result.
Requiring a District Court to hold a hearing on a tenant holding over within 45 days after a landlord makes a complaint if the landlord or the landlord's spouse is on active duty with the United States military; and authorizing a private process server to serve a summons if the constable or sheriff fails to serve the summons within 10 days after the summons is issued by the court.
Only current Maryland officeholders retained in the reviewed collection qualify. Bills require a recorded primary sponsorship; cosponsors and signing officials are excluded from sponsorship counts. An official introducer recorded as acting by request is labeled “Introduced by request”; that procedural role does not establish personal policy endorsement. Governor and agency records qualify when recorded as proposed. A separately verified governor transmittal can also establish an original proposal whose latest status reflects its later outcome. Signing an enacted law alone does not establish a proposal. A record appearing under several facts is counted once per officeholder. A bill with multiple primary sponsors appears under each recorded sponsor.
Enacted bills, adopted resolutions and unsuccessful measures remain visible as proposal history. Passing one chamber is not enactment. These counts do not measure effectiveness or prove that an action changed a Maryland statistic. Collection reviewed Oct 5, 2026.
Sources & methods
Every section retains its primary sources, units, reporting periods and comparison limits. Maps, graphs and tables use the same observation and cohort. All 50 states are listed; D.C. and territories are excluded. Missing and suppressed values remain unavailable and never become zero.
#1 is the highest measured value. Equal source values share a rank and leave gaps (1, 2, 2, 4). Ranks use source precision and are descriptive, not a score of the state. Survey uncertainty and reporting coverage can limit comparisons. Published U.S. benchmarks are used where available; a state average is not substituted.
Maryland snapshots and fiscal sources keep their own dates and accounting scope. National events and federal distribution explainers describe national context. Actions and statements are filtered to Maryland, retain their reviewed evidence, and do not establish that a policy caused a measured change.
Retained state source collections assembled October 5, 2026. Original review and source dates remain visible. Refreshing this page does not refresh an official data release.